2.2· 97 questions · 3430 marks · 4116 min · 2017–2025· Structured questions
Every Cambridge IGCSE Sociology Paper 2 question on how does society control us?, laid out as 40 A4 pages with the mark scheme below. Nothing is left out. Free to read, no account.

1 / 40

2 / 40

3 / 40

4 / 40

5 / 40

6 / 40
7 / 40
8 / 40
9 / 40

10 / 40

11 / 40

12 / 40
13 / 40
14 / 40

15 / 40
16 / 40

17 / 40
18 / 40

19 / 40

20 / 40

21 / 40

22 / 40

23 / 40
24 / 40

25 / 40
26 / 40

27 / 40
28 / 40

29 / 40
30 / 40
31 / 40
32 / 40
33 / 40
34 / 40
35 / 40
36 / 40![Question 91: (a) Define the term: (i) peer group [2] (ii) hate crime. [2] (b) State two strengths of using official statistics to measure crime. [2] (c)…](https://img.pastlit.com/crops/aba54e22-c28a-456a-a3bb-7542bf2af141/q3.webp)
37 / 40![Question 93: (a) Define the term: (i) linguistic factors [2] (ii) conformity. [2] (b) Give two examples of an ethnocentric curriculum. [2] (c) Describe …](https://img.pastlit.com/crops/710e2074-9251-4795-810d-cdb4b57babbf/q2.webp)
38 / 40![Question 95: (a) Define the term: (i) discrimination [2] (ii) probation. [2] (b) State two patterns of victimisation. [2] (c) Describe three ways inform…](https://img.pastlit.com/crops/4ff5cf9c-e31a-4dd6-9b4f-25f0e510af3c/q3.webp)
39 / 40
40 / 40Answers below. Sit the paper first if you are practising.
Pastlit
Sociology 0495 · How does society control us? — Paper 2
IGCSE · topical answer key — answer key (teacher use)
Question
Answer
Marks
35
35
35
35
35
35
35
35
35
35
35
35
35
35
35
35
35
35
35
35
35
35
35
35
35
35
35
35
35
35
35
35
35
35
35
35
35
35
35
35
35
35
35
35
35
35
35
35
35
35
35
35
35
35
35
35
35
35
35
35
35
35
35
35
35
35
35
35
35
35
35
35
35
35
35
35
35
35
35
35
35
35
35
35
35
35
35
35
35
35
40
40
40
40
40
40
40| Question | Answer | Marks | From |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | see sheet | 35 | 0495/21 May/June 2017 |
| 2 | see sheet | 35 | 0495/22 May/June 2017 |
| 3 | see sheet | 35 | 0495/23 May/June 2017 |
| 4 | see sheet | 35 | 0495/21 Oct/Nov 2017 |
| 5 | see sheet | 35 | 0495/21 Oct/Nov 2017 |
| 6 | see sheet | 35 | 0495/21 Oct/Nov 2017 |
| 7 | see sheet | 35 | 0495/22 Oct/Nov 2017 |
| 8 | see sheet | 35 | 0495/22 Oct/Nov 2017 |
| 9 | see sheet | 35 | 0495/22 Oct/Nov 2017 |
| 10 | see sheet | 35 | 0495/23 Oct/Nov 2017 |
| 11 | see sheet | 35 | 0495/23 Oct/Nov 2017 |
| 12 | see sheet | 35 | 0495/23 Oct/Nov 2017 |
| 13 | see sheet | 35 | 0495/21 May/June 2018 |
| 14 | see sheet | 35 | 0495/21 May/June 2018 |
| 15 | see sheet | 35 | 0495/22 May/June 2018 |
| 16 | see sheet | 35 | 0495/23 May/June 2018 |
| 17 | see sheet | 35 | 0495/23 May/June 2018 |
| 18 | see sheet | 35 | 0495/23 May/June 2018 |
| 19 | see sheet | 35 | 0495/21 Oct/Nov 2018 |
| 20 | see sheet | 35 | 0495/22 Oct/Nov 2018 |
| 21 | see sheet | 35 | 0495/22 Oct/Nov 2018 |
| 22 | see sheet | 35 | 0495/23 Oct/Nov 2018 |
| 23 | see sheet | 35 | 0495/21 May/June 2019 |
| 24 | see sheet | 35 | 0495/21 May/June 2019 |
| 25 | see sheet | 35 | 0495/21 May/June 2019 |
| 26 | see sheet | 35 | 0495/22 May/June 2019 |
| 27 | see sheet | 35 | 0495/22 May/June 2019 |
| 28 | see sheet | 35 | 0495/22 May/June 2019 |
| 29 | see sheet | 35 | 0495/23 May/June 2019 |
| 30 | see sheet | 35 | 0495/23 May/June 2019 |
| 31 | see sheet | 35 | 0495/23 May/June 2019 |
| 32 | see sheet | 35 | 0495/21 Oct/Nov 2019 |
| 33 | see sheet | 35 | 0495/22 Oct/Nov 2019 |
| 34 | see sheet | 35 | 0495/23 Oct/Nov 2019 |
| 35 | see sheet | 35 | 0495/21 May/June 2020 |
| 36 | see sheet | 35 | 0495/21 May/June 2020 |
| 37 | see sheet | 35 | 0495/22 May/June 2020 |
| 38 | see sheet | 35 | 0495/22 May/June 2020 |
| 39 | see sheet | 35 | 0495/23 May/June 2020 |
| 40 | see sheet | 35 | 0495/23 May/June 2020 |
| 41 | see sheet | 35 | 0495/21 Oct/Nov 2020 |
| 42 | see sheet | 35 | 0495/21 Oct/Nov 2020 |
| 43 | see sheet | 35 | 0495/21 Oct/Nov 2020 |
| 44 | see sheet | 35 | 0495/22 Oct/Nov 2020 |
| 45 | see sheet | 35 | 0495/22 Oct/Nov 2020 |
| 46 | see sheet | 35 | 0495/23 Oct/Nov 2020 |
| 47 | see sheet | 35 | 0495/23 Oct/Nov 2020 |
| 48 | see sheet | 35 | 0495/23 Oct/Nov 2020 |
| 49 | see sheet | 35 | 0495/21 May/June 2021 |
| 50 | see sheet | 35 | 0495/21 May/June 2021 |
| 51 | see sheet | 35 | 0495/22 May/June 2021 |
| 52 | see sheet | 35 | 0495/22 May/June 2021 |
| 53 | see sheet | 35 | 0495/23 May/June 2021 |
| 54 | see sheet | 35 | 0495/23 May/June 2021 |
| 55 | see sheet | 35 | 0495/21 Oct/Nov 2021 |
| 56 | see sheet | 35 | 0495/21 Oct/Nov 2021 |
| 57 | see sheet | 35 | 0495/22 Oct/Nov 2021 |
| 58 | see sheet | 35 | 0495/22 Oct/Nov 2021 |
| 59 | see sheet | 35 | 0495/23 Oct/Nov 2021 |
| 60 | see sheet | 35 | 0495/23 Oct/Nov 2021 |
| 61 | see sheet | 35 | 0495/21 May/June 2022 |
| 62 | see sheet | 35 | 0495/22 May/June 2022 |
| 63 | see sheet | 35 | 0495/22 May/June 2022 |
| 64 | see sheet | 35 | 0495/23 May/June 2022 |
| 65 | see sheet | 35 | 0495/23 May/June 2022 |
| 66 | see sheet | 35 | 0495/23 May/June 2022 |
| 67 | see sheet | 35 | 0495/21 Oct/Nov 2022 |
| 68 | see sheet | 35 | 0495/22 Oct/Nov 2022 |
| 69 | see sheet | 35 | 0495/23 Oct/Nov 2022 |
| 70 | see sheet | 35 | 0495/23 Oct/Nov 2022 |
| 71 | see sheet | 35 | 0495/23 Oct/Nov 2022 |
| 72 | see sheet | 35 | 0495/21 May/June 2023 |
| 73 | see sheet | 35 | 0495/21 May/June 2023 |
| 74 | see sheet | 35 | 0495/21 May/June 2023 |
| 75 | see sheet | 35 | 0495/22 May/June 2023 |
| 76 | see sheet | 35 | 0495/22 May/June 2023 |
| 77 | see sheet | 35 | 0495/23 May/June 2023 |
| 78 | see sheet | 35 | 0495/23 May/June 2023 |
| 79 | see sheet | 35 | 0495/22 Oct/Nov 2023 |
| 80 | see sheet | 35 | 0495/23 Oct/Nov 2023 |
| 81 | see sheet | 35 | 0495/23 Oct/Nov 2023 |
| 82 | see sheet | 35 | 0495/21 May/June 2024 |
| 83 | see sheet | 35 | 0495/22 May/June 2024 |
| 84 | see sheet | 35 | 0495/22 May/June 2024 |
| 85 | see sheet | 35 | 0495/23 May/June 2024 |
| 86 | see sheet | 35 | 0495/23 May/June 2024 |
| 87 | see sheet | 35 | 0495/21 Oct/Nov 2024 |
| 88 | see sheet | 35 | 0495/22 Oct/Nov 2024 |
| 89 | see sheet | 35 | 0495/22 Oct/Nov 2024 |
| 90 | see sheet | 35 | 0495/23 Oct/Nov 2024 |
| 91 | see sheet | 40 | 0495/21 May/June 2025 |
| 92 | see sheet | 40 | 0495/22 May/June 2025 |
| 93 | see sheet | 40 | 0495/23 May/June 2025 |
| 94 | see sheet | 40 | 0495/23 May/June 2025 |
| 95 | see sheet | 40 | 0495/21 Oct/Nov 2025 |
| 96 | see sheet | 40 | 0495/22 Oct/Nov 2025 |
| 97 | see sheet | 40 | 0495/23 Oct/Nov 2025 |
3 According to official figures, crime rates vary between different social groups. Juvenile delinquency, for example, is particularly common among working class males. Some sociologists believe that this is due to the social pressures on males to prove their masculinity. (a) What is meant by the term ‘juvenile delinquency’? [2] (b) Describe two reasons why crime rates for older people are low. [4] (c) Explain how surveillance can be used to target people to prevent crime. [6] (d) Explain why Marxists think we have crime and deviance in society. [8] (e) To what extent is criminal behaviour a way for males to prove their masculinity? [15] Section D: Media
35 marks
Mark scheme: 3(a) What is meant by the term ‘juvenile delinquency’? 2 One mark for partial definition, e.g. young criminals. Two marks for clear definition, e.g. deviant acts by young people that would be viewed as crimes if they were adults. 3(b) Describe two reasons why crime rates for older people are low. 4 Possible answers: • older people may have more to lose i.e. employment, housing, family etc.; • older people are less susceptible to peer pressure than young people looking to increase their status; • older people are rarely represented as criminal role models in the media, unlike younger people i.e. music videos and gang culture; • a lot of people ‘grow out of crime’, it is merely a phase in their lives when they are younger Matza and drift theory; • older people are less likely to be targeted and stereotyped as criminals by the police; • the courts are unlikely to picture older people as typical criminals and therefore may be more likely to find them not guilty; • other reasonable response. One mark for each point correctly identified (up to maximum of two). One mark for each point that is developed (up to a maximum of two). 3(c) Explain how surveillance can be used to target people to prevent crime. 6 Surveillance could be considered in terms of formal agents i.e. the police or informal agents i.e. neighbourhood/community watch schemes. Similarly, specific examples of surveillance may be referred to or a more general approach to the reasons for using surveillance i.e. deterrence may be taken. All are fine to credit. Possible answers: • computer surveillance i.e. monitoring the websites people visit, e- mails etc.; • telephone surveillance – monitoring people's phone calls and communication; • surveillance cameras i.e. CCTV in the streets, identity card systems etc. to keep an eye on people; • using social media contacts to track and monitor connections between people; • electronic tagging of people; • covert surveillance i.e. undercover police officers infiltrating groups and people under suspicion; • physical surveillance by eye – neighbourhood watch, for example, looking out for suspicious people; • other reasonable response. Band 0 [0 marks] No creditworthy response. Band 1 [1–3 marks] Answers in this band will show only a limited awareness of how surveillance can be used to prevent crime and may talk about e.g. ‘spying on people’. Responses may be short and un/under developed. At the bottom of the band (1 mark), expect one weak point. Higher in the band (2–3 marks), candidates may offer more than one weak point, but there may be a tendency towards simplistic answers, engaging with sociological ideas without using sociological language. Band 2 [4–6 marks] A clear and accurate explanation, showing good sociological knowledge and understanding of the ways surveillance can be used to prevent crime. Sociological terms and concepts should be expected e.g. ‘Electronic surveillance of people's internet and social media usage is increasingly common in the digital world and allows the authorities to track people's digital footprint and thus monitor behaviour in order to prevent crime’. This would be followed by explanation of factors leading to this. At the bottom of the band, the range of points covered may be narrow or lack detail. Higher in the band, answers will cover more than one factor in a well-developed way or cover several factors in less detail. 3(d) Explain why Marxists think we have crime and deviance in society. 8 The Marxist explanations of crime and deviance may refer to structural inequalities in terms of pay and status under capitalism or to more recent versions of Marxist theory that combine insights from traditional Marxism with labelling theory (i.e. Neo Marxism). Possible answers: • Marxists believe laws are made by the state in order to protect the interests of the ruling class and that therefore the working class are criminalised by those in positions of power; • relative deprivation is commonplace in a capitalist system and is thought by Marxists to explain criminal and deviant behaviour as poorer people perceive it as unfair that others in society have more than they do which breeds resentment; • marginalisation – poorer people in society are thought by Marxists to have no outlet through which to portray their anger and frustrations at the unfair society they live in which can lead to protests via rioting and looting; • it is typically powerless social groups in society who are targeted by middle class institutions such as the police – high stop and search rates for some ethnic minorities, for example; • material deprivation – poverty and a lack of money can help to explain many crimes committed for financial gain; • crime as a reaction to the oppression and exploitation experienced by the lower social classes in capitalist societies; • crime and deviance may be committed as resistance to the structural inequalities in society i.e. youth sub-cultures; other reasonable response. Band 0 [0 marks] No creditworthy response. Band 1 [1–3 marks] Answers in this band will show only a limited awareness of why Marxists think we have crime and deviance. A tendency to description is likely. Responses may be short and undeveloped, e.g. ‘because people are poor’ stated without explanation. Sociological terms and concepts are unlikely to be used. At the bottom of the band (1 mark), expect one weak point. Higher in the band (2–3 marks), candidates may offer more than one weak point. 3(d) Band 2 [4–6 marks] Answers in this band will show basic sociological knowledge and understanding of why Marxists think we have crime and deviance. Responses may be underdeveloped and lacking in range. e.g. ‘Marxists believe crime and deviance are often reactions to the inequalities experienced by poorer people in society’ etc. At the bottom of the band, candidates are unlikely to use sociological terms and concepts accurately. Higher in the band, candidates may be beginning to use sociological terms and concepts with greater accuracy. However, some aspects of the answer may only be partially developed/ explained. Band 3 [7–8 marks] Answers in this band will show good sociological knowledge and understanding of why Marxists think we have crime and deviance in society and will be well developed and explained. e.g. ‘Exploitation and structural inequalities are inherent features of capitalist society and breed anger and resentment in the working classes. This can lead to crime and deviance both for financial gain due to relative deprivation and to express their dissatisfaction with the system’. They can then expand on the explanation of this and other factors as necessary. Sociological terms and concepts will be used accurately overall. Answers will be well focused on the question and there will be a range of reasons presented. At the top of the band explanations will be clear throughout. 3(e) To what extent is criminal behaviour a way for males to prove their 15 masculinity? Candidates may focus on criminal behaviour generally in their answer or discuss specific criminal acts in order to evidence their points. Possible answers: For: • the most dominant form of masculinity valued in most societies is hegemonic masculinity and therefore males are encouraged from an early age to be strong, not show emotion, be competitive and to use violence to solve problems. Much of this behaviour is akin to criminality; • through the socialisation process boys learn how important it is to be perceived as masculine by others – committing acts of crime can be one way to prove this; • males may be labelled as effeminate or gay if they do not conform to society's expectations of masculinity and could then be subject to negative sanctions – one way to try and avoid this is to commit acts of criminality; • feminists believe that many acts of crime against women i.e. physical and sexual abuse, are means through which males are able to assert and prove their masculinity; 3(e) • rites of passage and initiation ceremonies that are commonplace in most gangs involve high levels of violence and are typically committed by males who must prove their masculinity to others; • lower levels of informal social control for males than females means they have more opportunities to be criminal and so to prove their masculinity; • other reasonable response. Against: • if all males were subject to the need to prove their masculinity then all males would commit crime – the majority of males, however, are law abiding; • Marxist explanations involving ideas about relative deprivation, exploitation and structural inequalities may be more useful in terms of explaining crime and deviance; • labelling theory's ideas such as police targeting and stereotyping leading to a self-fulfilling prophecy may be more useful for explaining why people commit crime; • poor or inadequate socialisation (New Right perspective) may better explain crime and deviance than pressures to be masculine; • masculinity cannot explain the crimes committed by females; • cybercrimes and other white collar crimes are difficult to link to notions of masculinity; • a lot of crime is committed for fun/thrill seeking behaviour – Postmodernism; • many crimes are committed because the perpetrator has had the opportunity i.e. fraud, nothing to do with masculinity; • other reasonable response. Band 0 [0 marks] No creditworthy response. Band 1 [1–4 marks] Answers in this band may be vague and largely based on common sense showing limited knowledge of the extent to which committing crimes allows males to prove their masculinity. Use of sociological terms or concepts is very unlikely. Responses may be short, undeveloped and one-sided. e.g. Men commit crimes of violence to show that they are tough. Gang crime is a good example of crimes committed by males to look masculine. Lower in the band (1–2 marks), expect one or two weak points. Higher in the band (3–4 marks) candidates may offer more than two points or provide a weak definition of key terms, e.g. masculinity refers to the attitudes and behaviour associated with being a man, in the question. 3(e) Band 2 [5–8 marks] In this band candidates will show some basic knowledge of the extent to which committing crimes allows males to prove their masculinity. Alternatively, they may offer an answer which is list-like in nature but there will be no real attempt to assess the issues raised by the question. There may be limited/some use of sociological terms or concepts. Responses may be underdeveloped and lack range. Answers may be simplistic and two-sided responses are unlikely e.g. Men use crime as a way to prove they are real men and to avoid being referred to as feminine. Males are socialised to be unemotional and physically strong and so criminal behaviour is just an extension of these learnt norms etc. Lower in the band, the response will be rather narrow in the points covered and there will be little development. Higher in the band, more points will be covered and there will be limited development of some points. Alternatively, a list-like answer with little development covering both sides of the argument may score up to 8 marks. A one-sided answer cannot score higher than 8 marks. Band 3 [9–12 marks] Answers in this band will show good sociological knowledge and understanding of the extent to which committing crimes allows males to prove their masculinity. Sociological terms and concepts will be used with greater accuracy and/or frequency. For the most part, answers will be well developed, focused on the question and there will be a range of points presented. Candidates may say that e.g. despite some crimes being committed by males in order to prove their masculinity; this is not true for them all and cannot explain the offending rates of females. There will be a two-sided response but this may be unbalanced. At the bottom of the band, candidates may provide a narrower range of well-developed points. At the top of the band, expect a wider range of points and clear focus on the question. Band 4 [13–15 marks] Answers in this band will show excellent knowledge and understanding of the extent to which committing crimes allows males to prove their masculinity. There will be a strong grasp of the argument as well as accurate and frequent use of sociological terms and concepts. Answers will be well developed, clearly focused on the question and discuss a wide range of points. Responses will be two-sided and balanced. At the bottom of the band (13 marks), the answer may lack a specific conclusion. Higher in the band, there will be a clear attempt to offer an assessment of the ‘To what extent«?’ part of the question through a focused conclusion. Candidates should show consideration of points for and against the idea of crime being linked to masculinity, citing some of the examples given.
3 Explanations for crime depend on the type of crime being discussed. For example, the reasons people commit urban crime are different to the reasons people commit domestic violence. Some sociologists believe crime is mainly committed due to material deprivation whilst others disagree. (a) What is meant by the term ‘urban crime’? [2] (b) Describe two sociological explanations for crime, apart from material deprivation. [4] (c) Explain how moral panics in the media can affect the public’s view of crime and criminals. [6] (d) Explain why the police appear to target some social groups more than others. [8] (e) To what extent does poverty and unemployment explain criminal behaviour? [15] Section D: Media
35 marks
Mark scheme: 3(a) What is meant by the term ‘urban crime’? 2 One mark for partial definition, e.g. crime in the towns and cities. Two marks for clear definition, e.g. an illegal act committed in cities. 3(b) Describe two sociological explanations for crime, apart from 4 material deprivation. Possible answers: • Merton – strain theory – not everyone has equal chances to be successful in society; • Cohen – status frustration – for some people committing crime allows them to gain the status they cannot achieve in society; • Inadequate socialisation – not teaching individuals the correct norms and values; • New Right – crime committed by the underclass due to fatherless families and an over reliance on the welfare state; • Marxism – the law protects the interest of the ruling class meaning that the working class are criminalised; • Feminism – crime allows males to prove their masculinity; Marxism – relative deprivation in a consumer society; • Marginalisation/social exclusion – feeling powerless in society may lead to crime e.g. gang culture; • Interactionism – labelling certain social groups as criminals makes them more likely to commit crime via the self-fulfilling prophecy; • other reasonable response. One mark for each point correctly identified (up to maximum of two). One mark for each point that is developed (up to a maximum of two). 3(c) Explain how moral panics in the media can affect the public’s 6 view of crime and criminals. Possible answers: • most people have no direct experience of criminals and so rely on the media for their information; • sensationalism and exaggeration in the media affects how people think about crime; • media reporting causes the public to label certain groups as criminals and so stigmatises them e.g. folk devils; • Marxists believe moral panics divert the public's attention away from the real crime problem and criminals in society i.e. hidden white collar crime; • Cohen's study of the mods and rockers demonstrates how the public's perception of crime was influenced by a moral panic in the media; • moral panics may lead to an increased fear of crime in the public; • moral panics lead to the creation and promotion of stereotypes of who the criminals in society are e.g. underclass, ethnic minorities etc; • other reasonable response. Band 0 [0 marks] No creditworthy response. Band 1 [1–3 marks] Answers in this band will show only a limited awareness of the concept of moral panics and how they can change the public's perception of crime and may talk about e.g. ‘the media shows some people to be criminals’. Responses may be short and un/under developed. At the bottom of the band (1 mark), expect one weak point. Higher in the band (2–3 marks), candidates may offer more than one weak point, but there may be a tendency towards simplistic answers, engaging with sociological ideas without using sociological language. 3(c) Band 2 [4–6 marks] A clear and accurate explanation, showing good sociological knowledge and understanding of the relationship between moral panics and the public's perception of crime. Sociological terms and concepts should be expected e.g. ‘Sensationalist media reporting leads to the public stigmatising certain social groups as criminals.’ This would be followed by explanation of factors leading to this. At the bottom of the band, the range of points covered may be narrow or lack detail. Higher in the band, answers will cover more than one factor in a well-developed way or cover several factors in less detail. 3(d) Explain why the police appear to target some social groups 8 more than others. Possible answers: • Marxists believe the police are tools of the ruling class and so target those with less power in order to protect ruling class interests; • the police are affected by the stereotypes of criminals seen in the media through sensationalist reporting and moral panics; • police target those groups that according to the OCS (official crime statistics) commit the most crime e.g. young people; • Government may put pressure on the police to solve crime and targeting particular social groups is a means of doing this; • institutional racism may exist within the police force thus leading to the targeting of ethnic minorities; • the police force is still male dominated/patriarchal and so the chivalry factor may lead to the targeting of males over females; • some social groups are more likely to commit crime and this is why the police target them e.g. lower class; • other reasonable response. Band 0 [0 marks] No creditworthy response. Band 1 [1–3 marks] Answers in this band will show only a limited awareness of why the police target some social groups more than others. A tendency to description is likely. Responses may be short and undeveloped, e.g. ‘they are racist’ stated without explanation. Sociological terms and concepts are unlikely to be used. At the bottom of the band (1 mark), expect one weak point. Higher in the band (2–3 marks), candidates may offer more than one weak point. Band 2 [4–6 marks] Answers in this band will show basic sociological knowledge and understanding of why the police target some social groups more than others. Responses may be underdeveloped and lacking in range. e.g. ‘Police are affected by the stereotypes they see in the media.’ ‘The police focus on those people who the official crime statistics say commit crime’ etc . At the bottom of the band, candidates are unlikely to use sociological terms and concepts accurately. Higher in the band, candidates may be beginning to use sociological terms and concepts with greater accuracy. However, some aspects of the answer may only be partially developed/explained. 3(d) Band 3 [7–8 marks] Answers in this band will show good sociological knowledge and understanding of why the police target some social groups more than others and will be well developed and explained. e.g. ‘The police are thought by Marxists to be a tool of the ruling class, used to control the lower classes and protect the interests of the bourgeoisie. They therefore target the working class and ethnic minorities and so stigmatise them as criminals, particularly when this is picked up on by the media and reported in a sensationalist way – a moral panic’. They can then expand on the explanation of this and other factors as necessary. Sociological terms and concepts will be used accurately overall. Answers will be well focused on the question and there will be a range of reasons presented. At the top of the band explanations will be clear throughout. 3(e) To what extent does poverty and unemployment explain 15 criminal behaviour? Possible answers: For: • Merton – strain theory – there is a poor fit between the desired goals and the means to achieve them therefore crime may occur; • Cohen – status frustration – some social groups feel disadvantaged by inequalities in society (i.e. unemployment) and thus turn to crime; • Material deprivation – not having enough to live on may lead to crime; • Marxists believe workers are exploited in the workplace through low pay and insecure employment contracts and so commit crime both in frustration at the capitalist system and for financial gain; • relative deprivation – when groups/individuals feel they have less material goods than others in society they may turn to crime; • marginalisation – powerless groups i.e. the poor may feel 'pushed out' from mainstream society and unable to achieve legitimately therefore they commit crime; • Cloward and Ohlin – a lack of legitimate opportunity to be successful in society can cause poverty and deprivation and thus lead to criminal behaviour e.g. joining a gang; • other reasonable response. Against: • not all people who are poor/unemployed commit crime; not all crime committed is for financial gain; • labelling theory – people may commit crime because they have been negatively stereotyped as criminals and find themselves in a self fulfilling prophecy; • people may copy the glamorised criminals they see in the media and so commit crime; • masculinity – crime may be seen as a way to prove your masculinity e.g. gang crime; • postmodernism – crime is committed for thrills and excitement; • New Right – crime is caused through inadequate socialisation and a lack of social control; 3(e) • crime may be about power/control rather than poverty e.g. domestic violence; • crime may be caused through opportunity rather than poverty e.g. corruption/white-collar crime; • other reasonable response. Band 0 [0 marks] No creditworthy response. Band 1 [1–4 marks] Answers in this band may be vague and largely based on common sense showing limited knowledge of the extent to which poverty and unemployment explain criminal behaviour. Use of sociological terms or concepts is very unlikely. Responses may be short, undeveloped and one-sided. e.g. People commit crime because they are poor. If you haven't got a job you can’t get enough money to live. Lower in the band (1–2 marks), expect one or two weak points. Higher in the band (3–4 marks) candidates may offer more than two points or provide a weak definition of key terms, e.g. poverty is when you haven't got enough money, in the question. Band 2 [5–8 marks] In this band candidates will show some basic knowledge of the extent to which poverty and unemployment explain criminal behaviour. Alternatively, they may offer an answer which is list-like in nature but there will be no real attempt to assess the issues raised by the question. There may be limited/some use of sociological terms or concepts. Responses may be underdeveloped and lack range. Answers may be simplistic and two-sided responses are unlikely e.g. People get frustrated that they can't find a job and so turn to crime. Everyone wants material goods and possessions and if an individual can't afford them then they may turn to crime etc. Lower in the band, the response will be rather narrow in the points covered and there will be little development. Higher in the band, more points will be covered and there will be limited development of some points. Alternatively, a list-like answer with little development covering both sides of the argument may score up to 8 marks. 3(e) A one-sided answer cannot score higher than 8 marks. Band 3 [9–12 marks] Answers in this band will show good sociological knowledge and understanding of the extent to which poverty and unemployment explain criminal behaviour. Sociological terms and concepts will be used with greater accuracy and/or frequency. For the most part, answers will be well developed, focused on the question and there will be a range of points presented. Candidates may say that e.g. despite a lack of money possibly explaining crimes committed for financial gain i.e. robbery, this can't explain crimes of passion and revenge. Or frustration at an unfair system that does not allow everybody equal opportunities to be successful may be a crucial factor in explaining crime. There will be a two-sided response but this may be unbalanced. At the bottom of the band, candidates may provide a narrower range of well developed points. At the top of the band, expect a wider range of points and clear focus on the question. Band 4 [13–15 marks] Answers in this band will show excellent knowledge and understanding of the extent to which poverty and unemployment explain criminal behaviour. There will be a strong grasp of the argument as well as accurate and frequent use of sociological terms and concepts. Answers will be well developed, clearly focused on the question and discuss a wide range of points. Responses will be two-sided and balanced. At the bottom of the band (13 marks), the answer may lack a specific conclusion. Higher in the band, there will be a clear attempt to offer an assessment of the ‘To what extent«?’ part of the question through a focused conclusion. Candidates should show consideration of points for and against the idea of poverty and unemployment explaining crime, citing some of the examples given.
4 The media are constantly changing and new technologies allow the audience greater control over content. However, this does not mean that the media are no longer powerful. The media are still able to censor content and have been accused of both indoctrination and agenda setting. (a) What is meant by the term ‘indoctrination’? [2] (b) Describe two examples of censorship in the media. [4] (c) Explain how the media can set the agenda for what is seen to be important in society. [6] (d) Explain why feminists criticise the representation of women in the media. [8] (e) To what extent can the audience influence the content of the media? [15]
35 marks
Mark scheme: 4(a) What is meant by the term ‘indoctrination’? 2 One mark for partial definition, biased reporting Two marks for clear definition, passing ideas and information to people in a way that is accepted uncritically. 4(b) Describe two examples of censorship in the media. 4 Possible answers: • laws to protect the state/Government e.g. the UK Official Secrets Act; laws on obscenity; • laws to prevent discrimination e.g. anti-racism/sexism; laws of libel and slander; • certification systems used to control the content and distribution of films, computer games and music videos; • the television watershed which prevents sex, violence, bad language and drug use being shown before an agreed time; • self-censorship e.g. internet providers and websites can block or remove content; • Government can filter information e.g. China blocking Google; • other reasonable response. One mark for each point correctly identified (up to maximum of two). One mark for each point that is developed (up to a maximum of two). Candidates may give specific examples of censorship from the media on either a local or an international level or may give examples of what censorship is used for. Both are fine to credit. 4(c) Explain how the media can set the agenda for what is seen to be 6 important in society. Possible answers: • media gatekeepers control the public's access to information e.g. an editor decides which stories make the news; • media news values determine what is thought to make a good story and thus influences what the public do and don't hear about; • the news and the content of the media is socially constructed, reflecting media personnel’s decisions, beliefs and values rather than social reality; • how a story is presented in the media determines how it will be understood by the audience; • stories covered in the media become talked about in society – some are passed and used whereas others are rejected, this determines what is seen to be important; • Marxists believe that media owners and professionals share a similar background and outlook and that this influences what we see and hear in the media; • work by the GUMG shows the media to be biased and selective in determining what is seen to be important; • advertising is usually the main source of income for the privately owned media and therefore the need to appeal to advertisers may well set the agenda for media content; • other reasonable response. Band 0 [0 marks] No creditworthy response. Band 1 [1–3 marks] Answers in this band will show only a limited awareness of the idea that the media can set the agenda for what is seen to be important in society and may talk about ‘what the media cover’. Responses may be short and un/under developed. At the bottom of the band (1 mark), expect one weak point. Higher in the band (2–3 marks), candidates may offer more than one weak point, but there may be a tendency towards simplistic answers, engaging with sociological ideas without using sociological language. Band 2 [4–6 marks] A clear and accurate explanation, showing good sociological knowledge and understanding of the idea that the media can set the agenda for what is seen to be important in society. Sociological terms and concepts should be expected ‘the media manipulates people into believing that they have a choice by only presenting them with certain options and viewpoints and thus ensuring that we don't vote for radical changes.’ This would be followed by explanation of factors leading to this. At the bottom of the band, the range of points covered may be narrow or lack detail. Higher in the band, answers will cover more than one factor in a well-developed way or cover several factors in less detail. 4(d) Explain why feminists criticise the representation of women in the 8 media. Possible answers: • media effects models such as the hypodermic needle suggest that the audience are directly influenced by how women are represented in the media; • feminists believe the media is still a patriarchal institution owned and controlled by men and thus represents women from a male viewpoint; • the male gaze is thought to exist in the media, whereby the media 'eyes a woman up' as if through a man's eyes; • females are thought to be underrepresented (in most areas of the media) • females are thought to be shown in a narrow range of roles; • females are often shown in a way that emphasises their physical appearance; • images of women in the media are often digitally enhanced to create an appearance that is not attainable in real life – can be linked to issues such as anorexia etc.; • females are still often shown as passive, weak and helpless – needing a man to help them; • males and females are not treated equally in the media; • other reasonable response. Band 0 [0 marks] No creditworthy response. Band 1 [1–3 marks] Answers in this band will show only a limited awareness of why feminists criticise the representation of women in the media. A tendency to description is likely. Responses may be short and undeveloped, ‘women are shown as sex symbols’ stated without explanation. Sociological terms and concepts are unlikely to be used. At the bottom of the band (1 mark), expect one weak point. Higher in the band (2–3 marks), candidates may offer more than one weak point. Band 2 [4–6 marks] Answers in this band will show basic sociological knowledge and understanding of why feminists criticise the representation of women in the media. Responses may be underdeveloped and lacking in range. ‘The media is thought to be patriarchal and does not represent men and women in the same way.’ ‘Females are represented in stereotypical ways that leave them in a narrow range of roles’ etc. At the bottom of the band, candidates are unlikely to use sociological terms and concepts accurately. Higher in the band, candidates may be beginning to use sociological terms and concepts with greater accuracy. However, some aspects of the answer may only be partially developed/ explained. 4(d) Band 3 [7–8 marks] Answers in this band will show good sociological knowledge and understanding of why feminists criticise the representation of women in the media and will be well developed and explained. ‘Women in the media are still very under-represented and are typically shown in a narrow range of stereotypical roles. The emphasis is often on a woman's appearance and digital editing is frequently used to create an unrealistic impression of what a woman is like’. They can then expand on the explanation of this and other factors as necessary. Sociological terms and concepts will be used accurately overall. Answers will be well focused on the question and there will be a range of reasons presented. At the top of the band explanations will be clear throughout. 4(e) To what extent can the audience influence the content of the media? 15 Possible answers: For: • Pluralist ideas that the media is shaped by the audience - the media have to give the audience what they want in order to survive and remain viable; • audiences can use new media technologies to create their own media products and upload these to the internet; • the audience can use interactive technologies to determine the content of the media e.g. voting on reality TV shows; • audiences can comment on the media via blogs, chat rooms and forums etc.; • citizen journalism is now the norm and allows the audience to create and shape the media; • active audience models of media effects demonstrate that the audience can interpret the media in various different ways and so determine content; • other reasonable response. Against: • it is the media owners and corporations that determine the content of the media, not the audience; • media professionals (editors, journalists etc.) decide on media content, not the audience; • media effects models such as the hypodermic syringe show that the media has a direct influence on the audience through its content; • news values are thought to determine media content as they are what the media believe will appeal and sell; • Marxists believe that the media convey the dominant ideologies in order to indoctrinate the audience into a particular point of view; • the media are thought to divert people away from the important issues in society through a content of trivia and gossip; • censorship in the media demonstrates that the audience do not control media content; • the digital divide means that not all audience members have the same opportunities to influence media content; • the importance of advertising revenue to the media industry means that many believe it is the advertisers who control media content e.g. the content of the media must attract a mass audience in order to appeal to the advertisers; • other reasonable response. Candidates should demonstrate the ways that the audience can influence media content and are likely to focus on new media technologies in their discussion. Ideas that the media is still controlled by owners and media professionals are also likely to be considered in evaluation. 4(e) Band 0 [0 marks] No creditworthy response. Band 1 [1–4 marks] Answers in this band may be vague and largely based on common sense showing limited knowledge of the extent to which the audience can influence the content of the media. Use of sociological terms or concepts is very unlikely. Responses may be short, undeveloped and one-sided. The audience can decide who wins a competition by online voting. People can write their own blogs now. Lower in the band (1–2 marks), expect one or two weak points. Higher in the band (3–4 marks) candidates may offer more than two points or provide a weak definition of key terms, the audience are the people who watch and listen to the media, in the question. Band 2 [5–8 marks] In this band candidates will show some basic knowledge of the extent to which the audience can influence the content of the media. Alternatively, they may offer an answer which is list-like in nature but there will be no real attempt to assess the issues raised by the question. There may be limited/some use of sociological terms or concepts. Responses may be underdeveloped and lack range. Answers may be simplistic and two-sided responses are unlikely Digital technology makes it easier for the audience to produce their own media content and distribute it to others. The audience can write their own blogs on the internet etc. Lower in the band, the response will be rather narrow in the points covered and there will be little development. Higher in the band, more points will be covered and there will be limited development of some points. Alternatively, a list-like answer with little development covering both sides of the argument may score up to 8 marks. A one-sided answer cannot score higher than 8 marks. Band 3 [9–12 marks] Answers in this band will show good sociological knowledge and understanding of the extent to which the audience can influence the content of the media. Sociological terms and concepts will be used with greater accuracy and/or frequency. For the most part, answers will be well developed, focused on the question and there will be a range of points presented. Candidates may say that despite more opportunities being available for the audience to create media content, ultimately most media output is created by global media corporations. Or For younger people there are many possible ways to influence media content through digital technologies and interactive media. For elderly people, however, there remains a large digital divide. There will be a two-sided response but this may be unbalanced. At the bottom of the band, candidates may provide a narrower range of well-developed points. At the top of the band, expect a wider range of points and clear focus on the question. 4(e) Band 4 [13–15 marks] Answers in this band will show excellent knowledge and understanding of the extent to which the audience can influence the content of the media. There will be a strong grasp of the argument as well as accurate and frequent use of sociological terms and concepts. Answers will be well developed, clearly focused on the question and discuss a wide range of points. Responses will be two-sided and balanced. At the bottom of the band (13 marks), the answer may lack a specific conclusion. Higher in the band, there will be a clear attempt to offer an assessment of the ‘To what extent«?’ part of the question through a focused conclusion. Candidates should show consideration of points for and against the idea of the audience being able to influence the content of the media, citing some of the examples given.
2 There are several reasons why different social groups do better than others in education. Some believe this is due to the peer group, whereas others refer to school factors such as the self- fulfilling prophecy and the hidden curriculum. Whether the education system today offers students equality of opportunity remains a matter of debate. (a) What is meant by the term ‘self-fulfilling prophecy’? [2] (b) Describe two criticisms of IQ tests. [4] (c) Explain how the hidden curriculum controls pupils. [6] (d) Explain why some sociologists believe that selective education is unfair. [8] (e) To what extent is the peer group the most influential factor in determining educational achievement? [15] Section C: Crime, deviance and social control
35 marks
Mark scheme: 2(a) What is meant by the term ‘self-fulfilling prophecy’? 2 When people act in the way they have been expected to and so make that expectation come true. One mark for partial definition, e.g. do what others expect. Two marks for clear definition, e.g. acting up to the label given and making that label come true. 2(b) Describe two criticisms of IQ tests. 4 Candidates will describe two different criticisms of IQ tests. Possible answers: • If intelligence is linked to environmental factors, then a high score in the test may simply reflect a more stimulating environment in early childhood and not any innate ability. • IQ tests are based on a narrow range of reasoning skills and therefore exclude other types of intelligence – they don’t show the full picture. • IQ tests are written by people who inevitably build their own cultural norms and assumptions into the tests – this means those from other cultures are likely to find the test more difficult. • IQ tests reflect just one moment in time, but intelligence is developmental, so the scores should not be used to predict future achievement. • Timed conditions of IQ tests means there is no time for thought and reflection, which can cause some respondents to under-perform. • Performance in IQ tests can be affected by factors such as being nervous, feeling ill etc.; • Performance in IQ tests is found to improve with practice – many parents therefore get their children to repeat and practice the tests in order that they score high marks. • Some people who score low in the IQ tests go on to do well in their education and their career, whereas others who get high scores do not always succeed in later life. • Other reasonable response. One mark for each point correctly identified (up to maximum of two). One mark for each point that is developed (up to maximum of two). 2(c) Explain how the hidden curriculum controls pupils. 6 Candidates are likely to show an understanding of different types of sanctions used by schools, as well as discussing various aspects of the hidden curriculum. How these sanctions lead to student conformity (following the rules, doing what’s expected etc.) may also be discussed. Possible answers: • Informal sanctions such as glares, warnings and body language let children know whether their behaviour and actions are approved or disapproved of. • Pupils learn norms, values, beliefs and attitudes through their school experiences. • Classrooms are usually set out with the teacher at the front and the children seated – this sends out the message that the teacher has the power and is in control. • Rewards – children like to receive praise and therefore may do as they’re told by teachers in order to receive stickers, positive contact with home, merit rewards etc. • Schools are hierarchies and pupils soon learn their position in the hierarchy and conform accordingly. • Competitive sports and testing children sends out the message that doing better than others is more important than cooperating with them. • The importance of punctuality and being on time is soon learnt through schools. • Schools have rules that are enforced by teachers, sending out the message that you have to do what you are told by those in authority, whether you agree or not. • Marxists believe that the hidden curriculum maintains the ruling classes control of the lower classes through ideology (capitalism). • Marxists believe working class children are indoctrinated through education to learn a set of values that will make them good workers in the capitalist system, e.g. not questioning commands from a superior, learning the importance of punctuality. • Feminists see the hidden curriculum as conveying patriarchal values and norms, so teaching and reinforcing stereotypical and different expectations of each gender. • Other reasonable response. Band 0 No creditworthy response. Band 1 (1–3) Answers in this band will show only a limited awareness of how the hidden curriculum controls pupils. Responses may be short and un- /underdeveloped. Description is likely. At the bottom of the band (1 mark), expect one weak point. Higher in the band (2–3 marks), candidates may offer more than one weak point, but there may be a tendency towards simplistic answers, engaging with sociological ideas without using sociological language, e.g. ‘Students soon learn that when they don’t do what those in power want them to do, they get told off and punished.’ 2(c) Band 2 (4–6) A clear and accurate explanation showing good sociological knowledge and understanding of how the hidden curriculum controls pupils. Sociological terms and concepts should be expected. Candidates may discuss for example: ‘the learning of norms and values; authority, secondary socialisation; Marxism, patriarchy.’ At the bottom of the band, the range of points covered may be narrow or lack detail. Higher in the band, answers will cover more than one factor in a well-developed way, or cover several factors in less detail. 2(d) Explain why some sociologists believe that selective education is 8 unfair. Candidates should show understanding of the various reasons why some sociologists believe that selective education is unfair. Candidates may talk about different types of schools within their response. Candidates may talk about trends to do with ethnicity, gender, religion and social class, or may approach the question in more general terms. It is likely that private (paid for) schools and/or grammar schools (11+ exams) will be the focus of the candidate’s answer. Possible reasons: • Private schools have smaller class sizes and better facilities than state schools, which may advantage the students there in terms of educational achievement. • Teacher expectations – students are expected to work hard and do well in private schools and thus are pushed towards this. • Most parents cannot afford private schools – it is unfair that the rich can buy a better education. • Examination results in private schools are better than those in non- selective education. • The elite private schools spend about four times as much a year on each student as state schools do. • Private schools play an important role in ensuring that the higher classes can pass on their privileges to their children – maintaining the old boy network. • Research shows that even when children who go to private schools get worse examination results than those in state schools, they still go on to get better jobs. • Elite universities, e.g. Oxford and Cambridge, still recruit primarily from the private sector, and it is through attendance at such universities that individuals are able to access the elite jobs in society. • Selective education effectively means that wealthy parents can almost guarantee their children will have well paid future careers, which undermines any principles of equality; • Cultural and economic capital of the higher classes means they are more likely to pass selection tests for entry to private schools/elite universities. • Faith schools may not be aiding multiculturalism (segregation). • Single sex schools may be reinforcing patriarchy (feminism). • Other reasonable response. 2(d) Band 0 No creditworthy response. Band 1 (1–3) Answers in this band will show only a limited awareness of why some sociologists believe that selective education is unfair. Responses may be short and undeveloped, e.g. ‘buying an education’, without justification. Sociological terms and concepts are unlikely to be used. At the bottom of the band (1 mark), expect one weak point. Higher in the band (2–3 marks), candidates may offer more than one weak point. Band 2 (4–6) Answers in this band will show basic sociological knowledge and understanding of why some sociologists believe that selective education is unfair. Responses may be underdeveloped and lacking in range. Answers may concentrate on only a few factors such as, ‘selective education maintains the elite position of power’ or ‘private schools get the best examination results’ and so be a little narrow. At the bottom of the band, candidates are unlikely to use sociological terms and concepts accurately. Higher in the band, candidates may be beginning to use sociological terms and concepts with greater accuracy. However, some aspects of the answer may only be partially developed. Band 3 (7–8) Answers in this band will show good sociological knowledge and understanding of why some sociologists believe that selective education is unfair, and will be well-developed and explained, e.g. ‘Private schools are funded by parents, meaning that the schools have a lot of money and can afford to provide small class sizes for their students. This can lead to better educational performance as students have more one-to-one attention. Parents value educational success and have high levels of cultural capital, which favours these students over others. Students from private schools are more likely to attend elite universities and to then get the high flying and well-paid jobs in society’. Sociological terms and concepts will be used accurately, overall. Answers will be well focused on the question and there will be a range of reasons presented. At the top of the band, explanations will be clear throughout. 2(e) To what extent is the peer group the most influential factor in 15 determining educational achievement? Candidates should show an awareness of the various influences on educational achievement such as the peer group, home factors and school factors. Possible answers: For • Some students develop an anti-school subculture which provides students with a means to improve their own self esteem by giving them status within their peer group. • A culture of masculinity may form in counter-school cultures which causes these peers to disrupt the smooth running and learning of the school. • Peer pressure – young people want to fit in and thus the pressure from their peers (either positive or negative) may well determine how well they achieve at school, i.e. attitudes to homework, discipline, attendance. • Imitation – some children may copy their peers in order to conform and this can be either negative or positive: this is likely to affect educational achievement. • Sometimes pupils from ethnic minority groups are labelled as failures and placed in low sets and streams. These peer groups may then develop a shared set of values and develop a self- fulfilling prophecy. • Girls’ peer groups are more likely than those of boys to conform to school values and so to be successful in education. • Peer groups outside school may influence educational achievement e.g. gang culture. • Other reasonable response. 2(e) Against • Gender, not peer group, may be the most important factor in determining educational success. • Ethnicity, not peer group, may be the most important factor in determining educational success. • Social class, not peer group, may be the most important factor in determining educational success. • Home factors may be more important than the peer group, i.e. material/cultural deprivation / parental values and expectations. • School factors may be more important than the peer group, i.e. teacher stereotyping and labelling/setting and streaming/type of school attended. • Marxists would argue that educational success will always be more likely to be achieved by the higher social classes, as education simply reinforces the inequalities seen in society. • Linguistic codes – Bernstein argues that schools operate with an elaborate code which is also shared by the higher social classes. This makes educational achievement more likely for the higher social classes than the lower classes, who use a restricted code. • Functionalists would argue that the education system is fair and based on meritocracy, allowing all who work hard to be successful – only individuals, therefore, can be responsible for their own educational success or failure. • Other reasonable response. Band 0 No creditworthy response. Band 1 (1–4) Answers in this band may be vague and largely based on common sense, showing limited knowledge of whether the peer group is the most influential factor in determining educational achievement. Use of sociological terms or concepts is very unlikely. Responses may be short, undeveloped and one- sided, e.g. ‘children copy their peers’. Lower in the band (1–2 marks), expect one or two weak points. Higher in the band (3–4 marks), candidates may offer more than two points or provide a weak definition of key terms, e.g. ‘a peer group are people who share a similar social position’, in the question. Band 2 (5–8) In this band candidates will show some basic knowledge of whether the peer group is the most influential factor in determining educational achievement. Alternatively, they may offer an answer which is list-like in nature, but there will be no real attempt to assess the issues raised by the question. There may be limited use of sociological terms or concepts. Responses may be underdeveloped and lack range. Answers may be simplistic and two-sided responses are unlikely. Lower in the band, the response will be rather narrow in the points covered and there will be little development. Higher in the band, more points will be covered and there will be limited development of some points, for example ‘peer pressure is rife in schools and can be either negative or positive’. Alternatively, a list-like answer with little development, covering both sides of the argument, may score up to 8 marks. 2(e) A one-sided answer cannot score higher than 8 marks. Band 3 (9–12) Answers in this band will show good sociological knowledge and understanding of whether the peer group is the most influential factor in determining educational achievement. Sociological terms and concepts will be used with greater accuracy and/or frequency. For the most part, answers will be well developed, focused on the question and there will be a range of points presented. There will be a two-sided response but this may be unbalanced. At the bottom of the band, candidates may provide a narrower range of well-developed points. At the top of the band, expect a wider range of points and clear focus on the question. Candidates may outline that for example, ‘The peer group is an important factor in determining educational success in schools. Research shows that ethnic minority males are most likely to form anti-school sub-cultures and that this negatively impacts upon their achievements’. Band 4 (13–15) Answers in this band will show excellent knowledge and understanding of whether the peer group is the most influential factor in determining educational achievement. There will be a strong grasp of the argument, as well as accurate and frequent use of sociological terms and concepts. Answers will be well developed, clearly focused on the question and discuss a wide range of points. Candidates may outline and discuss different explanations for educational achievement, e.g. ‘hidden curriculum, teacher labelling, parental values and expectations, gender roles’. Responses will be two-sided and balanced. At the bottom of the band (13 marks), the answer may lack a specific conclusion. Higher in the band, there will be a clear attempt to offer an assessment of the ‘To what extent«?’ part of the question through a focused conclusion. Candidates should show consideration of points for and against the idea of whether the peer group is the most influential factor in determining educational achievement, citing some of the examples given. Section C: Crime, deviance and social control
3 Official crime statistics are one way of measuring crime rates. This helps the Government to decide on effective punishments to control crime levels in society. However, they do not account for the dark figure of crime and so their accuracy can be questioned. (a) What is meant by the term ‘dark figure of crime’? [2] (b) Describe two formal agencies of social control. [4] (c) Explain how community sentencing is an effective punishment for crime. [6] (d) Explain why some people adopt a deviant career. [8] (e) To what extent do official crime statistics provide an accurate picture of crime? [15] Section D: Media
35 marks
Mark scheme: 3(a) What is meant by the term ‘dark figure of crime’? 2 The unknown number of crimes committed that are not included in the official statistics. One mark for partial definition, e.g. crime not reported. Two marks for clear definition, e.g. unreported and unrecorded crimes that do not appear in the official statistics. 3(b) Describe two formal agencies of social control. 4 Candidates will describe two formal agencies of social control. Informal agencies should not be credited. Possible answers: • Government – make the laws that determine what is considered criminal. • Police – have the power of arrest and act as enforcers of the laws; a public deterrent. • Armed forces – can use physical force and weaponry to ensure conformity to the law. • Prison/the penal system – takes away an individual’s freedom as punishment for non-conformity to the law; keeps criminals out of society. • The judiciary/courts – decide whether an individual is guilty or not guilty and appropriate sentences for guilty parties. • Other reasonable response. One mark for each point correctly identified (up to maximum of two). One mark for each point that is developed (up to maximum of two). 3(c) Explain how community sentencing is an effective punishment for 6 crime. Candidates need to demonstrate an understanding of the ways in which community sentencing can be an effective punishment for crime. Possible answers: • It is a cheaper alternative to the penal system. • It makes offenders give something back to the community that they have committed crimes against. • It can often be a public punishment, e.g. offenders in public wearing a ‘uniform’ deters others from committing crime and humiliates the offender. • Rehabilitation – makes offenders realise there are consequences for their actions. • Often thought to be a fair system of punishment – the punishment fits the crime, i.e. if you vandalise a park you will be made to clean that park. • Specific examples of community sentencing may be discussed in terms of its effectiveness, e.g. tagging, curfews, community service. • Other reasonable response. Band 0 No creditworthy response. Band 1 (1–3) Answers in this band will show only a limited awareness of how community sentencing is an effective punishment for crime. Responses may be short and un-/underdeveloped. Candidates may be confused as to what is meant by community sentencing. At the bottom of the band (1 mark), expect one weak point. Higher in the band (2–3 marks), candidates may offer more than one weak point, but there may be a tendency towards simplistic answers, engaging with sociological ideas without using sociological language, e.g. ‘ways of making people make up for the crime they have committed’. Band 2 (4–6) A clear and accurate explanation showing good sociological knowledge and understanding of how community sentencing is an effective punishment for crime. Sociological terms and concepts should be expected. Candidates may refer to public safety, rehabilitation, consequences, deterrence, fair justice etc. with examples. At the bottom of the band, the range of points covered may be narrow or lack detail. Higher in the band, answers will cover more than one factor in a well-developed way, or cover several factors in less detail. 3(d) Explain why some people adopt a deviant career. 8 Candidates need to identify what is meant by the term ‘deviant career’ and explain why they are adopted. Candidates may focus on specific social groups here (ethnic minorities, males, the working class etc.) or engage with more general theoretical explanations. These are all fine to credit. Possible answers: • Increasing role of a global media in society means that a wide variety of images and definitions of deviant/criminal youth can be seen, resulting in imitation and role modelling amongst people, e.g. copying criminal behaviour that is seen. • Gang culture – being in a gang involves the adoption of criminal and deviant behaviour, norms and values. • Status frustration – criminal youth sub-cultures may exist in order for some people to gain the status they crave in a society where they don’t feel they get much status. • Sociologist, David Matza, talks about young people ‘drifting’ into criminal sub-cultures. The idea that this is a phase in their life when they have few responsibilities and so can experiment with new norms and values in this stage of transition – crime being one such thing. • A lack of social control in society may lead to a state of anomie in which crime and deviance occur. • Resistance and rebellion – criminal youth sub-cultures are typically dominated by working class ethnic minority males and have been explained by Marxist sociologists as an opportunity for disadvantaged people to express their dissatisfaction with society, and all the pressures to consume that it places upon them through crime. • Excitement – Postmodern sociologists in particular talk about people joining criminal sub-cultures in order to engage in thrill seeking and risk taking behaviour, i.e. joy-riding. • Culture of masculinity – males are socialised through several agencies into the need to prove their masculinity; criminal behaviour is one way to do so. • Labelling theory – people are stereotyped as criminals and targeted by the police and thus this may become their master status via a self-fulfilling prophecy. • Peer group pressure – people may be pressured into criminal behaviour and activities by their peer group. • Criminal socialisation – people in certain localities and environments may grow up learning criminal norms and values, i.e. the illegitimate opportunity structure or through the family. • Unemployment / lack of legitimate opportunity / poverty – people may find it hard to get work and thus turn to crime for the money they need (Marxism). • Other reasonable response. 3(d) Band 0 No creditworthy response. Band 1 (1–3) Answers in this band will show only a limited awareness of why some people adopt a deviant career. Candidates may not fully understand what is meant by a deviant career. Responses may be short and undeveloped, e.g. ‘some people have little money and so turn to crime’. Sociological terms and concepts are unlikely to be used. At the bottom of the band (1 mark), expect one weak point. Higher in the band (2–3 marks), candidates may offer more than one weak point. Band 2 (4–6) Answers in this band will show basic sociological knowledge and understanding of why some people adopt a deviant career. Candidates may say that, e.g. ‘the media promote the ‘gangsta’ lifestyle as glamorous and exciting and so some people copy the deviant role models that they see’. Responses may be underdeveloped and lacking in range. At the bottom of the band, candidates are unlikely to use sociological terms and concepts accurately. Higher in the band, candidates may be beginning to use sociological terms and concepts with greater accuracy. However, some aspects of the answer may only be partially developed. Band 3 (7–8) Answers in this band will show good sociological knowledge and understanding of why some people adopt a deviant career and will be well developed and explained. Candidates may discuss specific sociological theories such as Marxism, culture of masculinity, drift theory, Postmodernism etc. Sociological terms and concepts will be used accurately, overall. Answers will be well focused on the question and there will be a range of reasons presented. At the top of the band explanations will be clear throughout. 3(e) To what extent do official crime statistics provide an accurate picture 15 of crime? Candidates need to show an understanding of whether official crime statistics provide an accurate picture of crime. Candidates may focus on advantages and disadvantages of the crime statistics and/or consider alternative ways of measuring crime within their response. Either approach should be credited. It is unlikely that a balanced argument will be seen for this essay – this should not disadvantage candidates. Possible answers: For: • Official crime statistics are updated regularly and so provide an up- to-date picture of crime. • Official crime statistics are taken from official reports and records from the formal agencies and are therefore a reliable source of information. • The statistics provide a national picture and are therefore representative and generalisable. • Official crime statistics allow comparisons to be made with previous years to discover trends in crime. • Official statistics help the police and Government to prioritise crimes to target and areas to focus their attentions on. • Official crime statistics are easily accessible and so provide the public, often via the media, with information on crime patterns. • Governments are seen as trustworthy and therefore it is perceived that the picture of crime they provide is accurate. • Other reasonable response. 3(e) Against: • The crime statistics are a social construction according to Interpretivists – they tell us more about the decisions made by those who compile the statistics than about the actual, real picture of crime. • Crime statistics may not give a valid picture of crime because they can be manipulated by Government sources – political bias. • Not all crime is reported by the public to the police, e.g. rape and embarrassment. • Not every criminal act is thought of as criminal by the victim e.g. illegal music downloading; therefore it’s not in the official statistics. • Not all crimes that are reported by the public are recorded by the police, e.g. petty crime. • Some social groups are more likely than others to be targeted by the police and so are more likely to be found committing criminal acts and therefore are more likely to be in the official crime statistics. • Not everyone is treated the same by the courts and so some social groups are more likely to be found guilty of a crime than others, e.g. chivalry thesis, institutional racism. • Victim surveys reveal a different picture of crime than that seen in the crime statistics. • Self-report studies show a different picture of offenders than that found in the crime statistics. • The crime statistics hide a large dark figure of crime. • White collar crimes and sexual crimes are notoriously under- represented in the crime statistics (tip of the iceburg). • Other reasonable response. Band 0 No creditworthy response. Band 1 (1–4) Answers in this band may be vague and largely based on common sense, showing limited knowledge of whether the official crime statistics show an accurate picture of crime. Use of sociological terms or concepts is very unlikely. Responses may be short, undeveloped and one-sided, e.g. ‘crime statistics are kept up to date’. Lower in the band (1–2 marks), expect one or two weak points. Higher in the band (3–4 marks), candidates may offer more than two points or provide a weak definition of key terms, e.g. ‘the official crime statistics are the official figures to show the number of crimes and offenders’, as in the question. 3(e) Band 2 (5–8) In this band candidates will show some basic knowledge of whether the official crime statistics show an accurate picture of crime. Alternatively, they may offer an answer which is list-like in nature but there will be no real attempt to assess the issues raised by the question. There may be limited use of sociological terms or concepts. Candidates may discuss some reasons why the official crime statistics do show an accurate picture of crime, i.e. ‘based on factual records, compiled by recognised and trustworthy sources’,. but responses may be underdeveloped and lack range. Answers may be simplistic and two-sided responses are unlikely. Lower in the band, the response will be rather narrow in the points covered and there will be little development. Higher in the band, more points will be covered and there will be limited development of some points. Alternatively, a list-like answer with little development covering both sides of the argument may score up to 8 marks. A one-sided answer cannot score higher than 8 marks. Band 3 (9–12) Answers in this band will show good sociological knowledge and understanding of whether the official crime statistics show an accurate picture of crime. Sociological terms and concepts will be used with greater accuracy and/or frequency. For the most part, answers will be well developed, focused on the question and there will be a range of points presented. Candidates may be able to present a range of points to support the idea that the official crime statistics show an accurate picture of crime, but also be aware of some of the arguments against this, i.e. ‘not all crimes are reported, not all crimes are recorded by the police, the dark figure of crime’. There will be a two-sided response, but this may be unbalanced. At the bottom of the band, candidates may provide a narrower range of well- developed points. At the top of the band, expect a wider range of points and clear focus on the question. Band 4 (13–15) Answers in this band will show excellent knowledge and understanding of whether the official crime statistics show an accurate picture of crime. There will be a strong grasp of the argument, as well as accurate and frequent use of sociological terms and concepts. Answers will be well developed, clearly focused on the question and discuss a wide range of points. For example, candidates may say that ‘the crime statistics provide an accurate picture of crime because they are based on official police and court figures of recognised crimes. However, there are a number of crimes that do not appear in the statistics and many sociologists believe they merely show the tip of the iceberg. Not everyone has the same chance of appearing in the official crime statistics and so Interpretivist sociologists often claim that they are socially constructed and invalid.’. Responses will be two-sided and balanced. At the bottom of the band (13 marks), the answer may lack a specific conclusion. Higher in the band, there will be a clear attempt to offer an assessment of the ‘To what extent«?’ part of the question through a focused conclusion. Candidates should show consideration of points for and against the idea of whether the official crime statistics show an accurate picture of crime, citing some of the examples given. Section D: Media
4 The media are thought to be a very powerful agency of socialisation that can affect the audience’s attitudes and behaviour. The traditional media have been accused of creating and reinforcing stereotypical representations, but many believe that these are now beginning to change. (a) What is meant by the term ‘traditional media’? [2] (b) Describe two media gatekeepers. [4] (c) Explain how different social groups use the media differently. [6] (d) Explain why developments in new media are changing how social groups are represented. [8] (e) To what extent do the media affect voting patterns? [15]
35 marks
Mark scheme: 4(a) What is meant by the term ‘traditional media’? 2 Print and other, older media, such as film and radio, that have little, if any, interactivity. One mark for partial definition, e.g. magazines. Two marks for clear definition, e.g. old media where there is a one way channel of communication between the producer and a mass audience as seen in TV. 4(b) Describe two media gatekeepers. 4 Candidates will describe two media gatekeepers. These may take the form of a general response or be specific examples of gatekeepers. Either way is fine to credit. Gatekeepers – individuals who control the audience’s access to media information. If two separate and distinct examples are used from the same bullet point, this is fine to credit. Possible answers: • Owners, i.e. Rupert Murdoch/Berlusconi • Editors – of news programmes etc. deciding which stories to include e.g. newsworthiness. • Reporters – deciding what to cover; what to include in the coverage – news values etc. • Advertisers – media companies have to tailor their content to appeal to advertisers. • Audience – make their own decisions on what to consume. • Media conglomerates and corporations, e.g. Disney • Government – censorship, laws and propaganda • Political spin doctors – control a politician’s image and representation. • Other reasonable response. One mark for each point correctly identified (up to maximum of two). One mark for each point developed (up to maximum of two). 4(c) Explain how different social groups use the media differently. 6 Candidates need to demonstrate an understanding of what is meant by different social groups, e.g. based on gender, age, ethnicity and social class. Candidates may choose to cover a wide range of these groups in their answer, or may focus on a smaller number in more detail, e.g. look at social class and consider the different consumption patterns of the working, middle and upper classes. Possible answers: • Males use computer games and new technologies more than females. • Men and women prefer different genres of TV and films, e.g. females consume more soap operas and males more documentaries/sport. • Males are more likely than females to decide on what is to be consumed, and to control recording and streaming devices. • The amount of TV watched increases after the age of 50; • Younger people are more likely than older consumers to engage with new media technologies and user-generated content – the digital divide. • Younger people typically go to the cinema more than older people. • Different social classes read different types of newspapers – typically tabloids for the lower social classes and broadsheets for the higher classes. • The lower social classes tend to watch more light entertainment than the higher social classes, who watch more niche/specialist programmes and channels. • Ethnic minority and immigrant groups are likely to consume more media from their country of origin than majority groups. • Other reasonable response. 4(c) Band 0 No creditworthy response. Band 1 (1–3) Answers in this band will show only a limited awareness of how different social groups use the media differently. Responses may be short and un- /underdeveloped. At the bottom of the band (1 mark), expect one weak point. Higher in the band (2–3 marks), candidates may offer more than one weak point, but there may be a tendency towards simplistic answers, engaging with sociological ideas without using sociological language, e.g. ‘tabloid newspapers are more likely to be read by males and the lower social classes.’ Band 2 (4–6) A clear and accurate explanation showing good sociological knowledge and understanding of how different social groups use the media differently. For example, discussing how males are more likely than females to choose what to watch on TV, how younger groups are more like to engage with interactive new media than older age groups etc. Sociological language and concepts should be expected. At the bottom of the band, the range of points covered may be narrow or lack detail. Higher in the band, answers will cover more than one factor in a well-developed way or cover several factors in less detail. 4(d) Explain why developments in new media are changing how social 8 groups are represented. Candidates should show an awareness of different social groups in the media such as males, the disabled, the elderly etc. and consider why the way these groups are typically represented is changing. This should be linked to developments in new media. Candidates may answer the question in a general way or may focus their discussion more specifically on particular social groups, e.g. youth, females, with specific examples. Possible answers: • Representations in new media mirror social reality and thus when society changes, so does the way the media reflects this, e.g. more working women in society, equals more working women seen in the media – linked to the Pluralist idea of the media giving the audience what they want. • The new media is now global, meaning that a diverse range of representations can be seen and accessed easily, which promotes social change – globalisation and diversity. • The rise of the new media means that the audience are actively involved in creating the representations that we see, rather than these being produced by media owners – interactivity. • Social attitudes and norms are changing and thus the media must reflect this to remain popular, e.g. positive representations of disabled people. • There is less broadcasting and more narrowcasting in new media today, meaning that niche audiences are catered for, which allows for greater diversity in media content and representations. • Owners of the media are no longer just a small, elite group in society, but instead are more diverse and in the new media could be said to be the audience members as well – these differences are reflected in the greater range of representations that are now commonly found in the media. • Changes in the law means that certain representations that were once commonplace are now considered unacceptable – new media must avoid these and offer something new in order to avoid public complaints and litigation, e.g. sexism/racism/ageism. • New media allows the audience to actively comment upon, change, challenge and create the representations of social groups (blogs, social media etc.) • Other reasonable response. 4(d) Band 0 No creditworthy response. Band 1 (1–3) Answers in this band will show only a limited awareness of why representations of different social groups in the media are changing. Candidates may not really understand what is meant by ‘different social groups’. Responses may be short and undeveloped, e.g. ‘attitudes of the audience are changing’, without justification/explanation. Sociological terms and concepts are unlikely to be used. At the bottom of the band (1 mark), expect one weak point. Higher in the band (2–3 marks), candidates may offer more than one weak point. Band 2 (4–6) Answers in this band will show basic sociological knowledge and understanding of why representations of different social groups in the media are changing. Responses may be underdeveloped and lacking in range. Candidates may explain some of the reasons, e.g. changing social attitudes, rise of the new media and user generated content, greater media diversity and choice. At the bottom of the band, candidates are unlikely to use sociological terms and concepts accurately. Higher in the band, candidates may be beginning to use sociological terms and concepts with greater accuracy. However, some aspects of the answer may only be partially developed. Band 3 (7–8) Answers in this band will show good sociological knowledge and understanding of why representations of different social groups in the media are changing and will be well developed and explained. Sociological terms and concepts will be used accurately, overall. Answers will be well focused on the question and there will be a range of reasons presented, e.g. ‘in order to remain popular and viable, the media must give the audience what it wants to see, according to the Pluralists. This means that when social attitudes change, so must the media representations. It is no longer acceptable, for example, to simply show a female in the housewife role’. At the top of the band, explanations will be clear throughout. 4(e) To what extent do the media affect voting patterns? 15 Candidates will need to look at a range of different ways that the media can affect voting patterns. Different types of media may be referred to in a candidate’s answers. Specific examples of voting patterns and outcomes may be discussed. These may be related to the candidate’s own cultural context. Possible answers: For: • Passive audience models, such as the hypodermic needle theory, suggest that the audience believe what they see/hear and thus voting patterns and results will be affected by media coverage. • Media role models may affect how the audience vote and are often used by political parties in advertising campaigns (celebrity endorsement). • Spin doctors can control the representation of politicians in the media and thus affect how the audience vote. • Privately owned media can and do take strong political positions, e.g. in the stories selected, the language used and the opinions expressed – issues of bias. • At election time, political parties make extensive use of the media in order to transmit their messages to the voters – political broadcasts, manifestos, posters etc. • Media reporting of the opinion polls can also influence voting patterns, as they claim to be able to show what the election result is likely to be. • Discussion and debates in the media between political parties and politicians are commonplace, and are an effective way of getting policies across and criticising the opposition; • Use of social media by the political parties allows politicians to interact with the voters and potentially affect voting patterns, e.g. Twitter. • Propaganda and highly censored media in some countries is likely to affect voting patterns. • Other reasonable response. 4(e) Against: • Active audience models, such as the uses and gratifications theory, suggest that the media has little direct effect upon the audience and that the audience can control what media they consume and how it affects them. • Voters today are aware that political parties use the media in an attempt to win votes and thus are unlikely to believe everything they see and hear (Hall – negotiated reading etc.) • The audience will actively choose to switch off/not listen to anything in the media that they disagree with thus their voting patterns will not be affected by the media. • Political socialisation through the family/peer group is likely to be more influential in determining voting patterns than the media. • Social characteristics of the audience, i.e. gender/age/social class/ethnicity are more likely to determine voting patterns than the media. • The audience themselves may influence voting patterns today more than the media can, through their ability to use new media technologies, in order to post comments, create blogs, engage in discussion forums etc. • A large number of people choose not to vote and thus the media will not affect their voting patterns. • Other reasonable response. Band 0 No creditworthy response. Band 1 (1–4) Answers in this band may be vague and largely based on common sense, showing limited knowledge of whether the media affects voting patterns. Use of sociological terms or concepts is very unlikely. Responses may be short, undeveloped and one-sided, e.g. ‘the audience believes what they see/hear in the media’. Lower in the band (1–2 marks), expect one or two weak points. Higher in the band (3–4 marks), candidates may offer more than two points or provide a weak definition of key terms, i.e. voting patterns / how voters choose to vote, in the question. Band 2 (5–8) In this band candidates will show some basic knowledge of whether the media affects voting patterns. Alternatively, they may offer an answer which is list-like in nature, but there will be no real attempt to assess the issues raised by the question. There may be limited use of sociological terms or concepts. Responses may be underdeveloped and lack range. Candidates may give examples of types of media, political parties and leaders, and election results. Answers may be simplistic and two-sided responses are unlikely. Lower in the band, the response will be rather narrow in the points covered and there will be little development. Higher in the band, more points will be covered and there will be limited development of some points. Alternatively, a list-like answer with little development covering both sides of the argument may score up to 8 marks. 4(e) A one-sided answer cannot score higher than 8 marks. Band 3 (9–12) Answers in this band will show good sociological knowledge and understanding of whether the media affects voting patterns. Sociological terms and concepts will be used with greater accuracy and/or frequency. For the most part, answers will be well developed, focused on the question and there will be a range of points presented. Candidates may discuss the hypodermic needle approach, the influence of spin doctors, issues of bias in the media and the reporting of the opinion polls. On the other side of the debate the uses and gratifications theory may be referred to alongside increased audience awareness of and cynicism towards party political broadcasts and advertising. There will be a two-sided response, but this may be unbalanced. At the bottom of the band, candidates may provide a narrower range of well-developed points. At the top of the band, expect a wider range of points and clear focus on the question. Band 4 (13–15) Answers in this band will show excellent knowledge and understanding of whether the media affects voting patterns. There will be a strong grasp of the argument as well as accurate and frequent use of sociological terms and concepts. Answers will be well developed, clearly focused on the question and discuss a wide range of points. Candidates may refer to the increased use of new media and audience interactivity, political socialisation and the wide range of political opinions and viewpoints available in a global media context. Responses will be two-sided and balanced. At the bottom of the band (13 marks), the answer may lack a specific conclusion. Higher in the band, there will be a clear attempt to offer an assessment of the ‘To what extent«?’ part of the question through a focused conclusion. Candidates should show consideration of points for and against the idea of whether the media affects voting patterns, citing some of the examples given.
2 Formal education in the world today takes many forms. For some sociologists it allows people to better their life chances whereas for others it simply reinforces social divisions and maintains social inequalities. (a) What is meant by the term ‘formal education’? [2] (b) Describe two examples of the culture of masculinity that may explain the educational underachievement of boys. [4] (c) Explain how schools can be ethnocentric. [6] (d) Explain why some students join anti-school sub-cultures. [8] (e) To what extent does the education system help the ruling class maintain their power in society? [15] Section C: Crime, deviance and social control
35 marks
Mark scheme: 2(a) What is meant by the term ‘formal education’? 2 Formal education takes place in classrooms where there is a set syllabus and set content to be taught and learnt. One mark for partial definition, e.g. what you’re taught in schools. Two marks for clear definition, e.g. learning that is pre-determined and assessed formally through an examination system. 2(b) Describe two examples of the culture of masculinity that may explain the 4 educational under-achievement of boys. Candidates will describe two different aspects of the culture of masculinity – norms and values that involve supposedly masculine characteristics, e.g. toughness. Possible answers: • Focus on sport rather than academic study and learning; • Not enjoying school and so developing anti-school values; • Truanting lessons to play with friends; • Being rude and aggressive towards teachers; • Avoiding work, not revising for tests and so falling into the lower sets and streams; • Picking on and making fun of those students who do choose to work hard; • Being involved in delinquency and crime outside school; • Forming an anti-school sub-culture in order to gain status with their peers; • Proving masculinity through deviant acts; • Peer group as hugely important – gaining approval from peers is more important than the value of education, e.g. peer pressure; • Other reasonable response. One mark for each point correctly identified (up to maximum of two). One mark for each point that is developed (up to a maximum of two). 2(c) Explain how schools can be ethnocentric. 6 Candidates should show an understanding of different ways that schools can be ethnocentric – seeing other cultures from the point of view of your own - so that the other culture is devalued. Possible answers: • Discrimination in schools – allocating ethnic minority pupils to lower sets and streams; • Teacher stereotyping/labelling – they may assume students from some ethnic minorities are unable to do well academically; • The curriculum may be biased towards the majority culture e.g. through the content of literature, history, national identity etc. – this tells the pupils from the minority groups that their culture is of less value; • School authorities may not deal with racism by other pupils against the minority, treating it as unimportant or over exaggerated; • Lack of ethnic minority teachers as role models; • Institutional racism – schools can be ethnocentric through curriculum structures and teachings, e.g. content of history syllabus; • Other reasonable response. Band 0 (0) No creditworthy response. Band 1 (1–3) Answers in this band will show only a limited awareness of how schools can be ethnocentric. Responses may be short and un-/underdeveloped. Answers may be descriptive. At the bottom of the band (1 mark), expect one weak point. Higher in the band (2–3 marks), candidates may offer more than one weak point, but there may be a tendency towards simplistic answers, engaging with sociological ideas without using sociological language, e.g. ‘Schools teach towards the ethnic majority and teachers favour them.’ Band 2 (4–6) A clear and accurate explanation showing good sociological knowledge and understanding of how schools can be ethnocentric. Sociological terms and concepts should be expected. Candidates may discuss e.g. ‘the learning of history and literature, lack of role models, teacher labelling etc.’ At the bottom of the band, the range of points covered may be narrow or lack detail. Higher in the band, answers will cover more than one factor in a well-developed way or cover several factors in less detail. 2(d) Explain why some students join anti-school sub-cultures. 8 Candidates should show understanding of the various reasons why some students join anti-school sub-cultures. Expect an accurate identification of the types of students this is most likely to apply to, e.g. working class, male and ethnic minority. Candidates may talk about trends to do with ethnicity, gender and social class or may approach the question in more general terms. Possible reasons: • Working class students typically do not do as well in education as those in the higher classes – anti-school sub-culture is a way of fighting back against capitalist oppression, e.g. Marxism; • Boys are less likely than girls to conform at school and to value education. They therefore may use anti-school sub-cultures as a way to have fun with their friends; • Ethnic minorities may feel excluded from the school system as it does not reflect their culture or heritage – ethnocentrism; • Peer pressure in schools is often a key reason for the educational performance of students and may lead to anti-school sub-cultures forming in order to conform; • Setting and streaming are often very influential in terms of the achievements of students, categorising some as ‘winners’ and some as ‘losers’: those in the lower sets are more likely to form anti-school sub- cultures as they don’t see the point in education; • Teacher labelling may lead to a self-fulfilling prophecy for students, e.g. racism/sexism and may cause anti-school sub-cultures to form; • Anti-school sub-cultures may be a means for students to gain status in schools; • The curriculum – this is thought by many to be middle class and white biased (ethnocentric curriculum) and thus may account for differential performance of students and the formation of anti-school sub-cultures; • Other reasonable response. Band 0 (0) No creditworthy response. Band 1 (1–3) Answers in this band will show only a limited awareness of why some students join anti-school sub-cultures. Responses may be short and undeveloped, e.g. ‘some pupils don’t like school’ without justification. Sociological terms and concepts are unlikely to be used. At the bottom of the band (1 mark), expect one weak point. Higher in the band (2–3 marks), candidates may offer more than one weak point. Band 2 (4–6) Answers in this band will show basic sociological knowledge and understanding of why some students join anti-school sub-cultures. Responses may be underdeveloped and lacking in range. Answers may concentrate on only a few factors, such as ‘lack of status’ or ‘teacher labelling and stereotypes’ and so be a little narrow. At the bottom of the band, candidates are unlikely to use sociological terms and concepts accurately. Higher in the band, candidates may be beginning to use sociological terms and concepts with greater accuracy. However, some aspects of the answer may only be partially developed. 2(d) Band 3 (7–8) Answers in this band will show good sociological knowledge and understanding of why some students join anti-school sub-cultures and will be well developed and explained, e.g. ‘Clear trends in the types of students that join anti-school sub-cultures relating to ethnicity, gender and social class are clear to see, which suggests school factors have an important role to play in this. Some students feel undervalued in school and so look to the sub-culture to provide them with status. Others use it as a way of making school more fun. For others, they do not believe they can achieve in education because of teacher negative labels and low sets and thus the sub-culture becomes a safe haven for them’. Sociological terms and concepts will be used accurately, overall. Answers will be well focused on the question and there will be a range of reasons presented. At the top of the band explanations will be clear throughout. 2(e) To what extent does the education system help the ruling class maintain 15 their power in society? Candidates should show an awareness of the various ways the education system helps the ruling class maintain their power in society. It is likely that students will engage with the functionalist/Marxist (consensus/conflict) debate, although they need not use these terms explicitly within their answers. Possible answers: For • Marxists believe that education instils the ideology of the ruling class into students and thus this becomes the norm (false class consciousness); • Working class children are taught a set of values that will ensure they become good workers for the capitalist system, conforming not rebelling; • The hidden curriculum ensures children learn to do as they are told, accept boredom and conform to authority – ensuring they are ready for work in the capitalist system; • The children of the ruling class typically attend different schools to the lower classes, they are privately educated which makes it easier to gain places at the top universities and then the best paying, elite jobs; • Old boy networks and networks of privilege can be passed down through the social closure operated by many elite schools and businesses (Bourdieu social capital); • Private education allows wealthy parents to buy their children success and privilege (Bourdieu economic and cultural capital); • Setting and streaming often reflects class differences; • Teacher labelling – working class students may be thought of and treated differently to middle/upper class children, thus affecting future positions in society – this may lead to a self-fulfilling prophecy; • Working class students may be more likely to follow a vocational programme of study, whereas the higher classes have a more academic path; • Other reasonable response. 2(e) Against • Feminists believe that education inculcates patriarchal values rather than capitalist ones; • Functionalists believe that education performs vital functions for individuals and society, such as socialisation and social control; it does not indoctrinate pupils; • Education is meritocratic, based on principles of equality that ensure that all students have the same chances to succeed, e.g. through the comprehensive system; • Education allows for social mobility and therefore people from all social groups, regardless of background, can be successful in life; • Positive discrimination, compensatory education and scholarship systems all exist in order to support pupils from less privileged backgrounds to do well in education; • Different types of education exist for different people, allowing all to be successful, e.g. academic and vocational; • Students may reject negative teacher labels through a self-negating prophecy and thus the education system will not help the ruling class to maintain power; • In contemporary modern industrial societies it is achieved status that is more important than ascribed status in terms of achieving power, therefore the education system itself does not help the ruling class to maintain their power; • Other reasonable response. Band 0 (0) No creditworthy response. Band 1 (1–4) Answers in this band may be vague and largely based on common sense, showing limited knowledge of whether the education system helps the ruling class to maintain their power in society. Use of sociological terms or concepts is very unlikely. Responses may be short, undeveloped and one-sided, e.g. ‘some schools get better examination results than others’. Lower in the band (1–2 marks), expect one or two weak points. Higher in the band (3–4 marks) candidates may offer more than two points or provide a weak definition of key terms, e.g. ‘the ruling class are those people in society with the most power and influence’, in the question. Band 2 (5–8) In this band candidates will show some basic knowledge of whether the education system helps the ruling class to maintain their power in society. Alternatively, they may offer an answer which is list-like in nature but there will be no real attempt to assess the issues raised by the question. There may be limited use of sociological terms or concepts. Responses may be underdeveloped and lack range. Answers may be simplistic and two-sided responses are unlikely. Lower in the band, the response will be rather narrow in the points covered and there will be little development. Higher in the band, more points will be covered and there will be limited development of some points, e.g. ‘wealthy parents can buy their children an education and send them to private schools where they are more likely to get good examination results and be successful in life’. Alternatively, a list-like answer with little development covering both sides of the argument may score up to 8 marks. 2(e) A one-sided answer cannot score higher than 8 marks. Band 3 (9–12) Answers in this band will show good sociological knowledge and understanding of whether the education system helps the ruling class to maintain their power in society. Sociological terms and concepts will be used with greater accuracy and/or frequency. For the most part, answers will be well developed, focused on the question and there will be a range of points presented. There will be a two- sided response but this may be unbalanced. At the bottom of the band, candidates may provide a narrower range of well-developed points. At the top of the band, expect a wider range of points and clear focus on the question. Candidates may outline that e.g. ‘there are different opinions within sociology as to whether the education system helps the ruling class to maintain their power in society. Marxists see education as a means for the elite to keep their powerful positions in society through the teaching of capitalist values and the hidden curriculum, whereas functionalists believe education is available equally to all and is meritocratic’. Band 4 (13–15) Answers in this band will show excellent knowledge and understanding of whether the education system helps the ruling class to maintain their power in society. There will be a strong grasp of the argument, as well as accurate and frequent use of sociological terms and concepts. Answers will be well developed, clearly focused on the question and discuss a wide range of points. Candidates may outline and discuss different points, e.g. ‘hidden curriculum, indoctrination, selective education, hierarchy’ etc. Responses will be two-sided and balanced. At the bottom of the band (13 marks), the answer may lack a specific conclusion. Higher in the band, there will be a clear attempt to offer an assessment of the ‘To what extent«?’ part of the question through a focused conclusion. Candidates should show consideration of points for and against the idea of whether the education system helps the ruling class to maintain their power in society, citing some of the examples given. Section C: Crime, deviance and social control
3 For some people being a criminal is their master status. This is often associated with young people in sub-cultures. One reason for criminal behaviour is inadequate socialisation at home, although not all sociologists would agree with this explanation. (a) What is meant by the term ‘master status’? [2] (b) Describe two examples of white-collar crimes. [4] (c) Explain how sub-cultures can be linked to crime and deviance. [6] (d) Explain why inadequate socialisation may cause some people to commit crime. [8] (e) To what extent are policing strategies effective at controlling crime? [15] Section D: Media
35 marks
Mark scheme: 3(a) What is meant by the term ‘master status’? 2 A status that overrides all others and becomes the way an individual sees themselves and are seen by others (labelling). One mark for partial definition, e.g. main way you/others think of yourself. Two marks for clear definition, e.g. the social position most people and/or yourself associate you with, e.g. a criminal. 3(b) Describe two examples of white-collar crimes. 4 Candidates will describe two examples of white-collar crimes. A white-collar crime is a crime that middle class people are able to commit because of their occupational position/status. Examiners will need to credit a wide variety of examples here that reflect the diversity of candidates’ experiences. Specific examples may be referred to, e.g. Nick Leeson, but this is not necessary to score the marks. Possible answers: • Fraud and embezzlement; • Tax evasion; • Bribery and corruption in Government and business; • Employees fiddling their expenses; • Professional misconduct; • Insider trading; • Other reasonable response. One mark for each point correctly identified (up to a maximum of two). One mark for each point that is developed (up to a maximum of two). 3(c) Explain how sub-cultures can be linked to crime and deviance. 6 Candidates need to demonstrate an understanding of the ways in which sub- cultures can be linked to crime and deviance. They may discuss specific sub- cultures such as Punks/Skins etc. or criminal sub-cultures such as gangs. Either way is fine to credit. Possible answers: • Cohen – in response to status frustration a group may form new norms and values that are different to wider society, e.g. criminal; • Cloward and Ohlin – illegitimate opportunity structure: criminal sub- cultures with successful criminal role models for people to look up to; • Miller – links between the distinct sub-culture of the working class and crime, e.g. focal concerns of being aggressive, resisting authority, excitement etc.; • Marxism and youth sub-cultures, i.e. criminal behaviour of the Skinheads, angry and frustrated at the capitalist society that left them poor and unemployed; • Juvenile gangs – knife and gun crime; marginalised young people use the gang to give them an identity and a status; • Young people in sub-cultures may drift into criminal behaviour – Matza; as a phase or a stage in their life; • Sub-cultures are based around people with similarly distinct norms and values and it is important for members to fit in; this may be a reason for crime and deviance; • Members of sub-cultures may often commit acts of crime and deviance; • Peer pressure can often be found in a sub-culture – the threat of negative sanctions may push some towards crime; • Other reasonable response. Band 0 (0) No creditworthy response. Band 1 (1–3) Answers in this band will show only a limited awareness of how sub-cultures can be linked to crime and deviance. Responses may be short and un- /underdeveloped. Candidates may be confused as to what is meant by sub- cultures. At the bottom of the band (1 mark), expect one weak point. Higher in the band (2–3 marks), candidates may offer more than one weak point, but there may be a tendency towards simplistic answers, engaging with sociological ideas without using sociological language, e.g. ‘having different ways of thinking to most people in society might lead to crime’. Band 2 (4–6) A clear and accurate explanation showing good sociological knowledge and understanding of how sub-cultures can be linked to crime and deviance. Sociological terms and concepts should be expected. Candidates may refer to skinheads, gangs, criminal subcultures, lack of status, marginalisation, unemployment etc. with examples. At the bottom of the band, the range of points covered may be narrow or lack detail. Higher in the band, answers will cover more than one factor in a well-developed way or cover several factors in less detail. 3(d) Explain why inadequate socialisation may cause some people to commit 8 crime. Candidates need to identify what is meant by the term ‘inadequate socialisation’ and explain why this may lead some people to crime. Possible answers: • Without the core norms and values of society being taught, some people may not know how they are expected to behave in order to conform and thus turn to crime instead; • The New Right talk about fatherless families failing to socialise their children properly, leaving them without structure and discipline; • Criminal families/environments – if this is the environment they have been brought up in then they are likely to commit crime – criminal role models; • Feral/neglected children miss out on crucial stages and processes of socialisation and thus have not been effectively taught society’s norms and values; • When informal methods of social control are either not present or start to break down, then criminal behaviour becomes more likely to occur; • Culture of masculinity – young males are socialised through several agencies into the need to prove their masculinity; criminal behaviour is one way to do so; • Peer group pressure – young people may be pressured into criminal behaviour and activities by their peer group who become the most dominant agent of socialisation; • Criminal socialisation – young people in certain localities and environments may grow up learning criminal norms and values, i.e. the illegitimate opportunity structure; • Other reasonable response. Band 0 (0) No creditworthy response. Band 1 (1–3) Answers in this band will show only a limited awareness of why inadequate socialisation may cause some people to commit crime. Candidates may not fully understand what is meant by ‘inadequate socialisation’. Responses may be short and undeveloped, e.g. ‘not being taught how to behave properly’. Sociological terms and concepts are unlikely to be used. At the bottom of the band (1 mark), expect one weak point. Higher in the band (2–3 marks), candidates may offer more than one weak point. Band 2 (4–6) Answers in this band will show basic sociological knowledge and understanding of why inadequate socialisation may cause some people to commit crime. Candidates may say that e.g. ‘in some environments dominant values are not strong and instead are replaced by a set of criminal values that become the norm’. Responses may be underdeveloped and lacking in range. At the bottom of the band, candidates are unlikely to use sociological terms and concepts accurately. Higher in the band, candidates may be beginning to use sociological terms and concepts with greater accuracy. However, some aspects of the answer may only be partially developed. 3(d) Band 3 (7–8) Answers in this band will show good sociological knowledge and understanding of why inadequate socialisation may cause some people to commit crime and will be well developed and explained. Candidates may discuss single parent families, alternative sets of norms and values, master status, criminal socialisation, role models, illegitimate opportunity structure etc. Sociological terms and concepts will be used accurately, overall. Answers will be well focused on the question and there will be a range of reasons presented. At the top of the band explanations will be clear throughout. 3(e) To what extent are policing strategies effective at controlling crime? 15 Candidates need to show an understanding of different policing strategies and consider whether they are effective at controlling crime. Candidates may focus on policing strategies generally or may refer to specific/local examples. Possible answers: For • Police targeting allows the police to focus on those in society most likely to commit crime; • The police can be used to control protests and demonstrations; • As the police can use force and carry weapons they are a visible deterrent to criminals; • As crime and criminals now cross national borders, e.g. cyber-crime, police forces can cooperate and work together to help solve crimes; • Police surveillance is an effective way of monitoring and controlling crime; • Police can be active members of the community and talk about the consequences and effects of crime in a bid to reduce it, e.g. in school/community centres etc.; • Zero tolerance policies of policing can reduce the crime rate, e.g. New York City; • Military style policing is believed by many to effectively control crime, e.g. suppression of riots and unrest; • Police can undertake specialist training to tackle particular crimes, e.g. sexual offences/abuse; • Other reasonable response. 3(e) Against • Policing strategies cannot be that effective or we would not see high crime rates and high levels of anti-social behaviour; • Police activities, such as stop and search rates and targeting, are based on stereotypical assumptions and result in certain social groups being more likely to be arrested than others; this does not control more hidden crime; • The police have been accused of institutional racism; this does not successfully control crime; • The police may still operate with a chivalry thesis, meaning males are much more likely to be arrested than females; • Much police practice is determined by particular Government targets and the need to improve clear up rates, therefore sometimes it is the crimes that are easy to solve that are focused on, with others not being recorded/dealt with; • Marxists believe that the police are another tool of the ruling class, used to oppress the poor and protect the hidden middle class criminals further; • Many sociologists believe that military style policing simply serves to alienate the police from society and effectively reduce the likelihood of crimes being reported; • Interactionists believe that police strategies may sometimes cause deviancy amplification, therefore not successfully controlling crime; • The high dark figure of crime indicates that police strategies are not effective at controlling crime; • Candidates may discuss the importance of other agents of social control in effectively controlling crime rather than it being about policing strategies; • Other reasonable response. Band 0 (0) No creditworthy response. Band 1 (1–4) Answers in this band may be vague and largely based on common sense showing limited knowledge of whether policing strategies are effective at controlling crime. Use of sociological terms or concepts is very unlikely. Responses may be short, undeveloped and one-sided, e.g. the police get the bad people off the streets. Lower in the band (1–2 marks), expect one or two weak points. Higher in the band (3–4 marks) candidates may offer more than two points or provide a weak definition of key terms, e.g. policing strategies are methods used by the police to combat crime, in the question. 3(e) Band 2 (5–8) In this band candidates will show some basic knowledge of whether policing strategies are effective at controlling crime. Alternatively, they may offer an answer which is list-like in nature but there will be no real attempt to assess the issues raised by the question. There may be limited use of sociological terms or concepts. Candidates may discuss some reasons why policing strategies may control crime, i.e. protects the public, targets criminals, riot control etc. but responses may be underdeveloped and lack range. Answers may be simplistic and two-sided responses are unlikely. Lower in the band, the response will be rather narrow in the points covered and there will be little development. Higher in the band, more points will be covered and there will be limited development of some points. Alternatively, a list-like answer with little development covering both sides of the argument may score up to 8 marks. A one-sided answer cannot score higher than 8 marks. Band 3 (9–12) Answers in this band will show good sociological knowledge and understanding of whether policing strategies are effective at controlling crime. Sociological terms and concepts will be used with greater accuracy and/or frequency. For the most part, answers will be well developed, focused on the question and there will be a range of points presented. Candidates may be able to present a range of points to support the idea that policing strategies do control crime, but also be aware of some of the arguments against this, i.e. stereotyping, institutional racism, chivalry thesis etc. There will be a two-sided response but this may be unbalanced. At the bottom of the band, candidates may provide a narrower range of well-developed points. At the top of the band, expect a wider range of points and clear focus on the question. Band 4 (13–15) Answers in this band will show excellent knowledge and understanding of whether policing strategies are effective at controlling crime. There will be a strong grasp of the argument, as well as accurate and frequent use of sociological terms and concepts. Answers will be well developed, clearly focused on the question and discuss a wide range of points. For example, candidates may say that policing strategies are clearly effective at controlling crime, as police can use sophisticated surveillance techniques to monitor and control deviant behaviour. Zero tolerance policies, for example, were proven to be particularly effective at reducing the crime rate. However, most people are aware that the police target particular social groups more than others and thus, for many Marxist sociologists, are simply a tool of the ruling class used to hide middle class crime and criminalise the working class etc. Responses will be two- sided and balanced. At the bottom of the band (13 marks), the answer may lack a specific conclusion. Higher in the band, there will be a clear attempt to offer an assessment of the ‘To what extent«?’ part of the question through a focused conclusion. Candidates should show consideration of points for and against the idea of whether the media influence ideas about crime, citing some of the examples given. Section D: Media
4 Today’s media are increasingly difficult to control. Media representations of ethnic minorities are often stereotypical and propaganda is still seen on a global scale. This may lead to a greater possibility of the media affecting how the audience think and behave. (a) What is meant by the term ‘propaganda’? [2] (b) Describe two stereotypes of ethnic minorities seen in the media. [4] (c) Explain how globalisation is changing media content. [6] (d) Explain why governments try to control the content of the media. [8] (e) To what extent do the media shape the audience’s attitudes and behaviour? [15]
35 marks
Mark scheme: 4(a) What is meant by the term ‘propaganda’? 2 Use of the media to influence people to accept a particular point of view. One mark for partial definition. e.g. bias in the media. Two marks for clear definition, e.g. a one sided version of events e.g. Nazi Germany. 4(b) Describe two stereotypes of ethnic minorities seen in the media. 4 Candidates will describe two stereotypes of ethnic minorities seen in the media. Candidates may refer to ethnic minority representations holistically or give examples of stereotypes specific to particular ethnic minority groups. Possible answers: • Under-representation/invisibility – ethnic minorities are rarely seen in lead roles and parts in the media and are very under-represented; • Negatively stereotyped as different/dangerous etc.; • Black people represented as being criminal or deviant or involved with gangs; • Black people as sports players rather than academics; • Links with religious extremism and terrorism; • Asians with large extended families, owning corner shops etc.; • Tokenism – when an ethnic minority appears in the media, this may be an attempt by the media organisation to create the impression of equality; • Binary oppositions between ethnic majority and ethnic minority groups; • As illegal immigrants; • Those from developing countries as living in poverty and in need of charity; • The dangerous savage, e.g. the Indians in cowboy films; • Black people shown as entertainers – music, dance, comedy; • Non-white women represented as sexually exotic – dangerous and alluring and outspoken; • The rich, evil tyrant – e.g. Idi Amin in ‘The Last King of Scotland’; • Other reasonable response. One mark for each point correctly identified (up to a maximum of two). One mark for each point developed (up to a maximum of two). 4(c) Explain how globalisation is changing media content. 6 Candidates need to demonstrate an understanding of the way globalisation is changing media content. Candidates may talk generally about globalisation or more specifically about particular examples from the media. Possible answers: • Globalisation leads to instant media content being available, unfolding international news content can be seen as it happens; • Citizen journalism means that the global audience can create media content; • The new media allows for a sense of a common culture and belonging, not to a national identity, but to a global village e.g. the growth of a global culture shown in media content; • New norms and values can be seen and shared through the global media leading to changing social attitudes and social change; • Advertising can be communicated on a global level and products are increasingly made to appeal to a global audience; • Local cultures may be lost by Western culture dominating the media; • A wider range of global products are available to, and can be consumed, by the audience i.e. Nollywood, Bollywood, Bhangra music etc.; • Other reasonable response. Band 0 (0) No creditworthy response. Band 1 (1–3) Answers in this band will show only a limited awareness of how globalisation is changing media content. Responses may be short and un-/underdeveloped. At the bottom of the band (1 mark), expect one weak point. Higher in the band (2–3 marks) candidates may offer more than one weak point, but there may be a tendency towards simplistic answers, engaging with sociological ideas without using sociological language, e.g. ‘showing things from other countries.’ Band 2 (4–6) A clear and accurate explanation showing good sociological knowledge and understanding of how globalisation is changing media content. For example, discussing the diversity of media content today, changing norms and values and alternative ideologies. Sociological language and concepts should be expected. At the bottom of the band, the range of points covered may be narrow or lack detail. Higher in the band, answers will cover more than one factor in a well- developed way or cover several factors in less detail. 4(d) Explain why Governments try to control the content of the media. 8 Candidates should show an awareness of why Governments try to control the content of the media. This may be a generic discussion or may focus on specific Governments and their controls over media content. Possible answers: • To create a sense of national unity; • State-owned media can be used for propaganda so the audience will accept the world view being presented and not allowing access to alternative views; • In order to present the Government and its policies in a positive light and maintain power; • To control broadcast content, e.g. to have the power not to show stories or issues that would portray the Government in a negative light - censorship; • Alternative views or values tend to be marginalised and/or ridiculed in the media through the images seen and the language used which prevents resistance to the Government; • The Government can use the media to demonise and scapegoat certain social groups in order to justify oppressive policies or actions; • To protect the audience from unsuitable content, e.g. pornography, drug taking etc.; • To protect state secrets and publics security, e.g. through legislation such as The Official Secrets Act; • The media and therefore the Government can control the audience’s feelings and thoughts through selective representations and censorship; • Other reasonable response. Band 0 (0) No creditworthy response. Band 1 (1–3) Answers in this band will show only a limited awareness of why Governments try to control the content of the media. Candidates may not really understand what is meant by Government and control. Responses may be short and undeveloped, e.g. ‘to influence how the media think’, without justification/explanation. Sociological terms and concepts are unlikely to be used. At the bottom of the band (1 mark), expect one weak point. Higher in the band (2–3 marks), candidates may offer more than one weak point. Band 2 (4–6) Answers in this band will show basic sociological knowledge and understanding of why Governments try to control the content of the media. Responses may be underdeveloped and lacking in range. Candidates may explain some of the reasons, e.g. dominant ideology being maintained, to protect the public from undesirable content etc. At the bottom of the band, candidates are unlikely to use sociological terms and concepts accurately. Higher in the band, candidates may be beginning to use sociological terms and concepts with greater accuracy. However, some aspects of the answer may only be partially developed. 4(d) Band 3 (7–8) Answers in this band will show good sociological knowledge and understanding of why Governments try to control the content of the media and will be well developed and explained. Sociological terms and concepts will be used accurately, overall. Answers will be well focused on the question and there will be a range of reasons presented, e.g. censorship, diverting attention away from the serious issues in society, propaganda etc. At the top of the band explanations will be clear throughout. 4(e) To what extent do the media shape the audience’s attitudes and 15 behaviour? Candidates will need to look at the ways in which the media can shape the attitudes and behaviour of the audience. A wide range of different media may be considered. The argument that the media does not influence the audience’s attitudes and behaviour could also be discussed in evaluation. Examples may be used to strengthen the points made. Possible answers: For • Advertising is all around us and is used to try and persuade people to spend their money and consume material goods leading to the creation of a consumer culture and an acceptance of capitalism; • Prevalence of new and social media means, for postmodernists, that the media is all around us, and with things ‘going viral’, this will affect attitudes and behaviour; • Imitation – the audience may copy what they see in the media, e.g. Grand Theft Auto video game copy catting incident in Japan, school shootings in America etc.; • The media can be used to set the agenda and thus tell the public what is important in society, influencing attitudes and behaviour; • News values in the media determine media content and this can determine how the audience think and behave • Biased media reporting, propaganda and censorship controls content of the media and thus affects the thoughts and actions of the audience; • Marxists believe that the media conveys the dominant ideology to the masses and ensures that ruling class power is maintained; • Feminists believe that the media conveys a patriarchal ideology to the audience and thus supports gendered inequalities in society; • Seeing and hearing the same messages and images on a regular basis in the media makes the audience more likely to be affected by and accept them - cultural effects model; • The use of role models in the media are a big influence on the audience and so can shape attitudes and behaviour, e.g. attitudes to drugs, fashion sense, language used etc.; • Media can often be used to shape gender identity, perhaps also used as part of primary socialisation; • The hypodermic syringe theory and other passive audience models argue that the audience are directly affected by what they see and the media; • Moral panics and the creation of folk devils in the media can shape the audience’s attitudes and behaviour towards crime and deviance; • Other reasonable response. 4(e) Against • The audience do not have to accept and believe the media version of events – negotiated and oppositional readings frequently occur (Hall); • Active audience models, such as the uses and gratifications theory, argue that it is the public who decide the effects the media have upon them: it is about choice; • The two-step flow model indicates that it is opinion leaders, rather than the media, that influences the audience’s attitudes and opinions; • In the postmodern world media outlets are everywhere and there is a diverse range of material and viewpoints for the audience to choose from, therefore the range of beliefs available to the audience are vast and diverse; • The new media allow the audience to be actively involved in media content through interactivity, therefore the role of the media in shaping attitudes and behaviour can be questioned – user-generated content etc.; • Agencies of socialisation, such as the family and the peer group, may be more influential in shaping attitudes and behaviour than the media; • If the media were solely responsible for creating attitudes and determining how people behave then there would be high levels of consensus across the globe – this is not the case, with a wide range of alternative ideologies being in existence; • Other reasonable response. Band 0 (0) No creditworthy response. Band 1 (1–4) Answers in this band may be vague and largely based on common sense showing limited knowledge of whether the media shape the audience’s attitudes and behaviour. Use of sociological terms or concepts is very unlikely. Responses may be short, undeveloped and one-sided, e.g. the audience buy what they see in adverts. Lower in the band (1–2 marks), expect one or two weak points. Higher in the band (3–4 marks) candidates may offer more than two points or provide a weak definition of key terms, i.e. attitudes are how we think and behaviour is how we act, in the question. Band 2 (5–8) In this band candidates will show some basic knowledge of whether the media shape the audience’s attitudes and behaviour. Alternatively, they may offer an answer which is list-like in nature but there will be no real attempt to assess the issues raised by the question. There may be limited use of sociological terms or concepts. Responses may be underdeveloped and lack range. Candidates may give examples of TV shows, newspapers and films and how these may affect the audience, e.g. children copying the violence they see in computer games. Answers may be simplistic and two-sided responses are unlikely. Lower in the band, the response will be rather narrow in the points covered and there will be little development. Higher in the band, more points will be covered and there will be limited development of some points. Alternatively, a list-like answer with little development covering both sides of the argument may score up to 8 marks. 4(e) A one-sided answer cannot score higher than 8 marks. Band 3 (9–12) Answers in this band will show good sociological knowledge and understanding of whether the media shape the audience’s attitudes and behaviour. Sociological terms and concepts will be used with greater accuracy and/or frequency. For the most part, answers will be well developed, focused on the question and there will be a range of points presented. Candidates may discuss media effects theories, such as the hypodermic needle and the uses and gratifications model. They may also give specific examples, such as voting patterns, body image and advertising. Concepts such as imitation and role modelling may be referred to. There will be a two-sided response, but this may be unbalanced. At the bottom of the band, candidates may provide a narrower range of well-developed points. At the top of the band, expect a wider range of points and clear focus on the question. Band 4 (13–15) Answers in this band will show excellent knowledge and understanding of whether the media shape the audience’s attitudes and behaviour. There will be a strong grasp of the argument, as well as accurate and frequent use of sociological terms and concepts. Answers will be well developed, clearly focused on the question and discuss a wide range of points. Candidates may refer to the idea that the audience are all individuals and thus be aware that it is impossible to generalise the effects of the media on attitudes and behaviour. Responses will be two-sided and balanced. At the bottom of the band (13 marks), the answer may lack a specific conclusion. Higher in the band, there will be a clear attempt to offer an assessment of the ‘To what extent«?’ part of the question through a focused conclusion. Candidates should show consideration of points for and against the idea of whether the media shape the audience’s attitudes and behaviour, citing some of the examples given.
2 There are several reasons why different social groups do better than others in education. Some believe this is due to the peer group, whereas others refer to school factors such as the self- fulfilling prophecy and the hidden curriculum. Whether the education system today offers students equality of opportunity remains a matter of debate. (a) What is meant by the term ‘self-fulfilling prophecy’? [2] (b) Describe two criticisms of IQ tests. [4] (c) Explain how the hidden curriculum controls pupils. [6] (d) Explain why some sociologists believe that selective education is unfair. [8] (e) To what extent is the peer group the most influential factor in determining educational achievement? [15] Section C: Crime, deviance and social control
35 marks
Mark scheme: 2(a) What is meant by the term ‘self-fulfilling prophecy’? 2 When people act in the way they have been expected to and so make that expectation come true. One mark for partial definition, e.g. do what others expect. Two marks for clear definition, e.g. acting up to the label given and making that label come true. 2(b) Describe two criticisms of IQ tests. 4 Candidates will describe two different criticisms of IQ tests. Possible answers: • If intelligence is linked to environmental factors, then a high score in the test may simply reflect a more stimulating environment in early childhood and not any innate ability. • IQ tests are based on a narrow range of reasoning skills and therefore exclude other types of intelligence – they don’t show the full picture. • IQ tests are written by people who inevitably build their own cultural norms and assumptions into the tests – this means those from other cultures are likely to find the test more difficult. • IQ tests reflect just one moment in time, but intelligence is developmental, so the scores should not be used to predict future achievement. • Timed conditions of IQ tests means there is no time for thought and reflection, which can cause some respondents to under-perform. • Performance in IQ tests can be affected by factors such as being nervous, feeling ill etc.; • Performance in IQ tests is found to improve with practice – many parents therefore get their children to repeat and practice the tests in order that they score high marks. • Some people who score low in the IQ tests go on to do well in their education and their career, whereas others who get high scores do not always succeed in later life. • Other reasonable response. One mark for each point correctly identified (up to maximum of two). One mark for each point that is developed (up to maximum of two). 2(c) Explain how the hidden curriculum controls pupils. 6 Candidates are likely to show an understanding of different types of sanctions used by schools, as well as discussing various aspects of the hidden curriculum. How these sanctions lead to student conformity (following the rules, doing what’s expected etc.) may also be discussed. Possible answers: • Informal sanctions such as glares, warnings and body language let children know whether their behaviour and actions are approved or disapproved of. • Pupils learn norms, values, beliefs and attitudes through their school experiences. • Classrooms are usually set out with the teacher at the front and the children seated – this sends out the message that the teacher has the power and is in control. • Rewards – children like to receive praise and therefore may do as they’re told by teachers in order to receive stickers, positive contact with home, merit rewards etc. • Schools are hierarchies and pupils soon learn their position in the hierarchy and conform accordingly. • Competitive sports and testing children sends out the message that doing better than others is more important than cooperating with them. • The importance of punctuality and being on time is soon learnt through schools. • Schools have rules that are enforced by teachers, sending out the message that you have to do what you are told by those in authority, whether you agree or not. • Marxists believe that the hidden curriculum maintains the ruling classes control of the lower classes through ideology (capitalism). • Marxists believe working class children are indoctrinated through education to learn a set of values that will make them good workers in the capitalist system, e.g. not questioning commands from a superior, learning the importance of punctuality. • Feminists see the hidden curriculum as conveying patriarchal values and norms, so teaching and reinforcing stereotypical and different expectations of each gender. • Other reasonable response. Band 0 No creditworthy response. Band 1 (1–3) Answers in this band will show only a limited awareness of how the hidden curriculum controls pupils. Responses may be short and un- /underdeveloped. Description is likely. At the bottom of the band (1 mark), expect one weak point. Higher in the band (2–3 marks), candidates may offer more than one weak point, but there may be a tendency towards simplistic answers, engaging with sociological ideas without using sociological language, e.g. ‘Students soon learn that when they don’t do what those in power want them to do, they get told off and punished.’ 2(c) Band 2 (4–6) A clear and accurate explanation showing good sociological knowledge and understanding of how the hidden curriculum controls pupils. Sociological terms and concepts should be expected. Candidates may discuss for example: ‘the learning of norms and values; authority, secondary socialisation; Marxism, patriarchy.’ At the bottom of the band, the range of points covered may be narrow or lack detail. Higher in the band, answers will cover more than one factor in a well-developed way, or cover several factors in less detail. 2(d) Explain why some sociologists believe that selective education is 8 unfair. Candidates should show understanding of the various reasons why some sociologists believe that selective education is unfair. Candidates may talk about different types of schools within their response. Candidates may talk about trends to do with ethnicity, gender, religion and social class, or may approach the question in more general terms. It is likely that private (paid for) schools and/or grammar schools (11+ exams) will be the focus of the candidate’s answer. Possible reasons: • Private schools have smaller class sizes and better facilities than state schools, which may advantage the students there in terms of educational achievement. • Teacher expectations – students are expected to work hard and do well in private schools and thus are pushed towards this. • Most parents cannot afford private schools – it is unfair that the rich can buy a better education. • Examination results in private schools are better than those in non- selective education. • The elite private schools spend about four times as much a year on each student as state schools do. • Private schools play an important role in ensuring that the higher classes can pass on their privileges to their children – maintaining the old boy network. • Research shows that even when children who go to private schools get worse examination results than those in state schools, they still go on to get better jobs. • Elite universities, e.g. Oxford and Cambridge, still recruit primarily from the private sector, and it is through attendance at such universities that individuals are able to access the elite jobs in society. • Selective education effectively means that wealthy parents can almost guarantee their children will have well paid future careers, which undermines any principles of equality; • Cultural and economic capital of the higher classes means they are more likely to pass selection tests for entry to private schools/elite universities. • Faith schools may not be aiding multiculturalism (segregation). • Single sex schools may be reinforcing patriarchy (feminism). • Other reasonable response. 2(d) Band 0 No creditworthy response. Band 1 (1–3) Answers in this band will show only a limited awareness of why some sociologists believe that selective education is unfair. Responses may be short and undeveloped, e.g. ‘buying an education’, without justification. Sociological terms and concepts are unlikely to be used. At the bottom of the band (1 mark), expect one weak point. Higher in the band (2–3 marks), candidates may offer more than one weak point. Band 2 (4–6) Answers in this band will show basic sociological knowledge and understanding of why some sociologists believe that selective education is unfair. Responses may be underdeveloped and lacking in range. Answers may concentrate on only a few factors such as, ‘selective education maintains the elite position of power’ or ‘private schools get the best examination results’ and so be a little narrow. At the bottom of the band, candidates are unlikely to use sociological terms and concepts accurately. Higher in the band, candidates may be beginning to use sociological terms and concepts with greater accuracy. However, some aspects of the answer may only be partially developed. Band 3 (7–8) Answers in this band will show good sociological knowledge and understanding of why some sociologists believe that selective education is unfair, and will be well-developed and explained, e.g. ‘Private schools are funded by parents, meaning that the schools have a lot of money and can afford to provide small class sizes for their students. This can lead to better educational performance as students have more one-to-one attention. Parents value educational success and have high levels of cultural capital, which favours these students over others. Students from private schools are more likely to attend elite universities and to then get the high flying and well-paid jobs in society’. Sociological terms and concepts will be used accurately, overall. Answers will be well focused on the question and there will be a range of reasons presented. At the top of the band, explanations will be clear throughout. 2(e) To what extent is the peer group the most influential factor in 15 determining educational achievement? Candidates should show an awareness of the various influences on educational achievement such as the peer group, home factors and school factors. Possible answers: For • Some students develop an anti-school subculture which provides students with a means to improve their own self esteem by giving them status within their peer group. • A culture of masculinity may form in counter-school cultures which causes these peers to disrupt the smooth running and learning of the school. • Peer pressure – young people want to fit in and thus the pressure from their peers (either positive or negative) may well determine how well they achieve at school, i.e. attitudes to homework, discipline, attendance. • Imitation – some children may copy their peers in order to conform and this can be either negative or positive: this is likely to affect educational achievement. • Sometimes pupils from ethnic minority groups are labelled as failures and placed in low sets and streams. These peer groups may then develop a shared set of values and develop a self- fulfilling prophecy. • Girls’ peer groups are more likely than those of boys to conform to school values and so to be successful in education. • Peer groups outside school may influence educational achievement e.g. gang culture. • Other reasonable response. 2(e) Against • Gender, not peer group, may be the most important factor in determining educational success. • Ethnicity, not peer group, may be the most important factor in determining educational success. • Social class, not peer group, may be the most important factor in determining educational success. • Home factors may be more important than the peer group, i.e. material/cultural deprivation / parental values and expectations. • School factors may be more important than the peer group, i.e. teacher stereotyping and labelling/setting and streaming/type of school attended. • Marxists would argue that educational success will always be more likely to be achieved by the higher social classes, as education simply reinforces the inequalities seen in society. • Linguistic codes – Bernstein argues that schools operate with an elaborate code which is also shared by the higher social classes. This makes educational achievement more likely for the higher social classes than the lower classes, who use a restricted code. • Functionalists would argue that the education system is fair and based on meritocracy, allowing all who work hard to be successful – only individuals, therefore, can be responsible for their own educational success or failure. • Other reasonable response. Band 0 No creditworthy response. Band 1 (1–4) Answers in this band may be vague and largely based on common sense, showing limited knowledge of whether the peer group is the most influential factor in determining educational achievement. Use of sociological terms or concepts is very unlikely. Responses may be short, undeveloped and one- sided, e.g. ‘children copy their peers’. Lower in the band (1–2 marks), expect one or two weak points. Higher in the band (3–4 marks), candidates may offer more than two points or provide a weak definition of key terms, e.g. ‘a peer group are people who share a similar social position’, in the question. Band 2 (5–8) In this band candidates will show some basic knowledge of whether the peer group is the most influential factor in determining educational achievement. Alternatively, they may offer an answer which is list-like in nature, but there will be no real attempt to assess the issues raised by the question. There may be limited use of sociological terms or concepts. Responses may be underdeveloped and lack range. Answers may be simplistic and two-sided responses are unlikely. Lower in the band, the response will be rather narrow in the points covered and there will be little development. Higher in the band, more points will be covered and there will be limited development of some points, for example ‘peer pressure is rife in schools and can be either negative or positive’. Alternatively, a list-like answer with little development, covering both sides of the argument, may score up to 8 marks. 2(e) A one-sided answer cannot score higher than 8 marks. Band 3 (9–12) Answers in this band will show good sociological knowledge and understanding of whether the peer group is the most influential factor in determining educational achievement. Sociological terms and concepts will be used with greater accuracy and/or frequency. For the most part, answers will be well developed, focused on the question and there will be a range of points presented. There will be a two-sided response but this may be unbalanced. At the bottom of the band, candidates may provide a narrower range of well-developed points. At the top of the band, expect a wider range of points and clear focus on the question. Candidates may outline that for example, ‘The peer group is an important factor in determining educational success in schools. Research shows that ethnic minority males are most likely to form anti-school sub-cultures and that this negatively impacts upon their achievements’. Band 4 (13–15) Answers in this band will show excellent knowledge and understanding of whether the peer group is the most influential factor in determining educational achievement. There will be a strong grasp of the argument, as well as accurate and frequent use of sociological terms and concepts. Answers will be well developed, clearly focused on the question and discuss a wide range of points. Candidates may outline and discuss different explanations for educational achievement, e.g. ‘hidden curriculum, teacher labelling, parental values and expectations, gender roles’. Responses will be two-sided and balanced. At the bottom of the band (13 marks), the answer may lack a specific conclusion. Higher in the band, there will be a clear attempt to offer an assessment of the ‘To what extent«?’ part of the question through a focused conclusion. Candidates should show consideration of points for and against the idea of whether the peer group is the most influential factor in determining educational achievement, citing some of the examples given. Section C: Crime, deviance and social control
3 Official crime statistics are one way of measuring crime rates. This helps the Government to decide on effective punishments to control crime levels in society. However, they do not account for the dark figure of crime and so their accuracy can be questioned. (a) What is meant by the term ‘dark figure of crime’? [2] (b) Describe two formal agencies of social control. [4] (c) Explain how community sentencing is an effective punishment for crime. [6] (d) Explain why some people adopt a deviant career. [8] (e) To what extent do official crime statistics provide an accurate picture of crime? [15] Section D: Media
35 marks
Mark scheme: 3(a) What is meant by the term ‘dark figure of crime’? 2 The unknown number of crimes committed that are not included in the official statistics. One mark for partial definition, e.g. crime not reported. Two marks for clear definition, e.g. unreported and unrecorded crimes that do not appear in the official statistics. 3(b) Describe two formal agencies of social control. 4 Candidates will describe two formal agencies of social control. Informal agencies should not be credited. Possible answers: • Government – make the laws that determine what is considered criminal. • Police – have the power of arrest and act as enforcers of the laws; a public deterrent. • Armed forces – can use physical force and weaponry to ensure conformity to the law. • Prison/the penal system – takes away an individual’s freedom as punishment for non-conformity to the law; keeps criminals out of society. • The judiciary/courts – decide whether an individual is guilty or not guilty and appropriate sentences for guilty parties. • Other reasonable response. One mark for each point correctly identified (up to maximum of two). One mark for each point that is developed (up to maximum of two). 3(c) Explain how community sentencing is an effective punishment for 6 crime. Candidates need to demonstrate an understanding of the ways in which community sentencing can be an effective punishment for crime. Possible answers: • It is a cheaper alternative to the penal system. • It makes offenders give something back to the community that they have committed crimes against. • It can often be a public punishment, e.g. offenders in public wearing a ‘uniform’ deters others from committing crime and humiliates the offender. • Rehabilitation – makes offenders realise there are consequences for their actions. • Often thought to be a fair system of punishment – the punishment fits the crime, i.e. if you vandalise a park you will be made to clean that park. • Specific examples of community sentencing may be discussed in terms of its effectiveness, e.g. tagging, curfews, community service. • Other reasonable response. Band 0 No creditworthy response. Band 1 (1–3) Answers in this band will show only a limited awareness of how community sentencing is an effective punishment for crime. Responses may be short and un-/underdeveloped. Candidates may be confused as to what is meant by community sentencing. At the bottom of the band (1 mark), expect one weak point. Higher in the band (2–3 marks), candidates may offer more than one weak point, but there may be a tendency towards simplistic answers, engaging with sociological ideas without using sociological language, e.g. ‘ways of making people make up for the crime they have committed’. Band 2 (4–6) A clear and accurate explanation showing good sociological knowledge and understanding of how community sentencing is an effective punishment for crime. Sociological terms and concepts should be expected. Candidates may refer to public safety, rehabilitation, consequences, deterrence, fair justice etc. with examples. At the bottom of the band, the range of points covered may be narrow or lack detail. Higher in the band, answers will cover more than one factor in a well-developed way, or cover several factors in less detail. 3(d) Explain why some people adopt a deviant career. 8 Candidates need to identify what is meant by the term ‘deviant career’ and explain why they are adopted. Candidates may focus on specific social groups here (ethnic minorities, males, the working class etc.) or engage with more general theoretical explanations. These are all fine to credit. Possible answers: • Increasing role of a global media in society means that a wide variety of images and definitions of deviant/criminal youth can be seen, resulting in imitation and role modelling amongst people, e.g. copying criminal behaviour that is seen. • Gang culture – being in a gang involves the adoption of criminal and deviant behaviour, norms and values. • Status frustration – criminal youth sub-cultures may exist in order for some people to gain the status they crave in a society where they don’t feel they get much status. • Sociologist, David Matza, talks about young people ‘drifting’ into criminal sub-cultures. The idea that this is a phase in their life when they have few responsibilities and so can experiment with new norms and values in this stage of transition – crime being one such thing. • A lack of social control in society may lead to a state of anomie in which crime and deviance occur. • Resistance and rebellion – criminal youth sub-cultures are typically dominated by working class ethnic minority males and have been explained by Marxist sociologists as an opportunity for disadvantaged people to express their dissatisfaction with society, and all the pressures to consume that it places upon them through crime. • Excitement – Postmodern sociologists in particular talk about people joining criminal sub-cultures in order to engage in thrill seeking and risk taking behaviour, i.e. joy-riding. • Culture of masculinity – males are socialised through several agencies into the need to prove their masculinity; criminal behaviour is one way to do so. • Labelling theory – people are stereotyped as criminals and targeted by the police and thus this may become their master status via a self-fulfilling prophecy. • Peer group pressure – people may be pressured into criminal behaviour and activities by their peer group. • Criminal socialisation – people in certain localities and environments may grow up learning criminal norms and values, i.e. the illegitimate opportunity structure or through the family. • Unemployment / lack of legitimate opportunity / poverty – people may find it hard to get work and thus turn to crime for the money they need (Marxism). • Other reasonable response. 3(d) Band 0 No creditworthy response. Band 1 (1–3) Answers in this band will show only a limited awareness of why some people adopt a deviant career. Candidates may not fully understand what is meant by a deviant career. Responses may be short and undeveloped, e.g. ‘some people have little money and so turn to crime’. Sociological terms and concepts are unlikely to be used. At the bottom of the band (1 mark), expect one weak point. Higher in the band (2–3 marks), candidates may offer more than one weak point. Band 2 (4–6) Answers in this band will show basic sociological knowledge and understanding of why some people adopt a deviant career. Candidates may say that, e.g. ‘the media promote the ‘gangsta’ lifestyle as glamorous and exciting and so some people copy the deviant role models that they see’. Responses may be underdeveloped and lacking in range. At the bottom of the band, candidates are unlikely to use sociological terms and concepts accurately. Higher in the band, candidates may be beginning to use sociological terms and concepts with greater accuracy. However, some aspects of the answer may only be partially developed. Band 3 (7–8) Answers in this band will show good sociological knowledge and understanding of why some people adopt a deviant career and will be well developed and explained. Candidates may discuss specific sociological theories such as Marxism, culture of masculinity, drift theory, Postmodernism etc. Sociological terms and concepts will be used accurately, overall. Answers will be well focused on the question and there will be a range of reasons presented. At the top of the band explanations will be clear throughout. 3(e) To what extent do official crime statistics provide an accurate picture 15 of crime? Candidates need to show an understanding of whether official crime statistics provide an accurate picture of crime. Candidates may focus on advantages and disadvantages of the crime statistics and/or consider alternative ways of measuring crime within their response. Either approach should be credited. It is unlikely that a balanced argument will be seen for this essay – this should not disadvantage candidates. Possible answers: For: • Official crime statistics are updated regularly and so provide an up- to-date picture of crime. • Official crime statistics are taken from official reports and records from the formal agencies and are therefore a reliable source of information. • The statistics provide a national picture and are therefore representative and generalisable. • Official crime statistics allow comparisons to be made with previous years to discover trends in crime. • Official statistics help the police and Government to prioritise crimes to target and areas to focus their attentions on. • Official crime statistics are easily accessible and so provide the public, often via the media, with information on crime patterns. • Governments are seen as trustworthy and therefore it is perceived that the picture of crime they provide is accurate. • Other reasonable response. 3(e) Against: • The crime statistics are a social construction according to Interpretivists – they tell us more about the decisions made by those who compile the statistics than about the actual, real picture of crime. • Crime statistics may not give a valid picture of crime because they can be manipulated by Government sources – political bias. • Not all crime is reported by the public to the police, e.g. rape and embarrassment. • Not every criminal act is thought of as criminal by the victim e.g. illegal music downloading; therefore it’s not in the official statistics. • Not all crimes that are reported by the public are recorded by the police, e.g. petty crime. • Some social groups are more likely than others to be targeted by the police and so are more likely to be found committing criminal acts and therefore are more likely to be in the official crime statistics. • Not everyone is treated the same by the courts and so some social groups are more likely to be found guilty of a crime than others, e.g. chivalry thesis, institutional racism. • Victim surveys reveal a different picture of crime than that seen in the crime statistics. • Self-report studies show a different picture of offenders than that found in the crime statistics. • The crime statistics hide a large dark figure of crime. • White collar crimes and sexual crimes are notoriously under- represented in the crime statistics (tip of the iceburg). • Other reasonable response. Band 0 No creditworthy response. Band 1 (1–4) Answers in this band may be vague and largely based on common sense, showing limited knowledge of whether the official crime statistics show an accurate picture of crime. Use of sociological terms or concepts is very unlikely. Responses may be short, undeveloped and one-sided, e.g. ‘crime statistics are kept up to date’. Lower in the band (1–2 marks), expect one or two weak points. Higher in the band (3–4 marks), candidates may offer more than two points or provide a weak definition of key terms, e.g. ‘the official crime statistics are the official figures to show the number of crimes and offenders’, as in the question. 3(e) Band 2 (5–8) In this band candidates will show some basic knowledge of whether the official crime statistics show an accurate picture of crime. Alternatively, they may offer an answer which is list-like in nature but there will be no real attempt to assess the issues raised by the question. There may be limited use of sociological terms or concepts. Candidates may discuss some reasons why the official crime statistics do show an accurate picture of crime, i.e. ‘based on factual records, compiled by recognised and trustworthy sources’,. but responses may be underdeveloped and lack range. Answers may be simplistic and two-sided responses are unlikely. Lower in the band, the response will be rather narrow in the points covered and there will be little development. Higher in the band, more points will be covered and there will be limited development of some points. Alternatively, a list-like answer with little development covering both sides of the argument may score up to 8 marks. A one-sided answer cannot score higher than 8 marks. Band 3 (9–12) Answers in this band will show good sociological knowledge and understanding of whether the official crime statistics show an accurate picture of crime. Sociological terms and concepts will be used with greater accuracy and/or frequency. For the most part, answers will be well developed, focused on the question and there will be a range of points presented. Candidates may be able to present a range of points to support the idea that the official crime statistics show an accurate picture of crime, but also be aware of some of the arguments against this, i.e. ‘not all crimes are reported, not all crimes are recorded by the police, the dark figure of crime’. There will be a two-sided response, but this may be unbalanced. At the bottom of the band, candidates may provide a narrower range of well- developed points. At the top of the band, expect a wider range of points and clear focus on the question. Band 4 (13–15) Answers in this band will show excellent knowledge and understanding of whether the official crime statistics show an accurate picture of crime. There will be a strong grasp of the argument, as well as accurate and frequent use of sociological terms and concepts. Answers will be well developed, clearly focused on the question and discuss a wide range of points. For example, candidates may say that ‘the crime statistics provide an accurate picture of crime because they are based on official police and court figures of recognised crimes. However, there are a number of crimes that do not appear in the statistics and many sociologists believe they merely show the tip of the iceberg. Not everyone has the same chance of appearing in the official crime statistics and so Interpretivist sociologists often claim that they are socially constructed and invalid.’. Responses will be two-sided and balanced. At the bottom of the band (13 marks), the answer may lack a specific conclusion. Higher in the band, there will be a clear attempt to offer an assessment of the ‘To what extent«?’ part of the question through a focused conclusion. Candidates should show consideration of points for and against the idea of whether the official crime statistics show an accurate picture of crime, citing some of the examples given. Section D: Media
4 The media are thought to be a very powerful agency of socialisation that can affect the audience’s attitudes and behaviour. The traditional media have been accused of creating and reinforcing stereotypical representations, but many believe that these are now beginning to change. (a) What is meant by the term ‘traditional media’? [2] (b) Describe two media gatekeepers. [4] (c) Explain how different social groups use the media differently. [6] (d) Explain why developments in new media are changing how social groups are represented. [8] (e) To what extent do the media affect voting patterns? [15]
35 marks
Mark scheme: 4(a) What is meant by the term ‘traditional media’? 2 Print and other, older media, such as film and radio, that have little, if any, interactivity. One mark for partial definition, e.g. magazines. Two marks for clear definition, e.g. old media where there is a one way channel of communication between the producer and a mass audience as seen in TV. 4(b) Describe two media gatekeepers. 4 Candidates will describe two media gatekeepers. These may take the form of a general response or be specific examples of gatekeepers. Either way is fine to credit. Gatekeepers – individuals who control the audience’s access to media information. If two separate and distinct examples are used from the same bullet point, this is fine to credit. Possible answers: • Owners, i.e. Rupert Murdoch/Berlusconi • Editors – of news programmes etc. deciding which stories to include e.g. newsworthiness. • Reporters – deciding what to cover; what to include in the coverage – news values etc. • Advertisers – media companies have to tailor their content to appeal to advertisers. • Audience – make their own decisions on what to consume. • Media conglomerates and corporations, e.g. Disney • Government – censorship, laws and propaganda • Political spin doctors – control a politician’s image and representation. • Other reasonable response. One mark for each point correctly identified (up to maximum of two). One mark for each point developed (up to maximum of two). 4(c) Explain how different social groups use the media differently. 6 Candidates need to demonstrate an understanding of what is meant by different social groups, e.g. based on gender, age, ethnicity and social class. Candidates may choose to cover a wide range of these groups in their answer, or may focus on a smaller number in more detail, e.g. look at social class and consider the different consumption patterns of the working, middle and upper classes. Possible answers: • Males use computer games and new technologies more than females. • Men and women prefer different genres of TV and films, e.g. females consume more soap operas and males more documentaries/sport. • Males are more likely than females to decide on what is to be consumed, and to control recording and streaming devices. • The amount of TV watched increases after the age of 50; • Younger people are more likely than older consumers to engage with new media technologies and user-generated content – the digital divide. • Younger people typically go to the cinema more than older people. • Different social classes read different types of newspapers – typically tabloids for the lower social classes and broadsheets for the higher classes. • The lower social classes tend to watch more light entertainment than the higher social classes, who watch more niche/specialist programmes and channels. • Ethnic minority and immigrant groups are likely to consume more media from their country of origin than majority groups. • Other reasonable response. 4(c) Band 0 No creditworthy response. Band 1 (1–3) Answers in this band will show only a limited awareness of how different social groups use the media differently. Responses may be short and un- /underdeveloped. At the bottom of the band (1 mark), expect one weak point. Higher in the band (2–3 marks), candidates may offer more than one weak point, but there may be a tendency towards simplistic answers, engaging with sociological ideas without using sociological language, e.g. ‘tabloid newspapers are more likely to be read by males and the lower social classes.’ Band 2 (4–6) A clear and accurate explanation showing good sociological knowledge and understanding of how different social groups use the media differently. For example, discussing how males are more likely than females to choose what to watch on TV, how younger groups are more like to engage with interactive new media than older age groups etc. Sociological language and concepts should be expected. At the bottom of the band, the range of points covered may be narrow or lack detail. Higher in the band, answers will cover more than one factor in a well-developed way or cover several factors in less detail. 4(d) Explain why developments in new media are changing how social 8 groups are represented. Candidates should show an awareness of different social groups in the media such as males, the disabled, the elderly etc. and consider why the way these groups are typically represented is changing. This should be linked to developments in new media. Candidates may answer the question in a general way or may focus their discussion more specifically on particular social groups, e.g. youth, females, with specific examples. Possible answers: • Representations in new media mirror social reality and thus when society changes, so does the way the media reflects this, e.g. more working women in society, equals more working women seen in the media – linked to the Pluralist idea of the media giving the audience what they want. • The new media is now global, meaning that a diverse range of representations can be seen and accessed easily, which promotes social change – globalisation and diversity. • The rise of the new media means that the audience are actively involved in creating the representations that we see, rather than these being produced by media owners – interactivity. • Social attitudes and norms are changing and thus the media must reflect this to remain popular, e.g. positive representations of disabled people. • There is less broadcasting and more narrowcasting in new media today, meaning that niche audiences are catered for, which allows for greater diversity in media content and representations. • Owners of the media are no longer just a small, elite group in society, but instead are more diverse and in the new media could be said to be the audience members as well – these differences are reflected in the greater range of representations that are now commonly found in the media. • Changes in the law means that certain representations that were once commonplace are now considered unacceptable – new media must avoid these and offer something new in order to avoid public complaints and litigation, e.g. sexism/racism/ageism. • New media allows the audience to actively comment upon, change, challenge and create the representations of social groups (blogs, social media etc.) • Other reasonable response. 4(d) Band 0 No creditworthy response. Band 1 (1–3) Answers in this band will show only a limited awareness of why representations of different social groups in the media are changing. Candidates may not really understand what is meant by ‘different social groups’. Responses may be short and undeveloped, e.g. ‘attitudes of the audience are changing’, without justification/explanation. Sociological terms and concepts are unlikely to be used. At the bottom of the band (1 mark), expect one weak point. Higher in the band (2–3 marks), candidates may offer more than one weak point. Band 2 (4–6) Answers in this band will show basic sociological knowledge and understanding of why representations of different social groups in the media are changing. Responses may be underdeveloped and lacking in range. Candidates may explain some of the reasons, e.g. changing social attitudes, rise of the new media and user generated content, greater media diversity and choice. At the bottom of the band, candidates are unlikely to use sociological terms and concepts accurately. Higher in the band, candidates may be beginning to use sociological terms and concepts with greater accuracy. However, some aspects of the answer may only be partially developed. Band 3 (7–8) Answers in this band will show good sociological knowledge and understanding of why representations of different social groups in the media are changing and will be well developed and explained. Sociological terms and concepts will be used accurately, overall. Answers will be well focused on the question and there will be a range of reasons presented, e.g. ‘in order to remain popular and viable, the media must give the audience what it wants to see, according to the Pluralists. This means that when social attitudes change, so must the media representations. It is no longer acceptable, for example, to simply show a female in the housewife role’. At the top of the band, explanations will be clear throughout. 4(e) To what extent do the media affect voting patterns? 15 Candidates will need to look at a range of different ways that the media can affect voting patterns. Different types of media may be referred to in a candidate’s answers. Specific examples of voting patterns and outcomes may be discussed. These may be related to the candidate’s own cultural context. Possible answers: For: • Passive audience models, such as the hypodermic needle theory, suggest that the audience believe what they see/hear and thus voting patterns and results will be affected by media coverage. • Media role models may affect how the audience vote and are often used by political parties in advertising campaigns (celebrity endorsement). • Spin doctors can control the representation of politicians in the media and thus affect how the audience vote. • Privately owned media can and do take strong political positions, e.g. in the stories selected, the language used and the opinions expressed – issues of bias. • At election time, political parties make extensive use of the media in order to transmit their messages to the voters – political broadcasts, manifestos, posters etc. • Media reporting of the opinion polls can also influence voting patterns, as they claim to be able to show what the election result is likely to be. • Discussion and debates in the media between political parties and politicians are commonplace, and are an effective way of getting policies across and criticising the opposition; • Use of social media by the political parties allows politicians to interact with the voters and potentially affect voting patterns, e.g. Twitter. • Propaganda and highly censored media in some countries is likely to affect voting patterns. • Other reasonable response. 4(e) Against: • Active audience models, such as the uses and gratifications theory, suggest that the media has little direct effect upon the audience and that the audience can control what media they consume and how it affects them. • Voters today are aware that political parties use the media in an attempt to win votes and thus are unlikely to believe everything they see and hear (Hall – negotiated reading etc.) • The audience will actively choose to switch off/not listen to anything in the media that they disagree with thus their voting patterns will not be affected by the media. • Political socialisation through the family/peer group is likely to be more influential in determining voting patterns than the media. • Social characteristics of the audience, i.e. gender/age/social class/ethnicity are more likely to determine voting patterns than the media. • The audience themselves may influence voting patterns today more than the media can, through their ability to use new media technologies, in order to post comments, create blogs, engage in discussion forums etc. • A large number of people choose not to vote and thus the media will not affect their voting patterns. • Other reasonable response. Band 0 No creditworthy response. Band 1 (1–4) Answers in this band may be vague and largely based on common sense, showing limited knowledge of whether the media affects voting patterns. Use of sociological terms or concepts is very unlikely. Responses may be short, undeveloped and one-sided, e.g. ‘the audience believes what they see/hear in the media’. Lower in the band (1–2 marks), expect one or two weak points. Higher in the band (3–4 marks), candidates may offer more than two points or provide a weak definition of key terms, i.e. voting patterns / how voters choose to vote, in the question. Band 2 (5–8) In this band candidates will show some basic knowledge of whether the media affects voting patterns. Alternatively, they may offer an answer which is list-like in nature, but there will be no real attempt to assess the issues raised by the question. There may be limited use of sociological terms or concepts. Responses may be underdeveloped and lack range. Candidates may give examples of types of media, political parties and leaders, and election results. Answers may be simplistic and two-sided responses are unlikely. Lower in the band, the response will be rather narrow in the points covered and there will be little development. Higher in the band, more points will be covered and there will be limited development of some points. Alternatively, a list-like answer with little development covering both sides of the argument may score up to 8 marks. 4(e) A one-sided answer cannot score higher than 8 marks. Band 3 (9–12) Answers in this band will show good sociological knowledge and understanding of whether the media affects voting patterns. Sociological terms and concepts will be used with greater accuracy and/or frequency. For the most part, answers will be well developed, focused on the question and there will be a range of points presented. Candidates may discuss the hypodermic needle approach, the influence of spin doctors, issues of bias in the media and the reporting of the opinion polls. On the other side of the debate the uses and gratifications theory may be referred to alongside increased audience awareness of and cynicism towards party political broadcasts and advertising. There will be a two-sided response, but this may be unbalanced. At the bottom of the band, candidates may provide a narrower range of well-developed points. At the top of the band, expect a wider range of points and clear focus on the question. Band 4 (13–15) Answers in this band will show excellent knowledge and understanding of whether the media affects voting patterns. There will be a strong grasp of the argument as well as accurate and frequent use of sociological terms and concepts. Answers will be well developed, clearly focused on the question and discuss a wide range of points. Candidates may refer to the increased use of new media and audience interactivity, political socialisation and the wide range of political opinions and viewpoints available in a global media context. Responses will be two-sided and balanced. At the bottom of the band (13 marks), the answer may lack a specific conclusion. Higher in the band, there will be a clear attempt to offer an assessment of the ‘To what extent«?’ part of the question through a focused conclusion. Candidates should show consideration of points for and against the idea of whether the media affects voting patterns, citing some of the examples given.
2 Some sociologists believe that education is key to improving an individual's life chances, others believe that it simply maintains current inequalities in society. There are significant differences between the educational achievement of upper and working class students, which some sociologists argue is caused by different levels of social control. (a) What is meant by the term ‘social control’? [2] (b) Describe two features of the comprehensive system. [4] (c) Explain how schools ensure that pupils conform to social expectations. [6] (d) Explain why there are differences in the educational achievement of upper and working class students. [8] (e) To what extent does education maintain social stratification? [15] Section C: Crime, deviance and social control
35 marks
Mark scheme: 2(a) What is meant by the term ‘social control’? 2 One mark for partial definition, e.g. doing what someone else wants you to. Two marks for clear definition, e.g. the process of persuading or forcing individuals to conform to norms and values. 2(b) Describe two features of the comprehensive system. 4 Possible answers: • schools that take pupils of all different backgrounds, classes and status; • schools that take pupils of all different abilities; • it is open to everyone – inclusive education, not selective; • based on principles of meritocracy in order to create equal opportunities in society (Functionalism); • children from a local area would all go to school together (different ethnicities/social classes, etc.) and so promote tolerance by breaking down social barriers; • often characterised by mixed ability teaching; • other reasonable response. One mark for each point correctly identified (up to maximum of two). One mark for each point that is developed (up to a maximum of two). 2(c) Explain how schools ensure that pupils conform to social 6 expectations. Possible answers: • through socialisation in schools – pupils learn to accept authority and do as they are told; • through formal social control in schools such as detentions, isolation, exclusion, etc.; • through informal social control in schools such as teacher reprimands, warnings, peer pressure, etc.; • through the hidden curriculum – certain norms, values and beliefs are transmitted as normal and thus encourage children to conform to these; • through positive sanctions/rewards – children learn that if they conform they will be praised; • through negative sanctions/punishments – children learn that they will be punished if they don't conform; • through power and authority – students are expected to conform to the rules of those in a higher status; • other reasonable response. Band 0 [0 marks] No creditworthy response. Band 1 [1–3 marks] Answers in this band will show only a limited awareness of how schools ensure that pupils conform to social expectations and may talk about e.g. Children get punished if they don't do what they're told. Responses may be short and un/under developed. At the bottom of the band (1 mark), expect one weak point. Higher in the band (2–3 marks), candidates may offer more than one weak point, but there may be a tendency towards simplistic answers, engaging with sociological ideas without using sociological language. Band 2 [4–6 marks] A clear and accurate explanation, showing good sociological knowledge and understanding of how schools ensure that pupils conform to social expectations. Sociological terms and concepts should be expected e.g. Positive and negative sanctions can both be used by schools to promote conformity. Punishments can be used to shown the negative consequences of not doing what you're told whereas rewards and praise can be used to encourage compliance and future conformity. This would be followed by explanation of factors leading to this. At the bottom of the band, the range of points covered may be narrow or lack detail. Higher in the band, answers will cover more than one factor in a well-developed way or cover several factors in less detail. 2(d) Explain why there are differences in the educational achievement of upper 8 and working class students. Possible answers: • private education is available to the upper class where results are typically better – working class cannot afford this; • private education results in better qualifications than state schools due to smaller class sizes, better facilities and more resources than state schools; • the working class may experience material deprivation so they can't afford such things as private tutoring, internet, revision guides, etc.; • the working class student may be from a family that is not financially able to support them through Higher Education and students may therefore limit their ambitions and aspirations; • working class families may have a poorer diet than the upper class which is thought to affect concentration levels; • the working class student may live in overcrowded conditions that do not offer a quiet place to work and study; • working class students may be labelled as failures by their teachers and thus perform a self-fulfilling prophecy; • the culture of the working class home may not value education to the same degree that the upper class one does and this may affect educational achievement; • the upper class may possess cultural capital which makes educational success easier to achieve; • the language codes of the upper class are likely to match the elaborated codes used in schools and examinations and thus make success easier; • other reasonable response. Band 0 [0 marks] No creditworthy response. Band 1 [1–3 marks] Answers in this band will show only a limited awareness of why there are differences in the educational achievement of the upper and working class. A tendency to description is likely. Responses may be short and undeveloped, e.g. Upper class students go to better schools, stated without explanation. Sociological terms and concepts are unlikely to be used. At the bottom of the band (1 mark), expect one weak point. Higher in the band (2–3 marks), candidates may offer more than one weak point. Band 2 [4–6 marks] Answers in this band will show basic sociological knowledge and understanding of why there are differences in the educational achievement of the upper and working classes. Responses may be underdeveloped and lacking in range, e.g. The upper class are more likely to go to private school where qualifications are better than state schools because of the better facilities and smaller class sizes, etc. At the bottom of the band, candidates are unlikely to use sociological terms and concepts accurately. Higher in the band, candidates may be beginning to use sociological terms and concepts with greater accuracy. However, some aspects of the answer may only be partially developed/explained. 2(d) Band 3 [7–8 marks] 8 Answers in this band will show good sociological knowledge and understanding of why there are differences in the educational achievement of the upper and working classes and will be well developed and explained, e.g. The upper classes possess more cultural capital than the working class meaning that school and educational success is easier for them to access. They use the same linguistic elaborated codes as their teachers and therefore can access textbooks and examinations easier than the working class. Candidates may then expand on the explanation of this and other factors. Sociological terms and concepts will be used accurately overall. Answers will be well focused on the question and there will be a range of reasons presented. At the top of the band explanations will be clear throughout. 2(e) To what extent does education maintain social stratification? 15 SOCIAL STRATIFICATION – the different levels into which societies are divided based on differences such as wealth, gender, ethnicity, class, power and status. Candidates may discuss this as social inequalities. Possible answers: FOR: • private education offers elite privileges to those who can afford to go there and so maintains social stratification; • private tutoring offers benefits and privileges for those able to afford it, resulting in better chances of educational success; • through practices such as the hidden curriculum, inequalities in society are reproduced and maintained in education i.e. gender roles; • in some societies males are prioritised over females in education which means social stratification continues; • many sociologists believe institutional racism is present in education which causes ethnic majority pupils to do better than ethnic minorities and so social stratification continues; • material factors mean that those from the higher classes tend to do better in education – these qualifications allow them to access the better jobs in society and so maintains the status quo; • cultural factors and cultural capital mean that those from the higher social classes and the ethnic majority are likely to be more successful in education as they feel at home in the institution – this maintains social stratification; • linguistic factors such as the use of elaborated code by the higher social classes/majority ethnic group means that they find the language of education easy to understand and use therefore they are more likely to be successful – this maintains social stratification; • the key trend in educational success is that those from the higher social classes/majority ethnic group do better in education – this ensures that their privileged position in the social hierarchy is maintained; • teacher stereotyping and labelling in the classroom is thought to lead to minority ethnic groups/working class pupils doing least well in the system – this maintains the social stratification system in society as little social mobility occurs; • functionalists believe that the positions people hold in the social stratification system are fair and just and thus education helps to place people in the correct position; • other reasonable response. 2(e) AGAINST: 15 • comprehensive education offers equal opportunities to all students to be successful – this means that social mobility is both possible and probable; • functionalists believe that we live in a meritocracy so the ability to improve a person's life chances is available through educational success – this can then alter a person's position in the social stratification system; • Marxists believe that the social stratification system is maintained by the system of capitalism not just education; • feminists believe that the social stratification system is maintained by the system of patriarchy not just education; • equal opportunity programmes in schools means that there are many chances for all students to do well and challenge their position in the social stratification system e.g. girls into STEM, etc.; • compensatory education attempts to alter the social stratification system be offering positive discrimination to disadvantaged social groups e.g. ethnic minority pupils; • education can be seen to challenge rather than maintain the social stratification system through the opportunities that it offers students; • positive role models exist in education for those groups of students who are not placed highly in the social stratification system i.e. female, working class and/or ethnic minority teachers; • other reasonable response. Band 0 [0 marks] No creditworthy response. Band 1 [1–4 marks] Answers in this band may be vague and largely based on common sense showing limited knowledge of whether education maintains social stratification. Use of sociological terms or concepts is very unlikely. Responses may be short, undeveloped and one-sided, e.g. If you buy an education you will get the best results OR The most powerful people do best in education. Lower in the band (1–2 marks) expect one or two weak points. Higher in the band (3–4 marks) candidates may offer more than two points or provide a weak definition of key terms in the question, e.g. social stratification means dividing people up. 2(e) Band 2 [5–8 marks] 15 In this band candidates will show some basic knowledge of whether education maintains social stratification. Alternatively, they may offer an answer which is list-like in nature but there will be no real attempt to assess the issues raised by the question. There may be limited/some use of sociological terms or concepts. Responses may be underdeveloped and lack range. Answers may be simplistic and two-sided responses are unlikely e.g. Private schools get the best results so people that go there also get the best jobs OR Males are prioritised in education in some cultures so this gives them advantages in society, etc. Lower in the band, the response will be rather narrow in the points covered and there will be little development. Higher in the band, more points will be covered and there will be limited development of some points. Alternatively, a list-like answer with little development covering both sides of the argument may score up to 8 marks. A one-sided answer cannot score higher than 8 marks. Band 3 [9–12 marks] Answers in this band will show good sociological knowledge and understanding of whether education maintains social stratification. Sociological terms and concepts will be used with greater accuracy and/or frequency. For the most part, answers will be well-developed, focused on the question and there will be a range of points presented. Candidates may say that e.g. Despite those from the most privileged backgrounds continuing to do the best in education, many opportunities exist for disadvantaged groups to be successful in increasingly meritocratic societies – such as scholarships, positive discrimination, compensatory education etc. There will be a two- sided response but this may be unbalanced. At the bottom of the band, candidates may provide a narrower range of well-developed points. At the top of the band, expect a wider range of points and clear focus on the question. Band 4 [13–15 marks] Answers in this band will show excellent knowledge and understanding of whether education maintains social stratification. There will be a strong grasp of the argument as well as accurate and frequent use of sociological terms and concepts. Answers will be well developed, clearly focused on the question and discuss a wide range of points. Responses will be two-sided and balanced. At the bottom of the band (13 marks), the answer may lack a specific conclusion. Higher in the band, there will be a clear attempt to offer an assessment of the ‘To what extent«?’ part of the question through a focused conclusion. Candidates should show consideration of points for and against the idea of education maintaining social stratification, citing some of the examples given.
3 According to media representations and official measurements of crime, white-collar crime is unusual in society. Marxists do not believe that this reflects an accurate picture of offending. If Marxists are correct then the punishments and deterrents currently used to control crime may not be effective. (a) What is meant by the term ‘white-collar crime’? [2] (b) Describe two deterrents to crime. [4] (c) Explain how victim surveys can be used to measure crime. [6] (d) Explain why the media can influence how people think about crime. [8] (e) To what extent does Marxist theory explain why some people commit crime? [15] Section D: Media
35 marks
Mark scheme: 3(a) What is meant by the term ‘white-collar crime’? 2 One mark for partial definition, e.g. fraud examples of white collar crimes with no definition should be classed as ‘partial’. Two marks for clear definition, e.g. non-violent crime committed by people in the course of their (middle class) jobs. 3(b) Describe two deterrents to crime. 4 Possible answers: • physical/corporal punishment – preventing crime through the threat of physical harm; • the death penalty – the ultimate sanction/fear factor; • the penal system (prisons) – loss of liberty will prevent crime; • community service – forcing people to give back to the community they have harmed will deter them from crime; • monetary penalties e.g. fines – a financial loss will make people think twice; • demonisation and identification through the media i.e. ‘name and shame’; • rehabilitation – making the offender change their attitudes and behaviour in order to prevent future crimes; • informal social control e.g. family influences and socialisation, religious teachings, losing your job, losing your children, etc.; • negative sanctions (can be formal or informal) that punish you if you do not act in a socially approved way i.e. are criminal; • other reasonable response. One mark for each point correctly identified (up to maximum of two). One mark for each point that is developed (up to a maximum of two). 3(c) Explain how victim surveys can be used to measure crime. 6 VICTIM SURVEY – research that asks people what crimes they have been victims of. Candidates may refer to local and/or national victim surveys in their response or may talk about victim surveys more generally. Specific examples may also be discussed e.g. BCS, CSEW, feminist victim surveys (e.g. Campbell), Left realist victim surveys (e.g. Young). Possible answers: • respondents are likely to be willing to report to researchers crimes that they have been a victim of but haven’t necessarily reported to the police; • they ask people what crimes they have been a victim of; • they can be used to uncover more of the hidden figure of crime as they include those crimes not reported to/recorded by the police; • victim surveys can show new patterns in crime based on more valid information than the OCS e.g. the BCS has discovered that young working class males in cities are the most likely to be crime victims; • victim surveys can be large scale and used to measure victimisation across a country e.g. the BCS; • victim surveys can be conducted on a local scale to uncover patterns and experiences of victimisation in a local area i.e. the Islington survey; • victim surveys are often anonymous and this encourages victims to be honest in their responses; • some victim surveys (typically local ones) use interview questions in order to gain a rapport with the victim to fully understand their feelings; • other reasonable response. Band 0 [0 marks] No creditworthy response. Band 1 [1–3 marks] Answers in this band will show only a limited awareness of how victim surveys can be used to measure crime and may talk about e.g. Showing the real picture of victimisation. Responses may be short and un/under developed. At the bottom of the band (1 mark), expect one weak point. Higher in the band (2–3 marks), candidates may offer more than one weak point, but there may be a tendency towards simplistic answers, engaging with sociological ideas without using sociological language. Band 2 [4–6 marks] A clear and accurate explanation, showing good sociological knowledge and understanding of how victim surveys can be used to measure crime. Sociological terms and concepts should be expected e.g. Victim surveys can reveal a more valid picture of crime than the OCS as they also include crimes that have not been reported to the police i.e. the dark figure of crime. This would be followed by explanation of factors leading to this. At the bottom of the band, the range of points covered may be narrow or lack detail. Higher in the band, answers will cover more than one factor in a well-developed way or cover several factors in less detail. 3(d) Explain why the media can influence how people think about crime. 8 Candidates may discuss factual (e.g. news) media or fictional media (e.g. crime thrillers, films), etc. Possible answers: • most people have little direct contact with crime, therefore how the media represent it will determine how they think about it; • despite evidence to the contrary, most people believe crime is rising and is a serious problem – this view is said to come from the media; • the media create moral panics about crime and label some groups as folk devils – the audience believes this to be true so influences ideas about crime; • the media is global and heavily used by most people – this gives it a great deal of power over the way we think about crime/criminals; • media role models and/or opinion leaders often influence how the audience think i.e. about crime; • media show stereotypical representations of some social groups as criminal e.g. ethnic minorities, males, youth which causes people to think these people are most likely to be criminal; • media focuses typically on street and working class crime, ignoring white-collar crime and criminals – this influences how people think about the ‘crime problem’ and criminals; • other reasonable response. Band 0 [0 marks] No creditworthy response. Band 1 [1–3 marks] Answers in this band will show only a limited awareness of why the media is thought to be influential in determining how we think about crime. A tendency to description is likely. Responses may be short and undeveloped, e.g. The media is used a lot stated without explanation. Sociological terms and concepts are unlikely to be used. At the bottom of the band (1 mark), expect one weak point. Higher in the band (2–3 marks), candidates may offer more than one weak point. Band 2 [4–6 marks] Answers in this band will show basic sociological knowledge and understanding of why the media is thought to be influential in determining how we think about crime. Responses may be underdeveloped and lacking in range, e.g. The media are an important source of knowledge for the audience and as most of us have little direct contact with crime, they become the primary source of information for us, etc. At the bottom of the band, candidates are unlikely to use sociological terms and concepts accurately. Higher in the band, candidates may be beginning to use sociological terms and concepts with greater accuracy. However, some aspects of the answer may only be partially developed/explained. 3(d) Band 3 [7–8 marks] 8 Answers in this band will show good sociological knowledge and understanding of why the media is thought to be influential in determining how we think about crime and will be well developed and explained, e.g. The media create moral panics about crime in which a social group is portrayed as a folk devil and blamed for crime. That social group becomes stigmatised and the audience start to label them negatively as criminals. They can then expand on the explanation of this and other factors as necessary. Sociological terms and concepts will be used accurately overall. Answers will be well focused on the question and there will be a range of reasons presented. At the top of the band explanations will be clear throughout. 3(e) To what extent does Marxist theory explain why some people commit 15 crime? Candidates should explain how Marxism explains why some people commit crime. Flaws in this theory could then be discussed alongside other explanations for why crime is committed in evaluation. Possible answers: FOR: • the working class are criminalised/labelled by the ruling class in order that they do not question the status quo i.e. to accept a false class consciousness; • laws are created to reflect the interests of the ruling class and therefore the crimes of the working class are more visible and more likely to be prosecuted; • the working class may rebel and resist against the perceived inequalities caused by capitalism and so turn to crime e.g. CCCS research into deviant youth sub-cultures; • because society is capitalist, inequalities are manifold and this can lead to material deprivation for some disadvantaged social groups, leading eventually to crime; • marginalisation – the working class do not really have organisations to protect their interests so they have no other outlet for their frustrations than violence and crime; • alienation – the working class may not feel like they are highly valued in society and may feel that they are exploited for their labour therefore turn to crime; • social exclusion – some lower class people are excluded from full participation in education, work and community life. As they are denied these opportunities for legitimate success, they turn to crime; • status frustration – the working class may commit crime because they have a low status in society and try to improve this through crime; • some members of the ruling class may commit crime because they know they are able to get away with it e.g. fraud; • other reasonable response. 3(e) AGAINST: 15 • Marxist theory can be criticised on the grounds that some laws are clearly in everyone’s interests and do not serve the interests of the ruling class; • perhaps inadequate socialisation is a better explanation for crime; • functionalist explanations for crime i.e. that crime reinforces common values in others, Merton’s strain theory and Cohen’s status frustration; • postmodernism – crime being committed as it is fun and exciting – edgework; • labelling theory – crime is committed because some social groups are labelled as criminal by the media and the police – can lead to deviancy amplification, master status and deviant careers; • crime is committed by males more than females as it is a way to prove their masculinity; • crime is committed due to peer pressure i.e. being in a gang/deviant sub-culture; • most members of the working class do not commit crime; • other reasonable response. Band 0 [0 marks] No creditworthy response. Band 1 [1–4 marks] Answers in this band may be vague and largely based on common sense showing limited knowledge of how Marxism explains why some people commit crime. Use of sociological terms or concepts is very unlikely. Responses may be short, undeveloped and one-sided, e.g. Poor people commit crime for money OR Crime is committed by the working class. Lower in the band (1–2 marks) expect one or two weak points. Higher in the band (3– 4 marks) candidates may offer more than two points or provide a weak definition of key terms, e.g. Marxism criticises capitalism, in the question. 3(e) Band 2 [5–8 marks] 15 In this band candidates will show some basic knowledge of how Marxism explains why some people commit crime. Alternatively, they may offer an answer which is list-like in nature but there will be no real attempt to assess the issues raised by the question. There may be limited/some use of sociological terms or concepts. Responses may be underdeveloped and lack range. Answers may be simplistic and two-sided responses are unlikely e.g. Marxist theory believes working class people commit crime because they don’t have enough money OR Marxism says that the powerful people make the laws, etc. Lower in the band, the response will be rather narrow in the points covered and there will be little development. Higher in the band, more points will be covered and there will be limited development of some points. Alternatively, a list-like answer with little development covering both sides of the argument may score up to 8 marks. A one-sided answer cannot score higher than 8 marks. Band 3 [9–12 marks] Answers in this band will show good sociological knowledge and understanding of how Marxism explains why some people commit crime. Sociological terms and concepts will be used with greater accuracy and/or frequency. For the most part, answers will be well developed, focused on the question and there will be a range of points presented. Candidates may say that e.g. Despite relative deprivation probably being a reason for crime to be committed, poor socialisation at home may also be relevant. There will be a two-sided response but this may be unbalanced. At the bottom of the band, candidates may provide a narrower range of well-developed points. At the top of the band, expect a wider range of points and clear focus on the question. Band 4 [13–15 marks] Answers in this band will show excellent knowledge and understanding of how Marxism explains why some people commit crime. There will be a strong grasp of the argument as well as accurate and frequent use of sociological terms and concepts. Answers will be well developed, clearly focused on the question and discuss a wide range of points. Responses will be two-sided and balanced. At the bottom of the band (13 marks), the answer may lack a specific conclusion. Higher in the band, there will be a clear attempt to offer an assessment of the ‘To what extent«?’ part of the question through a focused conclusion. Candidates should show consideration of points for and against the idea of Marxist explanations for crime, citing some of the examples given.
3 Acts of crime and deviance are often associated with youth sub-cultures. Controlling crime in society is difficult to do. Some sociologists believe that informal agencies of social control are the best way to ensure conformity. Others believe that formal agencies such as prisons are the best deterrent. (a) What is meant by the term ‘deviance’? [2] (b) Describe two problems with official crime statistics. [4] (c) Explain how informal agencies of social control prevent crime. [6] (d) Explain why youth sub-cultures are often linked to crime. [8] (e) To what extent do prisons fail to deter people from committing crime? [15] Section D: Media
35 marks
Mark scheme: 3(a) What is meant by the term ‘deviance’? 2 One mark for partial definition, e.g. illegal activities. Two marks for clear definition, e.g. actions that go against the norms and values of society e.g. committing a crime. 3(b) Describe two problems with official crime statistics. 4 Possible answers: • someone has to realise that a crime has taken place for it to be reported to the police i.e. murder of a homeless man; • the crime committed has to be reported to the police to appear in the OCS and this doesn't always happen i.e. due to fear of reprisals, embarrassment, knowing the perpetrator etc.; • crimes that involve insured articles are the most likely to be reported to the police which will skew the picture of crime seen in the OCS; • there is a large 'dark figure of crime' that is not known about and therefore does not appear in the OCS; • crimes have to be recorded by the police to appear in the OCS – police discretion means that this doesn't always happen; • different police forces and police officers will deal with crime differently meaning that the OCS's picture of crime may not be valid; • police targeting strategies affect which crimes are concentrated on; • crime statistics may be manipulated by the government/ruling class and therefore may be biased and so do not show a valid picture of all crimes committed; • official crime statistics often focus on the visible, street crimes typically associated with the working class rather than more middle class white- collar/corporate crimes therefore are not accurate; • other reasonable response. One mark for each point correctly identified (up to maximum of two). One mark for each point that is developed (up to a maximum of two). 3(c) Explain how informal agencies of social control prevent crime. 6 Candidates need to show an understanding of how informal agencies of social control such as the media, family and education can prevent crime. It is likely that several different agencies will be discussed but candidates could answer the question by focusing on just one informal agency. This would not be sufficient range, however, to score full marks. Alternatively, answers may look at informal methods of control in a more general way in terms of processes. Possible answers: • informal agencies cause individuals to internalise society's norms and values and to conform to these therefore preventing crime; • informal agencies of social control can use punishments and negative sanctions to prevent individuals committing crime; • informal agencies can use praise and positive sanctions to encourage individuals to follow the law and so prevent crime; • the media – reporting about crime in the media shows individuals the negative consequences of their actions if they choose to commit a crime; • religion has many rules that believers must follow and these ensure that morals are taught and so help to prevent crime; • the workplace will dismiss or discipline individuals who break the law; • the family impose punishments to prevent illegal behaviour and use primary socialisation to teach people right from wrong; • other reasonable response. Band 0 [0 marks] No creditworthy response. Band 1 [1–3 marks] Answers in this band will show only a limited awareness of how informal agencies of social control prevent crime and may talk about e.g. they give punishments to people committing crimes. Responses may be short and un/under developed. At the bottom of the band (1 mark), expect one weak point. Higher in the band (2–3 marks), candidates may offer more than one weak point, but there may be a tendency towards simplistic answers, engaging with sociological ideas without using sociological language. Band 2 [4–6 marks] A clear and accurate explanation, showing good sociological knowledge and understanding of awareness of how informal agencies of social control prevent crime and may talk about sociological terms and concepts should be expected e.g. The media use role models to socialise individuals into the right ways of behaving in society. This is then imitated in society and so serves to prevent crime. This would be followed by explanation of factors leading to this. At the bottom of the band, the range of points covered may be narrow or lack detail. Higher in the band, answers will cover more than one factor in a well-developed way or cover several factors in less detail. 3(d) Explain why youth sub-cultures are often linked to crime. 8 Candidates may talk about youth sub-cultures generally (i.e. style based, criminal, deviant etc.) or may focus on particular examples such as the Skins, gangs etc. Possible answers: • young people are most susceptible to peer pressure and so join a sub- culture where crime is the norm; • youth sub-cultures may be a form of resistance to a perceived inequality in society – crime can therefore be justified e.g. the Skins resisting class inequalities through crime and deviance; • youth sub-cultures are perceived to be exciting and thrill seeking – committing crimes may simply be an extension of this for young people (Postmodernism); • youth sub-cultures may be joined when young people experience status frustration in society – the group allows for status to be achieved in alternative ways (Cohen); • youth sub-cultures may offer an alternative set of values to mainstream society which appeal to young people – this may involve criminal or deviant behaviour i.e. taking drugs; • youth sub-cultures can be used as part of the illegitimate opportunity structure when legitimate opportunities for success in society are limited e.g. gangs – this is particularly true for working class youth (Cloward and Ohlin); • youth sub-cultures are often linked with being masculine – young boys demonstrate toughness through crime in order to prove how ‘manly’ they are, this is part of a youth’s status (Miller focal concerns); • criminal activities of ethnic minority youth sub-cultures may be as a response to racism in society e.g. riots; • other reasonable response. Band 0 [0 marks] No creditworthy response. Band 1 [1–3 marks] Answers in this band will show only a limited awareness of why youth sub- cultures are linked to crime. A tendency to description is likely. Responses may be short and undeveloped, e.g. youths want money for alcohol and drugs stated without explanation. Sociological terms and concepts are unlikely to be used. At the bottom of the band (1 mark), expect one weak point. Higher in the band (2–3 marks), candidates may offer more than one weak point. 3(d) Band 2 [4–6 marks] 8 Answers in this band will show basic sociological knowledge and understanding of why youth sub-cultures are linked to crime. Responses may be underdeveloped and lacking in range, e.g. Youth sub-cultures may form in working class areas where there are few jobs. OR Youth sub- cultures offer excitement through committing crimes for young people who are bored etc. At the bottom of the band, candidates are unlikely to use sociological terms and concepts accurately. Higher in the band, candidates may be beginning to use sociological terms and concepts with greater accuracy. However, some aspects of the answer may only be partially developed /explained. Band 3 [7–8 marks] Answers in this band will show good sociological knowledge and understanding of why youth sub-cultures are linked to crime and will be well developed and explained, e.g. It is typically young people from ethnic minorities and the working class who join a sub-culture. Legitimate opportunities for success may be limited in society and so they use sub- cultures to gain status – gangs are a good example of this. Sometimes they can be used to make a living, by selling drugs for example, as the young people in the sub-cultures are experiencing material deprivation. Cloward and Ohlin found this in their study of the illegitimate opportunity structure. They can then expand on the explanation of this and other factors as necessary. Sociological terms and concepts will be used accurately overall. Answers will be well focused on the question and there will be a range of reasons presented. At the top of the band explanations will be clear throughout. 3(e) To what extent do prisons fail to deter people from committing crime? Candidates should discuss the various ways that prisons may not deter people from committing crime. This may include how other agencies /sanctions e.g. the family are more effective deterrents. They may then consider why prison may well be an effective deterrent as evaluation. Possible answers: FOR: • re-offending rates are high therefore prison cannot be that much of a deterrent; • some people see prison as an 'easy ride' and therefore are not worried about being sent there; • for some people prison provides food, shelter and heating which is better than life on the outside therefore it is not a deterrent at all; • prison can be referred to as a 'university of crime' – criminals become better criminals when inside – therefore it is not a deterrent at all; • some people want to go to prison in order to access the comprehensive counselling, rehabilitation, treatment, education, training programmes that are available – prison therefore is not a deterrent; • punishments that involve some kind of 'putting things right' i.e. community service, are thought by many to be more effective than just locking someone away as they understand the consequence of their actions; • many people believe that informal agents of social control i.e. the family, are more effective deterrents to crime than impersonal formal agents such as prisons; • other sanctions such as surveillance, curfews, community sentences, fines and tags are thought by many to be more effective deterrents than prison as they carry shame and humiliation and/or financial implications with them which prevents further re-offending; • more serious sanctions such as the death penalty are thought by many to be a far greater deterrent to crime than prison; • other reasonable response. AGAINST: • prisons act as a deterrent because by sending someone there other people can see the consequence of criminal actions and so are put off from offending themselves; • prisons incapacitate people and this is a deterrent as people do not want to lose their freedom; • rehabilitation programmes are often a compulsory part of prison life and this may put people off offending as they do not want to be a part of this; • prisons are often portrayed as violent and dangerous places (e.g. in the media) and people are scared of this therefore this acts as a deterrent to crime; • people do not want to be unable to spend time with their loved ones and so prison acts as a deterrent; • a prison sentence brings with it a prison/criminal record and people are aware that this will make finding work difficult therefore this acts as a deterrent to crime; • other reasonable response. 3(e) Band 0 [0 marks] 15 No creditworthy response. Band 1 [1–4 marks] Answers in this band may be vague and largely based on common sense showing limited knowledge of whether prisons fail to deter people from committing crime. Use of sociological terms or concepts is very unlikely. Responses may be short, undeveloped and one-sided, e.g. Prisons are shown as easy places to be in the media. OR Prisons teach you how to be a better criminal. Lower in the band (1–2 marks) expect one or two weak points. Higher in the band (3–4 marks) candidates may offer more than two points or provide a weak definition of key terms, e.g. fail to deter means to not put you off something, in the question. Band 2 [5–8 marks] In this band candidates will show some basic knowledge of whether prisons fail to deter people from committing crime. Alternatively, they may offer an answer which is list-like in nature but there will be no real attempt to assess the issues raised by the question. There may be limited/some use of sociological terms or concepts. Responses may be underdeveloped and lack range. Answers may be simplistic and two-sided responses are unlikely e.g. prisons aren't tough enough on prisoners and they provide food and shelter and therefore aren't seen as a negative sanction by criminals etc. Lower in the band, the response will be rather narrow in the points covered and there will be little development. Higher in the band, more points will be covered and there will be limited development of some points. Alternatively, a list-like answer with little development covering both sides of the argument may score up to 8 marks. A one-sided answer cannot score higher than 8 marks. Band 3 [9–12 marks] Answers in this band will show good sociological knowledge and understanding of whether prisons fail to deter people from committing crime. Sociological terms and concepts will be used with greater accuracy and/or frequency. For the most part, answers will be well developed, focused on the question and there will be a range of points presented. Candidates may say that e.g. prisons are seen by some as the ultimate sanction but others say that the rehabilitation and education/training programs offered by prisons means they are made too attractive to deter people from committing crime. There will be a two-sided response but this may be unbalanced. At the bottom of the band, candidates may provide a narrower range of well- developed points. At the top of the band, expect a wider range of points and clear focus on the question. 3(e) Band 4 [13–15 marks] Answers in this band will show excellent knowledge and understanding of whether prisons fail to deter people from committing crime. There will be a strong grasp of the argument as well as accurate and frequent use of sociological terms and concepts. Answers will be well developed, clearly focused on the question and discuss a wide range of points. Responses will be two-sided and balanced. At the bottom of the band (13 marks), the answer may lack a specific conclusion. Higher in the band, there will be a clear attempt to offer an assessment of the ‘To what extent«?’ part of the question through a focused conclusion. Candidates should show consideration of points for and against the idea of whether prisons fail to deter people from committing crime, citing some of the examples given.
2 Many sociologists believe it is school factors rather than home factors that determine how well an individual does in education. Social control is often necessary as not all students conform to the expectations of a school. For example, not all students can use an elaborated code. (a) What is meant by the term ‘elaborated code’? [2] (b) Describe two ways that schools can affect educational achievement. [4] (c) Explain how members of anti-school sub-cultures are different to other students in schools. [6] (d) Explain why home factors can affect educational achievement. [8] (e) To what extent is education a successful agency of social control? [15] Section C: Crime, deviance and social control
35 marks
Mark scheme: 2(a) What is meant by the term ‘elaborated code’? 2 One mark for partial definition, e.g. talking posh. Two marks for clear definition, e.g. a formal, detailed type of language required in examinations and the education system. 2(b) Describe two ways that schools can affect educational achievement. 4 Candidates may choose to answer the question by referring to general ways or may choose to focus on particular types of schools to make their points. Possible answers: • private schools are thought to have better facilities, smaller class sizes and better teachers than state schools; • the hidden and/or ethnocentric curriculum in schools may affect educational achievement; • teacher labelling in schools may lead to either a self-fulfilling prophecy or the halo effect; • setting and streaming in schools may affect educational achievement; • the use of the elaborated code in schools may benefit or hinder some students i.e. ethnic minorities/the working class; • schools are where some subcultures form i.e. anti-school/pro- school and so this may affect educational achievement; • attending a poor school in a deprived area may negatively affect educational achievement; • comprehensive schools are open to all students and functionalists believe are part of the meritocratic system meaning they allow all students to achieve their potential; • other reasonable response. One mark for each point correctly identified (up to maximum of two). One mark for each point that is developed (up to a maximum of two). 2(c) Explain how members of anti-school sub-cultures are different to other 6 students in schools. Answers may focus on general characteristics of anti-school sub-cultures or may choose to discuss specific anti-school sub-cultures that they have studied. Possible answers: • they may display hyper masculinity – exaggerating male qualities such as toughness; • may be formed through resistance to a perceived injustice i.e. racism; • may be characterised by students who do not value education and therefore do not aspire to achieve academically; • status frustration – students in anti-school sub-cultures may be looking for status that they don’t get in mainstream society; • high rates of truancy and absenteeism; • behaviour that does not conform to school expectations i.e. being cheeky to the teacher, not completing work, etc.; • often being openly racist and/or sexist; • being involved in delinquency and crime both in and outside school; • despising pupils who work and try hard at school; • Willis, ‘The Lads’, working class boys who rebelled against the school and wanted to ‘have a laugh’; • they do not respect authority or conform to school rules or expectations; • other reasonable response. Band 0 [0 marks] No creditworthy response. Band 1 [1–3 marks] Answers in this band will show only a limited awareness of how members of anti-school sub-cultures are different to most students in school and may talk about e.g. They don’t follow the rules OR They truant from school. Responses may be short and un/under developed. At the bottom of the band (1 mark) expect one weak point. Higher in the band (2–3 marks) candidates may offer more than one weak point, but there may be a tendency towards simplistic answers, engaging with sociological ideas without using sociological language. Band 2 [4–6 marks] A clear and accurate explanation, showing good sociological knowledge and understanding of how members of anti-school sub-cultures are different to most students in school. Sociological terms and concepts should be expected e.g. Members of anti-school sub-cultures are typically characterised by being male, working class and from an ethnic minority. They may join these small groups as a result of teachers labelling them as failures, so as a form of resistance. Many suffer from status frustration in wider society. This would be followed by explanation of factors leading to this. At the bottom of the band, the range of points covered may be narrow or lack detail. Higher in the band, answers will cover more than one factor in a well-developed way or cover several factors in less detail. 2(d) Explain why home factors can affect educational achievement. 8 Candidates may talk generally about home factors or may link these specifically with educational achievement according to gender, ethnicity, social class, etc. Possible answers: • material factors such as money, number of rooms in a house, poor diet, etc.; • cultural factors such as how much education is valued, cultural deprivation e.g. not having books at home; • linguistic codes from the home such as speaking elaborated or restricted codes or a different first language to the majority; • cultural capital (or lack of it) – knowledge, books, classical music, etc.; • gender – differential socialisation/social control, etc., i.e. the bedroom culture – McRobbie and Garber; • social class – living in a deprived area with low aspirations at home; • ethnicity – speaking a different language at home than that used in school, parents not being able to help with homework, liaise with teachers, etc.; • the community and peer group an individual is a part of depending on their home may affect educational achievement e.g. gangs; • other reasonable response. Band 0 [0 marks] No creditworthy response. Band 1 [1–3 marks] Answers in this band will show only a limited awareness of why home factors can affect educational achievement. A tendency to description is likely. Responses may be short and undeveloped, e.g. Not having your own bedroom to study quietly in stated without explanation. Sociological terms and concepts are unlikely to be used. At the bottom of the band (1 mark) expect one weak point. Higher in the band (2–3 marks) candidates may offer more than one weak point. 2(d) Band 2 [4–6 marks] Answers in this band will show basic sociological knowledge and understanding of why home factors can affect educational achievement. Responses may be underdeveloped and lacking in range, e.g. If parents at home do not value education then it is unlikely that they will push their children to succeed and do well meaning that the children may under-perform at school, etc. At the bottom of the band, candidates are unlikely to use sociological terms and concepts accurately. Higher in the band, candidates may be beginning to use sociological terms and concepts with greater accuracy. However, some aspects of the answer may only be partially developed/explained. Band 3 [7–8 marks] Answers in this band will show good sociological knowledge and understanding of why home factors can affect educational achievement and will be well-developed and explained, e.g. Girls and boys are often socialised very differently and this may affect educational achievement. Girls are canalised to be passive and often form a bedroom culture where studying is both highly valued and the norm. Boys, on the other hand, will spend more time outside of the home with their peer group and will be less likely to value studying at school. They can then expand on the explanation of this and other factors as necessary. Sociological terms and concepts will be used accurately overall. Answers will be well focused on the question and there will be a range of reasons presented. At the top of the band explanations will be clear throughout. 2(e) To what extent is education a successful agency of social control? 15 Candidates are likely to discuss both agencies and processes of social control in their answer although this is not essential. The ability of education to use both informal and formal methods of control may be discussed. Possible answers: FOR: • negative sanctions e.g. detentions are used ensuring students conform; • positive sanctions such as rewards and praise are used to encourage students to work and try hard; • teachers can use formal measures to control and discipline students – these may be physical or instructive; • norms and values conveyed through the hidden curriculum present certain behaviours as normal and others as wrong – this socialisation controls both behaviour and thoughts; • the peer group can be a way of controlling pupils in school i.e. through peer pressure and sanctions; • setting and streaming can control students through determining how intelligent they are thought to be and therefore their access to educational opportunities and stretch and challenge; • feminism – they see education as a form of patriarchal control e.g. through gendered subject choice; • Marxism – education promotes ruling class ideologies and normalises the inequalities in capitalism as fair and just; • functionalism – social control is an essential function of the education system, leading to social order and cohesion; • other reasonable response. AGAINST: • too deterministic – students can reject the core norms and values of school i.e. through an anti-school subculture; • schools increasingly encourage critical thinking and freedom of thought through their coverage of topical and often controversial issues; • students do not have to live up to teacher labelling – they can also reject it and determine their own path – a self-negating prophecy; • now that physical and corporal punishment is outlawed in many countries, the ability of schools to control their pupils is limited; • primary agents of social control may be more effective as they spend longer with children and are with them from an earlier age; • other agencies of secondary socialisation (e.g. media, workplace) may be more effective or just as effective as a means of social control; • other reasonable response. 2(e) Band 0 [0 marks] No creditworthy response. Band 1 [1–4 marks] Answers in this band may be vague and largely based on common sense showing limited knowledge of whether education is a successful agency of social control. Use of sociological terms or concepts is very unlikely. Responses may be short, undeveloped and one-sided, e.g. Education teaches children discipline and respect. If students misbehave in school then they get punished. Lower in the band (1–2 marks) expect one or two weak points. Higher in the band (3–4 marks) candidates may offer more than two points or provide a weak definition of key terms, e.g. Agencies of social control are the things like the family that tell us what to do, in the question. Band 2 [5–8 marks] In this band candidates will show some basic knowledge of whether education is a successful agency of social control. Alternatively, they may offer an answer which is list-like in nature but there will be no real attempt to assess the issues raised by the question. There may be limited/some use of sociological terms or concepts. Responses may be underdeveloped and lack range. Answers may be simplistic and two-sided responses are unlikely e.g. Schools use punishments such as detentions and letters home to teach children that there are consequences to bad behaviour, etc. Lower in the band, the response will be rather narrow in the points covered and there will be little development. Higher in the band, more points will be covered and there will be limited development of some points. Alternatively, a list-like answer with little development covering both sides of the argument may score up to 8 marks. A one-sided answer cannot score higher than 8 marks. 2(e) Band 3 [9–12 marks] Answers in this band will show good sociological knowledge and understanding of whether education is a successful agency of social control. Sociological terms and concepts will be used with greater accuracy and/or frequency. For the most part, answers will be well-developed, focused on the question and there will be a range of points presented. Candidates may say that e.g. Despite education using negative sanctions to ensure students conform, primary agents such as the family may be more effective at social control as they are with the individual for longer and from an earlier age. There will be a two-sided response but this may be unbalanced. At the bottom of the band, candidates may provide a narrower range of well-developed points. At the top of the band, expect a wider range of points and clear focus on the question. Band 4 [13–15 marks] Answers in this band will show excellent knowledge and understanding of whether education is a successful agency of social control. There will be a strong grasp of the argument as well as accurate and frequent use of sociological terms and concepts. Answers will be well-developed, clearly focused on the question and discuss a wide range of points. Responses will be two-sided and balanced. At the bottom of the band (13 marks), the answer may lack a specific conclusion. Higher in the band, there will be a clear attempt to offer an assessment of the ‘To what extent«?’ part of the question through a focused conclusion. Candidates should show consideration of points for and against the idea of education being a successful agent of social control, citing some of the examples given.
3 There are many explanations offered by sociologists as to why some individuals adopt a deviant career. Most members of society want the formal agencies of social control to deal with this problem but there are some sociologists who believe that crime can be positive for society. (a) What is meant by the term ‘deviant career’? [2] (b) Describe two informal agencies of social control. [4] (c) Explain how crime is relative. [6] (d) Explain why functionalists believe we have crime and deviance in society. [8] (e) To what extent is the crime rate affected by police stereotypes? [15] Section D: Media
35 marks
Mark scheme: 3(a) What is meant by the term ‘deviant career’? 2 One mark for partial definition, e.g. being a criminal. Two marks for clear definition, e.g. when people labelled as ‘deviant’ have legitimate opportunities blocked so they turn to crime as a source of income and status. 3(b) Describe two informal agencies of social control. 4 Formal agencies must not be credited in any answers. Possible answers: • the family – through positive and negative sanctions; • the education system – through, for example, the hidden curriculum; • the media – through role modelling, stereotyping and imitation; • the peer group – through things such as peer pressure, exclusion, etc.; • religion – through expected codes of conduct and dress, sanctions, etc.; • the workplace – through re-socialisation into company norms, values and expectations; • other reasonable response. One mark for each point correctly identified (up to maximum of two). One mark for each point that is developed (up to a maximum of two). 3(c) Explain how crime is relative. 6 Candidates need to show an understanding of the concept of ‘relativity’ here – demonstrating that there is no one definition of crime and that it is therefore socially constructed. Possible answers: • different cultures define crime differently e.g. it is illegal for Muslims to drink alcohol; • definitions of crime vary over time e.g. it is now a crime in most European counties to smoke in a public place; • different countries and societies define crime differently e.g. in America it is illegal to drink alcohol under the age of 21; • the role a person is playing can often determine whether something is perceived as a crime e.g. it is legal for a soldier to kill another human being on the battlefield but this would be classed as murder were a non-soldier to do it; • whether something is criminal or not may depend upon the situation e.g. it would be a criminal offence to be naked in public but this is perfectly acceptable in the privacy of your own home; • religious beliefs may determine whether something is criminal e.g. Muslim men are allowed more than one wife whereas for Christians this would be defined as bigamy; • whether the perpetrator can be seen to be culpable or not may decide whether the act is defined as criminal or not e.g. a person with mental health issues or a mental disability; • other reasonable response. Band 0 [0 marks] No creditworthy response. Band 1 [1–3 marks] Answers in this band will show only a limited awareness of the concept of relativity and may talk about e.g. People view crime differently. Responses may be short and un/under developed. At the bottom of the band (1 mark) expect one weak point. Higher in the band (2–3 marks) candidates may offer more than one weak point, but there may be a tendency towards simplistic answers, engaging with sociological ideas without using sociological language. Band 2 [4–6 marks] A clear and accurate explanation, showing good sociological knowledge and understanding of the relationship between crime and relativity, e.g. Crime is relative because it is not a fixed term. One of the factors that affects whether something is defined as a crime is who commits it and the role they are playing. A policeman can physically restrain another human and use weapons to control him/her. However, were a non-policeman to do this it would be a criminal offence. This would be followed by explanation of factors leading to this. At the bottom of the band, the range of points covered may be narrow or lack detail. Higher in the band, answers will cover more than one factor in a well-developed way or cover several factors in less detail. 3(d) Explain why functionalists believe we have crime and deviance in 8 society. Candidates may discuss traditional functionalist explanations in their answer and/or strain theory, status frustration and New Right views. Possible answers: • a limited amount of crime in society is seen as beneficial to society – laws and punishments reinforce shared values; • crime can act as a ‘warning function’ that society is not running smoothly and that social change is necessary; • degradation ceremonies i.e. public hangings, remind members of society of the importance of conformity and deter them from committing crime; • Merton’s strain theory – crime may be committed when the goals of society cannot be achieved legitimately; • Cohen – status frustration – inequalities in society frustrate people as they cannot achieve their status legitimately, causing them to turn to crime; • inadequate socialisation in the family may cause some people to turn to crime; • Eisenstadt/Parsons believe delinquency is a transitional stage that allows teenagers to make mistakes before becoming adults; • crime and deviance flag up to government the need for change; • New Right (Murray) believe crime is caused through the inadequate socialisation from single parents and the feckless underclass; • other reasonable response. Band 0 [0 marks] No creditworthy response. Band 1 [1–3 marks] Answers in this band will show only a limited awareness of why we have crime and deviance in society. A tendency to description is likely. Responses may be short and undeveloped, e.g. Seeing criminals get punished scares people stated without explanation. Sociological terms and concepts are unlikely to be used. At the bottom of the band (1 mark) expect one weak point. Higher in the band (2–3 marks) candidates may offer more than one weak point. Band 2 [4–6 marks] Answers in this band will show basic sociological knowledge and understanding of why we have crime and deviance in society. Responses may be underdeveloped and lacking in range, e.g. Crime can be good for society because it reminds people what happens when you do something wrong, etc. At the bottom of the band, candidates are unlikely to use sociological terms and concepts accurately. Higher in the band, candidates may be beginning to use sociological terms and concepts with greater accuracy. However, some aspects of the answer may only be partially developed/explained. 3(d) Band 3 [7–8 marks] Answers in this band will show good sociological knowledge and understanding of why we have crime and deviance in society and will be well- developed and explained e.g. Functionalist, Merton, said crime happened when there was a strain between wanting success and the opportunities to achieve this. Those who cannot do so legally may turn to crime as this becomes the only way left. They can then expand on the explanation of this and other factors as necessary. Sociological terms and concepts will be used accurately overall. Answers will be well focused on the question and there will be a range of reasons presented. At the top of the band explanations will be clear throughout. 3(e) To what extent is the crime rate affected by police stereotypes? 15 Candidates should discuss the ways that the stereotypes the police hold of who commits crime affects how crime is dealt with and thus the crime rate. In evaluation, they can consider how other agents also affect the crime rate as well as arguing that police stereotypes are not affecting the crime rate. Possible answers: FOR: • police targeting – the police will target areas where they believe the crime rate is high so are more likely to catch people committing crimes there which will then affect the crime rate i.e. deprived areas; • police stop and search – evidence shows that the police are far more likely to stop and search black youths than any other social group – this then affects the crime rate; • police labels – the police have been shown to hold stereotypes of who is most likely to commit crime and so focus their efforts on these social groups rather than others – ‘typical delinquents’ (Cicourel); • white collar crime is thought to be rarely dealt with by the police meaning the higher classes get away with it and this then affects the crime rate; • some people may get fed up of being targeted by the police and so react against it in a self-fulfilling prophecy – living up to the label they have been given and committing more crime – this affects the crime rate; • the label given to people by the police can sometimes be accepted as their ‘master status’ meaning that more crime is committed and this then affects the crime rate – deviancy amplification; • the police have been accused of being ‘institutionally racist’ meaning that black people may be more likely to be perceived as criminals and thus more likely to be arrested – this affects the crime rate; • the police are said to treat women more leniently than men when it comes to crime – the chivalry thesis – so this will affect the crime rate; • other reasonable response. 3(e) AGAINST: • the police simply target and arrest those people in society who are most criminal – this is fair; • the arrest rate for females is rising, signalling the end of the chivalry thesis; • anti-racism legislation and positive discrimination means that institutional racism in the police force may be a thing of the past; • it is the courts, not the police, that determine the crime rate as they are responsible for sentencing a person; • police stereotypes of criminals are no different to the rest of society therefore maybe the media are to blame for the creation of these representations; • it is the media who are responsible for creating stereotypes of criminals through moral panics and folk devils, not the police; • media stereotypes of criminals often lead to moral panics and calls for action – the government must respond to this and often direct the police in how to behave and carry out their duties; • the crime rate is affected by other factors not just police stereotypes e.g. inadequate socialisation, material deprivation, etc.; • other reasonable response. Band 0 [0 marks] No creditworthy response. Band 1 [1–4 marks] Answers in this band may be vague and largely based on common sense showing limited knowledge of whether police stereotypes of who commits crime affect the crime rate. Use of sociological terms or concepts is very unlikely. Responses may be short, undeveloped and one-sided, e.g. The police have ideas of who to look for when a crime is committed. OR The police often don’t arrest rich people. Lower in the band (1–2 marks) expect one or two weak points. Higher in the band (3–4 marks) candidates may offer more than two points or provide a weak definition of key terms, e.g. Police are the agent responsible for controlling crime in the question. 3(e) Band 2 [5–8 marks] In this band candidates will show some basic knowledge of whether police stereotypes of who commits crime affect the crime rate. Alternatively, they may offer an answer which is list-like in nature but there will be no real attempt to assess the issues raised by the question. There may be limited/some use of sociological terms or concepts. Responses may be underdeveloped and lack range. Answers may be simplistic and two-sided responses are unlikely e.g. The police go to deprived areas to look for criminals and are more likely to arrest them, etc. Lower in the band, the response will be rather narrow in the points covered and there will be little development. Higher in the band, more points will be covered and there will be limited development of some points. Alternatively, a list-like answer with little development covering both sides of the argument may score up to 8 marks. A one-sided answer cannot score higher than 8 marks. Band 3 [9–12 marks] Answers in this band will show good sociological knowledge and understanding of whether police stereotypes of who commits crime affect the crime rate. Sociological terms and concepts will be used with greater accuracy and/or frequency. For the most part, answers will be well-developed, focused on the question and there will be a range of points presented. Candidates may say that e.g. Despite police targeting clearly being a reason why some social groups are more likely to be arrested than others, it is the courts who sentence people and so affect the crime rate. There will be a two-sided response but this may be unbalanced. At the bottom of the band, candidates may provide a narrower range of well-developed points. At the top of the band, expect a wider range of points and clear focus on the question. Band 4 [13–15 marks] Answers in this band will show excellent knowledge and understanding of whether police stereotypes of who commits crime affect the crime rate. There will be a strong grasp of the argument as well as accurate and frequent use of sociological terms and concepts. Answers will be well-developed, clearly focused on the question and discuss a wide range of points. Responses will be two-sided and balanced. At the bottom of the band (13 marks), the answer may lack a specific conclusion. Higher in the band, there will be a clear attempt to offer an assessment of the ‘To what extent«?’ part of the question through a focused conclusion. Candidates should show consideration of points for and against the idea of police stereotypes affecting the crime rate, citing some of the examples given.
4 Changes in the media are a good example of globalisation, allowing the audience choice over content and patterns of consumption. Many sociologists argue that the media is also an important agency of socialisation, affecting voting patterns and setting the agenda for what is important in society. (a) What is meant by the term ‘globalisation’? [2] (b) Describe two ways that the media can be biased. [4] (c) Explain how voting choices are influenced by the media. [6] (d) Explain why the media offer the audience more choice and control than ever before. [8] (e) To what extent do the media set the agenda for how people think and behave in society?[15]
35 marks
Mark scheme: 4(a) What is meant by the term ‘globalisation’? 2 One mark for partial definition, e.g. using the internet to find out about other countries. Two marks for clear definition, e.g. the linking of societies across the world through communication, production and culture. 4(b) Describe two ways that the media can be biased. 4 Possible answers: • through propaganda i.e. state owned media only presenting the government in a favourable light; • through censorship – this determines what the audience can and cannot consume; • through stereotypical representations of various social groups; • media gatekeepers can control what the audience are able to access and consume; • news values determine which stories make it into the news and so which are seen by the audience; • Marxists believe that the media invisibilises or dismisses ‘extreme’ viewpoints and thus maintains the status quo; • Marxists believe that the media favours the ruling class – for example it can be accused of criminalising the working class; • GUMG – managers are given more screen-time than the trade unions and are reported upon in a more favourable light; • street crime often associated with the lower classes is given more time in the media than crimes of the middle classes such as white- collar crime; • moral panics exist in the media – certain social groups are represented in an exaggerated and sensationalised way that leads to the public becoming scared of them; • certain social groups are scapegoated by the media for negative things in society whereas other groups actions are ignored; • through the opinions and beliefs of the editors and journalists; • through ownership patterns – owners may use the media to protect their own interests or to circulate their own points of view; • other reasonable response. One mark for each point correctly identified (up to maximum of two). One mark for each point that is developed (up to a maximum of two). 4(c) Explain how voting choices are influenced by the media. 6 Candidates need to show how the media can affect how people vote. They may discuss this generally, use specific examples and/or refer to relevant media effects models. Possible answers: • media i.e. newspapers are often biased and support a political party, shown through choice of language, stories and expressing opinions; • in election campaigns political parties make extensive use of the media to try and attract more voters i.e. TV political broadcasts and billboards; • election campaigns are often focused on the image of the party leader and this is constructed through the media, often highly influenced by the use of spin doctors – this affects voting choices; • The Sun newspaper in the UK claimed that it was responsible for the election of the Conservative party in 1992; • the media report on the opinion polls and these are central to determining how an individual may vote i.e. tactical voting; • propaganda and censorship – some countries use these in order to manipulate the voting patterns of the nation e.g. North Korea; • new/social media are increasingly being used by political parties to target and influence voters; • other reasonable response. Band 0 [0 marks] No creditworthy response. Band 1 [1–3 marks] Answers in this band will show only a limited awareness of how the media can affect how people vote and may talk about e.g. Some politicians are made to seem smarter than others in the media. Responses may be short and un/under developed. At the bottom of the band (1 mark) expect one weak point. Higher in the band (2–3 marks) candidates may offer more than one weak point, but there may be a tendency towards simplistic answers, engaging with sociological ideas without using sociological language. Band 2 [4–6 marks] A clear and accurate explanation, showing good sociological knowledge and understanding of how the media affects how people vote. Sociological terms and concepts should be expected e.g. Spin doctors use the media to manipulate how politicians are presented. The GUMG, for example, found that some political parties and politicians were given far more favourable coverage than others and that this then influenced how the people decided to vote. They had effectively been manipulated by the media. This would be followed by explanation of factors leading to this. At the bottom of the band, the range of points covered may be narrow or lack detail. Higher in the band, answers will cover more than one factor in a well-developed way or cover several factors in less detail. 4(d) Explain why the media offer the audience more choice and control than 8 ever before. Candidates are likely to be discussing aspects of Pluralism and/or Postmodernism in their responses. New media are likely to be the main focus of candidate’s answers. Choice and control do not need to be dealt with as separate factors. Possible answers: • pluralists argue that there are many small and independent media production companies that ensure that the audience have a good range of choice and control over the media that they consume; • the media is now global, meaning that the audience can access information and entertainment from all over the globe – the choices available have never been greater; • new media allow the audience to be interactive and thus control what they consume and how they consume it; • new media gives the audience the power to interact with and influence media content through such means as blogs, comments and forums; • citizen journalism is a commonly seen feature in news reporting today – allowing the audience the power to be able to control what news is reported upon and how it is portrayed; • many audience members are now also media producers – they upload content and have the power to be able to control the content of the media. This also increases audience choice; • satellite and cable TV means a greater range of choice for the audience with many specialist and niche programmes available; • the internet allows for a wider range of viewpoints to have a platform and an audience and thus opens up many more ideas and beliefs to the audience; • other reasonable response. Band 0 [0 marks] No creditworthy response. Band 1 [1–3 marks] Answers in this band will show only a limited awareness of how today’s media offers more choice and control to the audience. A tendency to description is likely. Responses may be short and undeveloped, e.g. There are loads of TV channels to choose from now stated without explanation. Sociological terms and concepts are unlikely to be used. At the bottom of the band (1 mark) expect one weak point. Higher in the band (2–3 marks) candidates may offer more than one weak point. 4(d) Band 2 [4–6 marks] Answers in this band will show basic sociological knowledge and understanding of how today’s media offers more choice and control to the audience. Responses may be underdeveloped and lacking in range, e.g. There is a lot of choice for the audience today because of the development of new media meaning content from all over the world can be easily and quickly accessed anywhere, anytime, etc. At the bottom of the band, candidates are unlikely to use sociological terms and concepts accurately. Higher in the band, candidates may be beginning to use sociological terms and concepts with greater accuracy. However, some aspects of the answer may only be partially developed/explained. Band 3 [7–8 marks] Answers in this band will show good sociological knowledge and understanding of how today’s media offer more choice and control to the audience and will be well-developed and explained, e.g. According to Pluralists, the audience today have a great deal of control over media content. This is largely because of the developments in new media that allow audience members to both consume and produce media content. They can therefore set their own agenda through uploads, citizen journalism and interactive blogs/forums on a global scale. This ultimately leads to more choice for the consumer. They can then expand on the explanation of this and other factors as necessary. Sociological terms and concepts will be used accurately overall. Answers will be well focused on the question and there will be a range of reasons presented. At the top of the band explanations will be clear throughout. 4(e) To what extent do the media set the agenda for how people think and 15 behave in society? SET THE AGENDA/AGENDA SETTING – the process of deciding what topics are included in the media and how they are presented to the audience. Candidates should consider the various ways that the media are able to set the agenda in society. They should then consider alternative viewpoints that challenge this idea of media power and control. New media is likely to be used for the evaluation but this is not essential. Possible answers: FOR: • the content of the media is a social construction based upon the decisions and choices of media professionals such as journalists – it therefore does not reflect reality which may affect how people think and behave; • some content makes it into the media, some does not – this idea of selection allows the media to set the agenda and so influence how people think and behave; • news values typically determine what stories and issues make the news – not everything that happens is reported upon therefore the media sets the agenda and so influences how people think and behave; • how the content of the media is presented to the audience also helps to set the agenda i.e. the angle or spin that a story or issue takes which then influences how people think and behave; • media gatekeepers decide what is important for the audience to know about and thus determine topics of conversation – setting the agenda and influencing how people think and behave; • Marxists believe that the media serve the needs of capitalism and set a capitalist agenda through the way media content supports the ruling class status quo which influences the audience; • GUMG research indicates that the way the news is presented influences how the audience think about particular issues e.g. management and workers on strike, so setting the agenda; • the scapegoating of certain social groups within the media also serves to set the agenda and diverts attention away from any ruling class wrongdoings e.g. corporate crime, so influencing the audience; • the hypodermic syringe and cultural effects models both say that the media does influence the way the audience think and behave; • other reasonable response. 4(e) AGAINST: • pluralists believe that the audience have the power to choose what they wish to consume and therefore are not subject to media agenda setting; • the uses and gratifications approach believes that the media serves audience needs rather than setting an agenda; • postmodernists believe that the media is so diverse today that there isn’t one agenda being set anymore; • new media is very difficult to control and therefore alternative and radical viewpoints can easily be disseminated; • new media allows the audience greater possibilities to control and alter the content of the media themselves – through such things as interactivity and uploading via the internet; • citizen journalism is a good example to argue that the media do not set the agenda in society – maybe the audience do instead; • it’s not the media that sets the agenda for how people think and behave but other informal agencies such as family, education, peers; • other reasonable response. Band 0 [0 marks] No creditworthy response. Band 1 [1–4 marks] Answers in this band may be vague and largely based on common sense showing limited knowledge of whether the media set the agenda for how people think and behave in society. Use of sociological terms or concepts is very unlikely. Responses may be short, undeveloped and one-sided, e.g. The media can present things in a certain way so that the audience believe what they see and read. Lower in the band (1–2 marks) expect one or two weak points. Higher in the band (3–4 marks) candidates may offer more than two points or provide a weak definition of key terms, e.g. Agenda setting means telling people what to think, in the question. Band 2 [5–8 marks] In this band candidates will show some basic knowledge of whether the media set the agenda for how people think and behave in society. Alternatively, they may offer an answer which is list-like in nature but there will be no real attempt to assess the issues raised by the question. There may be limited/some use of sociological terms or concepts. Responses may be underdeveloped and lack range. Answers may be simplistic and two-sided responses are unlikely e.g. The media is controlled by powerful people who support the ruling class so this viewpoint comes through in the media and the audience are influenced by it to think and act in a particular way, etc. Lower in the band, the response will be rather narrow in the points covered and there will be little development. Higher in the band, more points will be covered and there will be limited development of some points. Alternatively, a list-like answer with little development covering both sides of the argument may score up to 8 marks. A one-sided answer cannot score higher than 8 marks. 4(e) Band 3 [9–12 marks] Answers in this band will show good sociological knowledge and understanding of whether the media set the agenda for how people think and behave in society. Sociological terms and concepts will be used with greater accuracy and/or frequency. For the most part, answers will be well- developed, focused on the question and there will be a range of points presented. Candidates may say that e.g. Despite Marxists claiming that the media do determine what is covered in the media through, for example, prevalent news values, Pluralists believe that the audience have the power to select for themselves what they consume and so the ability to avoid any agenda setting. With the advent of new media this has increasingly become the case as the audience are now active media producers as well as consumers meaning that they could be said to set the agenda as much as the media do. There will be a two-sided response but this may be unbalanced. At the bottom of the band, candidates may provide a narrower range of well-developed points. At the top of the band, expect a wider range of points and clear focus on the question. Band 4 [13–15 marks] Answers in this band will show excellent knowledge and understanding of whether the media set the agenda for how people think and behave in society. There will be a strong grasp of the argument as well as accurate and frequent use of sociological terms and concepts. Answers will be well-developed, clearly focused on the question and discuss a wide range of points. Responses will be two-sided and balanced. At the bottom of the band (13 marks) the answer may lack a specific conclusion. Higher in the band, there will be a clear attempt to offer an assessment of the ‘To what extent«?’ part of the question through a focused conclusion. Candidates should show consideration of points for and against the idea of media agenda setting influencing audience thoughts and actions, citing some of the examples given.
2 In modern industrial societies many different types of schools exist, for example private schools. All types of schools function to help students pass exams as well as prepare them for the world of work. For this reason, schools are an important agency of socialisation. (a) What is meant by the term ‘private school’. [2] (b) Describe two types of schools, apart from private schools. [4] (c) Explain how a school’s use of IQ tests could affect a child’s experience of education. [6] (d) Explain why some students may reject the norms and values of a school. [8] (e) To what extent is the functionalist view of education correct? [15] Section C: Crime, deviance and social control
35 marks
Mark scheme: 2(a) What is meant by the term ‘private school’? One mark for partial definition, e.g. ‘a school you pay for’. Two marks for clear definition, e.g. ‘a school that is not run or controlled by the Government and is funded through tuition fees’. 2 2(b) Describe two types of schools, apart from private schools. Possible answers: • primary/elementary – where children receive the first years of their education; • pre-school – education received before starting primary school largely looking to develop children’s cognitive and social skills; • secondary/high school – a range of different subjects are studied and examined; • state schools – run directly or indirectly by the government; • faith schools – controlled by a religious organisation; • comprehensive schools – non-selective secondary schools; • grammar schools – secondary education focused on academic excellence; • academies – businesses and other sponsors decide how the school is run; • free schools – charities/parents and other groups can set up their own school directly funded by the government; • vocational schools/training schools – students learn practical subjects and/or skills that will prepare them for the workforce; • other reasonable response. One mark for each point correctly identified (up to maximum of two). One mark for each point that is developed (up to a maximum of two). 4 Question Answer Marks 2(c) Explain how a school’s use of IQ tests could affect a child’s experience of education. Possible answers: • pupils who get high IQ scores in a test are categorised as intelligent, those that don’t are seen as not as intelligent by teachers; • IQ test results can determine the set or stream a pupil gets placed into; • IQ tests will determine which students a pupil spends their time with and thus affects peer group relationships; • students in a lower set may be negatively labelled by teachers and face a self-fulfilling prophecy; • students in higher sets may be positively labelled and face the halo effect; • numbers and level of examination entry may be determined by IQ test results; • results of IQ tests may indirectly lead to the formation of pro or anti-school subcultures dependent on the scores achieved; • IQ test results may determine which subjects a pupil can/cannot study whilst in education; • IQ tests have been accused by some of being ethnocentric and so can be used by schools as a form of institutional racism; • IQ tests have been criticised for favouring middle class students therefore may serve to reinforce (according to Marxists) working class feelings of failure and higher class superiority; • other reasonable response. Band 0 [0 marks] No creditworthy response. Band 1 [1–3 marks] Answers in this band will show only a limited awareness of how IQ tests can affect a student’s experience of education and may talk about e.g. ‘getting bad results means you go in the lower sets’. Responses may be short and un/under developed. At the bottom of the band (1 mark), expect one weak point. Higher in the band (2–3 marks), candidates may offer more than one weak point, but there may be a tendency towards simplistic answers, engaging with sociological ideas without using sociological language. 6 Question Answer Marks 2(c) Band 2 [4–6 marks] A clear and accurate explanation, showing good sociological knowledge and understanding of how IQ tests can affect a student’s experience of education. Sociological terms and concepts should be expected e.g. ‘IQ tests essentially filter students into bright and not bright streams and this may result in teacher labelling. If a student is given a negative teacher label as a result of their IQ test this could lead to a self-fulfilling prophecy and under achievement in school’. This would be followed by an explanation of factors leading to this. At the bottom of the band, the range of points covered may be narrow or lack detail. Higher in the band, answers will cover more than one factor in a well-developed way or cover several factors in less detail. Question Answer Marks 2(d) Explain why some students may reject the norms and values of a school. Possible answers: • schools divide students into achievers and failures through the testing and setting system and this causes some pupils to become disillusioned and thus to rebel; • functionalist view – part of the wider teenage rejection of authority, testing the boundaries within the transition stage; • status frustration – those who are labelled as failures by the school do not gain status from academic achievement and therefore reject school’s norms and values in order to get this through deviance; • some pupils form an anti-school sub-culture whereby they reject the values of school and create their own hierarchy and opportunities to gain status and respect – often linked to social characteristics of class, gender and/or ethnicity; • school and education is perceived to be feminine, boys are under pressure to assert their masculinity and so reject the school’s norms and values as a way of doing this; • some students have not been socialised into a culture that values education and so are unlikely to conform to the rules it imposes; • some students do not follow the norms and values of a school in order to resist the institution that they believe has failed them and not given them the opportunities to succeed; • for some students an academic education is not accessible or appropriate and there may be no vocational alternatives, therefore they rebel against the school ethos and values; • other reasonable response. Band 0 [0 marks] No creditworthy response. Band 1 [1–3 marks] Answers in this band will show only a limited awareness of why some students may reject the norms and values of a school. A tendency to description is likely. Responses may be short and undeveloped, e.g. ‘they rebel because they find school hard’, stated without explanation. Sociological terms and concepts are unlikely to be used. At the bottom of the band (1 mark), expect one weak point. Higher in the band (2–3 marks), candidates may offer more than one weak point. 8 Question Answer Marks 2(d) Band 2 [4–6 marks] Answers in this band will show basic sociological knowledge and understanding of why some students may reject the norms and values of a school. Responses may be underdeveloped and lacking in range, e.g. ‘schools set pupils based on ability and those in the bottom sets are often looked down on by teachers. This means they see no point to education and so rebel against it instead’. At the bottom of the band, candidates are unlikely to use sociological terms and concepts accurately. Higher in the band, candidates may be beginning to use sociological terms and concepts with greater accuracy. However, some aspects of the answer may only be partially developed/explained. Band 3 [7–8 marks] Answers in this band will show good sociological knowledge and understanding of why some students may reject the norms and values of a school and will be well developed and explained, e.g. ‘students in school who choose not to follow the norms and values are typically male and working class. They are labelled by the teachers as failures and therefore see little point in trying hard, often living up to their self-fulfilling prophecy as they turn to their peer group for status’. They can then expand on the explanation of this and other factors as necessary. Sociological terms and concepts will be used accurately overall. Answers will be well focused on the question and there will be a range of reasons presented. At the top of the band explanations will be clear throughout. Question Answer Marks 2(e) To what extent is the functionalist view of education correct? Possible answers: FOR: • education contributes to the smooth running of society and therefore helps to maintain social order; • schools transmit norms and values to individuals and continue the socialisation that has begun in the family; • schools act as an agency of social control, using sanctions and rewards to reinforce right and wrong and to ensure conformity in pupils; • children are socialised into a shared set of values and therefore they feel a sense of belonging through shared interests and beliefs; • education can promote key values such as patriotism through history and literature lessons, the learning and singing of the national anthem and prominence of national symbols; • education teaches children the importance of achievement, it encourages them to work hard and to set goals, everyone is judged in the same way, it is meritocratic; • education produces individuals with the skills and knowledge necessary to promote economic growth and stability; • role allocation – education ensures the most talented and able children go into the top jobs – examination results ensure that individuals take different career paths suited to their needs and abilities – ‘sifting and sorting’; • functionalists believe that educational success leads to social mobility and greater life chances; • other reasonable response. 15 Question Answer Marks 2(e) AGAINST: • many sociologists believe that there isn’t a shared set of values in society to be passed on through education anymore because of the diverse and multicultural society we live in; • Marxists believe education passes on the dominant ideology and therefore ensures that the status quo is maintained in society; • feminists believe that patriarchal values are transmitted through education in, for example, the perpetuation of traditional and stereotypical gender roles; • some sociologists believe that education is ethnocentric and presents a very narrow view of the world which alienates ethnic minority students; • education is a tool used by the ruling class, according to Marxists, to legitimise and normalise capitalism – competition is promoted in readiness for society and students are indoctrinated into capitalist ideologies; • Marxists believe there is a hidden curriculum in education that serves to promote dominant norms and values that benefit those in positions of power in society e.g. students are trained in dealing with boredom to prepare them for their routine, dull jobs in later life; • education can be unfair – those that pay for an education through private schooling, for example, are likely to gain better examination results than those that attend state schools leading to better jobs in society – this is not meritocratic; • feminists believe there is still gendered subject choice in schools and that this limits the power and status women can have in the labour market in society; • girls are socialised into nurturing and caring roles through education whereas boys are taught to be independent and aggressive – feminism; • functionalist view may be correct for some individuals but may not be the case for everybody – it perhaps depends upon the school itself, the subject choices, the individuals and the type of school; • other reasonable response. Question Answer Marks 2(e) Band 0 [0 marks] No creditworthy response. Band 1 [1–4 marks] Answers in this band may be vague and largely based on common sense showing limited knowledge of the extent to which the functionalist view of education is correct. Use of sociological terms or concepts is very unlikely. Responses may be short, undeveloped and one-sided, e.g. ‘education gives everyone the chance to be successful’. Lower in the band (1–2 marks), expect one or two weak points. Higher in the band (3–4 marks) candidates may offer more than two points or provide a weak definition of key terms, e.g. ‘functionalists say that education is a good thing for everybody’. Band 2 [5–8 marks] In this band candidates will show some basic knowledge of the extent to which the functionalist view of education is correct. Alternatively, they may offer an answer which is list-like in nature but there will be no real attempt to assess the issues raised by the question. There may be limited/some use of sociological terms or concepts. Responses may be underdeveloped and lack range. Answers may be simplistic and two-sided responses are unlikely e.g. ‘education is a key agency of socialisation that teaches norms and values to children and encourages everyone to behave correctly’. Lower in the band, the response will be rather narrow in the points covered and there will be little development. Higher in the band, more points will be covered and there will be limited development of some points. Alternatively, a list-like answer with little development covering both sides of the argument may score up to 8 marks. A one-sided answer cannot score higher than 8 marks. Band 3 [9–12 marks] Answers in this band will show good sociological knowledge and understanding of the extent to which the functionalist view of education is correct. Sociological terms and concepts will be used with greater accuracy and/or frequency. For the most part, answers will be well developed, focused on the question and there will be a range of points presented. Candidates may say that e.g. ‘despite there being many positive factors to education, like gaining skills and knowledge, Marxists believe that it serves the interests of the ruling class and indoctrinates students into capitalist norms and values that ensure the working class remain in their low status positions in society’. There will be a two- sided response but this may be unbalanced. At the bottom of the band, candidates may provide a narrower range of well-developed points. At the top of the band, expect a wider range of points and clear focus on the question. Question Answer Marks 2(e) Band 4 [13–15 marks] Answers in this band will show excellent knowledge and understanding of the extent to which the functionalist view of education is correct. There will be a strong grasp of the argument as well as accurate and frequent use of sociological terms and concepts. Answers will be well developed, clearly focused on the question and discuss a wide range of points. Responses will be two-sided and balanced. At the bottom of the band (13 marks), the answer may lack a specific conclusion. Higher in the band, there will be a clear attempt to offer an assessment of the ‘To what extent«?’ part of the question through a focused conclusion. Candidates should show consideration of points for and against the idea of the functionalist view of education being correct, citing some of the examples given.
2 Different social groups vary in their educational achievement. Whilst there are policies and initiatives to promote equality and social mobility, they do not help everybody. For some, education does not improve a person's life chances. (a) What is meant by the term ‘social mobility’? [2] (b) Describe two ways that schools socially control pupils. [4] (c) Explain how positive discrimination can improve the educational achievement of some social groups. [6] (d) Explain why education is necessary in modern industrial societies. [8] (e) To what extent do social factors, such as gender, determine an individual’s educational achievement? [15] Section C: Crime, deviance and social control There are different ways that sociologists can measure crime, for example self-report studies. However using these measurements to explain why people commit crime causes much debate. Some sociologists argue that crime is committed because people experience a lack of status in society, other sociologists blame the police and the way they behave.
35 marks
Mark scheme: 2(a) What is meant by the term ‘social mobility’? One mark for partial definition, e.g. ‘getting more status’. Two marks for clear definition, e.g. ‘the movement of individuals or groups up or down the social hierarchy’. 2 2(b) Describe two ways that schools socially control pupils. Possible answers: • Through formal social control – exclusions and school rules; • Through informal social control – warnings; • Through negative sanctions such as detentions – fear of punishment; • Through deterrence – punishment puts children off from misbehaving again; • Through encouraging conformity – children like to fit in; • Through positive sanctions such as stickers and praise – this encourages children to continue behaving in the ‘right’ way; • Through the hidden curriculum – Marxist ideas of ideological control; • Through the patriarchal curriculum – feminist ideas of male control; • Through positive or negative peer pressure – anti-school or pro-school sub-cultures; • Through secondary socialisation processes – teachers teaching the expected norms and values for later life; • Other reasonable response. One mark for each point correctly identified (up to maximum of two). One mark for each point that is developed (up to a maximum of two). 4 Question Answer Marks 2(c) Explain how positive discrimination can improve the educational achievement of some social groups. Possible answers: • Some schools have introduced schemes to encourage girls to aim higher, especially in science and technology subjects (STEM policies, GIST, WISE, etc.). Girls may be given preferential access to lab equipment, for example; • Single-sex classes within co-educational schools – thought to improve the performance of both males and females; • Lessons geared towards boys’ ways of learning (active learning) have been introduced in many schools to enable boys to fulfil their academic potential; • Ethnic minority pupils may be given small group/individual/additional lessons in English as an additional or secondary language to boost educational achievement; • Some universities and private schools are now setting quotas that ensure they admit pupils from disadvantaged backgrounds – often with lower results than the average; • Financial bursaries, scholarships, policies that give financial aid/resources to students and incentives are often available to benefit and support those from socioeconomically deprived and/or ethnic minority backgrounds; • Extra-curricular, additional and holiday lessons/summer schools are run by many schools for less privileged social groups to attend; • Educational priority zones/ZEPs can receive better funding and additional resources to improve educational achievement of deprived individuals; • Other reasonable response. Band 0 [0 marks] No creditworthy response. Band 1 [1–3 marks] Answers in this band will show only a limited awareness of the concept of positive discrimination and its influence on educational achievement and may talk about e.g. ‘helping poorer students do better’. Responses may be short and un/under developed. At the bottom of the band (1 mark), expect one weak point. Higher in the band (2–3 marks), candidates may offer more than one weak point, but there may be a tendency towards simplistic answers, engaging with sociological ideas without using sociological language. Band 2 [4–6 marks] A clear and accurate explanation, showing good sociological knowledge and understanding of the relationship between positive discrimination and improved educational achievement. Sociological terms and concepts should be expected e.g. ‘Many schools have introduced STEM initiatives and clubs to better engage females in science and technology subjects. They have been given privileged access to equipment and offered mentors and visits to improve their motivation and performance.’ This would be followed by explanation of factors leading to this. At the bottom of the band, the range of points covered may be narrow or lack detail. Higher in the band, answers will cover more than one factor in a well-developed way or cover several factors in less detail. 6 Question Answer Marks 2(d) Explain why education is necessary in modern industrial societies. Possible answers: • Hidden curriculum – to learn and accept society’s culture; • Socialisation – learning and reinforcing of norms and values; • Social control – to ensure that individual’s know their place in society and/or conform; • Knowledge – to learn and to understand further; • To gain qualifications which will allow for further study and access to a career of choice; • Learning of national identity through such things as the singing of the national anthem, culture and history, shared values, etc.; • To provide the skills and abilities to ensure that society and the economy functions well in a modern, technological society; • Marxists believe education exists to indoctrinate individuals into accepting capitalism and its inequalities as normal and fair; • Feminists believe that education reinforces and teaches patriarchal values and makes distinctions between the expectations of males and females; • Education is meritocratic according to functionalists and therefore exists as a means of social mobility; • Functionalism – role allocation – getting the right people into the right positions, allowing society to function smoothly; • Other reasonable response. Band 0 [0 marks] No creditworthy response. Band 1 [1–3 marks] Answers in this band will show only a limited awareness of why education is necessary in modern industrial societies. A tendency to description is likely. Responses may be short and undeveloped, e.g. ‘so we know about important things’ stated without explanation. Sociological terms and concepts are unlikely to be used. At the bottom of the band (1 mark), expect one weak point. Higher in the band (2–3 marks), candidates may offer more than one weak point. Band 2 [4–6 marks] Answers in this band will show basic sociological knowledge and understanding of why education is necessary in modern industrial societies. Responses may be underdeveloped and lacking in range, e.g. ‘Education is a crucial part of the socialisation process and reinforces norms, values and gender roles in individuals’. At the bottom of the band, candidates are unlikely to use sociological terms and concepts accurately. Higher in the band, candidates may be beginning to use sociological terms and concepts with greater accuracy. However, some aspects of the answer may only be partially developed/explained. 8 Question Answer Marks 2(d) Band 3 [7–8 marks] Answers in this band will show good sociological knowledge and understanding of why education is necessary in modern industrial societies and will be well developed and explained, e.g. ‘Different sociological theories believe there are different reasons as to why education is important. Functionalists see it as a positive institution where social mobility possibilities are created whereas Marxists see it as an agency where capitalist inequalities are reproduced’. They can then expand on the explanation of this and other factors as necessary. Sociological terms and concepts will be used accurately overall. Answers will be well focused on the question and there will be a range of reasons presented. At the top of the band explanations will be clear throughout. Question Answer Marks 2(e) To what extent do social factors, such as gender, determine an individual’s educational achievement? Possible answers: FOR: • Gender – in some developing countries and in some cultures boys may be more likely to attend school than girls and so achieve better; • In most industrial societies girls perform better than boys in their examinations – the culture of masculinity and pressure to be a ‘lad’ may be a reason to explain this; • Boys are more likely to join an anti-school subculture than girls which may negatively affect their achievement; • Negative peer pressure is thought to affect boys more than girls and the fear of informal sanctions from their peers discourages boys from studying and working hard; • More positive role models in education for girls may be one of the reasons for their improved performance; • Positive discrimination policies regarding gender e.g. girls into STEM can affect achievement; • Pupils from ethnic minorities tend to do less well in education – cultural factors such as language barriers may be one reason for this; • Prejudice, discrimination and racism may explain why some ethnic minorities do not do well in education; • The ethnocentric curriculum may be a factor to explain why ethnic minorities do not do well in education; • Some ethnic groups e.g. Chinese, do well in education due to parental expectations and the value placed on educational success; • Higher class students are more likely to attend private schools and so are more likely to do well in education; • Bourdieu – lack of capital (e.g. cultural) may be a reason to explain different attainment levels by students from different social classes; • Material deprivation is more likely to be relevant for those in the lower social classes and may affect how well an individual does in education; • Immediate gratification may be a cultural norm for the lower social classes, whereas deferred gratification is linked with those from the higher social groups; • Teacher labelling (either positive or negative) regarding gender/class/ethnicity may lead to a self-fulfilling prophecy and thus affect educational achievement; • Other reasonable response. 15 Question Answer Marks 2(e) AGAINST: • Nothing to do with social factors but with genetic differences in intelligence; • This approach is too deterministic – every individual is different, you cannot generalise about all members of a social group being the same in terms of educational achievement; • Functionalism – educational success depends upon how hard you work and the efforts you make; • Education today is based on equal opportunities (functionalism and meritocracy) therefore social factors are no longer relevant; • Educational success is not determined by your social group but by school factors e.g. culture of learning/setting/teacher labelling/curriculum options/fee paying schools, etc.; • Educational success is not determined by your social group but by the value placed upon education in the home and how much parental encouragement a child receives; • Educational success is closely linked to location (this could be on a global, national or local scale) and funding not on social factors; • Educational success is determined by the teacher and the school structures and expectations, not on social factors; • Peer group factors – it is the peer group that the student associates with that determines educational achievement, not social factors; • Positive discrimination and equal rights legislation means that previous barriers faced by some social groups in education are no longer relevant; • Other reasonable response. Band 0 [0 marks] No creditworthy response. Band 1 [1–4 marks] Answers in this band may be vague and largely based on common sense showing limited knowledge of the extent to which social factors determine educational success. Use of sociological terms or concepts is very unlikely. Responses may be short, undeveloped and one-sided, e.g. ‘Girls do better than boys because they work harder’ or ‘Poor people don’t do as well as rich people’. Lower in the band (1–2 marks), expect one or two weak points. Higher in the band (3–4 marks) candidates may offer more than two points and provide a weak definition of key terms, e.g. ‘educational success is how well a person does in education’, in the question. Question Answer Marks 2(e) Band 2 [5–8 marks] In this band candidates will show some basic knowledge of the extent to which social factors determine educational success. Alternatively, they may offer an answer which is list-like in nature but there will be no real attempt to assess the issues raised by the question. There may be limited/some use of sociological terms or concepts. Responses may be underdeveloped and lack range. Answers may be simplistic and two-sided responses are unlikely e.g. ‘Some social groups do much better in education than others. Ethnic minorities may face racism in schools and so they don’t do very well’. Lower in the band, the response will be rather narrow in the points covered and there will be little development. Higher in the band, more points will be covered and there will be limited development of some points. Alternatively, a list-like answer with little development covering both sides of the argument may score up to 8 marks. A one-sided answer cannot score higher than 8 marks. Band 3 [9–12 marks] Answers in this band will show good sociological knowledge and understanding of the extent to which social factors determine educational success. Sociological terms and concepts will be used with greater accuracy and/or frequency. For the most part, answers will be well developed, focused on the question and there will be a range of points presented. Candidates may say that e.g. ‘despite more equal opportunity legislation in education, some social groups still do better than others. In many countries, for example, boys are more valued than girls and so are more likely to go to school and study. Girls fall behind and so do not achieve as well. Feminists would link this to patriarchy.’ There will be a two-sided response but this may be unbalanced. At the bottom of the band, candidates may provide a narrower range of well-developed points. At the top of the band, expect a wider range of points and clear focus on the question. Band 4 [13–15 marks] Answers in this band will show excellent knowledge and understanding of the extent to which social factors determine educational success. There will be a strong grasp of the argument as well as accurate and frequent use of sociological terms and concepts. Answers will be well developed, clearly focused on the question and discuss a wide range of points. Responses will be two-sided and balanced. At the bottom of the band (13 marks), the answer may lack a specific conclusion. Higher in the band, there will be a clear attempt to offer an assessment of the ‘To what extent«?’ part of the question through a focused conclusion. Candidates should show consideration of points for and against the idea of social factors determining educational success, citing some of the examples given.
3 (a) What is meant by the term ‘self-report studies’? [2] (b) Describe two examples of how crime and deviance are relative. [4] (c) Explain how the police enforce the law. [6] (d) Explain why informal methods of social control may deter people from committing crime. [8] (e) To what extent can crime be explained by an individual’s lack of status in society? [15] Section D: Media The media is a secondary agent of socialisation and an agent of social control. Gate-keeping and the roles of owners, editors and journalists are all issues that sociologists such as Marxists consider. Sociologists are also interested in the difference between traditional and new media.
35 marks
Mark scheme: 3(a) What is meant by the term ‘self-report studies’? One mark for partial definition, e.g. ‘you tell someone about crime’. Two marks for clear definition, e.g. ‘a research method that asks people what crimes or deviant acts they have committed’. 2 3(b) Describe two examples of how crime and deviance are relative. Possible answers: • Role based explanations, e.g. it is ok to kill as a soldier in wartime but that same individual is not allowed to kill when not in the soldier role; • Cultural/societal explanations, e.g. in Rastafarianism it is acceptable to smoke marijuana whereas in many cultures this is an illegal act; • Situational deviance, e.g. it is acceptable to be naked in the shower but not in a public place; • Social factors, e.g. age of the offender – something that is considered as criminal for an adult may not be seen as such for a child; • Time/era – definitions of crime and deviance change over time, e.g. smoking used to be widespread, in many countries today it has now been banned from public places; • Interactionism – one person’s definition of what is criminal/deviant may not be the same as someone else’s; • Public and private deviance – what is ok in private is often not ok in public where it would be considered criminal or deviant; • Other reasonable response. One mark for each point correctly identified (up to maximum of two). One mark for each point that is developed (up to a maximum of two). 4 Question Answer Marks 3(c) Explain how the police enforce the law. Possible answers: • The power of arrest is a formal method of control that the police can use to ensure the law is adhered to; • Police are able to use physical restraint or force in order to ensure the law is followed; • The sight of a police officer on the street often acts as a deterrent to criminals and thus prevents crimes from being committed; • Police may target certain individuals, areas or social groups (often due to media labelling) in order to reduce crime – this could be through a large police presence on the streets; • Zero tolerance campaigns can be used by the police in order to send out the message that they are getting tough on crime; • Community policing can be used whereby the public are encouraged to support the police and integrate them into the community to increase social cohesion and conformity; • Military policing – weapons/force can be used to enforce the law and to deter individuals from crime; • Police surveillance – can be through technology e.g. cameras or through police officers themselves; • Stop and search – this can help to both deter individuals from crime as well as detect crimes; • Other reasonable response. Band 0 [0 marks] No creditworthy response. Band 1 [1–3 marks] Answers in this band will show only a limited awareness of how the police enforce the law and may talk about, e.g. ‘they arrest bad people’. Responses may be short and un/under developed. At the bottom of the band (1 mark), expect one weak point. Higher in the band (2–3 marks), candidates may offer more than one weak point, but there may be a tendency towards simplistic answers, engaging with sociological ideas without using sociological language. Band 2 [4–6 marks] A clear and accurate explanation, showing good sociological knowledge and understanding of how the police enforce the law. Sociological terms and concepts should be expected, e.g. ‘Police targeting is frequently used to try and reduce crimes in particular areas or by particular social groups such as targeting inner city areas for gang crime’. This would be followed by explanation of factors leading to this. At the bottom of the band, the range of points covered may be narrow or lack detail. Higher in the band, answers will cover more than one factor in a well-developed way or cover several factors in less detail. 6 Question Answer Marks 3(d) Explain why informal methods of social control may deter people from committing crime. Possible answers: • Informal agents of social control typically have a closer relationship to people than formal agents therefore people conform to social expectations and don’t commit crime as they don’t want to let people down; • The family deters people from committing crime through positive role modelling that family members can imitate; • Education deters people from committing crime through the hidden curriculum that teaches the importance of conformity and reinforces commonly accepted norms and values e.g. following the law; • The media shows the negative consequences of committing crime e.g. the harshness of prison life; • The media often turns criminality into a moral panic e.g. drug taking, and criminals into folk devils which deters others from committing crime; • The peer group may encourage conformity through positive peer pressure and ostracise/exclude those who do not conform and commit deviance instead; • The workplace deters people from committing crime through the fear/threat of dismissal or other sanctions; • All of the informal agencies of social control can use negative sanctions to put people off committing crime; • All of the informal agencies of social control can use positive sanctions to encourage people to conform and to avoid a criminal lifestyle; • Other reasonable response. Band 0 [0 marks] No creditworthy response. Band 1 [1–3 marks] Answers in this band will show only a limited awareness of why informal methods of social control may deter people from committing crime. A tendency to description is likely. Responses may be short and undeveloped, e.g. ‘people don’t want to lose their job’ stated without explanation. Sociological terms and concepts are unlikely to be used. At the bottom of the band (1 mark), expect one weak point. Higher in the band (2–3 marks), candidates may offer more than one weak point. 8 Question Answer Marks 3(d) Band 2 [4–6 marks] Answers in this band will show basic sociological knowledge and understanding of why informal methods of social control may deter people from committing crime. Responses may be underdeveloped and lacking in range, e.g. ‘The family teaches children that crime is bad and so children don’t do it as they don’t want to be sanctioned’. At the bottom of the band, candidates are unlikely to use sociological terms and concepts accurately. Higher in the band, candidates may be beginning to use sociological terms and concepts with greater accuracy. However, some aspects of the answer may only be partially developed/explained. Band 3 [7–8 marks] Answers in this band will show good sociological knowledge and understanding of why informal methods of social control may deter people from committing crime and will be well developed and explained, e.g. ‘Informal methods of social control all socialise people to believe that crime is wrong, The media, for example, shows the negative consequences of criminality and often turns criminals into folk devils through sensationalised reporting and moral panics. Similarly, both the formal and the hidden curriculum in education teach that crime is a bad thing and give out negative sanctions if it is committed. Positive sanctions on the other hand are given when people conform to society’s non-criminal norms and values’. They can then expand on the explanation of this and other factors as necessary. Sociological terms and concepts will be used accurately overall. Answers will be well focused on the question and there will be a range of reasons presented. At the top of the band explanations will be clear throughout. Question Answer Marks 3(e) To what extent can crime be explained by an individual’s lack of status in society? Possible answers: FOR: • Cohen – status frustration – a lack of educational success can lead to crime for many working class youths; • Gang crime – lack of status in society is a reason for many young people to join gangs and to commit crimes to ‘prove themselves’; • Women may commit crime e.g. white collar crime due to a lack of status in the business world; • Men may commit crime as a way to prove their masculinity and gain status in a society that increasingly sees women gaining power and status; • Ethnic minorities may suffer from racism, prejudice and discrimination in society and so turn to crime as a way to increase their status; • Merton’s ‘strain theory’ suggests that not everyone can be successful in society and so those with lower status are more likely to turn to crime; • Sexual crimes maybe committed as a form of power and control in order for the perpetrator to increase their status; • Young people suffer from a lack of status in society and so may turn to crime as a way to gain this; • Terrorism may be interpreted by some as a way of gaining status for a belief/religion/ideology in society; • Other reasonable response. AGAINST: • Lack of status may be a useful explanation for many youth crimes but not for adult crime; • Expressive crimes cannot be adequately explained by lack of status; • Middle class crimes e.g. white collar/fraud cannot be explained by a lack of status; • Upper class, corporate and green crimes have little to do with a lack of status in society; • Youth crime may be more about resistance and rebellion than a lack of status; • Crime may be committed due to material/relative deprivation, not a lack of status; • Interactionists believe crime is caused due to the labelling of individuals/police targeting, not a lack of status; • The New Right believe crime is committed because of a lack of adequate socialisation leading to moral decline in the form of an underclass; • A lack of status may be one explanation for crime but it does not fit every crime or criminal; • Other reasonable response. 15 Question Answer Marks 3(e) Band 0 [0 marks] No creditworthy response. Band 1 [1–4 marks] Answers in this band may be vague and largely based on common sense showing limited knowledge of the extent to which crimes can be explained by an individual’s lack of status. Use of sociological terms or concepts is very unlikely. Responses may be short, undeveloped and one-sided, e.g. ‘Gang members beat people up to get status’ or ‘People with little status in society may commit crime to get it’. Lower in the band (1–2 marks), expect one or two weak points. Higher in the band (3–4 marks) candidates may offer more than two points and provide a weak definition of key terms, e.g. ‘status is a person’s social standing in society’, in the question. Band 2 [5–8 marks] In this band candidates will show some basic knowledge of the extent to which crimes can be explained by an individual’s lack of status. Alternatively, they may offer an answer which is list-like in nature but there will be no real attempt to assess the issues raised by the question. There may be limited/some use of sociological terms or concepts. Responses may be underdeveloped and lack range. Answers may be simplistic and two-sided responses are unlikely e.g. ‘People who don’t do very well in education will find it hard to get status in society so might turn to crime’. Lower in the band, the response will be rather narrow in the points covered and there will be little development. Higher in the band, more points will be covered and there will be limited development of some points. Alternatively, a list-like answer with little development covering both sides of the argument may score up to 8 marks. A one-sided answer cannot score higher than 8 marks. Band 3 [9–12 marks] Answers in this band will show good sociological knowledge and understanding of the extent to which crimes can be explained by an individual’s lack of status. Sociological terms and concepts will be used with greater accuracy and/or frequency. For the most part, answers will be well developed, focused on the question and there will be a range of points presented. Candidates may say that e.g. ‘despite Cohen showing that status frustration was a major reason for much crime, this cannot explain the crimes committed by the higher classes who already have considerable power in society’. There will be a two-sided response but this may be unbalanced. At the bottom of the band, candidates may provide a narrower range of well developed points. At the top of the band, expect a wider range of points and clear focus on the question. Question Answer Marks 3(e) Band 4 [13–15 marks] Answers in this band will show excellent knowledge and understanding of the extent to which crimes can be explained by an individual’s lack of status. There will be a strong grasp of the argument as well as accurate and frequent use of sociological terms and concepts. Answers will be well developed, clearly focused on the question and discuss a wide range of points. Responses will be two-sided and balanced. At the bottom of the band (13 marks), the answer may lack a specific conclusion. Higher in the band, there will be a clear attempt to offer an assessment of the ‘To what extent«?’ part of the question through a focused conclusion. Candidates should show consideration of points for and against the idea of lack of status being an explanation for crime, citing some of the examples given.
2 In modern industrial societies many different types of schools exist, for example private schools. All types of schools function to help students pass exams as well as prepare them for the world of work. For this reason, schools are an important agency of socialisation. (a) What is meant by the term ‘private school’. [2] (b) Describe two types of schools, apart from private schools. [4] (c) Explain how a school’s use of IQ tests could affect a child’s experience of education. [6] (d) Explain why some students may reject the norms and values of a school. [8] (e) To what extent is the functionalist view of education correct? [15] Section C: Crime, deviance and social control
35 marks
Mark scheme: 2(a) What is meant by the term ‘private school’? One mark for partial definition, e.g. ‘a school you pay for’. Two marks for clear definition, e.g. ‘a school that is not run or controlled by the Government and is funded through tuition fees’. 2 2(b) Describe two types of schools, apart from private schools. Possible answers: • primary/elementary – where children receive the first years of their education; • pre-school – education received before starting primary school largely looking to develop children’s cognitive and social skills; • secondary/high school – a range of different subjects are studied and examined; • state schools – run directly or indirectly by the government; • faith schools – controlled by a religious organisation; • comprehensive schools – non-selective secondary schools; • grammar schools – secondary education focused on academic excellence; • academies – businesses and other sponsors decide how the school is run; • free schools – charities/parents and other groups can set up their own school directly funded by the government; • vocational schools/training schools – students learn practical subjects and/or skills that will prepare them for the workforce; • other reasonable response. One mark for each point correctly identified (up to maximum of two). One mark for each point that is developed (up to a maximum of two). 4 Question Answer Marks 2(c) Explain how a school’s use of IQ tests could affect a child’s experience of education. Possible answers: • pupils who get high IQ scores in a test are categorised as intelligent, those that don’t are seen as not as intelligent by teachers; • IQ test results can determine the set or stream a pupil gets placed into; • IQ tests will determine which students a pupil spends their time with and thus affects peer group relationships; • students in a lower set may be negatively labelled by teachers and face a self-fulfilling prophecy; • students in higher sets may be positively labelled and face the halo effect; • numbers and level of examination entry may be determined by IQ test results; • results of IQ tests may indirectly lead to the formation of pro or anti-school subcultures dependent on the scores achieved; • IQ test results may determine which subjects a pupil can/cannot study whilst in education; • IQ tests have been accused by some of being ethnocentric and so can be used by schools as a form of institutional racism; • IQ tests have been criticised for favouring middle class students therefore may serve to reinforce (according to Marxists) working class feelings of failure and higher class superiority; • other reasonable response. Band 0 [0 marks] No creditworthy response. Band 1 [1–3 marks] Answers in this band will show only a limited awareness of how IQ tests can affect a student’s experience of education and may talk about e.g. ‘getting bad results means you go in the lower sets’. Responses may be short and un/under developed. At the bottom of the band (1 mark), expect one weak point. Higher in the band (2–3 marks), candidates may offer more than one weak point, but there may be a tendency towards simplistic answers, engaging with sociological ideas without using sociological language. 6 Question Answer Marks 2(c) Band 2 [4–6 marks] A clear and accurate explanation, showing good sociological knowledge and understanding of how IQ tests can affect a student’s experience of education. Sociological terms and concepts should be expected e.g. ‘IQ tests essentially filter students into bright and not bright streams and this may result in teacher labelling. If a student is given a negative teacher label as a result of their IQ test this could lead to a self-fulfilling prophecy and under achievement in school’. This would be followed by an explanation of factors leading to this. At the bottom of the band, the range of points covered may be narrow or lack detail. Higher in the band, answers will cover more than one factor in a well-developed way or cover several factors in less detail. Question Answer Marks 2(d) Explain why some students may reject the norms and values of a school. Possible answers: • schools divide students into achievers and failures through the testing and setting system and this causes some pupils to become disillusioned and thus to rebel; • functionalist view – part of the wider teenage rejection of authority, testing the boundaries within the transition stage; • status frustration – those who are labelled as failures by the school do not gain status from academic achievement and therefore reject school’s norms and values in order to get this through deviance; • some pupils form an anti-school sub-culture whereby they reject the values of school and create their own hierarchy and opportunities to gain status and respect – often linked to social characteristics of class, gender and/or ethnicity; • school and education is perceived to be feminine, boys are under pressure to assert their masculinity and so reject the school’s norms and values as a way of doing this; • some students have not been socialised into a culture that values education and so are unlikely to conform to the rules it imposes; • some students do not follow the norms and values of a school in order to resist the institution that they believe has failed them and not given them the opportunities to succeed; • for some students an academic education is not accessible or appropriate and there may be no vocational alternatives, therefore they rebel against the school ethos and values; • other reasonable response. Band 0 [0 marks] No creditworthy response. Band 1 [1–3 marks] Answers in this band will show only a limited awareness of why some students may reject the norms and values of a school. A tendency to description is likely. Responses may be short and undeveloped, e.g. ‘they rebel because they find school hard’, stated without explanation. Sociological terms and concepts are unlikely to be used. At the bottom of the band (1 mark), expect one weak point. Higher in the band (2–3 marks), candidates may offer more than one weak point. 8 Question Answer Marks 2(d) Band 2 [4–6 marks] Answers in this band will show basic sociological knowledge and understanding of why some students may reject the norms and values of a school. Responses may be underdeveloped and lacking in range, e.g. ‘schools set pupils based on ability and those in the bottom sets are often looked down on by teachers. This means they see no point to education and so rebel against it instead’. At the bottom of the band, candidates are unlikely to use sociological terms and concepts accurately. Higher in the band, candidates may be beginning to use sociological terms and concepts with greater accuracy. However, some aspects of the answer may only be partially developed/explained. Band 3 [7–8 marks] Answers in this band will show good sociological knowledge and understanding of why some students may reject the norms and values of a school and will be well developed and explained, e.g. ‘students in school who choose not to follow the norms and values are typically male and working class. They are labelled by the teachers as failures and therefore see little point in trying hard, often living up to their self-fulfilling prophecy as they turn to their peer group for status’. They can then expand on the explanation of this and other factors as necessary. Sociological terms and concepts will be used accurately overall. Answers will be well focused on the question and there will be a range of reasons presented. At the top of the band explanations will be clear throughout. Question Answer Marks 2(e) To what extent is the functionalist view of education correct? Possible answers: FOR: • education contributes to the smooth running of society and therefore helps to maintain social order; • schools transmit norms and values to individuals and continue the socialisation that has begun in the family; • schools act as an agency of social control, using sanctions and rewards to reinforce right and wrong and to ensure conformity in pupils; • children are socialised into a shared set of values and therefore they feel a sense of belonging through shared interests and beliefs; • education can promote key values such as patriotism through history and literature lessons, the learning and singing of the national anthem and prominence of national symbols; • education teaches children the importance of achievement, it encourages them to work hard and to set goals, everyone is judged in the same way, it is meritocratic; • education produces individuals with the skills and knowledge necessary to promote economic growth and stability; • role allocation – education ensures the most talented and able children go into the top jobs – examination results ensure that individuals take different career paths suited to their needs and abilities – ‘sifting and sorting’; • functionalists believe that educational success leads to social mobility and greater life chances; • other reasonable response. 15 Question Answer Marks 2(e) AGAINST: • many sociologists believe that there isn’t a shared set of values in society to be passed on through education anymore because of the diverse and multicultural society we live in; • Marxists believe education passes on the dominant ideology and therefore ensures that the status quo is maintained in society; • feminists believe that patriarchal values are transmitted through education in, for example, the perpetuation of traditional and stereotypical gender roles; • some sociologists believe that education is ethnocentric and presents a very narrow view of the world which alienates ethnic minority students; • education is a tool used by the ruling class, according to Marxists, to legitimise and normalise capitalism – competition is promoted in readiness for society and students are indoctrinated into capitalist ideologies; • Marxists believe there is a hidden curriculum in education that serves to promote dominant norms and values that benefit those in positions of power in society e.g. students are trained in dealing with boredom to prepare them for their routine, dull jobs in later life; • education can be unfair – those that pay for an education through private schooling, for example, are likely to gain better examination results than those that attend state schools leading to better jobs in society – this is not meritocratic; • feminists believe there is still gendered subject choice in schools and that this limits the power and status women can have in the labour market in society; • girls are socialised into nurturing and caring roles through education whereas boys are taught to be independent and aggressive – feminism; • functionalist view may be correct for some individuals but may not be the case for everybody – it perhaps depends upon the school itself, the subject choices, the individuals and the type of school; • other reasonable response. Question Answer Marks 2(e) Band 0 [0 marks] No creditworthy response. Band 1 [1–4 marks] Answers in this band may be vague and largely based on common sense showing limited knowledge of the extent to which the functionalist view of education is correct. Use of sociological terms or concepts is very unlikely. Responses may be short, undeveloped and one-sided, e.g. ‘education gives everyone the chance to be successful’. Lower in the band (1–2 marks), expect one or two weak points. Higher in the band (3–4 marks) candidates may offer more than two points or provide a weak definition of key terms, e.g. ‘functionalists say that education is a good thing for everybody’. Band 2 [5–8 marks] In this band candidates will show some basic knowledge of the extent to which the functionalist view of education is correct. Alternatively, they may offer an answer which is list-like in nature but there will be no real attempt to assess the issues raised by the question. There may be limited/some use of sociological terms or concepts. Responses may be underdeveloped and lack range. Answers may be simplistic and two-sided responses are unlikely e.g. ‘education is a key agency of socialisation that teaches norms and values to children and encourages everyone to behave correctly’. Lower in the band, the response will be rather narrow in the points covered and there will be little development. Higher in the band, more points will be covered and there will be limited development of some points. Alternatively, a list-like answer with little development covering both sides of the argument may score up to 8 marks. A one-sided answer cannot score higher than 8 marks. Band 3 [9–12 marks] Answers in this band will show good sociological knowledge and understanding of the extent to which the functionalist view of education is correct. Sociological terms and concepts will be used with greater accuracy and/or frequency. For the most part, answers will be well developed, focused on the question and there will be a range of points presented. Candidates may say that e.g. ‘despite there being many positive factors to education, like gaining skills and knowledge, Marxists believe that it serves the interests of the ruling class and indoctrinates students into capitalist norms and values that ensure the working class remain in their low status positions in society’. There will be a two- sided response but this may be unbalanced. At the bottom of the band, candidates may provide a narrower range of well-developed points. At the top of the band, expect a wider range of points and clear focus on the question. Question Answer Marks 2(e) Band 4 [13–15 marks] Answers in this band will show excellent knowledge and understanding of the extent to which the functionalist view of education is correct. There will be a strong grasp of the argument as well as accurate and frequent use of sociological terms and concepts. Answers will be well developed, clearly focused on the question and discuss a wide range of points. Responses will be two-sided and balanced. At the bottom of the band (13 marks), the answer may lack a specific conclusion. Higher in the band, there will be a clear attempt to offer an assessment of the ‘To what extent«?’ part of the question through a focused conclusion. Candidates should show consideration of points for and against the idea of the functionalist view of education being correct, citing some of the examples given.
2 Some sociologists view education and the official curriculum as essential to improving an individual’s life chances. Other sociologists believe education maintains social inequalities. Whilst every school is different they all operate a system of rules and rewards for students. (a) What is meant by the term ‘official curriculum’? [2] (b) Describe two features of the hidden curriculum. [4] (c) Explain how schools have tried to improve the educational achievement of ethnic minority students. [6] (d) Explain why sanctions are used in schools. [8] (e) To what extent is education a major factor in improving an individual's life chances? [15] Section C: Crime, deviance and social control
35 marks
Mark scheme: 2(a) What is meant by the term ‘official curriculum’. 2 One mark for partial definition e.g. subjects studied Two marks for clear definition e.g. the subjects and lessons studied at school and their content 2(b) Describe two features of the hidden curriculum. 4 Possible answers: • competitive sports and testing – sends out the message that doing better than others is valued in society; • learning the importance of punctuality in school, preparing you for later working life; • through school uniform requirements, students learn expectations for dress codes e.g. at work; • abiding by school rules – you have to do as you’re told by those in authority regardless of whether you agree; • schools are hierarchies – students learn their place in the hierarchy and the associated norms with this status position; • functionalists – hidden curriculum gives the skills and attitudes necessary for the smooth running of society, social order; • Marxists – hidden curriculum maintains the control of the working class by the bourgeoisie; • feminists – students learn the expectations associated with their gender and their future gender roles; • respect and manners and reinforced to students through the hidden curriculum; • values and morals of society are taught and reinforced through the hidden curriculum; • other reasonable response. One mark for each point correctly identified (up to maximum of two). One mark for each point that is developed (up to a maximum of two) 2(c) Explain how schools have tried to improve the educational 6 achievement of ethnic minority students. Candidates may talk about ethnic minority students in general terms or may focus on specific ethnic groups in their answer. Either way is fine to credit. Possible answers: • anti-racism programmes – teachers have been trained in equal opportunities and the need to change their expectations and stereotypes of ethnic minority students; • legislation now exists to ensure that ethnic minority students get a ‘fair deal’ in education; • curriculums are far less ethnocentric in nature today and thus ethnic minority students are far more likely to engage and be successful; • representations of ethnic minority students in textbooks are more regular and frequent meaning that education is seen to be something for everyone; • positive discrimination – schools can place ethnic minority students into higher sets and introduce compensatory education programmes/intervention in order to try and improve performance; • recruitment of more ethnic minority teachers can help ethnic minority students to see that education is something that they can be successful in – positive role modelling; • other reasonable response. Band 0 [0 marks] No creditworthy response Band 1 [1–3 marks] Answers in this band will show only a limited awareness of the question and may talk about ‘not being racist and treating ethnic minority students equally’. Responses may be short and un/underdeveloped. At the bottom of the band (1 mark), expect one weak point. Higher in the band (2–3 marks), candidates may offer more than one weak point, but there may be a tendency towards simplistic answers, engaging with sociological ideas without using sociological language. Band 2 [4–6 marks] A clear and accurate explanation, showing good sociological knowledge and understanding of the question. Sociological terms and concepts should be expected e.g. ‘positive discrimination can be used to try and improve the educational achievement of ethnic minority students. This can involve additional tuition, a non-ethnocentric curriculum, placing EM students into higher sets and bringing in motivational speakers’. This would be followed by explanation of factors leading to this. At the bottom of the band, the range of points covered may be narrow or lack detail. Higher in the band, answers will cover more than one factor in a well-developed way or cover several factors in less detail. 2(d) Explain why sanctions are used in schools. 8 Candidates should show awareness of the various reasons why sanctions (positive rewards and/or negative punishments may be discussed) are used in schools. Possible answers: • negative sanctions such as detentions are used in schools in order to promote conformity; • punishments in schools are used to teach individuals that certain behaviours are ‘wrong’ and should not be repeated; • positive sanctions such as treat trips are used in schools to encourage students to engage in and repeat socially encouraged behaviour; • functionalists believe sanctions in schools are necessary as one of the functions of education is social control – to produce social stability; • feminists believe sanctions are used in schools to maintain patriarchy in terms of gender roles and gender expectations in behaviour and attitudes; • Marxists believe sanctions are used in schools to allow the promotion of the belief that it is ‘natural’ to conform to the wishes of those in positions of authority and power; • sanctions in schools could be seen to be an extension of the power of the state to ideologically control individuals (Marxism) through the promotion of socially approved attitudes, beliefs and behaviour that benefit the ruling class; • Marxists believe sanctions in schools allow the promotion of the capitalist ideology as something that is fair and just; • prizes and rewards are used as positive sanctions in order to raise attainment; • other reasonable response. Band 0[ 0 marks] No creditworthy response Band 1 [1–3 marks] Answers in this band will show only a limited awareness of the question. A tendency to description is likely. Responses may be short and undeveloped e.g. ‘to punish students’. Sociological terms and concepts are unlikely to be used. At the bottom of the band (1 mark), expect one weak point. Higher in the band (2–3 marks), candidates may offer more than one weak point. Band 2 [4–6 marks] Answers in this band will show basic sociological knowledge and understanding of why sanctions are used in schools. Responses may be underdeveloped and lacking in range e.g. ‘sanctions can be punishments or rewards and they make students do what they are told, so acting as a type of social control’. At the bottom of the band, candidates are unlikely to use sociological terms and concepts accurately. Higher in the band, candidates may be beginning to use sociological terms and concepts with greater accuracy. However, some aspects of the answer may only be partially developed/explained. 2(d) Band 3 [7–8 marks] Answers in this band will show good sociological knowledge and understanding of why sanctions are used in schools and will be well developed and explained e.g. ‘Sanctions in school ensure conformity to the roles and to those in positions of authority. For functionalists this is a good thing as it socialises us to accept orders from others and so keeps society running smoothly. For Marxists, though, it allows the ruling class to maintain power over the lower class’. They can then expand on the explanation of this and other factors as necessary. Sociological terms and concepts will be used accurately overall. Answers will be well focused on the question and there will be a range of reasons presented. At the top of the band explanations will be clear throughout. 2(e) To what extent is education a major factor in improving an individual’s 15 life chances? Life Chances – the opportunities that individuals have to improve their lives. Candidates should show awareness of the ways that education can improve a person’s life chances and should also consider how life chances are already fixed and cannot be changed by education. Factors to do with ethnicity, gender and social class may be referred to here. Possible answers: For: • functionalists see education as being meritocratic and so by working hard you will be successful and will improve your life chances; • educational qualifications are seen in MIS’s as being vital in order to obtain professional and high status jobs; • higher education is thought to be a major factor in determining the type and level of job a person can obtain – this then can be life changing; • education is thought to lead to social mobility, offering individuals the opportunity to change their social status and lifestyle; • education is free for children in many countries and so opens doors for everybody in terms of increasing life chances; • education may lead to improved and widened social networks which may heighten job opportunities and prospects; • education can lift poor people out of poverty and break the cycle; • education allows for equality of opportunity regardless of a person’s social characteristics (gender/ethnicity/social class); • compensatory education and/or positive discrimination can improve the life chances of disadvantaged groups; • the teaching of the hidden curriculum promotes life skills and ensures that students know the expected norms and values in order to function successfully and so improves life chances; • other reasonable response. Against: • those with more money have better chances of being successful in education than poorer people e.g. through private education, which then affects life chances; • despite girls performing better than boys in education in many societies, when it comes to life chances, males still fare better e.g. the gender pay gap; • ethnic minorities do not do as well in education as the ethnic majority and therefore do not have improved life chances; • Marxists do not believe that education is meritocratic and instead see it as an institution that maintains social inequalities and thus does not change life chances as it is a tool to keep the working class in their place; • feminists believe that patriarchal ideologies are so ingrained in society that educational performance is irrelevant in determining life chances; 2(e) • life chances may be fixed and ascribed by social characteristics and so education cannot affect life chances (ascribed status); • other social agents e.g. the peer group may be more influential than education in terms of improving life chances; • other reasonable response Band 0 [0 marks] No creditworthy response Band 1 [1–4 marks] Answers in this band will be vague and largely based on common sense showing limited knowledge of the extent of the debate in the question. Use of sociological terms or concepts is very unlikely. Responses may be short, undeveloped and one-sided e.g. ‘qualifications help you get a good job’. Lower in the band (1–2 marks), expect one or two weak points. Higher in the band (3–4 marks) candidates may offer more than two points or provide a weak definition of key terms, e.g. ‘life chances are the opportunities you have to succeed’. Band 2 [5–8 marks] In this band candidates will show some basic knowledge of the extent of the debate in the question. Alternatively, they may offer an answer which is list- like in nature but there will be no real attempt to assess the issues raised by the question. There may be limited/some use of sociological terms or concepts. Responses may be underdeveloped and lack range. Answers may be simplistic and two-sided responses are unlikely e.g. ‘education is often free and available to everyone so if you do well in it you have more chances to improve your status’. Lower in the band, the response will be rather narrow in the points covered and there will be little development. Higher in the band, more points will be covered and there will be limited development of some points. Alternatively, a list-like answer with little development covering both sides of the argument may score up to 8 marks. A one-sided answer cannot score higher than 8 marks. Band 3 [9–12 marks] Answers in this band will show good sociological knowledge and understanding of the extent of the debate in the question. Sociological terms and concepts will be used with greater accuracy and/or frequency. For the most part, answers will be well developed, focused on the question and there will be a range of points presented. Candidates may say that, for example, ‘whilst functionalists believe that education is a meritocratic system, that allows everyone to better themselves if they work and try hard, it remains the case that most people will remain in the class or status position into which they were born. This shows that education has little effect on life chances’. There will be a two-sided response but this may be unbalanced. At the bottom of the band, candidates may provide a narrower range of well-developed points. At the top of the band, expect a wider range of points and clear focus on the question.
3 According to official crime statistics an individual’s social characteristics can affect whether they become a criminal. Some sociologists believe that ethnic minority groups and the lower classes have higher conviction rates due to agencies such as the police and the media. Trends in crime also vary depending on the crime committed, for example whether it is internet crime, green crime or white-collar crime. (a) What is meant by the term ‘internet crime’? [2] (b) Describe two criminal sub-cultures. [4] (c) Explain how the police can cause deviancy amplification. [6] (d) Explain why effective socialisation can reduce crime. [8] (e) To what extent is ethnicity the most important factor in determining whether an individual commits crime? [15] Section D: Media
35 marks
Mark scheme: 3(a) What is meant by the term ‘internet crime’? 2 One mark for partial definition e.g. fraud Two marks for clear definition e.g. illegal act using the web, often referred to as a cybercrime, e.g. identity theft 3(b) Describe two criminal sub-cultures 4 Local examples may well be seen here – these should be duly credited. Possible answers: • gangs e.g. a group of people who use violence and intimidation to commit crime; • mafia – a highly organised criminal sub-culture, often involved in violent crime; • drug dealers – money is made through the illegal drugs trade; • youth sub-cultures such as the Skinheads who engaged in criminal behaviour; • Cloward and Ohlin – illegitimate opportunity structure – successful criminal role models exist in a community to train others to be successful criminals; • sub-cultures on the internet that commit crime e.g. the dark net, terrorist groups etc.; • other reasonable response. One mark for each point correctly identified (up to maximum of two). One mark for each point that is developed (up to a maximum of two) 3(c) Explain how the police can cause deviancy amplification. 6 Deviancy Amplification – when responses to crime and/or deviance by the police lead to greater deviance occurring in society. Possible answers: • police stereotypes and labels of criminals means that some people are more likely to be the subject of police scrutiny than others and this can lead to increased deviance as a response (self-fulfilling prophecy); • police targeting – certain areas are targeted and focused on by the police and thus some groups of people are more likely to be arrested than others – this can lead to anger and frustration and thus increased levels of deviance; • moral panics – such as the Mods and Rockers (Cohen) have shown how the actions of the police can lead to increased levels of deviance amongst the targeted groups of people; • stop and search rates – these are higher for some social groups than others and this can lead to accusations of police bias/riots; • institutional racism and the canteen culture – the police are sometimes accused of racist behaviour and this can then lead to angry retaliation and thus deviancy amplification e.g. rioting; • Jock Young’s study ‘The Drugtakers’, found that police actions and stereotypes led to more illegal drug taking behaviour and so increased the problem; • other reasonable response. Band 0 [0 marks] No creditworthy response Band 1 [1–3 marks] Answers in this band will show only a limited awareness of the question and may talk about e.g. ‘police treat some criminals badly and so others get involved in criminal behaviour’. Responses may be short and un/underdeveloped. At the bottom of the band (1 mark), expect one weak point. Higher in the band (2–3 marks), candidates may offer more than one weak point, but there may be a tendency towards simplistic answers, engaging with sociological ideas without using sociological language. Band 2 [4–6 marks] A clear and accurate explanation, showing good sociological knowledge and understanding of the question. Sociological terms and concepts should be expected e.g. ‘police targeting of powerless groups in society through increased surveillance and high stop and search rates is one reason. The reactions of these groups are unlikely to be positive and may result in feelings of marginalisation and frustration that lead to increased levels of deviance. The London Riots could be one such example of this’. This would be followed by explanation of factors leading to this. At the bottom of the band, the range of points covered may be narrow or lack detail. Higher in the band, answers will cover more than one factor in a well-developed way or cover several factors in less detail. 3(d) Explain why effective socialisation can reduce crime. 8 Candidates should show awareness of the various reasons why effective socialisation can reduce crime. Answers are likely to focus on the family but other factors can also be used. Possible answers: • the media can inform people that deviant behaviour will be punished and encourage shared feelings about what is right and wrong through its representations and content; • religion helps to shape morality and, through rules about behaviour and conduct, encourages us to act in a non-criminal way; • peer group – positive peer pressure can help to reduce crime as we want to ‘fit in’; • the family teaches and reinforces norms and values in the primary stage and is thought by many to be the bedrock of determining whether an individual commits crime; • education encourages individuals to work hard and to expect to work hard in a job in the future, criminality is highly disapproved of as an ‘easy option’; • the workplace can be a big deterrent to committing crime as people do not want to lose their job and the status and/or financial rewards and security it brings; • informal social control uses both negative and positive sanctions to encourage individuals to internalise society’s norms and values and to conform to these – this can reduce crime; • other reasonable response. Band 0 [0 marks] No creditworthy response Band 1 [1–3 marks] Answers in this band will show only a limited awareness of the question. A tendency to description is likely. Responses may be short and undeveloped e.g. ‘someone might be afraid of what their family would say’. Sociological terms and concepts are unlikely to be used. At the bottom of the band (1 mark), expect one weak point. Higher in the band (2–3 marks), candidates may offer more than one weak point. Band 2 [4–6 marks] Answers in this band will show basic sociological knowledge and understanding of why effective socialisation can reduce levels of offending. Responses may be underdeveloped and lacking in range e.g. ‘religion teaches that crime is wrong, is not moral and that it will be punished. This encourages people not to commit crime’. At the bottom of the band, candidates are unlikely to use sociological terms and concepts accurately. Higher in the band, candidates may be beginning to use sociological terms and concepts with greater accuracy. However, some aspects of the answer may only be partially developed/explained. 3(d) Band 3 [7–8 marks] Answers in this band will show good sociological knowledge and understanding of why effective socialisation can reduce levels of offending and will be well developed and explained e.g. ‘all of the agencies of socialisation work together to teach and reinforce right and wrong behaviour in society. Crime is seen to be wrong and is therefore discouraged through a series of positive and negative sanctions’. They can then expand on the explanation of this and other factors as necessary. Sociological terms and concepts will be used accurately overall. Answers will be well focused on the question and there will be a range of reasons presented. At the top of the band explanations will be clear throughout. 3(e) To what extent is ethnicity the most important factor in determining 15 whether an individual commits crime? Candidates should show awareness of the ways that ethnicity is an important factor in determining whether a person commits crime. In evaluation they may consider other social factors such as class, age and gender that may also affect whether an individual commits crime. Ethnicity may be considered as a generic social group or more specific examples of ethnic minorities may be discussed by the candidate e.g. Afro- Caribbean, Pakistani etc. NB: Remember that points can be used for or against the question, depending on the candidate’s explanation. For example, institutional racism could be used to say that ethnicity is an important factor as ethnic minorities perceive it to be unjust and unfair, or it could be used to argue that it’s not ethnicity but police behaviour and perceptions that causes an individual to commit crime. Possible answers: For: • ethnic minorities are also often located within the lower classes/have higher unemployment rates and so may suffer from material deprivation that can lead to crime; • most crime is committed by young people and ethnic minorities have a higher proportion of young people than the majority group hence higher crime rates; • marginalisation may cause ethnic minorities to commit crime as they do not have the same legitimate opportunities for success as the ethnic majority and feel socially excluded; • racism may lead to crime through disillusionment at the unfairness and therefore the rejection of society’s norms and values e.g. law abiding behaviour; • resistance to racism/status frustration may lead to crime as ethnic minorities become angry and frustrated at the way they are treated and so turn to rioting, protesting in response; • ethnic minorities maybe more likely to be involved in gang/street behaviour and so see criminality as a ‘normal’ part of life – street culture; • differential socialisation in terms of ethnicity may determine whether a person commits crime; • ethnicity may lead to crime due to labelling from the police/media which can then lead to a self-fulfilling prophecy and a master status being formed (e.g. Stuart Hall study ‘mugging’); • other reasonable response. 3(e) Against: • ethnic minorities may be subject to institutional racism by the police and the courts and so may just be more likely to be searched, arrested and convicted than the ethnic majority; • victims of crime may be biased and so may be more likely to report crimes committed by ethnic minorities; • police resources typically focus on street crime/urban areas which ethnic minorities are more likely to be involved in rather than hidden corporate or white-collar crime; • gender may be more important than ethnicity in terms of crime e.g. the culture of masculinity, social control of females etc.; • age maybe more important than ethnicity in determining crime rates e.g. low offending rates of the older generation; • social class maybe more important than ethnicity in determining crime rates due to relative deprivation, lack of educational success and unemployment in the lower classes; • most ethnic minority members do not commit crime; • high hidden/dark figure of ethnic majority crime may mean that the OCS’s are misleading; • other reasonable response. Band 0 [0 marks] No creditworthy response Band 1 [1–4 marks] Answers in this band will be vague and largely based on common sense showing limited knowledge of the extent of the debate in the question. Use of sociological terms or concepts is very unlikely. Responses may be short, undeveloped and one-sided e.g. ‘the OCS show that ethnic minorities commit the most crime’. Lower in the band (1–2 marks), expect one or two weak points. Higher in the band (3–4 marks) candidates may offer more than two points or provide a weak definition of key terms e.g. ‘ethnicity is a person’s race’. Band 2 [5–8 marks] In this band candidates will show some basic knowledge of the extent of the debate in the question. Alternatively, they may offer an answer which is list- like in nature but there will be no real attempt to assess the issues raised by the question. There may be limited/some use of sociological terms or concepts. Responses may be underdeveloped and lack range. Answers may be simplistic and two-sided responses are unlikely e.g. ‘ethnic minorities are often poor and so they may commit crime for money’. Lower in the band, the response will be rather narrow in the points covered and there will be little development. Higher in the band, more points will be covered and there will be limited development of some points. Alternatively, a list-like answer with little development covering both sides of the argument may score up to 8 marks. A one-sided answer cannot score higher than 8 marks. 3(e) Band 3 [9–12 marks] Answers in this band will show good sociological knowledge and understanding of the extent of the debate in the question. Sociological terms and concepts will be used with greater accuracy and/or frequency. For the most part, answers will be well developed, focused on the question and there will be a range of points presented. Candidates may say that, for example, ‘the OCS does not give the full picture when it comes to ethnic minority crime and it may be that this only appears high because of police targeting areas where ethnic minorities live. They are then more likely to be stopped and searched and arrested resulting in a hidden figure of ethnic majority crime’. There will be a two-sided response but this may be unbalanced. At the bottom of the band, candidates may provide a narrower range of well-developed points. At the top of the band, expect a wider range of points and clear focus on the question. Band 4 [13–15 marks] Answers in this band will show excellent knowledge and understanding of the extent of the debate in the question. There will be a strong grasp of the argument as well as accurate and frequent use of sociological terms and concepts. Answers will be well developed, clearly focused on the question and discuss a wide range of points. Responses will be two-sided and balanced. At the bottom of the band (13 marks), the answer may lack a specific conclusion. Higher in the band, there will be a clear attempt to offer an assessment of the ‘To what extent.?’ part of the question through a focused conclusion. Candidates should show consideration of points for and against the debate in the question, citing some of the examples given.
4 In the past media owners and professionals were criticised for creating folk devils. Today new media have given more power and control to the audience and media is starting to change.This may affect how the audience use and interpret media content. (a) What is meant by the term ‘folk devils’? [2] (b) Describe two types of new media. [4] (c) Explain how diversification occurs in today’s media industry. [6] (d) Explain why the uses and gratifications model of media effects can be criticised. [8] (e) To what extent do media professionals such as editors and journalists control media content? [15]
35 marks
Mark scheme: 4(a) What is meant by the term ‘folk devils’? 2 One mark for partial definition e.g. bad people in the media Two marks for clear definition e.g. a group who are presented as scapegoats in a moral panic 4(b) Describe two types of new media. 4 New Media – technologies that are usually digital and involve greater interactivity for the audience plus on-demand access. Examples may be seen and credited here. Possible answers: • websites e.g. for a music magazine; • forums/chat rooms/message boards; • social networking sites e.g. facebook, Twitter etc.; • instant messaging and email via multiple platforms and technologies; • blogging/vlogging where content is created and commented on by the audience; • video-sharing websites such as Youtube, user generated content; • hardware e.g. smartphones, smart TVs that allow for convergence; • other reasonable response. One mark for each point correctly identified (up to maximum of two). One mark for each point that is developed (up to a maximum of two) 4(c) Explain how diversification occurs in today’s media industry. 6 Diversification – when media corporations extend their activities into different areas. Candidates are likely to use examples in their answers to support the points made. Note: pay close attention to what the candidate is saying here as some are confusing diversification with diversity – such answers are unlikely to be creditworthy. Possible answers: • media corporations extend their interests into other media areas e.g. News Corporation, Disney, Amazon to increase their stronghold on a market; • media corporations extend their interests into other non-media areas e.g. Virgin (music, money, travel etc.) and so become more powerful; • diversification occurs to produce greater profits for a company therefore is frequently seen today; • diversification can enable the spread of a particular set of messages, values and ideologies across a range of different platforms e.g. propaganda, bias etc.; • diversification can be seen as a means of reducing/spreading the risk in the media industry by having assets in more areas; • other reasonable response. Band 0 [0 marks] No creditworthy response Band 1 [1–3 marks] Answers in this band will show only a limited awareness of the question and may talk about ‘media companies spreading out into different areas’. Responses may be short and un/underdeveloped. At the bottom of the band (1 mark), expect one weak point. Higher in the band (2–3 marks), candidates may offer more than one weak point, but there may be a tendency towards simplistic answers, engaging with sociological ideas without using sociological language. Band 2 [4–6 marks] A clear and accurate explanation, showing good sociological knowledge and understanding of the question. Sociological terms and concepts should be expected e.g. ‘diversification is where a media company such as Murdoch’s News International expands into different areas. This results in the company having greater control over media content and being a more powerful and influential institution. Profits are also increased as the company becomes a media corporation’. This would be followed by explanation of factors leading to this. At the bottom of the band, the range of points covered may be narrow or lack detail. Higher in the band, answers will cover more than one factor in a well-developed way or cover several factors in less detail. 4(d) Explain why the uses and gratifications model of media effects can be 8 criticised. Candidates should show awareness of the various reasons why the UAG model of media effects can be criticised. This could be generally or could focus on specific aspects of the model e.g. personal identity. Other media effects theories may be used to criticise it but this is not essential. Possible answers: • the UAG model only looks at how people use the media, it does not look at the messages that the media transmits; • the UAG model overlooks how the social context of audiences such as ethnic groups, social class, gender and age influences how different social groups use the media differently; • new media is far more interactive than traditional media and so offers new ways for how the audience use the media – the UAG model doesn’t account for this; • UAG model ignores the fact that the audience can only consume what media products are on offer to choose from – therefore the media industry still has power over the audience; • the UAG model suggests that there are only four main ways that the audience use the media – there is likely to be far more than this; • candidates may refer to another media effects model e.g. hypodermic needle/cultural effects in order to criticise the UAG model e.g. hypodermic needle model would say that the audience are affected by the media rather than the audience controlling the effects of the media – media violence leading to copycat killings; • candidates may specifically criticise the four media uses that the theory identifies (more than one point could be made from this) – entertainment, personal relationships, information and personal identity (other names for the four uses may be seen e.g. escapism rather than entertainment, obviously =this is fine to credit); • other reasonable response. Band 0 [0 marks] No creditworthy response Band 1 [1–3 marks] Answers in this band will show only a limited awareness of the question. A tendency to description is likely. Responses may be short and undeveloped e.g. ‘UAG model isn’t really about new media’. Sociological terms and concepts are unlikely to be used. At the bottom of the band (1 mark), expect one weak point. Higher in the band (2–3 marks), candidates may offer more than one weak point. 4(d) Band 2 [4–6 marks] Answers in this band will show basic sociological knowledge and understanding of why the UAG model of media effects can be criticised. Responses may be underdeveloped and lacking in range e.g. ‘the UAG model says that people use the media for different things but it doesn’t consider the powerful messages that the media can transmit such as advertising and propaganda’. At the bottom of the band, candidates are unlikely to use sociological terms and concepts accurately. Higher in the band, candidates may be beginning to use sociological terms and concepts with greater accuracy. However, some aspects of the answer may only be partially developed/explained. Band 3 [7–8 marks] Answers in this band will show good sociological knowledge and understanding of why the UAG model of media effects can be criticised and will be well developed and explained e.g. ‘because the UAG model attempted to explain how the audience used traditional media, it doesn’t consider the huge changes in the industry since the advent of new media. The digital and global nature of the industry and products today means that the audience are far more interactive than ever before and so are finding new ways to use the media which had never been considered by UAG’. They can then expand on the explanation of this and other factors as necessary. Sociological terms and concepts will be used accurately overall. Answers will be well focused on the question and there will be a range of reasons presented. At the top of the band explanations will be clear throughout. 4(e) To what extent do media professionals such as editors and journalists 15 control media content? Media Professionals – editors, journalists, directors, producers etc. Candidates should show awareness of the ways that various media professionals can control the content of the media. Candidates may talk about traditional and new media in their answer. In evaluation, candidates could consider other controls over the content of the media apart from media professionals e.g. the audience, the state, media owners etc. Possible answers: For: • media professionals make decisions about what the audience are allowed to consume – they effectively set the agenda; • news values (as determined by media professionals) determine the content of the news e.g. human interest stories, natural disasters, murder etc.; • editing and cutting decisions drastically affect the content of the media and these decisions are made by media professionals; • GUMG (Glasgow University Media Group) discovered that the news took a conservative stance in its reporting and it was the media professionals that created this bias; • media professionals are thought to share similar backgrounds (e.g. white, male, middle aged and middle class) and so create a media world view that is very conservative, homogenous and non- confrontational; • media professionals are employed by other people (boss) therefore they will ensure that media content reflects the wishes of their employers, otherwise they may lose their job; • media professionals make the day-to-day decisions regarding time and space available in the media and so determine its content; • gatekeepers decide what to select and what to discard and this therefore determines media content; • other reasonable response. Against: • in many countries it is the state that controls the content of the media through public service broadcasting and propaganda; • it is not media professionals but large media corporations that control the content of the media through their huge brands e.g. Disney; • it is advertisers, not media professionals, who control the content of the media as the media industry needs to pander to the advertisers in order to raise revenue; • government censorship controls the content of the media through legislation such as the Official Secrets Act, laws of libel etc.; • content of films is controlled through the certification system e.g. BBFC, gaming through PEGI etc.; 4(e) • new media means that it may be the audience who control the content of the media through UGC (user generated content) and citizen journalism; • the audience can be said to control content through their power as consumers – if they don’t like the content they won’t buy or consume it; • social media, blogs/vlogs and forums means that it is the audience who directly control media content not the professionals as they make it; • other reasonable response. Band 0 [0 marks] No creditworthy response Band 1 [1–4 marks] Answers in this band will be vague and largely based on common sense showing limited knowledge of the extent of the debate in the question. Use of sociological terms or concepts is very unlikely. Responses may be short, undeveloped and one-sided e.g. ‘they control content because they decide what to put into the media’. Lower in the band (1–2 marks), expect one or two weak points. Higher in the band (3–4 marks) candidates may offer more than two points or provide a weak definition of key terms e.g. ‘media professionals can be editors and journalists’. Band 2 [5–8 marks] In this band candidates will show some basic knowledge of the extent of the debate in the question. Alternatively, they may offer an answer which is list- like in nature but there will be no real attempt to assess the issues raised by the question. There may be limited/some use of sociological terms or concepts. Responses may be underdeveloped and lack range. Answers may be simplistic and two-sided responses are unlikely e.g. ‘news values means that some stories are thought to be more important than others – media professionals will use these to decide the content of the media’. Lower in the band, the response will be rather narrow in the points covered and there will be little development. Higher in the band, more points will be covered and there will be limited development of some points. Alternatively, a list-like answer with little development covering both sides of the argument may score up to 8 marks. A one-sided answer cannot score higher than 8 marks. 4(e) Band 3 [9–12 marks] Answers in this band will show good sociological knowledge and understanding of the extent of the debate in the question. Sociological terms and concepts will be used with greater accuracy and/or frequency. For the most part, answers will be well developed, focused on the question and there will be a range of points presented. Candidates may say that, for example, ‘despite media professionals clearly being involved in the day-to- day decisions regarding media content, they are not the only people to influence content. Media today is largely privately owned and therefore is set up to make a profit. To do so media needs to appeal to a mass audience in order to attract advertising revenue. It is economic factors such as this that determine content’. There will be a two-sided response but this may be unbalanced. At the bottom of the band, candidates may provide a narrower range of well-developed points. At the top of the band, expect a wider range of points and clear focus on the question. Band 4 [13–15 marks] Answers in this band will show excellent knowledge and understanding of the extent of the debate in the question. There will be a strong grasp of the argument as well as accurate and frequent use of sociological terms and concepts. Answers will be well developed, clearly focused on the question and discuss a wide range of points. Responses will be two-sided and balanced. At the bottom of the band (13 marks), the answer may lack a specific conclusion. Higher in the band, there will be a clear attempt to offer an assessment of the ‘To what extent.?’ part of the question through a focused conclusion. Candidates should show consideration of points for and against the debate in the question, citing some of the examples given.
2 Sociologists debate the reasons why some individuals do better in education than others. Anti-school sub-cultures and family background are two explanations that are often considered. Schools have introduced programmes such as positive discrimination to try and make school a better experience for all. (a) What is meant by the term 'positive discrimination'? [2] (b) Describe two sociological reasons why children go to school. [4] (c) Explain how anti-school sub-cultures can affect educational achievement. [6] (d) Explain why schools are not functional for all students. [8] (e) To what extent does family background influence educational achievement? [15] Section C: Crime, deviance and social control
35 marks
Mark scheme: 2(a) What is meant by the term ‘positive discrimination’? 2 One mark for partial definition e.g. treating some people differently to others Two marks for clear definition e.g. giving disadvantaged groups better treatment than others to try and make up for their disadvantage 2(b) Describe two sociological reasons why children go to school. 4 Responses may engage with functionalist and/or Marxist theory in their response, although this is not necessary for the marks to be awarded. Possible answers: • to learn the necessary knowledge and skills for society; • to be socialised into the norms and values of society; • to learn social expectations such as how to get on with others; • to control the thoughts and behaviour of children; • to learn the importance of conformity through sanctions and social control; • to learn and accept their future roles in society; • to be prepared for the world of work e.g. ICT skills, importance of punctuality etc.; • feminism – to learn that males have more power than females in society thus reinforcing patriarchy; • Marxism – to learn to be a good, conformist worker for capitalist society; • other reasonable response. One mark for each point correctly identified (up to maximum of two). One mark for each point that is developed (up to a maximum of two). 2(c) Explain how anti-school sub-cultures can affect educational 6 achievement. Possible answers: • these sub-cultures reject the rules and values of the school and develop an alternative value system instead which may disrupt educational achievement; • these sub-cultures are peer group based and therefore there is a lot of pressure not to conform to school norms and values thus affecting achievement; • these sub-cultures are often associated with lower sets and streams where educational achievement is less – teacher expectations; • teacher labelling – those in an anti-school subculture may be negatively labelled by their teachers so leading to a self-fulfilling prophecy of low educational achievement; • the counter values of anti-school sub-cultures often involve truancy, getting into mischief, not completing work and being rude to the teacher – these are unlikely to lead to high educational achievement; • anti-school sub-cultures allow students to gain respect and status from their peer group therefore there is less of a need to gain this from educational achievement; • Paul Willis’ study – the working class ‘lads’ came to school not to learn but to ‘have a laugh’, enjoying breaking the school rules and messing about in and out of lessons to annoy teachers; • other reasonable response. Band 0 [0 marks] No creditworthy response Band 1 [1–3 marks] Answers in this band will show only a limited awareness of the question and may talk about ‘naughty students who don’t do their school work’. Responses may be short and un / underdeveloped. At the bottom of the band (1 mark), expect one weak point. Higher in the band (2–3 marks), candidates may offer more than one weak point, but there may be a tendency towards simplistic answers, engaging with sociological ideas without using sociological language. Band 2 [4–6 marks] A clear and accurate explanation, showing good sociological knowledge and understanding of the question. Sociological terms and concepts should be expected e.g. ‘anti-school sub-cultures are based on an alternative set of values than those associated with educational success. Peer group pressure means that students search for status from their peer group rather than from doing well at school. This often results in work not being completed, truancy and being placed into lower sets’. This would be followed by explanation of factors leading to this. At the bottom of the band, the range of points covered may be narrow or lack detail. Higher in the band, answers will cover more than one factor in a well-developed way or cover several factors in less detail. 2(d) Explain why schools are not functional for all students. 8 Candidates should show an awareness of the various reasons why schools are not functional for all students. Possible answers: • feminists believe that schools benefit males more than females; • Marxists believe that schools benefit the higher classes rather than the lower classes; • setting and streaming means that the experience of schooling for students can be very different with those in the lower sets often experiencing low teacher expectations; • the ethnocentric curriculum may mean that schools are not perceived to address the needs of ethnic minority students; • schools have been accused of institutional racism and so may not be functional for ethnic minority students; • anti-school sub-cultures evidence the fact that not all students engage well with schools and value education – students rebel against the social control; • teacher stereotyping and labelling means that some students may not be well thought of and may suffer from a self-fulfilling prophecy; • other reasonable response. Band 0 [0 marks] No creditworthy response Band 1 [1–3 marks] Answers in this band will show only a limited awareness of the question. Responses may be short and un / underdeveloped. For example, ‘not all students do well at school, some are naughty and do not do their work’. At the bottom of the band (1 mark), expect one weak point. Higher in the band (2–3 marks), candidates may offer more than one weak point, but there may be a tendency towards simplistic answers, engaging with sociological ideas without using sociological language. Band 2 [4–6 marks] A clear and accurate explanation, showing good sociological knowledge and understanding of the question. Sociological terms and concepts should be expected. For example, ‘ Setting and streaming is thought by the labelling theory to stereotype some students as successes and some as failures. This can cause a self-fulfilling prophecy to occur’. This would be followed by explanation of factors leading to this. At the bottom of the band, the range of points covered may be narrow or lack detail. Higher in the band, answers will cover more than one factor in a well-developed way or cover several factors in less detail. 2(d) Band 3 [7–8 marks] Answers in this band will show good sociological knowledge and understanding of the question. For example, ‘Marxists talk about education being a tool of the ruling class that exploits the working class through Bourdieu’s idea of capital, setting and streaming and negative teacher labelling. This may result in the formation of an anti-school sub-culture where academic achievement is low’. They can then expand on the explanation of this and other factors as necessary. Sociological terms and concepts will be used accurately overall. Answers will be well focused on the question and there will be a range of reasons presented. At the top of the band explanations will be clear throughout. 2(e) To what extent does family background influence educational 15 achievement? In interpreting ‘family background’, candidates may discuss factors such as ethnicity, religion, social class, locality, culture etc. Candidates should show awareness of the ways that family background may influence educational achievement. This could be culturally and/or materially. In evaluation, they should consider how these family factors may not influence educational achievement and discuss how other factors such as school / peer group can be influential instead. Possible answers: For: • material factors – children living in poverty are likely to be educationally disadvantaged i.e. over-crowded accommodation, part-time jobs, few resources to support education at home etc; • cultural factors – members of the working class are thought to want immediate rather than deferred gratification and therefore value education less than middle class parents; • there may be an absence of successful role models in the family who have done well in education and therefore this route is not seen as an option for many children; • Bourdieu – cultural capital – familiarity with literature, visits to museums and galleries and knowledge of how the education system works are seen to advantage some children in education; • gender roles – girls may be socialised to see their future roles in terms of marriage and children and not in terms of educational success; • Bernstein – believes the working class use a restricted code and the higher classes an elaborated code at home which makes the ‘world’ of education far easier to access and be successful in; • minority students may be taught in a language that is not their home language and so may face problems of understanding and of written / verbal expression; • other reasonable response. 2(e) Against: • pupil sub-cultures may be influential over educational achievement (pro or anti-school sub-cultures); the set / stream a pupil is in may be a very important factor in determining educational achievement; • teacher expectations may affect educational achievement through labelling and the self-fulfilling prophecy or the halo effect; • students in private schools typically achieve better educational qualifications than those in state schools, perhaps due to smaller class sizes, better resources and better teachers; • the ethnocentric curriculum may be a reason why ethnic minority students do less well in education than others; • schools can be seen as institutions that reinforce traditional gender roles through careers advice, subject choice etc and this can affect educational achievement; • a culture of masculinity is encouraged in many peer groups and this makes it very difficult for males to be hard working and studious in school; • government / school policy may influence educational achievement more than family background e.g. girls aren’t always sent to school / compensatory education etc; • other reasonable response. Band 0 [0 marks] No creditworthy response Band 1 [1–4 marks] Answers in this band will be vague and largely based on common sense showing limited knowledge of the extent of the question. Use of sociological terms or concepts is very unlikely. Responses may be short, undeveloped and one-sided. For example, ‘if parents don’t think education is important then the children won’t either’. Lower in the band (1–2 marks), expect one or two weak points. Higher in the band (3–4 marks) candidates may offer more than two points or provide a weak definition of key terms. Band 2 [5–8 marks] In this band candidates will show some basic knowledge of the extent of the question. Alternatively, they may offer an answer which is list-like in nature but there will be no real attempt to assess the issues raised by the question. There may be limited / some use of sociological terms or concepts. Responses may be underdeveloped and lack range. Answers may be simplistic and two-sided responses are unlikely. For example, ‘families with more money are able to buy resources like laptops and revision guides which can help to improve student achievement, poorer students can’t afford this’. Lower in the band, the response will be rather narrow in the points covered and there will be little development. Higher in the band, more points will be covered and there will be limited development of some points. Alternatively, a list-like answer with little development covering both sides of the argument may score up to 8 marks. A one-sided answer cannot score higher than 8 marks. 2(e) Band 3 [9–12 marks] Answers in this band will show good sociological knowledge and understanding of the extent of the debate in the question. Sociological terms and concepts will be used with greater accuracy and/or frequency. For the most part, answers will be well developed, focused on the question and there will be a range of points presented. For example, ‘As Bourdieu points out family background is very important when it comes to capital however it is not the only relevant factor. For ethnic minorities it might be an ethnocentric curriculum and institutional racism that determines educational success, for example’. There will be a two-sided response but this may be unbalanced. At the bottom of the band, candidates may provide a narrower range of well- developed points. At the top of the band, expect a wider range of points and clear focus on the question. Band 4 [13–15 marks] Answers in this band will show excellent knowledge and understanding of the extent to which family background influences educational achievement. There will be a strong grasp of the argument as well as accurate and frequent use of sociological terms and concepts. Answers will be well developed, clearly focused on the question and discuss a wide range of points. Responses will be two-sided and balanced. At the bottom of the band (13 marks), the answer may lack a specific conclusion. Higher in the band, there will be a clear attempt to offer an assessment of the ‘To what extent?’ part of the question through a focused conclusion. Candidates should show consideration of points for and against the debate in the question, citing some of the examples given.
3 Crime remains a big problem in society with many people believing that crime rates are rising. Formal and informal agencies of social control are used to try and stop deviant behaviour and make individuals conform. Prisons, fines and community sentencing are all used to try and solve the crime problem. This is not always successful and for some individuals the label ‘criminal’ affects their master status. (a) What is meant by the term 'community sentencing'? [2] (b) Describe two crimes related to new technologies. [4] (c) Explain how crime rates are measured. [6] (d) Explain why labelling an individual as ‘criminal’ can affect their master status. [8] (e) To what extent can agencies of social control prevent crime? [15] Section D: Media
35 marks
Mark scheme: 3(a) What is meant by the term ‘community sentencing’? 2 One mark for partial definition e.g. doing work in the community Two marks for clear definition e.g. a punishment that involves a non- custodial sentence like carrying work out for the community e.g. litter picking. 3(b) Describe two crimes related to new technologies. 4 Candidates may describe specific crimes in their response or may describe a type of crime – either way is fine to credit. Possible answers: • cybercrime – crimes involving new technologies such as computers; • fraud / identity theft e.g. creating false social media accounts for criminal activity; • the spreading of obscene or offensive content via the internet (the dark web / net may be referred to); • harassment through the internet e.g. cyberbullying; • trading in illegal goods / drugs; • cyberterrorism – the internet is used to deliberately attack computer networks e.g. to disable a Government website; • internet crime and scams – crimes committed through use of the internet e.g. hacking; • people / human trafficking e.g. for sex crimes, slavery etc; • other reasonable response. One mark for each point correctly identified (up to maximum of two). One mark for each point that is developed (up to a maximum of two). 3(c) Explain how crime rates are measured. 6 Possible answers: • police records of the numbers of crimes committed based on crimes reported to them and crimes recorded by them; • court records of the total number of convictions for different offences and the social characteristics of the offenders; • Government official statistics published each year compiled from figures submitted by all police forces used to measure patterns and trends and make comparisons; • national victim surveys (e.g. the Crime Survey of England and Wales / British Crime Survey) that ask a representative sample of people whether they have been a victim of crime, often in the past year; • local victim surveys that try and establish the amount and type of crime in a particular area e.g. Lea and Young / Islington Survey etc; • feminist victim surveys that focus particularly on women’s experiences as victims of crime e.g. sexual crimes and uncover much of the OCS’s ‘dark figure’; • self-report studies – these ask a sample of people what crimes they have committed in the last year; • non-official measures e.g. surveys, questionnaires etc that are often used by sociologists to measure crime rates; • other reasonable response. Band 0 [0 marks] No creditworthy response Band 1 [1–3 marks] Answers in this band will show only a limited awareness of the question and may talk about ‘percentages of crimes shown in the media’. Responses may be short and un / underdeveloped. At the bottom of the band (1 mark), expect one weak point. Higher in the band (2–3 marks), candidates may offer more than one weak point, but there may be a tendency towards simplistic answers, engaging with sociological ideas without using sociological language. Band 2 [4–6 marks] A clear and accurate explanation, showing good sociological knowledge and understanding of the question. Sociological terms and concepts should be expected e.g. ‘Sociologists use a wide variety of means to measure crime. The official way is through analysis of the official crime statistics that show patterns and trends in offending. However, other alternatives have also been developed such as victim surveys which ask a sample of people whether they have been a victim of crime in the last year. An example of this is The Islington Crime Survey from the UK’. This would be followed by explanation of factors leading to this. At the bottom of the band, the range of points covered may be narrow or lack detail. Higher in the band, answers will cover more than one factor in a well-developed way or cover several factors in less detail. 3(d) Explain why labelling an individual as ‘criminal’ can affect their master 8 status. Candidates should show an awareness of the various reasons why the label ‘criminal’ can affect an individual’s master status. Master status – a status that overrides all others and becomes the way that individuals see themselves and are seen by others. Possible answers: • the label of ‘criminal’ is a negative one and can override all other labels that an individual has e.g. when looking for a job; • Cicourel proved that working class youths were more likely to be labelled and thought of as criminals than the middle class so making them more likely to be targeted by the police; • if others think of an individual in a particular way e.g. as a criminal, then this label may stick and become a self-fulfilling prophecy for the person; • the labelled person’s identity may change as they adopt a deviant career and join an organised criminal group due to being labelled as criminal; • others may reject an individual if they are believed to be criminal and therefore the individual spends more and more time with other criminals, so reinforcing their criminal master status; • ethnicity – higher rates of stop and search by the police may lead to a self-fulfilling prophecy and so make some ethnic minorities more likely to be caught and labelled as criminals; • other reasonable response. Band 0 [0 marks] No creditworthy response Band 1 [1–3 marks] Answers in this band will show only a limited awareness of the question. Responses may be short and undeveloped / underdeveloped. For example, ‘Everyone thinks that the person is a thief’. At the bottom of the band (1 mark), expect one weak point. Higher in the band (2–3 marks), candidates may offer more than one weak point, but there may be a tendency towards simplistic answers, engaging with sociological ideas without using sociological language. Band 2 [4–6 marks] A clear and accurate explanation, showing good sociological knowledge and understanding of the question. Sociological terms and concepts should be expected. For example, ‘The label may become a person’s master status through the self-fulfilling prophecy where they start to act like the label’. This would be followed by explanation of factors leading to this. At the bottom of the band, the range of points covered may be narrow or lack detail. Higher in the band, answers will cover more than one factor in a well-developed way or cover several factors in less detail. 3(d) Band 3 [7–8 marks] Answers in this band will show good sociological knowledge and understanding of the question. For example, ‘Cicourel’s study shows that the police and the courts have a stereotypical idea of who the typical delinquent is. This means that the police will target these people most frequently which may cause them to become disillusioned with the police and so cause deviancy amplification. In this way they have started to be thought of in terms of the negative label of ‘criminal’ and it has become their master status. They can then expand on the explanation of this and other factors as necessary. Sociological terms and concepts will be used accurately overall. Answers will be well focused on the question and there will be a range of reasons presented. At the top of the band explanations will be clear throughout. 3(e) To what extent can agencies of social control prevent crime? 15 Candidates may refer to agencies of social control generally or may choose to discuss specific agencies more explicitly. Both formal and informal agencies could be discussed here. To evaluate, candidates may consider how agencies of social control (either collectively or individually) cannot prevent crime and so may consider other preventative measures instead. Possible answers: For: • informal agencies of social control can use negative and positive sanctions to ensure people conform to society’s norms and values; • formal agencies of social control are enforced by government and its agencies and so can prevent crime through rules and legislation; • family can prevent crime through effective socialisation and through the bond created between members (Hirschi); • education can prevent crime through teachings about right and wrong through the hidden curriculum and through citizenship / morality lessons; • religion can prevent crime through teachings about the afterlife and rewards and punishments based on life choices; • media can prevent crime through showing the consequences of being a criminal and through public naming and shaming; • peer group can prevent crime through being pro-school and valuing educational success and working hard; • police can prevent crime through the power of arrest and their presence – a deterrent; • courts can prevent crime through sending out a clear message about the consequences of criminality through their sentencing; • prisons can prevent crime by taking away a person’s freedom and removing criminals from society; • other reasonable response. Against: • agencies of social control can be ignored and therefore may not prevent crime; • socialisation processes do not guarantee conformity to societal norms and values; • informal agencies do not prevent crime – if they did there would be no need for formal agencies; • formal agencies do not prevent crime – despite their existence we still have high rates of criminality in society; • outside agencies offering restorative justice may be more successful at preventing crime; • outside agencies offering therapy, rehab and discussion groups may be better equipped to prevent crime; • structural factors may cause crime e.g. poverty / racism and therefore agencies of social control will not be able to combat this; • biological factors may cause crime e.g. the criminal genes / hormones and therefore agencies of social control will not be able to combat this; • other reasonable response 3(e) Band 0 [0 marks] No creditworthy response Band 1 [1–4 marks] Answers in this band will be vague and largely based on common sense showing limited knowledge of the extent of the question. Use of sociological terms or concepts is very unlikely. Responses may be short, undeveloped and one-sided. For example, ‘prisons control crime because people get locked up’. Lower in the band (1–2 marks), expect one or two weak points. Higher in the band (3–4 marks) candidates may offer more than two points or provide a weak definition of key terms. Band 2 [5–8 marks] In this band candidates will show some basic knowledge of the extent of the question. Alternatively, they may offer an answer which is list-like in nature but there will be no real attempt to assess the issues raised by the question. There may be limited / some use of sociological terms or concepts. Responses may be underdeveloped and lack range. Answers may be simplistic and two-sided responses are unlikely. For example, ‘the family can prevent crime by making sure that people are socialised correctly to know the difference between right and wrong’. ‘Lower in the band, the response will be rather narrow in the points covered and there will be little development. Higher in the band, more points will be covered and there will be limited development of some points. Alternatively, a list-like answer with little development covering both sides of the argument may score up to 8 marks.A one-sided answer cannot score higher than 8 marks. Band 3 [9–12 marks] Answers in this band will show good sociological knowledge and understanding of the extent of the debate in the question. Sociological terms and concepts will be used with greater accuracy and/or frequency. For the most part, answers will be well developed, focused on the question and there will be a range of points presented. For example, ‘agencies of social control can be both formal and informal and all can help to prevent crime. However, they are not completely successful because we still have high crime rates and rates of re-offending remain high’. There will be a two-sided response but this may be unbalanced. At the bottom of the band, candidates may provide a narrower range of well-developed points. At the top of the band, expect a wider range of points and clear focus on the question. Band 4 [13–15 marks] Answers in this band will show excellent knowledge and understanding of the extent to which agencies of social control can prevent crime. There will be a strong grasp of the argument as well as accurate and frequent use of sociological terms and concepts. Answers will be well developed, clearly focused on the question and discuss a wide range of points. Responses will be two-sided and balanced. At the bottom of the band (13 marks), the answer may lack a specific conclusion. Higher in the band, there will be a clear attempt to offer an assessment of the ‘To what extent.?’ part of the question through a focused conclusion. Candidates should show consideration of points for and against the debate in the question, citing some of the examples given.
4 Young people are not always presented fairly in the media. Many sociologists believe that they are represented stereotypically and can sometimes be shown as scapegoats. The audience now have more power to influence media content and therefore many sociologists believe that representations of age will start to change. (a) What is meant by the term 'scapegoats'? [2] (b) Describe two ways the audience can influence media content. [4] (c) Explain how the media create folk devils. [6] (d) Explain why media content needs to be controlled. [8] (e) To what extent are representations of age in the media stereotypical? [15]
35 marks
Mark scheme: 4(a) What is meant by the term ‘scapegoats’? 2 One mark for partial definition e.g. blamed for something Two marks for clear definition e.g. a group singled out for negative treatment after being wrongly blamed for something 4(b) Describe two ways the audience can influence media content. 4 Possible answers: • user generated content – the audience upload content to the media; • citizen journalism – the audience write, create and influence news content; • interactivity e.g. voting for acts on television shows influences media content; • pressure groups – can lobby and push for change to media content; • self-censorship by the audience e.g. parental filters allows the audience to influence media content; • the audience can choose the channel / print product / web content that they wish to consume and so are in charge of the content they consume; • personalisation – having news, for example, on particular topics emailed to them influences content; • contributions to online discussions, forums, chat rooms influences content; • making a website or writing a blog influences media content; • the audience have control of social media e.g. can control who they follow on Twitter, the content and style of their Facebook profile etc; • other reasonable response. One mark for each point correctly identified (up to maximum of two). One mark for each point that is developed (up to a maximum of two). 4(c) Explain how the media create folk devils. 6 Possible answers: • media content is decided by a small group of people and their views may well be biased against certain groups e.g. young people, so creating folk devils; • within a moral panic, events and actions can be exaggerated and sensationalised so leading to the formation of folk devils; • media labelling of some social groups can lead to a self-fulfilling prophecy which in turn creates a folk devil; • certain stereotypical representations are dominant in the media and this leads to the creation and reinforcement of folk devils; • some social groups are blamed by the media for problems in society (scapegoated) and so become folk devils; • Cohen’s study of the Mods and the Rockers may be quoted as an example of a moral panic made by the media; • Fawbert’s study of the ‘hoodies’ maybe used as a more modern example of the media creating folk devils; • social media today can create a moral panic through the speed of sharing information as stories and news goes viral on a global scale; • repetition of ‘facts’ can cause folk devils to be created as people start to believe the dominant media message; • other reasonable response. Band 0 [0 marks] No creditworthy response Band 1 [1–3 marks] Answers in this band will show only a limited awareness of the question and may talk about ‘the important people control what’s put into the media’. Responses may be short and un / underdeveloped. At the bottom of the band (1 mark), expect one weak point. Higher in the band (2–3 marks), candidates may offer more than one weak point, but there may be a tendency towards simplistic answers, engaging with sociological ideas without using sociological language. Band 2 [4–6 marks] A clear and accurate explanation, showing good sociological knowledge and understanding of the question. Sociological terms and concepts should be expected e.g. ‘the study by Cohen on the Mods and the Rockers shows how the media can create folk devils through their stereotypical, negative and repeated representations. This study shows how sensationalised the media reporting really was’. This would be followed by explanation of factors leading to this. At the bottom of the band, the range of points covered may be narrow or lack detail. Higher in the band, answers will cover more than one factor in a well-developed way or cover several factors in less detail. 4(d) Explain why media content needs to be controlled. 8 Candidates should show awareness of the various reasons why media content needs to be controlled. Possible answers: • vulnerable groups in the population e.g. children, need to be protected from adult content hence film certification and parental advisory censorship; • laws are needed to protect the state e.g. UK Official Secrets Act; • libel and slander laws prevent the media from making unfounded allegations against individuals; • laws are needed to prevent the unfair and discriminatory treatment of such groups as ethnic minorities, homosexuals, women etc; • the watershed for TV prevents some sex, violence, swearing and drug use being shown before 9pm, again to prevent children from viewing unsuitable material; • in a democracy, propaganda should not be allowed, allowing instead ‘due impartiality’ that gives a much fairer and more balanced picture; • the hypodermic model of media effects says that the audience copy what they see / hear therefore media content needs to be controlled in order to protect the public; • postmodernists believe with the advent of new media we now live in a media saturated society therefore the possibility of the media influencing the audience is amplified (social media, fake news, cyberbullying, cyberterrorism etc.) – increasing the need for content to be controlled; • other reasonable response. Band 0 [0 marks] No creditworthy response Band 1 [1–3 marks] Answers in this band will show only a limited awareness of the question. Responses may be short and un / underdeveloped. For example, ‘obscene materials and violence should not be shown in the media’. At the bottom of the band (1 mark), expect one weak point. Higher in the band (2–3 marks), candidates may offer more than one weak point, but there may be a tendency towards simplistic answers, engaging with sociological ideas without using sociological language. Band 2 [4–6 marks] A clear and accurate explanation, showing good sociological knowledge and understanding of the question. Sociological terms and concepts should be expected. For example, ‘the watershed on TV protects children from inappropriate material such as bad language and swearing which children might copy’. This would be followed by explanation of factors leading to this. At the bottom of the band, the range of points covered may be narrow or lack detail. Higher in the band, answers will cover more than one factor in a well- developed way or cover several factors in less detail. 4(d) Band 3 [7–8 marks] Answers in this band will show good sociological knowledge and understanding of the question. For example, ‘laws are required to keep the country safe, particularly in times of war and conflict. There are acts in place such as The Official Secrets Act and the D Notice which ensure that material that could harm the nation is not allowed to be shown.’ They can then expand on the explanation of this and other factors as necessary. Sociological terms and concepts will be used accurately overall. Answers will be well focused on the question and there will be a range of reasons presented. At the top of the band explanations will be clear throughout. 4(e) To what extent are representations of age in the media stereotypical? 15 Candidates should show awareness of the ways that media representations of age are stereotypical and are likely to refer to examples of this. They may talk about such age groups as children, youth, adults and the elderly in their answer. To evaluate, candidates could consider how media representations of age are changing and are no longer stereotypical . Different forms of media may be referred to here e.g. traditional ‘vs’ new media. Possible answers: For: • stereotypes of age are frequently used in the media to attract a mass audience as they are easy to understand and so are used regularly; • children – typically represented as innocent and vulnerable e.g. in advertising; • teenagers are typically shown as rebellious and irresponsible e.g. the coverage of the Mods and the Rockers (Cohen); • teenagers are often shown as folk devils in a moral panic e.g. Fawbert’s ‘hoodies’ study saw teenagers as a threat to society; • middle aged people are often shown as responsible and law-abiding figures of authority; • middle aged people are often shown as being boring with no sense of fun; • older people may be stereotyped as vulnerable, weak and a burden to society; • other reasonable response. Against: • new media starts to challenge traditional stereotypes and introduces newer and less rigid representations of age; • social media allows people to create their own identities and representations through user generated content and citizen journalism; • children can also be represented as having greater wisdom than adults, dealing with complex and sensitive issues themselves; • children / teens today may be sexualized in the media e.g. Postman’s study on childhood; • teenagers can also be represented positively e.g. in the Harry Potter films; • middle aged people can be shown to be throwing off their air of respectability e.g. a mid-life crisis, having an affair, selling their material assets and going travelling etc; • older people can be shown positively as wise and caring characters; • older actors / actresses are challenging their representations of being ‘past it’ e.g. Helen Mirren; • the spending power of the older generation means that representations of this age group in advertising are changing in order to maximise profits (the grey pound); • postmodernists believe that in the ‘mix and match’ society we now live in, age is just a number and therefore representations of age are diverse and fluid; • other reasonable response 4(e) Band 0 [0 marks] No creditworthy response Band 1 [1–4 marks] Answers in this band will be vague and largely based on common sense showing limited knowledge of the extent of the question. Use of sociological terms or concepts is very unlikely. Responses may be short, undeveloped and one-sided. For example, ‘old people are shown to be grumpy in the media’. Lower in the band (1–2 marks), expect one or two weak points. Higher in the band (3–4 marks) candidates may offer more than two points or provide a weak definition of key terms. Band 2 [5–8 marks] In this band candidates will show some basic knowledge of the extent of the question. Alternatively, they may offer an answer which is list-like in nature but there will be no real attempt to assess the issues raised by the question. There may be limited / some use of sociological terms or concepts. Responses may be underdeveloped and lack range. Answers may be simplistic and two-sided responses are unlikely. For example, ‘sociological studies show that teenagers are often represented negatively in the media, as ‘thugs’ or deviants for example’. Lower in the band, the response will be rather narrow in the points covered and there will be little development. Higher in the band, more points will be covered and there will be limited development of some points. Alternatively, a list-like answer with little development covering both sides of the argument may score up to 8 marks. A one-sided answer cannot score higher than 8 marks. Band 3 [9–12 marks] Answers in this band will show good sociological knowledge and understanding of the extent of the debate in the question. Sociological terms and concepts will be used with greater accuracy and/or frequency. For the most part, answers will be well developed, focused on the question and there will be a range of points presented. For example, ‘age representations of the young and the old remain stereotypical in the media. However, there are some changes occurring. Due to allegations of ageism in the film industry, we are starting to see older people taking more active roles, as action heroes for example. Postmodernists believe this is typical of the ‘mix and match’ generation in which we now live’. There will be a two-sided response but this may be unbalanced. At the bottom of the band, candidates may provide a narrower range of well- developed points. At the top of the band, expect a wider range of points and clear focus on the question. 4(e) Band 4 [13–15 marks] Answers in this band will show excellent knowledge and understanding of the extent to which age representations in the media are stereotypical. There will be a strong grasp of the argument as well as accurate and frequent use of sociological terms and concepts. Answers will be well developed, clearly focused on the question and discuss a wide range of points. Responses will be two-sided and balanced. At the bottom of the band (13 marks), the answer may lack a specific conclusion. Higher in the band, there will be a clear attempt to offer an assessment of the ‘To what extent.?’ part of the question through a focused conclusion. Candidates should show consideration of points for and against the debate, citing some of the examples given.
2 Some sociologists view education and the official curriculum as essential to improving an individual’s life chances. Other sociologists believe education maintains social inequalities. Whilst every school is different they all operate a system of rules and rewards for students. (a) What is meant by the term ‘official curriculum’? [2] (b) Describe two features of the hidden curriculum. [4] (c) Explain how schools have tried to improve the educational achievement of ethnic minority students. [6] (d) Explain why sanctions are used in schools. [8] (e) To what extent is education a major factor in improving an individual's life chances? [15] Section C: Crime, deviance and social control
35 marks
Mark scheme: 2(a) What is meant by the term ‘official curriculum’. 2 One mark for partial definition e.g. subjects studied Two marks for clear definition e.g. the subjects and lessons studied at school and their content 2(b) Describe two features of the hidden curriculum. 4 Possible answers: • competitive sports and testing – sends out the message that doing better than others is valued in society; • learning the importance of punctuality in school, preparing you for later working life; • through school uniform requirements, students learn expectations for dress codes e.g. at work; • abiding by school rules – you have to do as you’re told by those in authority regardless of whether you agree; • schools are hierarchies – students learn their place in the hierarchy and the associated norms with this status position; • functionalists – hidden curriculum gives the skills and attitudes necessary for the smooth running of society, social order; • Marxists – hidden curriculum maintains the control of the working class by the bourgeoisie; • feminists – students learn the expectations associated with their gender and their future gender roles; • respect and manners and reinforced to students through the hidden curriculum; • values and morals of society are taught and reinforced through the hidden curriculum; • other reasonable response. One mark for each point correctly identified (up to maximum of two). One mark for each point that is developed (up to a maximum of two) 2(c) Explain how schools have tried to improve the educational 6 achievement of ethnic minority students. Candidates may talk about ethnic minority students in general terms or may focus on specific ethnic groups in their answer. Either way is fine to credit. Possible answers: • anti-racism programmes – teachers have been trained in equal opportunities and the need to change their expectations and stereotypes of ethnic minority students; • legislation now exists to ensure that ethnic minority students get a ‘fair deal’ in education; • curriculums are far less ethnocentric in nature today and thus ethnic minority students are far more likely to engage and be successful; • representations of ethnic minority students in textbooks are more regular and frequent meaning that education is seen to be something for everyone; • positive discrimination – schools can place ethnic minority students into higher sets and introduce compensatory education programmes/intervention in order to try and improve performance; • recruitment of more ethnic minority teachers can help ethnic minority students to see that education is something that they can be successful in – positive role modelling; • other reasonable response. Band 0 [0 marks] No creditworthy response Band 1 [1–3 marks] Answers in this band will show only a limited awareness of the question and may talk about ‘not being racist and treating ethnic minority students equally’. Responses may be short and un/underdeveloped. At the bottom of the band (1 mark), expect one weak point. Higher in the band (2–3 marks), candidates may offer more than one weak point, but there may be a tendency towards simplistic answers, engaging with sociological ideas without using sociological language. Band 2 [4–6 marks] A clear and accurate explanation, showing good sociological knowledge and understanding of the question. Sociological terms and concepts should be expected e.g. ‘positive discrimination can be used to try and improve the educational achievement of ethnic minority students. This can involve additional tuition, a non-ethnocentric curriculum, placing EM students into higher sets and bringing in motivational speakers’. This would be followed by explanation of factors leading to this. At the bottom of the band, the range of points covered may be narrow or lack detail. Higher in the band, answers will cover more than one factor in a well-developed way or cover several factors in less detail. 2(d) Explain why sanctions are used in schools. 8 Candidates should show awareness of the various reasons why sanctions (positive rewards and/or negative punishments may be discussed) are used in schools. Possible answers: • negative sanctions such as detentions are used in schools in order to promote conformity; • punishments in schools are used to teach individuals that certain behaviours are ‘wrong’ and should not be repeated; • positive sanctions such as treat trips are used in schools to encourage students to engage in and repeat socially encouraged behaviour; • functionalists believe sanctions in schools are necessary as one of the functions of education is social control – to produce social stability; • feminists believe sanctions are used in schools to maintain patriarchy in terms of gender roles and gender expectations in behaviour and attitudes; • Marxists believe sanctions are used in schools to allow the promotion of the belief that it is ‘natural’ to conform to the wishes of those in positions of authority and power; • sanctions in schools could be seen to be an extension of the power of the state to ideologically control individuals (Marxism) through the promotion of socially approved attitudes, beliefs and behaviour that benefit the ruling class; • Marxists believe sanctions in schools allow the promotion of the capitalist ideology as something that is fair and just; • prizes and rewards are used as positive sanctions in order to raise attainment; • other reasonable response. Band 0[ 0 marks] No creditworthy response Band 1 [1–3 marks] Answers in this band will show only a limited awareness of the question. A tendency to description is likely. Responses may be short and undeveloped e.g. ‘to punish students’. Sociological terms and concepts are unlikely to be used. At the bottom of the band (1 mark), expect one weak point. Higher in the band (2–3 marks), candidates may offer more than one weak point. Band 2 [4–6 marks] Answers in this band will show basic sociological knowledge and understanding of why sanctions are used in schools. Responses may be underdeveloped and lacking in range e.g. ‘sanctions can be punishments or rewards and they make students do what they are told, so acting as a type of social control’. At the bottom of the band, candidates are unlikely to use sociological terms and concepts accurately. Higher in the band, candidates may be beginning to use sociological terms and concepts with greater accuracy. However, some aspects of the answer may only be partially developed/explained. 2(d) Band 3 [7–8 marks] Answers in this band will show good sociological knowledge and understanding of why sanctions are used in schools and will be well developed and explained e.g. ‘Sanctions in school ensure conformity to the roles and to those in positions of authority. For functionalists this is a good thing as it socialises us to accept orders from others and so keeps society running smoothly. For Marxists, though, it allows the ruling class to maintain power over the lower class’. They can then expand on the explanation of this and other factors as necessary. Sociological terms and concepts will be used accurately overall. Answers will be well focused on the question and there will be a range of reasons presented. At the top of the band explanations will be clear throughout. 2(e) To what extent is education a major factor in improving an individual’s 15 life chances? Life Chances – the opportunities that individuals have to improve their lives. Candidates should show awareness of the ways that education can improve a person’s life chances and should also consider how life chances are already fixed and cannot be changed by education. Factors to do with ethnicity, gender and social class may be referred to here. Possible answers: For: • functionalists see education as being meritocratic and so by working hard you will be successful and will improve your life chances; • educational qualifications are seen in MIS’s as being vital in order to obtain professional and high status jobs; • higher education is thought to be a major factor in determining the type and level of job a person can obtain – this then can be life changing; • education is thought to lead to social mobility, offering individuals the opportunity to change their social status and lifestyle; • education is free for children in many countries and so opens doors for everybody in terms of increasing life chances; • education may lead to improved and widened social networks which may heighten job opportunities and prospects; • education can lift poor people out of poverty and break the cycle; • education allows for equality of opportunity regardless of a person’s social characteristics (gender/ethnicity/social class); • compensatory education and/or positive discrimination can improve the life chances of disadvantaged groups; • the teaching of the hidden curriculum promotes life skills and ensures that students know the expected norms and values in order to function successfully and so improves life chances; • other reasonable response. Against: • those with more money have better chances of being successful in education than poorer people e.g. through private education, which then affects life chances; • despite girls performing better than boys in education in many societies, when it comes to life chances, males still fare better e.g. the gender pay gap; • ethnic minorities do not do as well in education as the ethnic majority and therefore do not have improved life chances; • Marxists do not believe that education is meritocratic and instead see it as an institution that maintains social inequalities and thus does not change life chances as it is a tool to keep the working class in their place; • feminists believe that patriarchal ideologies are so ingrained in society that educational performance is irrelevant in determining life chances; 2(e) • life chances may be fixed and ascribed by social characteristics and so education cannot affect life chances (ascribed status); • other social agents e.g. the peer group may be more influential than education in terms of improving life chances; • other reasonable response Band 0 [0 marks] No creditworthy response Band 1 [1–4 marks] Answers in this band will be vague and largely based on common sense showing limited knowledge of the extent of the debate in the question. Use of sociological terms or concepts is very unlikely. Responses may be short, undeveloped and one-sided e.g. ‘qualifications help you get a good job’. Lower in the band (1–2 marks), expect one or two weak points. Higher in the band (3–4 marks) candidates may offer more than two points or provide a weak definition of key terms, e.g. ‘life chances are the opportunities you have to succeed’. Band 2 [5–8 marks] In this band candidates will show some basic knowledge of the extent of the debate in the question. Alternatively, they may offer an answer which is list- like in nature but there will be no real attempt to assess the issues raised by the question. There may be limited/some use of sociological terms or concepts. Responses may be underdeveloped and lack range. Answers may be simplistic and two-sided responses are unlikely e.g. ‘education is often free and available to everyone so if you do well in it you have more chances to improve your status’. Lower in the band, the response will be rather narrow in the points covered and there will be little development. Higher in the band, more points will be covered and there will be limited development of some points. Alternatively, a list-like answer with little development covering both sides of the argument may score up to 8 marks. A one-sided answer cannot score higher than 8 marks. Band 3 [9–12 marks] Answers in this band will show good sociological knowledge and understanding of the extent of the debate in the question. Sociological terms and concepts will be used with greater accuracy and/or frequency. For the most part, answers will be well developed, focused on the question and there will be a range of points presented. Candidates may say that, for example, ‘whilst functionalists believe that education is a meritocratic system, that allows everyone to better themselves if they work and try hard, it remains the case that most people will remain in the class or status position into which they were born. This shows that education has little effect on life chances’. There will be a two-sided response but this may be unbalanced. At the bottom of the band, candidates may provide a narrower range of well-developed points. At the top of the band, expect a wider range of points and clear focus on the question.
3 According to official crime statistics an individual’s social characteristics can affect whether they become a criminal. Some sociologists believe that ethnic minority groups and the lower classes have higher conviction rates due to agencies such as the police and the media. Trends in crime also vary depending on the crime committed, for example whether it is internet crime, green crime or white-collar crime. (a) What is meant by the term ‘internet crime’? [2] (b) Describe two criminal sub-cultures. [4] (c) Explain how the police can cause deviancy amplification. [6] (d) Explain why effective socialisation can reduce crime. [8] (e) To what extent is ethnicity the most important factor in determining whether an individual commits crime? [15] Section D: Media
35 marks
Mark scheme: 3(a) What is meant by the term ‘internet crime’? 2 One mark for partial definition e.g. fraud Two marks for clear definition e.g. illegal act using the web, often referred to as a cybercrime, e.g. identity theft 3(b) Describe two criminal sub-cultures 4 Local examples may well be seen here – these should be duly credited. Possible answers: • gangs e.g. a group of people who use violence and intimidation to commit crime; • mafia – a highly organised criminal sub-culture, often involved in violent crime; • drug dealers – money is made through the illegal drugs trade; • youth sub-cultures such as the Skinheads who engaged in criminal behaviour; • Cloward and Ohlin – illegitimate opportunity structure – successful criminal role models exist in a community to train others to be successful criminals; • sub-cultures on the internet that commit crime e.g. the dark net, terrorist groups etc.; • other reasonable response. One mark for each point correctly identified (up to maximum of two). One mark for each point that is developed (up to a maximum of two) 3(c) Explain how the police can cause deviancy amplification. 6 Deviancy Amplification – when responses to crime and/or deviance by the police lead to greater deviance occurring in society. Possible answers: • police stereotypes and labels of criminals means that some people are more likely to be the subject of police scrutiny than others and this can lead to increased deviance as a response (self-fulfilling prophecy); • police targeting – certain areas are targeted and focused on by the police and thus some groups of people are more likely to be arrested than others – this can lead to anger and frustration and thus increased levels of deviance; • moral panics – such as the Mods and Rockers (Cohen) have shown how the actions of the police can lead to increased levels of deviance amongst the targeted groups of people; • stop and search rates – these are higher for some social groups than others and this can lead to accusations of police bias/riots; • institutional racism and the canteen culture – the police are sometimes accused of racist behaviour and this can then lead to angry retaliation and thus deviancy amplification e.g. rioting; • Jock Young’s study ‘The Drugtakers’, found that police actions and stereotypes led to more illegal drug taking behaviour and so increased the problem; • other reasonable response. Band 0 [0 marks] No creditworthy response Band 1 [1–3 marks] Answers in this band will show only a limited awareness of the question and may talk about e.g. ‘police treat some criminals badly and so others get involved in criminal behaviour’. Responses may be short and un/underdeveloped. At the bottom of the band (1 mark), expect one weak point. Higher in the band (2–3 marks), candidates may offer more than one weak point, but there may be a tendency towards simplistic answers, engaging with sociological ideas without using sociological language. Band 2 [4–6 marks] A clear and accurate explanation, showing good sociological knowledge and understanding of the question. Sociological terms and concepts should be expected e.g. ‘police targeting of powerless groups in society through increased surveillance and high stop and search rates is one reason. The reactions of these groups are unlikely to be positive and may result in feelings of marginalisation and frustration that lead to increased levels of deviance. The London Riots could be one such example of this’. This would be followed by explanation of factors leading to this. At the bottom of the band, the range of points covered may be narrow or lack detail. Higher in the band, answers will cover more than one factor in a well-developed way or cover several factors in less detail. 3(d) Explain why effective socialisation can reduce crime. 8 Candidates should show awareness of the various reasons why effective socialisation can reduce crime. Answers are likely to focus on the family but other factors can also be used. Possible answers: • the media can inform people that deviant behaviour will be punished and encourage shared feelings about what is right and wrong through its representations and content; • religion helps to shape morality and, through rules about behaviour and conduct, encourages us to act in a non-criminal way; • peer group – positive peer pressure can help to reduce crime as we want to ‘fit in’; • the family teaches and reinforces norms and values in the primary stage and is thought by many to be the bedrock of determining whether an individual commits crime; • education encourages individuals to work hard and to expect to work hard in a job in the future, criminality is highly disapproved of as an ‘easy option’; • the workplace can be a big deterrent to committing crime as people do not want to lose their job and the status and/or financial rewards and security it brings; • informal social control uses both negative and positive sanctions to encourage individuals to internalise society’s norms and values and to conform to these – this can reduce crime; • other reasonable response. Band 0 [0 marks] No creditworthy response Band 1 [1–3 marks] Answers in this band will show only a limited awareness of the question. A tendency to description is likely. Responses may be short and undeveloped e.g. ‘someone might be afraid of what their family would say’. Sociological terms and concepts are unlikely to be used. At the bottom of the band (1 mark), expect one weak point. Higher in the band (2–3 marks), candidates may offer more than one weak point. Band 2 [4–6 marks] Answers in this band will show basic sociological knowledge and understanding of why effective socialisation can reduce levels of offending. Responses may be underdeveloped and lacking in range e.g. ‘religion teaches that crime is wrong, is not moral and that it will be punished. This encourages people not to commit crime’. At the bottom of the band, candidates are unlikely to use sociological terms and concepts accurately. Higher in the band, candidates may be beginning to use sociological terms and concepts with greater accuracy. However, some aspects of the answer may only be partially developed/explained. 3(d) Band 3 [7–8 marks] Answers in this band will show good sociological knowledge and understanding of why effective socialisation can reduce levels of offending and will be well developed and explained e.g. ‘all of the agencies of socialisation work together to teach and reinforce right and wrong behaviour in society. Crime is seen to be wrong and is therefore discouraged through a series of positive and negative sanctions’. They can then expand on the explanation of this and other factors as necessary. Sociological terms and concepts will be used accurately overall. Answers will be well focused on the question and there will be a range of reasons presented. At the top of the band explanations will be clear throughout. 3(e) To what extent is ethnicity the most important factor in determining 15 whether an individual commits crime? Candidates should show awareness of the ways that ethnicity is an important factor in determining whether a person commits crime. In evaluation they may consider other social factors such as class, age and gender that may also affect whether an individual commits crime. Ethnicity may be considered as a generic social group or more specific examples of ethnic minorities may be discussed by the candidate e.g. Afro- Caribbean, Pakistani etc. NB: Remember that points can be used for or against the question, depending on the candidate’s explanation. For example, institutional racism could be used to say that ethnicity is an important factor as ethnic minorities perceive it to be unjust and unfair, or it could be used to argue that it’s not ethnicity but police behaviour and perceptions that causes an individual to commit crime. Possible answers: For: • ethnic minorities are also often located within the lower classes/have higher unemployment rates and so may suffer from material deprivation that can lead to crime; • most crime is committed by young people and ethnic minorities have a higher proportion of young people than the majority group hence higher crime rates; • marginalisation may cause ethnic minorities to commit crime as they do not have the same legitimate opportunities for success as the ethnic majority and feel socially excluded; • racism may lead to crime through disillusionment at the unfairness and therefore the rejection of society’s norms and values e.g. law abiding behaviour; • resistance to racism/status frustration may lead to crime as ethnic minorities become angry and frustrated at the way they are treated and so turn to rioting, protesting in response; • ethnic minorities maybe more likely to be involved in gang/street behaviour and so see criminality as a ‘normal’ part of life – street culture; • differential socialisation in terms of ethnicity may determine whether a person commits crime; • ethnicity may lead to crime due to labelling from the police/media which can then lead to a self-fulfilling prophecy and a master status being formed (e.g. Stuart Hall study ‘mugging’); • other reasonable response. 3(e) Against: • ethnic minorities may be subject to institutional racism by the police and the courts and so may just be more likely to be searched, arrested and convicted than the ethnic majority; • victims of crime may be biased and so may be more likely to report crimes committed by ethnic minorities; • police resources typically focus on street crime/urban areas which ethnic minorities are more likely to be involved in rather than hidden corporate or white-collar crime; • gender may be more important than ethnicity in terms of crime e.g. the culture of masculinity, social control of females etc.; • age maybe more important than ethnicity in determining crime rates e.g. low offending rates of the older generation; • social class maybe more important than ethnicity in determining crime rates due to relative deprivation, lack of educational success and unemployment in the lower classes; • most ethnic minority members do not commit crime; • high hidden/dark figure of ethnic majority crime may mean that the OCS’s are misleading; • other reasonable response. Band 0 [0 marks] No creditworthy response Band 1 [1–4 marks] Answers in this band will be vague and largely based on common sense showing limited knowledge of the extent of the debate in the question. Use of sociological terms or concepts is very unlikely. Responses may be short, undeveloped and one-sided e.g. ‘the OCS show that ethnic minorities commit the most crime’. Lower in the band (1–2 marks), expect one or two weak points. Higher in the band (3–4 marks) candidates may offer more than two points or provide a weak definition of key terms e.g. ‘ethnicity is a person’s race’. Band 2 [5–8 marks] In this band candidates will show some basic knowledge of the extent of the debate in the question. Alternatively, they may offer an answer which is list- like in nature but there will be no real attempt to assess the issues raised by the question. There may be limited/some use of sociological terms or concepts. Responses may be underdeveloped and lack range. Answers may be simplistic and two-sided responses are unlikely e.g. ‘ethnic minorities are often poor and so they may commit crime for money’. Lower in the band, the response will be rather narrow in the points covered and there will be little development. Higher in the band, more points will be covered and there will be limited development of some points. Alternatively, a list-like answer with little development covering both sides of the argument may score up to 8 marks. A one-sided answer cannot score higher than 8 marks. 3(e) Band 3 [9–12 marks] Answers in this band will show good sociological knowledge and understanding of the extent of the debate in the question. Sociological terms and concepts will be used with greater accuracy and/or frequency. For the most part, answers will be well developed, focused on the question and there will be a range of points presented. Candidates may say that, for example, ‘the OCS does not give the full picture when it comes to ethnic minority crime and it may be that this only appears high because of police targeting areas where ethnic minorities live. They are then more likely to be stopped and searched and arrested resulting in a hidden figure of ethnic majority crime’. There will be a two-sided response but this may be unbalanced. At the bottom of the band, candidates may provide a narrower range of well-developed points. At the top of the band, expect a wider range of points and clear focus on the question. Band 4 [13–15 marks] Answers in this band will show excellent knowledge and understanding of the extent of the debate in the question. There will be a strong grasp of the argument as well as accurate and frequent use of sociological terms and concepts. Answers will be well developed, clearly focused on the question and discuss a wide range of points. Responses will be two-sided and balanced. At the bottom of the band (13 marks), the answer may lack a specific conclusion. Higher in the band, there will be a clear attempt to offer an assessment of the ‘To what extent.?’ part of the question through a focused conclusion. Candidates should show consideration of points for and against the debate in the question, citing some of the examples given.
4 In the past media owners and professionals were criticised for creating folk devils. Today new media have given more power and control to the audience and media is starting to change.This may affect how the audience use and interpret media content. (a) What is meant by the term ‘folk devils’? [2] (b) Describe two types of new media. [4] (c) Explain how diversification occurs in today’s media industry. [6] (d) Explain why the uses and gratifications model of media effects can be criticised. [8] (e) To what extent do media professionals such as editors and journalists control media content? [15]
35 marks
Mark scheme: 4(a) What is meant by the term ‘folk devils’? 2 One mark for partial definition e.g. bad people in the media Two marks for clear definition e.g. a group who are presented as scapegoats in a moral panic 4(b) Describe two types of new media. 4 New Media – technologies that are usually digital and involve greater interactivity for the audience plus on-demand access. Examples may be seen and credited here. Possible answers: • websites e.g. for a music magazine; • forums/chat rooms/message boards; • social networking sites e.g. facebook, Twitter etc.; • instant messaging and email via multiple platforms and technologies; • blogging/vlogging where content is created and commented on by the audience; • video-sharing websites such as Youtube, user generated content; • hardware e.g. smartphones, smart TVs that allow for convergence; • other reasonable response. One mark for each point correctly identified (up to maximum of two). One mark for each point that is developed (up to a maximum of two) 4(c) Explain how diversification occurs in today’s media industry. 6 Diversification – when media corporations extend their activities into different areas. Candidates are likely to use examples in their answers to support the points made. Note: pay close attention to what the candidate is saying here as some are confusing diversification with diversity – such answers are unlikely to be creditworthy. Possible answers: • media corporations extend their interests into other media areas e.g. News Corporation, Disney, Amazon to increase their stronghold on a market; • media corporations extend their interests into other non-media areas e.g. Virgin (music, money, travel etc.) and so become more powerful; • diversification occurs to produce greater profits for a company therefore is frequently seen today; • diversification can enable the spread of a particular set of messages, values and ideologies across a range of different platforms e.g. propaganda, bias etc.; • diversification can be seen as a means of reducing/spreading the risk in the media industry by having assets in more areas; • other reasonable response. Band 0 [0 marks] No creditworthy response Band 1 [1–3 marks] Answers in this band will show only a limited awareness of the question and may talk about ‘media companies spreading out into different areas’. Responses may be short and un/underdeveloped. At the bottom of the band (1 mark), expect one weak point. Higher in the band (2–3 marks), candidates may offer more than one weak point, but there may be a tendency towards simplistic answers, engaging with sociological ideas without using sociological language. Band 2 [4–6 marks] A clear and accurate explanation, showing good sociological knowledge and understanding of the question. Sociological terms and concepts should be expected e.g. ‘diversification is where a media company such as Murdoch’s News International expands into different areas. This results in the company having greater control over media content and being a more powerful and influential institution. Profits are also increased as the company becomes a media corporation’. This would be followed by explanation of factors leading to this. At the bottom of the band, the range of points covered may be narrow or lack detail. Higher in the band, answers will cover more than one factor in a well-developed way or cover several factors in less detail. 4(d) Explain why the uses and gratifications model of media effects can be 8 criticised. Candidates should show awareness of the various reasons why the UAG model of media effects can be criticised. This could be generally or could focus on specific aspects of the model e.g. personal identity. Other media effects theories may be used to criticise it but this is not essential. Possible answers: • the UAG model only looks at how people use the media, it does not look at the messages that the media transmits; • the UAG model overlooks how the social context of audiences such as ethnic groups, social class, gender and age influences how different social groups use the media differently; • new media is far more interactive than traditional media and so offers new ways for how the audience use the media – the UAG model doesn’t account for this; • UAG model ignores the fact that the audience can only consume what media products are on offer to choose from – therefore the media industry still has power over the audience; • the UAG model suggests that there are only four main ways that the audience use the media – there is likely to be far more than this; • candidates may refer to another media effects model e.g. hypodermic needle/cultural effects in order to criticise the UAG model e.g. hypodermic needle model would say that the audience are affected by the media rather than the audience controlling the effects of the media – media violence leading to copycat killings; • candidates may specifically criticise the four media uses that the theory identifies (more than one point could be made from this) – entertainment, personal relationships, information and personal identity (other names for the four uses may be seen e.g. escapism rather than entertainment, obviously =this is fine to credit); • other reasonable response. Band 0 [0 marks] No creditworthy response Band 1 [1–3 marks] Answers in this band will show only a limited awareness of the question. A tendency to description is likely. Responses may be short and undeveloped e.g. ‘UAG model isn’t really about new media’. Sociological terms and concepts are unlikely to be used. At the bottom of the band (1 mark), expect one weak point. Higher in the band (2–3 marks), candidates may offer more than one weak point. 4(d) Band 2 [4–6 marks] Answers in this band will show basic sociological knowledge and understanding of why the UAG model of media effects can be criticised. Responses may be underdeveloped and lacking in range e.g. ‘the UAG model says that people use the media for different things but it doesn’t consider the powerful messages that the media can transmit such as advertising and propaganda’. At the bottom of the band, candidates are unlikely to use sociological terms and concepts accurately. Higher in the band, candidates may be beginning to use sociological terms and concepts with greater accuracy. However, some aspects of the answer may only be partially developed/explained. Band 3 [7–8 marks] Answers in this band will show good sociological knowledge and understanding of why the UAG model of media effects can be criticised and will be well developed and explained e.g. ‘because the UAG model attempted to explain how the audience used traditional media, it doesn’t consider the huge changes in the industry since the advent of new media. The digital and global nature of the industry and products today means that the audience are far more interactive than ever before and so are finding new ways to use the media which had never been considered by UAG’. They can then expand on the explanation of this and other factors as necessary. Sociological terms and concepts will be used accurately overall. Answers will be well focused on the question and there will be a range of reasons presented. At the top of the band explanations will be clear throughout. 4(e) To what extent do media professionals such as editors and journalists 15 control media content? Media Professionals – editors, journalists, directors, producers etc. Candidates should show awareness of the ways that various media professionals can control the content of the media. Candidates may talk about traditional and new media in their answer. In evaluation, candidates could consider other controls over the content of the media apart from media professionals e.g. the audience, the state, media owners etc. Possible answers: For: • media professionals make decisions about what the audience are allowed to consume – they effectively set the agenda; • news values (as determined by media professionals) determine the content of the news e.g. human interest stories, natural disasters, murder etc.; • editing and cutting decisions drastically affect the content of the media and these decisions are made by media professionals; • GUMG (Glasgow University Media Group) discovered that the news took a conservative stance in its reporting and it was the media professionals that created this bias; • media professionals are thought to share similar backgrounds (e.g. white, male, middle aged and middle class) and so create a media world view that is very conservative, homogenous and non- confrontational; • media professionals are employed by other people (boss) therefore they will ensure that media content reflects the wishes of their employers, otherwise they may lose their job; • media professionals make the day-to-day decisions regarding time and space available in the media and so determine its content; • gatekeepers decide what to select and what to discard and this therefore determines media content; • other reasonable response. Against: • in many countries it is the state that controls the content of the media through public service broadcasting and propaganda; • it is not media professionals but large media corporations that control the content of the media through their huge brands e.g. Disney; • it is advertisers, not media professionals, who control the content of the media as the media industry needs to pander to the advertisers in order to raise revenue; • government censorship controls the content of the media through legislation such as the Official Secrets Act, laws of libel etc.; • content of films is controlled through the certification system e.g. BBFC, gaming through PEGI etc.; 4(e) • new media means that it may be the audience who control the content of the media through UGC (user generated content) and citizen journalism; • the audience can be said to control content through their power as consumers – if they don’t like the content they won’t buy or consume it; • social media, blogs/vlogs and forums means that it is the audience who directly control media content not the professionals as they make it; • other reasonable response. Band 0 [0 marks] No creditworthy response Band 1 [1–4 marks] Answers in this band will be vague and largely based on common sense showing limited knowledge of the extent of the debate in the question. Use of sociological terms or concepts is very unlikely. Responses may be short, undeveloped and one-sided e.g. ‘they control content because they decide what to put into the media’. Lower in the band (1–2 marks), expect one or two weak points. Higher in the band (3–4 marks) candidates may offer more than two points or provide a weak definition of key terms e.g. ‘media professionals can be editors and journalists’. Band 2 [5–8 marks] In this band candidates will show some basic knowledge of the extent of the debate in the question. Alternatively, they may offer an answer which is list- like in nature but there will be no real attempt to assess the issues raised by the question. There may be limited/some use of sociological terms or concepts. Responses may be underdeveloped and lack range. Answers may be simplistic and two-sided responses are unlikely e.g. ‘news values means that some stories are thought to be more important than others – media professionals will use these to decide the content of the media’. Lower in the band, the response will be rather narrow in the points covered and there will be little development. Higher in the band, more points will be covered and there will be limited development of some points. Alternatively, a list-like answer with little development covering both sides of the argument may score up to 8 marks. A one-sided answer cannot score higher than 8 marks. 4(e) Band 3 [9–12 marks] Answers in this band will show good sociological knowledge and understanding of the extent of the debate in the question. Sociological terms and concepts will be used with greater accuracy and/or frequency. For the most part, answers will be well developed, focused on the question and there will be a range of points presented. Candidates may say that, for example, ‘despite media professionals clearly being involved in the day-to- day decisions regarding media content, they are not the only people to influence content. Media today is largely privately owned and therefore is set up to make a profit. To do so media needs to appeal to a mass audience in order to attract advertising revenue. It is economic factors such as this that determine content’. There will be a two-sided response but this may be unbalanced. At the bottom of the band, candidates may provide a narrower range of well-developed points. At the top of the band, expect a wider range of points and clear focus on the question. Band 4 [13–15 marks] Answers in this band will show excellent knowledge and understanding of the extent of the debate in the question. There will be a strong grasp of the argument as well as accurate and frequent use of sociological terms and concepts. Answers will be well developed, clearly focused on the question and discuss a wide range of points. Responses will be two-sided and balanced. At the bottom of the band (13 marks), the answer may lack a specific conclusion. Higher in the band, there will be a clear attempt to offer an assessment of the ‘To what extent.?’ part of the question through a focused conclusion. Candidates should show consideration of points for and against the debate in the question, citing some of the examples given.
3 Sociologists debate why an individual might take part in criminal and deviant behaviour. Some blame inadequate socialisation, others look at the process of labelling. What is interesting is that different social groups seem to have different levels of offending. For example, according to official statistics, young people commit more crime than older people. (a) What is meant by the term ‘labelling’? [2] (b) Describe two moral panics. [4] (c) Explain how crime and deviance can be different. [6] (d) Explain why some young people commit crime. [8] (e) To what extent does functionalist theory explain criminal behaviour? [15] Section D: Media
35 marks
Mark scheme: 3(a) What is meant by the term ‘labelling’? One mark for partial definition, e.g. a stereotype/tagging Two marks for clear definition, e.g. the way in which acts and individuals are defined and stereotyped e.g. as deviant/a criminal 2 3(b) Describe two moral panics. Candidates may describe classic moral panics based on sociological studies, contemporary examples or localised examples. All are fine to credit. Possible answers: • the mods and the rockers – Cohen – their deviant behaviour was exaggerated and sensationalised by the media; • the ‘hoodies’ – Fawbert – young people wearing hoodies were portrayed by the media as folk devils and so a moral panic ensued about their perceived deviant behaviour and attitudes; • lone parents – moral panics have ensued about the lack of a father figure leading to feral and undisciplined children with no respect for authority; • football hooligans – at certain periods in history these people have been presented in the media as mindless thugs, intent on causing trouble; • young people and gangs/street culture – the idea whipped up by the media that young people on the streets are up to no good, taking drugs, carrying knives and being delinquent; • illegal immigrants – often portrayed by the media to be criminal, amoral, dangerous and taking ‘our’ jobs; • stereotypical representations in the media that link Muslims with terrorism – Islamophobia; • Stuart Hall, ‘Policing the Crisis’ – this study of the moral panic of mugging saw the police arresting large numbers of black youths who were represented in the media as violent criminals; • video nasties – moral panics are often seen whereby media content is blamed for the delinquent behaviour of youths in society, e.g. ‘Grand Theft Auto’ video games blamed for youth copycat killings; • other reasonable response. One mark for each point correctly identified (up to maximum of two). One mark for each point that is developed (up to a maximum of two). 4 Question Answer Marks 3(c) Explain how crime and deviance can be different. Possible answers: • crime involves the breaking of the law, deviance is about not conforming to norms; • crime is typically more serious than deviance, e.g. murder vs. vandalism; • crime will involve formal agencies of social control in terms of surveillance and punishment, deviance is more likely to be dealt with informally; • crime is not always deviant (e.g. speeding) and deviance is not always criminal (e.g. burping at the dinner table); • deviance can include acts that will be positively sanctioned and rewarded (e.g. heroism), crime is seen to be negative; • other reasonable response. Band 0 [0 marks] No creditworthy response. Band 1 [1–3 marks] Answers in this band will show only a limited awareness of the question and may talk about ‘crime is more serious than deviance’. Responses may be short and un/underdeveloped. At the bottom of the band (1 mark), expect one weak point. Higher in the band (2–3 marks), candidates may offer more than one weak point, but there may be a tendency towards simplistic answers, engaging with sociological ideas without using sociological language. Band 2 [4–6 marks] A clear and accurate explanation, showing good sociological knowledge and understanding of the question. Sociological terms and concepts should be expected, e.g. ‘crime is regulated by the Government and is an act that breaks the law, e.g. murder. Deviance, however, need not be so serious. Instead, it may involve the breaking of norms, perhaps as youth resistance or rebellion in a sub-culture such as the punks’. This would be followed by explanation of factors leading to this. At the bottom of the band, the range of points covered may be narrow or lack detail. Higher in the band, answers will cover more than one factor in a well-developed way or cover several factors in less detail. 6 Question Answer Marks 3(d) Explain why some young people commit crime. Candidates should discuss the various reasons why young people commit crime. In awarding ‘any other reasonable response’, examiners must ensure that candidates are talking about youth crime rather than generic reasons for crime. Possible answers: • some offences by young people are status crimes – only illegal because of the age of the offender, e.g. drinking alcohol under age; • low levels of petty criminality are seen by some to be a ‘normal’ part of growing up during the extended period of adolescence – transition stage (Matza and Drift theory); • boredom – young people have a lot of leisure time and may commit acts of crime as a way of engaging in thrill seeking behaviour (edgework/Postmodernism); • peer pressure – young people spend a lot of time with their peers and want to fit in, in some peer groups this means committing crime, e.g. gang culture; • status frustration – some young people may commit crime in order to increase their low status in society (particularly males, ethnic minorities and the working class); • high youth unemployment and/or low pay amongst young people means that they may suffer from material and/or relative deprivation and so commit crime; • young people may be targeted by the police and therefore due to negative labels and a self-fulfilling prophecy commit crime, e.g. stop and search rates; • young people fit the stereotype of the typical criminal (Cicourel) and so are more likely to be arrested by the police which may lead to deviancy amplification and more crime being committed; • crime and its proceeds may be glamorised in the media and so encourage young people to commit it in order to achieve this kind of lifestyle, e.g. ‘gangsta rap’ culture; • other reasonable response. Band 0 [0 marks] No creditworthy response. 8 Question Answer Marks 3(d) Band 1 [1–3 marks] Answers in this band will show only a limited awareness of the question. A tendency to description is likely. Responses may be short and undeveloped, e.g. ‘young people may commit crime because they are bored’. Sociological terms and concepts are unlikely to be used. At the bottom of the band (1 mark), expect one weak point. Higher in the band (2–3 marks), candidates may offer more than one weak point. Band 2 [4–6 marks] Answers in this band will show basic sociological knowledge and understanding of why young people commit more crime than older people. Responses may be underdeveloped and lacking in range, e.g. ‘young people spend a lot of time with their peer group. This may lead to peer pressure which in turn can lead to crime being committed by younger people’. At the bottom of the band, candidates are unlikely to use sociological terms and concepts accurately. Higher in the band, candidates may be beginning to use sociological terms and concepts with greater accuracy. However, some aspects of the answer may only be partially developed/explained. Band 3 [7–8 marks] Answers in this band will show good sociological knowledge and understanding of why young people commit more crime than older people and will be well developed and explained, e.g. ‘young people are still forming their identities and are unsure of their position and status in society. This, coupled with high youth unemployment, may lead to what Cohen called “status frustration” amongst the young. If status cannot be achieved legitimately then they may turn to crime in order to achieve this, e.g. in gangs’. They can then expand on the explanation of this and other factors as necessary. Sociological terms and concepts will be used accurately overall. Answers will be well focused on the question and there will be a range of reasons presented. At the top of the band explanations will be clear throughout. Question Answer Marks 3(e) To what extent does functionalist theory explain criminal behaviour? Answers may include variations of functionalist theory such as Merton and strain, Hirschi and sub-cultural explanations such as Cohen’s status frustration. They may, in evaluation, discuss the problems with this theory as an adequate explanation for criminality and/or consider other explanations for crime. Possible answers: For: • for most people their collective conscience prevents crime but in times of stress people no longer feel integrated into society and so commit crime; • crime can act as a safety valve that keeps society strong, e.g. men visiting prostitutes can be seen as good for society as it allows them to find sexual release without splitting up a family; • crime can be seen as an indication that change in society is necessary – a warning function; • Cohen – status frustration – crime may occur when an individual has a lack of power and status in society. Committing crime maybe a way to gain this status, e.g. in a gang; • Merton’s strain theory – crime (anomie) may occur if there is a disparity between what individuals want in society and their ability to achieve it legitimately; • primary socialisation – this is thought to be crucial to ensure social conformity, if it isn’t done correctly then criminal behaviour can occur; • crime occurs when socialisation has not been effective and social bonds of attachment that that control criminal tendencies have not been developed (Hirschi); • Murray and the New Right believe crime is committed by a lawless and amoral underclass who have deviant norms and values, different to the mainstream; • other reasonable response. Against: • functionalist theory presumes the trends in the official crime statistics are correct and therefore ignores the dark figure of crime meaning their explanations for crime are incorrect; • Marxism – crime is caused by poverty, structural inequalities and material deprivation; • Left realism – crime is caused by relative deprivation and marginalisation/social exclusion from society; 15 Question Answer Marks 3(e) • feminism – crime is caused by a patriarchal society that legitimates male power and dominance, e.g. domestic violence, control of females; • men are encouraged to prove their masculinity to be seen as hegemonic (Connell) and crime is one way of doing so; • labelling theory – crime is caused by the police/media labelling of individuals/social groups as criminal and the self- fulfilling prophecy and the deviancy amplification that results from this; • postmodernism – crime is committed because it is enjoyable and is characterised by thrill seeking behaviour and edgework (Katz and Lyng); • crime is committed because there are no legitimate ways available for an individual to be successful, e.g. sub-cultural theory and the illegitimate opportunity structure (Cloward and Ohlin); • some people are born criminal – Lombroso’s biological theory; • other reasonable response. Band 0 [0 marks] No creditworthy response. Band 1 [1–4 marks] Answers in this band will be vague and largely based on common sense showing limited knowledge of the extent of the debate in the question. Use of sociological terms or concepts is very unlikely. Responses may be short, undeveloped and one-sided, e.g. ‘crime can show that society needs to change’. Lower in the band (1–2 marks), expect one or two weak points. Higher in the band (3–4 marks) candidates may offer more than two points or provide a weak definition of key terms, e.g. ‘functionalists think that some crime is good’. Band 2 [5–8 marks] In this band candidates will show some basic knowledge of the extent of the debate in the question. Alternatively, they may offer an answer which is list-like in nature but there will be no real attempt to assess the issues raised by the question. There may be limited/some use of sociological terms or concepts. Responses may be underdeveloped and lack range. Answers may be simplistic and two-sided responses are unlikely, e.g. ‘Merton says crime is committed because some people can’t get everything they want in society through education and paid work’. Lower in the band, the response will be rather narrow in the points covered and there will be little development. Higher in the band, more points will be covered and there will be limited development of some points. Alternatively, a list-like answer with little development covering both sides of the argument may score up to 8 marks. A one-sided answer cannot score higher than 8 marks. Question Answer Marks 3(e) Band 3 [9–12 marks] Answers in this band will show good sociological knowledge and understanding of the extent of the debate in the question. Sociological terms and concepts will be used with greater accuracy and/or frequency. For the most part, answers will be well developed, focused on the question and there will be a range of points presented. Candidates may say that, for example, ‘the functionalist explanation for crime presumes that the patterns and trends in the official criminal statistics about typical criminals and crimes are correct. This ignoring of the dark figure of crime means that their explanations do not focus on issues of power and inequality that are thought by many sociologists such as Marxists to be vital in adequately explaining crime. Marxists talk about material deprivation being a real reason for crime’. There will be a two-sided response but this may be unbalanced. At the bottom of the band, candidates may provide a narrower range of well-developed points. At the top of the band, expect a wider range of points and clear focus on the question. Band 4 [13–15 marks] Answers in this band will show excellent knowledge and understanding of the extent of the debate in the question. There will be a strong grasp of the argument as well as accurate and frequent use of sociological terms and concepts. Answers will be well developed, clearly focused on the question and discuss a wide range of points. Responses will be two-sided and balanced. At the bottom of the band (13 marks), the answer may lack a specific conclusion. Higher in the band, there will be a clear attempt to offer an assessment of the ‘To what extent?’ part of the question through a focused conclusion. Candidates should show consideration of points for and against the debate in the question, citing some of the examples given.
3 Does deprivation cause crime? This question is debated by sociologists and politicians who want to prevent anomie in society. However, due to the dark figure of crime it is difficult to claim that only one social factor causes crime. (a) What is meant by the term ‘anomie’? [2] (b) Describe two reasons for the dark figure of crime. [4] (c) Explain how crime can be committed using the internet. [6] (d) Explain why societies need prisons. [8] (e) To what extent is crime caused by deprivation? [15] Section D: Media
35 marks
Mark scheme: 3(a) What is meant by the term ‘anomie’? 2 One mark for partial definition, e.g. society has broken down ... is in chaos Two marks for clear definition, e.g. when the social bonds and shared values between society and individuals are broken ... normlessness 3(b) Describe two reasons for the dark figure of crime. 4 Possible answers: • not all crimes are known about, e.g. victimless crimes; • not all crimes are reported to the police, e.g. out of embarrassment/a feeling that nothing will be done/fear of reprisals, etc.; • sexual crimes are grossly under-reported due to the sensitive and somewhat taboo nature of these crimes; • not all crimes reported are recorded by the police – they may be perceived as being too petty or unlikely to be solved; • white-collar/corporate crimes are often dealt with by the company/business involved and so never make it into the crime statistics; • governments may massage the crime statistics so that they appear in a good light; • other reasonable response. One mark for each point correctly identified (up to maximum of two). One mark for each point that is developed (up to a maximum of two). 3(c) Explain how crime can be committed using the internet. 6 Possible answers: • cybercrimes – these are becoming more commonplace and include any crime involving the use of new digital technologies such as the internet; • examples of internet crime may be discussed such as fraud, identity theft, catfishing, internet scams, etc.; • cyberterrorism is a growing phenomenon whereby the internet is used for deliberate, widespread attacks on computers, e.g. hacking a Government website; • trade in illegal drugs and goods is thought to be aided by the internet which makes it easier for buyers and sellers to contact each other; • harassment through cyberstalking and cyberbullying is increasing as the internet provides anonymity to the criminal; • policing internet crimes is difficult because they cross national boundaries and/or are committed on the dark net; • criminals often have more specialist internet knowledge than the police or surveillance operations and thus can commit complex crimes that the authorities have little idea how to prevent; • digital piracy and illegal streaming of media entertainment occurs regularly and is almost impossible to control; • the dark web/dark net can be used to commit crime due to the lack of control and formal surveillance; • other reasonable response. Band 0 [0 marks] No creditworthy response Band 1 [1–3 marks] Answers in this band will show only a limited awareness of the question and may talk about examples of crimes that can be committed on the internet in a list-like manner, e.g. fraud, cybercrimes, etc. Responses may be short and un/under developed. At the bottom of the band (1 mark), expect one weak point. Higher in the band (2–3 marks), candidates may offer more than one weak point, but there may be a tendency towards simplistic answers, engaging with sociological ideas without using sociological language. Band 2 [4–6 marks] A clear and accurate explanation, showing good sociological knowledge and understanding of the question. Sociological terms and concepts should be expected, e.g. ‘globalisation means that many internet crimes cross national boundaries and so are hard to police. Different forces operate different policies with different priorities. Also the criminals are often more adept than the authorities at these cybercrimes as they involve the use of complex and specialist technologies. Cyberterrorism is one such crime’. This would be followed by explanation of factors leading to this. At the bottom of the band, the range of points covered may be narrow or lack detail. Higher in the band, answers will cover more than one factor in a well-developed way or cover several factors in less detail. 3(d) Explain why societies need prisons. 8 Possible answers: • prisons act as a formal agent of social control for society, maintaining social order; • incapacitation – prisons prevent offenders from committing more crimes; • deterrence – prisons deter both offenders and other members of society from committing crimes by making them aware of the consequences of offending; • rehabilitation – prisons offer courses, support and training facilities that can prevent the offender from committing further offences by changing their attitudes and behaviour; • prison offers a form of punishment and/or revenge by taking away a person’s freedom and making them pay for the crimes they have committed; • for functionalists prisons act as a sign to the population of what will happen if they step out of line and fail to conform to society’s norms and values – warning functions; • prisons lock dangerous criminals away and so protects society and individuals – keeps them safe; • a prison sentence allows victims to feel that justice has been served; • other reasonable response. Band 0 [0 marks] No creditworthy response Band 1 [1–3 marks] Answers in this band will show only a limited awareness of the question. A tendency to description is likely. Responses may be short and undeveloped, e.g. ‘they lock the bad people away’, stated without explanation. Sociological terms and concepts are unlikely to be used. At the bottom of the band (1 mark), expect one weak point. Higher in the band (2–3 marks), candidates may offer more than one weak point. Band 2 [4–6 marks] Answers in this band will show basic sociological knowledge and understanding of why societies need prisons. Responses may be underdeveloped and lacking in range, e.g. ‘prisons send out a warning signal to others in society about what will happen if they commit a crime’. At the bottom of the band, candidates are unlikely to use sociological terms and concepts accurately. Higher in the band, candidates may be beginning to use sociological terms and concepts with greater accuracy. However, some aspects of the answer may only be partially developed/explained. 3(d) Band [3–8 marks] Answers in this band will show good sociological knowledge and understanding of why societies need prisons and will be well developed and explained, e.g. ‘prisons aim to rehabilitate prisoners in order to make them better members of society. They do this through support programmes and training courses and so are essential for society’. They can then expand on the explanation of this and other factors as necessary. Sociological terms and concepts will be used accurately overall. Answers will be well focused on the question and there will be a range of reasons presented. At the top of the band explanations will be clear throughout. 3(e) To what extent is crime caused by deprivation? 15 Possible answers: For: • Marxism – inequalities caused by capitalism means that some people find themselves living in poverty, this may lead to crime; • events such as the London Riots 2011 saw those young people feeling excluded and marginalised from society committing crime (Lea and Young); • material deprivation – lacking desirable resources and money may lead some individuals to crime; • relative deprivation – when individuals or social groups see themselves as not having what others have crime may result; • Merton’s strain theory – the inability to achieve what others are achieving legitimately may lead some people into crime; • cultural deprivation – those deprived of a good upbringing (inadequate socialisation) may also turn to crime; • those deprived of the opportunities to gain educational qualifications and so to access the job ladder may turn to crime as a response; • Cohen – status frustration – those deprived of status in society may turn to crime as an alternative means of gaining their status; • according to the OCS (official crime statistics) most crimes are committed by those from the lower strata of society, i.e. the deprived; • other reasonable response. 3(e) Against: • deprivation cannot explain the crimes of the powerful, e.g. white-collar, corporate, green, etc.; • functionalists believe crime can be a good thing for society and that it is not linked to deprivation, e.g. a warning function; • postmodernists believe crime is committed as a release from boredom, a way to have fun by participating in ‘edgework’; • feminists believe that crime is committed to enable men to further dominate women in a patriarchal society; • Matza believes that crime is a normal part of growing up for young people from all social classes and backgrounds – it is not linked to deprivation; • expressive crimes are often committed for no financial gain and therefore cannot be linked to deprivation; • labelling theorists believe that crime is caused by giving someone a master status of ‘criminal’ through the creation of a self-fulfilling prophecy; • police targeting of certain social groups may lead to deviancy amplification through, for example, perceived institutional racism; • crime may be caused by peer pressure rather than deprivation, particularly for young people; • sub-cultural explanations for crime, e.g. Miller’s focal concerns, the illegitimate opportunity structure may be more appropriate than deprivation; • status frustration may be a more convincing explanation for crime than deprivation; • other reasonable response. Band 0 [0 marks] No creditworthy response. Band 1 [1–4 marks] Answers in this band will be vague and largely based on common sense showing limited knowledge of the extent of the question. Use of sociological terms or concepts is very unlikely. Responses may be short, undeveloped and one-sided, e.g. ‘people steal if they haven’t got enough money’. Lower in the band (1–2 marks), expect one or two weak points. Higher in the band (3–4 marks) candidates may offer more than two points or provide a weak definition of key terms, e.g. ‘deprivation means being poor’. 3(e) Band 2 [5–8 marks] In this band candidates will show some basic knowledge of the extent of the question. Alternatively, they may offer an answer which is list-like in nature but there will be no real attempt to assess the issues raised by the question. There may be limited/some use of sociological terms or concepts. Responses may be underdeveloped and lack range. Answers may be simplistic and two-sided responses are unlikely, e.g. ‘when someone realises they do not have the same as others they may turn to crime as a way of getting what they want’. Lower in the band, the response will be rather narrow in the points covered and there will be little development. Higher in the band, more points will be covered and there will be limited development of some points. Alternatively, a list-like answer with little development covering both sides of the argument may score up to 8 marks. A one-sided answer cannot score higher than 8 marks. Band 3 [9–12 marks] Answers in this band will show good sociological knowledge and understanding of the extent of the question. Sociological terms and concepts will be used with greater accuracy and/or frequency. For the most part, answers will be well developed, focused on the question and there will be a range of points presented. Candidates may say that ‘despite poverty and deprivation clearly being a relevant factor in explaining crime, other factors need to also be considered. For example, poor socialisation may be a reason, with individuals either being brought up not knowing right from wrong or with criminal role models to teach them about a life of crime’. There will be a two-sided response but this may be unbalanced. At the bottom of the band, candidates may provide a narrower range of well- developed points. At the top of the band, expect a wider range of points and clear focus on the question. Band 4 [13–15 marks] Answers in this band will show excellent knowledge and understanding of the extent to which crime is caused by deprivation. There will be a strong grasp of the argument as well as accurate and frequent use of sociological terms and concepts. Answers will be well developed, clearly focused on the question and discuss a wide range of points. Responses will be two-sided and balanced. At the bottom of the band (13 marks), the answer may lack a specific conclusion. Higher in the band, there will be a clear attempt to offer an assessment of the ‘To what extent?’ part of the question through a focused conclusion. Candidates should show consideration of points for and against the idea of whether crime is caused by deprivation, citing some of the examples given.
3 Sociologists debate why an individual might take part in criminal and deviant behaviour. Some blame inadequate socialisation, others look at the process of labelling. What is interesting is that different social groups seem to have different levels of offending. For example, according to official statistics, young people commit more crime than older people. (a) What is meant by the term ‘labelling’? [2] (b) Describe two moral panics. [4] (c) Explain how crime and deviance can be different. [6] (d) Explain why some young people commit crime. [8] (e) To what extent does functionalist theory explain criminal behaviour? [15] Section D: Media
35 marks
Mark scheme: 3(a) What is meant by the term ‘labelling’? One mark for partial definition, e.g. a stereotype/tagging Two marks for clear definition, e.g. the way in which acts and individuals are defined and stereotyped e.g. as deviant/a criminal 2 3(b) Describe two moral panics. Candidates may describe classic moral panics based on sociological studies, contemporary examples or localised examples. All are fine to credit. Possible answers: • the mods and the rockers – Cohen – their deviant behaviour was exaggerated and sensationalised by the media; • the ‘hoodies’ – Fawbert – young people wearing hoodies were portrayed by the media as folk devils and so a moral panic ensued about their perceived deviant behaviour and attitudes; • lone parents – moral panics have ensued about the lack of a father figure leading to feral and undisciplined children with no respect for authority; • football hooligans – at certain periods in history these people have been presented in the media as mindless thugs, intent on causing trouble; • young people and gangs/street culture – the idea whipped up by the media that young people on the streets are up to no good, taking drugs, carrying knives and being delinquent; • illegal immigrants – often portrayed by the media to be criminal, amoral, dangerous and taking ‘our’ jobs; • stereotypical representations in the media that link Muslims with terrorism – Islamophobia; • Stuart Hall, ‘Policing the Crisis’ – this study of the moral panic of mugging saw the police arresting large numbers of black youths who were represented in the media as violent criminals; • video nasties – moral panics are often seen whereby media content is blamed for the delinquent behaviour of youths in society, e.g. ‘Grand Theft Auto’ video games blamed for youth copycat killings; • other reasonable response. One mark for each point correctly identified (up to maximum of two). One mark for each point that is developed (up to a maximum of two). 4 Question Answer Marks 3(c) Explain how crime and deviance can be different. Possible answers: • crime involves the breaking of the law, deviance is about not conforming to norms; • crime is typically more serious than deviance, e.g. murder vs. vandalism; • crime will involve formal agencies of social control in terms of surveillance and punishment, deviance is more likely to be dealt with informally; • crime is not always deviant (e.g. speeding) and deviance is not always criminal (e.g. burping at the dinner table); • deviance can include acts that will be positively sanctioned and rewarded (e.g. heroism), crime is seen to be negative; • other reasonable response. Band 0 [0 marks] No creditworthy response. Band 1 [1–3 marks] Answers in this band will show only a limited awareness of the question and may talk about ‘crime is more serious than deviance’. Responses may be short and un/underdeveloped. At the bottom of the band (1 mark), expect one weak point. Higher in the band (2–3 marks), candidates may offer more than one weak point, but there may be a tendency towards simplistic answers, engaging with sociological ideas without using sociological language. Band 2 [4–6 marks] A clear and accurate explanation, showing good sociological knowledge and understanding of the question. Sociological terms and concepts should be expected, e.g. ‘crime is regulated by the Government and is an act that breaks the law, e.g. murder. Deviance, however, need not be so serious. Instead, it may involve the breaking of norms, perhaps as youth resistance or rebellion in a sub-culture such as the punks’. This would be followed by explanation of factors leading to this. At the bottom of the band, the range of points covered may be narrow or lack detail. Higher in the band, answers will cover more than one factor in a well-developed way or cover several factors in less detail. 6 Question Answer Marks 3(d) Explain why some young people commit crime. Candidates should discuss the various reasons why young people commit crime. In awarding ‘any other reasonable response’, examiners must ensure that candidates are talking about youth crime rather than generic reasons for crime. Possible answers: • some offences by young people are status crimes – only illegal because of the age of the offender, e.g. drinking alcohol under age; • low levels of petty criminality are seen by some to be a ‘normal’ part of growing up during the extended period of adolescence – transition stage (Matza and Drift theory); • boredom – young people have a lot of leisure time and may commit acts of crime as a way of engaging in thrill seeking behaviour (edgework/Postmodernism); • peer pressure – young people spend a lot of time with their peers and want to fit in, in some peer groups this means committing crime, e.g. gang culture; • status frustration – some young people may commit crime in order to increase their low status in society (particularly males, ethnic minorities and the working class); • high youth unemployment and/or low pay amongst young people means that they may suffer from material and/or relative deprivation and so commit crime; • young people may be targeted by the police and therefore due to negative labels and a self-fulfilling prophecy commit crime, e.g. stop and search rates; • young people fit the stereotype of the typical criminal (Cicourel) and so are more likely to be arrested by the police which may lead to deviancy amplification and more crime being committed; • crime and its proceeds may be glamorised in the media and so encourage young people to commit it in order to achieve this kind of lifestyle, e.g. ‘gangsta rap’ culture; • other reasonable response. Band 0 [0 marks] No creditworthy response. 8 Question Answer Marks 3(d) Band 1 [1–3 marks] Answers in this band will show only a limited awareness of the question. A tendency to description is likely. Responses may be short and undeveloped, e.g. ‘young people may commit crime because they are bored’. Sociological terms and concepts are unlikely to be used. At the bottom of the band (1 mark), expect one weak point. Higher in the band (2–3 marks), candidates may offer more than one weak point. Band 2 [4–6 marks] Answers in this band will show basic sociological knowledge and understanding of why young people commit more crime than older people. Responses may be underdeveloped and lacking in range, e.g. ‘young people spend a lot of time with their peer group. This may lead to peer pressure which in turn can lead to crime being committed by younger people’. At the bottom of the band, candidates are unlikely to use sociological terms and concepts accurately. Higher in the band, candidates may be beginning to use sociological terms and concepts with greater accuracy. However, some aspects of the answer may only be partially developed/explained. Band 3 [7–8 marks] Answers in this band will show good sociological knowledge and understanding of why young people commit more crime than older people and will be well developed and explained, e.g. ‘young people are still forming their identities and are unsure of their position and status in society. This, coupled with high youth unemployment, may lead to what Cohen called “status frustration” amongst the young. If status cannot be achieved legitimately then they may turn to crime in order to achieve this, e.g. in gangs’. They can then expand on the explanation of this and other factors as necessary. Sociological terms and concepts will be used accurately overall. Answers will be well focused on the question and there will be a range of reasons presented. At the top of the band explanations will be clear throughout. Question Answer Marks 3(e) To what extent does functionalist theory explain criminal behaviour? Answers may include variations of functionalist theory such as Merton and strain, Hirschi and sub-cultural explanations such as Cohen’s status frustration. They may, in evaluation, discuss the problems with this theory as an adequate explanation for criminality and/or consider other explanations for crime. Possible answers: For: • for most people their collective conscience prevents crime but in times of stress people no longer feel integrated into society and so commit crime; • crime can act as a safety valve that keeps society strong, e.g. men visiting prostitutes can be seen as good for society as it allows them to find sexual release without splitting up a family; • crime can be seen as an indication that change in society is necessary – a warning function; • Cohen – status frustration – crime may occur when an individual has a lack of power and status in society. Committing crime maybe a way to gain this status, e.g. in a gang; • Merton’s strain theory – crime (anomie) may occur if there is a disparity between what individuals want in society and their ability to achieve it legitimately; • primary socialisation – this is thought to be crucial to ensure social conformity, if it isn’t done correctly then criminal behaviour can occur; • crime occurs when socialisation has not been effective and social bonds of attachment that that control criminal tendencies have not been developed (Hirschi); • Murray and the New Right believe crime is committed by a lawless and amoral underclass who have deviant norms and values, different to the mainstream; • other reasonable response. Against: • functionalist theory presumes the trends in the official crime statistics are correct and therefore ignores the dark figure of crime meaning their explanations for crime are incorrect; • Marxism – crime is caused by poverty, structural inequalities and material deprivation; • Left realism – crime is caused by relative deprivation and marginalisation/social exclusion from society; 15 Question Answer Marks 3(e) • feminism – crime is caused by a patriarchal society that legitimates male power and dominance, e.g. domestic violence, control of females; • men are encouraged to prove their masculinity to be seen as hegemonic (Connell) and crime is one way of doing so; • labelling theory – crime is caused by the police/media labelling of individuals/social groups as criminal and the self- fulfilling prophecy and the deviancy amplification that results from this; • postmodernism – crime is committed because it is enjoyable and is characterised by thrill seeking behaviour and edgework (Katz and Lyng); • crime is committed because there are no legitimate ways available for an individual to be successful, e.g. sub-cultural theory and the illegitimate opportunity structure (Cloward and Ohlin); • some people are born criminal – Lombroso’s biological theory; • other reasonable response. Band 0 [0 marks] No creditworthy response. Band 1 [1–4 marks] Answers in this band will be vague and largely based on common sense showing limited knowledge of the extent of the debate in the question. Use of sociological terms or concepts is very unlikely. Responses may be short, undeveloped and one-sided, e.g. ‘crime can show that society needs to change’. Lower in the band (1–2 marks), expect one or two weak points. Higher in the band (3–4 marks) candidates may offer more than two points or provide a weak definition of key terms, e.g. ‘functionalists think that some crime is good’. Band 2 [5–8 marks] In this band candidates will show some basic knowledge of the extent of the debate in the question. Alternatively, they may offer an answer which is list-like in nature but there will be no real attempt to assess the issues raised by the question. There may be limited/some use of sociological terms or concepts. Responses may be underdeveloped and lack range. Answers may be simplistic and two-sided responses are unlikely, e.g. ‘Merton says crime is committed because some people can’t get everything they want in society through education and paid work’. Lower in the band, the response will be rather narrow in the points covered and there will be little development. Higher in the band, more points will be covered and there will be limited development of some points. Alternatively, a list-like answer with little development covering both sides of the argument may score up to 8 marks. A one-sided answer cannot score higher than 8 marks. Question Answer Marks 3(e) Band 3 [9–12 marks] Answers in this band will show good sociological knowledge and understanding of the extent of the debate in the question. Sociological terms and concepts will be used with greater accuracy and/or frequency. For the most part, answers will be well developed, focused on the question and there will be a range of points presented. Candidates may say that, for example, ‘the functionalist explanation for crime presumes that the patterns and trends in the official criminal statistics about typical criminals and crimes are correct. This ignoring of the dark figure of crime means that their explanations do not focus on issues of power and inequality that are thought by many sociologists such as Marxists to be vital in adequately explaining crime. Marxists talk about material deprivation being a real reason for crime’. There will be a two-sided response but this may be unbalanced. At the bottom of the band, candidates may provide a narrower range of well-developed points. At the top of the band, expect a wider range of points and clear focus on the question. Band 4 [13–15 marks] Answers in this band will show excellent knowledge and understanding of the extent of the debate in the question. There will be a strong grasp of the argument as well as accurate and frequent use of sociological terms and concepts. Answers will be well developed, clearly focused on the question and discuss a wide range of points. Responses will be two-sided and balanced. At the bottom of the band (13 marks), the answer may lack a specific conclusion. Higher in the band, there will be a clear attempt to offer an assessment of the ‘To what extent?’ part of the question through a focused conclusion. Candidates should show consideration of points for and against the debate in the question, citing some of the examples given.
3 Many people believe that stricter controls are needed in order to reduce the problem of crime in society. Different explanations have been offered for why crime occurs, ranging from inadequate socialisation to relative deprivation. Some sociologists also think that the formal agencies of social control are unfair and do not treat everybody in the same way. (a) What is meant by the term ‘relative deprivation’? [2] (b) Describe two agencies of social control. [4] (c) Explain how Marxists view crime. [6] (d) Explain why prisons are thought to be an effective deterrent to crime. [8] (e) To what extent are the formal agencies of social control racist? [15] Section D: Media
35 marks
Mark scheme: 3(a) What is meant by the term ‘relative deprivation’? 2 One mark for partial definition, e.g. being poor. Two marks for clear definition, e.g. the feeling of having less than others in a society. 3(b) Describe two agencies of social control. 4 Candidates will describe two different agencies of social control, these can be either formal or informal or a mixture of both. Possible answers: • the police – control through the power of arrest, surveillance and their presence; • the Government – control through the making and implementation and enforcement of the law; • the penal system – control through incarceration/prison, taking away freedom and choices; • the judiciary – control through sentencing, deciding if someone is guilty or innocent and, if guilty, how best to sentence them; • the family – control through sanctions, imitation, gender roles (canalisation etc.); • education and schools – control through negative and positive sanctions, the hidden curriculum etc.; • the workplace – control through promotion, dismissal, paying wages, re- socialisation; • the peer group – control through peers wanting to fit in, peer pressure, role models; • the media – control through representations and stereotypes, moral panics, imitation, agenda setting, norm referencing etc.; • religion – control through the ultimate sanctions of heaven and hell, dress codes, dietary requirements, prayer etc.; • other reasonable response. One mark for each point correctly identified (up to maximum of two). One mark for each point that is developed (up to a maximum of two). 3(c) Explain how Marxists view crime. 6 Candidates should show an understanding of the Marxist view of crime. This can also include Left Realist explanations such as Lea and Young’s. Possible answers: • laws are made in the interests of the ruling class and criminalise the actions of the working class – this is why there are so many more working class criminals; • white-collar and corporate crime is hidden in the OCS as the agents of social control focus their attentions on the lower classes; • police, as agents of the state, target and arrest the working class far more than the ruling class meaning they are over-represented in the OCS and the prison population; • working class crime as an expression of resistance against the structural inequalities of society; • material deprivation – poverty leads to crime; • relative deprivation – in a consumer driven society material possessions become highly valued but not everyone can afford them, hence crime occurs; • status frustration, marginalisation and alienation – lower social classes and some ethnic minorities do not feel part of wider society so have no other outlet for their frustrations and anger than rioting, vandalism and crime; • Marxists believe that capitalism causes crime; • Marxists believe that the police operate a system of selective law enforcement through, for example, targeting particular social groups; • other reasonable response. Band 0 [0 marks] No creditworthy response. Band 1 [1–3 marks] Answers in this band will show only a limited awareness of Marxist explanations for crime and may talk about e.g. ‘some people in society are poor so they can’t get all the things they want and so turn to crime’. Responses may be short and un/under developed. At the bottom of the band (1 mark), expect one weak point. Higher in the band (2-3 marks), candidates may offer more than one weak point, but there may be a tendency towards simplistic answers, engaging with sociological ideas without using sociological language. 3(c) Band 2 [4–6 marks] A clear and accurate explanation, showing good sociological knowledge and understanding of Marxist explanations for crime. Sociological terms and concepts should be expected e.g. ‘Marxists believe the laws and the criminal justice system are made in favour of the ruling class. Thus the working classes are frequently targeted by the state agents, the police, and so are arrested and imprisoned more. This can often lead to frustrations and anger at the perceived unfairness and this can cause more crime to occur’. This would be followed by explanation of factors leading to this. At the bottom of the band, the range of points covered may be narrow or lack detail. Higher in the band, answers will cover more than one factor in a well-developed way or cover several factors in less detail. 3(d) Explain why prisons are thought to be an effective deterrent to crime. 8 Candidates should show an understanding of a range of reasons why prisons are thought to be an effective deterrent to crime. Answers focusing on policing or non-custodial sentences should not be credited. Possible answers: • incapacitation – prison prevents the offender from committing more crime by locking them away, this deters people from crime; • prison is represented in the media as a violent, scary place and so this deters people from committing crime as they do not want to be sent here; • warning function – sending criminals to prison deters others in society from committing crime as it serves as a reminder of what could happen to them; • prison forces criminals to deal with the consequences of offending – there are now schemes of restorative justice as well as compulsory counselling and treatment programmes that prisoners have to attend. This acts as a deterrent to others; • prison uniforms are thought by many to act as a form of humiliation and thus as a deterrent to others to not commit crime – stripping away of an individual’s identity; • restrictions on everyday, taken for granted activities such as showering, seeing loved ones, exercise etc. are a deterrent as these are seen as basic human rights; • prisons act as a deterrent to crime as people do not want to get a criminal record – this can, for example, negatively affect job opportunities; • other reasonable response. Band 0 [0 marks] No creditworthy response. Band 1 [1–3 marks] Answers in this band will show only a limited awareness of why the penal system is an effective deterrent to crime. A tendency to description is likely. Responses may be short and undeveloped, e.g. ‘people are afraid to go to prison so they don’t commit crime’, stated without explanation. Sociological terms and concepts are unlikely to be used. At the bottom of the band (1 mark), expect one weak point. Higher in the band (2-3 marks), candidates may offer more than one weak point. Band 2 [4–6 marks] Answers in this band will show basic sociological knowledge and understanding of why the penal system is an effective deterrent to crime. Responses may be underdeveloped and lacking in range. e.g. ‘Prisons deter people from committing crime because they are represented in the media in a negative and scary way meaning people are afraid to go there and so conform to the law’ etc. At the bottom of the band, candidates are unlikely to use sociological terms and concepts accurately. Higher in the band, candidates may be beginning to use sociological terms and concepts with greater accuracy. However, some aspects of the answer may only be partially developed/explained. 3(d) Band 3 [7–8 marks] Answers in this band will show good sociological knowledge and understanding of why the penal system is an effective deterrent to crime and will be well developed and explained. e.g. ‘Prisons are thought to act as a warning function in society. This means that they are a constant reminder to others of what the consequences of committing crime are. Prisons are shown to be violent and intimidating and so most people are scared of the thought of them which means they act as an effective deterrent and promote societal conformity’. etc. They can then expand on the explanation of this and other factors as necessary. Sociological terms and concepts will be used accurately overall. Answers will be well focused on the question and there will be a range of reasons presented. At the top of the band explanations will be clear throughout. 3(e) To what extent are the formal agencies of social control racist? 15 Candidates should consider the extent to which the formal agencies of social control may be racist. This may include consideration of the judiciary, the police and the prison system. They could talk generally about this topic or could focus more specifically on specific examples of racism. Local/culturally specific examples may be referred to and should be credited accordingly. Possible answers: FOR • arrest and stop and search rates for ethnic minorities are considerably higher than for the ethic majority e.g. 6 times higher for Afro-Caribbeans than whites in the UK; • Cicourel’s study shows that the police and courts have a picture in their heads of the ‘typical delinquent’ and this is linked to ethnicity; • the police, judiciary and other formal agents of social control are all dominated by the ethnic majority, this may lead to prejudice and discrimination against ethnic minorities; • the Metropolitan police in London were branded as institutionally racist by an independent report after the death of Stephen Lawrence, a black teenager; • ethnic minorities are over-represented in the prison system which may be a sign of the formal agents of social control being racist; • police labelling of ethnic minorities as criminals may lead to police targeting of areas dominated by ethnic minorities e.g. inner city gangs, this could be racist; • Hall et al ‘Policing the Crisis’ shows how young Afro-Caribbeans became stereotyped as muggers which led to police crackdowns on this social group following pressure from the Government; • research shows that members of ethnic minorities face more custodial sentences than the ethnic majority as well as receiving a longer prison term; • Islamaphobia has been blamed by many sociologists for the increases in targeting, arresting and sentencing of Asians in recent years; • other reasonable response. AGAINST • Marxists would claim that the formal agents of social control are more biased against those from the working class than ethnic minorities; • many sociologists believe that being young and male are greater ‘risk’ factors when it comes to unequal treatment by the formal agents of social control than ethnicity; • the Race Relations Act and other equal opportunities legislation means that everyone is very aware of the need to treat all ethnic groups fairly, thereby eliminating racism in the formal agents of social control; • there have been several active campaigns to increase numbers of ethnic minorities in positions of power in the formal agents of social control e.g. the police, in order to prevent future cases of racism; 3(e) • racism is illegal and therefore the formal agents of social control would be subject to severe negative sanctions were they shown to be racist; • positive ethnic discrimination may take place which may lead to the more favourable treatment of ethnic minorities in the criminal justice system; • many sociologists believe that the reason there seems to be a disproportionate number of ethnic minorities involved with the formal agents of social control is because demographically they are a young population – something which is proven to be linked with higher levels of offending; • Marxist/Left Realist sociologists believe ethnic minorities may commit more crime than the ethnic majority due to material deprivation and marginalisation – this is not evidence of racist formal agents of social control; • New Right cultural explanations (Murray) that the formal agents are not racist but instead that some ethnic groups do commit more crime; • other reasonable response. Band 0 [0 marks] No creditworthy response. Band 1 [1–4 marks] Answers in this band may be vague and largely based on common sense showing limited knowledge of the extent to which formal agents of social control are racist. Use of sociological terms or concepts is very unlikely. Responses may be short, undeveloped and one-sided. e.g.‘the formal agents may well be racist because there are a lot more ethnic minorities in prison than the ethnic majority’. Lower in the band (1-2 marks), expect one or two weak points. Higher in the band (3-4 marks) candidates may offer more than two points or provide a weak definition of key terms, e.g. the formal agents are the police, prisons and the courts. Band 2 [5–8 marks] In this band candidates will show some basic knowledge of the extent to which the formal agents of social control is racist. Alternatively, they may offer an answer which is list-like in nature but there will be no real attempt to assess the issues raised by the question. There may be limited/some use of sociological terms or concepts. Responses may be underdeveloped and lack range. Answers may be simplistic and two-sided responses are unlikely e.g ‘Media stereotypes of ethnic minorities as criminals may lead the police to believe that they are bad people and so arrest them more’ etc. Lower in the band, the response will be rather narrow in the points covered and there will be little development. Higher in the band, more points will be covered and there will be limited development of some points. Alternatively, a list-like answer with little development covering both sides of the argument may score up to 8 marks. A one-sided answer cannot score higher than 8 marks. 3(e) Band 3 [9–12 marks] Answers in this band will show good sociological knowledge and understanding of the extent to which the formal agents of social control are racist. Sociological terms and concepts will be used with greater accuracy and/or frequency. For the most part, answers will be well developed, focused on the question and there will be a range of points presented. Candidates may say that e.g. ‘despite there being much evidence to suggest racism in the formal agents of social control, it may be more accurate to consider the reasons why ethnic minorities do commit crime. The Marxists, for example talk about material deprivation and how this may lead some ethnic minorities to crime as they do not have legitimate means to succeed or gain status. The Left Realists similarly believe their higher rates of offending may be due to them feeling alienated from the host nation and not experiencing those bonds of attachment. It is thus the society itself that is racist, not the formal agents’. There will be a two-sided response but this may be unbalanced. At the bottom of the band, candidates may provide a narrower range of well-developed points. At the top of the band, expect a wider range of points and clear focus on the question. Band 4 [13–15 marks] Answers in this band will show excellent knowledge and understanding of the extent to which the formal agents of social control are racist. There will be a strong grasp of the argument as well as accurate and frequent use of sociological terms and concepts. Answers will be well developed, clearly focused on the question and discuss a wide range of points. Responses will be two-sided and balanced. At the bottom of the band (13 marks), the answer may lack a specific conclusion. Higher in the band, there will be a clear attempt to offer an assessment of the ‘To what extent.?’ part of the question through a focused conclusion. Candidates should show consideration of points for and against the idea of whether the formal agents of social control are racist, citing some of the examples given.
4 In many countries there is public service broadcasting. However, some media is controlled by private companies who make large profits. Audiences consume the media in different ways and patterns of use are quite diverse. Whether the content of the media influences the audience’s behaviour and attitudes remains a matter of debate. (a) What is meant by the term ‘public service broadcasting’? [2] (b) Describe two examples of the digital divide in the media. [4] (c) Explain how different age groups vary in their patterns of media use. [6] (d) Explain why the media needs to be censored. [8] (e) To what extent is the cultural effects approach correct in explaining how the audience is influenced by the media? [15]
35 marks
Mark scheme: 4(a) What is meant by the term ‘public service broadcasting’? 2 One mark for partial definition, e.g. it is publicly owned. Two marks for clear definition, e.g. media that is funded by the public and is therefore not for profit. It has a public service e.g. to provide information and education as well as entertainment. 4(b) Describe two examples of the digital divide in the media. 4 DIGITAL DIVIDE: inequalities between social groups in their access to media and digital information technology. Candidates are likely to refer to age and/or class/income in their responses. Possible answers: • age – older people can’t access digital features in the media today therefore are excluded from some activities e.g. online paying of bills, online banking etc.; • money/class – internet access is linked to income, the less money you have, the less likely you are to be connected to the internet; • money/class – those with less money are less likely to have access to the most up-to-date devices with the best functionality; • location – different cultures, countries and societies have very different experiences of and access to digital media – the global divide; • location – those with access to digital media can improve their social capital, education and employment opportunities; • other reasonable response. One mark for each point correctly identified (up to maximum of two). One mark for each point that is developed (up to a maximum of two). 4(c) Explain how different age groups vary in their patterns of media use. 6 Candidates need to show an understanding of ways that different age groups vary in their patterns of media use. Specific age groups may be focused on e.g. the elderly, the middle aged, teenagers, children etc. Examples from an international, national or local context may be included, these should be credited accordingly. Possible answers: • the amount of TV watched increases when the viewer is 50+, it is less when younger; • new technologies are more frequently used by the younger age groups than older e.g. streaming movies, social media, apps etc; • older people are less likely to use the internet than younger people, particularly older women; • teenagers and younger people tend to visit the cinema more than older people; • young people and teenagers watch more ‘shorter videos’ than the older generations e.g clips on Youtube or memes/vines; • middle aged and older people, particularly men, are more likely to use the media for information than younger age groups who are more likely to use it for entertainment; • older people are more likely to engage with traditional media than younger people who are more likely to use new/digital media; • younger people are more involved in the gaming industry than older people; • other reasonable response. Band 0 [0 marks] No creditworthy response. Band 1 [1–3 marks] Answers in this band will show only a limited awareness of how different age groups use the media differently and may talk about e.g. ‘older people watch a lot more TV than younger people do, they are more likely to use a PC or a laptop’. Responses may be short and un/under developed. At the bottom of the band (1 mark), expect one weak point. Higher in the band (2-3 marks), candidates may offer more than one weak point, but there may be a tendency towards simplistic answers, engaging with sociological ideas without using sociological language. 4(c) Band 2 [4–6 marks] A clear and accurate explanation, showing good sociological knowledge and understanding of how different age groups use the media differently. Sociological terms and concepts should be expected e.g. ‘The older generation typically use the media for different purposes than the younger generation. Older people are more likely to want to be educated or informed by the media in a serious style, such as through a broadsheet newspaper for example. The younger generation are more likely to consume digitally and for entertainment or escapism’. This would be followed by explanation of factors leading to this. At the bottom of the band, the range of points covered may be narrow or lack detail. Higher in the band, answers will cover more than one factor in a well-developed way or cover several factors in less detail. 4(d) Explain why the media needs to be censored. 8 Candidates may consider different reasons why the media may need to be censored. They may talk generally or may refer to specific examples of the media. Examples of censorship may also be discussed. Possible answers: • to prevent unsuitable content being broadcast e.g. the 9pm TV watershed, film classifications or laws of obscenity; • to protect vulnerable members of society from inappropriate content e.g. violence, bad language, scenes of a sexual nature as this is believed to negatively affect the audience e.g. children and violence; • the hypodermic model says that the audience are directly affected by what is broadcast in the media therefore censorship is needed as a form of protection for the audience; • the cultural effects model says that the audience experience a slow and cumulative effect from the media, the ‘drip drip effect’ therefore censorship is needed to protect from this e.g. violence in video games; • to protect individuals from unfounded allegations e.g. laws of libel and slander; • in the interests of national security e.g. the official secrets act; • laws to protect minority groups and to prevent their unfair treatment e.g. ethnic minorities, the disabled etc.; • self-censorship – in the digital age this is needed as a form of internal regulation by the media industry as internet content is particularly difficult to control; • other reasonable response. Band 0 [0 marks] No creditworthy response. Band 1 [1–3 marks] Answers in this band will show only a limited awareness of why the media needs to be censored. A tendency to description is likely. Responses may be short and undeveloped, e.g. ‘to prevent children from seeing unsuitable material e.g violence’, stated without explanation. Sociological terms and concepts are unlikely to be used. At the bottom of the band (1 mark), expect one weak point. Higher in the band (2-3 marks), candidates may offer more than one weak point. Band 2 [4–6 marks] Answers in this band will show basic sociological knowledge and understanding of why the media needs to be censored. Responses may be underdeveloped and lacking in range. e.g. ‘The media needs to be censored because of the content not being suitable for everyone. For example, it has been accused by the hypodermic model of causing increased levels of violence in children through imitation due to its violent content’ etc. At the bottom of the band, candidates are unlikely to use sociological terms and concepts accurately. Higher in the band, candidates may be beginning to use sociological terms and concepts with greater accuracy. However, some aspects of the answer may only be partially developed/explained. 4(d) Band 3 [7–8 marks] Answers in this band will show good sociological knowledge and understanding of why the media needs to be censored and will be well developed and explained. e.g. ‘There is a strong argument for believing that the content of the media can affect the audience, often in negative ways according to the hypodermic model. Therefore censorship is both needed and justified in the media. For example, there is the TV watershed that ensures that unsuitable content is not shown before 9pm, alongside laws such as The Official Secrets Act to censor information in order to protect national security. Self-censorship is also seen in the media whereby the material is made suitable for an audience in order to gain a particular BBFC film certificate, for example‘. They can then expand on the explanation of this and other factors as necessary. Sociological terms and concepts will be used accurately overall. Answers will be well focused on the question and there will be a range of reasons presented. At the top of the band explanations will be clear throughout. 4(e) To what extent is the cultural effects approach correct in explaining 15 how the audience are influenced by the media? CULTURAL EFFECTS APPROACH: the slow, cumulative effects of the media on the audience. Candidates should focus specifically on the cultural effects approach in their arguments for the claim in the question. They may adopt a general approach to the question or may focus on specific forms of media and/or specific examples. Likely areas of focus for discussing are stereotypes of social groups and their effects on the audience, violence, sex, bad language, politics etc. Possible answers: FOR: • the cultural effects approach recognises that the effects of media on the audience are unlikely to be instant but instead will be a slow, cumulative effect; • the approach recognises that effects on the audience are dependant upon context and circumstances, thus being a more realistic view than, say, the hypodermic model; • this approach has been used to explain the effects of regularly seeing stereotypes in the media and how this can be linked to discrimination e.g. the sexualised objectification of women leads to society as a whole seeing women in this narrow way; • the cultural effects approach says that long-term media effects on the audience may be most pronounced when the audience do not have access to other sources of information e.g. censorship in North Korea; • the work of the Glasgow Media Group seems to support this approach in showing that the media do, over time, shape people’s attitudes and opinions e.g. to immigrants; • the Glasgow Media Group’s work shows that the audience do not passively absorb media messages but that the media does influence what we think and believe over time; • arguments about the role of agenda setting and norm referencing in the media also support the cultural effects approach as they show how things can become embodied in a culture and seen as ‘normal’; • news values are another good example of the cultural effects approach as they demonstrate what audiences and media professionals have come to believe are elements of ‘good’ news stories; • other reasonable response. AGAINST: • the hypodermic model believes that the effects of the media are far more immediate and direct than the cultural effects approach e.g. the dangers of violent material being seen by children are thought to be very real (Bandura); • censorship laws would seem to suggest that the cultural effects approach is not correct in its view of media effects as the laws in place infer that content could immediately be damaging to the audience e.g. the Official Secrets Act, laws of libel etc.; 4(e) • the uses and gratifications approach awards the audience with far more power and control over how they are affected by the media than the cultural effects approach, McQuail says we should ask ‘how do audiences use the media’?; • audience selection says the audience have power over the media as they can decide how they interpret any media content that they consume e.g. Hall’s work on reading the media; • postmodern work on the new media says that the audience are now in control of the media and therefore are not affected by it but are active producers of it instead e.g. through the internet; • the interactive nature of new media means that the audience can actively construct meanings through discussion, comments and immersion e.g. forums, blogs, gaming etc.; • pluralism – there is so much diversity in today’s media that audience choice is vast and therefore it is impossible to say that effects are caused solely by the cumulative effects of the media; • other reasonable response. Band 0 [0 marks] No creditworthy response. Band 1 [1–4 marks] Answers in this band may be vague and largely based on common sense showing limited knowledge of the extent to which the cultural effects approach is correct in explaining how the media affects the audience. Use of sociological terms or concepts is very unlikely. Responses may be short, undeveloped and one-sided. e.g. ‘When the audience sees something in the media repeatedly they do start to believe it’. Lower in the band (1-2 marks), expect one or two weak points. Higher in the band (3-4 marks) candidates may offer more than two points or provide a weak definition of key terms, e.g. the cultural effects approach says media content does affect the audience. Band 2 [5–8 marks] In this band candidates will show some basic knowledge of the extent to which the cultural effects approach is correct in explaining how the media affects the audience. Alternatively, they may offer an answer which is list- like in nature but there will be no real attempt to assess the issues raised by the question. There may be limited/some use of sociological terms or concepts. Responses may be underdeveloped and lack range. Answers may be simplistic and two-sided responses are unlikely e.g. ‘When the audience sees something in the media repeatedly they do start to believe it. For example, the representation of the idealised woman is a frequently seen stereotype in the media that affects females’ etc. Lower in the band, the response will be rather narrow in the points covered and there will be little development. Higher in the band, more points will be covered and there will be limited development of some points. Alternatively, a list-like answer with little development covering both sides of the argument may score up to 8 marks. A one-sided answer cannot score higher than 8 marks. 4(e) Band 3 [9–12 marks] Answers in this band will show good sociological knowledge and understanding of the extent to which the cultural effects approach is correct in explaining how the media affects the audience. Sociological terms and concepts will be used with greater accuracy and/or frequency. For the most part, answers will be well developed, focused on the question and there will be a range of points presented. Candidates may say that e.g. ‘despite there being a lot of evidence to support the view of cumulative effects on the audience from repeatedly being shown in the media, this isn’t always true. For example, the active audience model believes that the audience select what media to consume as well as how or whether to be affected by it. This is supported by Morley/Hall’s ideas of preferred, negotiated and oppositional readings. They are also, according to postmodernists, the prosumers – not only are they receiving the media they are also producing new media therefore are not really in a position to be affected passively anymore.’ There will be a two-sided response but this may be unbalanced. At the bottom of the band, candidates may provide a narrower range of well- developed points. At the top of the band, expect a wider range of points and clear focus on the question. Band 4 [13–15 marks] Answers in this band will show excellent knowledge and understanding of the extent to which the cultural effects approach is correct in explaining how the media affects the audience. There will be a strong grasp of the argument as well as accurate and frequent use of sociological terms and concepts. Answers will be well developed, clearly focused on the question and discuss a wide range of points. Responses will be two-sided and balanced. At the bottom of the band (13 marks), the answer may lack a specific conclusion. Higher in the band, there will be a clear attempt to offer an assessment of the ‘To what extent.?’ part of the question through a focused conclusion. Candidates should show consideration of points for and against the idea of whether the cultural effects approach is correct in explaining how the media affects the audience, citing some of the examples given.
3 There are official and non-official statistics that measure the crime rate in a society. However, not all crimes are accurately represented in the statistics suggesting that some groups are less likely than others to be prosecuted for their crimes. Some believe there is a need for more formal social control and harsher punishments to deal with the high levels of offending. (a) What is meant by the term ‘formal social control’? [2] (b) Describe two punishments for crime. [4] (c) Explain how poverty can be linked to crime. [6] (d) Explain why white-collar crime is under-reported and under-recorded in the official crime statistics. [8] (e) To what extent are self-report studies the most accurate measurement of crime? [15] Section D: Media
35 marks
Mark scheme: 3(a) What is meant by the term ‘formal social control’? 2 One mark for partial definition, e.g. the police. Two marks for clear definition, e.g. formal social control is the ways the Government or its agencies get people to conform to the law. 3(b) Describe two punishments for crime. 4 Candidates will describe two different punishments for crime – these could be formal or informal. Possible answers: • a prison sentence – takes away a person’s freedom; • the death sentence – for the most serious crimes the punishment may be death; • corporal punishment – some societies punish criminals physically e.g. with lashes; • community sentencing – non-custodial sentences that help the community in some way; • exile or ostracism – the offender has to leave or is excluded from their community; • tagging – electronic tags can be used to monitor a person’s behaviour and whereabouts; • fine – a monetary sanction designed to punish offenders financially; • other reasonable response. One mark for each point correctly identified (up to maximum of two). One mark for each point that is developed (up to a maximum of two). 3(c) Explain how poverty can be linked to crime. 6 Candidates should show an understanding of how poverty can be linked to crime. Specific examples may be referred to as may the Marxist view. Possible answers: • relative deprivation – when individuals see themselves as deprived in relation to others crime may occur (Merton strain theory); • marginalisation – when groups have no organisations to represent and protect their interests therefore may turn to crime to vent their frustrations and anger at society (Lea and Young); • in countries with no/inadequate welfare systems, crime may be the only way to survive; • Cloward and Ohlin believed that in deprived and poor communities individuals engaged in criminal or deviant behaviour to be part of the illegitimate opportunity structure when mainstream society offered them few possibilities for legitimate success; • poorer people are more likely to be labelled as criminal and are thus targeted more by the formal agents e.g. stop and search/arrest rates; • deviant careers – the effects of public labelling can devastate a person and give them little choice but to adopt a life of crime; • Cohen – status frustration – poorer people may find it difficult to achieve status in legitimate means in society and so may turn to crime for this instead; • Marxists believe that capitalism causes crime as it creates an unequal society that keeps poor people poor and rich people rich and sees a growing gap in inequalities; • the media often turn the poor into folk devils and blame them for criminal activities in society; • individuals may turn to crime in response to these negative labels; • the underclass – Charles Murray – are said to have a distinct set of deviant values which can be linked to criminality; • other reasonable response. Band 0 [0 marks] No creditworthy response. Band 1 [1–3 marks] Answers in this band will show only a limited awareness of how poverty can be linked to crime and may talk about e.g. ‘many poorer people may commit crime as a way to get desirable items in society’. Responses may be short and un/under developed. At the bottom of the band (1 mark), expect one weak point. Higher in the band (2-3 marks), candidates may offer more than one weak point, but there may be a tendency towards simplistic answers, engaging with sociological ideas without using sociological language. 3(c) Band 2 [4–6 marks] A clear and accurate explanation, showing good sociological knowledge and understanding of how poverty can be linked to crime and deviance. Sociological terms and concepts should be expected e.g. ‘The media create folk devils from poor people and the underclass in society who are blamed for certain crimes e.g. inner-city riots. This can lead to the group or individual feeling status frustration and therefore turning to crime as a response. They self-fulfil their negative label which further links poverty to crime’. This would be followed by explanation of factors leading to this. At the bottom of the band, the range of points covered may be narrow or lack detail. Higher in the band, answers will cover more than one factor in a well-developed way or cover several factors in less detail. 3(d) Explain why white-collar crime is under-reported and under-recorded 8 in the official crime statistics. Candidates should show an understanding of a range of reasons why white- collar crime is under-reported and under-recorded in the OCS. Candidates do not need to discuss both under-reporting and under-recording separately to score the marks. WHITE-COLLAR CRIME – non-violent crime committed by middle class people for financial gain e.g. fraud, embezzlement. Possible answers: • not reported – as white-collar crimes are financial rather than physical people are not always aware that they have been a victim; • not reported – some people may feel that reporting a white-collar crime is a waste of time as nothing can be done about it; • not reported – sometimes white-collar crimes may not be reported because the victim may be part of the organisation that has committed the crime and does not want to get into trouble themselves; • white collar crimes are sometimes not seen to be as important as other types of crime hence why they are not always reported and not always recorded; • not recorded – the police may feel there is little chance of a prosecution due to a lack of evidence; • the police may take bribes from the offending company/individual which leads to under-recording; • Marxists believe that the police work for the state and therefore are reluctant to record white-collar crimes as they are part of this same exploitative elite leading to under-recording; • police may not record white-collar crimes because they are dealt with internally by the company involved; • other reasonable response. Band 0 [0 marks] No creditworthy response. Band 1 [1–3 marks] Answers in this band will show only a limited awareness of why white-collar crime is under-reported and under-recorded in the OCS. A tendency to description is likely. Responses may be short and undeveloped, e.g. ‘police officers take bribes from wealthy business men’ stated without explanation. Sociological terms and concepts are unlikely to be used. At the bottom of the band (1 mark), expect one weak point. Higher in the band (2-3 marks), candidates may offer more than one weak point. 3(d) Band 2 [4–6 marks] Answers in this band will show basic sociological knowledge and understanding of why white-collar crime is under-reported and under-recorded in the OCS. Responses may be underdeveloped and lacking in range. e.g. ‘white-collar crime is financial and so does not cause any physical harm to people which makes it harder to spot. Many people don’t know they have been a victim of this kind of crime and so that is why it doesn’t get reported’ etc. At the bottom of the band, candidates are unlikely to use sociological terms and concepts accurately. Higher in the band, candidates may be beginning to use sociological terms and concepts with greater accuracy. However, some aspects of the answer may only be partially developed/explained. Band 3 [7–8 marks] Answers in this band will show good sociological knowledge and understanding of why white-collar crime is under-reported ad under-recorded in the OCS and will be well developed and explained. e.g. ‘under-reported and under-recorded crime is known as the dark figure. There is a large dark figure of white-collar crime because many people are not aware that they have been a victim of this kind of invisible crime. The police may also not record these crimes very often as often other companies deal with the offence instead e.g. credit card companies, financial institutions. They do not want the crimes to be public knowledge and cause a moral panic and so these are often kept hidden’ etc. ’ They can then expand on the explanation of this and other factors as necessary. Sociological terms and concepts will be used accurately overall. Answers will be well focused on the question and there will be a range of reasons presented. At the top of the band explanations will be clear throughout. 3(e) To what extent are self-report studies the most accurate measurement 15 of crime? Candidates should consider the ways in which self-report studies could be the most accurate measurement of crime. Local/culturally specific examples may be referred to. In evaluation the issues with self-report studies could be considered and/or the advantages of victim surveys and official statistics as better measurements of crime. Possible answers: FOR • official measures of crime such as statistics contain a huge dark figure and therefore unofficial methods like self report studies are a better measure of crime as the dark figure is uncovered; • self-report studies ask people anonymously whether they have committed a crime thus revealing a better, more valid picture of crime than the official one as non-convicted criminals are also included; • criminals may be more likely to talk about their offending to a researcher using a self-report study than a formal agent like the police as they know there are no repercussions and so feel more comfortable; • self-report studies are confidential therefore people may reveal crimes they have committed that they would not have otherwise admitted to; • self-report studies question who they ‘typical offender’ really is – they show, for example, that significant amounts of crime are committed by the middle class and women which challenges the accuracy of official measures of crime; • lots of data both qualitative and quantitative and can be gathered quickly and cheaply from different groups and large samples by using a self- report study; • other reasonable response. AGAINST • self-report studies may not include valid information as they are reliant on individuals admitting to crimes that they have committed; self-report studies can be criticised for a lack of representativeness as they are often carried out with young people – serious and white-collar crimes may therefore be omitted; • official statistics are collected by official agencies and thus are more credible and trustworthy; • official statistics show police counts of the total numbers of charges for different types of offences; • official statistics show court records of the total number of convictions for different crimes; • official statistics reveal patterns and trends in the social characteristics of offenders; • official statistics are collected and published annually therefore always show an up-to-date picture of crime; • official statistics allow for comparisons to be made e.g. between different areas, genders etc; 3(e) • many non-official measurements of crime such as self-report studies do not include victimless crimes such as drug use and therefore provide an incomplete picture of crime; • non-official measurements of crime such as self-report studies rely on the criminal or victim’s memory for its information and this may not be true – people forget things, exaggerate etc; • local victim surveys take an in-depth look at the experiences of victims which self-report studies do not, building up trust and so may get people to open up about what has happened to them e.g. feminist VS’s and sexual crime; • victim surveys may be more accurate than self-report studies as non- official ways of measuring crime as they ask the victims rather than the offenders who are more likely to tell the truth; • other reasonable response. Band 0 [0 marks] No creditworthy response. Band 1 [1–4 marks] Answers in this band may be vague and largely based on common sense showing limited knowledge of the extent to which self-report studies are the most accurate way of measuring crime. Use of sociological terms or concepts is very unlikely. Responses may be short, undeveloped and one- sided. e.g. 'they find out about crimes the police don't know about'. Lower in the band (1-2 marks), expect one or two weak points. Higher in the band (3-4 marks) candidates may offer more than two points or provide a weak definition of key terms, e.g. self-report studies ask people what crimes they have committed. in the question. Band 2 [5–8 marks] In this band candidates will show some basic knowledge of the extent to which self-report studies are the most accurate way of measuring crime. Alternatively, they may offer an answer which is list-like in nature but there will be no real attempt to assess the issues raised by the question. There may be limited/some use of sociological terms or concepts. Responses may be underdeveloped and lack range. Answers may be simplistic and two-sided responses are unlikely e.g. Not everyone reports a crime committed against them to the police so unofficial measures of crime like self-report studies are a good way to find out about these unknown crimes’ etc. Lower in the band, the response will be rather narrow in the points covered and there will be little development. Higher in the band, more points will be covered and there will be limited development of some points. Alternatively, a list-like answer with little development covering both sides of the argument may score up to 8 marks. A one-sided answer cannot score higher than 8 marks. 3(e) Band 3 [9–12 marks] Answers in this band will show good sociological knowledge and understanding of the extent to which self-report studies are the most accurate way of measuring crime. Sociological terms and concepts will be used with greater accuracy and/or frequency. For the most part, answers will be well developed, focused on the question and there will be a range of points presented. Candidates may say that e.g. ‘despite the OCS being recognised as the most easily accessible and generalisable source of information on crime in most societies, self-report studies are thought by many sociologists to produce a far more valid picture due to their uncovering of the dark figure of crime. They are both confidential and anonymous which means offenders are likely to be honest in their answers. It is from these sources that our understanding of who he typical criminal is in society has been challenged. Self-report studies reveal, for example, the large amount of crime committed by women and the middle classes.’. There will be a two-sided response but this may be unbalanced. At the bottom of the band, candidates may provide a narrower range of well developed points. At the top of the band, expect a wider range of points and clear focus on the question. Band 4 [13–15 marks] Answers in this band will show excellent knowledge and understanding of the extent to which self-report studies are the most accurate measurement of crime. There will be a strong grasp of the argument as well as accurate and frequent use of sociological terms and concepts. Answers will be well developed, clearly focused on the question and discuss a wide range of points. Responses will be two-sided and balanced. At the bottom of the band (13 marks), the answer may lack a specific conclusion. Higher in the band, there will be a clear attempt to offer an assessment of the ‘To what extent.?’ part of the question through a focused conclusion. Candidates should show consideration of points for and against the idea of the usefulness of self-report studies as a measure of crime, citing some of the examples given.
4 The media is often accused of exaggerated and sensationalist content, particularly in the news. This can be due to the pressures of advertising, issues of agenda setting and news values. This has led to the argument that the media and the news are biased. However, bias in the media may be reducing due to increased levels of audience interactivity and social media. (a) What is meant by the term ‘bias’? [2] (b) Describe two ways media content can be censored. [4] (c) Explain how people interact using social media. [6] (d) Explain why the media is an important agency of social control. [8] (e) To what extent does the news reflect reality? [15]
35 marks
Mark scheme: 4(a) What is meant by the term ‘bias’? 2 One mark for partial definition, e.g. not being fair. Two marks for clear definition, e.g. being one sided in the selection of which events and stories are reported and how. 4(b) Describe two ways media content can be censored. 4 Possible answers: • laws protecting the state – e.g. the UK Official Secrets Act; • morals – laws on obscenity; • libel and slander laws – to prevent unfounded allegations being made against individuals; • laws preventing the unfair treatment of minority groups – e.g.anti- discrimination legislation; • the certification system for films and music videos and computer games – BBFC, PEGI etc; • the TV watershed – which prevents some sex, violence, drug-taking and swearing being shown before 9pm to protect children; • agenda setting/bias – these will affect the content of the media through informal censorship; • internet and media self-regulation – of content, words and image; • self-censorship – individuals censoring their own media representations e.g. on social media accounts; • other reasonable response. One mark for each point correctly identified (up to maximum of two). One mark for each point that is developed (up to a maximum of two). 4(c) Explain how people interact using social media. 6 Candidates need to show an understanding of what is meant by social media (communication and networking) and how it can be used in different ways to interact. Examples from an international, national or local context may be included, these should be credited accordingly. Possible answers: • for communication e.g. to keep in touch with relatives and friends across the globe; • in order to share photos and videos through sites such as Youtube; • for entertainment though memes, video shorts, viral joke, gossip, trivia etc; • to find employment and/or to make work-based connections – Linked In is a good example here; • for dating – social media sites are becoming the method of choice for many people now when looking for a relationship; • for information – an easy way to keep up to date with the latest news and breaking stories from across the globe; • to see what is fashionable and in style – used to help form a personal identity; • for support in areas of life such as friendship issues, mental health etc as well as for study groups; • social media can use ‘cookies’ to track audience interests so allowing the user to interact with other people with similar interests; • other reasonable response. Band 0 [0 marks] No creditworthy response. Band 1 [1–3 marks] Answers in this band will show only a limited awareness of how the audience can use social media for interaction and may talk about e.g. ‘using it to communicate and keep in touch’. The terms ‘social media’ or ‘interact’ may not be fully understood. Responses may be short and un/under developed. At the bottom of the band (1 mark), expect one weak point. Higher in the band (2-3 marks), candidates may offer more than one weak point, but there may be a tendency towards simplistic answers, engaging with sociological ideas without using sociological language. Band 2 [4–6 marks] A clear and accurate explanation, showing good sociological knowledge and understanding of how the audience can use social media for interaction. Sociological terms and concepts should be expected e.g. ‘The audience use social media as a forum for creating and maintaining an online identity, seeking likes and approval from others through interaction. They can keep up-to-date with the latest fashion and style as well as cultivating existing relationships and forming new one through the instant messaging systems and video/photo sharing options available to users’. ’This would be followed by explanation of factors leading to this. At the bottom of the band, the range of points covered may be narrow or lack detail. Higher in the band, answers will cover more than one factor in a well-developed way or cover several factors in less detail. 4(d) Explain why the media is an important agency of social control. 8 Candidates need to consider how the media acts as an important agency of social control and may illustrate this with examples. These may be linked with relevant theories and perspectives, but this is not a necessity. Possible answers: • postmodernists believe we now live in a media saturated society with children being digital natives and young people spending hours of every day using the media; • the media shows us what is normal and expected behaviour in society – it norm references for the audience and therefore influences the way we act and think; • imitation – we may copy what we see in the media e.g. style and fashion, therefore this controls us and encourages us to consume particular brands; • role modelling – the audience look up to particular people in the media, be it celebrities, politicians or sports stars. These people can therefore be highly influential in determining how the audience think and behave; • dominant ideologies – these dominate the media and therefore this discourages the audience from considering alternative ways of thinking (Marxism); • new media is interactive therefore has even more potential to control the audience as we are so heavily immersed into the virtual world of social networks, gaming and online communities; • feminism – this theory believes that the media is a patriarchal industry that reinforces gender roles and inequalities in society; • media representations may be seen and believed by the audience and therefore this can be important for determining how the audience see particular social groups and individuals; • other reasonable response. Band 0 [0 marks] No creditworthy response. Band 1 [1–3 marks] Answers in this band will show only a limited awareness of why the media is an important agency of social control. A tendency to description is likely. Responses may be short and undeveloped, e.g. ‘the media shows the audience what is and is not acceptable in society’, stated without explanation. Sociological terms and concepts are unlikely to be used. At the bottom of the band (1 mark), expect one weak point. Higher in the band (2-3 marks), candidates may offer more than one weak point. 4(d) Band 2 [4–6 marks] Answers in this band will show basic sociological knowledge and understanding of why the media is an important agency of social control. Responses may be underdeveloped and lacking in range. e.g. ‘The media sets the agenda for what is topical and important in society. In this way it determines what the audience think about particular issues and events and is often biased in its coverage. The audience may imitate their role models in the media and agree with what they say and do’ etc. At the bottom of the band, candidates are unlikely to use sociological terms and concepts accurately. Higher in the band, candidates may be beginning to use sociological terms and concepts with greater accuracy. However, some aspects of the answer may only be partially developed/explained. Band 3 [7–8 marks] Answers in this band will show good sociological knowledge and understanding of why the media is an important agency of social control and will be well developed and explained. e.g. ‘Postmodernists believe that we now live in a media saturated society in which reality is often determined by the media. This is particularly true of new interactive media that immerses the audience into a media culture. The media typically takes a conservative stance on issues and this norm referencing may influence the audience’s own beliefs too. This is particularly true if, according to the GUMG (Glasgow Uni Media Group), alternative viewpoints that challenge the dominant ideology are marginalised in the media’. They can then expand on the explanation of this and other factors as necessary. Sociological terms and concepts will be used accurately overall. Answers will be well focused on the question and there will be a range of reasons presented. At the top of the band explanations will be clear throughout. 4(e) To what extent does the news reflect reality? 15 Candidates should consider whether the news reflects reality. They may adopt a general approach to the question or may focus on specific forms or examples of news. Answers may be linked to sociological theories and perspectives but this is not a necessity. Possible answers: FOR: • laws of libel and slander protect individuals from unfounded stories therefore ensuring that the news reflects reality; • professional integrity of news professionals alongside codes of content ensure through self-regulation that the news does reflect reality; • laws that prevent the unfair treatment of minority groups exist and ensure that these powerless groups are not misrepresented in the news but instead are reflected fairly; • media gatekeepers may add an angle or a bias to a piece of news journalism but it is still based on fact, it is not fiction; • news values determine the kind of stories that make the news and do lead to some sensationalism and exaggeration in reporting but the stories they cover are still real; • postmodernists and pluralists believe that new media has made the news more democratic, allowing diversity of opinion to be available globally and reducing the dominant ideology so better reflecting reality; • much news today is streamed live as it happens via news agencies, mobile phones and citizen journalism- this is obviously real; • social media allows those involved in a news story a voice to tell their opinions and views so making the news we see more real than ever before, we get a much fuller picture; • many companies are publicly funded and are public service broadcasters – this means that bias must be kept to a minimum as they adopt a stance of due impartiality; • other reasonable response. AGAINST: • fake news stories shows that the news does not always reflect reality; • new media allows for interpretations of events, jokes and social media articles to be made, this distorts what we mean when we say that the news is real; • governments can and do censor the news e.g. in North Korea or in wartime situations via the Official Secrets Act – this means that the news does not always reflect reality; • propaganda is often seen in the news and this distorts reality e.g. Jews were demonised in the German news under Hitler; • a selection process occurs when deciding which news stories should be included in a publication or broadcast – those that make the cut contain news values but other equally important news stories never make it – this clearly does not reflect reality; 4(e) • moral panics turn particular social groups into folk devils as they demonise their behaviour and scapegoat them for society’s problems – this stereotypical and exaggerated reporting does not reflect reality; • the Glasgow University Media Group (GUMG) demonstrated that the news was very biased, adopting a conservative standpoint and presenting stories in a way that placed the ruling class in a favourable light – this kind of distortion does not reflect reality; • Marxists believe that the media generally and the news more specifically are tools of the ruling class used to oppress and exploit the working class – news doesn’t reflect reality therefore, instead it keeps the bourgeoisie in their privileged position and the proletariat in their place; • other reasonable response. Band 0 [0 marks] No creditworthy response. Band 1 [1–4 marks] Answers in this band may be vague and largely based on common sense showing limited knowledge of the extent to which the news reflects reality. Use of sociological terms or concepts is very unlikely. Responses may be short, undeveloped and one-sided. e.g. ‘news professionals are not allowed to lie or make stories up so the news does reflect reality’. Lower in the band (1-2 marks), expect one or two weak points. Higher in the band (3-4 marks) candidates may offer more than two points or provide a weak definition of key terms, e.g. reality is what’s really happening in the news without bias. Band 2 [5–8 marks] In this band candidates will show some basic knowledge of the extent to which the news reflects reality. Alternatively, they may offer an answer which is list-like in nature but there will be no real attempt to assess the issues raised by the question. There may be limited/some use of sociological terms or concepts. Responses may be underdeveloped and lack range. Answers may be simplistic and two-sided responses are unlikely e.g. ‘Stereotypes are easy for the audience to understand so you see a lot of them in the news, perhaps in the form of folk devils and moral panics. This exaggeration does not reflect reality it distorts it’ etc. Lower in the band, the response will be rather narrow in the points covered and there will be little development. Higher in the band, more points will be covered and there will be limited development of some points. Alternatively, a list-like answer with little development covering both sides of the argument may score up to 8 marks. A one-sided answer cannot score higher than 8 marks. 4(e) Band 3 [9–12 marks] Answers in this band will show good sociological knowledge and understanding of the extent to which the news reflects reality. Sociological terms and concepts will be used with greater accuracy and/or frequency. For the most part, answers will be well developed, focused on the question and there will be a range of points presented. Candidates may say that e.g. ‘Despite the content of the news having to reflect reality to some degree it is hard to deny the selection process that takes place by the media gatekeepers to determine what the public see as news and what we never hear about. Decisions are made based on how many news values a story has and therefore how much it will help the story to sell. Fitting in with the dominant ideology and protecting ruling class power may also be on the agenda according to Marxists. These factors mean that the news does not reflect reality at all’. There will be a two-sided response but this may be unbalanced. At the bottom of the band, candidates may provide a narrower range of well-developed points. At the top of the band, expect a wider range of points and clear focus on the question. Band 4 [13–15 marks] Answers in this band will show excellent knowledge and understanding of the extent to which the news reflects reality. There will be a strong grasp of the argument as well as accurate and frequent use of sociological terms and concepts. Answers will be well developed, clearly focused on the question and discuss a wide range of points. Responses will be two-sided and balanced. At the bottom of the band (13 marks), the answer may lack a specific conclusion. Higher in the band, there will be a clear attempt to offer an assessment of the ‘To what extent.?’ part of the question through a focused conclusion. Candidates should show consideration of points for and against the idea of the news reflecting reality, citing some of the examples given.
2 Sociologists debate whether cultural deprivation, labelling and material factors limit educational success. Education is not just about gaining qualifications and measuring intelligence, it also has many other functions such as reinforcing social expectations. (a) What is meant by the term ‘labelling’? [2] (b) Describe two ways social expectations are reinforced in school. [4] (c) Explain how cultural deprivation may be a barrier to educational success. [6] (d) Explain why IQ tests are criticised as a way of measuring intelligence. [8] (e) To what extent do peer groups influence educational achievement? [15] Section C: Crime, deviance and social control
35 marks
Mark scheme: 2(a) What is meant by the term ‘labelling’? 2 One mark for partial definition, e.g. a stereotype. Two marks for clear definition, e.g. defining a person or group in a particular way so that certain behaviour is expected of them. 2(b) Describe two ways social expectations are reinforced in school. 4 Candidates will describe two ways that social expectations are reinforced in school. Candidates are likely to consider the role of education here and so may refer to functionalism and/or Marxism. This is not a necessity however. Possible answers: • education is an agency of secondary socialisation whose ‘role’ is to teach children what society expects of them (the hidden curriculum); • school is an agency of social control so positive sanctions/rewards are used to teach children what the ‘correct’ way to behave and think is; • school as an agency of social control also uses negative sanctions/punishments to ensure that children do not engage in deviant behaviour; • negative sanctions can also act as a deterrent to prevent children straying from the correct path; • Marxists believe that those in power use schools as an agent of the state to control the minds and actions of the future workforce and so make them compliant and obedient; • feminism – gendered subject choice in schools can be seen to reinforce patriarchal expectations in society of the roles of men and women e.g. encouraging females to study ‘communication’ subjects and males technical; • schools can be seen to reinforce a collective culture through shared acts and celebrations e.g. patriotism, learning about the country’s heritage and history etc.; • functionalists believe that education is meritocratic and so at school children learn that through hard work and effort they can achieve their status; • other reasonable response. One mark for each point correctly identified (up to maximum of two). One mark for each point that is developed (up to a maximum of two). 2(c) Explain how cultural deprivation may be a barrier to educational 6 success. Candidates should consider how cultural deprivation may be a barrier to educational success. CULTURAL DEPRIVATION – aspects of the values and attitudes from home of some children prevents them from achieving highly in education. Possible answers: • a fatalistic attitude amongst the working class – not believing that you can change your future if you work hard; • a value placed on immediate rather than deferred gratification – working class being unable to see the benefits of putting off rewards and staying in education; • working class boys are said to have a thrill-seeking culture which may get them into trouble and may lead to the formation of anti-school subcultures; • having parents who do not value education – they may have had a negative experience themselves; • Bourdieu’s cultural capital – not having this capital may be a reason as to why students do not do well in education; • working class loyalty – there is often a sense of community and loyalty within this class culture which may make it seem that valuing something middle class like education is wrong; • there may be a lack of successful family role models who benefited from educational success and so the working class see education as unimportant and unnecessary to their lives; • linguistic codes – some students may lack the language needed to be successful in education e.g. elaborated code (Bernstein); • other reasonable response. Band 0 [0 marks] No creditworthy response. Band 1 [1–3 marks] Answers in this band will show only a limited awareness of how cultural deprivation may be a barrier to educational success and may talk about e.g. ‘if a child’s parent doesn’t think education is important then they won’t either’. Responses may be short and un/under developed. At the bottom of the band (1 mark), expect one weak point. Higher in the band (2–3 marks), candidates may offer more than one weak point, but there may be a tendency towards simplistic answers, engaging with sociological ideas without using sociological language. 2(c) Band 2 [4–6 marks] A clear and accurate explanation, showing good sociological knowledge and understanding of how cultural deprivation may be a barrier to educational success. Sociological terms and concepts should be expected e.g. ‘sociologists believe that there is a fatalistic attitude in the working class whereby they expect immediate gratification. The advantages of putting off rewards by remaining in education and working hard are not seen meaning working class children typically leave school earlier and have fewer educational qualifications than the higher classes.’ This would be followed by explanation of factors leading to this. At the bottom of the band, the range of points covered may be narrow or lack detail. Higher in the band, answers will cover more than one factor in a well-developed way or cover several factors in less detail. 2(d) Explain why IQ tests are criticised as a way of measuring intelligence. 8 Candidates need to explain different reasons why IQ tests are criticised as a way of measuring intelligence. Possible answers: • some people with low scores on IQ tests go on to do well in their education and career whilst those who do well are not always successful in life – is this really an accurate measure of intelligence?; • performance in IQ tests improves with practice – parents often buy in tutors to coach their children. This leads many sociologists to question whether the IQ tests actually do measure intelligence; • how well a person does on an IQ test can be affected by things like illness and anxiety – this therefore can’t be an accurate measure of intelligence; • IQ tests measure ability at just one point in time, intelligence doesn’t work like this. Intelligence develops and changes over time so the IQ tests cannot be accurate; • IQ tests are based on a narrow range of skills – intelligence is far broader than this; • IQ tests are written from a middle class perspective which will inevitably include their cultural biases and assumptions – those not from this culture will therefore always find the test more difficult; • other reasonable response. Band 0 [0 marks] No creditworthy response. Band 1 [1–3 marks] Answers in this band will show only a limited awareness of why IQ tests are criticised as a way of measuring intelligence. A tendency to description is likely. Responses may be short and undeveloped, e.g. ‘the tests are written by the middle class’, stated without explanation. Sociological terms and concepts are unlikely to be used. At the bottom of the band (1 mark), expect one weak point. Higher in the band (2–3 marks), candidates may offer more than one weak point. Band 2 [4–6 marks] Answers in this band will show basic sociological knowledge and understanding of why IQ tests are criticised as a way of measuring intelligence. Responses may be underdeveloped and lacking in range. e.g. ‘IQ tests only measure how much a person can do at one moment in time. They might be unwell or stressed. This means the test may not be an accurate measure of intelligence.’ etc. At the bottom of the band, candidates are unlikely to use sociological terms and concepts accurately. Higher in the band, candidates may be beginning to use sociological terms and concepts with greater accuracy. However, some aspects of the answer may only be partially developed/explained. 2(d) Band 3 [7–8 marks] Answers in this band will show good sociological knowledge and understanding of why IQ tests are criticised as an accurate measure of intelligence and will be well developed and explained. e.g. ‘It has been proven that performance in IQ tests improves with practice as children get used to the styles and demands of the questions. Parents whose children are going to take the test for school selection will want them to practise in order to improve. This is why so many middle class parents buy private tutors to coach their children prior to any selection tests. Marxists believe this is unfair as it advantages middle class children and proves that IQ tests do not measure intelligence if practise can improve scores.’ They can then expand on the explanation of this and other factors as necessary. Sociological terms and concepts will be used accurately overall. Answers will be well focused on the question and there will be a range of reasons presented. At the top of the band explanations will be clear throughout. 2(e) To what extent do peer groups influence educational achievement? 15 Candidates should consider how the peer group are likely to influence educational achievement. In evaluation it is likely that other school, material and cultural factors will also be discussed. Candidates could look at general points or make their ideas specific to such social factors as social class, ethnicity and/or gender. Pupil sub-cultures may also be discussed. Local examples may be used to support points made. Note: please do credit any reference to pupil sub-cultures in candidates answers. Possible answers: FOR • some pupils rebel against the school and develop an alternative set of values, behaviour and attitudes in an anti-school peer group/sub- culture. This will lessen educational achievement; • status frustration – Cohen – some pupils in peer groups who do not have much academic status in school may find their status in other ways e.g. cheeking the teacher, anti-social behaviour etc. This will reduce the chances of educational success; • there may be pressure in schools for boys peer groups to adopt a culture of masculinity which typically does not involve studying and working hard and so may lead to less educational achievement; • Willis ‘the lads’ – this study shows how a peer group of working class boys at school saw no point in working hard and learning at school as they were destined for working class, low paid employment; • middle class peer groups are more likely to be supportive of learning and academic success and so affect pupils educational achievement in a positive way; • some minority ethnic peer groups find school ethnocentric and other pupils may be racist towards them, leading to them being negatively labelled and living up to a self-fulfilling prophecy of failure e.g. Sewell’s study; • Archer – Chinese pupils – this peer group valued education and so worked hard to achieve high levels of educational success; • girls peer groups are more likely to be supportive of education and to value academic success; • Jackson – ‘the ladettes’ – some female peer groups are developing in schools that are based on laddish behaviour as working hard is seen to be ‘uncool’ – this negatively affects educational achievement due to peers; • peer pressure – there is a lot of pressure on pupils to fit in and to conform to the norms of the peer group. This could affect educational achievement either positively or negatively; • other reasonable response. 2(e) AGAINST • the argument that young people are influenced and pressured by their peers is too deterministic – young people make their own choices in education; • material factors such as the ability to buy revision resources, private tutors etc. may influence educational achievement more than the peer group; • the type of school attended may be more influential on educational success than the peer group e.g. the benefits that a private education can bring; • cultural factors may be more important then peer group factors e.g. whether parents value education, having role models in the family who have done well at school etc.; • linguistic factors may be more important than peer group factors e.g. those in the working class and in ethnic minority groups maybe more likely to use the restricted code whereas in education it is the elaborated code (cultivated by the ethnic majority middle classes) that is valued and used; • school factors may be more important than peer group factors e.g. setting and streaming, teacher labelling and expectations; • home factors such as access to the internet, a quiet place to study etc. may influence educational achievement more than the peer group; • the media can be seen to be a reason for lower educational achievement of some pupils e.g. negative role models who do not value education, not the peer group; • other reasonable response. Band 0 [0 marks] No creditworthy response. Band 1 [1–4 marks] Answers in this band may be vague and largely based on common sense showing limited knowledge of the extent to which the peer group influence educational achievement. Use of sociological terms or concepts is very unlikely. Responses may be short, undeveloped and one-sided. e.g. ‘Peer groups pressure pupils to fit in with their behaviour’. Lower in the band (1–2 marks), expect one or two weak points. Higher in the band (3–4 marks) candidates may offer more than two points or provide a weak definition of key terms, e.g. the peer group are the people of a similar age to you. 2(e) Band 2 [5–8 marks] In this band candidates will show some basic knowledge of the extent to which the peer group influence educational achievement. Alternatively, they may offer an answer which is list-like in nature but there will be no real attempt to assess the issues raised by the question. There may be limited/some use of sociological terms or concepts. Responses may be underdeveloped and lack range. Answers may be simplistic and two-sided responses are unlikely e.g. ‘If a pupil comes from an ethnic minority background they may experience racism in school and so rebel against it through their peer group’ etc. Lower in the band, the response will be rather narrow in the points covered and there will be little development. Higher in the band, more points will be covered and there will be limited development of some points. Alternatively, a list-like answer with little development covering both sides of the argument may score up to 8 marks. A one-sided answer cannot score higher than 8 marks. Band 3 [9–12 marks] Answers in this band will show good sociological knowledge and understanding of the extent to which the peer group influence educational achievement. Sociological terms and concepts will be used with greater accuracy and/or frequency. For the most part, answers will be well developed, focused on the question and there will be a range of points presented. Candidates may say that e.g. ‘Despite there being many examples of how peer group factors can affect educational achievement, either negatively through an anti-school sub-culture such as the lads or positively through a pro-school sub-culture, other factors are also influential. It may be, for example, that material factors such as the ability to pay for a private education through economic capital are more important. Marxists would agree with this believing that the education system is not at all meritocratic.’ There will be a two-sided response but this may be unbalanced. At the bottom of the band, candidates may provide a narrower range of well developed points. At the top of the band, expect a wider range of points and clear focus on the question. Band 4 [13–15 marks] Answers in this band will show excellent knowledge and understanding of the extent to which the peer group influence educational achievement. There will be a strong grasp of the argument as well as accurate and frequent use of sociological terms and concepts. Answers will be well developed, clearly focused on the question and discuss a wide range of points. Responses will be two-sided and balanced. At the bottom of the band (13 marks), the answer may lack a specific conclusion. Higher in the band, there will be a clear attempt to offer an assessment of the ‘To what extent.?’ part of the question through a focused conclusion. Candidates should show consideration of points for and against the idea of the peer group influencing educational achievement, citing some of the examples given.
3 Crime rates differ depending upon the type of crime, where it is committed and the way it is measured. The rates of offending and conviction vary depending on the social characteristics of the offender. Many explanations exist for this, including police targeting and the role of the media and new technologies. When crime rates rise governments and the public demand more social control. Some sociologists argue that this will not reduce crime. (a) What is meant by the term ‘targeting’? [2] (b) Describe two ways of measuring crime. [4] (c) Explain how crime can be linked to new technologies. [6] (d) Explain why crime rates for some ethnic groups are higher than others. [8] (e) To what extent can formal social control reduce crime? [15] Section D: Media
35 marks
Mark scheme: 3(a) What is meant by the term ‘targeting’? 2 One mark for partial definition, e.g. police stereotypes. Two marks for clear definition, e.g. when the police focus on a particular group of people, believing them to be more likely to be involved in criminal behaviour than others. 3(b) Describe two ways of measuring crime. 4 Candidates will describe two ways of measuring crime. Specific examples may be used to support the ideas and these may be from a local context. Possible answers: • official statistics – the official government figures from the police and courts to measure the number of crimes and offenders; • self-report studies – research which asks people what crimes they have committed; • victim surveys – research that asks people what crimes they have been victims of; • national victim surveys – as above but done on a national scale e.g. the CSEW to measure patterns of crime within a country; • local victim surveys e.g. left realist research – focused on a local area to find out the reality of crime there for the community; • local victim surveys e.g. feminist – research – focused on a local area to uncover the dark figure of invisible crime; there is a particular focus on sexual assault and domestic abuse; • other reasonable response. One mark for each point correctly identified (up to maximum of two). One mark for each point that is developed (up to a maximum of two). 3(c) Explain how crime can be linked to new technologies. 6 Candidates should show an understanding of how crime can be linked to new technologies. This is likely to be linked to the internet/social media and may refer to specific examples. Possible answers: • cybercrime – crime involving the use of new technologies such as computers; • internet crime – crime involving the use of the internet such as paeodophile rings, catfishing etc; • spreading computer viruses and malware through the internet; • increased possibilities for fraud and identity theft due to the internet e.g. phishing; • internet scams targeting individual users; • websites with obscene or offensive content e.g. the dark web; • harassment by cyberstalking or cyberbullying or trolling via social media; • trade in illegal goods e.g. drugs (internet makes it easier for the buyer and seller to contact each other); • cyberterrorism – using the internet for widespread, deliberate attacks on computer networks; • organised global crime – human trafficking e.g. in child labour, prostitution, slavery via the internet; • other reasonable response. Band 0 [0 marks] No creditworthy response. Band 1 [1–3 marks] Answers in this band will show only a limited awareness of how crime can be linked to new technologies and may talk about e.g. ‘the internet has caused a lot of new crimes to appear such as identity theft’. Responses may be short and un/under developed. At the bottom of the band (1 mark), expect one weak point. Higher in the band (2–3 marks), candidates may offer more than one weak point, but there may be a tendency towards simplistic answers, engaging with sociological ideas without using sociological language. Band 2 [4–6 marks] A clear and accurate explanation, showing good sociological knowledge and understanding of how crime can be linked to new technologies. Sociological terms and concepts should be expected e.g. ‘The internet has created a lot of new crimes that can be spread globally far quicker than ever before. For example, cyberterrorism has emerged where the internet is used for deliberate and widespread attacks on companies or computer groups. These crimes may be committed for political reasons, by activist groups or by lone hackers. The police find it difficult to control such crimes’. This would be followed by explanation of factors leading to this. At the bottom of the band, the range of points covered may be narrow or lack detail. Higher in the band, answers will cover more than one factor in a well-developed way or cover several factors in less detail. 3(d) Explain why crime rates for some ethnic groups are higher than 8 others. Candidates should show an understanding of a range of reasons why crime rates for some ethnic groups are higher than others. It is likely that specific ethnic groups will be referred to and that these will reflect the candidate’s local context. Candidates may approach the question with reasons to explain the offending of particular ethnic groups or by questioning the accuracy of the official crime/conviction rates. Possible answers: • official crime statistics may reflect the biases and prejudices of the police force (Cicourel) in their assumptions about who is more likely to be criminal – police targeting; • some police forces may be institutionally racist (e.g. the McPherson Report) and so deal differently with some ethnic groups than others; • stop and search rates – research shows that these are a lot higher for some ethnic groups e.g. Afro-Caribbeans in the UK than for others; being searched increases the likelihood of arrest; • some ethnic groups are more likely to be involved with gangs than others, hence commit more crime; • most crime is committed by young people – ethnic minorities typically have a higher proportion of young people than the majority group; • victims may be biased – they may be more likely to report a crime committed by an ethnic minority due to their own racial prejudice; • crime by some ethnic groups may be in response to racism in society, a form of resistance to ethnic majority oppression; • marginalisation and relative deprivation – ethnic minority groups share the same goals and aspirations as the majority ethnic group but find it difficult to achieve these goals legitimately; • different norms and values – ethnic groups may have different beliefs than the ethnic majority which may see them engaging in criminal behaviour e.g. polygamy, smoking marijuana etc.; • other reasonable response. Band 0 [0 marks] No creditworthy response. Band 1 [1–3 marks] Answers in this band will show only a limited awareness of why crime rates are higher for some ethnic groups than for others. A tendency to description is likely. Responses may be short and undeveloped, e.g. ‘the police may be racist,’ stated without explanation. Sociological terms and concepts are unlikely to be used. At the bottom of the band (1 mark), expect one weak point. Higher in the band (2–3 marks), candidates may offer more than one weak point. 3(d) Band 2 [4–6 marks] Answers in this band will show basic sociological knowledge and understanding of why crime rates are higher for some ethnic groups than for others. Responses may be underdeveloped and lacking in range. e.g. ‘Some ethnic groups commit more crime because they feel marginalised in society. They may struggle to get a good job and so turn to crime instead as a way to gain material goods’ etc. At the bottom of the band, candidates are unlikely to use sociological terms and concepts accurately. Higher in the band, candidates may be beginning to use sociological terms and concepts with greater accuracy. However, some aspects of the answer may only be partially developed/explained. Band 3 [7–8 marks] Answers in this band will show good sociological knowledge and understanding of why crime rates are higher for some ethnic groups than for others and will be well developed and explained. e.g. ‘Crime rates indicate that some ethnic groups are more criminal than others but is this really the case? Interactionist sociologists refer to the official figures as a social construct as they are believed to show the prejudices of the law enforcement agencies. Police target particular groups of people based on their perception of who is most likely to be criminal and this can often be ethnic minorities, often due to biased media reporting. This then leads to higher stop and search rates and so more arrests. Some police forces have even been called institutionally racist’. They can then expand on the explanation of this and other factors as necessary. Sociological terms and concepts will be used accurately overall. Answers will be well focused on the question and there will be a range of reasons presented. At the top of the band explanations will be clear throughout. 3(e) To what extent can formal social control reduce crime? 15 Candidates should consider the ways formal social control can reduce crime. Informal agents and methods cannot be credited as ‘for’ points. Expect consideration of things like the government, the police, prisons, the army, rules, laws, the judiciary etc. They could talk generally about this formal control or could focus more specifically on specific examples/processes of formal social control. In evaluation the limitations of formal control should be considered. Possible answers: FOR • the government may introduce laws in an attempt to reduce behaviours that they do not find acceptable e.g. theft, murder etc. – people will not want to break the law and so will not offend; • the police are a visible presence and so act as a deterrent to those considering law/rule breaking; • the police have the power of arrest and thus can remove potential criminals from the streets, so reducing crime; • courts can pass sentence on an accused criminal e.g. deciding if they are guilty or innocent and therefore can reduce crime by the sentences that they impose; • the penal system can reduce levels of crime by locking away those in society deemed to be a risk to the public, this reduces crime; • the death penalty is a strong deterrent against crime and in the countries/states where it is legal may be a major reason for reductions in crime; • the armed forces can use physical punishment and weaponry in order to reduce crime – this can be in situations of war, rioting, looting etc.; • formal, written rules and laws ensure that a standardised process to crime is taken meaning that everyone is treated the same, regardless of social position or status; • other reasonable response. AGAINST • recidivism/re-offending is high suggesting that formal methods such as incarceration do not work at reducing crime; • research suggests that prison can act as a ‘university of crime’ teaching those convicted to be better criminals rather than reducing crime; • research shows that high levels of crime occurs within prisons e.g. assaults, attacks, sexual crime, beatings etc; • courts don’t always get their sentencing right e.g. there have been many cases of innocent people being convicted and guilty people walking free, this does not reduce crime; • sometimes the visible presence of the police only serves to antagonise people and so incites crime rather than reducing it; • formal methods and agents of control cannot be that effective or otherwise we would not see such a big problem with crime in societies across the globe; 3(e) • with new technologies now being used to commit crime, the formal methods are less effective at reducing crime than ever before – they do not have the global powers or often the technical skills needed to prevent it; • many sociologists believe that informal methods and agents of control are more effective than formal ones due to the more regular contact and more personal relationships that they involve; • for teenagers many believe it is the peer group who have most influence over whether or not a young person engages in criminal behaviour, not formal control; • functionalist sociologists believe that effective primary socialisation in the family is needed in order to instill the correct norms and values needed to ensure that crime is not committed not formal control; • other reasonable response. Band 0 [0 marks] No creditworthy response. Band 1 [1–4 marks] Answers in this band may be vague and largely based on common sense showing limited knowledge of the extent to which formal social control reduce crime. Use of sociological terms or concepts is very unlikely. Responses may be short, undeveloped and one-sided. e.g. ‘people are scared of going to prison so they don’t commit crime’. Lower in the band (1–2 marks), expect one or two weak points. Higher in the band (3–4 marks) candidates may offer more than two points or provide a weak definition of key terms, e.g. formal social control is ways that the government make people do what they want. Band 2 [5–8 marks] In this band candidates will show some basic knowledge of the extent to which formal social control can reduce crime. Alternatively, they may offer an answer which is list-like in nature but there will be no real attempt to assess the issues raised by the question. There may be limited/some use of sociological terms or concepts. Responses may be underdeveloped and lack range. Answers may be simplistic and two-sided responses are unlikely e.g. ‘Prisons are a good way of reducing crime as people are scared of being locked away and losing their freedom, this makes them stick to the laws rather than offend’ etc. Lower in the band, the response will be rather narrow in the points covered and there will be little development. Higher in the band, more points will be covered and there will be limited development of some points. Alternatively, a list-like answer with little development covering both sides of the argument may score up to 8 marks. A one-sided answer cannot score higher than 8 marks. 3(e) Band 3 [9–12 marks] Answers in this band will show good sociological knowledge and understanding of the extent to which formal social control can reduce crime. Sociological terms and concepts will be used with greater accuracy and/or frequency. For the most part, answers will be well developed, focused on the question and there will be a range of points presented. Candidates may say that e.g. ‘despite formal social control clearly having a role to play in reducing crime, it is not always successful. Rates of re-offending once released from prison are high which suggests that prison doesn’t always work. Prisons themselves have also been accused of being training grounds for criminality, places where criminals can mix together and share offending tips – this does not reduce crime. Crimes committed within prison are also high, again suggesting that this formal agent is not particularly effective at reducing crime’. There will be a two-sided response but this may be unbalanced. At the bottom of the band, candidates may provide a narrower range of well developed points. At the top of the band, expect a wider range of points and clear focus on the question. Band 4 [13–15 marks] Answers in this band will show excellent knowledge and understanding of the extent to which formal social control can reduce crime. There will be a strong grasp of the argument as well as accurate and frequent use of sociological terms and concepts. Answers will be well developed, clearly focused on the question and discuss a wide range of points. Responses will be two-sided and balanced. At the bottom of the band (13 marks), the answer may lack a specific conclusion. Higher in the band, there will be a clear attempt to offer an assessment of the ‘To what extent.?’ part of the question through a focused conclusion. Candidates should show consideration of points for and against the idea of whether formal social control can reduce crime, citing some of the examples given.
2 There are many different types of schools students can attend today, such as private and state schools. Experiences of education and educational achievement vary greatly because of this. Sociologists also debate other reasons for the differing achievements of students at school and believe factors such as money, levels of social control and gender may be important. (a) What is meant by the term ‘state schools’? [2] (b) Describe two school factors, apart from the type of school, that may affect a student’s educational achievement. [4] (c) Explain how social control can be experienced in education. [6] (d) Explain why some boys underachieve in education compared to girls. [8] (e) To what extent is there meritocracy in education? [15] Section C: Crime, deviance and social control
35 marks
Mark scheme: 2(a) What is meant by the term ‘state schools’? One mark for partial definition, e.g. a comprehensive school. Two marks for clear definition, e.g. schools that are run directly or indirectly by the government. this question. 2(b) Describe two school factors, apart from the type of school, that may affect a student’s educational achievement. Possible answers: • good schools have better examination results than bad schools (Rutter), e.g. high expectations of pupils, quality teaching, system of rewards, teacher role models; • teacher expectations – teachers may assume that working class students are less intelligent than higher class students and so they are more likely to be placed in the lower sets which may result in a self-fulfilling prophecy; • teacher expectations – higher class students may be seen as more intelligent by teachers thus are more likely to be in the higher sets and experience the halo effect; • the peer group a student mixes with inside school is likely to affect achievement, e.g. whether the student joins a pro or an anti-school subculture; • Marxists believe the hidden curriculum in schools encourages working class underachievement and vocational rather than academic aspirations; • Becker states that teachers label students – they have a picture in their heads of the ‘ideal student’ and those that match this stereotype are more likely to achieve well in school; • Rosenthal and Jacobson – when teachers believe students are bright they challenge and push them more and so the students achieve higher results; 4 Candidates will describe two school factors that may affect a student’s educational achievement – any that describe home, cultural or linguistic factors should not be credited. Type of school attended should also not be credited. Question Answer Marks Guidance 2(b) • setting and streaming students is seen to limit what they are able to achieve academically; • there may be gendered expectations in school transmitted through the hidden curriculum that may result in gendered subject choice and achievement; • there may be an ethnocentric curriculum in place that alienates certain students and so negatively affects their educational achievement; • other reasonable response. One mark for each point correctly identified (up to a maximum of two). One mark for each point that is developed (up to a maximum of two). 2(c) Explain how social control can be experienced in education. Possible answers: • formal social control – if a student breaks a recognised rule then they can expect to be punished through a series of written sanctions by a teacher; • social control may be physical, such as corporal punishment; • social control may be to do with time, e.g. detentions, isolations and exclusions; • social control can be informal – teachers looks, words and instructions will often ensure the student conforms; • social control can also be exercised in schools through the peer group – peer group pressure, for example. This may result in the formation of pro or anti-school subcultures; • bullying from peers may control students through pressure and coercion; • social control may be through negative sanctions – these act to punish students for their actions and deter them from doing them again; 6 Candidates should consider how social control can be experienced in education/schools. Candidates may refer to informal or formal social control or a combination of the two. Question Answer Marks Guidance 2(c) • social control may be positive through a system of rewards and praise to encourage conformity; • social control can be experienced in different ways according to the gender/ethnicity/class of the student, e.g. boys are more likely to be excluded from school than girls; • other reasonable response. Band 0 [0 marks] No creditworthy response. Band 1 [1–3 marks] Answers in this band will show only a limited awareness of the question. Responses may be short and un/underdeveloped. At the bottom of the band (1 mark), expect one weak point. Higher in the band (2–3 marks), candidates may offer more than one weak point, but there may be a tendency towards simplistic answers, engaging with sociological ideas without using sociological language. Band 2 [4–6 marks] Answers in this band will have clear and accurate explanation, showing good sociological knowledge and understanding. Sociological terms and concepts should be expected and explained. At the bottom of the band, the range of points covered may be narrow or lack detail. Higher in the band, answers will cover more than one point in a well-developed way or cover several points in less detail. Question Answer Marks Guidance 2(d) Explain why some boys underachieve in education compared to girls. Possible answers: • most school work is based on reading and writing whereas boys typically prefer work that is practical and active. Education is therefore thought to be a feminine institution; • with the decline of the primary sector and the feminisation of many secondary sector jobs, some boys may feel that there is little point in trying hard in school when there are no jobs available for them in society; • laddish behaviour – boys may belong to anti-school or anti-learning subcultures in which they think they will lose status in front of their peers if they are seen to be working hard in school (Willis); • social control – girls are still more likely to be heavily socially controlled outside school than boys. Boys are more likely to have later curfews and be outside playing with their friends whereas girls are often found in their bedrooms (McRobbie’s bedroom subculture) which is more conducive to study; • boys are said to be overly confident and so over estimate their own intelligence and abilities, they believe they can do well without trying hard. Girls are typically more likely to underestimate their ability and so work harder to try and be successful; • teachers may treat boys and girls differently in schools, poor behaviour may be more tolerated in boys as teachers think this is ‘normal’ whereas it will be sanctioned if a girl does it. This means boys spend more time not involved in their learning than girls do; • some ethnic minority boys may feel a double pressure – because of both their maleness and their ethnicity. Afro-Caribbean boys, for example, are often involved in hyper-masculine behaviour which goes against all school values and often results in sanctions; • working class students may already suffer from a lack of status in society and so use school as a way of trying to improve their status – through being the class clown or being cheeky to the teacher – Cohen status frustration theory; 8 Candidates need to explain different reasons why some boys underachieve in education compared to girls. Question Answer Marks Guidance 2(d) • girls are still thought by many to be socialised to be more passive than boys, this will then translate to them being more conformist in school and so more likely to do well; • media role models for males often emphasise violence, hyper masculinity and anti-education values which can lead to male under-achievement as compared to girls; • other reasonable response. Band 0 [0 marks] No creditworthy response. Band 1 [1–3 marks] Answers in this band will show only a limited awareness of the question. A tendency to description is likely. Responses may be short and undeveloped and points stated without explanation. Sociological terms and concepts are unlikely to be used. At the bottom of the band (1 mark), expect one weak point. Higher in the band (2–3 marks), candidates may offer more than one weak point. Band 2 [4–6 marks] Answers in this band will show basic sociological knowledge and understanding. Responses may be underdeveloped and lacking in range. At the bottom of the band, candidates are unlikely to use sociological terms and concepts accurately. Higher in the band, candidates may be beginning to use sociological terms and concepts with greater accuracy. However, some aspects of the answer may only be partially developed/explained. Band 3 [7–8 marks] Answers in this band will show good sociological knowledge and understanding and will be well-developed and explained. Sociological terms and concepts will be used accurately overall. Answers will be well-focused on the question and there will be a range of points presented. At the top of the band explanations will be clear throughout. Question Answer Marks Guidance 2(e) To what extent is there meritocracy in education? Arguments for: • in most modern industrial societies education is free giving everyone an equal chance of educational success; • functionalists believe that education is characterised by meritocratic principles whereby those who put the effort in will be rewarded; • educational success is measured by sitting examinations which reward those who have worked and tried hard; • standardised curriculum – e.g. national curriculum – this ensures that all students are taught the same core subjects and content thus making it meritocratic; • success in education mirrors societal values of having a strong work ethic and ensures that it is those most deserving of success, regardless of class, gender or ethnicity, who achieve it; • educational success can improve the life chances of those from poorer backgrounds allowing them upward social mobility as long as they demonstrate a good work ethic; • most educational establishments operate some system of setting and streaming which means that those who work the hardest to achieve their best will be rewarded with challenging lessons and high teacher expectations; • at the opposite end of the spectrum, those who do not take education seriously and do not work hard will find themselves in the bottom sets, sometimes unable to sit a full range of qualifications – this is only fair; • even for private schools that charge fees, bursaries and scholarships are available to those poorer students who have worked hard to achieve well to ensure that they can also access the best education, regardless of family income; • other reasonable response. 15 Candidates are likely to engage with the functionalist theory of education in their ‘For’ arguments. This view can then be criticized in the ‘Against’ section and/or other theoretical explanations can be considered, e.g. Marxist views of meritocracy. Question Answer Marks Guidance 2(e) Arguments against: • the best qualifications are typically gained in private schools, as these are fee paying this cannot be meritocratic; • not all schools receive the same levels of funding, resources or support which means that schools aren’t operating on an equal playing field – they’re not meritocratic; • material deprivation may compromise the notion of meritocracy as not all students can afford private tutors, additional learning resources, internet access, etc.; • feminists argue that in some cultures a boy’s education is prioritised over a girl’s, meaning that boys have greater chances of educational success; • due to teacher stereotypes and expectations some groups of students may be thought to be less capable than others which may result in them being placed in lower sets where they are unable to achieve highly; • an ethnocentric curriculum may mean that ethnic minority students feel alienated from the education system and so don’t have the same chances to be successful; • teachers label some students as bright and others as unintelligent, this can result in a self-fulfilling prophecy or a halo effect – either result is not meritocratic; • education is seen to be a middle class institution based on middle class values and norms – those who possess the most cultural capital are typically the most successful. This is nothing to do with how hard a person works; • schools use an elaborated code in their teaching and assessment which is thought to favour the higher classes who also use this code at home, unlike the lower classes who use a restricted code; • Marxists believe that education is not meritocratic as it benefits the ruling class more than the working class through factors such as private education, the hidden curriculum and unequal economic capital; Question Answer Marks Guidance 2(e) • gender – an examination based system of assessment is thought to favour boys over girls whereas a coursework based system seems to favour girls – this is not meritocratic; • other reasonable response. Band 0 [0 marks] No creditworthy response. Band 1 [1–4 marks] Answers in this band may be vague and largely based on common sense showing limited knowledge of the debate. Use of sociological terms or concepts is very unlikely. Responses may be short, undeveloped and one-sided. Lower in the band (1–2 marks), expect one or two weak points. Higher in the band (3–4 marks) candidates may offer more than two points and provide a weak definition of key terms in the question. Band 2 [5–8 marks] In this band candidates will show some basic knowledge of the debate. Alternatively, they may offer an answer which is list-like in nature but there will be no real attempt to assess the issues raised by the question. There may be limited/some use of sociological terms or concepts. Responses may be underdeveloped and lack range. Answers may be simplistic and two-sided or only cover one side of the debate. Lower in the band, the response may be rather narrow in the points covered and there may be some development. Higher in the band, more points are likely to be covered with some development. Alternatively, a list-like answer with some development covering both sides of the argument may score up to 8 marks. A one-sided answer cannot score higher than 8 marks. Question Answer Marks Guidance 2(e) Band 3 [9–12 marks] Answers in this band will show good sociological knowledge and understanding of the debate. Sociological terms and concepts will be used with greater accuracy and/or frequency. For the most part, answers will be well-developed, focused on the questions and there will be a range of points presented. There will be a two-sided response but it may lack range on one side. At the bottom of the band, candidates may provide a narrower range of developed points. At the top of the band, expect a wider range of developed points and clear focus on the question. Band 4 [13–15 marks] Answers in this band will show excellent knowledge and understanding of the debate. There will be a strong grasp of the arguments as well as accurate and frequent use of sociological terms and concepts. Answers will be well-developed, clearly focused on the question and discuss a wide range of points. Responses will be two-sided and have a range of points on each side. At the bottom of the band (13 marks), the answer may lack a specific conclusion. Higher in the band, there will be a clear attempt to offer an assessment of the ‘To what extent?’ part of the question through a focused conclusion.
3 Who commits crime and why do they do it? This is a question often debated in sociology with different explanations being offered. Factors such as age and ethnicity are considered to be important as are the levels of social control, policing and surveillance in society. Many believe that punishment is essential if governments are to reduce crime. (a) What is meant by the term ‘surveillance’? [2] (b) Describe two sociological explanations for crime. [4] (c) Explain how punishment can reduce crime. [6] (d) Explain why some crimes are not reported to the police. [8] (e) To what extent is age the most influential factor in determining whether an individual commits crime? [15] Section D: Media
35 marks
Mark scheme: 3(a) What is meant by the term ‘surveillance’? One mark for partial definition, e.g. watching people. Two marks for clear definition, e.g. monitoring individuals and groups by governments or other agents such as the police, collecting information with the intention of preventing crime. 3(b) Describe two sociological explanations for crime. Possible answers: • inadequate socialisation – not being taught the correct norms and values of society; • labelling theory – being stereotyped to be criminal and living up to this label (self-fulfilling prophecy); • Marxism – crime is resistance to the upper class exploitation of the working class in society; • material/relative deprivation – not having enough money to buy desired material goods leads to crime; • status frustration – Cohen – a lack of status in society may lead some people to turn to crime; • a search for thrills – postmodernism and edgework (Katz, Lyng); • peer pressure – particularly with young people; juvenile delinquency, gangs etc.; • being in a time of transition characterised by a lack of responsibility, e.g. functionalism and drift theory (Matza); • hegemonic masculinity – pressure on men to be the breadwinner and to prove their masculinity may lead to crime; • other reasonable response. One mark for each point correctly identified (up to a maximum of two). One mark for each point that is developed (up to a maximum of two). 4 Candidates will describe two different sociological explanations for crime. Question Answer Marks Guidance 3(c) Explain how punishment can reduce crime. Possible answers: • financial punishments – the fear of being penalised financially deters people from committing crimes; • incapacitation – punishments that do this prevent crimes from being committed and reduce re-offending rates; • methods of punishment that rehabilitate criminals, e.g. anger management, education and training can all reduce crime; • public humiliation – this can reduce crime through the embarrassment factor that people do not want to experience, either for themselves or for their families causing them not to commit crime; • punishments leading to criminal records can reduce crime as people are aware of the impact this is likely to have on their ability to gain employment; • restorative punishment – having to ‘face your victim’ can reduce crime as it demonstrates the consequences of criminal behaviour and breeds empathy for the victim; • conditional sentencing, e.g. tagging can reduce crime as it imposes restrictions on where people can go and what they can do, limiting the individual’s freedom and ability to commit crime; • capital punishment – the criminal is removed from society and therefore cannot commit crime – it can also act as a public deterrent; • exclusion – prisons take away freedom and thus stop individuals from seeing their families whilst also excluding and isolating them from society – the thought of this reduces/deters crime; • informal punishments, e.g. from family members, can reduce levels of crime as individuals do not want to let their families down and thus do not commit crime or stop committing it; • other reasonable response. 6 Candidates should show an understanding of how punishment can reduce crime. Examples of punishments may also be discussed but in order to be made relevant these need to be linked to the reduction of crime. Question Answer Marks Guidance 3(c) Band 0 [0 marks] No creditworthy response. Band 1 [1–3 marks] Answers in this band will show only a limited awareness of the question. Responses may be short and un/underdeveloped. At the bottom of the band (1 mark), expect one weak point. Higher in the band (2–3 marks), candidates may offer more than one weak point, but there may be a tendency towards simplistic answers, engaging with sociological ideas without using sociological language. Band 2 [4–6 marks] Answers in this band will have clear and accurate explanation, showing good sociological knowledge and understanding. Sociological terms and concepts should be expected and explained. At the bottom of the band, the range of points covered may be narrow or lack detail. Higher in the band, answers will cover more than one point in a well-developed way or cover several points in less detail. Question Answer Marks Guidance 3(d) Explain why some crimes are not reported to the police. Possible answers: • victimless crime – not every crime has a victim and therefore there is no motivation or need to report it to the police, e.g. drug taking; • if people are not aware that they are a victim of crime then they will not report it to the police, e.g. petty theft, child abuse; • certain communities have little trust in the police force and therefore will rarely report crimes to them; • in certain contexts, e.g. gangs, sub-cultures, prisons, crime is a normal part of life and therefore will not be reported to the police; • some crimes are very sensitive and personal, e.g. sexual crimes, abuse, and so victims may be reluctant to report these to the police – feminism; • Marxists talk about how invisible white-collar and corporate crime is as they believe the formal agents act to protect the higher classes from prosecution – companies often deal with these kind of crimes themselves and therefore they are not likely to be reported to the police; • if there is no motivation to report the crime, e.g. the victim does not think anything will be done about it because it is too petty, no insurance claim or there is too little evidence then it is likely to be reported to the police; • some new crimes such as cybercrimes are not reported to the police due to factors like embarrassment, not recognising the act as a crime etc.; • criminals as family members – crimes may not be reported when the criminal is part of a person’s family, they do not want to get them into trouble; • other reasonable response. 8 Candidates should show an understanding of a range of reasons why some crimes are not reported to the police. Points about why the police do not always record crimes or why not all crimes are prosecuted cannot be credited. Question Answer Marks Guidance 3(d) Band 0 [0 marks] No creditworthy response. Band 1 [1–3 marks] Answers in this band will show only a limited awareness of the question. A tendency to description is likely. Responses may be short and undeveloped and points stated without explanation. Sociological terms and concepts are unlikely to be used. At the bottom of the band (1 mark), expect one weak point. Higher in the band (2–3 marks), candidates may offer more than one weak point. Band 2 [4–6 marks] Answers in this band will show basic sociological knowledge and understanding. Responses may be underdeveloped and lacking in range. At the bottom of the band, candidates are unlikely to use sociological terms and concepts accurately. Higher in the band, candidates may be beginning to use sociological terms and concepts with greater accuracy. However, some aspects of the answer may only be partially developed/explained. Band 3 [7–8 marks] Answers in this band will show good sociological knowledge and understanding and will be well-developed and explained. Sociological terms and concepts will be used accurately overall. Answers will be well-focused on the question and there will be a range of points presented. At the top of the band explanations will be clear throughout. Question Answer Marks Guidance 3(e) To what extent is age the most influential factor in determining whether an individual commits crime? Arguments for: • according to the official crime statistics youths commit a high proportion of crime – police therefore target them which may lead to youths living up to the negative label and committing more crime (self-fulfilling prophecy); • some offences committed by young people are ‘status crimes’ – only criminal because of their age; • Matza’s drift theory says that petty offending is just a normal part of growing up so it’s not surprising young people commit a lot of these crimes; • postmodernists talk about the thrill of committing crimes as being particularly appealing to the young – edgework, Katz and Lyng; • functionalism – they see adolescence as a period of transition in which young people ‘test the boundaries’ thus making criminal/deviant behaviour quite likely; • young people are more likely than adults to be part of criminal sub- cultures and gangs – in these contexts committing crime is expected and often necessary to prove your loyalty, e.g. initiation ceremonies; • young people are more subject to peer pressure than older people and so may commit more crime; • young people are typically more ‘media technology savvy’ and thus have the skills to commit cybercrimes that the older generations do not; • young people typically have fewer responsibilities than older age groups and in this sense have less to lose from committing crime; • if young people are not successful in school they may resist authority and turn to a delinquent lifestyle for their status instead – Cohen (status frustration); 15 The ‘Against’ arguments may consider flaws in the ‘age is important’ arguments and/or consider other social factors as being more influential, e.g. gender, ethnicity and social class. Question Answer Marks Guidance 3(e) • middle aged people may have opportunities to commit crime in their everyday work role, e.g. white-collar/corporate crimes; • functionalists believe that as older people disengage from society there will be less opportunities for them to commit crime; • the elderly do not fit Cicourel’s stereotype of the typical delinquent and so are unlikely to be targeted or suspected by the police meaning they are able to get away with crime; • other reasonable response. Arguments against: • not every young person commits crime and not every elderly person is law abiding – age may be a relevant factor but it does not determine criminality; • gender may be more important than age – males are under pressure to be masculine, to be the provider and to have high status – this may all lead to criminal behaviour; • ethnicity may be more important then age – resistance to racism may cause some ethnic minorities to commit crime as they feel marginalised from mainstream society; • social class may be more important than age – material deprivation and Merton’s strain theory may better explain why some people turn to crime; • age is more likely to intersect with other social factors rather than be a singular determining factor – for example, a high amount of crime is committed by young, working class males; • the social context needs to be considered – in Japan, for example, elderly crime is growing and the over 65 category now commit approximately 15% of all the country’s crimes due to Japan’s increasing economic problems; • the official crime statistics may hide the true amount of crime by age groups other than youths, e.g. Marxists believe most white-collar criminals do not get prosecuted – typically older adults; • other reasonable response. Question Answer Marks Guidance 3(e) Band 0 [0 marks] No creditworthy response. Band 1 [1–4 marks] Answers in this band may be vague and largely based on common sense showing limited knowledge of the debate. Use of sociological terms or concepts is very unlikely. Responses may be short, undeveloped and one-sided. Lower in the band (1–2 marks), expect one or two weak points. Higher in the band (3–4 marks) candidates may offer more than two points and provide a weak definition of key terms in the question. Band 2 [5–8 marks] In this band candidates will show some basic knowledge of the debate. Alternatively, they may offer an answer which is list-like in nature but there will be no real attempt to assess the issues raised by the question. There may be limited/some use of sociological terms or concepts. Responses may be underdeveloped and lack range. Answers may be simplistic and two-sided or only cover one side of the debate. Lower in the band, the response may be rather narrow in the points covered and there may be some development. Higher in the band, more points are likely to be covered with some development. Alternatively, a list-like answer with some development covering both sides of the argument may score up to 8 marks. A one-sided answer cannot score higher than 8 marks. Band 3 [9–12 marks] Answers in this band will show good sociological knowledge and understanding of the debate. Sociological terms and concepts will be used with greater accuracy and/or frequency. For the most part, answers will be well-developed, focused on the questions and there will be a range of points presented. There will be a two-sided response but it may lack range on one side. At the bottom of the band, candidates may provide a narrower range of developed points. At the top of the band, expect a wider range of developed points and clear focus on the question. Question Answer Marks Guidance 3(e) Band 4 [13–15 marks] Answers in this band will show excellent knowledge and understanding of the debate. There will be a strong grasp of the arguments as well as accurate and frequent use of sociological terms and concepts. Answers will be well-developed, clearly focused on the question and discuss a wide range of points. Responses will be two-sided and have a range of points on each side. At the bottom of the band (13 marks), the answer may lack a specific conclusion. Higher in the band, there will be a clear attempt to offer an assessment of the ‘To what extent?’ part of the question through a focused conclusion.
4 The media today can be split into two types, traditional and new media. Both can have positive and negative effects on the audience. Content and censorship are often different depending on which type of media is being discussed and who the media gatekeeper is. Despite this, stereotypical representations of some social groups exist in all types of media. (a) What is meant by the term ‘new media’? [2] (b) Describe two stereotypical representations of men in the media today. [4] (c) Explain how postmodernists view new media. [6] (d) Explain why the media can have a negative effect on children. [8] (e) To what extent do media gatekeepers control the content of the media? [15]
35 marks
Mark scheme: 4(a) What is meant by the term ‘new media’? One mark for partial definition, e.g. the internet. Two marks for clear definition, e.g. digital technologies/platforms involving greater interactivity. 2 4(b) Describe two stereotypical representations of men in the media today. Possible answers: • the provider – men are shown to be the breadwinner; • the protector/hero – men are shown to protect women and children; • physical strength – men are shown to be the stronger sex; • the criminal – men are shown in this law breaking role; • the hegemonic male – an extreme form of what traditional men are meant to be like; • new stereotypes of the ‘new man’ – mixing fatherhood with paid employment; • new stereotype of the metrosexual man, e.g. fashion, style, city based; 4 Question Answer Marks Guidance 4(b) • the homosexual man – effeminate, fashion conscious etc.; • other reasonable response. One mark for each point correctly identified (up to a maximum of two). One mark for each point that is developed (up to a maximum of two). 4(c) Explain how postmodernists view new media. Possible answers: • they believe that new media is more interactive than ever before – a two-way process; • new media is harder for Governments/corporations to control than ever before meaning there are fewer possibilities for a dominant ideology to be conveyed; • new media is global – in terms of ownership, content and audience; • postmodernists believe that diversification is made more significant with new media as companies expand into several different areas of the media industry rather than specialising in just one; • convergence – postmodernists believe this has gained significance with new media as technologies become multi-functional, e.g. someone can email, text, access social media, watch videos, all from a mobile phone; • social media has grown hugely in popularity and significance, being a core influence upon social identity, particularly for young people; • new media is characterised by diversity meaning the old ways of doing things have disappeared offering the audience more choice in what they consume and the devices that they choose to use for this; • postmodernists believe new media sees the audience as being at the very core of it – as prosumers and citizen journalists, producing new media content; 6 Candidates need to show an understanding of different ways that postmodernists view new media. Examples from an international, national or local context may be included, these should be credited accordingly if used correctly. Question Answer Marks Guidance 4(c) • postmodernists believe new media allows for more specialist and niche programming to be made and consumed, not just mass appeal material; • postmodernists see new media as internet based and thus it operates on multiple platforms, unlike traditional media; • other reasonable response. Band 0 [0 marks] No creditworthy response. Band 1 [1–3 marks] Answers in this band will show only a limited awareness of the question. Responses may be short and un/underdeveloped. At the bottom of the band (1 mark), expect one weak point. Higher in the band (2–3 marks), candidates may offer more than one weak point, but there may be a tendency towards simplistic answers, engaging with sociological ideas without using sociological language. Band 2 [4–6 marks] Answers in this band will have clear and accurate explanation, showing good sociological knowledge and understanding. Sociological terms and concepts should be expected and explained. At the bottom of the band, the range of points covered may be narrow or lack detail. Higher in the band, answers will cover more than one point in a well-developed way or cover several points in less detail. Question Answer Marks Guidance 4(d) Explain why the media can have a negative effect on children. Possible answers: • copycat negative behaviour – children may copy what they see/hear in the media, e.g. violence, swearing; • desensitised to violence in real life – this means they no longer feel shocked or negatively about real life violence; • hypodermic needle model – the media has an immediate and direct effect on the audience meaning children are very vulnerable to any negative effects (Bandura); • body image – the media sets the agenda for what is considered as normal, it has been heavily criticised for leading to health problems such as anorexia, e.g. the size zero debate; • new media is very difficult to control meaning that traditional protectors for children such as the TV watershed and age certificates no longer control what children can and cannot consume; • internet streaming means that media content is available on many different platforms so that parents do not know what children are engaging with; many are watching adult content that is thought to be unsuitable for children; • the rise of social media sites and the increase in ownership of devices such as smartphones and laptops means that children often access unsuitable media content for hours on their own everyday; • new media has been accused of making child grooming and exploitation far easier through the use of the internet; • Neil Postman – ‘loss of innocence and the disappearance of childhood‘ – the media is highly sexualised and allows children access to adult materials and lifestyles that can have negative effects on children; • advertising is everywhere and this can be seen to be negative for children as it leads them to believe that consumer items are necessary to be happy; • the rise of new media and social networking could lead to cyberbullying and peer pressure; 8 Candidates may consider the varying ways that the media can be said to have a negative effect on children. This can be through content or usage. These may be linked with relevant theories and perspectives but this is not a necessity. Question Answer Marks Guidance 4(d) • video game culture – some children may spend so much of their time playing video games that they become uninterested in schoolwork and/or socially isolated; • other reasonable response. Band 0 [0 marks] No creditworthy response. Band 1 [1–3 marks] Answers in this band will show only a limited awareness of the question. A tendency to description is likely. Responses may be short and undeveloped and points stated without explanation. Sociological terms and concepts are unlikely to be used. At the bottom of the band (1 mark), expect one weak point. Higher in the band (2–3 marks), candidates may offer more than one weak point. Band 2 [4–6 marks] Answers in this band will show basic sociological knowledge and understanding. Responses may be underdeveloped and lacking in range. At the bottom of the band, candidates are unlikely to use sociological terms and concepts accurately. Higher in the band, candidates may be beginning to use sociological terms and concepts with greater accuracy. However, some aspects of the answer may only be partially developed/explained. Band 3 [7–8 marks] Answers in this band will show good sociological knowledge and understanding and will be well-developed and explained. Sociological terms and concepts will be used accurately overall. Answers will be well-focused on the question and there will be a range of points presented. At the top of the band explanations will be clear throughout. Question Answer Marks Guidance 4(e) To what extent do media gatekeepers control the content of the media? Arguments for: • editors select which stories make the media and which do not; • owners determine the accepted ideologies and stance of the media company/product, e.g. politically; • huge media conglomerates like Disney control today’s media content in a search for profits through entertainment and merchandise; • journalists decide upon the slant and biases that a story in the media will take; • gatekeepers are influenced by expected news values/the idea of newsworthiness which will determine which stories make the news and which do not; • gatekeepers determine agenda setting as they decide which stories will be talked about and which will be sidelined; • the government act as gatekeepers through legal acts such as the official secrets act, so determining what is allowed to be broadcast and what is not; • censors act as gatekeepers as they allow some things into the media and ban other things; • new media – e.g. Twitter and Facebook – content is monitored constantly and things that infringe guidelines are removed; • other reasonable response. Arguments against: • the internet and new media is less regulated meaning that media gatekeepers can no longer control the content of the media; • advertising companies rather than media gatekeepers control the content of the media as the media today is a commercial enterprise that must appeal to the demands of advertising in order to be successful; 15 Candidates should discuss how media gatekeepers can control the content of the media. They could also, in evaluation, consider how possible this really is in the new media world as well as looking at other possible sources of control over media content other than the gatekeepers. Gatekeeper – the ability of individuals to control access to and content of the media for the audience. Question Answer Marks Guidance 4(e) • the audience create their own media today through citizen journalism and uploading content to sites such as YouTube; • audience interactivity means that the power of media gatekeepers is no longer very influential as an active discussion can take place on what has been presented which is audience driven; • social media is largely unregulated and content is largely audience driven, meaning that media gatekeepers do not control the content; • immediacy of the media today means that media gatekeepers are unlikely to be able to control media content as it is ‘out there’ and spread virally so quickly; • vloggers/Youtubers operating within new media control media content today, not the media gatekeepers; they are so influential in determining what young people are talking and thinking about; • other reasonable response. Band 0 [0 marks] No creditworthy response. Band 1 [1–4 marks] Answers in this band may be vague and largely based on common sense showing limited knowledge of the debate. Use of sociological terms or concepts is very unlikely. Responses may be short, undeveloped and one-sided. Lower in the band (1–2 marks), expect one or two weak points. Higher in the band (3–4 marks) candidates may offer more than two points and provide a weak definition of key terms in the question. Band 2 [5–8 marks] In this band candidates will show some basic knowledge of the debate. Alternatively, they may offer an answer which is list-like in nature but there will be no real attempt to assess the issues raised by the question. There may be limited/some use of sociological terms or concepts. Question Answer Marks Guidance 4(e) Responses may be underdeveloped and lack range. Answers may be simplistic and two-sided or only cover one side of the debate. Lower in the band, the response may be rather narrow in the points covered and there may be some development. Higher in the band, more points are likely to be covered with some development. Alternatively, a list-like answer with some development covering both sides of the argument may score up to 8 marks. A one-sided answer cannot score higher than 8 marks. Band 3 [9–12 marks] Answers in this band will show good sociological knowledge and understanding of the debate. Sociological terms and concepts will be used with greater accuracy and/or frequency. For the most part, answers will be well-developed, focused on the questions and there will be a range of points presented. There will be a two-sided response but it may lack range on one side. At the bottom of the band, candidates may provide a narrower range of developed points. At the top of the band, expect a wider range of developed points and clear focus on the question. Band 4 [13–15 marks] Answers in this band will show excellent knowledge and understanding of the debate. There will be a strong grasp of the arguments as well as accurate and frequent use of sociological terms and concepts. Answers will be well-developed, clearly focused on the question and discuss a wide range of points. Responses will be two-sided and have a range of points on each side. At the bottom of the band (13 marks), the answer may lack a specific conclusion. Higher in the band, there will be a clear attempt to offer an assessment of the ‘To what extent?’ part of the question through a focused conclusion.
2 The education system uses sanctions and rewards which many sociologists consider to be as important as teaching knowledge and skills and gaining qualifications. Sociologists also debate whether all students have the same chance to be successful. This debate often focuses on factors such as language, subject choice and material factors. (a) What is meant by the term ‘sanctions’? [2] (b) Describe two ways students’ subject choice can be influenced by gender. [4] (c) Explain how linguistic influences from the family can affect educational achievement. [6] (d) Explain why material factors can influence educational success. [8] (e) To what extent does private education challenge the functionalist view that education is meritocratic? [15] Section C: Crime, deviance and social control
35 marks
Mark scheme: 2(a) What is meant by the term ‘sanctions’? One mark for partial definition, e.g. punishment. Two marks for clear definition, e.g. any way in which children are reprimanded or receive something negative for something they have done. 2 Examples are likely to be used in this question. 2(b) Describe two ways students’ subject choice can be influenced by gender. Possible answers: • male subject choice – boys are more likely to select physical or higher status subjects such as P.E., Woodwork, Business Studies, Economics – often linked to the breadwinner role; • female subject choice – girls are more likely to select communication based/expressive subjects often seen as ‘softer’, e.g. Health and Social Care, Sociology, Sewing, Cooking – often linked to the domestic role; • vocational education – manual work and sport is perceived as being ‘for males’ and beauty/caring courses for females; • the family – socialisation here may still be different according to gender (e.g. Oakley’s work on manipulation/canalisation) which would then influence students in the subjects they chose at school; • teacher expectations/labelling – teachers may influence student subject choice through acting as role models, conversations with students, setting, etc.; • peer pressure – males are pressured by their peer group to choose masculine subjects such as P.E., whereas girls may be pressured into more feminine subjects such as Health and Social care – fear of negative sanctions; • careers advice – advisors may suggest particular subjects to support particular careers which are often influenced by gender, e.g. expressive subjects if you want to work with people; 4 Candidates will describe two different ways that students’ subject choice can be influenced by gender. Candidates may describe the subjects chosen by males and/or females and link this to gender or consider what influences students to make these choices, e.g. family, teachers. Either way is fine to credit. Question Answer Marks Guidance 2(b) • textbook representations – textbooks may still be heavily stereotyped when it comes to gender representations, e.g. girls reading books, boys using ICT; • type of school attended – attending a single sex school may reduce gender bias when it comes to a student’s subject choice; • science labs – research shows that these are typically dominated by males (students and teachers) and therefore this may influence male students to choose science and female students not to; • any other reasonable response. One mark for each point correctly identified (up to a maximum of two). One mark for each point that is developed (up to a maximum of two). Question Answer Marks Guidance 2(c) Explain how linguistic influences from the family can affect educational achievement. Possible answers: • social class – Bernstein – the higher classes are likely to use the school language of the elaborated code at home with the family and therefore it is easy to transfer this linguistic code to school; • social class – Bernstein – the lower classes are more likely to be socialised through the restricted code which is the opposite to that which is required and valued at school thus making achievement more difficult; • ethnic minorities may be brought up with a different first language than that used at school, that makes achievement more difficult; • dual language – being brought up knowing more than one language (bilingualism, for example) can often advantage the student in education, e.g. in an international school where the home language may not be the language of the classroom or the examination; • certain cultures may use a form of dialect such as patois as a way of communicating, e.g. Jamaicans. This is alien to the school culture and so makes achievement more difficult; • the kind of language used by ethnic minorities (Labov) may be thought by teachers to be wrong and ungrammatical thus causing them to label those students as ‘unintelligent’. They may end up in lower sets and thus be less successful in school; • teacher labelling – students who are not perceived to communicate ‘well’ in schools because of the language used at home may be judged as less bright by their teachers – this can be de-motivating and thus negatively affect achievement; • any other reasonable response. 6 Candidates should consider how linguistic influences (language) from home and the family can affect how well an individual does at school. It is likely that social class and/or ethnicity will be the focus of the response, but this needs to be linked (at least implicitly) to educational achievement. Question Answer Marks Guidance 2(c) Band 0 [0 marks] No creditworthy response. Band 1 [1–3 marks] Answers in this band will show only a limited awareness of the question. Responses may be short and un/underdeveloped. At the bottom of the band (1 mark), expect one weak point. Higher in the band (2–3 marks), candidates may offer more than one weak point, but there may be a tendency towards simplistic answers, engaging with sociological ideas without using sociological language. Band 2 [4–6 marks] Answers in this band will have clear and accurate explanation, showing good sociological knowledge and understanding. Sociological terms and concepts should be expected and explained. At the bottom of the band, the range of points covered may be narrow or lack detail. Higher in the band, answers will cover more than one point in a well-developed way or cover several points in less detail. Question Answer Marks Guidance 2(d) Explain why material factors can influence educational success. Possible answers: • examination results are typically highest in private schools – only the rich can afford for their children to attend these elite schools; • some schools have more funding than others which can affect the amount and quality of resources and thus affect educational success; • home factors – if the family home is overcrowded and living conditions are not great, lower class students may find it difficult to study effectively; • those from lower income families may not be able to afford to participate in the extra-curricular activities and visits that a school offers, so missing out on opportunities to gain the capital thought to be so important for educational success; • inadequate diet – not everyone can afford the more expensive fresh food and diet is thought to be a major influence on an individual’s educational success; • poorer students may have to combine part time jobs with studying at school in order to help their families, this makes achieving highly far more difficult; • poorer families may not be able to support their children through university so perhaps limiting their educational success; • if a child has not gone to preschool education (often has to be paid for) then she/he may start primary education already at an educational disadvantage to those richer children who have had this experience; • richer parents can buy in private tutors and additional resources to try and boost their child’s educational performance in selection tests and external examinations; • any other reasonable response. 8 Candidates need to explain different reasons why material factors (money) can influence educational success. Candidates may well focus on social class within their answers (higher class advantage and/or lower class disadvantage) these are fine to credit. Question Answer Marks Guidance 2(d) Band 0 [0 marks] No creditworthy response. Band 1 [1–3 marks] Answers in this band will show only a limited awareness of the question. A tendency to description is likely. Responses may be short and undeveloped and points stated without explanation. Sociological terms and concepts are unlikely to be used. At the bottom of the band (1 mark), expect one weak point. Higher in the band (2–3 marks), candidates may offer more than one weak point. Band 2 [4–6 marks] Answers in this band will show basic sociological knowledge and understanding. Responses may be underdeveloped and lacking in range. At the bottom of the band, candidates are unlikely to use sociological terms and concepts accurately. Higher in the band, candidates may be beginning to use sociological terms and concepts with greater accuracy. However, some aspects of the answer may only be partially developed/explained. Band 3 [7–8 marks] Answers in this band will show good sociological knowledge and understanding and will be well-developed and explained. Sociological terms and concepts will be used accurately overall. Answers will be well- focused on the question and there will be a range of points presented. At the top of the band explanations will be clear throughout. Question Answer Marks Guidance 2(e) To what extent does private education challenge the functionalist view that education is meritocratic? Arguments for: • private education gets better results and is fee paying – this excludes some students from being able to attend; • private schools operate the old boys network and so make it easier for some students to access elite jobs and experiences than others – social capital; • private schools attract the best paid and best qualified teachers therefore this, alongside small class sizes, makes private education superior – this is not meritocratic; • private schools according to Marxists foster a culture of elitism, making those that attend feel they are superior to others because of their wealth, education and status; • top universities in the world are dominated by private school students, e.g. Cambridge and Oxford in the UK which seems to suggest that a private education results in improved life chances; • studies show that there is a correlation between a person achieving a well-paid, elite, high status job in society and their attendance at a private school, this is not meritocratic; • Marxists believe private schools are a tool of the state that exists in order to ensure that the higher classes pass on their privileges to their children so resulting in social closure; • many private schools are single sex and may reflect the gendered culture of the society meaning that one gender has improved life chances over the other; • private schools typically operate an interview policy with parents and students as part of the selection process. Those from the higher classes are more likely to get through this procedure as they already have the elaborated code and cultural capital (Bourdieu) that is so highly valued by private schools; • any other reasonable response. 15 Candidates are likely to outline functionalist views of education looking at the positive factors and meritocracy. This can then be evaluated with alternative explanations such as Marxism. Relevant points may also be made that are not linked to a specific theory, such as the benefits of private education – these are still fine to credit. Question Answer Marks Guidance 2(e) Arguments against: • private schools all offer scholarships and bursaries to ensure that those intelligent students from poorer backgrounds are able to attend; • curriculum – the (national) curriculum is standardised across different types of school and therefore what a pupil is taught is the same regardless of which type of school is attended – this is meritocratic; • compensatory education schemes and positive discrimination means that in some circumstances a poorer student has a better chance of being accepted to a private school than a higher class student regardless of their intelligence or test scores; • in private schools, teachers do not necessarily have to be qualified and therefore it may well be that students that attend these types of schools actually receive a worse quality education than that provided by the state; • competition exists even within a private school – in order to achieve success hard work and effort is still required, i.e. meritocracy; • it is actually meritocratic that the best students are offered the best opportunities for success in private schools (role allocation or sifting and sorting); • in a postmodern society characterised by diversity, private schools sit alongside many other different types of schools as just another option for parents and students – there are educational institutions to suit everybody today; • students who work hard at school will do well and be duly rewarded regardless of the type of school attended; • it is only a minority of students that receive a private education – most students will be educated in the state/comprehensive system which is meritocratic as all students can be admitted; • any other reasonable response. Question Answer Marks Guidance 2(e) Band 0 [0 marks] No creditworthy response. Band 1 [1–4 marks] Answers in this band may be vague and largely based on common sense showing limited knowledge of the debate. Use of sociological terms or concepts is very unlikely. Responses may be short, undeveloped and one-sided. Lower in the band (1–2 marks), expect one or two weak points. Higher in the band (3–4 marks) candidates may offer more than two points and provide a weak definition of key terms in the question. Band 2 [5–8 marks] In this band candidates will show some basic knowledge of the debate. Alternatively, they may offer an answer which is list-like in nature but there will be no real attempt to assess the issues raised by the question. There may be limited/some use of sociological terms or concepts. Responses may be underdeveloped and lack range. Answers may be simplistic and two-sided or only cover one side of the debate. Lower in the band, the response may be rather narrow in the points covered and there may be some development. Higher in the band, more points are likely to be covered with some development. Alternatively, a list-like answer with some development covering both sides of the argument may score up to 8 marks. A one-sided answer cannot score higher than 8 marks. Band 3 [9–12 marks] Answers in this band will show good sociological knowledge and understanding of the debate. Sociological terms and concepts will be used with greater accuracy and/or frequency. For the most part, answers will be well-developed, focused on the question and there will be a range of points presented. There will be a two-sided response, but it may lack range on one side. At the bottom of the band, candidates may provide a narrower range of developed points. At the top of the band, expect a wider range of developed points and a clear focus on the question. Question Answer Marks Guidance 2(e) Band 4 [13–15 marks] Answers in this band will show excellent knowledge and understanding of the debate. There will be a strong grasp of the arguments as well as accurate and frequent use of sociological terms and concepts. Answers will be well-developed, clearly focused on the question and discuss a wide range of points. Responses will be two-sided and have a range of points on each side. At the bottom of the band (13 marks), the answer may lack a specific conclusion. Higher in the band, there will be a clear attempt to offer an assessment of the ‘To what extent?’ part of the question through a focused conclusion.
3 Why do some peer groups and individuals not conform to social norms and laws? There is no simple answer to this question. Some factors which sociologists have identified as being relevant include a lack of opportunity and inadequate socialisation. As a response to the problem of crime, policing strategies aim to reduce the crime rate to keep individuals and society safe. (a) What is meant by the term ‘peer group’? [2] (b) Describe two policing strategies that aim to reduce crime. [4] (c) Explain how white-collar crime is treated differently to other crimes. [6] (d) Explain why a lack of opportunity may lead to crime. [8] (e) To what extent can inadequate socialisation explain criminal behaviour? [15] Section D: Media
35 marks
Mark scheme: 3(a) What is meant by the term ‘peer group’? One mark for partial definition, e.g. friends. Two marks for clear definition, e.g. a group that individuals identify with because they share characteristics such as age and/or status. 2 3(b) Describe two policing strategies that aim to reduce crime. Possible answers: • police targeting – when they focus on particular groups that they believe are more likely to be involved in criminal behaviour; • armed police/military policing – this acts as a source of fear and deterrence to criminals; • community policing – getting to know and be trusted by the community can be effective in preventing crime; • police presence in public places – this acts as a deterrent to crime as people are fearful of being caught and arrested; • surveillance – this can be through CCTV or computers/the internet/video or a physical presence; • zero tolerance policing – harsh policing tactics in order to send out a clear message about what will happen if a person commits crime; • arrest – the police have the power to arrest suspected criminals with the aim of reducing crime; • stop and search – the police use this strategy in order to target certain social groups and to reduce crime through deterrence and the search process, e.g. finding someone carrying drugs; • police force/coercion – more physical tactics can sometimes be used by the police, e.g. pepper spray, tasers, violence, in order to prevent crime being committed and so reduce crime; • police issued fines – e.g. speeding fines can be used with the aim to reduce crime – deterrence; • any other reasonable response. One mark for each point correctly identified (up to a maximum of two). One mark for each point that is developed (up to a maximum of two). 4 Candidates will describe two different policing strategies that aim to reduce crime. These must refer to the police, not to punishments/prisons generally. Question Answer Marks Guidance 3(c) Explain how white-collar crime is treated differently to other crimes. Possible answers: • Marxists believe there is a large dark figure of white-collar crime in the OCS because middle class crime is less likely to be recorded than working class crime; • white-collar crimes are often not perceived as criminal or serious therefore it is more likely for them not to be reported to the authorities than non-white-collar crimes; • white-collar crimes committed in the workplace are often dealt with by the company rather than making it a police matter like with other types of crimes; • Marxists believe that white-collar criminals are more likely to get away with their crimes than other working-class criminals; • Marxists believe that the judiciary are more lenient with white-collar criminals than they are with ‘regular’ crimes and criminals as white- collar criminals do not fit the ‘typical delinquent’ stereotype; • white-collar crimes may not be recorded in the OCS because companies prefer to avoid the negative publicity brought about by a public case so an employee caught committing fraud may just be dismissed – this is unlikely to happen with non-white-collar crimes; • white-collar, higher class criminals are often more skilled at negotiating the criminal justice system than the working class, knowing their rights and having the money and connections to employ a good legal team; • research, e.g. that by Tombs and White shows that few cases of serious white-collar crimes are investigated by the police – only 5% of major (often fatal) workplace accidents for example – this is not the case for other types of crimes; • large global multinationals are difficult to deal with if they commit a criminal offence because they can use their size, power and connections to evade the law, e.g. by transferring money within their companies to avoid taxes – this is very different to street crimes, for example; 6 Candidates should show an understanding of what is meant by white collar/corporate crime. They should then consider how these kinds of crimes are dealt with differently to other crimes. This may involve discussion of Marxist theory. Examples may also be discussed. Question Answer Marks Guidance 3(c) • media reporting – the media tends to focus on more sensationalist, newsworthy crimes meaning that white-collar crimes are frequently under-reported and thus not perceived as a social problem; • any other reasonable response. Band 0 [0 marks] No creditworthy response. Band 1 [1–3 marks] Answers in this band will show only a limited awareness of the question. Responses may be short and un/underdeveloped. At the bottom of the band (1 mark), expect one weak point. Higher in the band (2–3 marks), candidates may offer more than one weak point, but there may be a tendency towards simplistic answers, engaging with sociological ideas without using sociological language. Band 2 [4–6 marks] Answers in this band will have clear and accurate explanation, showing good sociological knowledge and understanding. Sociological terms and concepts should be expected and explained. At the bottom of the band, the range of points covered may be narrow or lack detail. Higher in the band, answers will cover more than one point in a well-developed way or cover several points in less detail. Question Answer Marks Guidance 3(d) Explain why a lack of opportunity may lead to crime. Possible answers: • Merton’s strain theory – people commit crime because they want material goods and success, but cannot achieve these legitimately due to a lack of opportunity in society; • Cloward and Ohlin – illegitimate opportunity structure. This theory shows how when people cannot access legitimate opportunities in society they take illegitimate ones instead; • material/relative deprivation – if people do not have enough money as others around them and no opportunity to change this in mainstream society then they may turn to crime; • unemployment – not having a job is a source of frustration and resentment and thus may push some individuals into adopting a deviant career as they do not have other opportunities in life; • gangs – some individuals, particularly those from less powerful groups, e.g. ethnic minorities, the working class, may turn to gangs as a way of achieving status, power and money. This is often through criminal activities as they have few opportunities in mainstream society; • Cohen – status frustration – he links not doing well at school with a lack of status that then reduces opportunities to be successful in a non-criminal way in society meaning turning to crime becomes likely; • gender – girls are more socially controlled by parents than boys, which then limits their opportunity to commit crime, the opposite is true for males; • ethnic minorities may believe they have a lack of opportunities in society to succeed legitimately due to prejudice and discrimination, which may cause them to turn to crime as they feel marginalised; • any other reasonable response. 8 Candidates should show an understanding of a range of reasons why a lack of opportunity may lead to crime. A lack of opportunity can be interpreted in several different ways by the candidate, e.g. education/workplace/family background/gender. The question is meant to be an open one and so all valid answers that relate to a lack of opportunity should be credited. Question Answer Marks Guidance 3(d) Band 0 [0 marks] No creditworthy response. Band 1 [1–3 marks] Answers in this band will show only a limited awareness of the question. A tendency to description is likely. Responses may be short and undeveloped and points stated without explanation. Sociological terms and concepts are unlikely to be used. At the bottom of the band (1 mark), expect one weak point. Higher in the band (2–3 marks), candidates may offer more than one weak point. Band 2 [4–6 marks] Answers in this band will show basic sociological knowledge and understanding. Responses may be underdeveloped and lacking in range. At the bottom of the band, candidates are unlikely to use sociological terms and concepts accurately. Higher in the band, candidates may be beginning to use sociological terms and concepts with greater accuracy. However, some aspects of the answer may only be partially developed/explained. Band 3 [7–8 marks] Answers in this band will show good sociological knowledge and understanding and will be well-developed and explained. Sociological terms and concepts will be used accurately overall. Answers will be well- focused on the question and there will be a range of points presented. At the top of the band explanations will be clear throughout. Question Answer Marks Guidance 3(e) To what extent can inadequate socialisation explain criminal behaviour? Arguments for: • feral children – demonstrate that without adequate socialisation children cannot fit into society and therefore can often turn to crime; • research shows that victims of abuse go on to be abusers themselves – inadequate socialisation here has led to crime; • in families and communities where crime is seen to be normal, role models are often criminals themselves – without proper socialisation others in the family or community are likely to become criminals themselves; • gangs – gangs socialise their members into an alternative set of norms and values to mainstream society – this inadequate socialisation often leads to criminal behaviour; • functionalists believe that through proper socialisation people develop a collective conscience which integrates them into society and prevents them from committing crime – without this socialisation crime may occur; • Hirschi – bonds of attachment – this theory says that if someone has strong feelings of belonging created through the socialisation process then they are unlikely to commit crime; • Cloward and Ohlin – illegitimate opportunity structure – these career opportunities exist in many lower-class communities and teach youngsters that they can be successful through being criminal – they are inadequately socialised to conform to the law; • the New Right (Murray) see the underclass and single parent families as inadequately socialising their children, e.g. no male role model for boys, feckless behaviour and the desire for instant gratification – this can all lead to crime; • any other reasonable response. 15 Candidates should consider the ways in which inadequate socialisation can explain criminal behaviour. They may link this with functionalist theory. In evaluation other alternative explanations for crime are likely to be discussed. Note: please be aware that some candidates may use the peer group as a point on the ‘for’ side of the argument. As long as this is linked to the idea of inadequate socialisation then this is fine to credit. Question Answer Marks Guidance 3(e) Arguments against: • functionalist and New Right arguments may be seen as too deterministic; • not all lower-class individuals who have been poorly socialised turn to crime; • explanations focusing on inadequate socialisation in the lower classes forget the amount of middle class and upper-class crime that is committed, e.g. white-collar crime; • many crimes are motivated by financial gain, e.g. fraud, money laundering, theft – these have nothing to do with the socialisation process of the criminal; • many sociologists believe that social characteristics such as age, ethnicity and gender may be far more relevant factors in explaining crime than a focus on socialisation; • crime is not only caused by cultural factors such as socialisation – structural factors, e.g. the inequalities inherent in capitalist societies, may be just as influential (Marxism); • crime may be caused by peer pressure and a desire to fit in rather than inadequate socialisation; • crime may be caused due to a lack of money or status, nothing to do with inadequate socialisation – ‘status frustration’ (Cohen); • crime may be caused by a desire to have excitement and fun, e.g. postmodern research on edgework (Katz, Lyng); • crime may be caused by the labelling process (Becker) when some people live up to the negative labels they have been given and self-fulfil to become criminals; • any other reasonable response. Question Answer Marks Guidance 3(e) Band 0 [0 marks] No creditworthy response. Band 1 [1–4 marks] Answers in this band may be vague and largely based on common sense showing limited knowledge of the debate. Use of sociological terms or concepts is very unlikely. Responses may be short, undeveloped and one-sided. Lower in the band (1–2 marks), expect one or two weak points. Higher in the band (3–4 marks) candidates may offer more than two points and provide a weak definition of key terms in the question. Band 2 [5–8 marks] In this band candidates will show some basic knowledge of the debate. Alternatively, they may offer an answer which is list-like in nature but there will be no real attempt to assess the issues raised by the question. There may be limited/some use of sociological terms or concepts. Responses may be underdeveloped and lack range. Answers may be simplistic and two-sided or only cover one side of the debate. Lower in the band, the response may be rather narrow in the points covered and there may be some development. Higher in the band, more points are likely to be covered with some development. Alternatively, a list-like answer with some development covering both sides of the argument may score up to 8 marks. A one-sided answer cannot score higher than 8 marks. Band 3 [9–12 marks] Answers in this band will show good sociological knowledge and understanding of the debate. Sociological terms and concepts will be used with greater accuracy and/or frequency. For the most part, answers will be well-developed, focused on the question and there will be a range of points presented. There will be a two-sided response, but it may lack range on one side. At the bottom of the band, candidates may provide a narrower range of developed points. At the top of the band, expect a wider range of developed points and clear focus on the question. Question Answer Marks Guidance 3(e) Band 4 [13–15 marks] Answers in this band will show excellent knowledge and understanding of the debate. There will be a strong grasp of the arguments as well as accurate and frequent use of sociological terms and concepts. Answers will be well-developed, clearly focused on the question and discuss a wide range of points. Responses will be two-sided and have a range of points on each side. At the bottom of the band (13 marks), the answer may lack a specific conclusion. Higher in the band, there will be a clear attempt to offer an assessment of the ‘To what extent.’ part of the question through a focused conclusion.
2 There are many different types of schools students can attend today, such as private and state schools. Experiences of education and educational achievement vary greatly because of this. Sociologists also debate other reasons for the differing achievements of students at school and believe factors such as money, levels of social control and gender may be important. (a) What is meant by the term ‘state schools’? [2] (b) Describe two school factors, apart from the type of school, that may affect a student’s educational achievement. [4] (c) Explain how social control can be experienced in education. [6] (d) Explain why some boys underachieve in education compared to girls. [8] (e) To what extent is there meritocracy in education? [15] Section C: Crime, deviance and social control
35 marks
Mark scheme: 2(a) What is meant by the term ‘state schools’? One mark for partial definition, e.g. a comprehensive school. Two marks for clear definition, e.g. schools that are run directly or indirectly by the government. this question. 2(b) Describe two school factors, apart from the type of school, that may affect a student’s educational achievement. Possible answers: • good schools have better examination results than bad schools (Rutter), e.g. high expectations of pupils, quality teaching, system of rewards, teacher role models; • teacher expectations – teachers may assume that working class students are less intelligent than higher class students and so they are more likely to be placed in the lower sets which may result in a self-fulfilling prophecy; • teacher expectations – higher class students may be seen as more intelligent by teachers thus are more likely to be in the higher sets and experience the halo effect; • the peer group a student mixes with inside school is likely to affect achievement, e.g. whether the student joins a pro or an anti-school subculture; • Marxists believe the hidden curriculum in schools encourages working class underachievement and vocational rather than academic aspirations; • Becker states that teachers label students – they have a picture in their heads of the ‘ideal student’ and those that match this stereotype are more likely to achieve well in school; • Rosenthal and Jacobson – when teachers believe students are bright, they challenge and push them more and so the students achieve higher results; 4 Candidates will describe two school factors that may affect a student’s educational achievement – any that describe home, cultural or linguistic factors should not be credited. Type of school attended should also not be credited. Question Answer Marks Guidance 2(b) • setting and streaming students is seen to limit what they are able to achieve academically; • there may be gendered expectations in school transmitted through the hidden curriculum that may result in gendered subject choice and achievement; • there may be an ethnocentric curriculum in place that alienates certain students and so negatively affects their educational achievement; • other reasonable response. One mark for each point correctly identified (up to a maximum of two). One mark for each point that is developed (up to a maximum of two). 2(c) Explain how social control can be experienced in education. Possible answers: • formal social control – if a student breaks a recognised rule then they can expect to be punished through a series of written sanctions by a teacher; • social control may be physical, such as corporal punishment; • social control may be to do with time, e.g. detentions, isolations and exclusions; • social control can be informal – teachers looks, words and instructions will often ensure the student conforms; • social control can also be exercised in schools through the peer group – peer group pressure, for example. This may result in the formation of pro or anti-school subcultures; • bullying from peers may control students through pressure and coercion; • social control may be through negative sanctions – these act to punish students for their actions and deter them from doing them again; 6 Candidates should consider how social control can be experienced in education/schools. Candidates may refer to informal or formal social control or a combination of the two. Question Answer Marks Guidance 2(c) • social control may be positive through a system of rewards and praise to encourage conformity; • social control can be experienced in different ways according to the gender/ethnicity/class of the student, e.g. boys are more likely to be excluded from school than girls; • any other reasonable response. Band 0 [0 marks] No creditworthy response. Band 1 [1–3 marks] Answers in this band will show only a limited awareness of the question. Responses may be short and un/underdeveloped. At the bottom of the band (1 mark), expect one weak point. Higher in the band (2–3 marks), candidates may offer more than one weak point, but there may be a tendency towards simplistic answers, engaging with sociological ideas without using sociological language. Band 2 [4–6 marks] Answers in this band will have clear and accurate explanation, showing good sociological knowledge and understanding. Sociological terms and concepts should be expected and explained. At the bottom of the band, the range of points covered may be narrow or lack detail. Higher in the band, answers will cover more than one point in a well-developed way or cover several points in less detail. Question Answer Marks Guidance 2(d) Explain why some boys underachieve in education compared to girls. Possible answers: • most school work is based on reading and writing whereas boys typically prefer work that is practical and active. Education is therefore thought to be a feminine institution; • with the decline of the primary sector and the feminisation of many secondary sector jobs, some boys may feel that there is little point in trying hard in school when there are no jobs available for them in society; • laddish behaviour – boys may belong to anti-school or anti-learning subcultures in which they think they will lose status in front of their peers if they are seen to be working hard in school (Willis); • social control – girls are still more likely to be heavily socially controlled outside school than boys. Boys are more likely to have later curfews and be outside playing with their friends whereas girls are often found in their bedrooms (McRobbie’s bedroom subculture) which is more conducive to study; • boys are said to be overly confident and so over estimate their own intelligence and abilities, they believe they can do well without trying hard. Girls are typically more likely to underestimate their ability and so work harder to try and be successful; • teachers may treat boys and girls differently in schools, poor behaviour may be more tolerated in boys as teachers think this is ‘normal’ whereas it will be sanctioned if a girl does it. This means boys spend more time not involved in their learning than girls do; • some ethnic minority boys may feel a double pressure – because of both their maleness and their ethnicity. Afro-Caribbean boys, for example, are often involved in hyper-masculine behaviour which goes against all school values and often results in sanctions; • working class students may already suffer from a lack of status in society and so use school as a way of trying to improve their status – through being the class clown or being cheeky to the teacher – Cohen status frustration theory; 8 Candidates need to explain different reasons why some boys underachieve in education compared to girls. Question Answer Marks Guidance 2(d) • girls are still thought by many to be socialised to be more passive than boys, this will then translate to them being more conformist in school and so more likely to do well; • media role models for males often emphasise violence, hyper masculinity and anti-education values which can lead to male under-achievement as compared to girls; • any other reasonable response. Band 0 [0 marks] No creditworthy response. Band 1 [1–3 marks] Answers in this band will show only a limited awareness of the question. A tendency to description is likely. Responses may be short and undeveloped and points stated without explanation. Sociological terms and concepts are unlikely to be used. At the bottom of the band (1 mark), expect one weak point. Higher in the band (2–3 marks), candidates may offer more than one weak point. Band 2 [4–6 marks] Answers in this band will show basic sociological knowledge and understanding. Responses may be underdeveloped and lacking in range. At the bottom of the band, candidates are unlikely to use sociological terms and concepts accurately. Higher in the band, candidates may be beginning to use sociological terms and concepts with greater accuracy. However, some aspects of the answer may only be partially developed/explained. Band 3 [7–8 marks] Answers in this band will show good sociological knowledge and understanding and will be well-developed and explained. Sociological terms and concepts will be used accurately overall. Answers will be well-focused on the question and there will be a range of points presented. At the top of the band explanations will be clear throughout. Question Answer Marks Guidance 2(e) To what extent is there meritocracy in education? Arguments for: • in most modern industrial societies education is free, giving everyone an equal chance of educational success; • functionalists believe that education is characterised by meritocratic principles whereby those who put the effort in will be rewarded; • educational success is measured by sitting examinations which reward those who have worked and tried hard; • standardised curriculum – e.g. national curriculum – this ensures that all students are taught the same core subjects and content thus making it meritocratic; • success in education mirrors societal values of having a strong work ethic and ensures that it is those most deserving of success, regardless of class, gender or ethnicity, who achieve it; • educational success can improve the life chances of those from poorer backgrounds allowing them upward social mobility as long as they demonstrate a good work ethic; • most educational establishments operate some system of setting and streaming which means that those who work the hardest to achieve their best will be rewarded with challenging lessons and high teacher expectations; • at the opposite end of the spectrum, those who do not take education seriously and do not work hard will find themselves in the bottom sets, sometimes unable to sit a full range of qualifications – this is only fair; • even for private schools that charge fees, bursaries and scholarships are available to those poorer students who have worked hard to achieve well to ensure that they can also access the best education, regardless of family income; • any other reasonable response. 15 Candidates are likely to engage with the functionalist theory of education in their ‘For’ arguments. This view can then be criticized in the ‘Against’ section and/or other theoretical explanations can be considered, e.g. Marxist views of meritocracy. Question Answer Marks Guidance 2(e) Arguments against: • the best qualifications are typically gained in private schools, as these are fee paying this cannot be meritocratic; • not all schools receive the same levels of funding, resources or support which means that schools aren’t operating on an equal playing field – they’re not meritocratic; • material deprivation may compromise the notion of meritocracy as not all students can afford private tutors, additional learning resources, internet access, etc.; • feminists argue that in some cultures a boy’s education is prioritised over a girl’s, meaning that boys have greater chances of educational success; • due to teacher stereotypes and expectations some groups of students may be thought to be less capable than others which may result in them being placed in lower sets where they are unable to achieve highly; • an ethnocentric curriculum may mean that ethnic minority students feel alienated from the education system and so don’t have the same chances to be successful; • teachers label some students as bright and others as unintelligent, this can result in a self-fulfilling prophecy or a halo effect – either result is not meritocratic; • education is seen to be a middle class institution based on middle class values and norms – those who possess the most cultural capital are typically the most successful. This is nothing to do with how hard a person works; • schools use an elaborated code in their teaching and assessment which is thought to favour the higher classes who also use this code at home, unlike the lower classes who use a restricted code; • Marxists believe that education is not meritocratic as it benefits the ruling class more than the working class through factors such as private education, the hidden curriculum and unequal economic capital; Question Answer Marks Guidance 2(e) • gender – an examination based system of assessment is thought to favour boys over girls whereas a coursework based system seems to favour girls – this is not meritocratic; • any other reasonable response. Band 0 [0 marks] No creditworthy response. Band 1 [1–4 marks] Answers in this band may be vague and largely based on common sense showing limited knowledge of the debate. Use of sociological terms or concepts is very unlikely. Responses may be short, undeveloped and one-sided. Lower in the band (1–2 marks), expect one or two weak points. Higher in the band (3–4 marks) candidates may offer more than two points and provide a weak definition of key terms in the question. Band 2 [5–8 marks] In this band candidates will show some basic knowledge of the debate. Alternatively, they may offer an answer which is list-like in nature but there will be no real attempt to assess the issues raised by the question. There may be limited/some use of sociological terms or concepts. Responses may be underdeveloped and lack range. Answers may be simplistic and two-sided or only cover one side of the debate. Lower in the band, the response may be rather narrow in the points covered and there may be some development. Higher in the band, more points are likely to be covered with some development. Alternatively, a list-like answer with some development covering both sides of the argument may score up to 8 marks. A one-sided answer cannot score higher than 8 marks. Question Answer Marks Guidance 2(e) Band 3 [9–12 marks] Answers in this band will show good sociological knowledge and understanding of the debate. Sociological terms and concepts will be used with greater accuracy and/or frequency. For the most part, answers will be well-developed, focused on the questions and there will be a range of points presented. There will be a two-sided response, but it may lack range on one side. At the bottom of the band, candidates may provide a narrower range of developed points. At the top of the band, expect a wider range of developed points and clear focus on the question. Band 4 [13–15 marks] Answers in this band will show excellent knowledge and understanding of the debate. There will be a strong grasp of the arguments as well as accurate and frequent use of sociological terms and concepts. Answers will be well-developed, clearly focused on the question and discuss a wide range of points. Responses will be two-sided and have a range of points on each side. At the bottom of the band (13 marks), the answer may lack a specific conclusion. Higher in the band, there will be a clear attempt to offer an assessment of the ‘To what extent?’ part of the question through a focused conclusion.
3 Who commits crime and why do they do it? This is a question often debated in sociology with different explanations being offered. Factors such as age and ethnicity are considered to be important as are the levels of social control, policing and surveillance in society. Many believe that punishment is essential if governments are to reduce crime. (a) What is meant by the term ‘surveillance’? [2] (b) Describe two sociological explanations for crime. [4] (c) Explain how punishment can reduce crime. [6] (d) Explain why some crimes are not reported to the police. [8] (e) To what extent is age the most influential factor in determining whether an individual commits crime? [15] Section D: Media
35 marks
Mark scheme: 3(a) What is meant by the term ‘surveillance’? One mark for partial definition, e.g. watching people. Two marks for clear definition, e.g. monitoring individuals and groups by governments or other agents such as the police, collecting information with the intention of preventing crime. 3(b) Describe two sociological explanations for crime. Possible answers: • inadequate socialisation – not being taught the correct norms and values of society; • labelling theory – being stereotyped to be criminal and living up to this label (self-fulfilling prophecy); • Marxism – crime is resistance to the upper class exploitation of the working class in society; • material/relative deprivation – not having enough money to buy desired material goods leads to crime; • status frustration – Cohen – a lack of status in society may lead some people to turn to crime; • a search for thrills – postmodernism and edgework (Katz, Lyng); • peer pressure – particularly with young people; juvenile delinquency, gangs etc.; • being in a time of transition characterised by a lack of responsibility, e.g. functionalism and drift theory (Matza); • hegemonic masculinity – pressure on men to be the breadwinner and to prove their masculinity may lead to crime; • any other reasonable response. One mark for each point correctly identified (up to a maximum of two). One mark for each point that is developed (up to a maximum of two). 4 Candidates will describe two different sociological explanations for crime. Question Answer Marks Guidance 3(c) Explain how punishment can reduce crime. Possible answers: • financial punishments – the fear of being penalised financially deters people from committing crimes; • incapacitation – punishments that do this prevent crimes from being committed and reduce re-offending rates; • methods of punishment that rehabilitate criminals, e.g. anger management, education and training can all reduce crime; • public humiliation – this can reduce crime through the embarrassment factor that people do not want to experience, either for themselves or for their families causing them not to commit crime; • punishments leading to criminal records can reduce crime as people are aware of the impact this is likely to have on their ability to gain employment; • restorative punishment – having to ‘face your victim’ can reduce crime as it demonstrates the consequences of criminal behaviour and breeds empathy for the victim; • conditional sentencing, e.g. tagging can reduce crime as it imposes restrictions on where people can go and what they can do, limiting the individual’s freedom and ability to commit crime; • capital punishment – the criminal is removed from society and therefore cannot commit crime – it can also act as a public deterrent; • exclusion – prisons take away freedom and thus stop individuals from seeing their families whilst also excluding and isolating them from society – the thought of this reduces/deters crime; • informal punishments, e.g. from family members, can reduce levels of crime as individuals do not want to let their families down and thus do not commit crime or stop committing it; • any other reasonable response. 6 Candidates should show an understanding of how punishment can reduce crime. Examples of punishments may also be discussed, but in order to be made relevant these need to be linked to the reduction of crime. Question Answer Marks Guidance 3(c) Band 0 [0 marks] No creditworthy response. Band 1 [1–3 marks] Answers in this band will show only a limited awareness of the question. Responses may be short and un/underdeveloped. At the bottom of the band (1 mark), expect one weak point. Higher in the band (2–3 marks), candidates may offer more than one weak point, but there may be a tendency towards simplistic answers, engaging with sociological ideas without using sociological language. Band 2 [4–6 marks] Answers in this band will have clear and accurate explanation, showing good sociological knowledge and understanding. Sociological terms and concepts should be expected and explained. At the bottom of the band, the range of points covered may be narrow or lack detail. Higher in the band, answers will cover more than one point in a well-developed way or cover several points in less detail. Question Answer Marks Guidance 3(d) Explain why some crimes are not reported to the police. Possible answers: • victimless crime – not every crime has a victim and therefore there is no motivation or need to report it to the police, e.g. drug taking; • if people are not aware that they are a victim of crime then they will not report it to the police, e.g. petty theft, child abuse; • certain communities have little trust in the police force and therefore will rarely report crimes to them; • in certain contexts, e.g. gangs, sub-cultures, prisons, crime is a normal part of life and therefore will not be reported to the police; • some crimes are very sensitive and personal, e.g. sexual crimes, abuse, and so victims may be reluctant to report these to the police – feminism; • Marxists talk about how invisible white-collar and corporate crime is as they believe the formal agents act to protect the higher classes from prosecution – companies often deal with these kind of crimes themselves and therefore they are not likely to be reported to the police; • if there is no motivation to report the crime, e.g. the victim does not think anything will be done about it because it is too petty, no insurance claim or there is too little evidence then it is likely to be reported to the police; • some new crimes such as cybercrimes are not reported to the police due to factors like embarrassment, not recognising the act as a crime etc.; • criminals as family members – crimes may not be reported when the criminal is part of a person’s family, they do not want to get them into trouble; • any other reasonable response. 8 Candidates should show an understanding of a range of reasons why some crimes are not reported to the police. Points about why the police do not always record crimes or why not all crimes are prosecuted cannot be credited. Question Answer Marks Guidance 3(d) Band 0 [0 marks] No creditworthy response. Band 1 [1–3 marks] Answers in this band will show only a limited awareness of the question. A tendency to description is likely. Responses may be short and undeveloped and points stated without explanation. Sociological terms and concepts are unlikely to be used. At the bottom of the band (1 mark), expect one weak point. Higher in the band (2–3 marks), candidates may offer more than one weak point. Band 2 [4–6 marks] Answers in this band will show basic sociological knowledge and understanding. Responses may be underdeveloped and lacking in range. At the bottom of the band, candidates are unlikely to use sociological terms and concepts accurately. Higher in the band, candidates may be beginning to use sociological terms and concepts with greater accuracy. However, some aspects of the answer may only be partially developed/explained. Band 3 [7–8 marks] Answers in this band will show good sociological knowledge and understanding and will be well-developed and explained. Sociological terms and concepts will be used accurately overall. Answers will be well-focused on the question and there will be a range of points presented. At the top of the band explanations will be clear throughout. Question Answer Marks Guidance 3(e) To what extent is age the most influential factor in determining whether an individual commits crime? Arguments for: • according to the official crime statistics youths commit a high proportion of crime – police therefore target them which may lead to youths living up to the negative label and committing more crime (self-fulfilling prophecy); • some offences committed by young people are ‘status crimes’ – only criminal because of their age; • Matza’s drift theory says that petty offending is just a normal part of growing up so it’s not surprising young people commit a lot of these crimes; • postmodernists talk about the thrill of committing crimes as being particularly appealing to the young – edgework, Katz and Lyng; • functionalism – they see adolescence as a period of transition in which young people ‘test the boundaries’ thus making criminal/deviant behaviour quite likely; • young people are more likely than adults to be part of criminal sub- cultures and gangs – in these contexts committing crime is expected and often necessary to prove your loyalty, e.g. initiation ceremonies; • young people are more subject to peer pressure than older people and so may commit more crime; • young people are typically more ‘media technology savvy’ and thus have the skills to commit cybercrimes that the older generations do not; • young people typically have fewer responsibilities than older age groups and in this sense have less to lose from committing crime; • if young people are not successful in school,l they may resist authority and turn to a delinquent lifestyle for their status instead – Cohen (status frustration); 15 The ‘Against’ arguments may consider flaws in the ‘age is important’ arguments and/or consider other social factors as being more influential, e.g. gender, ethnicity and social class. Question Answer Marks Guidance 3(e) • middle aged people may have opportunities to commit crime in their everyday work role, e.g. white-collar/corporate crimes; • functionalists believe that as older people disengage from society there will be less opportunities for them to commit crime; • the elderly do not fit Cicourel’s stereotype of the typical delinquent and so are unlikely to be targeted or suspected by the police meaning they are able to get away with crime; • any other reasonable response. Arguments against: • not every young person commits crime and not every elderly person is law abiding – age may be a relevant factor, but it does not determine criminality; • gender may be more important than age – males are under pressure to be masculine, to be the provider and to have high status – this may all lead to criminal behaviour; • ethnicity may be more important than age – resistance to racism may cause some ethnic minorities to commit crime as they feel marginalised from mainstream society; • social class may be more important than age – material deprivation and Merton’s strain theory may better explain why some people turn to crime; • age is more likely to intersect with other social factors rather than be a singular determining factor – for example, a high amount of crime is committed by young, working class males; • the social context needs to be considered – in Japan, for example, elderly crime is growing and the over 65 category now commit approximately 15% of all the country’s crimes due to Japan’s increasing economic problems; • the official crime statistics may hide the true amount of crime by age groups other than youths, e.g. Marxists believe most white-collar criminals do not get prosecuted – typically older adults; • any other reasonable response. Question Answer Marks Guidance 3(e) Band 0 [0 marks] No creditworthy response. Band 1 [1–4 marks] Answers in this band may be vague and largely based on common sense showing limited knowledge of the debate. Use of sociological terms or concepts is very unlikely. Responses may be short, undeveloped and one-sided. Lower in the band (1–2 marks), expect one or two weak points. Higher in the band (3–4 marks) candidates may offer more than two points and provide a weak definition of key terms in the question. Band 2 [5–8 marks] In this band candidates will show some basic knowledge of the debate. Alternatively, they may offer an answer which is list-like in nature but there will be no real attempt to assess the issues raised by the question. There may be limited/some use of sociological terms or concepts. Responses may be underdeveloped and lack range. Answers may be simplistic and two-sided or only cover one side of the debate. Lower in the band, the response may be rather narrow in the points covered and there may be some development. Higher in the band, more points are likely to be covered with some development. Alternatively, a list-like answer with some development covering both sides of the argument may score up to 8 marks. A one-sided answer cannot score higher than 8 marks. Band 3 [9–12 marks] Answers in this band will show good sociological knowledge and understanding of the debate. Sociological terms and concepts will be used with greater accuracy and/or frequency. For the most part, answers will be well-developed, focused on the questions and there will be a range of points presented. There will be a two-sided response, but it may lack range on one side. At the bottom of the band, candidates may provide a narrower range of developed points. At the top of the band, expect a wider range of developed points and clear focus on the question. Question Answer Marks Guidance 3(e) Band 4 [13–15 marks] Answers in this band will show excellent knowledge and understanding of the debate. There will be a strong grasp of the arguments as well as accurate and frequent use of sociological terms and concepts. Answers will be well-developed, clearly focused on the question and discuss a wide range of points. Responses will be two-sided and have a range of points on each side. At the bottom of the band (13 marks), the answer may lack a specific conclusion. Higher in the band, there will be a clear attempt to offer an assessment of the ‘To what extent?’ part of the question through a focused conclusion.
4 The media today can be split into two types, traditional and new media. Both can have positive and negative effects on the audience. Content and censorship are often different depending on which type of media is being discussed and who the media gatekeeper is. Despite this, stereotypical representations of some social groups exist in all types of media. (a) What is meant by the term ‘new media’? [2] (b) Describe two stereotypical representations of men in the media today. [4] (c) Explain how postmodernists view new media. [6] (d) Explain why the media can have a negative effect on children. [8] (e) To what extent do media gatekeepers control the content of the media? [15]
35 marks
Mark scheme: 4(a) What is meant by the term ‘new media’? One mark for partial definition, e.g. the internet. Two marks for clear definition, e.g. digital technologies/platforms involving greater interactivity. 2 4(b) Describe two stereotypical representations of men in the media today. Possible answers: • the provider – men are shown to be the breadwinner; • the protector/hero – men are shown to protect women and children; • physical strength – men are shown to be the stronger sex; • the criminal – men are shown in this law breaking role; • the hegemonic male – an extreme form of what traditional men are meant to be like; • new stereotypes of the ‘new man’ – mixing fatherhood with paid employment; • new stereotype of the metrosexual man, e.g. fashion, style, city based; 4 Question Answer Marks Guidance 4(b) • the homosexual man – effeminate, fashion conscious etc.; • any other reasonable response. One mark for each point correctly identified (up to a maximum of two). One mark for each point that is developed (up to a maximum of two). 4(c) Explain how postmodernists view new media. Possible answers: • they believe that new media is more interactive than ever before – a two-way process; • new media is harder for Governments/corporations to control than ever before meaning there are fewer possibilities for a dominant ideology to be conveyed; • new media is global – in terms of ownership, content and audience; • postmodernists believe that diversification is made more significant with new media as companies expand into several different areas of the media industry rather than specialising in just one; • convergence – postmodernists believe this has gained significance with new media as technologies become multi-functional, e.g. someone can email, text, access social media, watch videos, all from a mobile phone; • social media has grown hugely in popularity and significance, being a core influence upon social identity, particularly for young people; • new media is characterised by diversity meaning the old ways of doing things have disappeared offering the audience more choice in what they consume and the devices that they choose to use for this; • postmodernists believe new media sees the audience as being at the very core of it – as prosumers and citizen journalists, producing new media content; 6 Candidates need to show an understanding of different ways that postmodernists view new media. Examples from an international, national or local context may be included, these should be credited accordingly if used correctly. Question Answer Marks Guidance 4(c) • postmodernists believe new media allows for more specialist and niche programming to be made and consumed, not just mass appeal material; • postmodernists see new media as internet based and thus it operates on multiple platforms, unlike traditional media; • other reasonable response. Band 0 [0 marks] No creditworthy response. Band 1 [1–3 marks] Answers in this band will show only a limited awareness of the question. Responses may be short and un/underdeveloped. At the bottom of the band (1 mark), expect one weak point. Higher in the band (2–3 marks), candidates may offer more than one weak point, but there may be a tendency towards simplistic answers, engaging with sociological ideas without using sociological language. Band 2 [4–6 marks] Answers in this band will have clear and accurate explanation, showing good sociological knowledge and understanding. Sociological terms and concepts should be expected and explained. At the bottom of the band, the range of points covered may be narrow or lack detail. Higher in the band, answers will cover more than one point in a well-developed way or cover several points in less detail. Question Answer Marks Guidance 4(d) Explain why the media can have a negative effect on children. Possible answers: • copycat negative behaviour – children may copy what they see/hear in the media, e.g. violence, swearing; • desensitised to violence in real life – this means they no longer feel shocked or negatively about real life violence; • hypodermic needle model – the media has an immediate and direct effect on the audience meaning children are very vulnerable to any negative effects (Bandura); • body image – the media sets the agenda for what is considered as normal, it has been heavily criticised for leading to health problems such as anorexia, e.g. the size zero debate; • new media is very difficult to control meaning that traditional protectors for children such as the TV watershed and age certificates no longer control what children can and cannot consume; • internet streaming means that media content is available on many different platforms so that parents do not know what children are engaging with. Many are watching adult content that is thought to be unsuitable for children; • the rise of social media sites and the increase in ownership of devices such as smartphones and laptops means that children often access unsuitable media content for hours on their own every day; • new media has been accused of making child grooming and exploitation far easier through the use of the internet; • Neil Postman – ‘loss of innocence and the disappearance of childhood‘ – the media is highly sexualised and allows children access to adult materials and lifestyles that can have negative effects on children; • advertising is everywhere and this can be seen to be negative for children as it leads them to believe that consumer items are necessary to be happy; • the rise of new media and social networking could lead to cyberbullying and peer pressure; 8 Candidates may consider the varying ways that the media can be said to have a negative effect on children. This can be through content or usage. These may be linked with relevant theories and perspectives, but this is not a necessity. Question Answer Marks Guidance 4(d) • video game culture – some children may spend so much of their time playing video games that they become uninterested in schoolwork and/or socially isolated; • any other reasonable response. Band 0 [0 marks] No creditworthy response. Band 1 [1–3 marks] Answers in this band will show only a limited awareness of the question. A tendency to description is likely. Responses may be short and undeveloped and points stated without explanation. Sociological terms and concepts are unlikely to be used. At the bottom of the band (1 mark), expect one weak point. Higher in the band (2–3 marks), candidates may offer more than one weak point. Band 2 [4–6 marks] Answers in this band will show basic sociological knowledge and understanding. Responses may be underdeveloped and lacking in range. At the bottom of the band, candidates are unlikely to use sociological terms and concepts accurately. Higher in the band, candidates may be beginning to use sociological terms and concepts with greater accuracy. However, some aspects of the answer may only be partially developed/explained. Band 3 [7–8 marks] Answers in this band will show good sociological knowledge and understanding and will be well-developed and explained. Sociological terms and concepts will be used accurately overall. Answers will be well-focused on the question and there will be a range of points presented. At the top of the band explanations will be clear throughout. Question Answer Marks Guidance 4(e) To what extent do media gatekeepers control the content of the media? Arguments for: • editors select which stories make the media and which do not; • owners determine the accepted ideologies and stance of the media company/product, e.g. politically; • huge media conglomerates like Disney control today’s media content in a search for profits through entertainment and merchandise; • journalists decide upon the slant and biases that a story in the media will take; • gatekeepers are influenced by expected news values/the idea of newsworthiness which will determine which stories make the news and which do not; • gatekeepers determine agenda setting as they decide which stories will be talked about and which will be sidelined; • the government act as gatekeepers through legal acts such as the official secrets act, so determining what is allowed to be broadcast and what is not; • censors act as gatekeepers as they allow some things into the media and ban other things; • new media – e.g. Twitter and Facebook – content is monitored constantly and things that infringe guidelines are removed; • any other reasonable response. Arguments against: • the internet and new media is less regulated meaning that media gatekeepers can no longer control the content of the media; • advertising companies rather than media gatekeepers control the content of the media as the media today is a commercial enterprise that must appeal to the demands of advertising in order to be successful; 15 Candidates should discuss how media gatekeepers can control the content of the media. They could also, in evaluation, consider how possible this really is in the new media world as well as looking at other possible sources of control over media content other than the gatekeepers. Gatekeeper – the ability of individuals to control access to and content of the media for the audience. Question Answer Marks Guidance 4(e) • the audience create their own media today through citizen journalism and uploading content to sites such as YouTube; • audience interactivity means that the power of media gatekeepers is no longer very influential as an active discussion can take place on what has been presented which is audience driven; • social media is largely unregulated and content is largely audience driven, meaning that media gatekeepers do not control the content; • immediacy of the media today means that media gatekeepers are unlikely to be able to control media content as it is ‘out there’ and spread virally so quickly; • vloggers/Youtubers operating within new media control media content today, not the media gatekeepers – they are so influential in determining what young people are talking and thinking about; • any other reasonable response. Band 0 [0 marks] No creditworthy response. Band 1 [1–4 marks] Answers in this band may be vague and largely based on common sense showing limited knowledge of the debate. Use of sociological terms or concepts is very unlikely. Responses may be short, undeveloped and one-sided. Lower in the band (1–2 marks), expect one or two weak points. Higher in the band (3–4 marks) candidates may offer more than two points and provide a weak definition of key terms in the question. Band 2 [5–8 marks] In this band candidates will show some basic knowledge of the debate. Alternatively, they may offer an answer which is list-like in nature but there will be no real attempt to assess the issues raised by the question. There may be limited/some use of sociological terms or concepts. Question Answer Marks Guidance 4(e) Responses may be underdeveloped and lack range. Answers may be simplistic and two-sided or only cover one side of the debate. Lower in the band, the response may be rather narrow in the points covered and there may be some development. Higher in the band, more points are likely to be covered with some development. Alternatively, a list-like answer with some development covering both sides of the argument may score up to 8 marks. A one-sided answer cannot score higher than 8 marks. Band 3 [9–12 marks] Answers in this band will show good sociological knowledge and understanding of the debate. Sociological terms and concepts will be used with greater accuracy and/or frequency. For the most part, answers will be well-developed, focused on the questions and there will be a range of points presented. There will be a two-sided response, but it may lack range on one side. At the bottom of the band, candidates may provide a narrower range of developed points. At the top of the band, expect a wider range of developed points and clear focus on the question. Band 4 [13–15 marks] Answers in this band will show excellent knowledge and understanding of the debate. There will be a strong grasp of the arguments as well as accurate and frequent use of sociological terms and concepts. Answers will be well-developed, clearly focused on the question and discuss a wide range of points. Responses will be two-sided and have a range of points on each side. At the bottom of the band (13 marks), the answer may lack a specific conclusion. Higher in the band, there will be a clear attempt to offer an assessment of the ‘To what extent?’ part of the question through a focused conclusion.
3 Agencies of social control all try to create conformity in society. Despite this, crime and deviance still occur in many forms such as burglary, murder and corporate crime. Crime rates are produced by the police, courts and government to understand trends in offending and to help find solutions to crime. However, many sociologists believe that the official measurements of crime are not very accurate. (a) What is meant by the term ‘conformity’? [2] (b) Describe two examples of corporate crime. [4] (c) Explain how informal agencies of social control can prevent crime. [6] (d) Explain why official measurements of crime may not always be accurate. [8] (e) To what extent is gender the most important factor in determining whether an individual commits crime? [15] Section D: Media
35 marks
Mark scheme: 3(a) What is meant by the term ‘conformity’? 2 One mark for partial definition, e.g. fitting in. Two marks for clear definition, e.g. attitudes and behaviour fit in with those of the dominant social group. 3(b) Describe two examples of corporate crime. 4 Candidates will be expected to describe two examples of corporate crime. Possible answers: • false claims – companies may falsely claim on insurance policies in order to accrue money; • tax evasion – not paying correct taxes on profits made, e.g. General Electric, Starbucks; • violations of environmental laws – e.g. a company disposes of its waste illegally/pollution; • business/financial fraud – embezzlement of money in order to increase the company’s profits, e.g. Enron; • bribery – of public officials in order to benefit the company, e.g. to get planning permission; • insider trading – manipulation of the financial stock market in order to make the company money; • corporate manslaughter – e.g. when workers die due to the company’s failure to follow health and safety legislation, e.g. Far West Water; • selling a deadly/dangerous product, e.g. thalidomide drug/Peanut corporation of America; • other reasonable response. One mark for each point correctly identified (up to maximum of two). One mark for each point that is developed (up to a maximum of two). 3(c) Explain how informal agencies of social control can prevent crime. 6 Candidates should discuss the ways informal agencies of social control, e.g. schools, families, media, workplace, religion and peers can prevent crime. Possible answers: • informal sanctions – such as ridicule, comments and disapproving looks – persuade people not to commit crime as they internalise that these reactions are negative ones; • Informal agencies typically have close relationships with individuals therefore have more influence over them in persuading them not to commit crime; • religion – has rules regarding behaviour for their followers which typically ensures criminal behaviour is avoided, e.g. the 10 commandments in Christianity forbid certain actions; • media – reporting criminal behaviour and creating folk devils makes people realise criminal actions will be punished and stigmatised; • family – act as role models for their offspring and so will ensure sanctions are put in place to prevent rule breaking behaviour, e.g. grounding; • education – the hidden curriculum transmits a set of values that encourages conformity and non-criminal behaviour; • peer group – positive peer pressure and the values of one’s sub-culture can ensure that members do not commit criminal acts; • workplace – will often use severe sanctions such as sackings, demotions, etc. if criminal behaviour occurs – this deters individuals; • other reasonable response. Band 0 [0 marks] No creditworthy response. Band 1 [1–3 marks] Answers in this band will show only a limited awareness of the question. Responses may be short and un/underdeveloped. At the bottom of the band (1 mark), expect one weak point. Higher in the band (2–3 marks), candidates may offer more than one weak point, but there may be a tendency towards simplistic answers, engaging with sociological ideas without using sociological language. Band 2 [4–6 marks] Answers in this band will have clear and accurate explanation, showing good sociological knowledge and understanding. Sociological terms and concepts should be expected and explained. At the bottom of the band, the range of points covered may be narrow or lack detail. Higher in the band, answers will cover more than one point in a well-developed way or cover several points in less detail. 3(d) Explain why official measurements of crime may not always be 8 accurate. Candidates should discuss issues with the official measurements of crime, e.g. the OCS. This is likely to consider problems of both reporting and recording but this is not essential. Possible answers: • most crimes that make it to the statistics are reported to the police either by victim or witness – if a crime is not reported then it will not make the statistics (dark figure of crime); • trivial crimes – often not reported to the police as people do not believe the police can do anything; • benefit to victims – crimes involving insured items are much more likely to be reported to the police as the insurance company requires a crime number; • reprisal – victims and witnesses may not report a crime to the police if they fear they will be threatened with reprisal, e.g. gangs; • embarrassment – victims may not report crimes to the police because they are embarrassed about what has happened • e.g. sexual crimes – these are notoriously under-reported; • invisible crimes – many white-collar and corporate crimes are unlikely to come to the attention of the police as they are either unknown about or dealt with internally by the company involved; • police discretion – not all crimes reported to the police are recorded in the statistics; • cuffing – police are under pressure to achieve targets and so may manipulate statistics to create a good impression of the job they do, e.g. by downgrading a crime’s seriousness or filing it as a false report; • other reasonable response. Band 0 [0 marks] No creditworthy response. Band 1 [1–3 marks] Answers in this band will show only a limited awareness of the question. A tendency to description is likely. Responses may be short and undeveloped and points stated without explanation. Sociological terms and concepts are unlikely to be used. At the bottom of the band (1 mark), expect one weak point. Higher in the band (2–3 marks), candidates may offer more than one weak point. Band 2 [4–6 marks] Answers in this band will show basic sociological knowledge and understanding. Responses may be underdeveloped and lacking in range. At the bottom of the band, candidates are unlikely to use sociological terms and concepts accurately. Higher in the band, candidates may be beginning to use sociological terms and concepts with greater accuracy. However, some aspects of the answer may only be partially developed/explained. 3(d) Band 3 [7–8 marks] Answers in this band will show good sociological knowledge and understanding and will be well-developed and explained. Sociological terms and concepts will be used accurately overall. Answers will be well-focused on the question and there will be a range of points presented. At the top of the band explanations will be clear throughout. 3(e) To what extent is gender the most important factor in determining 15 whether an individual commits crime? Candidates should consider how gender may determine whether an individual commits crime. This means they could look at either men or women or both genders. In evaluation they may argue that it is other social factors rather than gender that are most important, e.g. age, ethnicity and/or social class. Possible answers: FOR • masculinity – crime is a way of achieving masculinity for males and thus increasing their status; • risk taking behaviour – males are more likely to take risks and commit ‘edgework’ (postmodernism) than females which may account for their higher crime rate; • aggression – this is a way for males to assert their masculinity against other males or females (expressive crime/protector role); • breadwinner – traditional gender roles say that the man should provide for his family, if he cannot do this legitimately then he may turn to crime; • gangs – are dominated by males and gangs initiation ceremonies and lifestyle choices often involve criminal behaviour, e.g. drug dealing; • socialisation – girls and boys are socialised differently – girls to be passive, males to be active (Oakley) – this may result in higher levels of male criminality; • social control – girls are more socially controlled than boys and so may have less chance to commit crime, e.g. street culture versus bedroom subculture; • biology – testosterone and greater physical strength mean that males are more likely to commit criminal/deviant acts than females; • labelling and stereotyping – those in the CJS are likely to perceive males as being the most likely to commit crime and so target them – this can lead to a self-fulfilling prophecy (Becker, Cicourel); • other reasonable response. 3(e) AGAINST • self-report studies show that the number of female offences is under- estimated which implies that the idea that gender is a reason to explain criminality is wrong; • as society becomes more egalitarian so it seems that female criminality rises, e.g. girl gangs, ladettes, which implies that crime cannot be explained by gender; • police labelling – Cicourel says there is a picture of a ‘typical delinquent’ in the police and courts heads that criminals are male – this means males are more likely to be stopped and searched and arrested than females not that they are actually any more criminal (chivalry thesis – Pollak); • age – is said by many sociologists to be more important than gender in explaining criminality, e.g. most offenders are young; • ethnicity – is said by many sociologists to be a more important social factor than gender – ethnic minorities are disproportionately reflected in the criminal population, e.g. prison rates; • social class – many sociologists believe that it is a person’s class position that is the most influential in determining their criminality • e.g. the lower a person’s class, the higher their rates of offending; • type of crime – rates of shoplifting are similar for both males and females making it difficult to argue that gender is a reason to explain different offending rates; • Interpretivism – people commit crimes for different reasons and to generalise that this is because of their gender is misleading; • other reasonable response. Band 0 [0 marks] No creditworthy response. Band 1 [1–4 marks] Answers in this band may be vague and largely based on common sense showing limited knowledge of the debate. Use of sociological terms or concepts is very unlikely. Responses may be short, undeveloped and one- sided. Lower in the band (1–2 marks), expect one or two weak points. Higher in the band (3–4 marks) candidates may offer more than two points and provide a weak definition of key terms in the question. Band 2 [5–8 marks] In this band candidates will show some basic knowledge of the debate. Alternatively, they may offer an answer which is list-like in nature but there will be no real attempt to assess the issues raised by the question. There may be limited/some use of sociological terms or concepts. Responses may be underdeveloped and lack range. Answers may be simplistic and two- sided or only cover one side of the debate. Lower in the band, the response may be rather narrow in the points covered and there may be some development. Higher in the band, more points are likely to be covered with some development. Alternatively, a list-like answer with some development covering both sides of the argument may score up to 8 marks. A one-sided answer cannot score higher than 8 marks. 3(e) Band 3 [9–12 marks] Answers in this band will show good sociological knowledge and understanding of the debate. Sociological terms and concepts will be used with greater accuracy and/or frequency. For the most part, answers will be well-developed, focused on the questions and there will be a range of points presented. There will be a two-sided response but it may lack range on one side. At the bottom of the band, candidates may provide a narrower range of developed points. At the top of the band, expect a wider range of developed points and clear focus on the question. Band 4 [13–15 marks] Answers in this band will show excellent knowledge and understanding of the debate. There will be a strong grasp of the arguments as well as accurate and frequent use of sociological terms and concepts. Answers will be well-developed, clearly focused on the question and discuss a wide range of points. Responses will be two-sided and have a range of points on each side. At the bottom of the band (13 marks), the answer may lack a specific conclusion. Higher in the band, there will be a clear attempt to offer an assessment of the ‘To what extent.?’ part of the question through a focused conclusion.
4 Societies and cultures are changing rapidly and it is in the media that the biggest changes are occurring. New media is very different to traditional media. New media is believed to be interactive and free from control and bias. However, all media including the internet, broadcasting and the film industry provides the audience with information and entertainment. The media also socialises and educates individuals. (a) What is meant by the term ‘broadcasting’? [2] (b) Describe two ways young people are living in a media culture. [4] (c) Explain how new media is interactive. [6] (d) Explain why the media is an important agency of socialisation. [8] (e) To what extent is the media free from control and bias? [15]
35 marks
Mark scheme: 4(a) What is meant by the term ‘broadcasting’? 2 One mark for partial definition, e.g. TV and radio. Two marks for clear definition, e.g. transmitting radio or TV to large audiences. 4(b) Describe two ways young people are living in a media culture. 4 Candidates will be expected to describe two ways young people are living in a media culture. This may be demonstrated through examples. Possible answers: • time – young people spend more time interacting with and using the media than any other age group; • interactivity – new media immerses young people into a way of life where online communication and relationships become the norm; • social media – most young people take part in social media, sharing stories, photos, videos, etc., virtual communities are part of most young people’s lives; • digital natives – young people have been brought up to see new, digital media as the norm therefore it forms a part of their everyday norms and values; • postmodernism – these theorists claim that society is now so media saturated that a young person’s way of life is dominated by the media; • citizen journalism – the ability to film and share live news and events via the internet means that young people are continuously living in a media culture; 4(b) • cult of celebrity – celebrities, reality TV stars and sports people have become role models and ‘stars’ for young people who follow them on social media, subscribe to fan sites and engage with their websites, e.g. influencers; • postmodernism – hyper-reality = the media constructs for young people a world that they have no real life experience of, thus creating reality through a media culture; • advertising – the proliferation of advertising and marketing opportunities in all areas of life means that young people are now living in a media culture; • convergence – technology has developed to allow young people to access media across various different platforms from a wide variety of devices – a portable and instant media culture is formed; • pluralism – competition and choice = more media is available and targeted at young people than ever before; • other reasonable response. One mark for each point correctly identified (up to maximum of two). One mark for each point that is developed (up to a maximum of two). 4(c) Explain how new media is interactive. 6 Candidate’s should consider the ways that today’s media allow for interactivity. Possible answers: • personalised media usage – e.g. having news on particular topics emailed directly to you; • create own media – write a blog, create a website, upload videos and/or photos, tweet (Twitter), etc. (user generated content); • online discussion – contribute to this via forums, social media and message boards and reply immediately to others; • role play and gaming – immersing yourself into a fantasy world and role playing a particular part, often competing against users in other countries and communicating with them through the medium/game; • instant voting on live TV for something or someone, e.g. a talent show winner, a point of view, a multi-choice quiz question; • citizen journalism – the audience can now create media material through uploading live footage; • youtube channels/Instagram/tiktok, etc. – allow members of the audience to create their own media output and interact with viewers or comment on other creators channels/posts/videos; • social media influencers and vloggers regularly interact with their fans and let them ‘into their virtual lives’, e.g. Zoella; • other reasonable response. 4(c) Band 0 [0 marks] No creditworthy response. Band 1 [1–3 marks] Answers in this band will show only a limited awareness of the question. Responses may be short and un/underdeveloped. At the bottom of the band (1 mark), expect one weak point. Higher in the band (2–3 marks), candidates may offer more than one weak point, but there may be a tendency towards simplistic answers, engaging with sociological ideas without using sociological language. Band 2 [4–6 marks] Answers in this band will have clear and accurate explanation, showing good sociological knowledge and understanding. Sociological terms and concepts should be expected and explained. At the bottom of the band, the range of points covered may be narrow or lack detail. Higher in the band, answers will cover more than one point in a well-developed way or cover several points in less detail. 4(d) Explain why the media is an important agency of socialisation. 8 Candidates should discuss reasons why the media is an important agency of socialisation. They are likely to discuss processes such as imitation and/or specific examples and case studies. Possible answers: • Marxism – the media convey the dominant norms, values and ideology and so keep the population in a state of false consciousness; • postmodernism – the media saturated society and multiple platforms that now dominate the industry makes it easier than ever before for people to be influenced by the media; • feminism – believe messages and images in the media are patriarchal and that this becomes represented as normal – so teaching the audience to think of males and females in very different ways, e.g. stereotyping; • invisibility – by giving some social groups prominence in the media and invisibilising others, the media is highly influential in determining what the audience think of as ‘normal’/important; • male gaze – the media objectifies females for the pleasure of males – this legitimises the need for women to look a certain way in society in order to be seen as beautiful (Mulvey); • re-socialisation – the media can be an important agency of re- socialisation for some ethnic groups (Gillespie) helping to transmit and interpret society’s norms and values; • imitation – media theories such as the hypodermic model suggest that audiences copy what they see/hear in the media, particularly vulnerable groups such as children – copycat violence is one such example; • role models – members of the audience look up to people in the media and thus their ability to influence views and appearance are huge, e.g. the cult of celebrity, social media influencers; 4(d) • the media is said to be an important form of political socialisation – presenting the ‘status quo’ as normal and either omitting or ridiculing more radical and alternative viewpoints (Glasgow University Media Group); • the media is a secondary agency of socialisation and is thus important (along with the other agents) in reinforcing cultural norms and values; • other reasonable response. Band 0 [0 marks] No creditworthy response. Band 1 [1–3 marks] Answers in this band will show only a limited awareness of the question. A tendency to description is likely. Responses may be short and undeveloped and points stated without explanation. Sociological terms and concepts are unlikely to be used. At the bottom of the band (1 mark), expect one weak point. Higher in the band (2–3 marks), candidates may offer more than one weak point. Band 2 [4–6 marks] Answers in this band will show basic sociological knowledge and understanding. Responses may be underdeveloped and lacking in range. At the bottom of the band, candidates are unlikely to use sociological terms and concepts accurately. Higher in the band, candidates may be beginning to use sociological terms and concepts with greater accuracy. However, some aspects of the answer may only be partially developed/explained. Band 3 [7–8 marks] Answers in this band will show good sociological knowledge and understanding and will be well-developed and explained. Sociological terms and concepts will be used accurately overall. Answers will be well-focused on the question and there will be a range of points presented. At the top of the band explanations will be clear throughout. 4(e) To what extent is the media free from control and bias? 15 Candidates are likely to debate traditional media against new media, although this is not prescriptive. All valid answers and examples should be credited. It is likely that issues of content, control and ownership will be considered. Possible answers: FOR • pluralism – the media simply reflects and responds to its audience therefore it is free from control and bias; • narrowcasting – today’s digital media is able to cater for niche, specialist audiences and alternative viewpoints as well as the more traditional mass appeal broadcasting content therefore it is not biased, there is something for everyone; • ownership – the media is made up of both large corporations and independent companies therefore cannot be accused of bias; • citizen journalism – the public are now uploading media items themselves as they happen, e.g. news stories to the internet – this means today’s media is free from control and bias; • cost – the internet has meant that former issues of cost that prevented many groups from being able to create content has now been removed, so making the media free from control and bias; • access – the internet and the web mean that the media is now global, we are being exposed to cultural diversity on a regular basis so seeing different world perspectives – this makes the media free from control and bias; • muted voices – new media has given a voice and a space to those minority/powerless groups that previously found it hard to be part of the media, e.g. ethnic minorities, women, the disabled, demonstrating how the media is now free from control and bias; • hashtag campaigns – have allowed groups who feel an injustice or sense of discrimination to use the internet to connect with many others and to spread their message globally, e.g. #metoo – this demonstrates how the media is free from control and bias; • audience as producer – the audience and producer divide is no longer clear as audiences can create media, e.g. websites, upload material (prosumers) meaning there is little control and media is not biased; • digital media – this is ever-changing and global and thus is impossible to control; • due impartiality – many broadcasters are bound by codes of conduct that prevent them from being biased, e.g. the BBC/C4; • postmodernism – they believe the media today is a diverse institution with no ‘top down’ hierarchy – this means that the media cannot be controlled or used for propaganda or convey a dominant ideology; • other reasonable response. 4(e) AGAINST • media conglomerates increasingly dominate the ownership of the media and are increasing their powers further through diversification; • new media may be more free from control and bias but this is not the case for traditional media which is still highly regulated; • news values – these still determine the types of stories that typically make the news, resulting in homogenous and stereotypical content that is often biased, e.g. moral panics; • digital divide – based on factors such as money, location and age – mean that certain audience groups are not able to readily access and/or produce media content therefore for many people the media is as controlled and biased as it has ever been; • state control – regulatory bodies such as the BBFC and PEGI determine what can and cannot be included in media content, so controlling media; • censorship – this can be done by either private bodies or governments in order to control the content and distribution of media content which often results in biased output; • media gatekeepers – these are still typically male, middle class, white and middle aged – so reducing the diversity of content and opinion available in the media meaning that biased content remains the norm; • radical viewpoints – these are typically not easily available in the media with most content following the dominant ideology which is heavily controlled and very biased (GUMG); • Marxists – they believe that the media is a tool of the ruling class used to control the minds of the proletariat through the normalisation of capitalism and conservative indoctrination (Miliband) in its biased content; • Marxism – alternative/radical views in the media are typically marginalised and/or invisibilised meaning that the media controls its biased content; • propaganda – this is still a feature of the media proving that control and bias are still inherent to the industry, e.g. preventing the government and its policies favourably; • other reasonable response. 4(e) Band 0 [0 marks] No creditworthy response. Band 1 [1–4 marks] Answers in this band may be vague and largely based on common sense showing limited knowledge of the debate. Use of sociological terms or concepts is very unlikely. Responses may be short, undeveloped and one- sided. Lower in the band (1–2 marks), expect one or two weak points. Higher in the band (3–4 marks) candidates may offer more than two points and provide a weak definition of key terms in the question. Band 2 [5–8 marks] In this band candidates will show some basic knowledge of the debate. Alternatively, they may offer an answer which is list-like in nature but there will be no real attempt to assess the issues raised by the question. There may be limited/some use of sociological terms or concepts. Responses may be underdeveloped and lack range. Answers may be simplistic and two- sided or only cover one side of the debate. Lower in the band, the response may be rather narrow in the points covered and there may be some development. Higher in the band, more points are likely to be covered with some development. Alternatively, a list-like answer with some development covering both sides of the argument may score up to 8 marks. A one-sided answer cannot score higher than 8 marks. Band 3 [9–12 marks] Answers in this band will show good sociological knowledge and understanding of the debate. Sociological terms and concepts will be used with greater accuracy and/or frequency. For the most part, answers will be well-developed, focused on the questions and there will be a range of points presented. There will be a two-sided response but it may lack range on one side. At the bottom of the band, candidates may provide a narrower range of developed points. At the top of the band, expect a wider range of developed points and clear focus on the question. Band 4 [13–15 marks] Answers in this band will show excellent knowledge and understanding of the debate. There will be a strong grasp of the arguments as well as accurate and frequent use of sociological terms and concepts. Answers will be well-developed, clearly focused on the question and discuss a wide range of points. Responses will be two-sided and have a range of points on each side. At the bottom of the band (13 marks), the answer may lack a specific conclusion. Higher in the band, there will be a clear attempt to offer an assessment of the ‘To what extent.?’ part of the question through a focused conclusion.
2 Patterns of educational achievement vary across social groups. This has led some sociologists to question how fair the education system is and to investigate the reasons for inequalities within education. In their research sociologists consider factors such as the culture of masculinity, type of school attended and the importance of social conformity. (a) What is meant by the term ‘social conformity’? [2] (b) Describe two patterns of educational achievement. [4] (c) Explain how the culture of masculinity may affect the educational achievement of males. [6] (d) Explain why there are different types of schools. [8] (e) To what extent is the education system fair? [15] Section C: Crime, deviance and social control
35 marks
Mark scheme: 2(a) What is meant by the term ‘social conformity’? 2 One mark for partial definition, e.g. following the rules. Two marks for clear definition, e.g. fitting in with the social expectations for behaviour. 2(b) Describe two patterns of educational achievement. 4 Candidates will be expected to describe two patterns of educational achievement. The answer is likely to focus on social factors such as gender, social class and ethnicity. Possible answers: • gender – in many developing countries boys are more likely to receive an education than girls meaning that they achieve better; • gender – in modern industrial societies girls typically achieve higher than boys in terms of the amount of qualifications gained and the grades/levels achieved; • gender – subject choice – educational achievement is dependent upon the subjects chosen for study e.g. in the UK sociology is dominated by females, PE by males; • gender – over time – in modern industrial societies pre-1990’s boys achieved better than girls; • gender – over time – both boys and girls achieve better today than in the past; • gender – university – in modern industrial societies more girls are going to university than boys and achieving highly; • ethnicity – ethnic minority groups in a country typically do less well e.g. in the USA African-American students do not achieve as well as white American students; • ethnicity – traveller children (Roma/gypsies) typically do not do well within education; • ethnicity – in the UK, Indian and Chinese students achieve the best; • social class – students eligible for free school meals do less well than those who don’t qualify for this support; • social class – the higher a students’ social class position, the better they are likely to do in education; • social class – students in private schools achieve higher than students in state/government schools (better resources etc.); • other reasonable response. One mark for each point correctly identified (up to maximum of two). One mark for each point that is developed (up to a maximum of two). 2(c) Explain how the culture of masculinity may affect the educational 6 achievement of males. Candidates should discuss how the culture of masculinity may affect the educational achievement of males. Effects on educational achievement may be negative, positive or a combination of both. Possible answers: • boys may choose different subjects to girls e.g. PE, Design etc. as they feel they can do well in them; • boys’ leisure activities e.g. sports, video games may lead them to focus on activities not linked to school – this may negatively affect their educational achievement; • pressure to be masculine may lead some boys to join anti-school subcultures and so negatively affect their educational achievement e.g. Willis ‘the lads’; • aggressive masculine norms may mean that boys get into fights and arguments at school and so receive more sanctions, negatively affecting their educational achievement; • masculine behaviour e.g. toughness, street smartness etc. is not valued in education and so may result in teachers negatively labelling boys, thus leading to a self-fulfilling prophecy of underachievement; • wanting to look ‘cool’ may mean that boys do not study as much as girls leading to them being placed into lower sets thus negatively affecting their educational achievement; • the culture of masculinity may attract boys to gangs meaning that they drop out of school and do not succeed in their exams; • the culture of masculinity in schools may suggest male dominance and success e.g. males in positions of authority – these male role models may encourage boys to do well in school; • culture of masculinity in wider society makes boys believe they are more powerful and dominant than girls therefore they do not feel that they need to try at school as they are already dominant; • other reasonable response. Band 0 [0 marks] No creditworthy response. Band 1 [1–3 marks] Answers in this band will show only a limited awareness of the question. Responses may be short and un/underdeveloped. At the bottom of the band (1 mark), expect one weak point. Higher in the band (2–3 marks), candidates may offer more than one weak point, but there may be a tendency towards simplistic answers, engaging with sociological ideas without using sociological language. Band 2 [4–6 marks] Answers in this band will have clear and accurate explanation, showing good sociological knowledge and understanding. Sociological terms and concepts should be expected and explained. At the bottom of the band, the range of points covered may be narrow or lack detail. Higher in the band, answers will cover more than one point in a well-developed way or cover several points in less detail. 2(d) Explain why there are different types of schools. 8 Candidates should discuss the reasons why there are different types of schools. It is likely that specific types of schools will be explicitly discussed. Possible answers: • marketisation of education – means there needs to be choice in place for parents and students to decide which school a child attends; • single sex schools – proven to get higher results than mixed sex schools so feminists may say this is empowering for females; • faith schools – in a secular society little religious education may be taught at schools, therefore faith schools allow for the teaching of particular religious beliefs, norms and values; • private schools – typically produce the best results in the education system so allow parents who can afford the tuition fees to send their children there (selective education; • comprehensive education – based on principles of equality (meritocracy) and allow any student to attend, so giving equal opportunities to all; • special schools – allow students with additional needs e.g. learning disabilities, to be specifically supported and catered for in their education; • primary schools – allows for a more generic curriculum to be taught to students that inculcates them with society’s norms and values; • secondary schools – allows for a more specialist and academic curriculum to be followed, building upon the foundations taught at the primary level; • technical schools – allows students to be best prepared for the world of work through vocational courses and qualifications; • Marxism – private schools maintain social inequalities through the creation of an elite education for the rich – needed to support capitalism and elitism; • choice – different types of schools mean that everyone’s needs are catered for (postmodernism) in a diverse society; • parental attitudes and beliefs – Montessori schools are thought by some to be a more natural and enjoyable way for children to learn that help students develop the social, emotional, and intellectual skills they need for long-term success in school and in life; • IQ – different types of schools exist in order to cater for different ability levels of students e.g. the tripartite system, academic vs vocational schools etc.; • other reasonable response 2(d) Band 0 [0 marks] No creditworthy response. Band 1 [1–3 marks] Answers in this band will show only a limited awareness of the question. A tendency to description is likely. Responses may be short and undeveloped and points stated without explanation. Sociological terms and concepts are unlikely to be used. At the bottom of the band (1 mark), expect one weak point. Higher in the band (2–3 marks), candidates may offer more than one weak point. Band 2 [4–6 marks] Answers in this band will show basic sociological knowledge and understanding. Responses may be underdeveloped and lacking in range. At the bottom of the band, candidates are unlikely to use sociological terms and concepts accurately. Higher in the band, candidates may be beginning to use sociological terms and concepts with greater accuracy. However, some aspects of the answer may only be partially developed/explained. Band 3 [7–8 marks] Answers in this band will show good sociological knowledge and understanding and will be well-developed and explained. Sociological terms and concepts will be used accurately overall. Answers will be well-focused on the question and there will be a range of points presented. At the top of the band explanations will be clear throughout. 2(e) To what extent is the education system fair? 15 Candidates should consider the ways in which the education system can be seen to be fair. In evaluation, the reasons why it is not so fair or not fair for everyone should be discussed. Possible answers: FOR • functionalism – the education system is meritocratic; everyone has the same opportunities to be successful; • equality legislation – this ensures that all social groups are given the right to education and that they cannot be discriminated against by teachers; • option subjects – these allow students to choose their own curriculum path that best suits their own talents and interests – this is clearly fair; • national curriculum – this ensures that all students study the same core subjects so that everyone has the same basic grounding; • setting and streaming – students are put into classes that best suit their needs and abilities – this gives everyone the best chance of being educationally successful; • both vocational and academic educational qualifications are available to students – this allows them to make the best choice for themselves; • scholarships – fee paying schools offer scholarships and bursaries to ensure that money does not prevent bright students from receiving a top education; • selective role – education acts as a filtering system (functionalism) to ensure that the brightest students are stretched and challenged to achieve highly and the weaker students are offered courses and levels that better suit their needs; • comprehensive schools – anyone can attend this type of school, regardless of educational ability or social factors, so making the system fair; • parental choice – in a lot of countries, parents have free choice to decide where to apply for their child’s schooling, making the system fair; • other reasonable response. 2(e) AGAINST • private education (Marxism) – fee paying private schools get better exam results on average than state schools, meaning that those students who can afford to attend are likely to do better due to factors such as higher expectations, smaller class sizes and better schools resources; • ethnocentric curriculum – if the curriculum is biased towards the majority group in society and marginalises other ethnic and cultural experiences then this cannot be fair; • gendered subject choice – feminists believe that students subject choices remain gendered and that this is often encouraged by teachers and careers advisors – this can limit certain fields of high status/high paying employment later in life; • role modelling – positions of authority in schools are said to be dominated by white males – this implies that other social groups are less likely to be successful which is not fair; • cultural capital (Bourdieu) – middle class children arrive at school with the norms and values that are inherent in an academic education, this makes school an easier and more enjoyable experience for them; • material deprivation – those students across all schools who can afford private tutoring, revision resources and study supports are likely to do better than those who cannot – this isn’t fair; • funding – schools in different areas, even within the same country, are funded at different levels per pupil meaning that some schools have more opportunities than others to offer more extra-curricular activities, smaller teacher-pupil ratios and more specialist equipment and teachers; • teacher labelling – this has been proven to disadvantage certain groups of students in schools who are stereotyped to be ‘troublemakers’ or ‘less bright’ – this is not fair; • other reasonable response. 2(e) Band 0 [0 marks] No creditworthy response. Band 1 [1–4 marks] Answers in this band may be vague and largely based on common sense showing limited knowledge of the debate. Use of sociological terms or concepts is very unlikely. Responses may be short, undeveloped and one- sided. Lower in the band (1–2 marks), expect one or two weak points. Higher in the band (3–4 marks) candidates may offer more than two points and provide a weak definition of key terms in the question. Band 2 [5–8 marks] In this band candidates will show some basic knowledge of the debate. Alternatively, they may offer an answer which is list-like in nature but there will be no real attempt to assess the issues raised by the question. There may be limited/some use of sociological terms or concepts. Responses may be underdeveloped and lack range. Answers may be simplistic and two- sided or only cover one side of the debate. Lower in the band, the response may be rather narrow in the points covered and there may be some development. Higher in the band, more points are likely to be covered with some development. Alternatively, a list-like answer with some development covering both sides of the argument may score up to 8 marks. A one-sided answer cannot score higher than 8 marks. Band 3 [9–12 marks] Answers in this band will show good sociological knowledge and understanding of the debate. Sociological terms and concepts will be used with greater accuracy and/or frequency. For the most part, answers will be well-developed, focused on the questions and there will be a range of points presented. There will be a two-sided response but it may lack range on one side. At the bottom of the band, candidates may provide a narrower range of developed points. At the top of the band, expect a wider range of developed points and clear focus on the question. Band 4 [13–15 marks] Answers in this band will show excellent knowledge and understanding of the debate. There will be a strong grasp of the arguments as well as accurate and frequent use of sociological terms and concepts. Answers will be well-developed, clearly focused on the question and discuss a wide range of points. Responses will be two-sided and have a range of points on each side. At the bottom of the band (13 marks), the answer may lack a specific conclusion. Higher in the band, there will be a clear attempt to offer an assessment of the ‘To what extent?’ part of the question through a focused conclusion.
4 Some sociologists argue that globalisation has improved equality in the media. Other sociologists believe there is now a digital divide and that moral panics and stereotypical representations still exist. However, whether media content affects the audience is a debate within sociology. Despite this most sociologists agree that not everybody uses the media in the same way due to social factors such as gender and ethnicity. (a) What is meant by the term ‘moral panic’? [2] (b) Describe two ways globalisation has affected the media. [4] (c) Explain how different ethnic groups use the media. [6] (d) Explain why some sociologists criticise stereotypical gender representations in the media. [8] (e) To what extent is the hypodermic-syringe model an accurate explanation of how the media affects audiences? [15]
35 marks
Mark scheme: 4(a) What is meant by the term ‘moral panic’? 2 One mark for partial definition, e.g. a negative media story. Two marks for clear definition, e.g. an exaggerated social reaction to deviance, creating public fear. 4(b) Describe two ways globalisation has affected the media. 4 Candidates will be expected to describe two ways globalisation has affected the media. They could consider factors such as content, ownership, access, distribution etc. Possible answers: • access – media is now instantly available around the globe via the internet and digital technology; • ownership – large media companies typically own and distribute media across the globe e.g. Disney; • streaming – digital media can be streamed live from nearly all areas of the globe to anywhere in the world; • media products – products today are often made for a global rather than a national audience e.g. advertising and the lowest common denominator; • non-Western media – because the media is now global, non-Western products can be accessed globally e.g. Nollywood films; • the global village – McLuhan – new media has made the media world a smaller place making it easier for consumers to access material from anywhere in the world; • culture – globalisation may mean that local cultures are swamped with western culture spread by the media and so may dilute their own language, culture and traditions; • other reasonable response. One mark for each point correctly identified (up to maximum of two). One mark for each point that is developed (up to a maximum of two). 4(c) Explain how different ethnic groups use the media. 6 Candidates should discuss how different ethnic groups use the media. Possible answers: • specialist media from the ethnic minority’s country of origin is now widely available in the native language through for e.g. satellite TV, allowing cultures to be maintained; • different ethnic groups have different cultural traditions that can be incorporated into the media e.g. Nollywood, Bollywood etc; • ethnic minorities are increasingly owning and producing media for their own ethnic community e.g. in the UK Pride magazine, The Voice etc. to demonstrate cultural pride and heritage; • ethnic minorities may not ‘read’ the media in the same way as the ethnic majority and may use the media as a form of cultural borrowing e.g. Gillespie study; • new media has made it increasingly easy for ethnic minorities to produce and access global media targeted specifically at their ethnic group; • ethnic minorities may use the media to reinforce traditional cultural traditions, norms and values; • some ethnic minorities may use media output to learn about the majority culture/language; • to reject a muted voice – interactive new media, user generated content, drill music etc can all give young ethnic minorities a platform to address social inequalities; • other reasonable response. Band 0 [0 marks] No creditworthy response. Band 1 [1–3 marks] Answers in this band will show only a limited awareness of the question. Responses may be short and un/underdeveloped. At the bottom of the band (1 mark), expect one weak point. Higher in the band (2–3 marks), candidates may offer more than one weak point, but there may be a tendency towards simplistic answers, engaging with sociological ideas without using sociological language. Band 2 [4–6 marks] Answers in this band will have clear and accurate explanation, showing good sociological knowledge and understanding. Sociological terms and concepts should be expected and explained. At the bottom of the band, the range of points covered may be narrow or lack detail. Higher in the band, answers will cover more than one point in a well-developed way or cover several points in less detail. 4(d) Explain why some sociologists criticise stereotypical gender 8 representations in the media. Candidates should discuss the reasons why some sociologists criticise stereotypical gender representations in the media. Possible answers: • binary opposition – the media typically shows males and females as opposites e.g. strong males and weak females – this is overly simplistic and untrue; • under-representation – females are said to be under-represented in most areas of the media e.g. main characters are still males, implying that males are more important than females (feminism); • roles – both males and females are shown in a narrow range of roles which can limit their aspirations and opportunities in society; • physical appearance – there remains a focus upon how females look within the media reinforcing stereotypical expectations e.g. McRobbie’s ‘slimblondeness’; • digital manipulation – males and females seen in today’s media are so digitally altered that real people are unable to attain these looks. This leads to people feeling inadequate and unable to reach these levels of perfection and has been linked to rising eating disorders; • passive females – this representation leads to women being perceived as weak as incapable and thus reinforces their subordinate positions in society (feminism); • aggressive males – this representation leads to men being perceived as more dangerous, threatening and criminal than women and may explain the manifold moral panics concerning males and the police targeting of males; • sexualisation of females – feminists are critical of the sexualised representations in the media that have become normalised of women e.g. Mulvey’s male gaze theory; • mental health – gender representations have been criticised for being dangerous to those consuming them e.g. very thin models on the catwalk have been blamed for rises in eating disorders; • hegemonic masculinity (Connell) – the media’s dominant representation of males in this stereotyped way makes it hard for men to show their emotions, take responsibility for childcare and to enter the caring professions; • other reasonable response. Band 0 [0 marks] No creditworthy response. Band 1 [1–3 marks] Answers in this band will show only a limited awareness of the question. A tendency to description is likely. Responses may be short and undeveloped and points stated without explanation. Sociological terms and concepts are unlikely to be used. At the bottom of the band (1 mark), expect one weak point. Higher in the band (2–3 marks), candidates may offer more than one weak point. 4(d) Band 2 [4–6 marks] Answers in this band will show basic sociological knowledge and understanding. Responses may be underdeveloped and lacking in range. At the bottom of the band, candidates are unlikely to use sociological terms and concepts accurately. Higher in the band, candidates may be beginning to use sociological terms and concepts with greater accuracy. However, some aspects of the answer may only be partially developed/explained. Band 3 [7–8 marks] Answers in this band will show good sociological knowledge and understanding and will be well-developed and explained. Sociological terms and concepts will be used accurately overall. Answers will be well-focused on the question and there will be a range of points presented. At the top of the band explanations will be clear throughout. 4(e) To what extent is the hypodermic-syringe model an accurate 15 explanation of how the media affects audiences? Candidates should consider the ways in which the hypodermic-syringe model of media effects is an accurate explanation of how the media affects audiences. In evaluation, the reasons why it may not be accurate should be discussed. Possible answers: FOR • passive audience – if the audience are using the media as a form of entertainment/escapism then they may be more likely to accept the content without question; • 24/7 media – the media is so pervasive in society today that it is difficult to escape it and thus it may be more likely to affect the audience (media culture); • advertising – this industry is based upon the principles from the hypodermic model – that the audience are influenced and persuaded by the media they consume; • propaganda – the media has frequently been used as a source of propaganda throughout history e.g. Nazi Germany, therefore it must be able to influence the audience; • media violence – there have been several instances of the audience copying what they have seen in the media e.g. video games, video ‘nasties’, horror films etc. – this shows the power of the media to influence the audience; • voting – biased coverage of politics and elections in the media demonstrates how the media can influence the audience, e.g. The Sun newspaper in the UK’s influence over election results; • stereotyping – stereotypes are regularly criticised in the media (e.g. gender, ethnic, age etc) as being potentially harmful to people in society and contributing to social inequalities – gender stereotyping in advertising has now been banned, indicating the harmful influence that it must have had upon the audience; • censorship – if there wasn’t truth to the hypodermic model’s claims about the power of the media then there would be no need for censorship in the media; • other reasonable response. 4(e) AGAINST • it is unlikely that the media has direct and immediate effects upon the audience, any effects that it does have are more likely to be built up over time (cultural effects theory); • the hypodermic model’s methodology (Bandura’s experiment) is heavily flawed therefore what credible evidence exists to support this model of media effects?; • the hypodermic model has morphed into the two-step flow model today whereby the role of an ‘opinion leader’ in influencing the audience is thought to be crucial – no mention was made of this in the original hypodermic model; • it is now thought that the effects of the media cannot be generalised in the way that the hypodermic model did – factors such as age, intelligence, gender etc all influence how much we are affected by different forms and content of media; • audience selection – we do not have to believe everything that we consume in the media, different audiences encode the media differently (Hall’s reception theory); • active audience – the audience today are not passive consumers, we choose from a plethora of media options, personalise our consumption, stream, use on-demand services and even create our own media; • Glasgow University Media Group – their research showed that the audience can distinguish between fact and fiction and therefore are not simply soaking up what the media tells them; • uses and gratifications – audiences are in control of what they consume and how it effects them – we choose different forms and varieties of media to serve different need and purposes; • new media – blogs, vlogs, forums, uploads, social media platforms, citizen journalism etc. all mean that the audience is today creating and shaping the media – the very opposite of the claims made by the hypodermic model; • other reasonable response. Band 0 [0 marks] No creditworthy response. Band 1 [1–4 marks] Answers in this band may be vague and largely based on common sense showing limited knowledge of the debate. Use of sociological terms or concepts is very unlikely. Responses may be short, undeveloped and one- sided. Lower in the band (1–2 marks), expect one or two weak points. Higher in the band (3–4 marks) candidates may offer more than two points and provide a weak definition of key terms in the question. 4(e) Band 2 [5–8 marks] In this band candidates will show some basic knowledge of the debate. Alternatively, they may offer an answer which is list-like in nature but there will be no real attempt to assess the issues raised by the question. There may be limited/some use of sociological terms or concepts. Responses may be underdeveloped and lack range. Answers may be simplistic and two- sided or only cover one side of the debate. Lower in the band, the response may be rather narrow in the points covered and there may be some development. Higher in the band, more points are likely to be covered with some development. Alternatively, a list-like answer with some development covering both sides of the argument may score up to 8 marks. A one-sided answer cannot score higher than 8 marks. Band 3 [9–12 marks] Answers in this band will show good sociological knowledge and understanding of the debate. Sociological terms and concepts will be used with greater accuracy and/or frequency. For the most part, answers will be well-developed, focused on the questions and there will be a range of points presented. There will be a two-sided response but it may lack range on one side. At the bottom of the band, candidates may provide a narrower range of developed points. At the top of the band, expect a wider range of developed points and clear focus on the question. Band 4 [13–15 marks] Answers in this band will show excellent knowledge and understanding of the debate. There will be a strong grasp of the arguments as well as accurate and frequent use of sociological terms and concepts. Answers will be well-developed, clearly focused on the question and discuss a wide range of points. Responses will be two-sided and have a range of points on each side. At the bottom of the band (13 marks), the answer may lack a specific conclusion. Higher in the band, there will be a clear attempt to offer an assessment of the ‘To what extent.?’ part of the question through a focused conclusion.
3 Agencies of social control all try to create conformity in society. Despite this, crime and deviance still occur in many forms such as burglary, murder and corporate crime. Crime rates are produced by the police, courts and government to understand trends in offending and to help find solutions to crime. However, many sociologists believe that the official measurements of crime are not very accurate. (a) What is meant by the term ‘conformity’? [2] (b) Describe two examples of corporate crime. [4] (c) Explain how informal agencies of social control can prevent crime. [6] (d) Explain why official measurements of crime may not always be accurate. [8] (e) To what extent is gender the most important factor in determining whether an individual commits crime? [15] Section D: Media
35 marks
Mark scheme: 3(a) What is meant by the term ‘conformity’? 2 One mark for partial definition, e.g. fitting in. Two marks for clear definition, e.g. attitudes and behaviour fit in with those of the dominant social group. 3(b) Describe two examples of corporate crime. 4 Candidates will be expected to describe two examples of corporate crime. Possible answers: • false claims – companies may falsely claim on insurance policies in order to accrue money; • tax evasion – not paying correct taxes on profits made, e.g. General Electric, Starbucks; • violations of environmental laws – e.g. a company disposes of its waste illegally/pollution; • business/financial fraud – embezzlement of money in order to increase the company’s profits, e.g. Enron; • bribery – of public officials in order to benefit the company, e.g. to get planning permission; • insider trading – manipulation of the financial stock market in order to make the company money; • corporate manslaughter – e.g. when workers die due to the company’s failure to follow health and safety legislation, e.g. Far West Water; • selling a deadly/dangerous product, e.g. thalidomide drug/Peanut corporation of America; • other reasonable response. One mark for each point correctly identified (up to maximum of two). One mark for each point that is developed (up to a maximum of two). 3(c) Explain how informal agencies of social control can prevent crime. 6 Candidates should discuss the ways informal agencies of social control, e.g. schools, families, media, workplace, religion and peers can prevent crime. Possible answers: • informal sanctions – such as ridicule, comments and disapproving looks – persuade people not to commit crime as they internalise that these reactions are negative ones; • Informal agencies typically have close relationships with individuals therefore have more influence over them in persuading them not to commit crime; • religion – has rules regarding behaviour for their followers which typically ensures criminal behaviour is avoided, e.g. the 10 commandments in Christianity forbid certain actions; • media – reporting criminal behaviour and creating folk devils makes people realise criminal actions will be punished and stigmatised; • family – act as role models for their offspring and so will ensure sanctions are put in place to prevent rule breaking behaviour, e.g. grounding; • education – the hidden curriculum transmits a set of values that encourages conformity and non-criminal behaviour; • peer group – positive peer pressure and the values of one’s sub-culture can ensure that members do not commit criminal acts; • workplace – will often use severe sanctions such as sackings, demotions, etc. if criminal behaviour occurs – this deters individuals; • other reasonable response. Band 0 [0 marks] No creditworthy response. Band 1 [1–3 marks] Answers in this band will show only a limited awareness of the question. Responses may be short and un/underdeveloped. At the bottom of the band (1 mark), expect one weak point. Higher in the band (2–3 marks), candidates may offer more than one weak point, but there may be a tendency towards simplistic answers, engaging with sociological ideas without using sociological language. Band 2 [4–6 marks] Answers in this band will have clear and accurate explanation, showing good sociological knowledge and understanding. Sociological terms and concepts should be expected and explained. At the bottom of the band, the range of points covered may be narrow or lack detail. Higher in the band, answers will cover more than one point in a well-developed way or cover several points in less detail. 3(d) Explain why official measurements of crime may not always be 8 accurate. Candidates should discuss issues with the official measurements of crime, e.g. the OCS. This is likely to consider problems of both reporting and recording but this is not essential. Possible answers: • most crimes that make it to the statistics are reported to the police either by victim or witness – if a crime is not reported then it will not make the statistics (dark figure of crime); • trivial crimes – often not reported to the police as people do not believe the police can do anything; • benefit to victims – crimes involving insured items are much more likely to be reported to the police as the insurance company requires a crime number; • reprisal – victims and witnesses may not report a crime to the police if they fear they will be threatened with reprisal, e.g. gangs; • embarrassment – victims may not report crimes to the police because they are embarrassed about what has happened • e.g. sexual crimes – these are notoriously under-reported; • invisible crimes – many white-collar and corporate crimes are unlikely to come to the attention of the police as they are either unknown about or dealt with internally by the company involved; • police discretion – not all crimes reported to the police are recorded in the statistics; • cuffing – police are under pressure to achieve targets and so may manipulate statistics to create a good impression of the job they do, e.g. by downgrading a crime’s seriousness or filing it as a false report; • other reasonable response. Band 0 [0 marks] No creditworthy response. Band 1 [1–3 marks] Answers in this band will show only a limited awareness of the question. A tendency to description is likely. Responses may be short and undeveloped and points stated without explanation. Sociological terms and concepts are unlikely to be used. At the bottom of the band (1 mark), expect one weak point. Higher in the band (2–3 marks), candidates may offer more than one weak point. Band 2 [4–6 marks] Answers in this band will show basic sociological knowledge and understanding. Responses may be underdeveloped and lacking in range. At the bottom of the band, candidates are unlikely to use sociological terms and concepts accurately. Higher in the band, candidates may be beginning to use sociological terms and concepts with greater accuracy. However, some aspects of the answer may only be partially developed/explained. 3(d) Band 3 [7–8 marks] Answers in this band will show good sociological knowledge and understanding and will be well-developed and explained. Sociological terms and concepts will be used accurately overall. Answers will be well-focused on the question and there will be a range of points presented. At the top of the band explanations will be clear throughout. 3(e) To what extent is gender the most important factor in determining 15 whether an individual commits crime? Candidates should consider how gender may determine whether an individual commits crime. This means they could look at either men or women or both genders. In evaluation they may argue that it is other social factors rather than gender that are most important, e.g. age, ethnicity and/or social class. Possible answers: FOR • masculinity – crime is a way of achieving masculinity for males and thus increasing their status; • risk taking behaviour – males are more likely to take risks and commit ‘edgework’ (postmodernism) than females which may account for their higher crime rate; • aggression – this is a way for males to assert their masculinity against other males or females (expressive crime/protector role); • breadwinner – traditional gender roles say that the man should provide for his family, if he cannot do this legitimately then he may turn to crime; • gangs – are dominated by males and gangs initiation ceremonies and lifestyle choices often involve criminal behaviour, e.g. drug dealing; • socialisation – girls and boys are socialised differently – girls to be passive, males to be active (Oakley) – this may result in higher levels of male criminality; • social control – girls are more socially controlled than boys and so may have less chance to commit crime, e.g. street culture versus bedroom subculture; • biology – testosterone and greater physical strength mean that males are more likely to commit criminal/deviant acts than females; • labelling and stereotyping – those in the CJS are likely to perceive males as being the most likely to commit crime and so target them – this can lead to a self-fulfilling prophecy (Becker, Cicourel); • other reasonable response. 3(e) AGAINST • self-report studies show that the number of female offences is under- estimated which implies that the idea that gender is a reason to explain criminality is wrong; • as society becomes more egalitarian so it seems that female criminality rises, e.g. girl gangs, ladettes, which implies that crime cannot be explained by gender; • police labelling – Cicourel says there is a picture of a ‘typical delinquent’ in the police and courts heads that criminals are male – this means males are more likely to be stopped and searched and arrested than females not that they are actually any more criminal (chivalry thesis – Pollak); • age – is said by many sociologists to be more important than gender in explaining criminality, e.g. most offenders are young; • ethnicity – is said by many sociologists to be a more important social factor than gender – ethnic minorities are disproportionately reflected in the criminal population, e.g. prison rates; • social class – many sociologists believe that it is a person’s class position that is the most influential in determining their criminality • e.g. the lower a person’s class, the higher their rates of offending; • type of crime – rates of shoplifting are similar for both males and females making it difficult to argue that gender is a reason to explain different offending rates; • Interpretivism – people commit crimes for different reasons and to generalise that this is because of their gender is misleading; • other reasonable response. Band 0 [0 marks] No creditworthy response. Band 1 [1–4 marks] Answers in this band may be vague and largely based on common sense showing limited knowledge of the debate. Use of sociological terms or concepts is very unlikely. Responses may be short, undeveloped and one- sided. Lower in the band (1–2 marks), expect one or two weak points. Higher in the band (3–4 marks) candidates may offer more than two points and provide a weak definition of key terms in the question. Band 2 [5–8 marks] In this band candidates will show some basic knowledge of the debate. Alternatively, they may offer an answer which is list-like in nature but there will be no real attempt to assess the issues raised by the question. There may be limited/some use of sociological terms or concepts. Responses may be underdeveloped and lack range. Answers may be simplistic and two- sided or only cover one side of the debate. Lower in the band, the response may be rather narrow in the points covered and there may be some development. Higher in the band, more points are likely to be covered with some development. Alternatively, a list-like answer with some development covering both sides of the argument may score up to 8 marks. A one-sided answer cannot score higher than 8 marks. 3(e) Band 3 [9–12 marks] Answers in this band will show good sociological knowledge and understanding of the debate. Sociological terms and concepts will be used with greater accuracy and/or frequency. For the most part, answers will be well-developed, focused on the questions and there will be a range of points presented. There will be a two-sided response but it may lack range on one side. At the bottom of the band, candidates may provide a narrower range of developed points. At the top of the band, expect a wider range of developed points and clear focus on the question. Band 4 [13–15 marks] Answers in this band will show excellent knowledge and understanding of the debate. There will be a strong grasp of the arguments as well as accurate and frequent use of sociological terms and concepts. Answers will be well-developed, clearly focused on the question and discuss a wide range of points. Responses will be two-sided and have a range of points on each side. At the bottom of the band (13 marks), the answer may lack a specific conclusion. Higher in the band, there will be a clear attempt to offer an assessment of the ‘To what extent.?’ part of the question through a focused conclusion.
4 Societies and cultures are changing rapidly and it is in the media that the biggest changes are occurring. New media is very different to traditional media. New media is believed to be interactive and free from control and bias. However, all media including the internet, broadcasting and the film industry provides the audience with information and entertainment. The media also socialises and educates individuals. (a) What is meant by the term ‘broadcasting’? [2] (b) Describe two ways young people are living in a media culture. [4] (c) Explain how new media is interactive. [6] (d) Explain why the media is an important agency of socialisation. [8] (e) To what extent is the media free from control and bias? [15]
35 marks
Mark scheme: 4(a) What is meant by the term ‘broadcasting’? 2 One mark for partial definition, e.g. TV and radio. Two marks for clear definition, e.g. transmitting radio or TV to large audiences. 4(b) Describe two ways young people are living in a media culture. 4 Candidates will be expected to describe two ways young people are living in a media culture. This may be demonstrated through examples. Possible answers: • time – young people spend more time interacting with and using the media than any other age group; • interactivity – new media immerses young people into a way of life where online communication and relationships become the norm; • social media – most young people take part in social media, sharing stories, photos, videos, etc., virtual communities are part of most young people’s lives; • digital natives – young people have been brought up to see new, digital media as the norm therefore it forms a part of their everyday norms and values; • postmodernism – these theorists claim that society is now so media saturated that a young person’s way of life is dominated by the media; • citizen journalism – the ability to film and share live news and events via the internet means that young people are continuously living in a media culture; 4(b) • cult of celebrity – celebrities, reality TV stars and sports people have become role models and ‘stars’ for young people who follow them on social media, subscribe to fan sites and engage with their websites, e.g. influencers; • postmodernism – hyper-reality = the media constructs for young people a world that they have no real life experience of, thus creating reality through a media culture; • advertising – the proliferation of advertising and marketing opportunities in all areas of life means that young people are now living in a media culture; • convergence – technology has developed to allow young people to access media across various different platforms from a wide variety of devices – a portable and instant media culture is formed; • pluralism – competition and choice = more media is available and targeted at young people than ever before; • other reasonable response. One mark for each point correctly identified (up to maximum of two). One mark for each point that is developed (up to a maximum of two). 4(c) Explain how new media is interactive. 6 Candidate’s should consider the ways that today’s media allow for interactivity. Possible answers: • personalised media usage – e.g. having news on particular topics emailed directly to you; • create own media – write a blog, create a website, upload videos and/or photos, tweet (Twitter), etc. (user generated content); • online discussion – contribute to this via forums, social media and message boards and reply immediately to others; • role play and gaming – immersing yourself into a fantasy world and role playing a particular part, often competing against users in other countries and communicating with them through the medium/game; • instant voting on live TV for something or someone, e.g. a talent show winner, a point of view, a multi-choice quiz question; • citizen journalism – the audience can now create media material through uploading live footage; • youtube channels/Instagram/tiktok, etc. – allow members of the audience to create their own media output and interact with viewers or comment on other creators channels/posts/videos; • social media influencers and vloggers regularly interact with their fans and let them ‘into their virtual lives’, e.g. Zoella; • other reasonable response. 4(c) Band 0 [0 marks] No creditworthy response. Band 1 [1–3 marks] Answers in this band will show only a limited awareness of the question. Responses may be short and un/underdeveloped. At the bottom of the band (1 mark), expect one weak point. Higher in the band (2–3 marks), candidates may offer more than one weak point, but there may be a tendency towards simplistic answers, engaging with sociological ideas without using sociological language. Band 2 [4–6 marks] Answers in this band will have clear and accurate explanation, showing good sociological knowledge and understanding. Sociological terms and concepts should be expected and explained. At the bottom of the band, the range of points covered may be narrow or lack detail. Higher in the band, answers will cover more than one point in a well-developed way or cover several points in less detail. 4(d) Explain why the media is an important agency of socialisation. 8 Candidates should discuss reasons why the media is an important agency of socialisation. They are likely to discuss processes such as imitation and/or specific examples and case studies. Possible answers: • Marxism – the media convey the dominant norms, values and ideology and so keep the population in a state of false consciousness; • postmodernism – the media saturated society and multiple platforms that now dominate the industry makes it easier than ever before for people to be influenced by the media; • feminism – believe messages and images in the media are patriarchal and that this becomes represented as normal – so teaching the audience to think of males and females in very different ways, e.g. stereotyping; • invisibility – by giving some social groups prominence in the media and invisibilising others, the media is highly influential in determining what the audience think of as ‘normal’/important; • male gaze – the media objectifies females for the pleasure of males – this legitimises the need for women to look a certain way in society in order to be seen as beautiful (Mulvey); • re-socialisation – the media can be an important agency of re- socialisation for some ethnic groups (Gillespie) helping to transmit and interpret society’s norms and values; • imitation – media theories such as the hypodermic model suggest that audiences copy what they see/hear in the media, particularly vulnerable groups such as children – copycat violence is one such example; • role models – members of the audience look up to people in the media and thus their ability to influence views and appearance are huge, e.g. the cult of celebrity, social media influencers; 4(d) • the media is said to be an important form of political socialisation – presenting the ‘status quo’ as normal and either omitting or ridiculing more radical and alternative viewpoints (Glasgow University Media Group); • the media is a secondary agency of socialisation and is thus important (along with the other agents) in reinforcing cultural norms and values; • other reasonable response. Band 0 [0 marks] No creditworthy response. Band 1 [1–3 marks] Answers in this band will show only a limited awareness of the question. A tendency to description is likely. Responses may be short and undeveloped and points stated without explanation. Sociological terms and concepts are unlikely to be used. At the bottom of the band (1 mark), expect one weak point. Higher in the band (2–3 marks), candidates may offer more than one weak point. Band 2 [4–6 marks] Answers in this band will show basic sociological knowledge and understanding. Responses may be underdeveloped and lacking in range. At the bottom of the band, candidates are unlikely to use sociological terms and concepts accurately. Higher in the band, candidates may be beginning to use sociological terms and concepts with greater accuracy. However, some aspects of the answer may only be partially developed/explained. Band 3 [7–8 marks] Answers in this band will show good sociological knowledge and understanding and will be well-developed and explained. Sociological terms and concepts will be used accurately overall. Answers will be well-focused on the question and there will be a range of points presented. At the top of the band explanations will be clear throughout. 4(e) To what extent is the media free from control and bias? 15 Candidates are likely to debate traditional media against new media, although this is not prescriptive. All valid answers and examples should be credited. It is likely that issues of content, control and ownership will be considered. Possible answers: FOR • pluralism – the media simply reflects and responds to its audience therefore it is free from control and bias; • narrowcasting – today’s digital media is able to cater for niche, specialist audiences and alternative viewpoints as well as the more traditional mass appeal broadcasting content therefore it is not biased, there is something for everyone; • ownership – the media is made up of both large corporations and independent companies therefore cannot be accused of bias; • citizen journalism – the public are now uploading media items themselves as they happen, e.g. news stories to the internet – this means today’s media is free from control and bias; • cost – the internet has meant that former issues of cost that prevented many groups from being able to create content has now been removed, so making the media free from control and bias; • access – the internet and the web mean that the media is now global, we are being exposed to cultural diversity on a regular basis so seeing different world perspectives – this makes the media free from control and bias; • muted voices – new media has given a voice and a space to those minority/powerless groups that previously found it hard to be part of the media, e.g. ethnic minorities, women, the disabled, demonstrating how the media is now free from control and bias; • hashtag campaigns – have allowed groups who feel an injustice or sense of discrimination to use the internet to connect with many others and to spread their message globally, e.g. #metoo – this demonstrates how the media is free from control and bias; • audience as producer – the audience and producer divide is no longer clear as audiences can create media, e.g. websites, upload material (prosumers) meaning there is little control and media is not biased; • digital media – this is ever-changing and global and thus is impossible to control; • due impartiality – many broadcasters are bound by codes of conduct that prevent them from being biased, e.g. the BBC/C4; • postmodernism – they believe the media today is a diverse institution with no ‘top down’ hierarchy – this means that the media cannot be controlled or used for propaganda or convey a dominant ideology; • other reasonable response. 4(e) AGAINST • media conglomerates increasingly dominate the ownership of the media and are increasing their powers further through diversification; • new media may be more free from control and bias but this is not the case for traditional media which is still highly regulated; • news values – these still determine the types of stories that typically make the news, resulting in homogenous and stereotypical content that is often biased, e.g. moral panics; • digital divide – based on factors such as money, location and age – mean that certain audience groups are not able to readily access and/or produce media content therefore for many people the media is as controlled and biased as it has ever been; • state control – regulatory bodies such as the BBFC and PEGI determine what can and cannot be included in media content, so controlling media; • censorship – this can be done by either private bodies or governments in order to control the content and distribution of media content which often results in biased output; • media gatekeepers – these are still typically male, middle class, white and middle aged – so reducing the diversity of content and opinion available in the media meaning that biased content remains the norm; • radical viewpoints – these are typically not easily available in the media with most content following the dominant ideology which is heavily controlled and very biased (GUMG); • Marxists – they believe that the media is a tool of the ruling class used to control the minds of the proletariat through the normalisation of capitalism and conservative indoctrination (Miliband) in its biased content; • Marxism – alternative/radical views in the media are typically marginalised and/or invisibilised meaning that the media controls its biased content; • propaganda – this is still a feature of the media proving that control and bias are still inherent to the industry, e.g. preventing the government and its policies favourably; • other reasonable response. 4(e) Band 0 [0 marks] No creditworthy response. Band 1 [1–4 marks] Answers in this band may be vague and largely based on common sense showing limited knowledge of the debate. Use of sociological terms or concepts is very unlikely. Responses may be short, undeveloped and one- sided. Lower in the band (1–2 marks), expect one or two weak points. Higher in the band (3–4 marks) candidates may offer more than two points and provide a weak definition of key terms in the question. Band 2 [5–8 marks] In this band candidates will show some basic knowledge of the debate. Alternatively, they may offer an answer which is list-like in nature but there will be no real attempt to assess the issues raised by the question. There may be limited/some use of sociological terms or concepts. Responses may be underdeveloped and lack range. Answers may be simplistic and two- sided or only cover one side of the debate. Lower in the band, the response may be rather narrow in the points covered and there may be some development. Higher in the band, more points are likely to be covered with some development. Alternatively, a list-like answer with some development covering both sides of the argument may score up to 8 marks. A one-sided answer cannot score higher than 8 marks. Band 3 [9–12 marks] Answers in this band will show good sociological knowledge and understanding of the debate. Sociological terms and concepts will be used with greater accuracy and/or frequency. For the most part, answers will be well-developed, focused on the questions and there will be a range of points presented. There will be a two-sided response but it may lack range on one side. At the bottom of the band, candidates may provide a narrower range of developed points. At the top of the band, expect a wider range of developed points and clear focus on the question. Band 4 [13–15 marks] Answers in this band will show excellent knowledge and understanding of the debate. There will be a strong grasp of the arguments as well as accurate and frequent use of sociological terms and concepts. Answers will be well-developed, clearly focused on the question and discuss a wide range of points. Responses will be two-sided and have a range of points on each side. At the bottom of the band (13 marks), the answer may lack a specific conclusion. Higher in the band, there will be a clear attempt to offer an assessment of the ‘To what extent.?’ part of the question through a focused conclusion.
3 Despite the relativity of crime and deviance, all societies and their agents of social control attempt to prevent crime from occurring. To control crime effectively societies need to understand why crime happens. Sociologists offer different explanations for criminal behaviour, such as stereotyping and socialisation. Many people also argue that punishments for law-breaking are not preventing crime. (a) What is meant by the term ‘socialisation’? [2] (b) Describe two examples of informal social control. [4] (c) Explain how crime and deviance are relative. [6] (d) Explain why formal agencies of social control can be effective at preventing crime. [8] (e) To what extent does stereotyping affect the crime rate? [15] Section D: Media
35 marks
Mark scheme: 3(a) What is meant by the term ‘socialisation’. 2 One mark for partial definition, e.g. primary and secondary. Two marks for clear definition, e.g. learning the norms and values of your culture. 3(b) Describe two examples of informal social control. 4 Possible answers: • negative sanctions – comments, ridicule, sarcasm and disapproving looks ensure individuals are made to conform to social norms; • positive sanctions/rewards – words of praise, rewards and treats encourage and motivate individuals to conform to social norms; • family – the first informal agency for most/primary agent teaches the basics e.g. through imitation and ensures individuals conform; • education – where social conformity is enforced and norms and values reinforced e.g. through the hidden curriculum; • media – agenda setting determines society’s expected norms and values e.g. gender roles and expectations through representation and stereotyping and encourages individuals to conform; • peer group – of particular importance for young people – use peer pressure to teach and reinforce expectations and social conformity; • religion – of less significance in secular societies but still an important informal agent for many – religious teachings reinforce morals and behaviour and ensure individuals conform; • workplace – an agency people meet later in life which can often re- socialise us into workplace norms and values and expectations that individuals will conform to; • any other reasonable response. One mark for each point correctly identified (up to a maximum of two). One mark for each point that is developed (up to a maximum of two). 3(c) Explain how crime and deviance are relative. 6 Possible answers: • time/era – definitions of crime and deviance are not static they change over time and are thus relative e.g. smoking in public places is now illegal in a lot of countries, previously it was normal to smoke in a public place; • culture – different cultures have different views on acceptable and unacceptable behaviour e.g. being seen alone with a member of the opposite sex may be considered deviant in some cultures but is perfectly acceptable in others; • society/country – what is considered criminal and deviant differs depending upon the country you are in e.g. age restrictions for drinking alcohol or for driving a car are different in different countries; • situation – the situation you are in can often determine whether something is criminal or deviant or not e.g. it is illegal to be naked in public but acceptable when in private; • role/person – the role a person is in may determine whether their actions are criminal/deviant or not e.g. it is perfectly ok for a police officer to physically reprimand another person but this would be classed as assault (i.e. criminal) if done by a stranger; • context – to kill or hurt another person in self-defence or in times of war may be considered acceptable whereas to do so in your place of work or in the classroom would be classed as murder or assault (a criminal act); • any other reasonable response. Band 0 [0 marks] No creditworthy response. Band 1 [1–3 marks] Answers in this band will show only a limited awareness of the question. Responses may be short and un/underdeveloped. At the bottom of the band (1 mark), expect one weak point. Higher in the band (2–3 marks), candidates may offer more than one weak point, but there may be a tendency towards simplistic answers, engaging with sociological ideas without using sociological language. Band 2 [4–6 marks] Answers in this band will have clear and accurate explanation, showing good sociological knowledge and understanding. Sociological terms and concepts should be expected and explained. At the bottom of the band, the range of points covered may be narrow or lack detail. Higher in the band, answers will cover more than one point in a well-developed way or cover several points in less detail. 3(d) Explain why formal agencies of social control can be effective at 8 preventing crime. Possible answers: • police – they can use the power of arrest, stop and search, patrols etc. in order to have a very visible presence that helps to prevent crime; • police – can issue fines and warnings that help to prevent people committing crime; • prisons – loss of freedom and being removed from family and friends is something that most people want to avoid and is therefore a successful way of preventing crime; • prisons – removing criminals off the streets helps to prevent crime as they can no longer commit crimes; • courts – they have the power to sentence individuals and so can prevent crime by imposing restrictions and conditions onto criminals e.g. tagging, curfews, restraining orders etc.; • government – they make the laws and distribute power to the other formal agents to maintain those laws – they therefore determine what is and isn’t criminal and thus can prevent crime; • armed forces – these can be used to take control of situations such as mass protests, riots etc. and can use physical force and weapons to prevent crime; • fear – the formal agents are often feared by the public and so are successful in preventing people from committing crime through this ‘fear factor’ e.g. the death sentence; • severity of consequences –formal agencies of social control can impose serious consequences on individuals for criminal behaviour and thus may prevent people from committing crime; • deterrence – the formal agencies all aim to put people off crime and this is likely to prevent many people from committing it; • any other reasonable response. Band 0 [0 marks] No creditworthy response. Band 1 [1–3 marks] Answers in this band will show only a limited awareness of the question. A tendency to description is likely. Responses may be short and undeveloped and points stated without explanation. Sociological terms and concepts are unlikely to be used. At the bottom of the band (1 mark), expect one weak point. Higher in the band (2–3 marks), candidates may offer more than one weak point. Band 2 [4–6 marks] Answers in this band will show basic sociological knowledge and understanding. Responses may be underdeveloped and lacking in range. At the bottom of the band, candidates are unlikely to use sociological terms and concepts accurately. Higher in the band, candidates may be beginning to use sociological terms and concepts with greater accuracy. However, some aspects of the answer may only be partially developed/explained. 3(d) Band 3 [7–8 marks] Answers in this band will show good sociological knowledge and understanding and will be well-developed and explained. Sociological terms and concepts will be used accurately overall. Answers will be well- focused on the question and there will be a range of points presented. At the top of the band explanations will be clear throughout. 3(e) To what extent does stereotyping affect the crime rate? 15 Arguments for: • gender – males are stereotyped to be more criminal than females therefore are more likely to be stopped, arrested and prosecuted; • gender – chivalry thesis – females are said to be treated more leniently within the criminal justice system and therefore get away with more crime than males; • social class – the formal agencies typically have a perception that it is the lower social classes who commit crime and thus target these areas when looking to prevent crime; • social class – members of the formal agencies are typically drawn from the higher classes and thus believe that it is ‘others’ (lower classes) who commit crime; • ethnicity – institutional racism – has been said to be a factor in policing and the courts that may explain why some ethnic minorities are stereotyped to be criminal; • ethnicity – gangs – many stereotypes, largely from the media, presume that gang crime is an ‘ethnic problem’ and thus it is ethnic minorities who are targeted by the formal agencies; • age – young people are thought to be more criminal than older people due to media representations and moral panics therefore are more likely to be targeted; • age – stop and search – police are more likely to stop and search young people hanging around in groups and thus their chances of arrest and conviction are higher; • categorisation – some types of crime are stereotyped as being committed by certain social groups which will affect arrest and conviction rates e.g. female shoplifters, young ethnic minority gang members, lower class burglars etc.; • Interactionism – Cicourel’s ‘typical delinquent’ – this study proved that there was an image in the minds of those working for the criminal justice system of who the stereotypical criminal was – young, male, working class and ethnic minority – often created by the media; • labelling theory (Becker) – labelling some social groups as ‘criminal’ may lead to a self-fulfilling prophecy as they live up to the stereotype they have been given and become more criminal; • white collar crime – because members of the higher classes are not stereotyped to be criminal they are much more likely to get away with crime; • any other reasonable response. 3(e) Arguments against: • stereotyping does not explain the higher conviction rates for some social groups – these groups do actually commit more crime; • stereotypes change and can be challenged e.g. recent cases of corporate and green crime convictions, female gang members being convicted etc.; • equality campaigns – these are commonplace now throughout the criminal justice system and thus prevent cases of sexism, racism, ageism etc.; • as the members of the criminal justice system become more diverse so incidents of stereotyping affecting the crime rate become fewer; • poverty and deprivation are more likely to affect the crime rate than stereotyping (Marxism); • peer pressure and criminal role modelling are more likely to affect the crime rate than stereotyping; • inadequate socialisation (New Right) is more likely to be a cause of crime than stereotyping; • stereotypes are changing – in Japan, for example, there is a rise in older people committing and being convicted of crime rather than the younger stereotypical criminals; • any other reasonable response. Band 0 [0 marks] No creditworthy response. Band 1 [1–4 marks] Answers in this band may be vague and largely based on common sense showing limited knowledge of the debate. Use of sociological terms or concepts is very unlikely. Responses may be short, undeveloped and one-sided. Lower in the band (1–2 marks), expect one or two weak points. Higher in the band (3–4 marks) candidates may offer more than two points and provide a weak definition of key terms in the question. Band 2 [5–8 marks] In this band candidates will show some basic knowledge of the debate. Alternatively, they may offer an answer which is list-like in nature but there will be no real attempt to assess the issues raised by the question. There may be limited/some use of sociological terms or concepts. Responses may be underdeveloped and lack range. Answers may be simplistic and two-sided or only cover one side of the debate. Lower in the band, the response may be rather narrow in the points covered and there may be some development. Higher in the band, more points are likely to be covered with some development. Alternatively, a list-like answer with some development covering both sides of the argument may score up to 8 marks. A one-sided answer cannot score higher than 8 marks. 3(e) Band 3 [9–12 marks] Answers in this band will show good sociological knowledge and understanding of the debate. Sociological terms and concepts will be used with greater accuracy and/or frequency. For the most part, answers will be well-developed, focused on the questions and there will be a range of points presented. There will be a two-sided response but it may lack range on one side. At the bottom of the band, candidates may provide a narrower range of developed points. At the top of the band, expect a wider range of developed points and clear focus on the question. Band 4 [13–15 marks] Answers in this band will show excellent knowledge and understanding of the debate. There will be a strong grasp of the arguments as well as accurate and frequent use of sociological terms and concepts. Answers will be well-developed, clearly focused on the question and discuss a wide range of points. Responses will be two-sided and have a range of points on each side. At the bottom of the band (13 marks), the answer may lack a specific conclusion. Higher in the band, there will be a clear attempt to offer an assessment of the ‘To what extent.?’ part of the question through a focused conclusion.
4 Public funding is one of the ways the media is funded. The funding and regulation of the media affects media content and representations. Some sociologists believe representations can be stereotypical and damaging to social groups such as the elderly, minority ethnic groups and women. However, globalisation is changing the media. (a) What is meant by the term ‘public funding’? [2] (b) Describe two stereotypical media representations of the elderly. [4] (c) Explain how globalisation has affected the media. [6] (d) Explain why feminists criticise some media content. [8] (e) To what extent is media censorship effective? [15]
35 marks
Mark scheme: 4(a) What is meant by the term ‘public funding’? 2 One mark for partial definition, e.g. the BBC. Two marks for clear definition, e.g. media costs are covered by payments from the government or other public body, often through taxes. 4(b) Describe two stereotypical media representations of the elderly. 4 Possible answers: • invisibility/under-representation – the elderly are noticeably absent from some areas of the media and are thus effectively made invisible e.g. few powerful elderly people seen on TV; • binary oppositions – the elderly are often represented as being the opposite to the young e.g. frail ‘vs’ strong; • a burden – the elderly are often represented as being a burden to others, unable to look after themselves; • vulnerable – the elderly are frequently seen as being frail and vulnerable, as victims or patients, for example; • grumpy – the grumpy old man stereotype is a common representation of elderly males; • unsexual – the elderly are typically represented as not wanting or participating in sexual activity; • unattractive – anti-ageing products dominate the beauty products on sale, conveying the message that to be old is to be unattractive, particularly for women; • wise – in some societies the elderly are considered to be highly intelligent and wise; • respected – in some cultures the elderly are awarded high status and respect from others in society; • any other reasonable response. One mark for each point correctly identified (up to a maximum of two). One mark for each point that is developed (up to a maximum of two). 4(c) Explain how globalisation has affected the media. 6 Possible answers: • communication – this is now instant across the globe meaning unfolding news events can be watched as they happen; • ownership – global media are dominated by a small number of huge conglomerates e.g. Disney; • Westernisation – global media is dominated by the West meaning companies are based in western societies and spread mainly Western culture and ideologies; • audience – increasingly media products are made for global rather than national audiences and thus contain elements that will appeal on a global level (cultural homogeneity); • audience – increasingly audiences all around the world can access the same media through the internet e.g. global streaming services; • local cultural decline – global media means that local cultures may be in decline as western culture becomes the norm – resulting in a loss of local languages, traditions and customs; • non-western media – due to new media this may be able to reach western audiences on a global scale e.g. the rise of Bollywood and Nollywood, K-pop/Korean culture and Japanese anime/culture; • any other reasonable response. Band 0 [0 marks] No creditworthy response. Band 1 [1–3 marks] Answers in this band will show only a limited awareness of the question. Responses may be short and un/underdeveloped. At the bottom of the band (1 mark), expect one weak point. Higher in the band (2–3 marks), candidates may offer more than one weak point, but there may be a tendency towards simplistic answers, engaging with sociological ideas without using sociological language. Band 2 [4–6 marks] Answers in this band will have clear and accurate explanation, showing good sociological knowledge and understanding. Sociological terms and concepts should be expected and explained. At the bottom of the band, the range of points covered may be narrow or lack detail. Higher in the band, answers will cover more than one point in a well-developed way or cover several points in less detail. 4(d) Explain why feminists criticise some media content. 8 Possible answers: • gender stereotyping – feminists are concerned about the amount of this in the media and the effects it may have upon children’s gender identities and future gender roles; • binary opposition – males and females are typically shown to be opposites in the media which narrows the audience’s perceptions of what is normal for a male and a female in society e.g. female housewives, male breadwinners; • hegemonic masculinity – this is shown in the media as the norm for males therefore putting pressure on them to adopt this identity – it can often be sexist and has links to aggression towards women; • power – males are typically shown in powerful roles whilst women are passive/submissive to men – this reinforces patriarchy in society; • range of roles – women are shown in a very narrow range of roles in the media which may limit their aspirations and goals (Meehan); • female under-representation – women are under-represented in most areas of the media e.g. few female main characters or villains – this can affect female identity; • focus on physical appearance of women – the media continues to focus on the physical appearance of women and image manipulation is used to create unachievable and unrealistic representations e.g. on social media – these can be damaging for women in real life and have been linked to eating disorders, mental health etc.; • male gaze (Mulvey) – women continue to be sexualised and objectified in the media and are represented to appeal to men; • any other reasonable response. Band 0 [0 marks] No creditworthy response. Band 1 [1–3 marks] Answers in this band will show only a limited awareness of the question. A tendency to description is likely. Responses may be short and undeveloped and points stated without explanation. Sociological terms and concepts are unlikely to be used. At the bottom of the band (1 mark), expect one weak point. Higher in the band (2–3 marks), candidates may offer more than one weak point. Band 2 [4–6 marks] Answers in this band will show basic sociological knowledge and understanding. Responses may be underdeveloped and lacking in range. At the bottom of the band, candidates are unlikely to use sociological terms and concepts accurately. Higher in the band, candidates may be beginning to use sociological terms and concepts with greater accuracy. However, some aspects of the answer may only be partially developed/explained. Band 3 [7–8 marks] Answers in this band will show good sociological knowledge and understanding and will be well-developed and explained. Sociological terms and concepts will be used accurately overall. Answers will be well- focused on the question and there will be a range of points presented. At the top of the band explanations will be clear throughout. 4(e) To what extent is media censorship effective? 15 Arguments for: • state control – if the state wants to control what is consumed by the audience then censorship is essential e.g. North Korea, China, Nazi Germany, propaganda etc. – this results in a one sided version of events that effectively controls output; • Marxism – if the ruling class are to maintain their powerful positions of privilege in society then censorship is both effective and necessary to prevent any challenges to the dominant ideology and status quo; • laws protecting the state – laws such as The UK Official Secrets Act are crucial to preserve state security and prevent the reporting of state secrets and to effectively protect the country’s security; • obscenity – the audience need to be protected from obscene material and thus censorship is effective at allowing some material and not others; • libel and slander laws – these are necessary to protect individuals from unfounded and unproven allegations by the media and are effective because they legally protect individuals from unfounded allegations; • prejudice and discrimination – laws are in place to prevent the unfair treatment of minority groups in the media showing that censorship is effective at reducing media sexism, racism, ageism etc.; • certification systems – found in the film and the gaming industries are effective in ensuring that only age-appropriate material is seen by specific age groups; • the TV watershed – this is effective in ensuring the suitability of material being viewed for the age of the audience, allowing parents to regulate what children can and can’t watch; • hypodermic syringe model – this shows that censorship is necessary as children will imitate what they see in the media e.g. violence and children/the Bobo doll – censorship is thus effective as it protects us; • any other reasonable response. Arguments against: • pluralism – there is so much choice available in the media today that people can just choose something else to consume if they don’t like the content available to them, showing that censorship is not very effective; • new media – as the media today is global and largely internet-based censorship is no longer effective as alternative media platforms and products exist to challenge and debate media content and output; • diversity – there is today such a diversity of opinions in society that media censorship is no longer effective as there is not an agreed view on what is right and wrong; • postmodernism – information is no longer ‘top down’ meaning the media cannot be used for propaganda or to convey a dominant ideology anymore, therefore media censorship is not effective; • public service – public service broadcasters are obliged to operate with due impartiality thus censorship is not really effective as it is not necessary; 4(e) • parental controls – many argue media censorship is not effective as it depends upon parents and adults upholding its values – not all will do so e.g. parents may let children watch TV shows after the watershed or play games that they are not officially old enough for; • audience selection – this active audience approach suggests that the audience will choose how the media affects and influences them, suggesting that media censorship cannot be effective; • uses and gratifications – this model says that the audience will choose what they use the media for therefore censorship is not effective as the audience, not the media, are in control of interpretations made; • postmodernists believe that media censorship is not effective as with the advent of digital technology the audience are now often also the producers of media content so the media can no longer be controlled; • on-demand and internet services limit the effectiveness of censorship in the media as audiences can consume what they want, when they want with little regulation; • the interactive nature of new media means that regardless of any media censorship, the audience can actively comment, post, blog or vlog about issues, content etc. and this censorship cannot be effective anymore; • any other reasonable response. Band 0 [0 marks] No creditworthy response. Band 1 [1–4 marks] Answers in this band may be vague and largely based on common sense showing limited knowledge of the debate. Use of sociological terms or concepts is very unlikely. Responses may be short, undeveloped and one-sided. Lower in the band (1–2 marks), expect one or two weak points. Higher in the band (3–4 marks) candidates may offer more than two points and provide a weak definition of key terms in the question. Band 2 [5–8 marks] In this band candidates will show some basic knowledge of the debate. Alternatively, they may offer an answer which is list-like in nature but there will be no real attempt to assess the issues raised by the question. There may be limited/some use of sociological terms or concepts. Responses may be underdeveloped and lack range. Answers may be simplistic and two-sided or only cover one side of the debate. Lower in the band, the response may be rather narrow in the points covered and there may be some development. Higher in the band, more points are likely to be covered with some development. Alternatively, a list-like answer with some development covering both sides of the argument may score up to 8 marks. A one-sided answer cannot score higher than 8 marks. 4(e) Band 3 [9–12 marks] Answers in this band will show good sociological knowledge and understanding of the debate. Sociological terms and concepts will be used with greater accuracy and/or frequency. For the most part, answers will be well-developed, focused on the questions and there will be a range of points presented. There will be a two-sided response but it may lack range on one side. At the bottom of the band, candidates may provide a narrower range of developed points. At the top of the band, expect a wider range of developed points and clear focus on the question. Band 4 [13–15 marks] Answers in this band will show excellent knowledge and understanding of the debate. There will be a strong grasp of the arguments as well as accurate and frequent use of sociological terms and concepts. Answers will be well-developed, clearly focused on the question and discuss a wide range of points. Responses will be two-sided and have a range of points on each side. At the bottom of the band (13 marks), the answer may lack a specific conclusion. Higher in the band, there will be a clear attempt to offer an assessment of the ‘To what extent.?’ part of the question through a focused conclusion.
2 Some sociologists argue that education benefits both the individual and society. Most education takes place in schools where both sanctions and rewards are used by teachers to control students. Teachers discourage students from using ‘restricted code’. Students who use ‘restricted code’ can sometimes be negatively labelled in schools. Labelling by teachers may influence the educational achievement of students but it is not the only factor. (a) What is meant by the term ‘restricted code’? [2] (b) Describe two ways schools use rewards to motivate students. [4] (c) Explain how labelling by teachers can affect student achievement in schools. [6] (d) Explain why examination results in private schools are often better than in state schools. [8] (e) To what extent is education functional for the individual and society? [15] Section C: Crime, deviance and social control
35 marks
Mark scheme: 2(a) What is meant by the term ‘restricted code’? 2 One mark for partial definition, e.g. informal language. Two marks for clear definition, e.g. informal language used with family and friends, often contains slang words. 2(b) Describe two ways schools use rewards to motivate students. 4 Possible answers: • praise – teachers positive comments encourage students to keep on working hard; • achievement points – this kind of system of rewards introduces a competitive element in order to further motivate students; • contact home – positive contact with home can result in praise and gifts for doing well, so encouraging the student to keep working hard; • treat trips – being allowed to take part in visits, trips etc. are often dependent upon behaviour hence encouraging students to do well; • privileges – certain privileges may be given to students who are doing well e.g. positions of responsibility e.g. head-boy/girl, uniform amendments, extended free time – this all motivates students to do well; • peer mentors and role models – seeing other students doing well and being rewarded for their efforts can motivate other students to want to do the same; • scholarships – these can be awarded to reward students for their efforts and to encourage them to continue working hard e.g. sports; • any other reasonable response. One mark for each point correctly identified (up to a maximum of two). One mark for each point that is developed (up to a maximum of two). 2(c) Explain how labelling by teachers can affect student achievement in 6 schools. Possible answers: • gender – teachers may believe that bad behaviour and poor study habits are normal for boys and so label boys in this negative way, thus lowering their achievements; • gender – girls are typically more quiet and less visible in the classroom and therefore can be labelled positively by teachers which will benefit their achievement; • ethnicity – teachers may assume that students from some minority ethnic groups are unable to do well or label them as ‘troublesome’ therefore negatively impacting upon their achievement; • ethnicity – teachers may believe certain ethnic groups to be ‘bright’ or ‘well behaved’ and so treat them in this way, thus positively affecting their achievements; • social class – Becker says teachers judge pupils on non-academic factors such as speech and dress when deciding their ability – this can negatively affect the working class pupils and positively affect those in the higher classes; • self-fulfilling prophecy – if students accept the teacher labels they will start to behave in the way expected of them which will affect their achievement in schools (Rosenthal and Jacobson); • halo effect – if students are constantly told they are ‘bright, intelligent’ etc. and start to internalise this then this can positively affect student outcomes and achievement; • ideal pupil stereotype – Becker says teachers have a stereotype of the ideal pupil against which all students are judged – this can then affect the student’s achievements through, for example, setting and streaming; • self-negating prophecy – students may choose to reject the teacher label given to them and this can also affect achievement; • any other reasonable response. Band 0 [0 marks] No creditworthy response. Band 1 [1–3 marks] Answers in this band will show only a limited awareness of the question. Responses may be short and un/underdeveloped. At the bottom of the band (1 mark), expect one weak point. Higher in the band (2–3 marks), candidates may offer more than one weak point, but there may be a tendency towards simplistic answers, engaging with sociological ideas without using sociological language. Band 2 [4–6 marks] Answers in this band will have clear and accurate explanation, showing good sociological knowledge and understanding. Sociological terms and concepts should be expected and explained. At the bottom of the band, the range of points covered may be narrow or lack detail. Higher in the band, answers will cover more than one point in a well-developed way or cover several points in less detail. 2(d) Explain why examination results in private schools are often better 8 than in state schools. Possible answers: • class sizes – in private schools class sizes tend to be much smaller than in the state system, allowing for more one-to-one attention for pupils and so better examination results; • facilities and resources – private schools typically have better facilities and resources for students than state schools; this will aid student performance in examinations and thus improve their results e.g. ICT, libraries, support staff, textbooks etc.; • quality of teaching – some argue that the quality of teaching is better in the private than the state sector, teachers are more invested in education in private schools, higher staff turnover in the state sector etc.; these factors explain why examination results are better in private schools; • academic ethos – private schools are funded by parents (state schools by the Government) and thus there is more pressure to achieve highly in exams in the private sector; the focus on school work, doing well and going to University is more than in the state sector; • peer pressure – in private schools peer pressure can often be focused upon success and doing well, whereas in state schools there may be pressure to mess around and be the ‘class clown’; • deprivation – state school students are more likely to come from a deprived home life where there may be issues to do with poor diet, lack of quiet study space etc. – the opposite is true for private school students who may have privileged backgrounds. This will affect examination results; • parental aspirations – students in private schools are more likely than state pupils to have successful parents who value education and therefore push and expect their children to do well, hence explaining the difference in examination results; • language barriers – students who do not speak the main language of the school and the examinations are more likely to be found in the state than the private sector and this will cause difficulties for them in terms of examination success, meaning that overall results in private schools are better (elaborated/restricted code); • cultural capital – students in private schools typically come from a privileged background where cultural trips (e.g. opera, theatre, art galleries, libraries etc.) are normal – this will give them an advantage when it comes to school and examinations; • any other reasonable response. 2(d) Band 0 [0 marks] No creditworthy response. Band 1 [1–3 marks] Answers in this band will show only a limited awareness of the question. A tendency to description is likely. Responses may be short and undeveloped and points stated without explanation. Sociological terms and concepts are unlikely to be used. At the bottom of the band (1 mark), expect one weak point. Higher in the band (2–3 marks), candidates may offer more than one weak point. Band 2 [4–6 marks] Answers in this band will show basic sociological knowledge and understanding. Responses may be underdeveloped and lacking in range. At the bottom of the band, candidates are unlikely to use sociological terms and concepts accurately. Higher in the band, candidates may be beginning to use sociological terms and concepts with greater accuracy. However, some aspects of the answer may only be partially developed/explained. Band 3 [7–8 marks] Answers in this band will show good sociological knowledge and understanding and will be well-developed and explained. Sociological terms and concepts will be used accurately overall. Answers will be well- focused on the question and there will be a range of points presented. At the top of the band explanations will be clear throughout. 2(e) To what extent is education functional for the individual and 15 society? Arguments for: • socialisation – schools pass on norms and values from one generation to the next, continuing the process of socialisation that begins in the family; • social control – through a process of rewards and sanctions students are effectively controlled in order that they know what is right and what is wrong; • sense of belonging – students are socialised into a set of shared values which helps them to feel they have a place in society e.g. singing the national anthem; • skills and knowledge – education teaches these vital things to students in order that they can be successful in society; • sifting and sorting – education ensures the appropriate allocation of roles for future life based on a student’s performance in school; • meritocracy – functionalists believe that education is a fair system – if you work hard you will be rewarded and that this is the same in society – achieved status; • Marxism – Marxists believe that education is functional for the higher classes as it indoctrinates capitalist ideologies into the pupils and so creates a submissive future workforce who will accept authority; • feminism – feminists believe that education is functional for men as it allows them to dominate and maintain the patriarchy; • any other reasonable response. Arguments against: • no shared values – many sociologists believe that in the diverse societies of today there are no sets of shared values for education to pass on to students – Marxists believe it is capitalist values, feminists patriarchal ones that are transmitted; • education and work – there is not necessarily a connection between school and the workplace, employers are frequently critical that school leavers are not prepared for the workplace and school leavers rarely use much of what they learnt at school in wider society; • selection – many sociologists believe that people are selected for jobs not on their ability but more based on their social class, gender and/or ethnicity; • hidden curriculum – many sociologists believe that students take part in a hidden curriculum in schools that is not functional as it can be based on prejudice, stereotypes and discrimination that is then replicated in wider society; • ethnocentric curriculum – ethnic minorities may not feel part of a school system that hides and distorts their own culture – this is not functional for those students; • private schools – because some families can afford to pay for their children’s education the system cannot be functional for all as it based on inherent inequalities that are then repeated in society; • subject choice – feminists believe that education is not functional as boys and girls still typically choose different subjects at school that are based on gender stereotypes – this reinforces patriarchy and gender inequalities in careers and pay; 2(e) • teacher labelling – teachers are likely to have different expectations of different students based on stereotypical judgements e.g. boys may be pushed more than girls as it is presumed that they will occupy the breadwinner role – this isn’t functional; • gender and ethnic role models – education is typically dominated by white males which gives the impression to students that it is they who occupy positions of power in society, this isn’t functional for all; • any other reasonable response. Band 0 [0 marks] No creditworthy response. Band 1 [1–4 marks] Answers in this band may be vague and largely based on common sense showing limited knowledge of the debate. Use of sociological terms or concepts is very unlikely. Responses may be short, undeveloped and one-sided. Lower in the band (1–2 marks), expect one or two weak points. Higher in the band (3–4 marks) candidates may offer more than two points and provide a weak definition of key terms in the question. Band 2 [5–8 marks] In this band candidates will show some basic knowledge of the debate. Alternatively, they may offer an answer which is list-like in nature but there will be no real attempt to assess the issues raised by the question. There may be limited/some use of sociological terms or concepts. Responses may be underdeveloped and lack range. Answers may be simplistic and two-sided or only cover one side of the debate. Lower in the band, the response may be rather narrow in the points covered and there may be some development. Higher in the band, more points are likely to be covered with some development. Alternatively, a list-like answer with some development covering both sides of the argument may score up to 8 marks. A one-sided answer cannot score higher than 8 marks. Band 3 [9–12 marks] Answers in this band will show good sociological knowledge and understanding of the debate. Sociological terms and concepts will be used with greater accuracy and/or frequency. For the most part, answers will be well-developed, focused on the questions and there will be a range of points presented. There will be a two-sided response but it may lack range on one side. At the bottom of the band, candidates may provide a narrower range of developed points. At the top of the band, expect a wider range of developed points and clear focus on the question. Band 4 [13–15 marks] Answers in this band will show excellent knowledge and understanding of the debate. There will be a strong grasp of the arguments as well as accurate and frequent use of sociological terms and concepts. Answers will be well-developed, clearly focused on the question and discuss a wide range of points. Responses will be two-sided and have a range of points on each side. At the bottom of the band (13 marks), the answer 2(e) may lack a specific conclusion. Higher in the band, there will be a clear attempt to offer an assessment of the ‘To what extent.?’ part of the question through a focused conclusion.
3 Some social groups are more likely than others to feature in the official crime statistics such as, the young, the working class and males. These social groups are also over-represented in the penal system and can be the focus of a moral panic. However, some sociologists are critical of the accuracy of the official measurements of crime, as many crimes are under-reported to the police. (a) What is meant by the term ‘penal system’? [2] (b) Describe two types of crimes that are under-reported to the police. [4] (c) Explain how moral panics are created. [6] (d) Explain why juvenile delinquency occurs. [8] (e) To what extent is social class the best explanation of crime? [15] Section D: Media
35 marks
Mark scheme: 3(a) What is meant by the term ‘penal system’? 2 One mark for partial definition, e.g. prison. Two marks for clear definition, e.g. the formal agencies responsible for overseeing the punishment that has been imposed on an offender by the court. 3(b) Describe two types of crimes that are under-reported to the police. 4 Possible answers: • trivial crimes – crimes perceived to be petty or everyday occurrences are unlikely to be reported as it’s not worthwhile; • uninsured items – crimes where there is no benefit to the victim in reporting it are unlikely to be reported; • domestic abuse – some crimes are perceived as a private matter and therefore are unlikely to be reported; • family/friendship ties – crimes where the offender is known to the victim are unlikely to be reported; • gang crimes – some crimes will not be reported because the victim will be concerned for their safety – the fear of reprisal; • victimless crimes – drug abuse is unlikely to be reported as there is no clear victim of a crime; • invisible crimes e.g. fraud – in many white-collar crimes people are not aware they have been a victim therefore do not report it; • corporate crimes – big businesses often dismiss staff and deal with matters internally rather than involving the police so as not to damage their reputations; • any other reasonable response. One mark for each point correctly identified (up to a maximum of two). One mark for each point that is developed (up to a maximum of two). 3(c) Explain how moral panics are created. 6 Possible answers: • exaggeration – the behaviour of the group identified by the media is reported as worse than it really is through sensationalist language and images so creating a moral panic (e.g. Cohen’s ‘Mods and Rockers’ study); • further deviance occurs – as a result of the moral panic deviancy amplification may occur through social reactions (e.g. Young’s ‘The Drugtakers’ – a good study to show how the media can create deviancy amplification and folk devils through the creation of a moral panic); • prediction – the media claim that further deviance will occur and will be worse unless firm action is taken and so create a moral panic; • symbolisation – the media show how the folk devils (those identified as the ‘baddies’) can be recognised e.g. by their appearance, clothing etc. and this stereotype then becomes part of the moral panic; • pressure – the media can put pressure on other agencies e.g. the Government, schools and parents to control the deviant behaviour showcased in the moral panic – this is a key feature of how it is created; • stigmatisation – the folk devils in a moral panic are shown to be very different to ‘us’ – this is a negative representation often based on easily recognised stereotypes and part of how a moral panic is created; • crime/deviancy occurs – something happens in society that occurs more than once and offends society’s morals and values, e.g. urban knife crime; this is then taken by the media and turned into a negative story and a moral panic; • Fawbert’s study on ‘the hoodies’ could be used to illustrate the role of stereotyping and labelling in the creation of a moral panic; • any other reasonable response. Band 0 [0 marks] No creditworthy response. Band 1 [1–3 marks] Answers in this band will show only a limited awareness of the question. Responses may be short and un/underdeveloped. At the bottom of the band (1 mark), expect one weak point. Higher in the band (2–3 marks), candidates may offer more than one weak point, but there may be a tendency towards simplistic answers, engaging with sociological ideas without using sociological language. Band 2 [4–6 marks] Answers in this band will have clear and accurate explanation, showing good sociological knowledge and understanding. Sociological terms and concepts should be expected and explained. At the bottom of the band, the range of points covered may be narrow or lack detail. Higher in the band, answers will cover more than one point in a well-developed way or cover several points in less detail. 3(d) Explain why juvenile delinquency occurs. 8 Possible answers: • peer pressure – young people are thought to be under a lot of pressure to conform to peer group norms – if these involve criminality then this will lead to juvenile delinquency; • gangs – young people make up the vast majority of gang members – gangs are based on criminal and deviant behaviour e.g. drug dealing, initiation rites etc; • postmodernism – thrills and excitement – many sociologists believe that young people commit crime because it gives them a ‘buzz’ and is exciting; • edgework – young people are more likely to take risks than older people who will have more to lose e.g. work, family etc. – this can often result in juvenile delinquency; • Matza ‘drift’ – he believes that it is normal for young people to engage in criminal and deviant behaviour as it is part of their adolescent life stage, a deviant phase; • functionalism – extended period of youth – juvenile delinquency is seen to be ‘part of growing up’ when adolescents are searching for their identity (not yet an adult, no longer a child) – transition stage; • imitation and role models – young people are more likely to be influenced by the actions of others than the older generation therefore media representations of ‘gangsta’s’ and criminality as glamorous may affect the younger generation; • Marxism – juvenile delinquency occurs as a form of resistance to the inequalities of capitalism e.g. protest groups, activism, sub-cultures; • boys are more likely to offend than girls – this may be due to pressures to appear masculine by being aggressive and competitive which can lead to criminality e.g. joining deviant sub-cultures; • advertising/consumer culture – young people are subjected to a constant stream of adverts for consumer items and lifestyles that they are unlikely to be able to afford; this may be another reason for them to turn to juvenile delinquency; • lack of education – poverty/material deprivation may ensue for young people who are unable to find a job/high paying job; • discrimination – juvenile delinquency can occur due to societal discrimination e.g. of ethnic minority youths who then feel anger towards an unfair society e.g. BLM; • in-school deviance – students may join anti-school sub-cultures and engage in deviant behaviour due to being labelled unfairly by teachers, resulting in a self-fulfilling prophecy and a deviant master status; • any other reasonable response. 3(d) Band 0 [0 marks] No creditworthy response. Band 1 [1–3 marks] Answers in this band will show only a limited awareness of the question. A tendency to description is likely. Responses may be short and undeveloped and points stated without explanation. Sociological terms and concepts are unlikely to be used. At the bottom of the band (1 mark), expect one weak point. Higher in the band (2–3 marks), candidates may offer more than one weak point. Band 2 [4–6 marks] Answers in this band will show basic sociological knowledge and understanding. Responses may be underdeveloped and lacking in range. At the bottom of the band, candidates are unlikely to use sociological terms and concepts accurately. Higher in the band, candidates may be beginning to use sociological terms and concepts with greater accuracy. However, some aspects of the answer may only be partially developed/explained. Band 3 [7–8 marks] Answers in this band will show good sociological knowledge and understanding and will be well-developed and explained. Sociological terms and concepts will be used accurately overall. Answers will be well- focused on the question and there will be a range of points presented. At the top of the band explanations will be clear throughout. 3(e) To what extent is social class the best explanation of crime? 15 Arguments for: • official crime statistics show that most crimes are committed by members of the working/under class, therefore social class must be an explanation for why crime is committed; • socialisation – the lower classes may have been socialised into a different set of values than the higher classes e.g. immediate gratification – this may lead them into crime (Miller focal concerns); • Merton’s strain theory – Western societies socialise individuals to believe in the American Dream but in reality these levels of success are not available to everyone and are harder to achieve for the lower social classes, who may then turn to crime in order to gain the things they desire; • relative deprivation – members of the lower classes may be more likely to steal goods that they see the higher classes enjoying but that they cannot afford legitimately, thus leading to crime; • Marxism – some actions of the lower classes are criminalised and the law is selectively enforced so that the powerful are less likely to have their actions defined as criminal. This makes it seem as though being from a lower social class is part of the explanation for crime; • Cohen status frustration – the lower social classes are likely to have a low status in society and thus may turn to crime in order to improve this through illegitimate means e.g. gangs; • Cicourel ‘typical delinquent’ – his study showed that the law enforcement agencies have a stereotype of who the typical criminal is and that being working class is part of this – this means those in the working class are more likely to be stopped and searched and arrested than other classes; • education – the lower classes are less likely to have a good education which then impedes upon their job prospects, perhaps making crime an attractive ‘career choice’ where rewards can be high (illegitimate opportunity structure); • white-collar/corporate crime – these types of crime demonstrate links between crime and the higher social classes through the workplace; • any other reasonable response. Arguments against: • age – young people commit a lot more crime than other age groups, therefore maybe it is age that is the best explanation; • gender – males commit a lot more crime than females, therefore maybe it is gender (masculinity) that is the best explanation; • ethnicity – some ethnic groups commit more crimes than others, therefore perhaps it is ethnicity that is the best explanation; • OCS validity – sociologists recognise that the official crime statistics do not give us a true picture of crime therefore the assumption that crime is committed largely by the lower classes (based on OCS data) could be misplaced; • dark figure of crime – a significant number of crimes never feature in the OCS and therefore any trends in criminality (e.g. that crime is committed mainly by the lower class) should be treated with caution; • is the criminal’s social class position really the best explanation for middle class crimes such as fraud or is it more to do with greed?; 3(e) • expressive crimes – it is difficult to align social class with sensible explanations for expressive crimes such as murder and assault; • feminism – feminists believe that the criminal justice system is patriarchal and that men are the problem when it comes to crime – low rates of conviction for sexual assault, rape, domestic violence against women etc; this all leads them to believe that the best explanation for crime is not class based, but gender; • any other reasonable response. Band 0 [0 marks] No creditworthy response. Band 1 [1–4 marks] Answers in this band may be vague and largely based on common sense showing limited knowledge of the debate. Use of sociological terms or concepts is very unlikely. Responses may be short, undeveloped and one-sided. Lower in the band (1–2 marks), expect one or two weak points. Higher in the band (3–4 marks) candidates may offer more than two points and provide a weak definition of key terms in the question. Band 2 [5–8 marks] In this band candidates will show some basic knowledge of the debate. Alternatively, they may offer an answer which is list-like in nature but there will be no real attempt to assess the issues raised by the question. There may be limited/some use of sociological terms or concepts. Responses may be underdeveloped and lack range. Answers may be simplistic and two-sided or only cover one side of the debate. Lower in the band, the response may be rather narrow in the points covered and there may be some development. Higher in the band, more points are likely to be covered with some development. Alternatively, a list-like answer with some development covering both sides of the argument may score up to 8 marks. A one-sided answer cannot score higher than 8 marks. Band 3 [9–12 marks] Answers in this band will show good sociological knowledge and understanding of the debate. Sociological terms and concepts will be used with greater accuracy and/or frequency. For the most part, answers will be well-developed, focused on the questions and there will be a range of points presented. There will be a two-sided response but it may lack range on one side. At the bottom of the band, candidates may provide a narrower range of developed points. At the top of the band, expect a wider range of developed points and clear focus on the question. Band 4 [13–15 marks] Answers in this band will show excellent knowledge and understanding of the debate. There will be a strong grasp of the arguments as well as accurate and frequent use of sociological terms and concepts. Answers will be well-developed, clearly focused on the question and discuss a wide range of points. Responses will be two-sided and have a range of points on each side. At the bottom of the band (13 marks), the answer 3(e) may lack a specific conclusion. Higher in the band, there will be a clear attempt to offer an assessment of the ‘To what extent.?’ part of the question through a focused conclusion.
3 According to the official crime statistics, some social groups are more likely than others to be convicted of crime. Some sociologists question how effective punishments actually are at deterring people from committing crime. This is particularly true of young people who are part of youth culture. (a) What is meant by the term ‘youth culture’? [2] (b) Describe two reasons why someone might not report a crime to the police. [4] (c) Explain how self-report studies can be used to measure crime. [6] (d) Explain why some ethnic minority groups have higher official rates of crime than other ethnic groups. [8] (e) To what extent do punishments for committing crimes deter people from criminal behaviour? [15] Section D: Media
35 marks
Mark scheme: 3(a) What is meant by the term ‘youth culture’? 2 The way of life (norms and values) of young people between childhood and adulthood. One mark for partial definition, e.g. way of life. Two marks for clear definition, e.g. norms and values associated with young people. 3(b) Describe two reasons why someone might not report a crime to the 4 police. Possible answers: • embarrassment e.g. sexual crimes; • crime not perceived as criminal e.g. relating to health and safety legislation; • petty crimes – seen to be a waste of time, nothing will be done; • not aware a crime has been committed e.g. child neglect – the young person does not know that they have been a victim of crime • not able to report a crime e.g. small children that are victims; • fear of reprisals e.g. being scared of the criminal; • knowing the perpetrator and not wanting to get them into trouble e.g. crimes committed by family members/friends; • new crimes such as those to do with technology and the internet e.g. cybercrimes are so commonplace that they are just accepted as ‘normal’; • feeling you will not be listened to e.g. corrupt/untrustworthy police force; • acceptance of crime e.g. gang crime/criminal subcultures – where criminal behaviour is a normal part of everyday life; • crimes the victim is unaware of e.g. they think they have lost something; • any other reasonable response. One mark for each point correctly identified (up to a maximum of two). One mark for each point that is developed (up to a maximum of two). 3(c) Explain how self-report studies can be used to measure crime. 6 Possible answers: • asks people what crimes they have committed and can draw patterns and trends from this; • completed anonymously in order to improve validity; • thought to be more valid than the official crime statistics as respondents do not have to worry about getting into trouble; • confidential questionnaires or interviews are used as the research method; • different methodologies – depending on the type of method used (e.g. questionnaires or interviews) researchers can find out qualitative and/or quantitative data in order to measure crime; • can reveal that significant numbers of crimes are committed by women and middle class people – a stark contrast to the official crime statistics; • often used to find out about the offending of young people; • any other reasonable response. Band 0 [0 marks] No creditworthy response. Band 1 [1–3 marks] Answers in this band will show only a limited awareness of how self-report studies can be used to measure crime. Responses may be short and un/under developed. Candidates may be confused as to what is meant by self-report studies. At the bottom of the band (1 mark), expect one weak point. Higher in the band (2–3 marks), candidates may offer more than one weak point, but there may be a tendency towards simplistic answers, engaging with sociological ideas without using sociological language, e.g. ‘asking people what crimes they have committed’. Band 2 [4–6 marks] A clear and accurate explanation showing good sociological knowledge and understanding of how self-report studies can be used to measure crime. Sociological terms and concepts should be expected. Candidates may refer to methodology, purpose, advantages etc. with examples. At the bottom of the band, the range of points covered may be narrow or lack detail. Higher in the band, answers will cover more than one factor in a well-developed way or cover several factors in less detail. 3(d) Explain why some ethnic minority groups have higher official rates of 8 crime than other ethnic groups. Possible answers: • media stereotyping and moral panics; • police labelling and stereotyping leading to police targeting of ethnic minorities – differential stop and search rates, for example; • status frustration – ethnic minorities often have little status in mainstream society and so turn to crime and deviance to gain this illegitimately; • poverty/material deprivation – ethnic minorities are typically amongst the poorest groups in society; • resistance and rebellion – ethnic minorities may be resisting a perceived racist society that leaves them feeling marginalised e.g. BLM and protest groups; • gang culture – ethnic minorities may be more likely than other ethnic groups to be members of gangs and thus to commit criminal offences; • unemployment/lack of legitimate opportunity – ethnic minorities may find it harder to get work and thus turn to crime for the money they need (institutional racism); • any other reasonable response. Band 0 [0 marks] No creditworthy response. Band 1 [1–3 marks] Answers in this band will show only a limited awareness of why the official rates of offending for some ethnic minority groups are much higher than for other ethnic groups. Candidates may not fully understand what is meant by an ethnic minority. Responses may be short and undeveloped. e.g. ‘because the police think they are criminals’. Sociological terms and concepts are unlikely to be used. At the bottom of the band (1 mark), expect one weak point. Higher in the band (2–3 marks), candidates may offer more than one weak point. Band 2 [4–6 marks] Answers in this band will show basic sociological knowledge and understanding of why the official rates of offending for some ethnic minority groups are much higher than for other ethnic groups. Candidates may say that e.g. ‘racism in society may be one reason for the higher rates of offending amongst ethnic minorities. If they struggle to find employment and are living in relative deprivation then criminal behaviour becomes more likely’. Responses may be underdeveloped and lacking in range. At the bottom of the band, candidates are unlikely to use sociological terms and concepts accurately. Higher in the band, candidates may be beginning to use sociological terms and concepts with greater accuracy. However, some aspects of the answer may only be partially developed. 3(d) Band 3 [7–8 marks] Answers in this band will show good sociological knowledge and understanding of why the official rates of offending for some ethnic minority groups are much higher than for other ethnic groups and will be well developed and explained. Candidates may discuss institutional racism, marginalisation, police targeting, labelling theory, moral panics etc. Sociological terms and concepts will be used accurately, overall. Answers will be well focused on the question and there will be a range of reasons presented. At the top of the band explanations will be clear throughout. 3(e) To what extent do punishments for committing crimes deter people 15 from criminal behaviour? Arguments for: • prisons/the penal system are shown in the media to be violent and oppressive places and thus the fear of being sent there puts people off committing crime; • the loss of freedom and autonomy associated with prison life deters people from committing crime as they do not want to be sent there; • the death penalty is seen by many to be the ultimate deterrent to crime; • curfews, electronic tags and restraining orders limit the movement and free will of individuals and thus persuade others not to commit crime; • corporal punishment and other physical punishments deter others from committing crime because of the pain involved; • community service can be seen to be humiliating and embarrassing and so is an effective way of deterring others from committing crime; • the media can be used as important agent of social control, showing the negative sides of punishment and reaching a huge audience – deterring them from committing crime; • family – some individuals may be scared of punishments in the family and so refrain from criminal behaviour; • any other reasonable response. Arguments against: • if punishments for crime were such an effective deterrent then we would not see high levels of offending in societies; • rewards/encouragement/positive sanctions may be a more effective means of deterrence than punishments; • many countries/states that still have the death penalty find that crime rates actually increase showing that this form of punishment does not deter people from committing crime; • the media often glamourise crime and punishment and provide the public with criminal role models – this may actually encourage crime rather than act as a deterrent; • zero tolerance/harsh punishments may aggravate and anger people and thus fail to act as a deterrent but instead lead to greater criminality; • if punishments are perceived to be unfair (i.e. racist/sexist/favour the rich etc.) then they will not deter people from committing crime; • the media is often accused of portraying prison life as ‘soft’ and ‘easy’ – televisions, pool tables, games consoles etc. – and thus this form of punishment is unlikely to act as a deterrent to crime; • lack of alternatives to crime – for some individuals poverty and deprivation may be so bad that no amount of punishment will deter them from crime – it’s a necessity; • any other reasonable response. 3(e) Band 0 [0 marks] No creditworthy response. Band 1 [1–4 marks] Answers in this band may be vague and largely based on common sense showing limited knowledge of whether punishments for committing crimes deter others from criminal behaviour. Use of sociological terms or concepts is very unlikely. Responses may be short, undeveloped and one-sided. e.g. punishments for crime scare other people from doing them. Lower in the band (1–2 marks), expect one or two weak points. Higher in the band (3–4 marks) candidates may offer more than two points or provide a weak definition of key terms, e.g. punishments are how society sanctions people who have committed crimes, in the question. Band 2 [5–8 marks] In this band candidates will show some basic knowledge of whether punishments for committing crimes deter others from criminal behaviour. Alternatively, they may offer an answer which is list-like in nature but there will be no real attempt to assess the issues raised by the question. There may be limited use of sociological terms or concepts. Candidates may discuss some reasons why punishments deter others from committing crimes i.e. fear, loss of freedom, humiliation etc. but responses may be underdeveloped and lack range. Answers may be simplistic and two-sided responses are unlikely. Lower in the band, the response will be rather narrow in the points covered and there will be little development. Higher in the band, more points will be covered and there will be limited development of some points. Alternatively, a list-like answer with little development covering both sides of the argument may score up to 8 marks. A one-sided answer cannot score higher than 8 marks. Band 3 [9–12 marks] Answers in this band will show good sociological knowledge and understanding of whether punishments for committing crimes deter others from criminal behaviour. Sociological terms and concepts will be used with greater accuracy and/or frequency. For the most part, answers will be well developed, focused on the question and there will be a range of points presented. Candidates may be able to present a range of points to support the idea that punishments for committing crimes do deter others, but also be aware of some of the arguments against this i.e. criminal role models, increased crime rates, media distortion and exaggeration etc. There will be a two-sided response but this may be unbalanced. At the bottom of the band, candidates may provide a narrower range of well-developed points. At the top of the band, expect a wider range of points and clear focus on the question. 3(e) Band 4 [13–15 marks] Answers in this band will show excellent knowledge and understanding of whether punishments for committing crimes deter others from criminal behaviour. There will be a strong grasp of the argument as well as accurate and frequent use of sociological terms and concepts. Answers will be well developed, clearly focused on the question and discuss a wide range of points. For example, candidates may say that whether punishments deter others from committing crime depends on the punishment and the individual. For example, marginalised groups in society may perceive punishments as unjust (i.e. racist policing) and thus not be deterred to commit criminal acts and protest. Others, however, may be scared at the thought of prison and the associated loss of freedom this will bring and so be successfully put off committing crimes etc. Responses will be two-sided and balanced. At the bottom of the band (13 marks), the answer may lack a specific conclusion. Higher in the band, there will be a clear attempt to offer an assessment of the ‘To what extent…?’ part of the question through a focused conclusion. Candidates should show consideration of points for and against the idea of whether punishments for committing crimes deter others from criminal behaviour, citing some of the examples given.
4 As an increasingly important agency of socialisation, the media has a lot of power in society. The media has been accused of stereotyping, agenda setting and promoting violence. In new media, however, interactivity means that the audience can also affect media content. (a) What is meant by the term ‘agenda setting’? [2] (b) Describe two examples of interactivity in the media today. [4] (c) Explain how the media serves the interests of powerful people in society according to the Marxist perspective. [6] (d) Explain why violence in the media may not always increase levels of violence in society. [8] (e) To what extent does the media continue to reinforce gender stereotyping? [15]
35 marks
Mark scheme: 4(a) What is meant by the term ‘agenda setting’? 2 The ability of the media to make some topics important. One mark for partial definition, e.g. what’s seen/heard in the media. Two marks for clear definition, e.g. the process in which the media selects which stories to report and bring to the public’s attention. 4(b) Describe two examples of interactivity in the media today. 4 Possible answers: • personalised media content i.e. notifications or email alerts, music playlists etc; • the audience can create their own media i.e. uploading videos and photos or writing a blog (prosumers); • audience members contribute to online chats, comments and discussion forums; • global online gaming and role playing; • audience change/influence the content of the media i.e. voting for/against contestants/game shows etc; • citizen journalism – members of the public are using digital technology to contribute to what we see as news; • any other reasonable response. One mark for each point correctly identified (up to a maximum of two). One mark for each point developed (up to a maximum of two). 4(c) Explain how the media serves the interests of powerful people in 6 society according to the Marxist perspective. Possible answers: • through exaggerated, selective and distorted media reporting that can be used to give a biased viewpoint that favours the ruling class; • the media convey the dominant ideology and values and so keep people in a state of false consciousness; • the media are owned and controlled by the capitalist class who use the media to maintain their own power and prevent social change and discontentment in the masses; • scapegoating – certain groups are blamed in the media by the ruling class for social problems and so become seen as folk devils – these are typically those with less power in society i.e. the working class, ethnic minorities etc; • the media help capitalism through the advertising industry by creating false needs and making the audience into passive consumers who will work hard for the ruling class in order to buy the products they think they need; • the media divert attention from the important issues in society, feeding the audience with gossip and trivia instead and ridiculing or ignoring radial and alternative ideas; • the ruling class protect their powerful positions through controlling people’s thoughts and beliefs – the media presents a picture that justifies the way things are, the status quo, and persuades people that alternatives are not possible or necessary; • any other reasonable response. Band 0 [0 marks] No creditworthy response. Band 1 [1–3 marks] Answers in this band will show only a limited awareness of how the media serves the needs of the powerful people in society. Responses may be short and un/under developed. At the bottom of the band (1 mark), expect one weak point e.g. shows a biased viewpoint. Higher in the band (2–3 marks), candidates may offer more than one weak point, but there may be a tendency towards simplistic answers, engaging with sociological ideas without using sociological language, e.g. ‘the media is owned and produced by people in the higher social classes.’ Band 2 [4–6 marks] A clear and accurate explanation showing good sociological knowledge and understanding of how the media serves the needs of the powerful people in society. For example, discussing how selective reporting can lead the audience to believe in a common world view that benefits the capitalist class by presenting inequalities as necessary and inevitable. Sociological language and concepts should be expected. At the bottom of the band, the range of points covered may be narrow or lack detail. Higher in the band, answers will cover more than one factor in a well-developed way or cover several factors in less detail. 4(d) Explain why violence in the media may not always increase levels of 8 violence in society. Possible answers: • media violence may be cathartic for the audience i.e. by releasing aggressive impulses through playing violent computer games which does not involve real violence; • the shock effect of seeing violence in the media can cause people to take action against real life violence e.g. public safety campaigns (sensitisation); • much media violence is recognised as being fictional by the audience and thus does not lead to increased levels of violence in society; • violence in the media does not affect everyone in the same way and therefore to link it with increased levels of violence in society is a very generalised statement; • it is difficult to accurately pinpoint the media as a reason for increased levels of violence in society – peers, family, education etc. may all have a role to play; • adults may have a filter to understand the difference between fictional and non-fictional violence; • research, such as Bandura et al, that claims to show a link between media violence and real life violence has been largely discredited – it is an artificial one-off situation; • any violence in the media is seen by a large number of people and yet virtually none of these are influenced by the media to be violent; • active audience approaches, such as the uses and gratifications theory, see the audience as active consumers who make their own decisions and choices about the media they consume and the effects it has on them; • any other reasonable response. Band 0 [0 marks] No creditworthy response. Band 1 [1–3 marks] Answers in this band will show only a limited awareness of why violence in the media may not increase levels of violence in society. Responses may be short and undeveloped. e.g. ‘we don’t all copy what we see’ without justification/explanation. Sociological terms and concepts are unlikely to be used. At the bottom of the band (1 mark), expect one weak point. Higher in the band (2–3 marks), candidates may offer more than one weak point. Band 2 [4–6 marks] Answers in this band will show basic sociological knowledge and understanding of why violence in the media may not increase levels of violence in society. Responses may be underdeveloped and lacking in range. Candidates may explain some of the reasons e.g. audiences are not passive, they make their own consumption choices AND violence in the media is recognised by the audience to be fictional and thus does not affect their behaviour etc. At the bottom of the band, candidates are unlikely to use sociological terms and concepts accurately. Higher in the band, candidates may be beginning to use sociological terms and concepts with greater accuracy. However, some aspects of the answer may only be partially developed. 4(d) Band 3 [7–8 marks] Answers in this band will show good sociological knowledge and understanding of why violence in the media may not increase levels of violence in society and will be well developed and explained. Sociological terms and concepts will be used accurately, overall. Answers will be well focused on the question and there will be a range of reasons presented e.g. catharsis, sensitisation, shocking images, active audience etc. At the top of the band explanations will be clear throughout. 4(e) To what extent does the media continue to reinforce gender 15 stereotyping? Arguments for: • images of women seen in the media typically emphasise their physical appearance, the concept of ‘slim-blondeness’; • male gaze theory – Mulvey – the media gives males prominence and reduces women to traditional stereotypes; • females tend to be under-represented in most areas of the media, particularly lead roles and areas/topics considered to be important; • females are shown in a very narrow range of roles and these are typically the stereotypical roles of domestic life, mother, wife, girlfriend etc; • women in the media are typically airbrushed/digitally altered in order to give them an appearance that is not attainable by the audience, the stereotypical sex symbol; • women are shown to be passive, weak and helpless – in need of being rescued by the male hero – a common representation in films, for example; • Meehan’s ‘Ladies of the Evening’ research found females to be very stereotyped in their representations in the media; • hegemonic masculinity is still seen regularly in the media in the representation of males – the strong, action man for example; • males are still shown in the dominant position of head of the household – the breadwinner and the decision maker; • males are shown to be unemotional and if they do show their emotions are often ridiculed or sanctioned; • any other reasonable response. 4(e) Arguments against: • many examples now exist of females in the media playing the kind of roles once dominated by males – detectives, police officers, business people etc; • a diverse range of alternative representations of males can now be seen in the media i.e. the new man/metrosexual – David Beckham, for example; • both males and females are now frequently seen in the media as homosexuals, breaking away from their traditional stereotypical representations; • global media in the postmodern age offers the audience a diverse range of representations of gender that challenge traditional stereotypes; • social positions of men and women in society have changed and thus their representations in the media now reflect this; • with the rise of new media the audience has far more power than ever before to construct its own gender representations which may mean less gender stereotyping is seen; • many media effects theories (e.g. uses and gratifications theory) recognise that the audience are not passive consumers but instead make active choices about what they consume and how it affects them – therefore gender stereotypes in the media may have no effect at all on the audience; • representations of males and females in the media are converging and thus becoming more similar which means a move away from traditional stereotyping; • anti-sexism legislation means that the media have to take care in how they represent different genders in order to avoid complaints and litigation; • female media personnel – more women working in the media e.g. as directors, means less negative stereotyping of women; • any other reasonable response. Band 0 [0 marks] No creditworthy response. Band 1 [1–4 marks] Answers in this band may be vague and largely based on common sense showing limited knowledge of whether the media continue to reinforce gender stereotyping. Use of sociological terms or concepts is very unlikely. Responses may be short, undeveloped and one-sided e.g. may mention that women are shown as housewives and men as providers. Lower in the band (1–2 marks), expect one or two weak points. Higher in the band (3–4 marks) candidates may offer more than two points or provide a weak definition of key terms i.e. gender stereotypes are the simplistic and generalised ways that males and females are shown in the media. 4(e) Band 2 [5–8 marks] In this band candidates will show some basic knowledge of whether the media continue to reinforce gender stereotyping. Alternatively, they may offer an answer which is list-like in nature but there will be no real attempt to assess the issues raised by the question. There may be limited use of sociological terms or concepts. Responses may be underdeveloped and lack range. Candidates may give examples of gender stereotypes seen in TV shows, music videos and films. Answers may be simplistic and two-sided responses are unlikely. Lower in the band, the response will be rather narrow in the points covered and there will be little development. Higher in the band, more points will be covered and there will be limited development of some points. Alternatively, a list-like answer with little development covering both sides of the argument may score up to 8 marks. A one-sided answer cannot score higher than 8 marks. Band 3 [9–12 marks] Answers in this band will show good sociological knowledge and understanding of whether the media continue to reinforce gender stereotyping. Sociological terms and concepts will be used with greater accuracy and/or frequency. For the most part, answers will be well developed, focused on the question and there will be a range of points presented. Candidates may discuss the diversity of gender representations seen in the media and the role of the audience in determining whether and how these representations affect them. Examples of gender stereotypes and more contemporary representations are likely to be discussed. There will be a two-sided response but this may be unbalanced. At the bottom of the band, candidates may provide a narrower range of well-developed points. At the top of the band, expect a wider range of points and clear focus on the question. Band 4 [13–15 marks] Answers in this band will show excellent knowledge and understanding of whether the media continue to reinforce gender stereotyping. There will be a strong grasp of the argument as well as accurate and frequent use of sociological terms and concepts. Answers will be well developed, clearly focused on the question and discuss a wide range of points. Candidates may refer to ways in which the new media have changed the idea of representation in the media and given the audience more power to construct their own negotiated and oppositional portrayals of males and females i.e. gendered role reversal etc. Responses will be two-sided and balanced. At the bottom of the band (13 marks), the answer may lack a specific conclusion. Higher in the band, there will be a clear attempt to offer an assessment of the ‘To what extent…?’ part of the question through a focused conclusion. Candidates should show consideration of points for and against the idea of whether the media continue to reinforce gender stereotyping, citing some of the examples given.
3 Definitions of crime and deviance vary over time and between societies. Most people do not break the law, choosing instead to conform to society’s norms and values. However, trends in official statistics state that youth sub-cultures and some ethnic groups are often involved in deviant behaviour. Despite this, findings from victim surveys have challenged the accuracy of official statistics. (a) What is meant by the term ‘youth sub-culture’? [2] (b) Describe two reasons why crime rates for some ethnic groups are higher than for other ethnic groups. [4] (c) Explain how definitions of crime vary over time. [6] (d) Explain why most individuals conform to society’s norms and values. [8] (e) To what extent are victim surveys a more accurate measurement of crime than official crime statistics? [15] Section D: Media
35 marks
Mark scheme: 3(a) What is meant by the term ‘youth sub-culture’? 2 One mark for a partial definition, e.g. have their own norms and values. Two marks for a clear definition, e.g. a distinct smaller group within youth e.g. Goths. 3(b) Describe two reasons why crime rates for some ethnic groups are 4 higher than for other ethnic groups. Possible answers: racial discrimination – crime may be a response to experiencing racism and prejudice/stereotyping, a form of resistance to this unfair system that rejects society’s values; historical context – colonialism – a history of resentment to colonial authority may carry over and result in criminal behaviour for some ethnic groups; relative deprivation – rates of poverty are high amongst some minority ethnic groups, particularly in the inner cities, and this may lead them into committing instrumental crimes; marginalisation – feeling excluded from wider society and alienated from the core values may make turning to a life of crime more likely for some ethnic groups than others; deviancy amplification – police targeting and high rates of stop and search may result in some minority ethnic groups becoming disillusioned and frustrated with the justice system, fighting back and so getting arrested; labelling theory – some ethnic groups are labelled negatively by society and thus develop a self-fulfilling prophecy, making them act more deviantly and therefore be more likely to be arrested; peer pressure – gang activity is often associated with some minority ethnic groups who may live in areas where gang culture is a norm – it is hard not to then get involved with this; lack of opportunity – some minority ethnic groups do not do well in education and thus struggle to access good jobs in society meaning that crime becomes more attractive e.g. drug dealing; any other reasonable response. One mark for each point correctly identified (up to maximum of two). One mark for each point that is developed (up to a maximum of two). 3(c) Explain how definitions of crime vary over time. 6 Possible answers: laws – laws change over time and so definitions of what is criminal will also change e.g. not being allowed to smoke in a public place; norms and values – these evolve and change over time and this will affect definitions of criminality e.g. the age of consent; gender – feminism has ensured that gender expectations have significantly changed and this will affect definitions of crime e.g. laws on marital rape; age – as children are no longer typically seen as mini adults and tend to have an extended period of time in education, this changes the law regarding them e.g. child workers are now not allowed in many countries; racism – this is now a criminal offence worldwide therefore this has meant that racial prejudice and discrimination e.g. in the housing market has become a criminal offence; digital technology – the rise of technology across the globe means that new crimes are emerging all the time e.g. cybercrimes, corporate crime etc.; social media – now that these social networks are so globally entrenched, many opportunities for criminal offences that didn’t previously exist have opened up e.g. catfishing, fraud etc.; any other reasonable response. Band 0 [0 marks] No creditworthy response. Band 1 [1–3 marks] Answers in this band will show only a limited awareness of the question. Responses may be short and un/underdeveloped. At the bottom of the band (1 mark), expect one weak point. Higher in the band (2–3 marks), candidates may offer more than one weak point, but there may be a tendency towards simplistic answers, engaging with sociological ideas without using sociological language. Band 2 [4–6 marks] Answers in this band will have clear and accurate explanation, showing good sociological knowledge and understanding. Sociological terms and concepts should be expected and explained. At the bottom of the band, the range of points covered may be narrow or lack detail. Higher in the band, answers will cover more than one point in a well-developed way or cover several points in less detail. 3(d) Explain why most individuals conform to society’s norms and values. 8 Possible answers: functionalism – this theory says that individuals conform because there is a value consensus in society (that has been introduced in the primary socialisation stage) ensuring both social order and social solidarity; Marxism – Marxists say that the working class conform to ruling class ideologies and values because they are in an exploited position whereby they rely on the ruling class to pay their wages – they are effectively ‘wage slaves’; feminism – feminists say that females conform to the patriarchal norms and values of society and male control because all of the agents work together to protect male power; peer pressure – as children enter adolescence, the peer group becomes very influential and individuals often submit to peer group pressure just so they fit into the group; socialisation – this begins with the family and teaches individuals the correct norms and values for their society e.g. through imitation and canalisation; informal social control – these agents all use systems of rewards and sanctions to ensure that individuals do conform e.g. media ‘name and shame’ campaigns; formal social control – formal agents such as prison, the police and the courts deter people from deviant activity as they are fearful of the consequences; any other reasonable response. Band 0 [0 marks] No creditworthy response. Band 1 [1–3 marks] Answers in this band will show only a limited awareness of the question. A tendency to description is likely. Responses may be short and undeveloped and points stated without explanation. Sociological terms and concepts are unlikely to be used. At the bottom of the band (1 mark), expect one weak point. Higher in the band (2–3 marks), candidates may offer more than one weak point. Band 2 [4–6 marks] Answers in this band will show basic sociological knowledge and understanding. Responses may be underdeveloped and lacking in range. At the bottom of the band, candidates are unlikely to use sociological terms and concepts accurately. Higher in the band, candidates may be beginning to use sociological terms and concepts with greater accuracy. However, some aspects of the answer may only be partially developed/explained. Band 3 [7–8 marks] Answers in this band will show good sociological knowledge and understanding and will be well-developed and explained. Sociological terms and concepts will be used accurately overall. Answers will be well-focused on the question and there will be a range of points presented. At the top of the band explanations will be clear throughout. 3(e) To what extent are victim surveys a more accurate measurement of 15 crime than official crime statistics? Possible answers: Arguments for: unreported crime – victim surveys (VSs) get over the problem that the official crime statistics (OCS) have of unreported crimes. VSs ask people if they have been a victim of crime and thus are able to reveal more of the dark figure and are therefore more accurate; unrecorded crime – VSs get over the problem of unrecorded crime. It doesn’t matter if the police have recorded the crime as it will still feature in a VS, unlike in the OCS. This is therefore more accurate; British Crime Survey/national victim surveys – results show that there is a huge issue with the under-reporting of many crimes in terms of accuracy and show, for example, that the group thought to be the main offenders according to the OCS (young, males, inner-city, working class) are also the most likely to be victims of crime; combining VSs with OCS – this has been done, for example, in England and Wales as the Government recognises that VSs are needed in order to improve accuracy on the picture of crime – the CSEW; distrust of the police – in communities where there is little trust in the police the OCS will be very inaccurate in its picture of crime – VSs can help to give a more valid picture here e.g. gang related crime; criminals as victims – when some criminals are victims of crime these rarely get into the OCS, they can be shown in VSs, however, making the picture in the VSs more accurate e.g. prostitutes, drug dealers/users, etc.; local context – the OCS show a national picture of crime and so do not focus on the local context. Local VSs can bridge this gap and so give a more accurate picture of crime in specific areas; white-collar crime – these types of crime rarely feature in the OCS as companies often deal with the issues themselves and don’t want bad publicity – VSs can reveal more of the truth about these kind of crimes; any other reasonable response. Arguments against: sample – VSs involve asking a sample of people about their experiences of crime, the OCS looks at the entire country – the accuracy of any VS picture will depend upon the sample the data is drawn from e.g. may exclude anyone without an address = lacks representativeness; types of crimes – VSs cannot cover all types of crimes and so cannot be accurate e.g. victimless crimes and crimes against businesses are not covered whereas they are in the OCS; children – children are frequently the victims of crime, as shown in the OCS, but they are very unlikely to be included in a VS therefore we do not know about their experiences of crime from this source; sexual offences – many sociologists believe that these are hugely underreported in both the OCS and VSs meaning the picture is not accurate with either method; 3(e) memories – VSs rely upon the memory of respondents whereas the OCS is based on facts. People can forget things, exaggerate things etc. therefore we must question the accuracy and validity of VSs; social desirability – as most VSs take place in an interview format the relationship between the interviewer and the respondents becomes crucial to validity – respondents may lie, clam up and/or say what they feel is wanted. The OCS does not have this issue as there is no need for human interaction; victims only – VSs focus only on victims of crime whereas the OCS considers both criminals and victims which means there are concerns for the overall accuracy of the VS when looking at the picture of crime; methodological pluralism – no one method of measuring crime can be better than another for accuracy, it depends on the crime being considered therefore most sociologists will look at different sources of crime data; any other reasonable response. Band 0 [0 marks] No creditworthy response. Band 1 [1–4 marks] Answers in this band may be vague and largely based on common sense showing limited knowledge of the debate. Use of sociological terms or concepts is very unlikely. Responses may be short, undeveloped and one- sided. Lower in the band (1–2 marks), expect one or two weak points. Higher in the band (3–4 marks) candidates may offer more than two points and provide a weak definition of key terms in the question. Band 2 [5–8 marks] In this band candidates will show some basic knowledge of the debate. Alternatively, they may offer an answer which is list-like in nature but there will be no real attempt to assess the issues raised by the question. There may be limited/some use of sociological terms or concepts. Responses may be underdeveloped and lack range. Answers may be simplistic and two- sided or only cover one side of the debate. Lower in the band, the response may be rather narrow in the points covered and there may be some development. Higher in the band, more points are likely to be covered with some development. Alternatively, a list-like answer with some development covering both sides of the argument may score up to 8 marks. A one-sided answer cannot score higher than 8 marks. Band 3 [9–12 marks] Answers in this band will show good sociological knowledge and understanding of the debate. Sociological terms and concepts will be used with greater accuracy and/or frequency. For the most part, answers will be well-developed, focused on the question and there will be a range of points presented. There will be a two-sided response but it may lack range on one side. At the bottom of the band, candidates may provide a narrower range of developed points. At the top of the band, expect a wider range of developed points and clear focus on the question. 3(e) Band 4 [13–15 marks] Answers in this band will show excellent knowledge and understanding of the debate. There will be a strong grasp of the arguments as well as accurate and frequent use of sociological terms and concepts. Answers will be well-developed, clearly focused on the question and discuss a wide range of points. Responses will be two-sided and have a range of points on each side. At the bottom of the band (13 marks), the answer may lack a specific conclusion. Higher in the band, there will be a clear attempt to offer an assessment of the ‘To what extent?’ part of the question through a focused conclusion
2 Marxist, feminist and functionalist sociologists believe that schools have different functions. These include teaching social expectations, social control and socialisation. However, not all students conform to school rules and some join anti-school sub-cultures. Factors such as social class, gender and ethnicity can also affect educational achievement. (a) What is meant by the term ‘anti-school sub-culture’? [2] (b) Describe two features of comprehensive schools. [4] (c) Explain how schools teach social expectations to students. [6] (d) Explain why Marxist sociologists believe education is a form of social control. [8] (e) To what extent is ethnicity the main factor influencing educational achievement? [15] Section C: Crime, deviance and social control
35 marks
Mark scheme: 2(a) What is meant by the term ‘anti-school sub-culture’? 2 One mark for a partial definition, e.g. not liking school. Two marks for a clear definition, e.g. a group of students who reject the norms and values of the school. 2(b) Describe two features of comprehensive schools. 4 Possible answers: area – they tend to cater for children from the local area; non-selective – they accept students of all abilities; social backgrounds and inclusivity – they accept people from different social groups and communities to break down social barriers; free – they are typically non fee paying and the education is instead paid for by the state; equality – they were introduced due to a belief that all children should be given the same chance to succeed and improve their life chances – in the UK they replaced the Tripartite system of education; meritocracy – for functionalists comprehensive schools are part of the system of meritocracy that believes that all children can be successful through hard work and effort; setting/streaming – most comprehensive schools cater for the needs of different ability students through internal systems of setting and streaming; any other reasonable response. One mark for each point correctly identified (up to maximum of two). One mark for each point that is developed (up to a maximum of two). 2(c) Explain how schools teach social expectations to students. 6 Possible answers: formal education through lessons, curriculum content, classroom rules and structures social expectations are taught; informal education learning outside of the curriculum, extra-curricular activities and social interactions all teach social expectations such as the importance of punctuality, following instructions etc; hidden curriculum social expectations regarding norms, values, attitudes, roles etc. are taught and reinforced e.g. punctuality; rewards positive behaviour is encouraged through a system of rewards that aims to make students conform to social expectations; negative sanctions systems of punishment exist within schools to ensure that bad behaviour is seen to not be tolerated the punishments given discourage behaviour not in line with social expectations; teacher labelling – the way teachers treat students and the expectations they have of them (e.g. setting and streaming) can lead to students internalising these perceptions and acting accordingly; meritocracy functionalists believe that social expectations are taught through the culture in school of ‘you get what you deserve’ it is expected that you will work hard, behave, set goals and try your best; gender roles feminists believe that gendered norms and values are taught in school so that we learn that there are different social expectations of men and women in society e.g. men being more dominant and powerful; Marxism – not questioning authority and being submissive (these social expectations) are taught as ‘normal’ within schools and this deference to authority benefits capitalism through the workplace; any other reasonable response. Band 0 [0 marks] No creditworthy response. Band 1 [1–3 marks] Answers in this band will show only a limited awareness of the question. Responses may be short and un/underdeveloped. At the bottom of the band (1 mark), expect one weak point. Higher in the band (2–3 marks), candidates may offer more than one weak point, but there may be a tendency towards simplistic answers, engaging with sociological ideas without using sociological language. Band 2 [4–6 marks] Answers in this band will have clear and accurate explanation, showing good sociological knowledge and understanding. Sociological terms and concepts should be expected and explained. At the bottom of the band, the range of points covered may be narrow or lack detail. Higher in the band, answers will cover more than one point in a well- developed way or cover several points in less detail. 2(d) Explain why Marxist sociologists believe education is a form of social 8 control. Possible answers: common value system education controls people to believe the ideologies of the ruling class through the indoctrination of the working classes that will ensure they are good workers for the capitalist system; false consciousness the working classes are so controlled within and by education that they do not realise they are being used and exploited in preparation for the wider world; hidden curriculum this teaches us to be obedient, submissive, do as we are told by those in positions of authority thus preparing us for future roles as ‘wage slaves’ for the ruling class; unquestioning it’s not just our actions but also our thoughts that are controlled within education we are discouraged from questioning or criticising and taught that there is one, dominant understanding of the world that is correct (and of course supports capitalism); types of school attended the ruling and the working class send their children to different types of schools where different values are taught. Private education teaches the bourgeoisie that they are elite and helps them enter the ‘best’ universities working class children in state education are not so privileged; myth of meritocracy Marxists believe education controls us into conformity as we are taught that society is fair and we will get what we deserve therefore we don’t rebel or resist they say this is untrue and that society is riddled with inequalities; any other reasonable response. Band 0 [0 marks] No creditworthy response. Band 1 [1–3 marks] Answers in this band will show only a limited awareness of the question. A tendency to description is likely. Responses may be short and undeveloped and points stated without explanation. Sociological terms and concepts are unlikely to be used. At the bottom of the band (1 mark), expect one weak point. Higher in the band (2–3 marks), candidates may offer more than one weak point. Band 2 [4–6 marks] Answers in this band will show basic sociological knowledge and understanding. Responses may be underdeveloped and lacking in range. At the bottom of the band, candidates are unlikely to use sociological terms and concepts accurately. Higher in the band, candidates may be beginning to use sociological terms and concepts with greater accuracy. However, some aspects of the answer may only be partially developed/explained. Band 3 [7–8 marks] Answers in this band will show good sociological knowledge and understanding and will be well-developed and explained. Sociological terms and concepts will be used accurately overall. Answers will be well-focused on the question and there will be a range of points presented. At the top of the band explanations will be clear throughout. 2(e) To what extent is ethnicity the main factor influencing educational 15 achievement? Possible answers: Arguments for: patterns of achievement in many countries pupils from minority ethnic groups as a whole do not do as well as the average for the country; America concern has been expressed and interventions implemented to try and improve the performance of African-American pupils; UK pupils from Pakistani, Bangladeshi, Roma and Afro-Caribbean backgrounds do less well than the country’s average whereas Indian and Chinese pupils typically do better; social class links children from the minority ethnic groups that tend to do least well in education are often from working class backgrounds and live in poorer households; gender links girls from some Asian backgrounds may be socialised into more traditional female roles and thus may have limited educational and workplace aspirations; racism and discrimination if racism still exists in wider society then some minority ethnic pupils may be aware that their families are facing this and so ‘resist’ and rebel against the school’s authority; setting and streaming evidence shows that minority ethnic group pupils are disproportionately found in the lower sets and streams within a school which then negatively impacts upon their educational achievement; teacher stereotypes Becker ‘labelling’ theory teachers may make assumptions about some minority ethnic groups and not expect them to achieve well, perhaps labelling them as ‘trouble-makers’; ethnocentric curriculum what is taught in schools may treat the culture of the majority as more important than the minority e.g. in history lessons this can cause minority ethnic group students to lose interest; peer group if racism is not tackled efficiently within schools then there may be a culture of bullying and intimidation which is likely to negatively impact upon minority ethnic group students; lack of role models education is traditionally perceived as a ‘white’ institution based on ‘white’ values there are typically few minority ethnic group role models in positions of power within the educational system and this may de-motivate those students; cultural differences if the values at home clash with those of the school this may hamper pupil progress e.g. dress, appearance, diet, religion, values, customs etc; language barriers English may not be the first language for some minority ethnic group pupils they may be code switching at home and thus find it harder to access the school’s curriculum; any other reasonable response. Arguments against: gender is a better explanation for differences in student’s educational achievement (and all the arguments to support this); social class and material factors offer better explanations for differences in student’s educational achievement (and all the arguments to support this); 2(e) cultural deprivation this offers a better explanation for differences in student’s educational achievement (and all the arguments to support this); type of school attended this has more influence over student’s educational achievement than their ethnicity e.g. results are better in private than state education regardless of the ethnicity of the student; home and community factors are thought by many sociologists to be more important in explaining differences in educational achievement than a student’s ethnicity e.g. language, capital (Bourdieu) etc.; peer group the peer group a student is a member of is shown by research to be vital in influencing educational achievement e.g. anti- school sub-cultures (Willis) and pro-school sub-cultures; individual differences – interpretivist sociologists would argue that we cannot generalise reasons for patterns of educational achievement into a broad social factor such as ethnicity it is the individual circumstances and context of each student that needs to be considered; pluralist approach no one social factor can ever explain a person’s educational achievement e.g. ethnicity may well be important but needs to be combined with the gender and social class of the student i.e. lower class, male, Afro-Caribbeans in the UK do not typically do well in terms of educational achievement; any other reasonable response. Band 0 [0 marks] No creditworthy response. Band 1 [1–4 marks] Answers in this band may be vague and largely based on commonsense showing limited knowledge of the debate. Use of sociological terms or concepts is very unlikely. Responses may be short, undeveloped and one- sided. Lower in the band (1–2 marks), expect one or two weak points. Higher in the band (3–4 marks) candidates may offer more than two points and provide a weak definition of key terms in the question. Band 2 [5–8 marks] In this band candidates will show some basic knowledge of the debate. Alternatively, they may offer an answer which is list-like in nature but there will be no real attempt to assess the issues raised by the question. There may be limited/some use of sociological terms or concepts. Responses may be underdeveloped and lack range. Answers may be simplistic and two-sided or only cover one side of the debate. Lower in the band, the response may be rather narrow in the points covered and there may be some development. Higher in the band, more points are likely to be covered with some development. Alternatively, a list-like answer with some development covering both sides of the argument may score up to 8 marks. A one-sided answer cannot score higher than 8 marks. 2(e) Band 3 [9–12 marks] Answers in this band will show good sociological knowledge and understanding of the debate. Sociological terms and concepts will be used with greater accuracy and/or frequency. For the most part, answers will be well-developed, focused on the question and there will be a range of points presented. There will be a two-sided response, but it may lack range on one side. At the bottom of the band, candidates may provide a narrower range of developed points. At the top of the band, expect a wider range of developed points and clear focus on the question. Band 4 [13–15 marks] Answers in this band will show excellent knowledge and understanding of the debate. There will be a strong grasp of the arguments as well as accurate and frequent use of sociological terms and concepts. Answers will be well- developed, clearly focused on the question and discuss a wide range of points. Responses will be two-sided and have a range of points on each side. At the bottom of the band (13 marks), the answer may lack a specific conclusion. Higher in the band, there will be a clear attempt to offer an assessment of the ‘To what extent?’ part of the question through a focused conclusion.
3 There are many explanations for crime such as labelling theory and Marxism, as well as explanations which consider age, ethnicity and gender. For example, the media often represents males as more criminal. In reality not all males have the same chance of being arrested. Due to the negative effects of crime, society focuses on different forms of crime prevention. (a) What is meant by the term ‘crime prevention’? [2] (b) Describe two examples of cyber crimes. [4] (c) Explain how age can affect criminal behaviour. [6] (d) Explain why not all males have the same chance of being arrested. [8] (e) To what extent is labelling theory the best explanation for crime and deviance? [15] Section D: Media
35 marks
Mark scheme: 3(a) What is meant by the term ‘crime prevention’? 2 One mark for a partial definition, e.g. surveillance. Two marks for a clear definition, e.g. attempts by agencies or individuals to reduce crime, enforce laws and maintain criminal justice. 3(b) Describe two examples of cyber crimes. 4 Possible answers: spreading computer viruses and malware; fraud and identity theft; internet scams targeting individual users e.g. catfishing; harassment by cyberstalking or cyberbullying; websites with obscene or offensive content and the spread of such content via email/mobile phone; the dark web e.g. trade in illegal drugs and other illegal goods; cyberterrorism – using the internet for deliberate, widespread attacks on computers or computer networks e.g. hacking; any other reasonable response. One mark for each point correctly identified (up to maximum of two). One mark for each point that is developed (up to a maximum of two). 3(c) Explain how age can affect criminal behaviour. 6 Possible answers: youth sub-cultures young people are more likely than older to join a sub-culture such as Punks or Skins and engage in criminal/deviant behaviour; gangs young people may be peer pressured into becoming involved with criminal behaviour such as violence, trafficking and drug dealing; work the elderly and the very young are unable to commit white-collar and corporate crime as they do not have access to the workplace the middle aged do; crimes related to new technologies older people do not typically have the ICT/digital skills necessary to engage in many cyber-crimes, making it more likely to be committed by younger people; status crimes many crimes committed by younger people are only crimes because of the offenders age e.g. under-age drinking; Matza drift theory this research shows that most younger people drift into minor crimes but as they get older drift back out they are not career criminals; juvenile delinquency Chambliss this study showed how prolific delinquency was in working class youth; postmodernism young people are more likely to commit crime because they are in search of thrills and excitement; more to lose older people have more responsibilities and more to lose from a criminal lifestyle therefore are less likely to take part in a crime; the elderly may not have the physical strength necessary to commit many crimes; Japan ageing population here there is a big rise in crimes committed by the elderly and special prison accommodation has begun to be built to accommodate these criminals; any other reasonable response. Band 0 [0 marks] No creditworthy response. Band 1 [1–3 marks] Answers in this band will show only a limited awareness of the question. Responses may be short and un/underdeveloped. At the bottom of the band (1 mark), expect one weak point. Higher in the band (2–3 marks), candidates may offer more than one weak point, but there may be a tendency towards simplistic answers, engaging with sociological ideas without using sociological language. Band 2 [4–6 marks] Answers in this band will have clear and accurate explanation, showing good sociological knowledge and understanding. Sociological terms and concepts should be expected and explained. At the bottom of the band, the range of points covered may be narrow or lack detail. Higher in the band, answers will cover more than one point in a well-developed way or cover several points in less detail. 3(d) Explain why not all males have the same chance of being arrested. 8 Possible answers: age younger males are more likely to be arrested than older males due to stereotypes, gang membership, status frustration etc.; ethnicity some minority ethnic males are more likely to be stopped and searched than others which will affect the arrest rate social class males in the lower social classes are more likely to be arrested due to police targeting and criminalisation of working classes; material deprivation Marxism men who are living in poverty are more likely to be arrested as they are more likely to commit crime; educational success those males who have done well in education and gained qualifications are less likely to be arrested than those without qualifications as they form part of the ‘invisible criminals; types of masculinity Connell hegemonic males are more likely to be arrested than new men and other more modern versions of masculinity as they can get into altercations, be resistant to authority etc.; labelling theory Becker some males are labelled as criminal by those in power and thus may suffer from a self-fulfilling prophecy and adopt a deviant career which is likely to involve being arrested; Cicourel typical offender the police and the courts all have a stereotype of who typically commits crime meaning that those males who don’t match up are unlikely to come to the authorities attention; Chambliss – saints and the roughnecks this study showed that police were far more likely to arrest working class male ‘roughnecks’ than middle class male ‘saints’, despite them committing the same acts; • socialisation New Right/Murray how a male is brought up, his norms and values will influence whether he commits a crime or is arrested; • any other reasonable response. Band 0 [0 marks] No creditworthy response. Band 1 [1–3 marks] Answers in this band will show only a limited awareness of the question. A tendency to description is likely. Responses may be short and undeveloped and points stated without explanation. Sociological terms and concepts are unlikely to be used. At the bottom of the band (1 mark), expect one weak point. Higher in the band (2–3 marks), candidates may offer more than one weak point. Band 2 [4–6 marks] Answers in this band will show basic sociological knowledge and understanding. Responses may be underdeveloped and lacking in range. At the bottom of the band, candidates are unlikely to use sociological terms and concepts accurately. Higher in the band, candidates may be beginning to use sociological terms and concepts with greater accuracy. However, some aspects of the answer may only be partially developed/explained. 3(d) Band 3 [7–8 marks] Answers in this band will show good sociological knowledge and understanding and will be well-developed and explained. Sociological terms and concepts will be used accurately overall. Answers will be well-focused on the question and there will be a range of points presented. At the top of the band explanations will be clear throughout. 3(e) To what extent is labelling theory the best explanation for crime and 15 deviance? Possible answers: Arguments for: Labelling theory Becker everyone does things that could be labelled criminal but only a small number of people actually get labelled and this then leads to us forming stereotypes of who the criminals are; self-fulfilling prophecy being labelled as criminal or deviant causes people to live up to the label and act accordingly; deviancy amplification police and other formal agents’ labels can actually cause more crime and deviance in society e.g. Young ‘The Drugtakers’ and Cohen ‘Mods and Rockers’; police targeting the police target certain social groups e.g. stop and search rates for some social groups are far higher than for others which explains their distrust of the police and their criminality; deviant career when a labelled person’s self-identity starts to change (due to the labelling process) then they may adopt a deviant career and join an organised deviant group e.g. a gang, that justifies and normalises their offending; Cicourel typical delinquent this study shows that courts and police have a picture of who typically commits crime and those individuals that fit this picture are more likely to be thought of as criminals; master status this status overrides all others and becomes the way an individual sees themselves as well as how others see them if this is as a criminal then it is not surprising that criminal behaviour continues; secondary and primary deviance Lemert primary deviance refers to acts that are not labelled as criminal, secondary to those that are; power labels have such an influence on people because they are given by those in positions of power such as the police, the courts and teachers. This makes the criminal label stick and hard to get rid of thus a life of crime becomes the only option; any other reasonable response. Arguments against: functionalism some crime and deviance is necessary in society as it reminds people of the boundaries between acceptable and unacceptable behaviour thus promoting social order; Merton’s strain theory crime occurs when there is a mismatch between individuals’ goals and their ability to achieve these legitimately; Cohen status frustration crime is committed because some people feel anger and frustration about their position in society and inability to gain status legitimately; relative deprivation in a consumer society many people feel it is unjust that they do not have what others do which may lead some to crime; 3(e) Marxism material deprivation those in poverty are more likely to turn to crime because they need money to survive; feminism domestic abuse and sexual assault this is committed due to patriarchal structures in society and a male need to prove their power and dominance, keeping women ‘in their place’; Messerschmidt masculinity males feel a lot of pressure to be the provider and to act tough this can sometimes lead to criminal behaviour; postmodernism crime is committed because it is thrilling and exciting; Miller focal concerns crime and deviance is committed because many of the norms and values of the working class are similar to crime and deviance; self-negating prophecy labels do not have to be lived up to, they can be resisted instead; any other reasonable response. Band 0 [0 marks] No creditworthy response. Band 1 [1–4 marks] Answers in this band may be vague and largely based on common sense showing limited knowledge of the debate. Use of sociological terms or concepts is very unlikely. Responses may be short, undeveloped and one- sided. Lower in the band (1–2 marks), expect one or two weak points. Higher in the band (3–4 marks) candidates may offer more than two points and provide a weak definition of key terms in the question. Band 2 [5–8 marks] In this band candidates will show some basic knowledge of the debate. Alternatively, they may offer an answer which is list-like in nature but there will be no real attempt to assess the issues raised by the question. There may be limited/some use of sociological terms or concepts. Responses may be underdeveloped and lack range. Answers may be simplistic and two-sided or only cover one side of the debate. Lower in the band, the response may be rather narrow in the points covered and there may be some development. Higher in the band, more points are likely to be covered with some development. Alternatively, a list-like answer with some development covering both sides of the argument may score up to 8 marks. A one-sided answer cannot score higher than 8 marks. 3(e) Band 3 [9–12 marks] Answers in this band will show good sociological knowledge and understanding of the debate. Sociological terms and concepts will be used with greater accuracy and/or frequency. For the most part, answers will be well-developed, focused on the question and there will be a range of points presented. There will be a two-sided response but it may lack range on one side. At the bottom of the band, candidates may provide a narrower range of developed points. At the top of the band, expect a wider range of developed points and clear focus on the question. Band 4 [13–15 marks] Answers in this band will show excellent knowledge and understanding of the debate. There will be a strong grasp of the arguments as well as accurate and frequent use of sociological terms and concepts. Answers will be well- developed, clearly focused on the question and discuss a wide range of points. Responses will be two-sided and have a range of points on each side. At the bottom of the band (13 marks), the answer may lack a specific conclusion. Higher in the band, there will be a clear attempt to offer an assessment of the ‘To what extent?’ part of the question through a focused conclusion.
2 Education has been described by some sociologists as a meritocratic system which does not allow discrimination. Feminists disagree and are critical of both formal and informal education. All educational institutions try to control students and ensure social conformity through rewards and sanctions. (a) What is meant by the term ‘discrimination’? [2] (b) Describe two examples of informal education. [4] (c) Explain how education is a meritocratic system. [6] (d) Explain why some feminists are critical of the education system. [8] (e) To what extent are the rewards and sanctions used in schools effective for creating social conformity? [15] Section C: Crime, deviance and social control
35 marks
Mark scheme: 2(a) What is meant by the term ‘discrimination’? 2 One mark for a partial definition, e.g. racism. Two marks for a clear definition, e.g. when a social group e.g. minority ethnic groups are treated unfairly compared to other social groups. 2(b) Describe two examples of informal education. 4 Possible answers: location – can take place outside classrooms at home or work or through daily interactions; extra-curricular activities – these form part of informal education as children learn skills such as team-work and communication which are not explicit parts of the formal education system; hidden curriculum – informal education in schools – children learn the acceptable forms of behaviour and attitudes through the way the school is run and how teachers act, not formal lesson content; norms and values – informal education teaches these to children, both inside and outside school; sanctions/social control – informal education is under-pinned by a system of sanctions that control children’s behaviour to ensure social conformity e.g. peer pressure in the playground; any other reasonable response. One mark for each point correctly identified (up to maximum of two). One mark for each point that is developed (up to a maximum of two). 2(c) Explain how education is a meritocratic system. 6 Possible answers: comprehensive schools – these accept students of all abilities and offer the same opportunities to all students; national curriculum – all students study the same core subjects and curriculum, giving everyone the same opportunities; compensatory education – some social groups identified as being disadvantaged are compensated for in their education e.g. through funding, additional tutoring etc. therefore ensuring the system is fair; positive discrimination – some groups of students who have historically not performed well in education are treated more favorably than others to remove any unfair disadvantage; legislation – equal opportunities and anti-discrimination acts ensure that all students receive the same opportunities in education; universal standards – in education every student is judged objectively to the same agreed standards – this is fair; social mobility – education is the main gateway to social mobility and thus must be a fair system in order to achieve this; achieved status – in education students are judged on their individual merits rather than any family ascribed status – this is therefore a fair system; any other reasonable response. Band 0 [0 marks] No creditworthy response. Band 1 [1–3 marks] Answers in this band will show only a limited awareness of the question. Responses may be short and un/underdeveloped. At the bottom of the band (1 mark), expect one weak point. Higher in the band (2–3 marks), candidates may offer more than one weak point, but there may be a tendency towards simplistic answers, engaging with sociological ideas without using sociological language. Band 2 [4–6 marks] Answers in this band will have clear and accurate explanation, showing good sociological knowledge and understanding. Sociological terms and concepts should be expected and explained. At the bottom of the band, the range of points covered may be narrow or lack detail. Higher in the band, answers will cover more than one point in a well-developed way or cover several points in less detail. 2(d) Explain why some feminists are critical of the education system. 8 Possible answers: access to education – in some countries the education of boys is valued more highly than girls meaning that boys are more likely to attend school; Parsons – many functionalists believe that for society to function properly it requires males to take the instrumental and females the expressive role – feminists believe these gender roles are inculcated through the education system; subject choice – when given the option of choice, boys and girls tend to choose quite different subjects – those of the boys are typically higher status and perceived often as ‘harder’ than the female subjects chosen – this can limit female career opportunities; workplace – feminists are critical of the fact that despite girls doing better than boys in education in most countries today, when it comes to the workplace men still have more status and better pay; role models – in education most positions of responsibility and superiority e.g. head-teacher are typically filled by men – this sends out the message that males are more important than females; representation – textbooks and reading books have been criticised by feminists for the ways they show males and females e.g. giving females the passive and males the active role; patriarchy – feminists believe that through the hidden curriculum patriarchal norms and values are reinforced in students; teacher bias – i.e. favouring boys in the classroom due to patriarchy; classrooms – research shows that classroom space, teacher time and attention is all dominated by boys – this does not give girls the same experiences or opportunities; any other reasonable response. Band 0 [0 marks] No creditworthy response. Band 1 [1–3 marks] Answers in this band will show only a limited awareness of the question. A tendency to description is likely. Responses may be short and undeveloped and points stated without explanation. Sociological terms and concepts are unlikely to be used. At the bottom of the band (1 mark), expect one weak point. Higher in the band (2–3 marks), candidates may offer more than one weak point. Band 2 [4–6 marks] Answers in this band will show basic sociological knowledge and understanding. Responses may be underdeveloped and lacking in range. At the bottom of the band, candidates are unlikely to use sociological terms and concepts accurately. Higher in the band, candidates may be beginning to use sociological terms and concepts with greater accuracy. However, some aspects of the answer may only be partially developed/explained. 2(d) Band 3 [7–8 marks] Answers in this band will show good sociological knowledge and understanding and will be well-developed and explained. Sociological terms and concepts will be used accurately overall. Answers will be well-focused on the question and there will be a range of points presented. At the top of the band explanations will be clear throughout. 2(e) To what extent are the rewards and sanctions used in schools effective 15 for creating social conformity? Possible answers: Arguments for: functionalism – these sociologists believe that social control is one of the main functions performed by schools and thus must be effective; social conformity – most students do as they are told, engage with the education system and eventually take examinations – systems of rewards and punishments must therefore be effective; rewards – these are used to motivate students and to encourage them to conform e.g. stickers, prizes etc.; sanctions – these are used to discourage unwanted behaviour, e.g. detentions, isolations etc.; deterrence – the use of sanctions in school deters other students from not conforming as they do not want to be punished; social expectations – society’s norms and values are at the heart of all systems of rewards and sanctions and thus reinforce what students are learning from the other agencies of socialisation; gender roles – schools encourage males to act in a certain way and females in a different way e.g. asking girls to tidy up and boys to carry heavy boxes – feminists believe this encourages conformity to the patriarchal system; student sub-cultures – most students are not a part of a rebellious sub- culture therefore are following the systems of rewards and sanctions successfully; any other reasonable response. Arguments against: peer pressure – students may be more likely to follow their peers than the school rules; anti-school sub-cultures – the existence of these sub-cultures demonstrates that not all students conform e.g. Willis ‘the lads’; Marxism – these sociologists believe that whilst students may seem to be accepting of the rules in school they may still be politically militant, strike and protest after leaving education; feminism – ‘girl power’, #metoo, career women and female success stories demonstrate that patriarchal control in school is not as effective as some may think; home factors – the influence of the home is thought by many to be far more influential than school in terms of controlling students e.g. the fear of being disciplined by a parent is what makes students conform, not the school itself; individual choice – students are individuals and thus can all make their own decisions about whether or not they will allow themselves to be influenced or controlled by school and education; 2(e) exclusion rates – concerns over the number of students – particularly minority ethnic groups, males and the working class – who are excluded from school demonstrates that the social control measures are not always effective; body and mind – whilst schools may control what students can and can’t do they cannot control what students think and therefore can only ever have only limited success in terms of control; any other reasonable response. Band 0 [0 marks] No creditworthy response. Band 1 [1–4 marks] Answers in this band may be vague and largely based on common sense showing limited knowledge of the debate. Use of sociological terms or concepts is very unlikely. Responses may be short, undeveloped and one- sided. Lower in the band (1–2 marks), expect one or two weak points. Higher in the band (3–4 marks) candidates may offer more than two points and provide a weak definition of key terms in the question. Band 2 [5–8 marks] In this band candidates will show some basic knowledge of the debate. Alternatively, they may offer an answer which is list-like in nature but there will be no real attempt to assess the issues raised by the question. There may be limited/some use of sociological terms or concepts. Responses may be underdeveloped and lack range. Answers may be simplistic and two-sided or only cover one side of the debate. Lower in the band, the response may be rather narrow in the points covered and there may be some development. Higher in the band, more points are likely to be covered with some development. Alternatively, a list-like answer with some development covering both sides of the argument may score up to 8 marks. A one-sided answer cannot score higher than 8 marks. Band 3 [9–12 marks] Answers in this band will show good sociological knowledge and understanding of the debate. Sociological terms and concepts will be used with greater accuracy and/or frequency. For the most part, answers will be well- developed, focused on the question and there will be a range of points presented. There will be a two-sided response but it may lack range on one side. At the bottom of the band, candidates may provide a narrower range of developed points. At the top of the band, expect a wider range of developed points and clear focus on the question. Band 4 [13–15 marks] Answers in this band will show excellent knowledge and understanding of the debate. There will be a strong grasp of the arguments as well as accurate and frequent use of sociological terms and concepts. Answers will be well- developed, clearly focused on the question and discuss a wide range of points. Responses will be two-sided and have a range of points on each side. At the bottom of the band (13 marks), the answer may lack a specific conclusion. Higher in the band, there will be a clear attempt to offer an assessment of the ‘To what extent?’ part of the question through a focused conclusion.
3 There are many ways to prevent crime, for example effective socialisation and informal social control. Official crime statistics show that some members of sub-cultures commit acts of crime and deviance. However, some sociologists argue that official crime statistics may not be accurate. Official crime statistics rely on members of the public reporting crime and issues with police behaviour. (a) What is meant by the term ‘informal social control’? [2] (b) Describe two examples of white-collar crime. [4] (c) Explain how police behaviour can affect the official crime statistics. [6] (d) Explain why sub-cultures can be linked to crime and deviance. [8] (e) To what extent can effective socialisation prevent crime? [15] Section D: Media
35 marks
Mark scheme: 3(a) What is meant by the term ‘informal social control’? 2 One mark for a partial definition, e.g. peers are an agent of informal social control. Two marks for a clear definition, e.g. unwritten rules and methods that people use to get others to conform to the norms. 3(b) Describe two examples of white-collar crime. 4 Possible answers identity theft e.g. stealing a person’s identity in order to use it for illegal purposes; fraud/embezzlement – theft or misappropriation of funds placed in one's trust or belonging to one's employer; bribery – using threats, fear and coercion in order to gain financial assets from an individual, institution or a company; corporate crime – crimes committed by organisations in pursuit of profit for the company; fiddling expenses – lying or manipulating expenses claims in order to claim more money than you are entitled to; stealing from the workplace – taking goods/networks/items from the workplace for personal gain; any other reasonable response. One mark for each point correctly identified (up to maximum of two). One mark for each point that is developed (up to a maximum of two). 3(c) Explain how police behaviour can affect the official crime statistics. 6 Possible answers: police targeting – Cicourel typical offender – this means that certain social groups are more likely to be targeted, arrested and prosecuted than others which skews the OCS; police initiatives – when police forces focus on particular crimes the prosecution rates, and thus the OCS, increase for this crime e.g. drink driving; resistance – Marxism – high rates of stop and search for some social groups can cause anger and frustration and result in them resisting arrest causing deviancy amplification and a rise in the OCS e.g. recent examples of BLM protests and police arrests; labelling theory – Becker – if an individual fits the stereotype of a criminal held by the police then they are more likely to be arrested and go through the system e.g. chivalry factor, Pollak, shows how males are more likely to feature in the OCS than females; feminism – sexual assault and domestic abuse – the police often have little involvement or success in these types of crimes and thus according to the OCS they are rarely committed – in reality the picture is very different; criminalisation of the working class – Marxism – the police are agents of the state and so ignore corporate, state and green crime in favour of the street crime committed by the working classes – the OCS therefore shows crime to be a working class problem; surveillance – police surveillance operations can result in more criminals being caught and a surge in the numbers in the OCS; police racism – institutional racism within the police force may lead to increased levels of stop and search for ethnic minority individuals as well as higher arrest and prosecution rates – this will then distort the picture of crime in the OCS; any other reasonable response. Band 0 [0 marks] No creditworthy response. Band 1 [1–3 marks] Answers in this band will show only a limited awareness of the question. Responses may be short and un/underdeveloped. At the bottom of the band (1 mark), expect one weak point. Higher in the band (2–3 marks), candidates may offer more than one weak point, but there may be a tendency towards simplistic answers, engaging with sociological ideas without using sociological language. Band 2 [4–6 marks] Answers in this band will have clear and accurate explanation, showing good sociological knowledge and understanding. Sociological terms and concepts should be expected and explained. At the bottom of the band, the range of points covered may be narrow or lack detail. Higher in the band, answers will cover more than one point in a well-developed way or cover several points in less detail. 3(d) Explain why sub-cultures can be linked to crime and deviance. 8 Possible answers: Merton – a possible response to status frustration is the development of new goals which may lead to a sub-culture emerging with different norms and values to those within wider society e.g. deviant anti-school sub- cultures; gaining status – crime and deviance in sub-cultures can be a way of gaining status (Cohen) when status cannot be gained by legitimate means; Cloward and Ohlin – illegitimate opportunity structure – in some working class communities criminal sub-cultures exist with successful role models so young men may choose crime as a career; conflict sub-culture – violence and gang warfare may be chosen by some individuals as a way to make money; retreatist sub-culture – drug addiction can be chosen by some individuals when they are unable to be successful either legitimately or illegitimately – drug use and dealing are closely linked with crime and deviance; Miller – focal concerns – his research saw the behaviour and lifestyles of working class males (a sub-culture) as being closely linked to crime and deviance; youth sub-cultures – these are often involved in criminal and delinquent behaviour e.g. the Skins, Punks, Chavs etc.; juvenile gangs – these have recently caused the public much concern through activities such as knife and gun crime; any other reasonable response. Band 0 [0 marks] No creditworthy response. Band 1 [1–3 marks] Answers in this band will show only a limited awareness of the question. A tendency to description is likely. Responses may be short and undeveloped and points stated without explanation. Sociological terms and concepts are unlikely to be used. At the bottom of the band (1 mark), expect one weak point. Higher in the band (2–3 marks), candidates may offer more than one weak point. Band 2 [4–6 marks] Answers in this band will show basic sociological knowledge and understanding. Responses may be underdeveloped and lacking in range. At the bottom of the band, candidates are unlikely to use sociological terms and concepts accurately. Higher in the band, candidates may be beginning to use sociological terms and concepts with greater accuracy. However, some aspects of the answer may only be partially developed/explained. Band 3 [7–8 marks] Answers in this band will show good sociological knowledge and understanding and will be well-developed and explained. Sociological terms and concepts will be used accurately overall. Answers will be well-focused on the question and there will be a range of points presented. At the top of the band explanations will be clear throughout. 3(e) To what extent can effective socialisation prevent crime? 15 Possible answers: Arguments for: primary socialisation – in the early years the family has a huge influence over a child’s norms and values and can thus bring them up to understand what is right and wrong, so preventing crime (functionalism); inadequate socialisation – the New Right (Murray) believes that poor parenting is closely linked to offending, this can be avoided through effective family socialisation in the nuclear family; feral children – e.g. Oxana/Genie show the damage that ineffective socialisation can do to children – this emphasises the importance of effective socialisation in bringing up well-rounded, non-criminal children; education – the hidden curriculum and formal control in schools ensures students conform to authority. Marxists say they carry this into wider society and continue to do as they are told, thus preventing crime; media – the media shows the consequences of criminality and demonises many criminals and types of crime – this deters individuals from committing crime themselves; religion – this teaches positive norms and values such as kindness, compassion and helping others, the antithesis of criminal behaviour – a religious upbringing can therefore prevent crime; peer group – if the peer group is conformist and does not commit crime then an individual is unlikely to do so – most peer groups are conformist; workplace – employees who commit criminal acts will not be employed in certain jobs and can be sacked form their job of a crime is committed; any other reasonable response. Arguments against: individualism – no socialisation process can prevent crime as every individual can make their own decisions about whether to offend; resistance and rebellion – socialisation teaches individuals the acceptable norms and values of society but cannot ensure that people conform to this therefore crime and deviance can and does occur; social class – Miller focal concerns – his research shows that the norms and values of working class males are closely linked to criminal behaviour, therefore their socialisation may encourage crime; poverty – a lack of money and resources may push someone to commit crime, regardless of their socialisation (Marxism); gender – Messerschmidt believes that males are socialised to be masculine which is linked to criminal behaviour – the norms and values of hegemonic masculinity are closely linked to criminality; ethnicity – some ethnic/religious groups may have been socialised into different norms and values to wider society and may indulge in behaviour that society defines as criminal; consumer society – this causes relative deprivation for many which may lead to crime and deviance, socialisation won’t prevent this as consumerism is at the heart of most society’s core values; formal social control – socialisation is not strict enough to prevent crime. The only agents that can do this are the formal ones such as the courts and prison system; 3(e) Matza – drift theory – this theory shows that most young people do drift into crime in their adolescence regardless of their socialisation, showing that socialisation cannot prevent crime; any other reasonable response. Band 0 [0 marks] No creditworthy response. Band 1 [1–4 marks] Answers in this band may be vague and largely based on common sense showing limited knowledge of the debate. Use of sociological terms or concepts is very unlikely. Responses may be short, undeveloped and one- sided. Lower in the band (1–2 marks), expect one or two weak points. Higher in the band (3–4 marks) candidates may offer more than two points and provide a weak definition of key terms in the question. Band 2 [5–8 marks] In this band candidates will show some basic knowledge of the debate. Alternatively, they may offer an answer which is list-like in nature but there will be no real attempt to assess the issues raised by the question. There may be limited/some use of sociological terms or concepts. Responses may be underdeveloped and lack range. Answers may be simplistic and two-sided or only cover one side of the debate. Lower in the band, the response may be rather narrow in the points covered and there may be some development. Higher in the band, more points are likely to be covered with some development. Alternatively, a list-like answer with some development covering both sides of the argument may score up to 8 marks. A one-sided answer cannot score higher than 8 marks. Band 3 [9–12 marks] Answers in this band will show good sociological knowledge and understanding of the debate. Sociological terms and concepts will be used with greater accuracy and/or frequency. For the most part, answers will be well- developed, focused on the question and there will be a range of points presented. There will be a two-sided response but it may lack range on one side. At the bottom of the band, candidates may provide a narrower range of developed points. At the top of the band, expect a wider range of developed points and clear focus on the question. Band 4 [13–15 marks] Answers in this band will show excellent knowledge and understanding of the debate. There will be a strong grasp of the arguments as well as accurate and frequent use of sociological terms and concepts. Answers will be well- developed, clearly focused on the question and discuss a wide range of points. Responses will be two-sided and have a range of points on each side. At the bottom of the band (13 marks), the answer may lack a specific conclusion. Higher in the band, there will be a clear attempt to offer an assessment of the ‘To what extent?’ part of the question through a focused conclusion.
4 The media is an important institution in society and can have a big impact on audiences’ lives. This can be due to how different social groups use the media as well as the media’s influence on attitudes and behaviour. Media convergence exists and some sociologists are concerned about biased content and the creation of folk devils. However, other sociologists disagree and claim that it is the audience that determines media content. (a) What is meant by the term ‘convergence’? [2] (b) Describe two ways the working class use the media differently to other social classes. [4] (c) Explain how folk devils are created in the media. [6] (d) Explain why sociologists believe the media is biased. [8] (e) To what extent do the audience determine media content? [15]
35 marks
Mark scheme: 4(a) What is meant by the term ‘convergence’? 2 One mark for a partial definition, e.g. using a mobile phone to watch videos. Two marks for a clear definition, e.g. when previously distinct media technologies and platforms merge through digital technology. 4(b) Describe two ways the working class use the media differently to other 4 social classes. Possible answers: newspapers – the working class are said to read tabloids e.g. ‘The Sun’, ‘The Mirror’ etc. – broadsheets are associated with the higher social classes; TV – the working class are said to watch mainstream TV – soap operas, reality shows and game shows more frequently than other social classes; satellite – the working class are said to often pay for satellite and cable services to enable them to watch football and other sports known as ‘working class diversions’; new media – used more by the working class for entertainment rather than for work, social networks or serious pursuits; digital divide – poorer people are less exposed to digital technology and so are less proficient in its usage; the working class are said to consume more popular culture than high culture media output – unlike the higher social classes; the working class are said to use the media more for entertainment than for information or education (uses and gratifications theory); any other reasonable response. One mark for each point correctly identified (up to maximum of two). One mark for each point that is developed (up to a maximum of two). 4(c) Explain how folk devils are created in the media. 6 Possible answers: teenage representations – this social group are often represented as rebellious, delinquent and violent. They therefore often appear in moral panics as folk devils e.g. Cohen ‘mods and rockers’ study; news values – media companies want to maximise their audience in order to maximise their profits therefore stereotypical and shocking stories and representations are often used – this leads to the creation of folk devils; scapegoats – the public and the media want someone to blame for any social problems or disorder and therefore this can lead to the creation of folk devils e.g. Islamophobia; Marxism – the ruling class need to divert attention from their own wrongdoings and exploitative practices and therefore the media, as a tool of the state, can be used to create folk devils who the public can blame instead of the Government e.g. 2011 London riots; exaggeration and sensationalism – these are both features of reporting in a moral panic and are what can lead to the creation of a folk devil as the public start to demand action e.g. Fawbert ‘the hoodies’; labelling theory and stereotyping – the media identify a social group who have been negatively labelled and who then become the media’s folk devils; any other reasonable response. Band 0 [0 marks] No creditworthy response. Band 1 [1–3 marks] Answers in this band will show only a limited awareness of the question. Responses may be short and un/underdeveloped. At the bottom of the band (1 mark), expect one weak point. Higher in the band (2–3 marks), candidates may offer more than one weak point, but there may be a tendency towards simplistic answers, engaging with sociological ideas without using sociological language. Band 2 [4–6 marks] Answers in this band will have clear and accurate explanation, showing good sociological knowledge and understanding. Sociological terms and concepts should be expected and explained. At the bottom of the band, the range of points covered may be narrow or lack detail. Higher in the band, answers will cover more than one point in a well-developed way or cover several points in less detail. 4(d) Explain why sociologists believe the media is biased. 8 Possible answers: political bias – the political position of a media text can be seen in its choice of language, images, stories covered and tone e.g. Fox News is right wing; news values – stories that include these popular news values are more likely to make it into publication or broadcast meaning that the news stories the audience can consume are biased; gate-keeper – the editor, journalist or owner has a lot of influence over the content of the news and can decide on what will be included in the schedule as well as the opinions the story will take – this is an example of bias; Marxism – this theory states that the news is biased in favour of the ruling class and will ridicule or exclude any stories critical of this or alternative in their views e.g. GUMG research; feminism – this theory states that the media industry is biased because it is still males that control the higher positions, influence content and determine the representations and tone of content – the media industry reinforces patriarchy; omission – it is claimed that the media regularly fails to cover stories in which large corporations have committed crimes or wrongdoings – this is biased; mass appeal – pluralists say that the media must appeal to as many people as possible and so will often ‘dumb down’ content to do so e.g. reality TV shows, soap operas etc. which typically reflect mainstream norms and values and ignore alternative viewpoints or representations – this is therefore biased; propaganda – this aims to influence the audience to believe a particular ideology and so is heavily biased in its content e.g. Disney war propaganda films and Stalin’s ‘visiting cinema’; censorship – this can be seen as a form of bias as it determines what can and cannot be included in media content e.g. UK Official Secrets Act, law of libel, obscenity etc.; ethnocentrism – the media is often accused of being culturally biased in its coverage of events and in its content; any other reasonable response. Band 0 [0 marks] No creditworthy response. Band 1 [1–3 marks] Answers in this band will show only a limited awareness of the question. A tendency to description is likely. Responses may be short and undeveloped and points stated without explanation. Sociological terms and concepts are unlikely to be used. At the bottom of the band (1 mark), expect one weak point. Higher in the band (2–3 marks), candidates may offer more than one weak point. 4(d) Band 2 [4–6 marks] Answers in this band will show basic sociological knowledge and understanding. Responses may be underdeveloped and lacking in range. At the bottom of the band, candidates are unlikely to use sociological terms and concepts accurately. Higher in the band, candidates may be beginning to use sociological terms and concepts with greater accuracy. However, some aspects of the answer may only be partially developed/explained. Band 3 [7–8 marks] Answers in this band will show good sociological knowledge and understanding and will be well-developed and explained. Sociological terms and concepts will be used accurately overall. Answers will be well-focused on the question and there will be a range of points presented. At the top of the band explanations will be clear throughout. 4(e) To what extent do the audience determine media content? 15 Possible answers: Arguments for: pluralism – the media reflects and responds to the needs of the audience therefore the audience shapes the media; uses and gratifications model – the audience choose what media to consume and what need it is to gratify, therefore media producers are led by this when producing content – meaning the audience are effectively determining content; independent media/narrowcasting – these specialist/niche producers would not exist if media content was not about the audience – the audience want this narrow, specialist content therefore it is provided; competition – each media company is in competition with the next to try and make maximum profits, therefore they will do everything they can to appeal to an audience; downfall – if a company fails to deliver what its audience wants then it will be driven out of business; choice – there are a range of platforms available today for the audience to consume media from, meaning that each can deliver to the audience what it demands e.g. influencers have developed to satisfy younger audience members demand on the internet; interactivity – new media is a two-way process and allows the audience to be directly involved with media content e.g. through forums, simulations, blogs, virtual worlds etc. (active audience models); user generated content – much of the media today is actually created by the audience: from citizen journalism to websites to vlogs to videos to short films – the youtube phenomenon; media campaigns – using digital technology these can quickly galvanise much audience support and can then lead to a change in media content e.g. #metoo campaign, #thisgirlcan etc.; any other reasonable response. 4(e) Arguments against: Marxism – a concentration of ownership of the media into the hands of a wealthy few means that media content is used to convey the dominant ideology and indoctrinate the masses – Miliband; diversion – the media’s content is centred around trivia, gossip and entertainment so as to divert the masses away from the wrongdoings of the elite and the inequalities of society; maintaining the status quo – traditional, conservative ideologies dominate media content with alternative views being either ridiculed or excluded: thus media content is not determined by the audience; propaganda – this has been used by many media outlets to control the masses e.g. North Korea, China, Nazi Germany – content is controlled and manipulated by the Government; gate-keepers – editors, journalists and producers control media content not the audience: they decide what we consume and what opinions we can hear/read; hegemony – media content is controlled by middle class, middle aged, white males who disseminate their world view to the audience therefore content is determined by their (narrow) views, opinions, choices and beliefs; patriarchy – the media is still primarily controlled by males and thus patriarchal and traditional representations and ideologies will be transmitted e.g. male gaze, female homemaker etc.; hypodermic syringe/cultural effects models – these media effects theories all believe that the audience are passive consumers of media who therefore can have no influence on media content; any other reasonable response. Band 0 [0 marks] No creditworthy response. Band 1 [1–4 marks] Answers in this band may be vague and largely based on common sense showing limited knowledge of the debate. Use of sociological terms or concepts is very unlikely. Responses may be short, undeveloped and one- sided. Lower in the band (1–2 marks), expect one or two weak points. Higher in the band (3–4 marks) candidates may offer more than two points and provide a weak definition of key terms in the question. Band 2 [5–8 marks] In this band candidates will show some basic knowledge of the debate. Alternatively, they may offer an answer which is list-like in nature but there will be no real attempt to assess the issues raised by the question. There may be limited/some use of sociological terms or concepts. Responses may be underdeveloped and lack range. Answers may be simplistic and two-sided or only cover one side of the debate. Lower in the band, the response may be rather narrow in the points covered and there may be some development. Higher in the band, more points are likely to be covered with some development. Alternatively, a list-like answer with some development covering both sides of the argument may score up to 8 marks. A one-sided answer cannot score higher than 8 marks. 4(e) Band 3 [9–12 marks] Answers in this band will show good sociological knowledge and understanding of the debate. Sociological terms and concepts will be used with greater accuracy and/or frequency. For the most part, answers will be well- developed, focused on the question and there will be a range of points presented. There will be a two-sided response but it may lack range on one side. At the bottom of the band, candidates may provide a narrower range of developed points. At the top of the band, expect a wider range of developed points and clear focus on the question. Band 4 [13–15 marks] Answers in this band will show excellent knowledge and understanding of the debate. There will be a strong grasp of the arguments as well as accurate and frequent use of sociological terms and concepts. Answers will be well- developed, clearly focused on the question and discuss a wide range of points. Responses will be two-sided and have a range of points on each side. At the bottom of the band (13 marks), the answer may lack a specific conclusion. Higher in the band, there will be a clear attempt to offer an assessment of the ‘To what extent?’ part of the question through a focused conclusion.
3 Surveillance is one way society tries to control acts of crime and deviance. Sociologists offer many explanations for why crime is committed, such as status frustration, Marxist theory and functionalist theory. However, these views do not explain why some sociologists argue that females commit less crime or how the actions of the police can lead to deviancy amplification. (a) What is meant by the term ‘status frustration’? [2] (b) Describe two types of surveillance used to control crime. [4] (c) Explain how deviancy amplification may be caused by the police. [6] (d) Explain why some females commit less crime than males. [8] (e) To what extent is Marxist theory the best explanation for why some individuals commit crime?[15] Section D: Media
35 marks
Mark scheme: 3(a) What is meant by the term ‘status frustration’? 2 One mark for a partial definition, e.g. feeling angry about your position. Two marks for a clear definition, e.g. when people are unable to achieve the socially approved goals because of their low position in society. 3(b) Describe two types of surveillance used to control crime. 4 Possible responses: • Telephone surveillance – monitoring phone calls/phone tapping; • Cameras – CCTV and other camera systems used to monitor areas and behaviour, increasingly common; • Computer surveillance – monitoring websites, emails, messages – can be by private companies or by the government; • Aerial surveillance – by helicopters, drones or satellites; • Tracking – people’s use of credit cards and other similar sources of information about people; • Social networking – monitoring people’s use of this in order to track interests, connections and interests; • Electronic – tagging of people, animals or goods e.g. as part of the formal social control system; • Police – through undercover operations often using false identities in order to monitor the behaviour of groups and prevent criminality; • Identity cards – used to track population, immigration, workers etc.; • Biometric – monitoring people for behaviour or traits that may indicate their emotional state or likely future behaviour; • Any other reasonable response. One mark for each point correctly identified (up to maximum of two). One mark for each point that is developed (up to a maximum of two). 3(c) Explain how deviancy amplification may be caused by the police. 6 Possible responses: • Labelling – Becker – police identify some social groups as ‘deviant’ and so target them meaning they are more likely to discover deviance/crime occurring; • master status – if labelled a deviant by the police then this may override all other status and becomes the way the individual sees themselves and how others see them – therefore they commit more crime; • self-fulfilling prophecy – living up to a criminal label can lead to a deviant career as the individual becomes increasingly detached from their friends and families, mixing instead in a deviant world and committing more deviance; • stop and search rates – some social groups are more likely than others to be stopped and searched by the police which can breed resentment and resistance – through this more deviance can occur e.g. scuffles with the police; • Cohen – mods and rockers – this case study demonstrates how deviancy amplification can occur because of the actions of the police towards a social group; • drug users – studies by Young (UK) and Becker (USA) show how the police actions towards illegal drug use can make the deviant behaviour worse and more prolific – deviancy amplification; • any other reasonable response. Band 0 [0 marks] No creditworthy response. Band 1 [1–3 marks] Answers in this band will show only a limited awareness of the question. Responses may be short and un/underdeveloped. At the bottom of the band (1 mark), expect one weak point. Higher in the band (2–3 marks), candidates may offer more than one weak point, but there may be a tendency towards simplistic answers, engaging with sociological ideas without using sociological language. Band 2 [4–6 marks] Answers in this band will have clear and accurate explanation, showing good sociological knowledge and understanding. Sociological terms and concepts should be expected and explained. At the bottom of the band, the range of points covered may be narrow or lack detail. Higher in the band, answers will cover more than one point in a well-developed way or cover several points in less detail. 3(d) Explain why some females commit less crime than males. 8 Possible responses: • Pollak – female criminality is higher than the official crime rates suggest – women get away with crime more than men due to factors such as the chivalry thesis therefore they only appear to commit less crime; • differential gender socialisation – Parsons – females are more likely to have a home-centred adolescence than males and have been taught to be more passive whereas boys are socialised to be more aggressive; • fewer opportunities – in many cultures females spend a lot of their time at home, often with childcare responsibilities – even when they are at work they are less likely than men to be in a situation to commit serious white-collar crime; • social control – females are more socially controlled than males therefore have less chance to commit crime e.g. curfews, staying in at night etc.; • Messerschmidt – ‘doing masculinity’ – females are not socialised into masculine values which many sociologists believe are similar to criminal values, therefore their crime rates are lower; • peer pressure – evidence shows that boys are more susceptible to this than girls and that they are more likely to fall into deviant groups such as gangs and anti-school sub-cultures where criminal and/or deviant behaviour is normalised; • any other reasonable response. Band 0 [0 marks] No creditworthy response. Band 1 [1–3 marks] Answers in this band will show only a limited awareness of the question. A tendency to description is likely. Responses may be short and undeveloped and points stated without explanation. Sociological terms and concepts are unlikely to be used. At the bottom of the band (1 mark), expect one weak point. Higher in the band (2–3 marks), candidates may offer more than one weak point. Band 2 [4–6 marks] Answers in this band will show basic sociological knowledge and understanding. Responses maybe underdeveloped and lacking in range. At the bottom of the band, candidates are unlikely to use sociological terms and concepts accurately. Higher in the band, candidates may be beginning to use sociological terms and concepts with greater accuracy. However, some aspects of the answer may only be partially developed/explained. Band 3 [7–8 marks] Answers in this band will show good sociological knowledge and understanding and will be well-developed and explained. Sociological terms and concepts will be used accurately overall. Answers will be well-focused on the question and there will be a range of points presented. At the top of the band explanations will be clear throughout. 3(e) To what extent is Marxist theory the best explanation for why some 15 individuals commit crime? Possible responses: Arguments for: • laws reflect ruling class interests – laws criminalise the actions of the working class whilst protecting the ruling class; • material deprivation – a lack of money and resources leads to crime; • relative deprivation – it is not a lack of money that leads to crime but the feeling of being deprived when compared to others which breeds resentment e.g. minority ethnic group disadvantage and racism; • marginalisation – Lea and Young – when a social group does not have organisations or representatives to protect their interests so they have no outlet for their feelings of anger other than violence, crime and riots e.g. London riots 2011; • Neo-Marxism and ‘resistance’ – crime and deviance spring out of a social groups refusal to bow to ruling class power and authority e.g. the working class rebellion of the Skins or the Punks; • capitalism and crime – capitalism breeds greed and selfishness and therefore crime is an inevitable by-product of this system: this explains crime through all social classes e.g. also explains white-collar crime; • consumer society – the pressure to buy and consume material goods is exacerbated in contemporary media saturated societies and for those who cannot afford this crime may be the result; • any other reasonable response. Arguments against: • functionalism – Durkheim – criminals perform a useful social function as they reinforce to others where the boundaries of acceptable behaviour lie, so reinforcing shared norms and values; • Merton’s strain theory – anomie – when society has a disparity between goals and means then this can lead individuals to commit crime; • Cohen’s status frustration – young working-class males in particular suffer from this as they face disadvantages and inequalities in society that causes them to commit acts of crime and deviance; • inadequate socialisation – New Right sociologists such as Murray believe that there is a link between poor parenting and criminal behaviour; • labelling theory – Becker – those people who are labelled as criminal can live up to this label through a self-fulfilling prophecy and adopt a deviant career; • feminism – masculinity – feminists believe that males are brought up to be hegemonic masculine males and criminality is just an extension of this – indeed aggressive behaviour is often encouraged in boys; • postmodernism – these sociologists believe that much crime is committed largely for the thrills and the excitement (Katz, Lyng etc.); • any other reasonable response. 3(e) Band 0 [0 marks] No creditworthy response. Band 1 [1–4 marks] Answers in this band may be vague and largely based on common sense showing limited knowledge of the debate. Use of sociological terms or concepts is very unlikely. Responses may be short, undeveloped and one- sided. Lower in the band (1–2 marks), expect one or two weak points. Higher in the band (3–4 marks) candidates may offer more than two points and provide a weak definition of key terms in the question. Band 2 [5–8 marks] In this band candidates will show some basic knowledge of the debate. Alternatively, they may offer an answer which is list-like in nature but there will be no real attempt to assess the issues raised by the question. There may be limited/some use of sociological terms or concepts. Responses may be underdeveloped and lack range. Answers may be simplistic and two- sided or only cover one side of the debate. Lower in the band, the response may be rather narrow in the points covered and there may be some development. Higher in the band, more points are likely to be covered with some development. Alternatively, a list-like answer with some development covering both sides of the argument may score up to 8 marks. A one-sided answer cannot score higher than 8 marks. Band 3 [9–12 marks] Answers in this band will show good sociological knowledge and understanding of the debate. Sociological terms and concepts will be used with greater accuracy and/or frequency. For the most part, answers will be well-developed, focused on the question and there will be a range of points presented. There will be a two-sided response but it may lack range on one side. At the bottom of the band, candidates may provide a narrower range of developed points. At the top of the band, expect a wider range of developed points and clear focus on the question. Band 4 [13–15 marks] Answers in this band will show excellent knowledge and understanding of the debate. There will be a strong grasp of the arguments as well as accurate and frequent use of sociological terms and concepts. Answers will be well-developed, clearly focused on the question and discuss a wide range of points. Responses will be two-sided and have a range of points on each side. At the bottom of the band (13 marks), the answer may lack a specific conclusion. Higher in the band, there will be a clear attempt to offer an assessment of the ‘To what extent.?’ part of the question through a focused conclusion.
3 The judicial system deals with a wide range of crimes such as murder, assault, internet crimes and petty crimes. Some sociologists argue that prisons are the best way to prevent and control crime. The official crime statistics suggest that there is a problem with crime in society. Victim surveys also show that crime is a problem but they measure it differently. (a) What is meant by the term ‘judicial system’? [2] (b) Describe two internet crimes. [4] (c) Explain how courts deal with the problem of crime. [6] (d) Explain why victim surveys can be criticised. [8] (e) To what extent do prisons prevent crime? [15] Section D: Media
35 marks
Mark scheme: 3(a) What is meant by the term ‘judicial system’? 2 One mark for a partial definition e.g. the courts OR an agency of formal social control. Two marks for a clear definition, e.g. the court system where laws are applied/punishments are given. 3(b) Describe two internet crimes. 4 Possible responses: • Computer – spreading computer viruses and malware to damage systems and networks; • Theft – fraud and identity theft online; • Scams – internet scams that aim to take money from people through false information; • Harassment – online stalking, hate crime, catfishing, trolling or cyber- bullying leading to mental/emotional harm of an individual; • Trade – using the internet to trade in illegal goods and drugs, often through the dark web e.g. arms trafficking; • Cyberterrorism – internet is used for deliberate, widespread attacks on computers and computer networks e.g. hacking into a government website; • any other reasonable response. One mark for each point correctly identified (up to a maximum of two). One mark for each point that is developed (up to a maximum of two). 3(c) Explain how courts deal with the problem of crime. 6 Possible responses: • formally – the courts are a formal agent of social control and use standardised rules and procedures to decide on innocence or guilt; • punishment – the courts can impose punishments for those found guilty e.g. incarceration, fine, community service; • cases – the courts try those cases brought forward for prosecution, and assess the evidence presented by lawyers; • types of courts – magistrate (more trivial) and crown (more serious) courts deal with different types of crimes and offer punishments in line with these; • deterrence – harsh prison sentences can be given by the courts to deter others from committing crime; • rehabilitation – the courts issue punishments that aim to change the attitudes and behaviour of the criminals through community sentencing, education, rehab and training; • restorative justice – involving the offender and the victim meeting so the offender can pay their victim back if appropriate and apologise – victims are thus involved in the legal process; • media – court cases are reported in the media and this serves to reinforce what behaviour is considered acceptable in society, it can also act as a form of deterrence to crime for the audience; • any other reasonable response. Band 0 [0 marks] No creditworthy response. Band 1 [1–3 marks] Answers in this band will show only a limited awareness of the question. Responses may be short and un/underdeveloped. At the bottom of the band (1 mark), expect one weak point. Higher in the band (2–3 marks), candidates may offer more than one weak point, but there may be a tendency towards simplistic answers, engaging with sociological ideas without using sociological language. Band 2 [4–6 marks] Answers in this band will have clear and accurate explanation, showing good sociological knowledge and understanding. Sociological terms and concepts should be expected and explained. At the bottom of the band, the range of points covered may be narrow or lack detail. Higher in the band, answers will cover more than one point in a well-developed way or cover several points in less detail. 3(d) Explain why victim surveys can be criticised. 8 Possible responses: • sampling – victim surveys only ask a small sample of people and thus the answers are unlikely to be representative for most people’s experiences; • not all crimes are covered – they do not cover victimless crimes e.g. drug use or crimes against businesses/organisations. The picture of crime revealed is therefore skewed; • crimes against children – these are unlikely to be uncovered as children are not often respondents in these surveys; • sexual offences – these types of crimes are still very under-reported in victim surveys due to shame and embarrassment; • memory issues – victim surveys rely on the memories of victims which are notoriously unreliable – things can be forgotten or exaggerated; • lying – victim surveys cannot detect whether a respondent is lying as there are no cross-checks therefore the accuracy is unknown; • official statistics – these are a better method than victim surveys because they are validated figures from the government; • self-report studies – these are better because ‘victimless’ crimes can be covered (e.g. speeding or drug use) which victim surveys would not cover; • any other reasonable response. Band 0 [0 marks] No creditworthy response. Band 1 [1–3 marks] Answers in this band will show only a limited awareness of the question. A tendency to description is likely. Responses may be short and undeveloped and points stated without explanation. Sociological terms and concepts are unlikely to be used. At the bottom of the band (1 mark), expect one weak point. Higher in the band (2–3 marks), candidates may offer more than one weak point. Band 2 [4–6 marks] Answers in this band will show basic sociological knowledge and understanding. Responses may be underdeveloped and lacking in range. At the bottom of the band, candidates are unlikely to use sociological terms and concepts accurately. Higher in the band, candidates may be beginning to use sociological terms and concepts with greater accuracy. However, some aspects of the answer may only be partially developed/explained. Band 3 [7–8 marks] Answers in this band will show good sociological knowledge and understanding and will be well-developed and explained. Sociological terms and concepts will be used accurately overall. Answers will be well-focused on the question and there will be a range of points presented. At the top of the band explanations will be clear throughout. 3(e) To what extent do prisons prevent crime? 15 Possible responses: Arguments for: • public safety – crime is prevented as criminals are locked away from society thus keeping the public safe; • deterrence – offenders are deterred from committing crime by the thought of going to prison thus preventing crime; • rehabilitation – rehab programmes and counselling are offered within prisons to give inmates alternatives to crime for the future; • education and training – prisoners can up-skill themselves whilst inside, gaining qualifications and work-based training which will all help them to secure jobs when released, so preventing crime; • work and responsibilities – in prison offenders learn that they are expected to work for their privileges and to take responsibility for their actions – this makes them better equipped to avoid crime once released back into society; • fear factor – prisoners are often afraid and fearful once inside a jail from the threat of attack and assault and thus will not commit crime when they are released as they are too scared to return; • social conformity – prisons force inmates to conform to authority and this socialisation can translate to the outside world on release, so preventing further crime form being committed; • any other reasonable response. Arguments against: • informal social control – prisons can never be effective at preventing crime if the individuals’ prior socialisation has not been effective; • university of crime – this is how prison is described by some. The idea that prisoners just learn how to be better criminals whilst they are locked away meaning prisons will not prevent further crimes; • crime within prisons – this is rife with bullying, assaults, drug dealing and physical attacks being a daily occurrence in most prisons; • re-offending rate – research indicates that most prisoners return to prison after they have been released – they continue to commit crime showing that prisons do not prevent it; • crimes not prosecuted – the prison system can only prevent crime if the criminals are behind bars – most criminals are never caught, particularly domestic abuse and corporate criminals; • gang crime – this is said to continue within prison with much rivalry, competition and violence occurring; • harsher punishments – some believe that the only way to prevent crime is to have harsher punishments available e.g. exile, the death penalty etc.; • labels and stereotypes (Becker) – prisons don’t prevent crime as once an individual has been labelled as a ‘criminal’ or an ‘ex-con’ they are stigmatised and often unable to get employment, meaning turning to crime and returning to prison becomes more likely; • any other reasonable response. Band 0 [0 marks] No creditworthy response. 3(e) Band 1 [1–4 marks] Answers in this band may be vague and largely based on common sense showing limited knowledge of the debate. Use of sociological terms or concepts is very unlikely. Responses may be short, undeveloped and one- sided. Lower in the band (1–2 marks), expect one or two weak points. Higher in the band (3–4 marks) candidates may offer more than two points and provide a weak definition of key terms in the question. Band 2 [5–8 marks] In this band candidates will show some basic knowledge of the debate. Alternatively, they may offer an answer which is list-like in nature but there will be no real attempt to assess the issues raised by the question. There may be limited/some use of sociological terms or concepts. Responses may be underdeveloped and lack range. Answers may be simplistic and two-sided or only cover one side of the debate. Lower in the band, the response may be rather narrow in the points covered and there may be some development. Higher in the band, more points are likely to be covered with some development. Alternatively, a list-like answer with some development covering both sides of the argument may score up to 8 marks. A one-sided answer cannot score higher than 8 marks. Band 3 [9–12 marks] Answers in this band will show good sociological knowledge and understanding of the debate. Sociological terms and concepts will be used with greater accuracy and/or frequency. For the most part, answers will be well-developed, focused on the questions and there will be a range of points presented. There will be a two-sided response but it may lack range on one side. At the bottom of the band, candidates may provide a narrower range of developed points. At the top of the band, expect a wider range of developed points and clear focus on the question. Band 4 [13–15 marks] Answers in this band will show excellent knowledge and understanding of the debate. There will be a strong grasp of the arguments as well as accurate and frequent use of sociological terms and concepts. Answers will be well-developed, clearly focused on the question and discuss a wide range of points. Responses will be two-sided and have a range of points on each side. At the bottom of the band (13 marks), the answer may lack a specific conclusion. Higher in the band, there will be a clear attempt to offer an assessment of the ‘To what extent.?’ part of the question through a focused conclusion.
2 Functionalists believe education is a meritocracy. However, not all sociologists agree with this view, as cultural capital and material factors can often benefit some students more than others. Labelling by teachers can also affect educational achievement and experiences of school, as well as whether a student joins an anti-school sub-culture. Education is therefore an important agent of secondary socialisation. (a) What is meant by the term ‘meritocracy’? [2] (b) Describe two examples of cultural capital that can positively affect educational achievement. [4] (c) Explain how anti-school sub-cultures challenge authority. [6] (d) Explain why labelling by teachers can affect students’ experiences of education. [8] (e) To what extent is education a successful agent of socialisation? [15] Section C: Crime, deviance and social control
35 marks
Mark scheme: 2(a) What is meant by the term ‘meritocracy’? 2 One mark for a partial definition, e.g. a fair system. Two marks for a clear definition, e.g. a system where individuals reach the social positions they deserve based on achievements, skills and talents. 2(b) Describe two examples of cultural capital that can positively affect 4 educational achievement. Possible responses: • Literacy – those with more cultural capital are able to familiarise their children with books and reading in the home which then benefits the children in school and in their learning; • Value of education – those with more cultural capital are able to imbue their children with a sense of the importance of education and thus encourage more focus and hard work when at school; • Deferred gratification – cultural capital helps children to see the long- term goals and aims of education and thus encourages children to stay in education for longer and to sacrifice short-term pleasures to focus on their studies; • Visits and foreign holidays – those with cultural capital will include visits to galleries, theatre, museums, foreign holidays etc. into their child’s upbringing thus normalising these things in schools and so making accessibility and understanding easier; • Role models – those with cultural capital are more likely to have been successful in education themselves and so can inspire and encourage their own children to similarly be successful; • Teacher labelling – those with high cultural capital, possessing the middle class traits and values so treasured in schools, are more likely to be looked upon favourably by teachers who will expect more from them; • Knowledge of education – those with cultural capital understand how the education system works and so are more likely to have contact with schools and teachers and to push for extra support for their children; • Any other reasonable response. One mark for each point correctly identified (up to a maximum of two). One mark for each point that is developed (up to a maximum of two). 2(c) Explain how anti-school sub-cultures challenge authority. 6 Possible responses: • Willis ‘the lads’ – these working class boys came to school to ‘have a laugh’. They enjoyed breaking the school rules and annoying the teachers; • values – they do not value education or school, in fact they hate it and therefore do not conform to the rules; • attitude to school work – they avoid completing work and will try to cheat if they are made to work, so challenging teacher authority; • attendance – their attendance is not good and they will truant lessons, refusing to conform; • prejudice – they are often openly racist, sexist and homophobic which goes against most school policies and expectations; • delinquency – they are often involved in criminal behaviour outside school and thus have little respect for authority generally; • aggression – the sub-culture is often closely linked to the culture of masculinity and so can be violent and insolent towards those in positions of authority i.e. teachers; • other pupils – the sub-culture is extremely negative to those students who do conform to authority and will often bully or be violent towards them to demonstrate this; • any other reasonable response. Band 0 [0 marks] No creditworthy response. Band 1 [1–3 marks] Answers in this band will show only a limited awareness of the question. Responses may be short and un/underdeveloped. At the bottom of the band (1 mark), expect one weak point. Higher in the band (2–3 marks), candidates may offer more than one weak point, but there may be a tendency towards simplistic answers, engaging with sociological ideas without using sociological language. Band 2 [4–6 marks] Answers in this band will have clear and accurate explanation, showing good sociological knowledge and understanding. Sociological terms and concepts should be expected and explained. At the bottom of the band, the range of points covered may be narrow or lack detail. Higher in the band, answers will cover more than one point in a well-developed way or cover several points in less detail. 2(d) Explain why labelling by teachers can affect students’ experiences of 8 education. Possible responses: • labelling theory – Becker – teachers judge students on non-academic factors such as speech, dress, enthusiasm and manners – these combine to make up a teacher’s stereotype of the ‘ideal pupil’ and influences the teacher’s assessment of their ability; • self-fulfilling prophecy – teachers expectations of students are likely to bring their own self-image of ability into line with the teachers e.g. those who are told they are bright are more likely to be bright; • Rosenthal and Jacobson – a randomly chosen group of students whom teachers were told were bright but who actually were no different to the other students did make more progress than the students who were not labelled as bright; • streaming and setting – based on pupils predicted ability – those in the higher groups become confident high achievers, those at the bottom will see themselves as failures and struggle to do well; • halo effect – the expectations a teacher has of a student can positively increase student performance levels; • ethnicity – teachers may have different expectations of different ethnic groups which may affect educational achievement e.g. Archer found teachers had high expectations of Chinese students, Afro-Caribbean students more negatively labelled; • gender – boys are more likely to be seen as problems (some schools have single sex lessons) which may negatively affect their achievement; • any other reasonable response. Band 0 [0 marks] No creditworthy response. Band 1 [1–3 marks] Answers in this band will show only a limited awareness of the question. A tendency to description is likely. Responses may be short and undeveloped and points stated without explanation. Sociological terms and concepts are unlikely to be used. At the bottom of the band (1 mark), expect one weak point. Higher in the band (2–3 marks), candidates may offer more than one weak point. Band 2 [4–6 marks] Answers in this band will show basic sociological knowledge and understanding. Responses maybe underdeveloped and lacking in range. At the bottom of the band, candidates are unlikely to use sociological terms and concepts accurately. Higher in the band, candidates may be beginning to use sociological terms and concepts with greater accuracy. However, some aspects of the answer may only be partially developed/explained. Band 3 [7–8 marks] Answers in this band will show good sociological knowledge and understanding and will be well-developed and explained. Sociological terms and concepts will be used accurately overall. Answers will be well- focused on the question and there will be a range of points presented. At the top of the band explanations will be clear throughout 2(e) To what extent is education a successful agent of socialisation? 15 Possible responses: Arguments for: • functionalism – one of the main functions of education is to continue the socialisation that has begun in the family to ensure students learn and accept society’s norms and values; • authority – having teachers in positions of authority able to use rewards and sanctions enables the socialisation process to be carried out effectively; • shared values – schools can promote a value consensus and thus create a sense of belonging to one’s culture and society in students; • patriotism – education can encourage and internalise a national identity and pride through things such as singing the national anthem, learning about your culture, flying the national flag; • hidden curriculum – students learn not only a formal curriculum at school but also the expectations of how they should behave and think; • role allocation (sifting and sorting) – schools effectively socialise students to accept the role that they are best suited to; • Marxism – schools effectively socialise students to do as they are told and submit to authority thus creating a submissive workforce, perfect for the ruling class elite; • feminism – schools effectively socialise students to accept their society’s gendered expectations of them e.g. that boys are more active and strong and girls more passive and conformist – this maintains Parsons ideal gender roles of female ‘expressive’ and male ‘instrumental’ that are said to make society function best; • any other reasonable response. Arguments against: • self-negating prophecy – students do not have to conform to the expectations schools, teachers or families have of them; • anti-school sub-cultures – the existence of these within schools demonstrates that not all students conform to the expectations and rules and so have not been successfully socialised; • Marxism – schools are not successful in socialising their students as they are just another tool for the ruling class to oppress and indoctrinate the working class into submission and obedience; • feminism – schools are not effective in their socialisation as they promote a culture of patriarchy which limits the life chances of females; • other agencies – education may be part of the socialisation process but some sociologists may question whether it is as successful as, say, media or family in its socialisation of young people; • social control – it may not be effective socialisation that makes students conform in school but instead the fear of sanctions – this is more about coercion; • multi-culturalism – is there one culture that students can be socialised into any longer? Factors such as an ethnocentric curriculum demonstrate the problems of socialisation within schools; • any other reasonable response. 2(e) Band 0 [0 marks] No creditworthy response. Band 1 [1–4 marks] Answers in this band may be vague and largely based on common sense showing limited knowledge of the debate. Use of sociological terms or concepts is very unlikely. Responses may be short, undeveloped and one- sided. Lower in the band (1–2 marks), expect one or two weak points. Higher in the band (3–4 marks) candidates may offer more than two points and provide a weak definition of key terms in the question. Band 2 [5–8 marks] In this band candidates will show some basic knowledge of the debate. Alternatively, they may offer an answer which is list-like in nature but there will be no real attempt to assess the issues raised by the question. There may be limited/some use of sociological terms or concepts. Responses may be underdeveloped and lack range. Answers may be simplistic and two- sided or only cover one side of the debate. Lower in the band, the response may be rather narrow in the points covered and there may be some development. Higher in the band, more points are likely to be covered with some development. Alternatively, a list-like answer with some development covering both sides of the argument may score up to 8 marks. A one-sided answer cannot score higher than 8 marks. Band 3 [9–12 marks] Answers in this band will show good sociological knowledge and understanding of the debate. Sociological terms and concepts will be used with greater accuracy and/or frequency. For the most part, answers will be well-developed, focused on the question and there will be a range of points presented. There will be a two-sided response but it may lack range on one side. At the bottom of the band, candidates may provide a narrower range of developed points. At the top of the band, expect a wider range of developed points and clear focus on the question. Band 4 [13–15 marks] Answers in this band will show excellent knowledge and understanding of the debate. There will be a strong grasp of the arguments as well as accurate and frequent use of sociological terms and concepts. Answers will be well-developed, clearly focused on the question and discuss a wide range of points. Responses will be two-sided and have a range of points on each side. At the bottom of the band (13 marks), the answer may lack a specific conclusion. Higher in the band, there will be a clear attempt to offer an assessment of the ‘To what extent.?’ part of the question through a focused conclusion.
3 In most societies the police are employed to control and prevent crime by using a range of sanctions and strategies. Despite this, people who commit corporate crimes are often not prosecuted. Also, according to official crime statistics and self-report studies, females are less likely than males to commit crime. However, not all sociologists believe that self-report studies are accurate. (a) What is meant by the term ‘sanctions’? [2] (b) Describe two problems with using self-report studies to find out how much crime is committed. [4] (c) Explain how agencies of social control can prevent females from committing crimes. [6] (d) Explain why people who commit corporate crimes are often not prosecuted. [8] (e) To what extent are the police effective in controlling crime? [15] Section D: Media
35 marks
Mark scheme: 3(a) What is meant by the term ‘sanctions’? 2 One mark for a partial definition, e.g. a prison sentence. Two marks for a clear definition, e.g. punishment or penalties for behaviour not conforming to norms and values. 3(b) Describe two problems with using self-report studies to find out how 4 much crime is committed. Possible responses: • Validity – how certain can the researcher be that people have told the truth about the amount of crime committed e.g. exaggerating what they have done or not admitting to crimes; • Representativeness – many self-report studies are administered to adolescents which means not all crimes committed are covered e.g. corporate and white-collar crimes; • Generalisability – due to the issues with self-report studies not being representative the results from them cannot be generalised therefore many sociologists question how useful they really are; • Relevance – a lot of self-report studies ask about quite trivial crimes e.g. not paying fares on public transport, therefore they may test honesty more than criminality; • Gender – self-report studies question whether men really are much more likely than women to engage in criminal behaviour but many sociologists believe this may be due to the focus on more trivial crimes and acts of deviance rather than female criminality; • Age – self-report studies are often used with youths who may experience peer pressure to exaggerate their criminality in order to maintain their status and image with their peers; • Any other reasonable response. One mark for each point correctly identified (up to a maximum of two). One mark for each point that is developed (up to a maximum of two). 3(c) Explain how agencies of social control can prevent females from 6 committing crimes. Possible responses: • parental curfews/rules – girls are typically given earlier curfews and may not be allowed outside alone, this makes committing crime more difficult; • differential gendered socialisation – Oakley – boys and girls are socialised very differently, girls to be passive and gentle, boys to be active and tough – this effectively controls females not to commit crime e.g. canalisation; • workplace – men and women typically work in very different jobs thus women have far less access to employment that would make white- collar/corporate crime easier; • education – hidden curriculum – females learn their gender expectations and roles through the norms and values that are encouraged at school and this effectively controls them to not commit crime; • media – the media demonises female criminals e.g. Myra Hindley and thus deters females from committing crime for fear of the consequences and negative public labels; • peer group – female peer groups tend to be more pro-school and conformist than males and therefore studying hard and working towards legal goals and deferred gratification are encouraged – this reduces levels of criminality; • prisons – can incarcerate females and separate them from their family, meaning they are temporarily unable to commit crime; • any other reasonable response. Band 0 [0 marks] No creditworthy response. Band 1 [1–3 marks] Answers in this band will show only a limited awareness of the question. Responses may be short and un/underdeveloped. At the bottom of the band (1 mark), expect one weak point. Higher in the band (2–3 marks), candidates may offer more than one weak point, but there may be a tendency towards simplistic answers, engaging with sociological ideas without using sociological language. Band 2 [4–6 marks] Answers in this band will have clear and accurate explanation, showing good sociological knowledge and understanding. Sociological terms and concepts should be expected and explained. At the bottom of the band, the range of points covered may be narrow or lack detail. Higher in the band, answers will cover more than one point in a well developed way or cover several points in less detail. 3(d) Explain why people who commit corporate crimes are often not 8 prosecuted. Possible responses: • recording rates – these types of crimes are less likely to be reported to the authorities and so are rarely prosecuted; • stereotypical offenders – corporate criminals do not match the stereotypes held by the police of the typical offender (Cicourel) and therefore individuals are more likely to get away with crimes; • avoiding publicity – prosecutions for corporate crimes are less likely as companies want to avoid negative publicity that a criminal investigation would lead to therefore the perpetrators are often not prosecuted; • ruling class definitions – crime is defined by the ruling class and therefore many actions of the ruling class are not defined as crimes – if they are they are usually dealt with less severely than working class crimes meaning prosecution rates are less; • health and safety breaches – Tombs and Whyte – only 5% of these are investigated by the police therefore prosecutions are very rare; • multinational corporations’ power – in cases that attract media/public attention, one employee often takes the blame for the crime (is scapegoated) while the company itself is not charged – prosecutions of all those involved are therefore unlikely; • power – those committing corporate crime are often part of the powerful elite with much social and economic capital (Bourdieu) – social networks can thus be used in order to negotiate justice and avoid prosecution; • any other reasonable response. Band 0 [0 marks] No creditworthy response. Band 1 [1–3 marks] Answers in this band will show only a limited awareness of the question. A tendency to description is likely. Responses may be short and undeveloped and points stated without explanation. Sociological terms and concepts are unlikely to be used. At the bottom of the band (1 mark), expect one weak point. Higher in the band (2–3 marks), candidates may offer more than one weak point. Band 2 [4–6 marks] Answers in this band will show basic sociological knowledge and understanding. Responses maybe underdeveloped and lacking in range. At the bottom of the band, candidates are unlikely to use sociological terms and concepts accurately. Higher in the band, candidates may be beginning to use sociological terms and concepts with greater accuracy. However, some aspects of the answer may only be partially developed/explained. Band 3 [7–8 marks] Answers in this band will show good sociological knowledge and understanding and will be well-developed and explained. Sociological terms and concepts will be used accurately overall. Answers will be well- focused on the question and there will be a range of points presented. At the top of the band explanations will be clear throughout. 3(e) To what extent are the police effective in controlling crime? 15 Possible responses: Arguments for: • police presence – this deters criminals and keeps residents safe; • Marxists – police control crime effectively to benefit the ruling class as they are often used to control protests and demonstrations; • military policing – this is effective as the fear of force and weaponry keeps social order in urban areas; • community policing – working with and alongside members of the public is effective as the public trust and will report information to the police; • international cooperation – policing across borders is increasingly effective as police forces in different countries use digital technology to work together in the fight against crime; • surveillance – the police use surveillance in order to improve their effectiveness at controlling crime e.g. CCTV, ICT monitoring and tracking, undercover work, tracking credit cards etc.; • zero tolerance policing – the police acted against minor offences to send out the message that no form of criminality would be accepted in the community – this has seen big drops in the crime rate; • functionalism – the police help to maintain social solidarity and social order through upholding the law; • specialist units – the police have developed their teams to be more specialist in many areas which has meant more successful and effective policing takes place e.g. sexual crimes, gangs, drugs, paedophilia etc.; • any other reasonable response. Arguments against: • stereotypes, typical offender (Cicourel) – the police label certain social groups as more likely to be criminal than others and target these groups. This means others are able to get away with crime; • institutional racism – the McPherson Report identified that racist practices and assumptions run through the police force so minority ethnic groups are more likely to be arrested/prosecuted than others; • Pollak – chivalry thesis – some sociologists believe that women are able to get away with crime as they are not perceived as capable of many types of crimes; • deviancy amplification – actions of the police e.g. stop and search, BLM protests, may lead to resentment and behaviour the police can define as criminal; • the dark figure of crime – research shows that most criminals get away with their crimes and are not prosecuted, this is not effectively controlling crime; • feminism – victims of abuse and sexual attacks – these victims would not see the police as effective as it has been shown that convictions are few and far between; • Marxism – resistance – e.g. the London Riots 2011, Egyptian protests 2013, global BLM protests 2020/2021 – the police are not effective at controlling crime as instead of focusing on serious criminals they focus on activism/protest movements, causing social unrest and increasing social injustices rather than preventing crime; 3(e) • state crimes – the police are not effective at preventing these crimes as they are seen to be ‘tools of the state’ and thus legitimatise the horrific crimes e.g. war crimes, genocide etc.; • crimes by the police – the police themselves commit crimes and police who do commit crimes are rarely prosecuted; • any other reasonable response. Band 0 [0 marks] No creditworthy response. Band 1 [1–4 marks] Answers in this band may be vague and largely based on common sense showing limited knowledge of the debate. Use of sociological terms or concepts is very unlikely. Responses may be short, undeveloped and one- sided. Lower in the band (1–2 marks), expect one or two weak points. Higher in the band (3–4 marks) candidates may offer more than two points and provide a weak definition of key terms in the question. Band 2 [5–8 marks] In this band candidates will show some basic knowledge of the debate. Alternatively, they may offer an answer which is list-like in nature but there will be no real attempt to assess the issues raised by the question. There may be limited/some use of sociological terms or concepts. Responses may be underdeveloped and lack range. Answers may be simplistic and two- sided or only cover one side of the debate. Lower in the band, the response may be rather narrow in the points covered and there may be some development. Higher in the band, more points are likely to be covered with some development. Alternatively, a list-like answer with some development covering both sides of the argument may score up to 8 marks. A one-sided answer cannot score higher than 8 marks. Band 3 [9–12 marks] Answers in this band will show good sociological knowledge and understanding of the debate. Sociological terms and concepts will be used with greater accuracy and/or frequency. For the most part, answers will be well-developed, focused on the question and there will be a range of points presented. There will be a two-sided response but it may lack range on one side. At the bottom of the band, candidates may provide a narrower range of developed points. At the top of the band, expect a wider range of developed points and clear focus on the question. Band 4 [13–15 marks] Answers in this band will show excellent knowledge and understanding of the debate. There will be a strong grasp of the arguments as well as accurate and frequent use of sociological terms and concepts. Answers will be well-developed, clearly focused on the question and discuss a wide range of points. Responses will be two-sided and have a range of points on each side. At the bottom of the band (13 marks), the answer may lack a specific conclusion. Higher in the band, there will be a clear attempt to offer an assessment of the ‘To what extent.?’ part of the question through a focused conclusion.
4 Some sociologists argue that there are now more positive media representations of gender, age and disability. However, not all sociologists are so positive, for example Marxists are particularly critical of traditional media. Other sociologists criticise the amount of violence in the media and the effects this violence can have on society. Despite this, all sociologists agree that we now live in a media culture. (a) What is meant by the term ‘media culture’? [2] (b) Describe two examples of traditional media. [4] (c) Explain how media representations of disability are now more positive. [6] (d) Explain why Marxists criticise media content. [8] (e) To what extent is violence in society caused by violence in the media? [15]
35 marks
Mark scheme: 4(a) What is meant by the term ‘media culture’? 2 One mark for a partial definition, e.g. media is all around us, everywhere. Two marks for a clear definition, e.g. how a society is influenced and affected by the media, in terms of knowledge, tastes and values. 4(b) Describe two examples of traditional media. 4 Possible responses: • Newspapers – print products that cover the news, may be national, regional or local and can be published weekly or daily; • TV – mainstream broadcasting will dominate here with a range of programmes at a scheduled time usually intended for a national audience – current affairs, drama, sport, news and entertainment; • Radio – an audio medium with shows scheduled for specific time slots that broadcast music, news, sport and entertainment; • Books – printed fiction and non-fiction, the oldest form of mass media; • Magazines – print products that can be weekly or glossy monthly’s, often appealing to a specific target audience e.g. housewives; • Films – distributed to cinemas, DVD and TV; • Advertising – billboards, posters and space in print products aiming to persuade an audience to buy a particular product; • Any other reasonable response. One mark for each point correctly identified (up to a maximum of two). One mark for each point that is developed (up to a maximum of two). 4(c) Explain how media representations of disability are now more positive. 6 Possible responses: • visibility – there are a lot more disabled individuals now seen across the media industry which is a positive change; • reduced tokenism – this has been much reduced, meaning that disabled actors/individuals feature in the media today because of their abilities and/or actions; • fewer stereotypes – stereotypes of disabled people are far less frequently seen in the media today as we see more well-rounded and less one-dimensional, generalised characters; • less binary opposition – the media industry is using this technique less and less when it comes to representations of disability and instead disabled characters and individuals are represented on a sliding scale, as is the case for able bodied characters; • legislation – laws have changed e.g. The Equality Act and the media industry has followed in their codes of practice to ensure that disabled people have the same rights as able bodied; • language – the language used in the media to describe disabled people has become much less loaded; • success – successful disabled people now regularly feature in the media and are stars/celebrities e.g. Ade Adepitan, Ellie Simmonds, Lost Voice Guy, Warwick Davis etc.; • new media texts – a selection of new media output has changed representations of disability to being far more positive e.g. BBC ‘Beyond Boundaries, ABC’s Speechless’; • new and social media – these have given disabled people a voice and allow for the discussion of representations of disability and the ability to challenge the industry if content is not deemed acceptable; • any other reasonable response. Band 0 [0 marks] No creditworthy response. Band 1 [1–3 marks] Answers in this band will show only a limited awareness of the question. Responses may be short and un/underdeveloped. At the bottom of the band (1 mark), expect one weak point. Higher in the band (2–3 marks), candidates may offer more than one weak point, but there may be a tendency towards simplistic answers, engaging with sociological ideas without using sociological language. Band 2 [4–6 marks] Answers in this band will have clear and accurate explanation, showing good sociological knowledge and understanding. Sociological terms and concepts should be expected and explained. At the bottom of the band, the range of points covered may be narrow or lack detail. Higher in the band, answers will cover more than one point in a well-developed way or cover several points in less detail. 4(d) Explain why Marxists criticise media content. 8 Possible responses: • false consciousness – the media convey the dominant ideology and so keep the population ignorant because they are owned and controlled by the capitalist class who deliberately use them to keep power and prevent social change; • indoctrination – people can be manipulated by the media to believe what they want us to believe e.g. people in the UK were manipulated into supporting the invasion of Iraq in 2003 because of the media’s representations; • false needs – the media creates passive consumers who are willing to work hard for the ruling class to buy the things that they have been persuaded that they need – consumer society; • diversion – the media diverts attention away from really important issues in society by feeding the audience with a diet of gossip and trivia. Radical ideas are ridiculed or ignored and so the status quo is maintained; • alternative views – these are rarely seen in the media and when they are restricted to small media outlets/niche media or presented in a way that marginalises or ridicules them; • ownership and control – the media is dominated by multinational corporations or state-owned media companies meaning that the ruling class are able to manipulate the content of this powerful agent of socialisation to serve their own capitalist needs; • any other reasonable response. Band 0 [0 marks] No creditworthy response. Band 1 [1–3 marks] Answers in this band will show only a limited awareness of the question. A tendency to description is likely. Responses may be short and undeveloped and points stated without explanation. Sociological terms and concepts are unlikely to be used. At the bottom of the band (1 mark), expect one weak point. Higher in the band (2–3 marks), candidates may offer more than one weak point. Band 2 [4–6 marks] Answers in this band will show basic sociological knowledge and understanding. Responses maybe underdeveloped and lacking in range. At the bottom of the band, candidates are unlikely to use sociological terms and concepts accurately. Higher in the band, candidates may be beginning to use sociological terms and concepts with greater accuracy. However, some aspects of the answer may only be partially developed/explained. Band 3 [7–8 marks] Answers in this band will show good sociological knowledge and understanding and will be well-developed and explained. Sociological terms and concepts will be used accurately overall. Answers will be well- focused on the question and there will be a range of points presented. At the top of the band explanations will be clear throughout. 4(e) To what extent is violence in society caused by violence in the media? 15 Possible responses: Arguments for: • imitation – children learn from copying others so they may copy violence they see in the media; • role models – younger members of the audience in particular are heavily influenced by their media role models who they look up to therefore if they are committing acts of violence then it is likely that the audience members will perceive this to be ok for them to do too; • agent of socialisation – the media is thought to be a very influential agent of socialisation, particularly on young people and with the advent of new media. This means that the audience will see violent actions in the media as the norm and will be influenced by this; • desensitisation – the audience may become so used to seeing images of violence in the media that it loses the ability to shock them and so may make them more likely to be violent themselves; • hypodermic syringe model – this claims that an immediate and direct effect upon the audience is caused by their exposure to media violence – validated by the Bobo Doll experiment by Bandura; • cultural effects – it is likely that if the audience sees repeated images of violence over time e.g. through being a regular gamer or consumer of action movies, then this will start to influence their own behaviour and attitudes (drip-drip effect); • susceptibility of the audience – most researchers recognise that some audience members e.g. the young, the marginalised, are more susceptible to media violence than others – for these individuals it is likely that media violence does lead to increased levels of violence in society; • any other reasonable response. Arguments against: • individualism – an audience comprises of very different individuals all of whom will react differently to violent content therefore it is inaccurate to claim that the media can make the audience more violent; • hypodermic syringe – the idea that the media have a direct and immediate effect on the audience is outdated, most people believe the media is not this powerful; • audience selection – a lot of the audience members will choose not to consume violent media material and therefore will not be made more violent by it; • Hall’s reception theory – members of the audience will all decode a media text in different ways therefore media producers do not know the effects that their products will have on the audience; • Morley – social factors – many researchers believe that how susceptible an individual is to media violence depends on their class, gender and age – not everyone reacts in the same way; • uses and gratifications – audiences are in control of how they use the media and therefore are unlikely to be very susceptible to violent media content unless they want to be; • catharsis – violence in the media may have positive effects on the audience by safely channelling strong emotions e.g. by playing violent video games – this prevents real life violence; 4(e) • sensitisation – the shock effect of seeing violence in the media causes the audience to take action against real life violence thereby reducing levels of violence in society; • violence pre-media – violence in society has always existed, a long time before the development of the industry, therefore any claims that the two are linked are dubious; • user generated content – today’s new interactive media means that often it is the audience who are also the media producers – this disputes the idea that the media have a strong, negative effect upon the audience’s thoughts and actions; • any other reasonable response. Band 0 [0 marks] No creditworthy response. Band 1 [1–4 marks] Answers in this band may be vague and largely based on common sense showing limited knowledge of the debate. Use of sociological terms or concepts is very unlikely. Responses may be short, undeveloped and one- sided. Lower in the band (1–2 marks), expect one or two weak points. Higher in the band (3–4 marks) candidates may offer more than two points and provide a weak definition of key terms in the question. Band 2 [5–8 marks] In this band candidates will show some basic knowledge of the debate. Alternatively, they may offer an answer which is list-like in nature but there will be no real attempt to assess the issues raised by the question. There may be limited/some use of sociological terms or concepts. Responses may be underdeveloped and lack range. Answers may be simplistic and two- sided or only cover one side of the debate. Lower in the band, the response may be rather narrow in the points covered and there may be some development. Higher in the band, more points are likely to be covered with some development. Alternatively, a list-like answer with some development covering both sides of the argument may score up to 8 marks. A one-sided answer cannot score higher than 8 marks. Band 3 [9–12 marks] Answers in this band will show good sociological knowledge and understanding of the debate. Sociological terms and concepts will be used with greater accuracy and/or frequency. For the most part, answers will be well-developed, focused on the question and there will be a range of points presented. There will be a two-sided response but it may lack range on one side. At the bottom of the band, candidates may provide a narrower range of developed points. At the top of the band, expect a wider range of developed points and clear focus on the question. 4(e) Band 4 [13–15 marks] Answers in this band will show excellent knowledge and understanding of the debate. There will be a strong grasp of the arguments as well as accurate and frequent use of sociological terms and concepts. Answers will be well-developed, clearly focused on the question and discuss a wide range of points. Responses will be two-sided and have a range of points on each side. At the bottom of the band (13 marks), the answer may lack a specific conclusion. Higher in the band, there will be a clear attempt to offer an assessment of the ‘To what extent.?’ part of the question through a focused conclusion.
2 Educational achievement is not the same for everyone. Some social groups typically do better than others in examinations. Sociologists debate the causes of these differences in achievement. Some sociologists claim it is because of a self-fulfilling prophecy. Other sociologists argue that material deprivation is the main factor, but ethnicity and gender are also relevant. (a) What is meant by the term ‘self-fulfilling prophecy’? [2] (b) Describe two examples of ethnocentrism in schools. [4] (c) Explain how material deprivation may affect the educational achievement of students. [6] (d) Explain why schools use sanctions and rewards. [8] (e) To what extent does gender affect educational achievement? [15] Section C: Crime, deviance and social control
35 marks
Mark scheme: 2(a) What is meant by the term ‘self−fulfilling prophecy’? 2 One mark for partial definition, e.g. acting like a stereotype; Two marks for clear definition, e.g. when people act in the way they have been expected to, making the expectations come true. 2(b) Describe two examples of ethnocentrism in schools. 4 Possible answers: history − what is taught in the history syllabus in schools may favour the ethnic majority and thus ethnic minority pupils may learn nothing of their own people’s experiences; language − the dominant ethnic group’s language may be more valued than ethnic minority groups whose slang or patois may be criticised and devalued; authors studied − it may be that the authors studied reflect the ethnic majority make–up of the students, implicitly devaluing the culture and literature of ethnic minority groups; the way the school year and school holidays are organised may make children from some ethnic backgrounds not feel included e.g. based on cultural norms of the ethnic majority; the curriculum today is often based on the white culture (Troyna and Williams) − in British schools the curriculum is ethnocentric because it ‘gives priority to the white culture and English language’, there is no diversity to the curriculum; school routines and practices − the kind of food available in a school may reflect the cultural majority and exclude minority ethnic groups; school uniform requirements may reflect culturally dominant values etc.; Ball − he criticises the school curriculum for being ethnocentric as it routinely ignores the history of minority ethnic groups and what they have achieved; Student/teacher attitudes – stereotyping – whereby there are negative and/or lower expectations placed on ethnic minority students that devalue their abilities and potential to achieve well; any other reasonable response. One mark for each point correctly identified (up to a maximum of two). One mark for each point that is developed (up to a maximum of two). 2(c) Explain how material deprivation may affect the educational 6 achievement of students. Possible answers: type of school attended − attending a disadvantaged school in a poor area that cannot offer as good an education as those in more prosperous areas or private schools will negatively affect aspirations and achievement; diet − an inadequate diet, lacking in fresh food and nutrients has been shown to lead to problems in concentration and tiredness; home environment − not having a quiet place to study, over−crowding, cold/damp conditions will all negatively affect educational achievement; resources − a lack of educational books, materials, computer, software, private tutors etc. will all disadvantage a child in terms of their achievement; preschool − not having attended preschool education because of a lack of money to pay the fees has been shown to disadvantage a child’s learning and achievement; part−time jobs − poorer students often have to combine earning a wage with going to school and studying which is likely to affect how well they do; financial position of parents − coming from a family that is not able to financially support children through further or higher education may cause students to limit their ambitions from an early age and so affect their school achievements; any other reasonable response. Band 0 [0 marks] No creditworthy response. Band 1 [1−3 marks] Answers in this band will show only a limited awareness of the question. Responses may be short and un/underdeveloped. At the bottom of the band (1 mark), expect one weak point. Higher in the band (2–3 marks), candidates may offer more than one weak point, but there may be a tendency towards simplistic answers, engaging with sociological ideas without using sociological language. Band 2 [4−6 marks] Answers in this band will have clear and accurate explanation, showing good sociological knowledge and understanding. Sociological terms and concepts should be expected and explained. At the bottom of the band, the range of points covered may be narrow or lack detail. Higher in the band, answers will cover more than one point in a well−developed way or cover several points in less detail. 2(d) Explain why schools use sanctions and rewards. 8 Possible answers: socialisation − functionalists believe education passes on the shared norms and values of society through the hidden curriculum and the school’s system of sanctions and rewards and so helps students feel like they belong to society (social solidarity); formal social control − formal control such as exclusions and isolations are used to ensure that students conform to the rules and regulations of school and then to wider society; informal social control − facial expressions and words are used in school in order to subtly influence what students perceive as right and wrong behaviour − this can be through praise or disapproval; deterrence − sanctions are used by schools in order to deter students from choosing the ‘wrong’ path and so help to maintain social order; role modelling/imitation − by demonstrating the correct actions/attitudes and rewarding those students that do this schools are able to mould young people into the good citizens of the future e.g. manners; social hierarchy − Marxists believe the sanctions and rewards used by schools are there to maintain the status quo; the social hierarchy is not challenged as students are encouraged to ‘know their place’ and thus ruling class power and privilege is maintained; Marxism − preparation for the world of work − indoctrination happens through the hidden curriculum and is reinforced through sanctions and rewards e.g. students learn to be punctual through being punished if they are late − this is also needed in the world of work; patriarchy − sanctions and rewards are used in schools to ensure the continuation of gender roles and to ensure that males maintain their privileges in society (feminism) e.g. gender role models in schools and teachers having higher expectations of boys in terms of careers; any other reasonable response. Band 0 [0 marks] No creditworthy response. Band 1 [1−3 marks] Answers in this band will show only a limited awareness of the question. A tendency to description is likely. Responses may be short and undeveloped and points stated without explanation. Sociological terms and concepts are unlikely to be used. At the bottom of the band (1 mark), expect one weak point. Higher in the band (2–3 marks), candidates may offer more than one weak point. Band 2 [4−6 marks] Answers in this band will show basic sociological knowledge and understanding. Responses maybe underdeveloped and lacking in range. At the bottom of the band, candidates are unlikely to use sociological terms and concepts accurately. Higher in the band, candidates may be beginning to use sociological terms and concepts with greater accuracy. However, some aspects of the answer may only be partially developed/explained. 2(d) Band 3 [7−8 marks] Answers in this band will show good sociological knowledge and understanding and will be well−developed and explained. Sociological terms and concepts will be used accurately overall. Answers will be well−focused on the question and there will be a range of points presented. At the top of the band explanations will be clear throughout. 2(e) To what extent does gender affect educational achievement? 15 Possible answers: Arguments for: boys are prioritised for access to education over girls in some societies meaning their achievements will be higher; subject choice − girls typically choose to study communication and arts–based subjects whereas boys choose technology and science − this will affect achievement in particular subjects; classroom space − studies show that labs and some classrooms are dominated by boys meaning that male students tend to get more teacher attention − this is likely to affect achievement; textbook representations − these can still be quite stereotypical when it comes to gender, meaning that boys and girls may feel that some subjects are not for them − this can lower aspirations in that subject; societal changes − the attitude and motivation of girls has increased because there are more opportunities now for girls to do well and more successful women acting as role models; positive discrimination − some schools use these schemes to encourage girls to aim higher − e.g. they may ensure that girls have priority over boys in lab equipment access; girls are often better motivated, more studious and spend more time on coursework, they may occupy a ‘bedroom culture’ and therefore achieve more than boys; teacher labelling − teachers may see boys as more troublesome and punish them more than girls leading to a self−fulfilling prophecy of underachievement; laddish behaviour − boys may be more influenced by peer pressure and may be part of an anti−school subculture (Willis); much schoolwork is based on writing and reading which does not typically suit male interests which tend to be much more active and outdoors; fewer traditionally male jobs − this may make boys think there’s little point in them working hard to pass exams when there are few job opportunities; any other reasonable response. Arguments against: meritocracy − functionalists believe that education offers all students the same opportunities for success so if one student is less successful than another this must be down to how much work and effort has been put in; material factors − how much money a student has for resources, private tuition, computer, software, revision resources etc. may have a much greater impact on educational achievement than their gender; 2(e) home factors − whether a student’s home life is conducive to educational success may have more impact than the students gender on achievement e.g. quiet study space, parents valuing education, diet etc.; ethnicity − some ethnic groups typically achieve a lot better than others in education and it may be this rather than gender that is most influential e.g. Archer’s research into why Chinese students do so well at school; social class − research shows that social class seems to be the most important social factor to influence a student’s educational achievement, not their gender; linguistic influences − the speech codes used by students and whether the majority language is the student’s first or second language may be far more influential on educational achievement than gender; peer group − the peer group a student belongs to has a big influence on their attitude to school and may affect whether they join an anti−school or a pro−school subculture − this is not to do with gender; too deterministic − to argue that gender affects student achievement is too deterministic − it depends on the individual involved; intersection − it is more likely that a combination of different social factors work together to affect educational achievement e.g. it is untrue to say that all males under−perform in education, whereas this is far more likely for working class and ethnic minority males; type of school attended − it may not be gender that affects educational achievement but instead the type of school attended e.g. results are typically higher in private and grammar schools than in state schools; curriculum − in most countries now girls and boys study the same curriculum so gender cannot be particularly influential when it comes to achievement; any other reasonable response. Band 0 [0 marks] No creditworthy response. Band 1 [1−4 marks] Answers in this band may be vague and largely based on common sense showing limited knowledge of the debate. Use of sociological terms or concepts is very unlikely. Responses may be short, undeveloped and one−sided. Lower in the band (1–2 marks), expect one or two weak points. Higher in the band (3–4 marks) candidates may offer more than two points and provide a weak definition of key terms in the question. Band 2 [5−8 marks] In this band candidates will show some basic knowledge of the debate. Alternatively, they may offer an answer which is list−like in nature but there will be no real attempt to assess the issues raised by the question. There may be limited/some use of sociological terms or concepts. Responses may be underdeveloped and lack range. Answers may be simplistic and two−sided or only cover one side of the debate. Lower in the band, the response may be rather narrow in the points covered and there may be some development. Higher in the band, more points are likely to be covered with some development. Alternatively, a list−like answer with some development covering both sides of the argument may score up to 8 marks. 2(e) A one−sided answer cannot score higher than 8 marks. Band 3 [9−12 marks] Answers in this band will show good sociological knowledge and understanding of the debate. Sociological terms and concepts will be used with greater accuracy and/or frequency. For the most part, answers will be well−developed, focused on the questions and there will be a range of points presented. There will be a two sided response but it may lack range on one side. At the bottom of the band, candidates may provide a narrower range of developed points. At the top of the band, expect a wider range of developed points and clear focus on the question. Band 4 [13−15 marks] Answers in this band will show excellent knowledge and understanding of the debate. There will be a strong grasp of the arguments as well as accurate and frequent use of sociological terms and concepts. Answers will be well−developed, clearly focused on the question and discuss a wide range of points. Responses will be two−sided and have a range of points on each side. At the bottom of the band (13 marks), the answer may lack a specific conclusion. Higher in the band, there will be a clear attempt to offer an assessment of the ‘To what extent.?’ part of the question through a focused conclusion.
3 Crime rates are measured in different ways by sociologists and governments. Two examples of how crime can be measured are official crime statistics and self-report studies. As well as looking at what types of crimes are committed, the measurements can also include which social groups commit recorded crimes or are victims of crimes. (a) What is meant by the term ‘official crime statistics’? [2] (b) Describe two punishments for crime in modern industrial societies. [4] (c) Explain how crimes can be committed online. [6] (d) Explain why crime rates for some ethnic groups are higher than for others. [8] (e) To what extent can self-report studies provide an accurate measurement of crime? [15] Section D: Media
35 marks
Mark scheme: 3(a) What is meant by the term ‘official crime statistics’? 2 One mark for partial definition, e.g. how many people commit crime; Two marks for clear definition, e.g. government figures on the numbers of crimes committed and the offenders. 3(b) Describe two punishments for crime in modern industrial societies. 4 Possible answers: incarceration −prisons are used to lock criminals away and to remove their freedom; death penalty − in some MIS’s the most serious crimes can be punished by death e.g. USA; community sentencing − being required to give something back to the community against whom the criminal offended e.g. litter picking; electronic tagging − being monitored by the formal agencies and having personal freedoms restricted as punishment for crime e.g. curfews; ostracism − being shunned and ignored within a community because of the crime committed; exile − being sent away from the community due to the crime committed; fines − criminals must pay a monetary sum in order to ‘pay for’ their crime; rehabilitation − counselling or psychological or addiction services may be a compulsory part of a criminal’s programme of rehabilitation and punishment; any other reasonable response. One mark for each point correctly identified (up to a maximum of two). One mark for each point that is developed (up to a maximum of two). 3(c) Explain how crimes can be committed online. 6 Possible answers: cybercrimes − crimes involving the use of new technologies − these are often the digital equivalent of crimes that existed previously e.g. online frauds and scams; new technology specific crimes − new crimes have been created with the advent of digital technology e.g. catfishing, phishing etc.; online crimes can be committed by individuals, groups, organisations or by the state; targeting victims through their computer − e.g. infecting PCs or networks or security systems with a virus; easy to get away with as difficult to police − cybercrimes are notoriously difficult to police and control e.g. the criminals may have far more advanced technological understanding than the formal agents and so find committing online crimes easy; global − cybercrimes tend to cross borders and are thus global in scale e.g. ‘sweetheart scams’, fraud etc.; illegal file sharing − with media now being both digital and global, it has become much easier to infringe copyright and to download/stream/file share illegally; organised crime − this is typically coordinated through the internet e.g. human trafficking, drug dealing etc.; cyberterrorism − the internet is used for widespread, deliberate attacks on computers and computer networks e.g. hacking of government sites; any other reasonable response. Band 0 [0 marks] No creditworthy response. Band 1 [1−3 marks] Answers in this band will show only a limited awareness of the question. Responses may be short and un/underdeveloped. At the bottom of the band (1 mark), expect one weak point. Higher in the band (2–3 marks), candidates may offer more than one weak point, but there may be a tendency towards simplistic answers, engaging with sociological ideas without using sociological language. Band 2 [4−6 marks] Answers in this band will have clear and accurate explanation, showing good sociological knowledge and understanding. Sociological terms and concepts should be expected and explained. At the bottom of the band, the range of points covered may be narrow or lack detail. Higher in the band, answers will cover more than one point in a well−developed way or cover several points in less detail. 3(d) Explain why crime rates for some ethnic groups are higher than for 8 others. Possible answers: labelling theory − Becker − some ethnic groups are stereotyped as ‘criminal’ and are thus targeted by the police − they are therefore more likely to be caught; institutional racism − if society and/or organisations are inherently racist, then some ethnic groups will not have the same opportunities as others and will be treated more harshly by the formal agents e.g. the McPherson Report UK; demographics − most crime is committed by young people; some ethnic groups have a higher proportion of young people than the majority group so more crime would be expected of them; resistance − if racialised social inequalities exist within a society then some minority ethnic groups are likely to feel disillusioned with society and turn to crime as a form of resistance; gangs − gangs tend to form along racial lines; those ethnic groups most heavily involved in gang lifestyles are most likely to commit crimes; relative deprivation − Lea and Young − when minority ethnic groups share the same values and aspirations as wider society but have fewer legitimate means to achieve them, these groups may feel marginalised and so turn to crime in order to achieve these goals illegally; greater economic success − those ethnic groups who have economic capital within a society are least likely to commit crime; socialisation and community involvement − those ethnic groups who have strong bonds of attachment (Hirschi) to their community/religion/ family are least likely to commit crime; status frustration − Cohen − those ethnic groups with lower educational qualifications who have not achieved well in education are most likely to turn to crime to get status in a different way; any other reasonable response. Band 0 [0 marks] No creditworthy response. Band 1 [1−3 marks] Answers in this band will show only a limited awareness of the question. A tendency to description is likely. Responses may be short and undeveloped and points stated without explanation. Sociological terms and concepts are unlikely to be used. At the bottom of the band (1 mark), expect one weak point. Higher in the band (2–3 marks), candidates may offer more than one weak point. Band 2 [4−6 marks] Answers in this band will show basic sociological knowledge and understanding. Responses maybe underdeveloped and lacking in range. At the bottom of the band, candidates are unlikely to use sociological terms and concepts accurately. Higher in the band, candidates may be beginning to use sociological terms and concepts with greater accuracy. However, some aspects of the answer may only be partially developed/explained. 3(d) Band 3 [7−8 marks] Answers in this band will show good sociological knowledge and understanding and will be well−developed and explained. Sociological terms and concepts will be used accurately overall. Answers will be well−focused on the question and there will be a range of points presented. At the top of the band explanations will be clear throughout. 3(e) To what extent can self−report studies provide an accurate 15 measurement of crime? Possible answers: Arguments for: confidential − as self−report studies (SRS) are carried out confidentially, respondents may be more likely to tell the truth as they do not worry about being exposed as a criminal; dark figure − SRSs can find out about crimes that do not feature in the official crime statistics (OCS) and so can produce a more valid understanding of crimes committed; who are the criminals − SRSs can challenge the notion of the ‘typical offender’ as their results demonstrate that all social groups commit crime e.g. greater numbers of female and middle class criminals are revealed in SRSs than in the OCS so giving a more accurate picture of crime; the use of self–report data is now well established in the study of crime and deviance − such as sexual deviance, problem drinking, and mental disorders. It is thought to offer useful additional information to provide a more accurate measurement; self−report studies try to overcome the socially constructed nature of the official crime statistics by considering unreported and unrecorded crimes in their research to reach a more accurate conclusion; quantitative data − the ‘tick list’ format of SRSs allows for a large sample to be questioned and for patterns and trends in criminality to be easily identified and compared in order to improve accuracy of understanding; victimless crimes − self−report studies can investigate victimless crimes e.g. illegal drugs, prostitution, which will not be revealed in official measures of crime and so produces a more accurate picture of crime; longitudinal − SRSs can be longitudinal in nature, allowing researchers to document criminal behaviour over time and to more accurately understand criminality than a snapshot picture provided by official sources; any other reasonable response. Arguments against: not admitting to crimes − there is no guarantee that respondents answering SRSs will tell the truth, this could compromise their validity; over−exaggerating criminality − as SRSs are sometimes done in a group environment there is a risk that respondents may exaggerate the crimes they have committed to impress their peers, so reducing accuracy; memory − SRSs rely on participant’s memories which may not be accurate; 3(e) sample − many SRSs are carried out on young people which is not representative of all criminals and therefore cannot be generalised − white−collar crimes, for example, are not covered − this isn’t an accurate picture of crime; relevance − some SRSs ask about trivial crimes e.g. travelling on public transport without a ticket, this does not really provide researchers with an accurate picture of crime; lack of reliability − responses to statements may depend upon the social characteristics of the researcher if completed via an interview, meaning the data could be unreliable and inaccurate in terms of the picture of crime presented; victim surveys − asking the victims of crime what crimes they have been victims of is likely to be more valid than asking the offenders as there is less incentive to lie/mislead; official crime statistics − as these are carried out by trained, formal and trustworthy agencies these should be the most accurate picture of crime; combination − methodological pluralism − no one method provides ‘the most accurate’ picture of crime, it depends on what crimes you are investigating and what you want to find out about − perhaps combining measurements will provide the most accurate measurement; any other reasonable response. Band 0 [0 marks] No creditworthy response. Band 1 [1−4 marks] Answers in this band may be vague and largely based on common sense showing limited knowledge of the debate. Use of sociological terms or concepts is very unlikely. Responses may be short, undeveloped and one−sided. Lower in the band (1–2 marks), expect one or two weak points. Higher in the band (3–4 marks) candidates may offer more than two points and provide a weak definition of key terms in the question. Band 2 [5−8 marks] In this band candidates will show some basic knowledge of the debate. Alternatively, they may offer an answer which is list−like in nature but there will be no real attempt to assess the issues raised by the question. There may be limited/some use of sociological terms or concepts. Responses may be underdeveloped and lack range. Answers may be simplistic and two−sided or only cover one side of the debate. Lower in the band, the response may be rather narrow in the points covered and there may be some development. Higher in the band, more points are likely to be covered with some development. Alternatively, a list−like answer with some development covering both sides of the argument may score up to 8 marks. 3(e) A one−sided answer cannot score higher than 8 marks. Band 3 [9−12 marks] Answers in this band will show good sociological knowledge and understanding of the debate. Sociological terms and concepts will be used with greater accuracy and/or frequency. For the most part, answers will be well−developed, focused on the questions and there will be a range of points presented. There will be a two−sided response but it may lack range on one side. At the bottom of the band, candidates may provide a narrower range of developed points. At the top of the band, expect a wider range of developed points and clear focus on the question. Band 4 [13−15 marks] Answers in this band will show excellent knowledge and understanding of the debate. There will be a strong grasp of the arguments as well as accurate and frequent use of sociological terms and concepts. Answers will be well−developed, clearly focused on the question and discuss a wide range of points. Responses will be two−sided and have a range of points on each side. At the bottom of the band (13 marks), the answer may lack a specific conclusion. Higher in the band, there will be a clear attempt to offer an assessment of the ‘To what extent.?’ part of the question through a focused conclusion.
4 The media is an increasingly important agent of socialisation in contemporary society. Media role models and the representations of some social groups are often stereotypical and some sociologists are concerned about the effects of this on the audience. Concerns have also been expressed about the power and influence of those who control the media and of the media’s negative influence on children. (a) What is meant by the term ‘role model’? [2] (b) Describe two traditional media stereotypes of the working class. [4] (c) Explain how audiences use social media. [6] (d) Explain why many sociologists are concerned about the effects of media violence on children. [8] (e) To what extent is ruling class power maintained by the media? [15]
35 marks
Mark scheme: 4(a) What is meant by the term ‘role model’? 2 One mark for partial definition, e.g. someone you look up to; Two marks for clear definition, e.g. individuals who act as examples to others who try to follow their attitudes and behaviour. 4(b) Describe two traditional media stereotypes of the working class. 4 Possible answers: underrepresented − research shows a lack of working class people in the media when compared to the higher classes; hard working, manual labourers − traditional representations (often male) of working class people working hard for little money or reward; community values − working class are often shown to be loyal to their community and to help one another out in times of need; housewives − working class females are often shown in the housewife role, looking after the domestic duties and the family; welfare scroungers − those claiming welfare benefits are often portrayed in a negative light as workshy and lazy (Murray); strikers − GUMG research showed the working class to be portrayed negatively as greedy and unreasonable; irresponsible and lacking in common sense − particularly associated with sitcoms − e.g. Homer Simpson; set in their ways − often shown as resistant to social change, unaccepting of new identities and ideologies e.g. hegemonic masculinity (Connell); white extremism − can be represented politically as being part of far right groups and engaging in racist and hostile behaviours e.g. fascism, Neo−Nazis etc.; any other reasonable response. One mark for each point correctly identified (up to a maximum of two). One mark for each point that is developed (up to a maximum of two). 4(c) Explain how audiences use social media. 6 Possible answers: instant messaging − sites are used for ‘friends’ (who may not actually be known to one another) to send communications, keep in touch; sharing videos and photos − video and image files can be peer−to−peer shared using social media; social networking − networks can be built and strengthened through social media contacts, either for pleasure, leisure or work–based activities; employment − social media is now used regularly in job searches, job advertisements and to vet potential candidates through search histories and previous posts e.g. LinkedIn; interactivity − audiences add comments, join conversations etc. in order to be an active part of social media content; prosumers − social media can be used by the audience to upload content to other users e.g. citizen journalism; entertainment − social media has become a platform for entertainment e.g., sharing ‘memes’, jokes, quizzes, spoilers, trailers etc.; trending − social media allows users to see what’s currently trending and to keep up to date e.g. with fashion; celebrities/star appeal − sites such as Twitter are often used to ‘follow’ stars and read posts/comment interactively etc./creates ‘fandom’; group membership − groups of specialist interest use social media and have large numbers of members on a global scale e.g. allotment online, fishing, football, sewing etc.; dating − social media sites are now the most common platform for online dating; social media can be used, particularly by the young, as a means of avoiding FOMO (fear of missing out), to be a part of something; any other reasonable response. Band 0 [0 marks] No creditworthy response. Band 1 [1−3 marks] Answers in this band will show only a limited awareness of the question. Responses may be short and un/underdeveloped. At the bottom of the band (1 mark), expect one weak point. Higher in the band (2–3 marks), candidates may offer more than one weak point, but there may be a tendency towards simplistic answers, engaging with sociological ideas without using sociological language. Band 2 [4−6 marks] Answers in this band will have clear and accurate explanation, showing good sociological knowledge and understanding. Sociological terms and concepts should be expected and explained. At the bottom of the band, the range of points covered may be narrow or lack detail. Higher in the band, answers will cover more than one point in a well−developed way or cover several points in less detail. 4(d) Explain why many sociologists are concerned about the effects of 8 media violence on children. Possible answers: hypodermic syringe model − research indicates (Bobo doll experiment) that children may imitate the violence they see in the media in real life e.g. copycat killings; cultural effects theories − seeing repeated images of violence in the media has a cumulative effect on children, making them more likely to commit acts of violence themselves; glamorising violence − films, rap music videos and TV shows have all been accused of representing violence as something ‘cool’ and ‘glamorous’ −this distorted representation may make violence seem appealing to children; desensitisation − children may become so used to consuming violence in the media that they are no longer shocked by it − this makes them less likely to take action against it and more likely to commit it themselves; normalisation − the amount of violence in the media has increased greatly and has become increasingly graphic; sociologists fear that this normalises violence for children and that it is therefore more likely to happen in society; vulnerable nature of children − children are not fully formed, they are still learning and so are highly susceptible to the effects of the media and therefore to violence; digital technology − this has resulted in a media culture in which many children have smart−phones − the power of the media to influence them in areas such as violence is thus very great; on−demand media − as so much media is now streamed and available on−demand, the power of censorship such as the watershed to protect children from unsuitable content such as violence is considerably lessened; any other reasonable response. Band 0 [0 marks] No creditworthy response. Band 1 [1−3 marks] Answers in this band will show only a limited awareness of the question. A tendency to description is likely. Responses may be short and undeveloped and points stated without explanation. Sociological terms and concepts are unlikely to be used. At the bottom of the band (1 mark), expect one weak point. Higher in the band (2–3 marks), candidates may offer more than one weak point. Band 2 [4−6 marks] Answers in this band will show basic sociological knowledge and understanding. Responses maybe underdeveloped and lacking in range. At the bottom of the band, candidates are unlikely to use sociological terms and concepts accurately. Higher in the band, candidates maybe beginning to use sociological terms and concepts with greater accuracy. However, some aspects of the answer may only be partially developed/explained. 4(d) Band 3 [7−8 marks] Answers in this band will show good sociological knowledge and understanding and will be well−developed and explained. Sociological terms and concepts will be used accurately overall. Answers will be well−focused on the question and there will be a range of points presented. At the top of the band explanations will be clear throughout. 4(e) To what extent is ruling class power maintained by the media? 15 Possible answers: Arguments for: ownership − the media is typically owned by those from the ruling class who can use the media as a vehicle to spread dominant ideologies and indoctrinate audiences; media manipulation − the media can influence and manipulate the audience into believing a certain viewpoint through the use of ‘facts’, images and language e.g. the Iraq War; creating false needs − the media support capitalism by creating false needs that turn people into passive consumers − this leads to the constant demand for new products which makes the ruling class increased profits as well as increasing their power; diverting attention − Marxists accuse the media of diverting the audience’s attention away from really important social and global issues through shallow media entertainment and trivia; this prevents the lower social classes from challenging the ‘status quo’ and ruling class power; invisibilising alternative views − views that challenge capitalism or the ruling class are frequently marginalised in the media − through their under−representation or through ridicule e.g. GUMG research; hegemony − most media personnel are drawn from a small range of social groups e.g. typically white, male, middle class, middle aged − this results in a lack of challenge to the ruling class and their power and ideologies; ideological state apparatus − Marxists see the ideological control that the media can wield as instrumental in upholding ruling class power and influence − controlling minds and thoughts; propaganda − the media can use techniques of bias, selection and distortion in order to send out particular messages and viewpoints and so influence the audience’s beliefs e.g. Nazis; ruling class transgression − negative actions by members of the ruling class do not receive as much media attention as those by the lower classes, perpetuating the idea that the lower classes are the ‘problem’ this helps the ruling class to maintain their position of power; any other reasonable response. Arguments against: pluralism − the media can only ever respond to the needs of the audience it cannot influence us − unless media content is wanted by audiences it will not be consumed (competition) and so we are free to resist ruling class authority; choice − there has been so much diversification in the media alongside globalisation that there is literally something for everyone, covering all viewpoints − no one set of beliefs has the power to influence anymore; 4(e) governments − they typically now have rules to prevent monopolies and cross−media ownership and this therefore helps to prevent ruling class power being maintained; feminism − they believe it is not the ruling class who control the media but men; the media is seen to be patriarchal in terms of content, ownership and representations so influencing audiences due to this male power structure; postmodernism − media is no longer vertically integrated meaning that conglomerates have lost the ability to control the media’s content, style and bias which means ruling class power can no longer be maintained through the media; narrowcasting − with the advent of new media and independent companies, so more media for niche, specialised audiences is emerging − this caters for non−mainstream interest and audiences and is often critical of the dominant ideology and the ruling class, challenging their power base; internet − the internet has enabled the audience to access global media alongside being able to research issues, events, politicians and people themselves through academic journals, blogs etc. − this challenges the maintenance of ruling class power as people start to find out ‘the truth’; user–generated content − as the audience are now often also prosumers they are the ones uploading and streaming the content of the media − this challenges ruling class power; any other reasonable response. Band 0 [0 marks] No creditworthy response. Band 1 [1−4 marks] Answers in this band may be vague and largely based on common sense showing limited knowledge of the debate. Use of sociological terms or concepts is very unlikely. Responses may be short, undeveloped and one−sided. Lower in the band (1–2 marks), expect one or two weak points. Higher in the band (3–4 marks) candidates may offer more than two points and provide a weak definition of key terms in the question. Band 2 [5−8 marks] In this band candidates will show some basic knowledge of the debate. Alternatively, they may offer an answer which is list−like in nature but there will be no real attempt to assess the issues raised by the question. There may be limited/some use of sociological terms or concepts. Responses may be underdeveloped and lack range. Answers may be simplistic and two−sided or only cover one side of the debate. Lower in the band, the response may be rather narrow in the points covered and there may be some development. Higher in the band, more points are likely to be covered with some development. Alternatively, a list−like answer with some development covering both sides of the argument may score up to 8 marks. 4(e) A one−sided answer cannot score higher than 8 marks. Band 3 [9−12 marks] Answers in this band will show good sociological knowledge and understanding of the debate. Sociological terms and concepts will be used with greater accuracy and/or frequency. For the most part, answers will be well−developed, focused on the questions and there will be a range of points presented. There will be a two−sided response but it may lack range on one side. At the bottom of the band, candidates may provide a narrower range of developed points. At the top of the band, expect a wider range of developed points and clear focus on the question. Band 4 [13−15 marks] Answers in this band will show excellent knowledge and understanding of the debate. There will be a strong grasp of the arguments as well as accurate and frequent use of sociological terms and concepts. Answers will be well−developed, clearly focused on the question and discuss a wide range of points. Responses will be two−sided and have a range of points on each side. At the bottom of the band (13 marks), the answer may lack a specific conclusion. Higher in the band, there will be a clear attempt to offer an assessment of the ‘To what extent.?’ part of the question through a focused conclusion.
2 Many changes have occurred in the education system. There are now more types of schools and there have been changes in the curriculum. However, despite the changes, there are still clear differences in the educational results of different students and their experiences of being at school. Some sociologists believe that social factors and family background are the reason for these differences. (a) What is meant by the term ‘social factors’? [2] (b) Describe two sanctions that schools use to control students. [4] (c) Explain how Marxists would criticise the education system. [6] (d) Explain why a student’s family background may affect educational achievement. [8] (e) To what extent is the comprehensive system of education the best? [15] Section C: Crime, deviance and social control
35 marks
Mark scheme: 2(a) What is meant by the term ‘social factors’? 2 One mark for partial definition, e.g. male or female OR social class. Two marks for clear definition, e.g. things that affect lifestyle and life chances, such as wealth, religion, age, gender, and ethnicity. 2(b) Describe two sanctions that schools use to control students. 4 Possible answers: detentions – students may be kept behind by teachers at lunchtime or after school to teach them a lesson for their bad behaviour e.g. not doing homework; loss of privileges – schools can remove things that students desire as a form of punishment aimed to encourage conformity e.g. loss of mobile phone, loss of prefect status, loss of lunchtime exit pass etc.; physical punishment – whilst no longer legal in many countries, some schools do use physical punishment in order to control their students and to deter bad behaviour; isolation – schools often have ‘time out’ rooms that badly behaved students are sent to in order to reflect on their actions and to remove them from their peers; exclusion – schools can formally exclude students whose continued bad behaviour is so serious that they are unable to be educated in the institution any longer; letters of praise/recognition in assemblies – public praise for the student’s good behaviour leads to increased likelihood of social conformity amongst other students who then also want this praise; treat trips – students that follow the rules may be rewarded with trips out of school, so encouraging further good behaviour; any other reasonable response. One mark for each point correctly identified (up to a maximum of two). One mark for each point that is developed (up to a maximum of two). 2(c) Explain how Marxists would criticise the education system. 6 Possible answers: • lack of social mobility – education reproduces social inequalities it does not offer many possibilities for upward social mobility and downward social mobility is very rare indeed; • myth of meritocracy – schools claim that they offer equal opportunities to all but Marxists claim that this is not true and that those from the higher social classes achieve more; • private schools – these typically achieve the best results in society but can only be afforded by those at the very top of the social hierarchy which is seen to be unfair; • selection – many schools select students from an entrance exam or use systems of setting and streaming to teach students – these tend to benefit students in the higher social classes; • material factors – students from families with more economic capital are more likely to achieve in education as they can afford additional resources, private tutors, internet etc.; • working class underachievement – the lower a pupil’s social class the less well they do in education which then limits their life chances; • capitalism – schools reproduce and normalise capitalist values and so maintain the unfair system of elitism and privilege for the few (ideological state apparatus); • middle class institutions – schools are very middle class places based on middle class values – they use the elaborated code, teachers label pupils who do not meet the ideal pupil stereotype and they require students to accept the merits of deferred gratification; • any other reasonable response. Band 0 [0 marks] No creditworthy response. Band 1 [1 – 3 marks] Answers in this band will show only a limited awareness of the question. Responses may be short and un/underdeveloped. At the bottom of the band (1 mark), expect one weak point. Higher in the band (2–3 marks), candidates may offer more than one weak point, but there may be a tendency towards simplistic answers, engaging with sociological ideas without using sociological language. Band 2 [4 – 6 marks] Answers in this band will have clear and accurate explanation, showing good sociological knowledge and understanding. Sociological terms and concepts should be expected and explained. At the bottom of the band, the range of points covered may be narrow or lack detail. Higher in the band, answers will cover more than one point in a well–developed way or cover several points in less detail. 2(d) Explain why a student’s family background may affect educational 8 achievement. Possible answers: • parental values – whether parents value education and engage with schools has been proven to be very influential in affecting student aspirations and how well an individual does at school; • role models – having parents who have succeeded in education and who have benefited from deferred gratification is likely to positively affect children; • cultural capital (Bourdieu) – families with more cultural capital help to make education a more straightforward and understandable process than those without e.g. regular trips to art galleries/theatre; • material factors – families that cannot afford additional resources, books, digital technology etc. to support a student’s studies may not achieve as highly as those that can; • accommodation – working class students may live in cramped, noisy conditions in which it will be difficult to study and this is likely to negatively affect their achievement; • diet – students in poverty may not have enough to eat and a lack of good quality nutrition can affect concentration levels and hence how well they achieve at school; • communities – schools based in areas where education is not valued, unemployment is high and deviance is commonplace are unlikely to do as well as those families living in more prosperous areas; • social networks – Bourdieu found that families that had good social contacts and capital were able to help children in terms of gaining work experience placements, seeking careers and university advice etc.; • ethnicity – Archer’s study showed how UK Chinese families encouraged their children to work hard at school and to achieve the best they could do, ‘Tigermums’ studies show the same; • any other reasonable response. Band 0 [0 marks] No creditworthy response. Band 1 [1 – 3 marks] Answers in this band will show only a limited awareness of the question. A tendency to description is likely. Responses may be short and undeveloped and points stated without explanation. Sociological terms and concepts are unlikely to be used. At the bottom of the band (1 mark), expect one weak point. Higher in the band (2–3 marks), candidates may offer more than one weak point. 2(d) Band 2 [4 – 6 marks] Answers in this band will show basic sociological knowledge and understanding. Responses maybe underdeveloped and lacking in range. At the bottom of the band, candidates are unlikely to use sociological terms and concepts accurately. Higher in the band, candidates may be beginning to use sociological terms and concepts with greater accuracy. However, some aspects of the answer may only be partially developed/explained. Band 3 [7 – 8 marks] Answers in this band will show good sociological knowledge and understanding and will be well–developed and explained. Sociological terms and concepts will be used accurately overall. Answers will be well–focused on the question and there will be a range of points presented. At the top of the band explanations will be clear throughout. 2(e) To what extent is the comprehensive system of education the best? 15 Possible answers: Arguments for: • equal opportunities – this is at the heart of the comprehensive system and is the ethos that the schools and the teachers represent – all students can choose from the same offer of subjects and all can do well – they are typically mixed ability and mixed gender; • strong community – comprehensive schools bring together all children and families in an area, regardless of social class, ethnicity or ability – this promotes social solidarity and social integration; • no labelling of students – children are no longer labelled as ‘successes’ or ‘failures’ at the age of 11/when joining secondary school and those that develop academically at a later age have a real chance to succeed; • standardised curriculum and testing – all students follow and have access to the same curriculum and tests which is a system based on fairness and universal standards; • achieved status – the value of working hard to be successful is central to comprehensive schools and this ensures that very few students now leave without qualifications, resulting in better life chances; • meritocracy – functionalists see comprehensive schools as being fair to all students and equalising social divisions to allow hard working, talented young people from all backgrounds the chance to be successful and upwardly mobile; • working class pupils – this group of students are particularly thought to benefit from comprehensive schools improving life chances through the opportunities they offer, as they are the least likely to get into grammar/selective schools; • special educational needs – comprehensive schools are thought to offer nurture and support for children with special educational needs, supporting them through their education, encouraging tolerance and celebrating diversity; • any other reasonable response. Arguments against: • lower standards – some claim that educational standards are lowered in comprehensive schools because the brighter students have to work at the same speed as the less able; • lack of diversity – comprehensive schools are not actually very diverse in their make–up – if the school has a mainly working class catchment area then most of the pupils will also be working class; • impersonal system – comprehensives tend to be large and many are now impersonal academy chains – discipline problems and bullying have been reported by many researchers; • streaming and setting – most comprehensives use systems of setting and streaming, providing a different education for pupils with different abilities – basically selecting – this is not the best for all students; • teacher labelling – teachers still have stereotypes of the ‘ideal pupil’ in their minds in comprehensive schools and this can affect student motivation and work ethic through either positive or negative labels; • other schools – in areas where there are other schools for parents to choose from, the brightest may attend faith/grammar/private schools meaning in effect the tripartite system continues; 2(e) • vocationalism – comprehensive schools still set students off on different educational paths – some for academic education, others for more work–based courses – some sociologists question how fair this really is and whether it is best for all students; • league tables – schools are under pressure to get good results and this means that schools will often ‘get rid of’ troublesome students or reduce/limit exam entries for those students who are unlikely to do well; • faith schools – some sociologists believe these are the best type of school for students to attend as they allow religion to be prioritised alongside education, promoting particular beliefs and values; • private schools – many parents choose to pay for their child’s education and results indicate that students do better academically in private schools due to factors such as better facilities, more cultural capital and smaller class sizes; • single–sex schools – both boys and girls tend to get better results in single–sex schools than co–ed schools which indicates that comprehensive schools may not be the best for all students – bullying is also said to be reduced; • any other reasonable response. Band 0 [0 marks] No creditworthy response. Band 1 [1 – 4 marks] Answers in this band may be vague and largely based on common sense showing limited knowledge of the debate. Use of sociological terms or concepts is very unlikely. Responses may be short, undeveloped and one– sided. Lower in the band (1–2 marks), expect one or two weak points. Higher in the band (3–4 marks) candidates may offer more than two points and provide a weak definition of key terms in the question. Band 2 [5 – 8 marks] In this band candidates will show some basic knowledge of the debate. Alternatively, they may offer an answer which is list–like in nature but there will be no real attempt to assess the issues raised by the question. There may be limited/some use of sociological terms or concepts. Responses may be underdeveloped and lack range. Answers may be simplistic and two– sided or only cover one side of the debate. Lower in the band, the response may be rather narrow in the points covered and there may be some development. Higher in the band, more points are likely to be covered with some development. Alternatively, a list–like answer with some development covering both sides of the argument may score up to 8 marks. A one–sided answer cannot score higher than 8 marks. 2(e) Band 3 [9 – 12 marks] Answers in this band will show good sociological knowledge and understanding of the debate. Sociological terms and concepts will be used with greater accuracy and/or frequency. For the most part, answers will be well developed, focused on the question and there will be a range of points presented. There will be a two–sided response but it may lack range on one side. At the bottom of the band, candidates may provide a narrower range of developed points. At the top of the band, expect a wider range of developed points and clear focus on the question. Band 4 [13 – 15 marks] Answers in this band will show excellent knowledge and understanding of the debate. There will be a strong grasp of the arguments as well as accurate and frequent use of sociological terms and concepts. Answers will be well–developed, clearly focused on the question and discuss a wide range of points. Responses will be two–sided and have a range of points on each side. At the bottom of the band (13 marks), the answer may lack a specific conclusion. Higher in the band, there will be a clear attempt to offer an assessment of the ‘To what extent.?’ part of the question through a focused conclusion.
4 Contemporary media is no longer national or local, it is a global institution often using citizen journalism for its content. Audience members use traditional and new media for many different reasons. Some sociologists believe that the media will influence the audience’s values and attitudes as it is a powerful agent of socialisation. Other sociologists disagree, instead seeing audiences as being in control of the media. (a) What is meant by the term ‘citizen journalism’? [2] (b) Describe two ways the audience use the media, according to the uses and gratifications model. [4] (c) Explain how the media is biased. [6] (d) Explain why contemporary media is global. [8] (e) To what extent does the media influence the audience’s values and attitudes? [15]
35 marks
Mark scheme: 4(a) What is meant by the term ‘citizen journalism’? 2 One mark for partial definition, e.g. news from mobile phones OR blogging. Two marks for clear definition, e.g. the ways in which the public can gather and distribute information either via the internet or via a news company. 4(b) Describe two ways the audience use the media, according to the uses 4 and gratifications model. Possible answers: • entertainment/escapism – relax, fill in time, gain enjoyment from certain media forms and products; • personal relationships – a sense of companionship and belonging, identifying with the characters and their issues from the media; • social relationships – the media text becomes a source of friendship, audiences talk about the media together – it may even generate new friendships e.g. through online forums and chat rooms; • personal identity – audiences compare themselves and their situation to the characters in media texts; they make decisions about their lives based on this and can reinforce or challenge values and beliefs; • information – audiences can find out things beyond their immediate experiences; • education – audiences can learn about new topics/debates/issues and be educated; • any other reasonable response. One mark for each point correctly identified (up to a maximum of two). One mark for each point that is developed (up to a maximum of two). 4(c) Explain how the media is biased. 6 Possible answers: • privately funded companies may be biased towards investors/owners/advertisers and are likely to take a mainstream view in order to maintain this appeal; • owners – can bias media products through only employing staff with the same views as themselves and by directly giving orders to staff on approved content; • controllers – language used, pictures published, tone of phrase etc. can all create a biased piece of media; • propaganda – an untrue version of events that does not allow the audience access to alternative viewpoints e.g. Nazi Germany, North Korea etc.; • Marxism – the media operates from a dominant ideological viewpoint and so stories and issues are slanted to benefit the ruling class and maintain the capitalist ‘status quo’ as fair; • feminism – the media is patriarchal – ownership and control is male dominated and media representations often objectify or make women invisible; • GUMG – their research showed how the news was biased in favour of the management – viewers were manipulated to see the management side as ‘fair and right’ and the strikers as ‘unreasonable and wrong’ – agenda setting; • moral panics – sensationalism and exaggeration in the media leads to misrepresentation of some social groups and the creation of a distorted picture of folk devils and scapegoats; • news values – certain topics/themes feature regularly in the news as these are popular with the audience – this biases content and style; • any other reasonable response. Band 0 [0 marks] No creditworthy response. Band 1 [1 – 3 marks] Answers in this band will show only a limited awareness of the question. Responses may be short and un/underdeveloped. At the bottom of the band (1 mark), expect one weak point. Higher in the band (2–3 marks), candidates may offer more than one weak point, but there may be a tendency towards simplistic answers, engaging with sociological ideas without using sociological language. Band 2 [4 – 6 marks] Answers in this band will have clear and accurate explanation, showing good sociological knowledge and understanding. Sociological terms and concepts should be expected and explained. At the bottom of the band, the range of points covered may be narrow or lack detail. Higher in the band, answers will cover more than one point in a well–developed way or cover several points in less detail. 4(d) Explain why contemporary media is global. 8 Possible answers: • ownership – media conglomerates headed by media moguls are now the norm so media companies are global businesses e.g. Disney; • global village – digital technology has made the world a smaller place and we are now inter–connected on a global level; • citizen journalism – this allows us to see instantly as it happens news and events from around the world; • internet – this has opened up countries to the audience who connect through media output as well as ‘apps’, networks, social media, etc.; • digital platforms – audiences can access media products from all over the world regardless of their own location; • interactivity – the two–way nature of contemporary media has meant that audiences can interact through chat rooms, messaging, forums etc. on a global level – national boundaries are broken down; • smart–phones – these have become normalised in many places in the world now meaning that users are continually inter–connected and able to access global media; • education – online digital learning platforms that use new media technologies have facilitated learning happening at a global level e.g. TEFL courses, University courses etc.; • content – available content for users is no longer determined by where the consumer lives – on–demand and digital technology has meant that we can consume media products from all over the world e.g. Nollywood, Asian network, CNN, BBC etc.; • any other reasonable response. Band 0 [0 marks] No creditworthy response. Band 1 [1 – 3 marks] Answers in this band will show only a limited awareness of the question. A tendency to description is likely. Responses may be short and undeveloped and points stated without explanation. Sociological terms and concepts are unlikely to be used. At the bottom of the band (1 mark), expect one weak point. Higher in the band (2–3 marks), candidates may offer more than one weak point. Band 2 [4 – 6 marks] Answers in this band will show basic sociological knowledge and understanding. Responses maybe underdeveloped and lacking in range. At the bottom of the band, candidates are unlikely to use sociological terms and concepts accurately. Higher in the band, candidates maybe beginning to use sociological terms and concepts with greater accuracy. However, some aspects of the answer may only be partially developed/explained. Band 3 [7 – 8 marks] Answers in this band will show good sociological knowledge and understanding and will be well–developed and explained. Sociological terms and concepts will be used accurately overall. Answers will be well–focused on the question and there will be a range of points presented. At the top of the band explanations will be clear throughout. 4(e) To what extent does the media influence the audience’s values and 15 attitudes? Possible answers: Arguments for: • hypodermic syringe model – the media have direct and immediate effects on the passive audience who soak up the output and therefore values and attitudes are influenced; • cultural effects model – the media has long–term and cumulative effects on the audience; repetition of representations and viewpoints will cause the audience to accept them as ‘correct’ and so influence attitudes and views; • GUMG (Glasgow University Media Group) – research showed that the media do shape audience viewpoints when they do not have access to other sources of information e.g. politics, environmental issues, world news etc.; • bias and distortion – if the media is biased and not neutral then the audience will be presented with a one–sided version of events which will affect how they think e.g. propaganda; • news values – the news is selective in the stories and events on which it reports, favouring those with the strongest news values – this will affect audience views and attitudes; • role modelling – celebrities and stars in the media are often looked up to by members of the audience e.g. sports stars, influencers – what they do, think and say is hugely influential and so can change behaviour and attitudes in the audience; • advertising – advertisers spend a lot of money advertising their products across multiple platforms therefore there must be evidence that it influences the audience otherwise why would they continue to spend this money?; • moral panics – these can influence audiences to think in a particular way about crime and deviance, viewing the folk devils as ‘bad’ and having a critical attitude to those scapegoated; • violence – many studies have demonstrated the power of the media to affect attitudes and views to violence e.g. catharsis, desensitisation, imitation etc; • opinion polls – research shows the power of the media to sway voting decisions and views and opinions on politicians and their policies; • any other reasonable response. Arguments against: • uses and gratifications theory – the audience can decide what they are using the media for and what pleasures they want to get out of it, the media doesn’t influence them; • active audiences – audiences are not passive, they decide which media to consume, they can turn off media they disagree with and thus are in control of their own attitudes and views; • citizen journalism – with smart–phone technology audiences are now filming and uploading ‘news’ as it happens meaning the power of the media to influence attitudes and views is lessened e.g. George Floyd murder case; 4(e) • user–generated content – so much new media is created through the audiences themselves that it is hard to see, particularly for the younger generations, how the media as an institution is affecting their views and attitudes; • generalisations – audience members are individuals and whether the media affects their views and attitudes will depend upon the topic, the context and that individual; • reading media texts – Hall/Morley – research shows how not all audience members ‘read’ media texts in the same way, showing that the media’s power to influence attitudes and views is limited e.g. preferred, negotiated and oppositional readings; • globalisation – today’s media is global therefore we are receiving information and output from all over the world which allows audiences to challenge views presented in their country’s media; • instant new media – the internet allows audiences to research themselves about issues and events, meaning they don’t have to rely on the media for that information – they can use social media, blogs, academic journals etc.; • other agencies of socialisation – may have more influence over views and opinions than the media e.g. those involving human contact and relationships such as family, education, peer group, religion and workplace; • any other reasonable response. Band 0 [0 marks] No creditworthy response. Band 1 [1 – 4 marks] Answers in this band may be vague and largely based on common sense showing limited knowledge of the debate. Use of sociological terms or concepts is very unlikely. Responses may be short, undeveloped and one– sided. Lower in the band (1–2 marks), expect one or two weak points. Higher in the band (3–4 marks) candidates may offer more than two points and provide a weak definition of key terms in the question. Band 2 [5 – 8 marks] In this band candidates will show some basic knowledge of the debate. Alternatively, they may offer an answer which is list–like in nature but there will be no real attempt to assess the issues raised by the question. There may be limited/some use of sociological terms or concepts. Responses may be underdeveloped and lack range. Answers may be simplistic and two– sided or only cover one side of the debate. Lower in the band, the response may be rather narrow in the points covered and there may be some development. Higher in the band, more points are likely to be covered with some development. Alternatively, a list–like answer with some development covering both sides of the argument may score up to 8 marks. A one–sided answer cannot score higher than 8 marks. 4(e) Band 3 [9 – 12 marks] Answers in this band will show good sociological knowledge and understanding of the debate. Sociological terms and concepts will be used with greater accuracy and/or frequency. For the most part, answers will be well–developed, focused on the question and there will be a range of points presented. There will be a two–sided response but it may lack range on one side. At the bottom of the band, candidates may provide a narrower range of developed points. At the top of the band, expect a wider range of developed points and clear focus on the question. Band 4 [13 – 15 marks] Answers in this band will show excellent knowledge and understanding of the debate. There will be a strong grasp of the arguments as well as accurate and frequent use of sociological terms and concepts. Answers will be well–developed, clearly focused on the question and discuss a wide range of points. Responses will be two–sided and have a range of points on each side. At the bottom of the band (13 marks), the answer may lack a specific conclusion. Higher in the band, there will be a clear attempt to offer an assessment of the ‘To what extent.?’ part of the question through a focused conclusion.
2 Some sociologists believe that schools are middle class institutions. Others believe that the education system offers all students the chance to be successful and socially mobile. Some sociologists claim that experiences of education depend on the type of school attended. Educational achievement is not the same for all social groups. For example, some ethnic groups and social classes achieve better than others. (a) What is meant by the term ‘social mobility’? [2] (b) Describe two ways that schools can select students. [4] (c) Explain how social conformity can be achieved in schools. [6] (d) Explain why some ethnic groups achieve better examination results than other ethnic groups. [8] (e) To what extent does the education system benefit middle class students more than working class students? [15] Section C: Crime, deviance and social control
35 marks
Mark scheme: 2(a) What is meant by the term ‘social mobility’? 2 One mark for partial definition, e.g. getting into a higher class; Two marks for clear definition, e.g. the movement of individuals or social groups up or down the social hierarchy. 2(b) Describe two ways that schools can select students. 4 Possible answers: academic ability − the tripartite system in the UK was based on this but many schools across the world test students before entry in order to select the brightest students e.g. IQ test/11+ exam; money − private education has to be paid for by the student’s family and thus money is often a way that schools can select students − if you can’t afford the fees then you won’t be selected; interview − many private schools select students based on their performance in an interview − this is thought to favour those students with more cultural and social capital (elitism, Marxism); religion − faith schools select their students based on their religious beliefs and practices e.g. Catholic schools; gender − not all schools are co−ed, many are single−sex therefore schools select their students on the basis of gender; location − despite the marketisation of education, many schools select students based on their proximity and location to the school e.g. state school catchment areas; any other reasonable response. One mark for each point correctly identified (up to a maximum of two). One mark for each point that is developed (up to a maximum of two). 2(c) Explain how social conformity can be achieved in schools. 6 Possible answers: sanctions − using punishments and reprimands in order to teach children that what they have done or said is wrong e.g. detention; rewards − using praise and prizes in order to teach children that what they have done or said is good and socially approved of; hidden curriculum − attitudes and behaviour can be taught through the way the school is run and how the teachers act, rather than through the taught content of a lesson e.g. manners, respect; peer pressure − students like to fit in and as they get older the approval of the peer group becomes more important therefore peer pressure is a key mechanism used in schools for conformity e.g. appearance, behaviour, work ethic; formal control − written rules are expected to be stuck to and if these are broken then formal control mechanisms may be implemented e.g. exclusion, isolation; informal control − teachers and other students can use body language, comments and facial expressions to express approval or disapproval of a student’s actions − these informal methods of control can create social conformity; any other reasonable response. Band 0 [0 marks] No creditworthy response. Band 1 [1−3 marks] Answers in this band will show only a limited awareness of the question. Responses may be short and un/underdeveloped. At the bottom of the band (1 mark), expect one weak point. Higher in the band (2–3 marks), candidates may offer more than one weak point, but there may be a tendency towards simplistic answers, engaging with sociological ideas without using sociological language. Band 2 [4−6 marks] Answers in this band will have clear and accurate explanation, showing good sociological knowledge and understanding. Sociological terms and concepts should be expected and explained. At the bottom of the band, the range of points covered may be narrow or lack detail. Higher in the band, answers will cover more than one point in a well−developed way or cover several points in less detail. 2(d) Explain why some ethnic groups achieve better examination results 8 than other ethnic groups. Possible answers: role models − teachers may be largely from one ethnic group and this transmits the idea that educational success is associated with some ethnic groups more than others − students may find this de−motivating or inspirational, depending on their ethnicity; positive parental attitudes − some ethnic groups value education and push their children to succeed e.g. Chinese students, ‘Tiger mums’, Song’s research; discrimination in society − some ethnic groups experience racism in society regarding housing and employment and this may affect whether they have access to digital technology, a quiet space to study, money for extra−curricular trips and activities etc.; setting and streaming − there may be discrimination in school which results in some ethnic minority students being placed into lower sets and streams because of assumptions made about their ethnicity; ethnocentrism − the content of lessons may be ethnocentric, treating the culture of the majority as more important and implicitly telling ethnic minority children that their culture is of less value e.g. history; cultural differences − if values at home clash with the values at school then this may hinder a pupil’s progress e.g. their dress, appearance or way of speaking may reinforce teacher stereotypes; teacher expectations − labelling theory (Becker) suggests that the expectations teachers have of children based on their ethnic group may be crucial to determining their educational achievement − self−fulfilling prophecy; resistance − anti−school sub−cultures − these are often formed along ethnic lines and can be a reflection of them rebelling against perceived school and wider societal racism, inequalities and discrimination; social class − ethnicity often cannot be separated from social class: some ethnic groups are more likely to be concentrated in the lower or higher social classes than others and this will affect achievement e.g. material deprivation; gender − in some ethnic groups there are different expectations for each gender e.g. girls from some Asian backgrounds are socialised into stronger traditional female roles which may limit their aspirations so they don’t have the incentive to work hard at school − this is very different in other ethnic groups; any other reasonable response. Band 0 [0 marks] No creditworthy response. Band 1 [1−3 marks] Answers in this band will show only a limited awareness of the question. A tendency to description is likely. Responses may be short and undeveloped and points stated without explanation. Sociological terms and concepts are unlikely to be used. At the bottom of the band (1 mark), expect one weak point. Higher in the band (2–3 marks), candidates may offer more than one weak point. 2(d) Band 2 [4−6 marks] Answers in this band will show basic sociological knowledge and understanding. Responses maybe underdeveloped and lacking in range. At the bottom of the band, candidates are unlikely to use sociological terms and concepts accurately. Higher in the band, candidates may be beginning to use sociological terms and concepts with greater accuracy. However, some aspects of the answer may only be partially developed/explained. Band 3 [7−8 marks] Answers in this band will show good sociological knowledge and understanding and will be well−developed and explained. Sociological terms and concepts will be used accurately overall. Answers will be well−focused on the question and there will be a range of points presented. At the top of the band explanations will be clear throughout. 2(e) To what extent does the education system benefit middle class 15 students more than working class students? Possible answers: Arguments for: private schools − these are dominated by children from the middle/higher social classes where a culture of elitism is cultivated (Marxism) through subjects studied e.g. Latin, extra−curricular activities e.g. polo/lacrosse and often offering boarding facilities; social capital − networks and relationships can be very useful in schools e.g. for work experience placements, research, homework projects, references, advice etc. − middle class students are more likely to have these valuable social networks than are working class; cultural capital − the curriculum content and the nature of learning in schools presumes that students are familiar with literature, art, culture, theatre etc. − this is much more likely for the middle class children than the working class who may not have books at home, have never been to the theatre or an art gallery etc.; national curriculum − subjects studied by the middle class are often academic in nature and not linked to the world of work; students that do choose to study vocational subjects, more often the working class, are often looked down upon and considered less able e.g. childcare is not as valued as classics; hidden curriculum − this is learnt through the way that the school is run and the actions of teachers − if the school hierarchy shows middle class people towards the top and working class people towards the bottom then students will pick this up themselves; teacher expectations − labelling theory (Becker) − studies of the ‘ideal pupil’ suggest that this is embodied with middle class values, appearance, behaviours, language and therefore that teachers may treat students in different social classes differently e.g. setting; language codes − Bernstein − he talks about schools being based upon and using elaborated speech codes associated with the middle classes which may conflict with the restricted codes used at home and with peer groups for the working class; any other reasonable response. 2(e) Arguments against: vocational education − alongside academic subjects most schools and colleges offer vocational education (e.g. plumbing, childcare, health and beauty etc.) in order to cater for everyone, this contradicts the notion that schools benefit the middle class; skills based − schools today are encouraged to ensure children leave school with the skills necessary to enter the workplace and be successful − literacy, numeracy, communication, ICT etc. − these are not class–based benefits; scholarships − most private schools select their students based on ability not their social class background and scholarships exist to further support less privileged/working class children to gain a private education; positive discrimination − initiatives and policies exist to support under−privileged working class children and under−achieving social groups and this does not typically involve the middle class e.g. STEM initiatives for girls, mentoring programs for working class children etc.; functionalism − they claim that schooling is meritocratic and offers everybody the same experiences and opportunities regardless of money or social class; feminism − they criticise the patriarchal nature of schools that still cultivate different gendered expectations and believe these are more influential than whether schooling benefits the middle class; different types of schools − comprehensive schools tend to reflect the social class make up of their students therefore there will be as many predominantly working class schools as there are middle class; state schools − most students attend state run, free schools − private schools are attended by the minority − therefore they will reflect the mixed social class make up of their students; and will not benefit one social class over another; any other reasonable response. Band 0 [0 marks] No creditworthy response. Band 1 [1−4 marks] Answers in this band may be vague and largely based on common sense showing limited knowledge of the debate. Use of sociological terms or concepts is very unlikely. Responses may be short, undeveloped and one−sided. Lower in the band (1–2 marks), expect one or two weak points. Higher in the band (3–4 marks) candidates may offer more than two points and provide a weak definition of key terms in the question. Band 2 [5−8 marks] In this band candidates will show some basic knowledge of the debate. Alternatively, they may offer an answer which is list−like in nature but there will be no real attempt to assess the issues raised by the question. There may be limited/some use of sociological terms or concepts. Responses may be underdeveloped and lack range. 2(e) Answers may be simplistic and two−sided or only cover one side of the debate. Lower in the band, the response may be rather narrow in the points covered and there may be some development. Higher in the band, more points are likely to be covered with some development. Alternatively, a list−like answer with some development covering both sides of the argument may score up to 8 marks. A one−sided answer cannot score higher than 8 marks. Band 3 [9−12 marks] Answers in this band will show good sociological knowledge and understanding of the debate. Sociological terms and concepts will be used with greater accuracy and/or frequency. For the most part, answers will be well−developed, focused on the questions and there will be a range of points presented. There will be a two sided response but it may lack range on one side. At the bottom of the band, candidates may provide a narrower range of developed points. At the top of the band, expect a wider range of developed points and clear focus on the question. Band 4 [13−15 marks] Answers in this band will show excellent knowledge and understanding of the debate. There will be a strong grasp of the arguments as well as accurate and frequent use of sociological terms and concepts. Answers will be well−developed, clearly focused on the question and discuss a wide range of points. Responses will be two−sided and have a range of points on each side. At the bottom of the band (13 marks), the answer may lack a specific conclusion. Higher in the band, there will be a clear attempt to offer an assessment of the ‘To what extent.?’ part of the question through a focused conclusion.
3 Different measurements of crime show the patterns of who commits crime and the types of crime committed. Sociologists look at the data to try and determine why some people commit crime, for example why age is a relevant factor. In some communities criminals experience ostracism. The variety of crimes committed can make enforcement of the law and deterring criminals difficult. (a) What is meant by the term ‘ostracism’? [2] (b) Describe two examples of how criminal behaviour can be deterred. [4] (c) Explain how the police enforce the law. [6] (d) Explain why victim surveys show different patterns of crime than official crime statistics. [8] (e) To what extent is age the most important factor in determining whether an individual commits crime? [15] Section D: Media
35 marks
Mark scheme: 3(a) What is meant by the term ‘ostracism’? 2 One mark for partial definition, e.g. being sent away; Two marks for clear definition, e.g. punishment that involves an individual being excluded from their community, can be physical or emotional. 3(b) Describe two examples of how criminal behaviour can be deterred. 4 Possible answers: public shaming − this can be physically e.g. public executions or through the media − showing the negative consequences of criminality can deter others from committing it; prison − harsh environments, loss of family connections and a lack of freedom aim to deter others from offending; exile − sending offenders out of the community sends a clear message to others that criminal behaviour will not be tolerated; fines − making offenders pay for the crimes they have committed ensures that there are consequences for criminal actions and so deters others; community sentencing − offenders are often forced to wear a ‘uniform’ whilst completing community work making it quite humiliating and meaning other people are quickly discouraged; electronic tagging − keeping offenders under surveillance and monitoring their movements limits freedom and deters both the offender and others from committing crimes; informally − people do not want to let family and friends down and therefore the fear of doing so acts as a deterrent to criminal behaviour; media representations – the media is often a norm referencing tool and so can show the negative consequences of crime, so deterring deviant behaviour, e.g. moral panics; any other reasonable response. One mark for each point correctly identified (up to a maximum of two). One mark for each point that is developed (up to a maximum of two). 3(c) Explain how the police enforce the law. 6 Possible answers: power of arrest − the police have the legal power to arrest suspects and to question and investigate them; community policing − police can work with communities, being a trusted part of the area, to keep neighbourhoods safe; military policing − police can be an ‘invading force’, brought in when social order is necessary e.g. riots; armed police − police can use weapons to ensure that the law is upheld and to deter criminal behaviour in the public; police presence − the presence of the police on patrol is a visible sign of law and order and prevents much offending; police targeting − the police will focus on particular social groups and areas as they believe this is where crime will happen e.g. inner city areas, young males etc.; stop and search − the police have the power to stop and search people suspected of crimes − this prevents much crime from occurring; Marxism − repressive state apparatus − the police act on behalf of the ruling class, ensuring that the lower social classes are ‘kept in their place’ and under control; surveillance − the law can be enforced through surveillance operations e.g. CCTV, undercover operations, telephone monitoring, digital tracking devices etc.; any other reasonable response. Band 0 [0 marks] No creditworthy response. Band 1 [1−3 marks] Answers in this band will show only a limited awareness of the question. Responses may be short and un/underdeveloped. At the bottom of the band (1 mark), expect one weak point. Higher in the band (2–3 marks), candidates may offer more than one weak point, but there may be a tendency towards simplistic answers, engaging with sociological ideas without using sociological language. Band 2 [4−6 marks] Answers in this band will have clear and accurate explanation, showing good sociological knowledge and understanding. Sociological terms and concepts should be expected and explained. At the bottom of the band, the range of points covered may be narrow or lack detail. Higher in the band, answers will cover more than one point in a well−developed way or cover several points in less detail. 3(d) Explain why victim surveys show different patterns of crime than 8 official crime statistics. Possible answers: unreported crimes − victim surveys are able to reveal crimes that were never reported to the police in their data and so may show different patterns; unrecorded crimes − victim surveys can reveal information about crimes that the police did not record/investigate and so look very different to the OCS; asking victims − victims can be asked about the characteristics of offenders even when no prosecutions were brought, this can challenge patterns in the OCS e.g. that females and the middle classes commit more crime than is thought; sample − whilst the OCS are national, victim surveys can focus on specific areas and neighbourhoods which may have different patterns of crime to the average e.g. Lea and Young − Left Realism − Islington survey (local victim surveys); type of crime − victim surveys can concentrate on specific types of crimes in order to better understand the patterns of crime e.g. sexual crimes notoriously under−reported in the OCS (Feminism, Walklate); memory − as victim surveys rely on the respondents’ memories, the patterns of crime shown may be faulty which is not the case with the OCS; any other reasonable response. Band 0 [0 marks] No creditworthy response. Band 1 [1−3 marks] Answers in this band will show only a limited awareness of the question. A tendency to description is likely. Responses may be short and undeveloped and points stated without explanation. Sociological terms and concepts are unlikely to be used. At the bottom of the band (1 mark), expect one weak point. Higher in the band (2–3 marks), candidates may offer more than one weak point. Band 2 [4−6 marks] Answers in this band will show basic sociological knowledge and understanding. Responses maybe underdeveloped and lacking in range. At the bottom of the band, candidates are unlikely to use sociological terms and concepts accurately. Higher in the band, candidates may be beginning to use sociological terms and concepts with greater accuracy. However, some aspects of the answer may only be partially developed/explained. Band 3 [7−8 marks] Answers in this band will show good sociological knowledge and understanding and will be well−developed and explained. Sociological terms and concepts will be used accurately overall. Answers will be well−focused on the question and there will be a range of points presented. At the top of the band explanations will be clear throughout. 3(e) To what extent is age the most important factor in determining whether 15 an individual commits crime? Possible answers: Arguments for: official crime statistics show that young people are most likely to commit crime and elderly people least likely; status crimes − some crimes committed by young people are only criminal offences because of the offenders age e.g. underage alcohol consumption; Matza − drift theory − he believes low level crime is a normal part of a young person’s life, a phase they will drift out of later; postmodernism − crime is committed for thrills and excitement, ‘the buzz’, this is desired by many young people; status frustration − Cohen − his research showed that many young people who had not achieved well at school and therefore did not have high status turned to crime as a way to achieve this; marginalisation − Lea and Young’s research showed that young people were most likely to feel marginalised within society and relatively deprived, therefore they were most likely to turn to crime; gang culture − gang membership is disproportionately young − as they commit a lot of crime then it is not surprising that crime is linked to youth; elderly people − ageing populations − in societies where the population is ageing, rates of crime amongst the elderly are seen to be rising e.g. Japan; lack of responsibilities − crimes may be more likely to be committed by young people because they do not have the same responsibilities as older people therefore the consequences are not as severe; peer pressure − young people are often influenced to engage in criminal acts by their peer group (conformity); labelling theory − Becker − the media and the police have an idea of the ‘typical delinquent’ (Cicourel) and this is used to construct moral panics and police targets for offending − these tend to be young people; any other reasonable response. Arguments against: intersection of social factors − many sociologists believe it is impossible to pinpoint one factor that is influential in the crime rate, multiple factors typically work together not just ‘age’ alone; social class − regardless of the age of the offender, sociological research shows that it is those people from the lower social classes who are most likely to offend; gender − official crime rates show that males are far more likely than females to offend, regardless of age; ethnicity − minority ethnic groups are often portrayed as offenders, this is not about age; lack of status − any person experiencing a lack of status is likely to turn to crime as a means to achieve it, not just particular age groups; deprivation − Marxists believe that it is a lack of economic capital that is the main reason why instrumental crimes are committed, not age; 3(e) inadequate socialisation − The New Right see poor socialisation in the family as the explanation for criminal behaviour amongst the underclass, this is not age specific; individualism − many sociologists believe that crime is an individual’s choice and cannot be explained by social factors such as age (Postmodernism); organised crime groups − these are often linked to drug dealing and to human trafficking and are typically controlled by adults − not youths which may contradict the idea of youth being the most prolific offenders; white−collar crime − most crimes committed in or for the workplace are done by adults − the same is true for state crimes − nothing to do with youth and age, it’s about power and position (Marxism); any other reasonable response. Band 0 [0 marks] No creditworthy response. Band 1 [1−4 marks] Answers in this band may be vague and largely based on common sense showing limited knowledge of the debate. Use of sociological terms or concepts is very unlikely. Responses may be short, undeveloped and one−sided. Lower in the band (1–2 marks), expect one or two weak points. Higher in the band (3–4 marks) candidates may offer more than two points and provide a weak definition of key terms in the question. Band 2 [5−8 marks] In this band candidates will show some basic knowledge of the debate. Alternatively, they may offer an answer which is list−like in nature but there will be no real attempt to assess the issues raised by the question. There may be limited/some use of sociological terms or concepts. Responses may be underdeveloped and lack range. Answers may be simplistic and two−sided or only cover one side of the debate. Lower in the band, the response may be rather narrow in the points covered and there may be some development. Higher in the band, more points are likely to be covered with some development. Alternatively, a list−like answer with some development covering both sides of the argument may score up to 8 marks. A one−sided answer cannot score higher than 8 marks. Band 3 [9−12 marks] Answers in this band will show good sociological knowledge and understanding of the debate. Sociological terms and concepts will be used with greater accuracy and/or frequency. For the most part, answers will be well−developed, focused on the questions and there will be a range of points presented. There will be a two−sided response but it may lack range on one side. At the bottom of the band, candidates may provide a narrower range of developed points. At the top of the band, expect a wider range of developed points and clear focus on the question. 3(e) Band 4 [13−15 marks] Answers in this band will show excellent knowledge and understanding of the debate. There will be a strong grasp of the arguments as well as accurate and frequent use of sociological terms and concepts. Answers will be well−developed, clearly focused on the question and discuss a wide range of points. Responses will be two−sided and have a range of points on each side. At the bottom of the band (13 marks), the answer may lack a specific conclusion. Higher in the band, there will be a clear attempt to offer an assessment of the ‘To what extent.?’ part of the question through a focused conclusion.
3 Official crime statistics reveal a clear trend that most crimes are committed by males. Some sociologists claim it may be due to different gender socialisation. Other sociologists blame factors such as material deprivation and involvement in criminal sub-cultures. However, a criticism of the official crime statistics is that they do not show the true extent of all crimes committed. For example, white-collar crime often goes unreported. (a) What is meant by the term ‘material deprivation’? [2] (b) Describe two criminal sub-cultures. [4] (c) Explain how formal agencies of social control deal with crime. [6] (d) Explain why white-collar crime often goes unreported. [8] (e) To what extent does gender socialisation explain why females commit less crime than males? [15] Section D: Media
35 marks
Mark scheme: 3(a) What is meant by the term ‘material deprivation’? 2 One mark for a partial definition, e.g. being poor. Two marks for a clear definition, e.g. being short of the material goods needed and wanted in society. 3(b) Describe two criminal sub-cultures. 4 Possible answers: • youth sub-cultures e.g. mods, rockers, punks, skinheads – taking drugs, violence, anti-social behaviour, etc.; • organised criminal sub-cultures – Sutherland – criminal behaviour is highly organised to maximise profits e.g. the Mafia; • gangs – a sub-culture based on a strict hierarchy that may be involved in drug dealing, human trafficking, violence, etc.; • retreatist sub-cultures – drug and/or alcohol addicts, often involved in crime to fund their addictions; • conflict sub-cultures – Cloward and Ohlin’s illegitimate opportunity structures and turf wars involving criminal sub-cultures; • underclass sub-cultures – Murray – children socialised into deviant norms and values form criminal sub-cultures; • criminal groups that operate online such as hacking groups often issue ransom threats against individuals, businesses or even the government e.g. the group Anonymous; • any other reasonable response. One mark for each point correctly identified (up to a maximum of two). One mark for each point that is developed (up to a maximum of two). 3(c) Explain how formal agencies of social control deal with crime. 6 Possible answers: • police – suspected criminals are targeted and areas are monitored in order to deter and prevent crime; • police arrest – the police have the power of arrest and so can detain suspected criminals for investigation, thus dealing with crime; • courts – sentencing – in dealing with crime they decide upon innocence or guilt and then decide upon the appropriate sentence for the crime; • government – can alter existing laws and introduce new legislation in order to deal with a crime problem or a new form of crime; • surveillance – CCTV and police cameras may be used to monitor behaviour and to deter criminality; • punishment – negative sanctions can be imposed in order to ensure that crime is dealt with effectively e.g. prison, fines, corporal punishment; • prisons – incarceration – lock people away and remove their freedom and contact with family to prevent re-offending and so deal with crime; • prisons – crime within prisons can be dealt with through additional time added to sentences, solitary confinement, loss of privileges, etc.; • community sentencing – offenders have to give back to the community in some way (e.g. cleaning graffiti) and so learn from their mistakes – this deals with the problem of crime; • death penalty – the most severe crimes in some countries will be dealt with by the death penalty; • rehabilitation – counselling, addiction services, education and training may be offered through the criminal justice system to try and reduce offending and deal with the crime problem; • any other reasonable response. Band 0 [0 marks] No creditworthy response. Band 1 [1–3 marks] Answers in this band will show only a limited awareness of the question. Responses may be short and un/underdeveloped. At the bottom of the band (1 mark), expect one weak point. Higher in the band (2–3 marks), candidates may offer more than one weak point, but there may be a tendency towards simplistic answers, engaging with sociological ideas without using sociological language. Band 2 [4–6 marks] Answers in this band will have clear and accurate explanation, showing good sociological knowledge and understanding. Sociological terms and concepts should be expected and explained. At the bottom of the band, the range of points covered may be narrow or lack detail. Higher in the band, answers will cover more than one point in a well-developed way or cover several points in less detail. 3(d) Explain why white-collar crime often goes unreported. 8 Possible answers: • victims not aware – if the victims are not aware a crime has been committed then it will not be reported e.g. online fraud; • mutually beneficial – many white-collar crimes benefit the organisation as well as the individual and therefore are unlikely to be reported; • reputation – companies do not want to gain a bad reputation and therefore may choose to hide the crimes being committed in order to protect themselves from police scrutiny; • dealt with internally – white collar crimes are often dealt with internally by the organisation rather than reporting to the police; • normalisation – there are some areas of work where fraud and theft are normal e.g. tax evasion, fiddling expenses, and so such crimes will not be reported; • stereotypes – most white-collar criminals do not fit the stereotype of the ‘typical offender’ (Cicourel) and so are not suspected of committing crimes, making the reporting much less likely to occur; • power and status – those committing the crimes may be in powerful positions and therefore people may be reluctant to report them/the crime for fear of reprisals; • any other reasonable response. Band 0 [0 marks] No creditworthy response. Band 1 [1–3 marks] Answers in this band will show only a limited awareness of the question. A tendency to description is likely. Responses may be short and undeveloped and points stated without explanation. Sociological terms and concepts are unlikely to be used. At the bottom of the band (1 mark), expect one weak point. Higher in the band (2–3 marks), candidates may offer more than one weak point. Band 2 [4–6 marks] Answers in this band will show basic sociological knowledge and understanding. Responses maybe underdeveloped and lacking in range. At the bottom of the band, candidates are unlikely to use sociological terms and concepts accurately. Higher in the band, candidates may be beginning to use sociological terms and concepts with greater accuracy. However, some aspects of the answer may only be partially developed/explained. Band 3 [7–8 marks] Answers in this band will show good sociological knowledge and understanding and will be well-developed and explained. Sociological terms and concepts will be used accurately overall. Answers will be well-focused on the question and there will be a range of points presented. At the top of the band explanations will be clear throughout. 3(e) To what extent does gender socialisation explain why females commit 15 less crime than males? Possible answers: Arguments for: • Oakley – differential gender socialisation – processes such as canalisation and manipulation teach girls to be caring, gentle and maternal and males to be aggressive and active – much more similar to criminality – therefore females commit less crime; • male norms and values learnt through socialisation – these are often closely associated with criminal behaviour (Miller) e.g, toughness, unemotional, aggressive – this is the result of socialisation and explains the lower levels of offending for females than males; • family ideology – feminism – girls are socialised to believe that their role is to be family/home centred and to involve children – this is not compatible with criminality and so explains their lower levels of offending; • bedroom culture – McRobbie – females spend a lot more time than males in the private sphere and therefore are far less likely to be involved in criminality as they are socialised to see the home as their domain, whereas males, socialised to spend more time in the public sphere, are likely to commit more crime; • functionalism – sex-role theory (Parsons) – by being socialised to perform the expressive role females are gentle and caring, the opposite of criminals – the reverse is true for males in the instrumental role and so explains their criminality; • masculinity – feminists claim crime rates may be higher for males because there is pressure on them to act in a hegemonic masculine way from socialisation in the family and peer group, being criminal is an example of this and so explains their higher levels of offending unlike females who are socialised into more compliant femininity; • cult of femininity – feminists believe girls are socialised into an ideology of beauty and appearance, often through the media – this feminine identity where you are judged on your looks not your actions is less likely to lead to crime; • parental role models – boys see father committing crimes so imitate that themselves, whereas this isn’t the case for girls; • peer group – female peer groups are typically more conformist whereas male peer groups may exert peer pressure and socialise boys to commit crime e.g. criminal sub-cultures, gangs, anti-schools sub-cultures, etc.; • media role models – many criminal male role models can be found in the media, where committing crime and the successful lifestyle it brings is glamorised and de-stigmatised – this may socialise boys to accept criminal norms and values whereas role models for girls are less likely to be deviant; • media representations – the media creates ideals of males and females in society and whilst males may be seen in dangerous, criminal roles this is rarely the case for females – so teaching both genders their acceptable behaviours in society; • any other reasonable response. 3(e) Arguments against: • biological – males have more testosterone and a bigger physical build than females and so are more naturally inclined to criminality; • social control – Heidensohn – females have less freedom when they are young than males and so have less opportunities to commit crime; • ladettes – Jackson – her research shows how females are starting to adopt more masculine norms and values as society becomes more equal and so are committing more crimes; • rising female crime rates – the statistics show that female crime is rising as women move into the workplace and are subjected to financial pressures which goes against gender socialisation theory; • chivalry thesis – Pollak – perhaps females have always committed more crime than was realised, but they have got away with it because they do not fit the stereotype of a criminal and can manipulate the system with their femininity; • opportunity – females are less likely to be at work then males and so have less opportunities to commit crime e.g. white-collar; • public spaces – in some cultures females are more controlled in public spaces than males and so do not have the freedom to commit crime that a male does have; • material deprivation – shoplifting is a crime closely linked to females which implies that financial reasons may explain why some females commit crime, regardless of their socialisation; • strain theory – Merton – females may suffer less strain to anomie than males as they are not seen as the conventional breadwinner and thus this, rather than gender socialisation, may explain their lower levels of offending; • status frustration – Cohen – this subcultural theory suggests young working-class males are frustrated by their low status in society and thus turn to crime – nothing to do with gender socialisation; • Murray – inadequate socialisation – this New Right theory does consider socialisation important in determining whether an individual commits crime – boys living in female headed single parent families without male role models may turn to crime due to a lack of discipline and moral guidance; • expressive crimes – are often associated with females and are thought to be fueled by emotions/pre-menstrual syndrome, etc., not linked to gender socialisation; • any other reasonable response. Band 0 [0 marks] No creditworthy response. Band 1 [1–4 marks] Answers in this band may be vague and largely based on common sense showing limited knowledge of the debate. Use of sociological terms or concepts is very unlikely. Responses may be short, undeveloped and one- sided. Lower in the band (1–2 marks), expect one or two weak points. Higher in the band (3–4 marks) candidates may offer more than two points and provide a weak definition of key terms in the question. 3(e) Band 2 [5–8 marks] In this band candidates will show some basic knowledge of the debate. Alternatively, they may offer an answer which is list-like in nature but there will be no real attempt to assess the issues raised by the question. There may be limited/some use of sociological terms or concepts. Responses may be underdeveloped and lack range. Answers may be simplistic and two- sided or only cover one side of the debate. Lower in the band, the response may be rather narrow in the points covered and there may be some development. Higher in the band, more points are likely to be covered with some development. Alternatively, a list-like answer with some development covering both sides of the argument may score up to 8 marks. A one-sided answer cannot score higher than 8 marks. Band 3 [9–12 marks] Answers in this band will show good sociological knowledge and understanding of the debate. Sociological terms and concepts will be used with greater accuracy and/or frequency. For the most part, answers will be well-developed, focused on the questions and there will be a range of points presented. There will be a two-sided response but it may lack range on one side. At the bottom of the band, candidates may provide a narrower range of developed points. At the top of the band, expect a wider range of developed points and clear focus on the question. Band 4 [13–15 marks] Answers in this band will show excellent knowledge and understanding of the debate. There will be a strong grasp of the arguments as well as accurate and frequent use of sociological terms and concepts. Answers will be well- developed, clearly focused on the question and discuss a wide range of points. Responses will be two-sided and have a range of points on each side. At the bottom of the band (13 marks), the answer may lack a specific conclusion. Higher in the band, there will be a clear attempt to offer an assessment of the ‘To what extent.?’ part of the question through a focused conclusion.
2 There are many different types of education available to students, for example formal and informal. For many sociologists education is viewed positively as a way to improve a person’s life chances. Other sociologists are more critical of educational systems because of factors such as selection, elaborated code and labelling. (a) What is meant by the term ‘elaborated code’? [2] (b) Describe two ways education can improve life chances. [4] (c) Explain how formal education is different to informal education. [6] (d) Explain why some sociologists claim that selective education is unfair. [8] (e) To what extent is educational achievement affected by labelling? [15] Section C: Crime, deviance and social control
35 marks
Mark scheme: 2(a) What is meant by the term ‘elaborated code’? 2 One mark for a partial definition, e.g. speaking posh. Two marks for a clear definition, e.g. a form of language used in formal contexts such as examinations. 2(b) Describe two ways education can improve life chances. 4 Possible answers: • financially – education can lead to earning more money and achieving more wealth; • status – a good education can allow people to climb the social hierarchy and so achieve higher status and more self-esteem and self-confidence; • employment – education opens the door to many more types of employment giving the individual choice and freedom; • social networks – as a person goes higher in the education system they expand their range of social networks meaning they have more potentially useful social contacts later in life; • cultural capital (Bourdieu) – the more educated a person is, the more cultural capital they have and as this is highly valued by society it is likely to improve a person’s life chances; • housing – if education leads to more economic capital then this allows individuals to get onto the housing ladder/live in better areas/conditions; • travel – education often offers opportunities for extended travel – school trips, work experience placements, a year abroad, etc. – these all offer better opportunities to the person; • any other reasonable response. One mark for each point correctly identified (up to a maximum of two). One mark for each point that is developed (up to a maximum of two). 2(c) Explain how formal education is different to informal education. 6 Possible answers: • formal education is taught in schools/educational establishments – informal education can happen in communities, at home, through daily interactions, etc.; • formal education is based on a set, agreed syllabus of content that has to be taught, informal education is flexible and is not prescribed; • formal education is assessed through examinations or controlled assessment or coursework based on universally agreed standards – informal education is not; • informal education may be referred to as the hidden curriculum, what children learn in schools that is not part of the formal lesson content (formal education) e.g. punctuality, respect, manners, etc. – formal education is explicit and structured; • informal education may be more about socialisation and culture, whereas formal education is about prescribed content learning; • any other reasonable response. Band 0 [0 marks] No creditworthy response. Band 1 [1–3 marks] Answers in this band will show only a limited awareness of the question. Responses may be short and un/underdeveloped. At the bottom of the band (1 mark), expect one weak point. Higher in the band (2–3 marks), candidates may offer more than one weak point, but there may be a tendency towards simplistic answers, engaging with sociological ideas without using sociological language. Band 2 [4–6 marks] Answers in this band will have clear and accurate explanation, showing good sociological knowledge and understanding. Sociological terms and concepts should be expected and explained. At the bottom of the band, the range of points covered may be narrow or lack detail. Higher in the band, answers will cover more than one point in a well-developed way or cover several points in less detail. 2(d) Explain why some sociologists claim that selective education is unfair. 8 Possible answers: • grammar schools – sitting an 11+ exam whilst still in primary school is thought to be unfair as a student’s educational map is decided at such a young age – this prevents the majority of students having access to what many describe as the ‘best’ educational opportunities; • 11+ examination – this is criticised by many sociologists as a form of selection as it is said to measure cultural capital rather than intelligence; • selection tests – any selective school that chooses who to admit based on a test result can be criticised as parents with the funds employ private tutors to help and guide their children to pass the test – this results in far more middle-class children passing selection tests than working class, which is not fair; • private schools – to get into private school you have to typically pass an exam but also have the money to be able to afford the school fees – this process of selection is considered unfair as it disadvantages poorer young people (private schools get very good exam results); • faith schools – selection can also be based on religion which prevents many children from attending certain schools – faith schools are often associated with high results and therefore this may be perceived as unfair; • tripartite system – this three-tier system was in place in the UK prior to 1965 – depending on a primary school test result, students were divided into three groups and sent to the most appropriate school – this prevented many students from achieving social mobility; • life chances – by not being selected for a certain type of school a young person’s life chances can be hampered and many sociologists believe this is not fair; • equal opportunities – selection tests go against the notion that all young people should have equal opportunities to be successful in education; • Marxism – they believe that the process of selection favours the higher classes (materially and culturally) and therefore allows social class inequalities to be reproduced and maintained; • labelling – the process of selection creates ‘winners and losers’ and to categorise someone as a success or a failure at such a young age is not fair and could be very damaging; • any other reasonable response. Band 0 [0 marks] No creditworthy response. Band 1 [1–3 marks] Answers in this band will show only a limited awareness of the question. A tendency to description is likely. Responses may be short and undeveloped and points stated without explanation. Sociological terms and concepts are unlikely to be used. At the bottom of the band (1 mark), expect one weak point. Higher in the band (2–3 marks), candidates may offer more than one weak point. 2(d) Band 2 [4–6 marks] Answers in this band will show basic sociological knowledge and understanding. Responses maybe underdeveloped and lacking in range. At the bottom of the band, candidates are unlikely to use sociological terms and concepts accurately. Higher in the band, candidates may be beginning to use sociological terms and concepts with greater accuracy. However, some aspects of the answer may only be partially developed/explained. Band 3 [7–8 marks] Answers in this band will show good sociological knowledge and understanding and will be well-developed and explained. Sociological terms and concepts will be used accurately overall. Answers will be well-focused on the question and there will be a range of points presented. At the top of the band explanations will be clear throughout. 2(e) To what extent is educational achievement affected by labelling? 15 Possible answers: Arguments for: • Becker – his research shows that teachers judge students on non- academic factors, such as speech, dress and personality, and these together form a stereotype of the ideal pupil which influences a teacher’s assessment of a students’ ability so affecting educational achievement; • social class – this is thought to be a big influence on the teacher’s judgement of the student as students from working class homes are often seen as poorly motivated and lacking parental support therefore teachers conclude they are not academically able and treat them this way (opposite for the middle class) which can affect educational achievement; • ethnicity – pupils from ethnic minorities may be more likely to be negatively labelled by teachers and placed into lower sets – UK research on Afro-Caribbean students showed this – which can negatively affect educational achievement; • ethnicity – alternatively Archer’s research on Chinese students shows that when teachers have high expectations and positively label a social group, achievement can be high; • gender – boys – teachers are more likely to label boys as problems and as trouble and they have much higher rates of exclusion – these negative labels may account for the under-achievement of many boys in schools; • gender – girls – teachers may label girls as well behaved and cooperative which can lead to positive labels and high achievement or they may believe they are likely to leave education early and pursue family life and motherhood which would lower expectations and educational success; • setting and streaming – a result of teacher labelling can be the set or stream that a student finds themselves in – this alters teacher expectations of the students, may determine examination tier entry and can affect student confidence and motivation as well as their educational achievement; • self-fulfilling prophecy – Rosenthal and Jacobson – research showed that negative labels from teachers (despite the original ability of the student) resulted in a lack of student progress and thus lower educational achievement; • halo effect – a student who is constantly told they are bright, doing well, etc. will live up to this positive label and will achieve; • self-negating prophecy – being labelled negatively can cause a student to reject and resist that label in order to do well and prove teachers wrong – so the reaction to the label does affect educational achievement; • master status – the result of teacher labelling may be that the student fully accepts that label and that becomes their identity – how they think of themselves and how others think of them – this will then affect educational achievement; • peers – students may be labelled by their peers as a ‘nerd’ or a ‘swot’ and in order to avoid bullying or social exclusion, students may stop working hard, thus negatively affecting their educational achievement; • peers – students may be labelled as ‘unintelligent’ or ‘odd’ by their peers meaning they are not welcomed into group work and feel socially isolated – this may lead them to withdraw or be truant and so negatively affect educational achievement; 2(e) • peers – being labelled positively by classmates e.g. as ‘bright’ or ‘ambitious’ may encourage students to continue working and trying hard and so positively effect educational achievement; • any other reasonable response. Arguments Against: • material factors – having money to buy additional study resources, technology, software, private tutors, etc. may be more influential than labelling (Marxism); • family background – how much parents value education and their engagement with the school e.g. supporting fundraisers, attending parents evenings, etc. may be more influential than labelling (cultural deprivation/cultural factors); • cultural factors – having cultural capital (Bourdieu) and seeing the need for deferred gratification may be more influential than labelling on achievement; • peer group – for adolescents, fitting in and being accepted by the peer group is vital and this may affect classroom behaviour, homework completion, etc. (anti-school and pro-school subcultures) not the act of being labelled; • ability – educational achievement may be determined by the students natural ability and how hard they work (functionalism), not teacher labelling; • type of school – it may not be labelling that determines educational success but the type of school the student attends e.g. private schools typically get better results than state schools; • linguistics – the language code used and understood by students may be key to educational success e.g. elaborated vs restricted codes – not the labelling process; • too deterministic – labelling theory may be too deterministic – individuals do not have to accept or follow the labels they have been given, they can resist and choose their own path; • any other reasonable response. Band 0 [0 marks] No creditworthy response. Band 1 [1–4 marks] Answers in this band may be vague and largely based on common sense showing limited knowledge of the debate. Use of sociological terms or concepts is very unlikely. Responses may be short, undeveloped and one- sided. Lower in the band (1–2 marks), expect one or two weak points. Higher in the band (3–4 marks) candidates may offer more than two points and provide a weak definition of key terms in the question. 2(e) Band 2 [5–8 marks] In this band candidates will show some basic knowledge of the debate. Alternatively, they may offer an answer which is list-like in nature but there will be no real attempt to assess the issues raised by the question. There may be limited/some use of sociological terms or concepts. Responses may be underdeveloped and lack range. Answers may be simplistic and two-sided or only cover one side of the debate. Lower in the band, the response may be rather narrow in the points covered and there may be some development. Higher in the band, more points are likely to be covered with some development. Alternatively, a list-like answer with some development covering both sides of the argument may score up to 8 marks. A one-sided answer cannot score higher than 8 marks. Band 3 [9–12 marks] Answers in this band will show good sociological knowledge and understanding of the debate. Sociological terms and concepts will be used with greater accuracy and/or frequency. For the most part, answers will be well-developed, focused on the questions and there will be a range of points presented. There will be a two sided response but it may lack range on one side. At the bottom of the band, candidates may provide a narrower range of developed points. At the top of the band, expect a wider range of developed points and clear focus on the question. Band 4 [13–15 marks] Answers in this band will show excellent knowledge and understanding of the debate. There will be a strong grasp of the arguments as well as accurate and frequent use of sociological terms and concepts. Answers will be well- developed, clearly focused on the question and discuss a wide range of points. Responses will be two-sided and have a range of points on each side. At the bottom of the band (13 marks), the answer may lack a specific conclusion. Higher in the band, there will be a clear attempt to offer an assessment of the ‘To what extent.?’ part of the question through a focused conclusion.
4 Different factors affect how people use the media, such as gender and social class. Censorship also affects media consumption. Some sociologists claim that digital technology and the internet have changed how the audience uses the media. However, the media remains an influential agent of social control. The media is still criticised by many sociologists for the creation of moral panics and stereotypes. (a) What is meant by the term ‘social control’? [2] (b) Describe two examples of censorship in the media. [4] (c) Explain how patterns of media use differ according to social class. [6] (d) Explain why moral panics are often seen in the media. [8] (e) To what extent has the internet changed how the audience use the media? [15]
35 marks
Mark scheme: 4(a) What is meant by the term ‘social control’? 2 One mark for a partial definition, e.g. making people do things. Two marks for a clear definition, e.g. the ways in which society regulates individual and group behaviour. 4(b) Describe two examples of censorship in the media. 4 Possible answers: • not reporting criticism of the government, its leaders or its policies; • not reporting opinions and actions of those opposing the government and their reasons/evidence for this; • laws protecting the state e.g. Official Secrets Act introduced to protect the Nation’s security; • libel and slander laws – prevent the media from making unfounded allegations against individuals; • laws preventing prejudice and discrimination against ethnic and other minorities in the media; • laws against obscenity/child pornography, etc.; • TV watershed/film and gaming certification preventing unsuitable material being available to children; • media acts as a mouthpiece of the state and bans or severely limits independent journalism, not allowing other views; • some countries restrict people’s access to the internet; • any other reasonable response. One mark for each point correctly identified (up to a maximum of two). One mark for each point that is developed (up to a maximum of two). 4(c) Explain how patterns of media use differ according to social class. 6 Possible answers: • newspapers – tabloids are seen to be working class newspapers representing the ‘working man’, whereas broadsheets are thought to contain more quality and serious journalism and are associated with the higher social classes – different social classes therefore use newspapers (print and online) differently; • literacy – lower social classes are less likely to have the literacy skills necessary for reading a newspaper/complex magazine journalism, unlike the higher social classes (Bernstein – elaborated code); • TV – the lower social classes are said to consume entertainment such as soap operas, game shows and reality TV compared to the documentaries, news and financial programmes watched by the higher classes; • channels – the lower social classes are thought to consume the more mainstream/mass appeal channels (broadcasting) whereas the higher classes are more likely to consume specialist interest/niche programming (narrowcasting); • content – the lower social classes are said by Marxists to consume sports, entertainment and trivia in order to distract them from the more serious issues of politics and economics – this is not the same for the higher social classes; • internet cost – a digital divide exists in some countries between different social classes and their use of the internet because of the cost; • entertainment based social media is widely consumed amongst the lower social classes – consumption is not so high in the higher classes and is more likely to be linked to professional forums/platforms instead; • any other reasonable response. Band 0 [0 marks] No creditworthy response. Band 1 [1–3 marks] Answers in this band will show only a limited awareness of the question. Responses may be short and un/underdeveloped. At the bottom of the band (1 mark), expect one weak point. Higher in the band (2–3 marks), candidates may offer more than one weak point, but there may be a tendency towards simplistic answers, engaging with sociological ideas without using sociological language. Band 2 [4–6 marks] Answers in this band will have clear and accurate explanation, showing good sociological knowledge and understanding. Sociological terms and concepts should be expected and explained. At the bottom of the band, the range of points covered may be narrow or lack detail. Higher in the band, answers will cover more than one point in a well-developed way or cover several points in less detail. 4(d) Explain why moral panics are often seen in the media. 8 Possible answers: • stereotyping – moral panics often feature stereotyped folk devils who fit the public perception of ‘being bad’ e.g. teenagers, knife gangs, extremists, etc.; • sensationalism – moral panics are able to provoke strong public reactions and thus can provide dramatic narratives and characters for the media which help sell products; • news values – moral panics often contain several recognised news values which make stories featuring them more likely to appeal to the public e.g. conflict, disaster, shock tactics, death, violence, etc.; • binary opposition – moral panics typically feature a ‘them and us’ element and allow the media to reinforce widely held popular beliefs e.g. the generation gap; • pluralism – moral panics give the audience what they want i.e. drama, sensationalism, conflict, etc.; • Marxism – moral panics create entertainment in the media which diverts the consumer from the more serious issues affecting the nation/individual e.g. politics, economics, social issues, etc. – media ownership tends to lie with the higher social classes; • social change – moral panics often indicate that some members of society are calling for social change (e.g. BLM) and can be used as a vehicle to promote that or, alternatively, as an excuse for further social control; • profit – moral panics often feature in the media in order to sell more newspaper copies or to engage the audience with the story and the product; • scapegoating – moral panics give the public a social group to blame for some societal problem – this simplified and biased approach is easily understood and offers opportunities for distorted reporting; • any other reasonable response. Band 0 [0 marks] No creditworthy response. Band 1 [1–3 marks] Answers in this band will show only a limited awareness of the question. A tendency to description is likely. Responses may be short and undeveloped and points stated without explanation. Sociological terms and concepts are unlikely to be used. At the bottom of the band (1 mark), expect one weak point. Higher in the band (2–3 marks), candidates may offer more than one weak point. Band 2 [4–6 marks] Answers in this band will show basic sociological knowledge and understanding. Responses maybe underdeveloped and lacking in range. At the bottom of the band, candidates are unlikely to use sociological terms and concepts accurately. Higher in the band, candidates maybe beginning to use sociological terms and concepts with greater accuracy. However, some aspects of the answer may only be partially developed/explained. 4(d) Band 3 [7–8 marks] Answers in this band will show good sociological knowledge and understanding and will be well-developed and explained. Sociological terms and concepts will be used accurately overall. Answers will be well-focused on the question and there will be a range of points presented. At the top of the band explanations will be clear throughout. 4(e) To what extent has the internet changed how the audience use the 15 media? Possible answers: Arguments for: • interactivity – the audience are no longer passive media consumers but active, creative participants in the media culture; • streaming/downloading – audiences are able to access on-demand a huge range of globally diverse content and genres; • platforms – there has been a huge increase in the number of platforms available for the audience to consume media through the internet; • devices – the internet allows for media consumption on a wide range of different devices, allowing it to be consumed ‘on-the-go’ e.g. smart- phones, laptops, etc.; • personalisation – the internet allows for media consumption to be tracked (e.g. cookies) meaning that personal recommendations for viewing/listening can be made based on prior media consumption history e.g. Amazon; • social media – the internet has led to a huge rise in the audience’s use of social media for entertainment, information, work, education, etc.; • the internet has led to what Turkle calls being ‘alone together’ – media consumption is an increasingly isolated, virtual experience; • audience as producer – user generated content, influencers, citizen journalism have all changed the role of the audience in the media; • narrowcasting – the internet has made it possible for audiences to consume more specialist, niche products than previously; • decline of traditional media – fewer people read newspapers and print products, watch broadcast and scheduled TV preferring instead to choose digital products with greater audience choice/flexibility; • any other reasonable response. Arguments against: • digital divide – this has been exacerbated through the internet, so increasing the divide between the rich and the poor/the old and the young, etc. – the internet has therefore not changed how these excluded social groups use the media; • not everyone consumes the media through the internet e.g. the elderly – for these people the internet has not affected their media consumption; • passive audience – models such as the hypodermic syringe show that the audience still passively consume media content, this has not changed through the internet; • social groups – any changes to media consumption will be dependent on the social group referred to e.g. gender, social class, location, ethnicity, age, etc.; • the internet co-exists alongside traditional media and therefore for many consumers is simply an additional option, not something that has changed media usage; • user generated content – in reality it is only small numbers of consumers who create and upload their own media, most consumers continue to consume media output made by others; • gender differences – the internet has not changed the fact that females are more likely to use the media for entertainment and males for information/sports; 4(e) • traditional media is still hugely popular amongst many people across the globe and shows no signs of dying out; • global inequalities – access to the internet is neither universal nor equal therefore it is inaccurate to present a generalised picture of the internet changing media consumption; • platforms not usage – for many consumers the internet has not really changed how the media is used, just the platforms it is used upon e.g. laptop rather than TV – but still used for entertainment; • any other reasonable response. Band 0 [0 marks] No creditworthy response. Band 1 [1–4 marks] Answers in this band may be vague and largely based on common sense showing limited knowledge of the debate. Use of sociological terms or concepts is very unlikely. Responses may be short, undeveloped and one- sided. Lower in the band (1–2 marks), expect one or two weak points. Higher in the band (3–4 marks) candidates may offer more than two points and provide a weak definition of key terms in the question. Band 2 [5–8 marks] In this band candidates will show some basic knowledge of the debate. Alternatively, they may offer an answer which is list-like in nature but there will be no real attempt to assess the issues raised by the question. There may be limited/some use of sociological terms or concepts. Responses may be underdeveloped and lack range. Answers may be simplistic and two-sided or only cover one side of the debate. Lower in the band, the response may be rather narrow in the points covered and there may be some development. Higher in the band, more points are likely to be covered with some development. Alternatively, a list-like answer with some development covering both sides of the argument may score up to 8 marks. A one-sided answer cannot score higher than 8 marks. Band 3 [9–12 marks] Answers in this band will show good sociological knowledge and understanding of the debate. Sociological terms and concepts will be used with greater accuracy and/or frequency. For the most part, answers will be well-developed, focused on the questions and there will be a range of points presented. There will be a two-sided response but it may lack range on one side. At the bottom of the band, candidates may provide a narrower range of developed points. At the top of the band, expect a wider range of developed points and clear focus on the question. Band 4 [13–15 marks] Answers in this band will show excellent knowledge and understanding of the debate. There will be a strong grasp of the arguments as well as accurate and frequent use of sociological terms and concepts. Answers will be well- developed, clearly focused on the question and discuss a wide range of points. Responses will be two-sided and have a range of points on each side. At the bottom of the band (13 marks), the answer may lack a specific conclusion. Higher in the band, there will be a clear attempt to offer an assessment of the ‘To what extent.?’ part of the question through a focused conclusion.
3 There are many different types of crime, for example cybercrime and urban crime. Sociologists debate why some social groups commit more crime than others and some believe that policing is biased. Measurements of crime such as victim surveys reveal that a dark figure of crime exists. (a) What is meant by the term ‘cybercrime’? [2] (b) Describe two features of the dark figure of crime. [4] (c) Explain how the findings from victim surveys may not be accurate. [6] (d) Explain why inadequate socialisation can be linked to crime. [8] (e) To what extent is policing biased? [15] Section D: Media
35 marks
Mark scheme: 3(a) What is meant by the term ‘cybercrime’? 2 One mark for partial definition e.g. online fraud. Two marks for clear definition e.g. crimes involving the use of new technologies like the internet. 3(b) Describe two features of the dark figure of crime. 4 Possible answers: unreported crimes – not all crimes are reported to the police by the public due to fear of reprisals by the perpetrators e.g. in communities where crime is rife; unreported crimes – not all crimes are reported to the police by the public because the criminals are friends or family members and this leads to conflicted loyalties; unrecorded crimes – the police do not record all crimes that are reported to them due to police discretion and pressure on the police to ‘clear up’ crimes (coughing and cuffing); sexual crimes – these are notoriously underreported due to victim embarrassment and a culture whereby sexual crimes rarely result in a conviction; recognition of a crime taking place – often people are unsure if they have actually been the victim of crime e.g. online crimes/scams therefore they are never reported; any other reasonable response. One mark for each point correctly identified (up to maximum of two). One mark for each point that is developed (up to a maximum of two). 3(c) Explain how the findings from victim surveys may not be accurate. 6 Possible answers: memory – victim surveys rely on respondent’s memories which may be faulty – this reduces their validity; cannot cover all types of crimes – they do not usually cover victimless crimes e.g. drug use, crimes against children and crimes against organisations. Therefore, they only give a partial picture of the victims of crimes; national picture – most victim surveys are completed using respondents from all over a nation – this does not show the impact or seriousness of crime in localised areas of a country; quantitative data – the most common type of victim surveys are large scale and produce quantitative data e.g. the CSEW or BCS – these cannot explore the responses or feelings of victims to crime; local victim surveys – these are carried out in a specific local area and therefore cannot be representative of the wider population so making generalisations impossible e.g. the Islington survey; feminist victim surveys – e.g. Walklate – these can be criticised for focusing only on sexual crimes and not considering the impact of other kinds of crimes on victims; underreported crimes – some types of crimes e.g. sexual crimes, are still thought to be underreported in victim surveys due to people not wanting to talk to strangers about such an intimate, personal experience; any other reasonable response. Band 0 [0 marks] No creditworthy response. Band 1 [1–3 marks] Answers in this band will show only a limited awareness of the question. Responses may be short and un/underdeveloped. At the bottom of the band (1 mark), expect one weak point. Higher in the band (2–3 marks), candidates may offer more than one weak point, but there may be a tendency towards simplistic answers, engaging with sociological ideas without using sociological language. Band 2 [4–6 marks] Answers in this band will have clear and accurate explanation, showing good sociological knowledge and understanding. Sociological terms and concepts should be expected and explained. At the bottom of the band, the range of points covered may be narrow or lack detail. Higher in the band, answers will cover more than one point in a well-developed way or cover several points in less detail. 3(d) Explain why inadequate socialisation can be linked to crime. 8 Possible answers: decline in the nuclear family – New Right sociologists claim that since the nuclear family has started to decline so socialisation in families has become less effective in terms of inculcating the necessary moral values and this has led to increases in crime; single-parent families – Murray claims the lack of a male role model to discipline children has led to inadequate socialisation of boys in families and to increased levels of male crime; decline in marriage – as cohabitation and other alternatives to marriage have become more normalised, some sociologists claim that socialisation has become inadequate as the family is seen to be less stable and certain – this leads to crime; underclass values – Murray claims that the formation of the underclass who inadequately socialise their children to be work shy, feckless and welfare dependent has led to increases in crime as they desire material items but are unwilling to work to get them; official crime statistics – these indicate high rates of offending from families with so-called ‘inadequate socialisation’ i.e. the poor and those from single parent families; longitudinal studies – these typically show a link between poor parenting and/or children living in care (inadequate socialisation) and criminal offending; Hirschi – functionalist Hirschi claims that offending occurs in those individuals who have weak bonds of attachment i.e. those who have been inadequately socialised; illegitimate opportunity structure – Cloward and Ohlin - their research shows that crime flourishes in areas where it is normalised suggesting that the socialisation process is inadequate as it makes crime seem an acceptable ‘career’; feral children – research indicates that children who are not adequately socialised can become feral and act in immoral ways such as committing crime; any other reasonable response. 3(d) Band 0 [0 marks] No creditworthy response. Band 1 [1–3 marks] Answers in this band will show only a limited awareness of the question. A tendency to description is likely. Responses may be short and undeveloped and points stated without explanation. Sociological terms and concepts are unlikely to be used. At the bottom of the band (1 mark), expect one weak point. Higher in the band (2–3 marks), candidates may offer more than one weak point. Band 2 [4–6 marks] Answers in this band will show basic sociological knowledge and understanding. Responses maybe underdeveloped and lacking in range. At the bottom of the band, candidates are unlikely to use sociological terms and concepts accurately. Higher in the band, candidates may be beginning to use sociological terms and concepts with greater accuracy. However, some aspects of the answer may only be partially developed/explained. Band 3 [7–8 marks] Answers in this band will show good sociological knowledge and understanding and will be well-developed and explained. Sociological terms and concepts will be used accurately overall. Answers will be well-focused on the question and there will be a range of points presented. At the top of the band explanations will be clear throughout. 3(e) To what extent is policing biased? 15 Possible answers: Arguments for: police discretion – the police can decide whether to arrest someone and what to charge them with. This is often based on stereotypical assumptions of who the criminal is (Cicourel, ‘Typical Delinquent’); police targeting – the police have biased ideas about where crime will take place (urban, deprived areas) and deploy resources accordingly – this means the lower social classes are more likely to be caught committing crime than the higher classes; stop and search rates – these are much higher for some social groups than others e.g. high rates for the young, the poor and ethnic minorities, showing how policing is biased; type of crime – the police are subject to pressure to crack down on crime and get good clear up rates – this means they tend to focus their attention on the crimes that are relatively easy to solve, meaning business and white-collar crime is not particularly targeted – this of course demonstrates bias; Marxism – the police are seen to be a tool for the ruling class, they ignore elite/state/corporate crimes and instead repress the working class into a state of submission and conformity – police are part of the repressive state apparatus and are therefore biased; feminism – this theory says policing favours men over women when it comes to the extremely low arrest, investigation and conviction rates for sexual crimes e.g. rape, harassment; chivalry factor – Pollak – this theory suggests that the police are biased in favour of females, believing them to be incapable of serious crime due to the long-standing stereotypes of passive femininity; moral panics – the media sensationalises some crimes and creates folk devils of who the criminals are, e.g. young, black males – this diverts attention away from the real criminals (the upper class) and creates stereotypes for the public; selective law enforcement – actions of the working class are criminalised and so the ruling class are less likely to have their criminal actions defined as such, e.g. the police focus on street crime rather than corporate crime and so are biased; corporate crime - Tombs and Whyte – only 5% of workplace crimes involving breaking laws on safety at work that result in serious injury or death are investigated by the police. This compares to an investigation rate of over 90% for crimes involving serious injury outside of the workplace; ethnicity – investigations into police racism and prejudice has shown that some ethnic minority groups are over-policed. This was demonstrated in the London riots of 2011 and in recent global BLM protests and examples of police brutality; any other reasonable response. 3(e) Arguments against: official crime statistics – the police simply act upon the information they are given by the official records which shows that some social groups e.g. the ruling class do not commit much crime (functionalism); police wear body cameras/CCTV – surveillance is used to ensure the police act fairly and therefore prevents cases of bias; police themselves are being prosecuted for wrongdoings – if members of the police commit crimes they are now arrested, charged and often prosecuted, showing that policing is not biased e.g. Sarah Everard murder case; individuals not the institution – every profession will contain biased individuals, e.g. racists, but this does not mean that the police force itself as an institution is biased; harm – white-collar crimes are less likely to cause harm to the victim and therefore it is only right that the police focus their attention on street crimes, this is what the public want as it’s a source of fear. This is not bias, it’s responding to public demand; area – the police are not deliberately targeting certain areas, they are acting on information that tells them where crime is most likely to be committed – this, not selective law enforcement and bias, is why they are found in deprived rather than higher class areas; ethnicity – the police have been accused of over-policing ethnic minorities however records and witness statements suggest that some ethnic minorities are more likely to be criminal therefore the police are simply doing their job e.g. focus on black knife crime in the UK; corporate criminals – when information is forthcoming the police can and do investigate large corporations and powerful groups and ensure that the criminals are arrested and charged, e.g. 2022 members of the UK Conservative party charged with breaking Covid-19 rules; social movements – the police back changes in society that see the focus of policing shifting e.g. #metoo saw the arrests of powerful male sex-crime perpetrators and demonstrates that policing is not biased; regulation and the law – the police are agents for the law and ensure it is followed fairly; were they to police in an unfair way then they would be subject to arrest and prosecution themselves; police personnel – the police have responded to criticisms of their actions by trying to ensure greater representation amongst their ranks from all social groups in order to create a fairer police force e.g. recruitment drives of ethnic minority and female police officers to remove bias; any other reasonable response. 3(e) Band 0 [0 marks] No creditworthy response. Band 1 [1–4 marks] Answers in this band may be vague and largely based on common sense showing limited knowledge of the debate. Use of sociological terms or concepts is very unlikely. Responses may be short, undeveloped and one- sided. Lower in the band (1–2 marks), expect one or two weak points. Higher in the band (3–4 marks) candidates may offer more than two points and provide a weak definition of key terms in the question. Band 2 [5–8 marks] In this band candidates will show some basic knowledge of the debate. Alternatively, they may offer an answer which is list-like in nature but there will be no real attempt to assess the issues raised by the question. There may be limited/some use of sociological terms or concepts. Responses may be underdeveloped and lack range. Answers may be simplistic and two-sided or only cover one side of the debate. Lower in the band, the response may be rather narrow in the points covered and there may be some development. Higher in the band, more points are likely to be covered with some development. Alternatively, a list-like answer with some development covering both sides of the argument may score up to 8 marks. A one-sided answer cannot score higher than 8 marks. Band 3 [9–12 marks] Answers in this band will show good sociological knowledge and understanding of the debate. Sociological terms and concepts will be used with greater accuracy and/or frequency. For the most part, answers will be well- developed, focused on the questions and there will be a range of points presented. There will be a two-sided response but it may lack range on one side. At the bottom of the band, candidates may provide a narrower range of developed points. At the top of the band, expect a wider range of developed points and clear focus on the question. Band 4 [13–15 marks] Answers in this band will show excellent knowledge and understanding of the debate. There will be a strong grasp of the arguments as well as accurate and frequent use of sociological terms and concepts. Answers will be well- developed, clearly focused on the question and discuss a wide range of points. Responses will be two-sided and have a range of points on each side. At the bottom of the band (13 marks), the answer may lack a specific conclusion. Higher in the band, there will be a clear attempt to offer an assessment of the ‘To what extent?’ part of the question through a focused conclusion.
2 Girls and boys often study different subjects in schools. Educational achievement is not the same for everyone and many sociologists argue that this is because of linguistic factors. Vocationalism is now an important feature of most education systems. Many countries have laws that ensure equality of opportunities in education. (a) What is meant by the term ‘vocationalism’? [2] (b) Describe two examples of equal opportunities in education. [4] (c) Explain how rewards are used by schools to socially control students. [6] (d) Explain why girls often study different subjects to boys. [8] (e) To what extent do linguistic factors have the most influence on a student’s educational achievement? [15] Section C: Crime, deviance and social control
35 marks
Mark scheme: 2(a) What is meant by the term ‘vocationalism’? 2 One mark for partial definition e.g. work experience. Two marks for clear definition e.g. vocational education prepares people for work or trains them for particular jobs or careers. 2(b) Describe two examples of equal opportunities in education. 4 Possible answers: meritocracy – you will be setted/get results based on your effort and ability; national curriculum – all students must follow the same curriculum for core subjects which is fair and equal; free education – in many societies education is free to all, regardless of background e.g. state schools; subject choice – all students in a school have the same choice of subjects, regardless of social factors; social mobility – upward and downward mobility is a feature of life for everybody, based on educational success; comprehensive schools – these were set up to offer equality of education to all students in a local area; compensatory education – many schools use schemes such as bursaries and/or scholarships in order to ensure all social groups get equal opportunities for success (positive discrimination); co-ed teaching/schools – offering girls and boys the same educational opportunities and curriculum; any other reasonable response. One mark for each point correctly identified (up to a maximum of two). One mark for each point that is developed (up to a maximum of two). 2(c) Explain how rewards are used by schools to socially control students. 6 Possible answers: praise, stickers, badges – can all be used to encourage socially approved behaviours and values in schools; socialisation – rewards in schools socialise students into their social expectations e.g. to use good manners will result in something positive happening/being said; being positively labelled at school – encourages social conformity as the student desires further rewards (the halo effect); manipulation – rewards allow schools to influence and control the thoughts and actions of children into believing the status quo/not rebelling (ideological control) treat trips – students can be rewarded by being allowed to go on trips if they are good/achieve certain marks; setting – if students work hard and follow the rules, they may be rewarded by moving up to a higher set or gaining better results; assemblies – these may be used to publicly congratulate and reward students who have exceeded targets/been good citizens etc. thus producing a culture whereby rewards are seen to be desirable; any other reasonable response. Band 0 [0 marks] No creditworthy response. Band 1 [1–3 marks] Answers in this band will show only a limited awareness of the question. Responses may be short and un/underdeveloped. At the bottom of the band (1 mark), expect one weak point. Higher in the band (2–3 marks), candidates may offer more than one weak point, but there may be a tendency towards simplistic answers, engaging with sociological ideas without using sociological language. Band 2 [4–6 marks] Answers in this band will have clear and accurate explanation, showing good sociological knowledge and understanding. Sociological terms and concepts should be expected and explained. At the bottom of the band, the range of points covered may be narrow or lack detail. Higher in the band, answers will cover more than one point in a well-developed way or cover several points in less detail. 2(d) Explain why girls often study different subjects to boys? 8 Possible answers: feminism – girls are prepared for their traditional gender role as nurturer through subjects such as cooking and sewing, boys are prepared for their instrumental role through ‘harder’ subjects such as physics and economics; gendered role models – in schools head teachers and senior staff are often male which may encourage boys to choose subjects to study that could be equated with leadership and authority in the future e.g. those subjects perceived as ‘academic’ or ‘difficult’ – the reverse may be seen for girls; teacher expectations – teachers may have higher expectations of boys and encourage them to aim for a career through their subject choices whereas they may assume the future for girls is marriage and motherhood and thus be less inclined to encourage study of the more academic subjects; careers advice – careers advice may be based on traditional gender stereotypes; thus girls may be pushed into different subjects than boys to match these careers; home factors – parental pressure and attitudes are likely to affect the subjects that boys and girls choose to study at school; gendered socialisation – Ann Oakley – processes such as canalisation and manipulation begin at home and may affect the aspirations and future goals of boys and girls, e.g. girls encouraged to be nurturing and feminine so choose health and social care, boys encouraged to be active and adventurous so choose PE; cultural factors – the pupil’s cultural norms and values are likely to affect subject choice at school e.g. cultures where girls are seen as having careers and being independent are likely to socialise girls differently than those where marriage and motherhood is the norm; single-sex schools – single-sex schools may offer a curriculum based upon the perceived needs of the gender they are catering for e.g. girls schools may be more likely to offer needlework, textiles and childcare and boys schools engineering, woodwork and economics; any other reasonable response. Band 0 [0 marks] No creditworthy response. Band 1 [1–3 marks] Answers in this band will show only a limited awareness of the question. A tendency to description is likely. Responses may be short and undeveloped and points stated without explanation. Sociological terms and concepts are unlikely to be used. At the bottom of the band (1 mark), expect one weak point. Higher in the band (2–3 marks), candidates may offer more than one weak point. 2(d) Band 2 [4–6 marks] Answers in this band will show basic sociological knowledge and understanding. Responses may be underdeveloped and lacking in range. At the bottom of the band, candidates are unlikely to use sociological terms and concepts accurately. Higher in the band, candidates may be beginning to use sociological terms and concepts with greater accuracy. However, some aspects of the answer may only be partially developed/explained. Band 3 [7–8 marks] Answers in this band will show good sociological knowledge and understanding and will be well-developed and explained. Sociological terms and concepts will be used accurately overall. Answers will be well-focused on the question and there will be a range of points presented. At the top of the band explanations will be clear throughout. 2(e) To what extent do linguistic factors have the most influence on a 15 student’s educational achievement? Possible answers: Arguments for: social class – Bernstein’s restricted code – informal, everyday language with limited vocab spoken widely by the lower social classes that is discouraged in schools – this could negatively influence opportunities for working class educational achievement as this is not the language of education; social class – Bernstein’s elaborated code – expresses complex and abstract ideas, a formal style of language used in schools by teachers and found in textbooks. This is the common language code of the higher classes and so advantages them when it comes to educational achievement as they are more familiar with these codes; minority ethnic groups – may be taught in a language that is not their home language e.g. in international schools, which may lead to problems of understanding and communication thus explaining lower educational achievement; bilingualism – research indicates that those students able to speak and use more than one recognised language may have an advantage in learning in schools and thus may do better; ethnocentrism in language – some languages may be thought of by teachers as ungrammatical and incorrect e.g. patois/creole – thus teachers did not recognise when children speaking or using these languages were in fact expressing complex and abstract ideas (Labov); immigration – students recently arrived in a country and with little understanding of the official language are likely to be disadvantaged in their opportunities to succeed at school due to an inability to access the curriculum; any other reasonable response. Arguments against: linguistic influences on educational achievement are thought to be significant but this does not mean that they have the most influence on a pupil’s educational achievement, a range of factors are likely to intersect with one another; cultural influences – social class – the working class have been linked with cultural deprivation that encourages immediate rather than deferred gratification, an absence of successful well educated role models and a culture of fatalism – this may explain their educational lack of success; cultural influences – ethnicity – different ethnicities value education differently and this is likely to influence a pupil’s educational achievement e.g. Archer’s research into why Chinese students do well in education; cultural influences – gender – socialisation into gender roles starts in the primary stage and this is likely to influence aspirations – so, for example, girls may feel that qualifications are not needed if their primary role is to be a mother; 2(e) material influences – social class – children living in poverty are less likely to succeed at school because of factors such as lack of supporting resources, having part-time jobs, lack of a quiet place to study, inadequate diet etc.; material influences – ethnicity – some ethnic minority groups have high numbers of their members also in the working class so they are likely to suffer from material deprivation more than the majority ethnic group which may explain their lack of educational success; material influences – gender – when a family has limited resources to spend on education, in some cultures a girl’s education may be seen as less important than that of boys; schools and teachers – teacher labelling and the setting/streaming process may be the biggest influence on how well a pupil succeeds in education; the peer group – peer pressure maybe the most important influence on educational achievement, especially for boys e.g. Willis ‘the lads’ (anti- school subcultures; any other reasonable response. Band 0 [0 marks] No creditworthy response. Band 1 [1–4 marks] Answers in this band may be vague and largely based on commonsense showing limited knowledge of the debate. Use of sociological terms or concepts is very unlikely. Responses may be short, undeveloped and one- sided. Lower in the band (1–2 marks), expect one or two weak points. Higher in the band (3–4 marks) candidates may offer more than two points and provide a weak definition of key terms in the question. Band 2 [5–8 marks] In this band candidates will show some basic knowledge of the debate. Alternatively, they may offer an answer which is list-like in nature but there will be no real attempt to assess the issues raised by the question. There may be limited/some use of sociological terms or concepts. Responses may be underdeveloped and lack range. Answers may be simplistic and two-sided or only cover one side of the debate. Lower in the band, the response may be rather narrow in the points covered and there may be some development. Higher in the band, more points are likely to be covered with some development. Alternatively, a list-like answer with some development covering both sides of the argument may score up to 8 marks. A one-sided answer cannot score higher than 8 marks. 2(e) Band 3 [9–12 marks] Answers in this band will show good sociological knowledge and understanding of the debate. Sociological terms and concepts will be used with greater accuracy and/or frequency. For the most part, answers will be well-developed, focused on the questions and there will be a range of points presented. There will be a two-sided response but it may lack range on one side. At the bottom of the band, candidates may provide a narrower range of developed points. At the top of the band, expect a wider range of developed points and clear focus on the question. Band 4 [13 – 15 marks] Answers in this band will show excellent knowledge and understanding of the debate. There will be a strong grasp of the arguments as well as accurate and frequent use of sociological terms and concepts. Answers will be well- developed, clearly focused on the question and discuss a wide range of points. Responses will be two-sided and have a range of points on each side. At the bottom of the band (13 marks), the answer may lack a specific conclusion. Higher in the band, there will be a clear attempt to offer an assessment of the ‘To what extent?’ part of the question through a focused conclusion.
3 All societies try to control and prevent crime but self-report studies and official crime statistics show that crime is still a problem in society. Sociologists debate the factors that explain why crime is committed, such as ethnicity. Law enforcement agencies aim to make people conform. However, deviancy amplification still occurs. (a) What is meant by the term ‘self-report studies’? [2] (b) Describe two ways law enforcement agencies make people conform. [4] (c) Explain how deviancy amplification can occur. [6] (d) Explain why sociologists criticise the accuracy of official crime statistics. [8] (e) To what extent is ethnicity a factor in explaining why some people commit crime? [15] Section D: Media
35 marks
Mark scheme: 3(a) What is meant by the term ‘self-report studies’? 2 One mark for partial definition e.g. asking about crime. Two marks for clear definition e.g. research that asks people what crimes or deviant acts they have committed. 3(b) Describe two ways law enforcement agencies make people conform. 4 Possible answers: police – allowed to carry weapons and use force if necessary, in order to achieve conformity; Marxism – repressive state apparatus – police are often used to control protests and demonstrations e.g. BLM/environmental protests and so achieve conformity; surveillance – monitoring behaviour in order to ensure conformity e.g. CCTV, trackers, cyber-technology etc.; police targeting – focusing on a particular group of people, believing them to be more criminal, in order to prevent crime and ensure people conform; police presence – this can cause fear in people thus making them conform; courts – sentence offenders based on their crime and send a clear message to others about what will happen if they break the law e.g. loss of liberty/a fine etc.; deterrence – seeing a police officer often puts people off from committing a crime or long sentences from the courts reported in the media similarly deter offending; zero tolerance – the police/the authorities/the courts can take action against even minor acts of deviance to send out the message that no criminal or deviant behaviour will be tolerated e.g. NYC/London riots – Wilson’s ‘broken windows’ ideas; any other reasonable response. One mark for each point correctly identified (up to maximum of two). One mark for each point that is developed (up to a maximum of two). 3(c) Explain how deviancy amplification can occur. 6 Possible answers: master status – being negatively labelled can give someone a master status that overrides all others, e.g. criminal – this therefore leads to more deviance as it is how the labelled person perceives themselves and thus acts; self-fulfilling prophecy – how people view themselves is largely derived from the view others have of them – this can cause individuals perceived as deviant to behave in this way; public labelling – being labelled as deviant can lead to rejection, loss of family and friends and so encourage further deviance with similarly negatively labelled individuals; deviant career – constant negative labelling may result in an individual’s self-identity changing, leading them to join an organised criminal group with shared norms and values that justify the deviant behaviour e.g. gangs – thus more deviancy occurs; stigma – some social groups or individuals become so badly thought of by others that they become stigmatised (seen by others as different in a negative way) – this may then lead to anger and resentment by the stigmatised group and so more deviance occurs; media stereotyping – the media stereotype certain social groups as deviant meaning society starts to think of and treat them warily – this may cause anger in the stereotyped groups that leads to deviance amplification; moral panics – these create folk devils who may then be discriminated against in society meaning that deviance amplification is the inevitable end result as legitimate means for success start to become more difficult; police targeting – the police believe some social groups to be more deviant than others and so target them – this can often lead to frustration and resistance in the targeted group which may lead to higher levels of deviance occurring e.g. Young’s ‘The Drug-Takers’; any other reasonable response. Band 0 [0 marks] No creditworthy response. Band 1 [1–3 marks] Answers in this band will show only a limited awareness of the question. Responses may be short and un/underdeveloped. At the bottom of the band (1 mark), expect one weak point. Higher in the band (2–3 marks), candidates may offer more than one weak point, but there may be a tendency towards simplistic answers, engaging with sociological ideas without using sociological language. Band 2 [4–6 marks] Answers in this band will have clear and accurate explanation, showing good sociological knowledge and understanding. Sociological terms and concepts should be expected and explained. At the bottom of the band, the range of points covered may be narrow or lack detail. Higher in the band, answers will cover more than one point in a well-developed way or cover several points in less detail. 3(d) Explain why sociologists criticise the accuracy of official crime 8 statistics. Possible answers: hidden crimes – not all crimes are recognised as crimes and thus will never enter the official crime statistics e.g. many white-collar crimes – this decreases the accuracy; reporting – a crime has to be reported to the police before it can reach the statistics, not all are e.g. a crime that involves family members/fear of repercussions etc which compromises the accuracy of the official crime statistics; sexual crimes – feminists report that these are notoriously under-reported and thus the official picture is highly inaccurate (as proven by victim studies e.g. Walklate); community distrust of the police – in some communities e.g. ethnic minorities, deprived estates, people do not trust the police and therefore are unlikely to report crimes to them meaning that crime statistics for these areas are unlikely to be accurate; corporate crimes – these rarely reach the official crime statistics as they are committed by large, wealthy and powerful institutions who bypass the law through manipulation and corruption – hence compromising the accuracy of the statistics; police recording of crimes – the police have the discretion to decide which crimes they record and who they arrest which means many reported crimes never make the official crime statistics = less accurate; pressure on police – forces are often under pressure to achieve good clear-up rates so may use processes such as ‘coughing and cuffing’ to manipulate the figures = a less accurate picture of crime; self-report studies – evidence from these shows that significant numbers of crimes are committed by women and members of the middle classes – this questions the accuracy of the official crime statistics; victim surveys – these can uncover those unreported crimes and therefore allows sociologists to question the accuracy of the official statistics e.g. the CSEW/BCS/localised victim surveys e.g. Islington/Merseyside show different patterns of criminality and victimisation to the OCS; any other reasonable response. Band 0 [0 marks] No creditworthy response. Band 1 [1–3 marks] Answers in this band will show only a limited awareness of the question. A tendency to description is likely. Responses may be short and undeveloped and points stated without explanation. Sociological terms and concepts are unlikely to be used. At the bottom of the band (1 mark), expect one weak point. Higher in the band (2–3 marks), candidates may offer more than one weak point. 3(d) Band 2 [4–6 marks] Answers in this band will show basic sociological knowledge and understanding. Responses may be underdeveloped and lacking in range. At the bottom of the band, candidates are unlikely to use sociological terms and concepts accurately. Higher in the band, candidates may be beginning to use sociological terms and concepts with greater accuracy. However, some aspects of the answer may only be partially developed/explained. Band 3 [7–8 marks] Answers in this band will show good sociological knowledge and understanding and will be well-developed and explained. Sociological terms and concepts will be used accurately overall. Answers will be well-focused on the question and there will be a range of points presented. At the top of the band explanations will be clear throughout. 3(e) To what extent is ethnicity a factor in explaining why some people 15 commit crime? Possible answers: Arguments for: official crime statistics show that some minority ethnic groups seem to commit disproportionately more crime than the ethnic majority, implying that ethnicity is a factor in explaining crime; prison statistics – ethnic minorities are incarcerated at a far greater rate than non-ethnic minorities which means they have been found guilty and convicted of crimes – this implies ethnicity is a factor to explain crime; police figures – police in London claim that rates of street crime are much higher for young, male Afro-Caribbeans than from other ethnic groups, this implies that ethnicity is a factor to explain crime; resistance to racism – research into ethnic deviant subcultures has revealed that much crime is committed as a response to living in a racist society e.g. urban riots, BLM protests and thus is a relevant factor; racial discrimination – ethnic minorities may become disillusioned with racial discrimination and prejudice in society that effectively blocks their chances of legitimate success and thus they turn to crime instead – ethnicity is therefore a factor to explain crime; marginalisation and relative deprivation – Lea and Young – where ethnic minority groups share the same values and aspirations as the rest of society but the normal routes to achieving these goals are blocked, e.g. success in education, alongside feelings of ‘not belonging’, their response may be crime = a relevant factor; victim surveys – many of these reveal high numbers of crimes committed by ethnic minorities, suggesting ethnicity is a factor that explains crime; any other reasonable response. Arguments against: young people – most crime is committed by young people and ethnic minorities tend to have a higher proportion of young people than the majority group so more crime would be expected from them – age not ethnicity being the crucial factor; policing practices – if the police target certain offences and/or areas and stop and search people from some ethnic groups more than others (as the evidence suggests) then it is to be expected that more crime in these ethnic groups would be uncovered – this does not show that ethnicity is a factor to explain crime; police racism – institutional racism in the police force may explain why so many ethnic minorities are arrested, searched and convicted of crimes rather than ethnicity in itself being the causal factor; masculinity – the pressure to be masculine (Messerschmidt) and/or to fulfil the breadwinner role means that gender may be a more relevant factor to explain crime than ethnicity; age – the search for thrills and excitement may explain the large proportion of young offenders, perhaps being a better explanation for crime than solely ethnicity; 3(e) social class – material deprivation and poverty may be the most likely explanations for crime, not ethnicity (more successful ethnic minority groups are not likely to be criminal) – Marxism; cultural deprivation – a lifestyle that does not value law and order or working hard may encourage criminal and deviant behaviour – this may better explain crime than ethnicity e.g. inadequate socialisation; intersectionality – it is likely that different factors combine to determine whether an individual commits crime, not just ethnicity – individuals are all likely to have different reasons, there is no one factor; victim surveys that report that ‘most’ offenders are ethnic minority may be biased, people may be more likely to report crimes committed by ethnic minorities because of racial prejudice therefore ethnicity is not a relevant factor; any other reasonable response. Band 0 [0 marks] No creditworthy response. Band 1 [1–4 marks] Answers in this band may be vague and largely based on commonsense showing limited knowledge of the debate. Use of sociological terms or concepts is very unlikely. Responses may be short, undeveloped and one- sided. Lower in the band (1–2 marks), expect one or two weak points. Higher in the band (3–4 marks) candidates may offer more than two points and provide a weak definition of key terms in the question. Band 2 [5–8 marks] In this band candidates will show some basic knowledge of the debate. Alternatively, they may offer an answer which is list-like in nature but there will be no real attempt to assess the issues raised by the question. There may be limited/some use of sociological terms or concepts. Responses may be underdeveloped and lack range. Answers may be simplistic and two-sided or only cover one side of the debate. Lower in the band, the response may be rather narrow in the points covered and there may be some development. Higher in the band, more points are likely to be covered with some development. Alternatively, a list-like answer with some development covering both sides of the argument may score up to 8 marks. A one-sided answer cannot score higher than 8 marks. Band 3 [9–12 marks] Answers in this band will show good sociological knowledge and understanding of the debate. Sociological terms and concepts will be used with greater accuracy and/or frequency. For the most part, answers will be well-developed, focused on the questions and there will be a range of points presented. There will be a two-sided response but it may lack range on one side. At the bottom of the band, candidates may provide a narrower range of developed points. At the top of the band, expect a wider range of developed points and clear focus on the question. 3(e) Band 4 [13–15 marks] Answers in this band will show excellent knowledge and understanding of the debate. There will be a strong grasp of the arguments as well as accurate and frequent use of sociological terms and concepts. Answers will be well- developed, clearly focused on the question and discuss a wide range of points. Responses will be two-sided and have a range of points on each side. At the bottom of the band (13 marks), the answer may lack a specific conclusion. Higher in the band, there will be a clear attempt to offer an assessment of the ‘To what extent?’ part of the question through a focused conclusion.
2 There are many different types of schools. For example, comprehensive schools and private schools. However, all schools educate, socialise and socially control students. Sociologists investigate different social groups’ experiences of education. This includes investigating factors such as cultural capital and the culture of masculinity. (a) What is meant by the term ‘cultural capital’? [2] (b) Describe two ways schools socially control students. [4] (c) Explain how private schools benefit students from higher social classes. [6] (d) Explain why the comprehensive system of education was introduced. [8] (e) To what extent does the culture of masculinity affect educational experience? [15] Section C: Crime, deviance and social control
35 marks
Mark scheme: 2(a) What is meant by the term ‘cultural capital’? 2 One mark for partial definition e.g. visiting museums and galleries. Two marks for clear definition e.g. the knowledge, language, attitudes and values that give those who have them an advantage in the educational system. 2(b) Describe two ways schools socially control students. 4 Possible answers: formal social control – schools use formal school rules to control pupils and ensure they obey those in authority, e.g. uniform rules, behaviour policy, homework policy etc.; informal social control – flexible measures of social control are frequently used within schools to control students e.g. a stern look or a smile in order to encourage conformity; negative sanctions – punishments are used in schools to control pupils and deter them from further bad behaviour e.g. detentions, negative contact with home; rewards (positive sanctions) – praise and other rewards such as positive contact home/treat trips are used to promote and encourage good behaviour by school pupils (social conformity); peer group – peer groups can use peer pressure and role models in order to control the behaviour and attitudes of others in the peer group who are keen to belong e.g. pro and anti-school subcultures; any other reasonable response. One mark for each point correctly identified (up to a maximum of two). One mark for each point that is developed (up to a maximum of two). 2(c) Explain how private schools benefit students from higher social classes. 6 Possible answers: Marxism – private schools typically gain better examination results and thus ensure the maintenance of elite culture as it is students from the higher social classes who typically attend private school; myth of meritocracy – the education system is not based on equality of opportunity and favours the higher classes who will achieve more in private education than those educated by the state – Marxism; smaller class sizes – private schools can therefore devote more specialist teacher attention to pupils and so achieve better examination results; better resources – private schools are paid for by parents and thus have more money to spend per child, resulting in better resources and facilities – all of which promotes better learning, outcomes and motivation for the students (who have come from the social classes); old boys network – the social capital gained in the private school system benefits those pupils who have attended such schools as they have contacts that can help them later with finding a job, gaining quality work experience etc.; parental pressure – if parents are paying for their child’s education, then they expect to get their money’s worth and so will pressure and be in close contact with the school in order to achieve this – as well as pressuring their child to do well – this ultimately benefits the children who are typically from the higher social classes; access to elite universities – private school students dominate the intake at elite universities which then leads to greater opportunities and success in employment e.g. government members are often dominated by those with an elite education; admissions policy – private schools often take only the best students academically so there is a culture of high attainment which typically leads to academic success and so benefits those who attend; any other reasonable response. Band 0 [0 marks] No creditworthy response. Band 1 [1–3 marks] Answers in this band will show only a limited awareness of the question. Responses may be short and un/underdeveloped. At the bottom of the band (1 mark), expect one weak point. Higher in the band (2–3 marks), candidates may offer more than one weak point, but there may be a tendency towards simplistic answers, engaging with sociological ideas without using sociological language. Band 2 [4–6 marks] Answers in this band will have clear and accurate explanation, showing good sociological knowledge and understanding. Sociological terms and concepts should be expected and explained. At the bottom of the band, the range of points covered may be narrow or lack detail. Higher in the band, answers will cover more than one point in a well-developed way or cover several points in less detail. 2(d) Explain why the comprehensive system of education was introduced. 8 Possible answers: meritocracy – comprehensive schools were introduced originally in the 1960’s to embrace the cultural change towards equality of opportunity for all through all pupils studying the same subjects in the same school (functionalism); replace the tripartite system – comprehensive schools replaced the three- tier system of education that was thought to be unfair and divisive for children; qualifications – comprehensive schools wanted to try to ensure that fewer pupils left school without any qualifications so they could better compete in society for jobs and success (tackling inequalities); working-class underachievement – comprehensive schools wanted to tackle the issue of working-class children’s under-achievement at school – they were the least likely to gain a place at a grammar school and so were often hindered in terms of being able to achieve academically hence comprehensives were introduced; tolerance and acceptance – comprehensive schools wanted to strengthen community bonds and bring together children from a diverse range of backgrounds in order to embrace multiculturalism, special needs and social class differences within a community; no label of failure – the comprehensive system did not have an entry test and therefore no students were labelled as ‘failures’ before their secondary education had even begun (Interactionism); social mobility – comprehensive schools believed that students should be judged on outcomes (universal standards such as examination results) not on social characteristics, and thus offered all pupils the chance to be socially mobile through educational success; any other reasonable response. Band 0 [0 marks] No creditworthy response. Band 1 [1–3 marks] Answers in this band will show only a limited awareness of the question. A tendency to description is likely. Responses may be short and undeveloped and points stated without explanation. Sociological terms and concepts are unlikely to be used. At the bottom of the band (1 mark), expect one weak point. Higher in the band (2–3 marks), candidates may offer more than one weak point. Band 2 [4–6 marks] Answers in this band will show basic sociological knowledge and understanding. Responses may be underdeveloped and lacking in range. At the bottom of the band, candidates are unlikely to use sociological terms and concepts accurately. Higher in the band, candidates may be beginning to use sociological terms and concepts with greater accuracy. However, some aspects of the answer may only be partially developed/explained. 2(d) Band 3 [7–8 marks] Answers in this band will show good sociological knowledge and understanding and will be well-developed and explained. Sociological terms and concepts will be used accurately overall. Answers will be well-focused on the question and there will be a range of points presented. At the top of the band explanations will be clear throughout. 2(e) To what extent does the culture of masculinity affect educational 15 experience? Possible answers: Arguments for: hegemonic masculinity (Connell) – there is a lot of pressure on boys to be perceived by their peers as masculine and this can lead to the formation of anti-school sub-cultures where such norms are accepted and admired e.g. providing status for the boys (Cohen’s status frustration); Willis ‘The Lads’ – his study showed the ‘lads’ came to school not to learn (perceived as feminine) but to have a laugh and mess about with their friends (‘do masculinity’) in an anti-school sub-culture; peer pressure – boys are afraid of negative labels e.g. sissy, and thus will act more masculine with their peers in school in order to conform to the stereotypical notion of ‘being male’ and so avoid any negative labelling; teacher labelling – teachers are likely to stereotype boys as being more troublesome (a perceived feature of masculinity) than girls in the classroom and this may lead to a self-fulfilling prophecy in which boys under-achieve and live up to their label; gendered subject choice – a culture of masculinity with the associated male and female traditional stereotypes may explain why girls and boys typically choose different options at school e.g. boys choose masculine subjects such as PE, Design and ICT; toxic masculinity – schools have been in the spotlight recently for not tackling so called ‘rape culture’ (Everyone’s Invited) which suggests that a culture of masculinity is still prevalent and influential in schools; male power – schools are seen by feminists as patriarchal institutions that benefit boys more than girls and thus the higher status given to masculinity is reflected in a culture where boys succeed and have higher status and visibility than girls e.g. boys dominate the playground, they dominate teacher time and attention in class etc.; role models – a school dominated by males in high positions (e.g. head- teacher), socialises students to believe that this is the norm and typical also of wider society – a culture of masculinity like this will therefore encourage boys to achieve more than girls so they too can achieve these positions of power; any other reasonable response. Arguments against: too deterministic – a culture of masculinity may be one factor to explain gendered educational experience but it is not the only one (intersectionality); negotiating masculinity – masculinity no longer has one singular meaning and is interpreted differently by different males therefore there is no longer just one culture of masculinity (e.g. we now have males who are meterosexual, new man, homosexual etc); does the culture of masculinity exist? – girls are now achieving more than boys in education almost universally so this has led some sociologists to question whether a culture of masculinity actually exists in education any longer; female role models – schools and wider society are full of positive role models for females and this culture is likely today to be far more influential on educational experience (for females) than a culture of masculinity; 2(e) feminisation of education – sociologists claim that education has been reconstructed to value feminine qualities such as conformity, listening, writing and reading – this contradicts the idea of a culture of masculinity being present in schools; functionalism and meritocracy – functionalists say schools are equal institutions that offer equal opportunities for all therefore the culture of masculinity cannot be relevant for explaining differences in educational experience, instead any differences are down to individual effort and ability; socialisation at home – girls and boys arrive at school already aware of their gender roles and expectations through processes such as canalisation and manipulation (Oakley) and this is therefore likely to impact upon experiences at school; feminism – this social movement has raised the aspirations and expectations of females and therefore it is unlikely that a culture of masculinity either still exists or is influential in education; material deprivation – this may be more influential on experiences than a culture of masculinity e.g. where families can only afford to educate sons not daughters; any other reasonable response. Band 0 [0 marks] No creditworthy response. Band 1 [1–4 marks] Answers in this band may be vague and largely based on commonsense showing limited knowledge of the debate. Use of sociological terms or concepts is very unlikely. Responses may be short, undeveloped and one- sided. Lower in the band (1–2 marks), expect one or two weak points. Higher in the band (3–4 marks) candidates may offer more than two points and provide a weak definition of key terms in the question. Band 2 [5–8 marks] In this band candidates will show some basic knowledge of the debate. Alternatively, they may offer an answer which is list-like in nature but there will be no real attempt to assess the issues raised by the question. There may be limited/some use of sociological terms or concepts. Responses may be underdeveloped and lack range. Answers may be simplistic and two-sided or only cover one side of the debate. Lower in the band, the response may be rather narrow in the points covered and there may be some development. Higher in the band, more points are likely to be covered with some development. Alternatively, a list-like answer with some development covering both sides of the argument may score up to 8 marks. A one-sided answer cannot score higher than 8 marks. 2(e) Band 3 [9–12 marks] Answers in this band will show good sociological knowledge and understanding of the debate. Sociological terms and concepts will be used with greater accuracy and/or frequency. For the most part, answers will be well-developed, focused on the questions and there will be a range of points presented. There will be a two-sided response but it may lack range on one side. At the bottom of the band, candidates may provide a narrower range of developed points. At the top of the band, expect a wider range of developed points and clear focus on the question. Band 4 [13–15 marks] Answers in this band will show excellent knowledge and understanding of the debate. There will be a strong grasp of the arguments as well as accurate and frequent use of sociological terms and concepts. Answers will be well- developed, clearly focused on the question and discuss a wide range of points. Responses will be two-sided and have a range of points on each side. At the bottom of the band (13 marks), the answer may lack a specific conclusion. Higher in the band, there will be a clear attempt to offer an assessment of the ‘To what extent?’ part of the question through a focused conclusion.
3 Victim surveys show that there is a dark figure of female crime. There are many different agencies of social control which can be formal or informal. Several different theories exist to explain why people commit crime, such as Marxism. Some sociologists argue that youth sub-cultures can be linked to crime. (a) What is meant by the term ‘victim surveys’? [2] (b) Describe two agencies of informal social control. [4] (c) Explain how youth sub-cultures can be linked to crime. [6] (d) Explain why Marxists argue some individuals commit crime. [8] (e) To what extent is there a dark figure of female crime? [15] Section D: Media
35 marks
Mark scheme: 3(a) What is meant by the term ‘victim surveys’? 2 One mark for partial definition e.g. asking about crime. Two marks for clear definition e.g. research that asks people what crimes they have been victims of. 3(b) Describe two agencies of informal social control. 4 Possible answers: family – primary socialisation teaches children society’s acceptable norms and values through processes such as imitation; media – the media offers role models and constant messages about how to behave and reminders of rewards and sanctions through various examples of good and bad; peer group/peers – powerful agent of control because people feel the need to belong to groups and thus the threat of isolation/rejection is powerful; education/school – the hidden curriculum is used to ensure students learn to obey the rules and conform to expectations; religion – holy books and religious teaching ensures people conform to religious beliefs and rules for life; workplace – rules and regulations exist alongside other norms that people need to learn in order to feel part of and be accepted into a workplace; any other reasonable response. One mark for each point correctly identified (up to a maximum of two). One mark for each point that is developed (up to a maximum of two). 3(c) Explain how youth sub-cultures can be linked to crime. 6 Possible answers: Merton’s strain theory – a possible reaction to status frustration is the development of new goals. If a group share these feelings then a new deviant youth sub-culture may emerge with criminal norms and values e.g. drug dealing; anti-school sub-cultures – studies of teenage boys in school labelled as ‘failures’ (e.g. Cohen/Willis) showed how this treatment would often lead to them resisting school authority and behaving in a criminal manner e.g. joining a gang, normalised violence; Cloward and Ohlin – criminal sub-culture – in some working class communities there are successful criminal role models and an informal career structure for aspiring young criminals hence some young males chose crime as their lifestyle; Cloward and Ohlin – conflict sub-culture – when both legal and criminal ways of achieving success were blocked, young males may turn to violence and gangs as a sign of resistance; Cloward and Ohlin – retreatist sub-culture – young people who feel that they cannot gain status or be successful may turn to drugs or alcohol as an escape, finding a group of similarly disaffected young people and so adopt criminal norms and values; postmodernism – thrills and excitement – young people are in search of the next ‘buzz’ and so may turn to criminal youth sub-cultures in order to achieve this e.g. joyriding, graffiti; Matza drift theory – Matza says that young people drift into criminal sub- cultures as they have few responsibilities in life and so can fulfil their ‘subterranean values’ through crime; youth sub-cultures – many of these groups have been linked with criminal behaviour e.g. mods and the rockers = assaults and violence, skinheads = racism, punks = anti-social behaviour, ravers/hippies = drug use etc.; any other reasonable response. Band 0 [0 marks] No creditworthy response. Band 1 [1–3 marks] Answers in this band will show only a limited awareness of the question. Responses may be short and un/underdeveloped. At the bottom of the band (1 mark), expect one weak point. Higher in the band (2–3 marks), candidates may offer more than one weak point, but there may be a tendency towards simplistic answers, engaging with sociological ideas without using sociological language. Band 2 [4–6 marks] Answers in this band will have clear and accurate explanations, showing good sociological knowledge and understanding. Sociological terms and concepts should be expected and explained. At the bottom of the band, the range of points covered may be narrow or lack detail. Higher in the band, answers will cover more than one point in a well-developed way or cover several points in less detail. 3(d) Explain why Marxists argue some individuals commit crime. 8 Possible answers: material deprivation – being short of money and feeling disadvantaged is thought by Marxists to explain much instrumental crime e.g. robbery, burglary; marginalisation – lower class people do not have organisations or representatives to protect their interests, so they have no outlet for their feelings of anger other than through violence and rioting; alienation – capitalism’s focus on economic assets and material success dehumanises people and means they will turn to crime in order to get what they want; consumer society – we are defined by what we consume, status symbols are everything and thus if people cannot legitimately afford such items they will turn to crime to get them instead; lack of equality in society – if society is seen as unjust and unfair then the lower classes and the most deprived in society will turn to crime out of frustration and anger e.g. BLM rioting/urban riots etc.; resistance to capitalism – the CCCS claimed that crime was the result of young people refusing to accept capitalist ideologies e.g. drug taking and the Punks, violence and the Skinheads etc.; capitalism is criminogenic – capitalism encourages criminal behaviour because of its focus on competition, no matter the consequences for other people – any way to succeed becomes acceptable in such a system therefore crime occurs; selective law enforcement – the law treats different social classes differently meaning that the lower classes are criminalised by the agents of social control e.g. the police, and thus are more likely to be caught committing crimes; law creation – the law is made by the elite in order to serve their interests and benefit them – this means that lower social classes seem to commit more crime because more focus is on street crimes than, say, corporate, state or white-collar crimes; any other reasonable response. Band 0 [0 marks] No creditworthy response. Band 1 [1–3 marks] Answers in this band will show only a limited awareness of the question. A tendency to description is likely. Responses may be short and undeveloped and points stated without explanation. Sociological terms and concepts are unlikely to be used. At the bottom of the band (1 mark), expect one weak point. Higher in the band (2–3 marks), candidates may offer more than one weak point. Band 2 [4–6 marks] Answers in this band will show basic sociological knowledge and understanding. Responses may be underdeveloped and lacking in range. At the bottom of the band, candidates are unlikely to use sociological terms and concepts accurately. Higher in the band, candidates may be beginning to use sociological terms and concepts with greater accuracy. However, some aspects of the answer may only be partially developed/explained. 3(d) Band 3 [7–8 marks] Answers in this band will show good sociological knowledge and understanding and will be well-developed and explained. Sociological terms and concepts will be used accurately overall. Answers will be well-focused on the question and there will be a range of points presented. At the top of the band explanations will be clear throughout. 3(e) To what extent is there a dark figure of female crime? 15 Possible answers: Arguments for: Pollak – his work suggested that females were more manipulative and devious than males and so were better able to hide their criminality hence the low figures in the OCS; Pollak – chivalry – this thesis suggests that females get away with crime because men find it impossible to equate a hardened criminal with the stereotype of a gentle, caring female – thus there is a dark figure of female crime because they receive more lenient treatment from law enforcement agencies than a male would; self-report studies – e.g. Campbell – these show that rates of female offending are far higher than official figures suggest, meaning female crime is hidden in the dark figure; white-collar crime – this type of crime is notoriously under-reported and as women dominate office work it is likely that they are getting away with much white-collar crime i.e. a dark figure of female crime; police labelling – as females do not fit Cicourel’s picture of the ‘typical delinquent’ they are unlikely to be targeted by the police and thus are more likely to get away with committing crime = a dark figure (Interactionism); victimless crime – females are said to play a major role in the sex industry (as prostitutes and escorts) and the drugs industry (as mules); because there are no traditional victims of these crimes i.e. people are paying for the service, they are unlikely to be reported and thus female crime remains hidden in the ‘dark figure’; domestic abuse – crimes against women in the home form a huge dark figure and thus are hidden as they are notoriously under-reported and under-recorded by the police (Dobash and Dobash); media representations – the media still portray traditional stereotypes of males and females and therefore women are unlikely to be represented as a criminal, more so as a victim. This agenda setting affects public perception of who the criminals are resulting in a dark figure of female crime as females are just not suspected to be or thought of as criminal; domestic setting – women are still located primarily in the private sphere and so, whether criminals or victims, their actions and experiences are more hidden than those in the public sphere (which is still dominated by males); any other reasonable response. 3(e) Arguments against: male criminals – functionalists would believe the picture of crime in the OCS that clearly shows that males commit the vast majority of crimes in society i.e. female crime is not a dark figure; female dominated crimes – crimes such as prostitution and shoplifting are shown to be dominated by females according to the OCS, these female crimes are therefore not a dark figure; increasing female criminality – feminism – there has been a reported increase in crimes committed by females and researchers talk about the ‘girl gang’ phenomenon – these feature highly in media reports thus female crime is no longer a dark figure; double deviance – some feminists suggest that when females do commit criminal acts they are demonised in the media as ‘monsters’ and treated more severely than a male would be by the criminal justice system – their crimes are not a dark figure; gendered socialisation – Oakley – female crime is not hidden, females just commit less of it as they are still socialised to be nurturing and caring rather than aggressive and competitive; differential social control – Heidensohn – females are under greater levels of social control than males and therefore it is not surprising that they commit less crime; their crimes are not hidden, they just commit less of them; hidden figure of crime – sociologists would say there is a huge dark figure of crime for both males and females, female crime is no more hidden than male e.g. white-collar/corporate crime; any other reasonable response. Band 0 [0 marks] No creditworthy response. Band 1 [1–4 marks] Answers in this band may be vague and largely based on commonsense showing limited knowledge of the debate. Use of sociological terms or concepts is very unlikely. Responses may be short, undeveloped and one- sided. Lower in the band (1–2 marks), expect one or two weak points. Higher in the band (3–4 marks) candidates may offer more than two points and provide a weak definition of key terms in the question. Band 2 [5–8 marks] In this band candidates will show some basic knowledge of the debate. Alternatively, they may offer an answer which is list-like in nature but there will be no real attempt to assess the issues raised by the question. There may be limited/some use of sociological terms or concepts. Responses may be underdeveloped and lack range. Answers may be simplistic and two-sided or only cover one side of the debate. Lower in the band, the response may be rather narrow in the points covered and there may be some development. Higher in the band, more points are likely to be covered with some development. Alternatively, a list-like answer with some development covering both sides of the argument may score up to 8 marks. 3(e) A one-sided answer cannot score higher than 8 marks. Band 3 [9–12 marks] Answers in this band will show good sociological knowledge and understanding of the debate. Sociological terms and concepts will be used with greater accuracy and/or frequency. For the most part, answers will be well-developed, focused on the questions and there will be a range of points presented. There will be a two-sided response but it may lack range on one side. At the bottom of the band, candidates may provide a narrower range of developed points. At the top of the band, expect a wider range of developed points and clear focus on the question. Band 4 [13–15 marks] Answers in this band will show excellent knowledge and understanding of the debate. There will be a strong grasp of the arguments as well as accurate and frequent use of sociological terms and concepts. Answers will be well- developed, clearly focused on the question and discuss a wide range of points. Responses will be two-sided and have a range of points on each side. At the bottom of the band (13 marks), the answer may lack a specific conclusion. Higher in the band, there will be a clear attempt to offer an assessment of the ‘To what extent?’ part of the question through a focused conclusion.
3 Crime and deviance are relative. Functionalists and Marxists disagree in their views on crime. Crime statistics can be affected by a range of factors, including police targeting. In some societies exile occurs. (a) What is meant by the term ‘exile’? [2] (b) Describe two ways crime and deviance are relative. [4] (c) Explain how functionalists view crime. [6] (d) Explain why some young people commit crime. [8] (e) To what extent are crime statistics most affected by police targeting? [15] Section D: Media
35 marks
Mark scheme: 3(a) What is meant by the term ‘exile’? 2 One mark for a partial definition e.g. banished. Two marks for a clear definition e.g. punishment involving the offender having to leave their home and community. 3(b) Describe two ways crime and deviance are relative. 4 Possible answers: • time/era – definitions of crime and deviance change over time e.g. laws on smoking in public places/attitudes to homosexuality; • culture – the norms and values of the culture determine whether something is considered deviant or not e.g. child marriages; • religion – religious beliefs may determine whether an act is seen as criminal/deviant e.g. Catholics see divorce as a sin, atheists do not; • society/country – laws are different in different societies e.g. alcohol cannot be consumed until age 21 in America, 18 in the UK and 15 in Mali; • situation – e.g. knocking someone unconscious in the street would be seen as deviant, doing the same in the boxing ring would be praised; • role-based – the role a person plays may determine whether an act is criminal or not e.g. a police officer using physical force is acceptable, attacking a stranger on the street is a criminal offence; • any other reasonable response. One mark for each point correctly identified (up to maximum of two). One mark for each point that is developed (up to a maximum of two). 3(c) Explain how functionalists view crime. 6 Possible answers: • Durkheim – crime in society is inevitable and beneficial in terms of reinforcing the dominant norms and values, too much crime, however, is dysfunctional; • shared values – society agrees on what is wrong and right, as clarified by the law – punishing people who deviate reminds people of what is acceptable and where the moral boundaries lie; • degradation ceremonies – punishing criminals acts as a deterrent to others and thus reduces levels of criminality e.g. public hangings, media trials etc.; • Merton’s strain theory – people are encouraged to achieve the American Dream in order to be successful but not everyone can achieve it legally therefore some people turn to crime; • Cohen’s status frustration – young, working-class males face social inequalities, do poorly at school and so may turn to crime as they cannot achieve their status through legitimate means; • socialisation and social control – functionalists see these as key to preventing crime, thus individuals who are poorly socialised or not properly socially controlled are likely to turn to crime; • Murray and the New Right – crime is rife in the underclass due to the decline of the nuclear family, decline in marriage, rise in single parent families and the lack of a father figure; • Any other reasonable response. Band 0 [0 marks] No creditworthy response. Band 1 [1–3 marks] Answers in this band will show only a limited awareness of the question. Responses may be short and un/underdeveloped. At the bottom of the band (1 mark), expect one weak point. Higher in the band (2–3 marks), candidates may offer more than one weak point, but there may be a tendency towards simplistic answers, engaging with sociological ideas without using sociological language. Band 2 [4–6 marks] Answers in this band will have clear and accurate explanation, showing good sociological knowledge and understanding. Sociological terms and concepts should be expected and explained. At the bottom of the band, the range of points covered may be narrow or lack detail. Higher in the band, answers will cover more than one point in a well-developed way or cover several points in less detail. 3(d) Explain why some young people commit crime. 8 Possible answers: • status offences – crimes may have been committed that would not be categorised as such were the person older i.e. a part of normal life e.g. consumption of alcohol, sexual activity; • functionalism – normal period of adolescence in transition – youth crime is typically non-violent and not repeated and is just a normal part of growing up as young people find their place in society and their identity; • criminal role models – family members, friends or the community may influence young people to become criminal, crime is normalised and young people are more susceptible to influence; • peer pressure – young people feel pressure to be accepted by their peer group and may engage in criminal activity to do so e.g. gangs; • parenting styles – socialisation and social control – over strict or over lenient parenting is often associated with juvenile delinquency; • Cohen’s status frustration – those young people who struggle to acquire status legally in society may turn to crime in order to achieve it instead e.g. working class boys; • Marxism – poverty – young people living in poverty are more likely to commit crime as a ‘quick fix’ in order to deal with factors such as relative deprivation; • resistance to racism – some ethnic minority young people may engage in criminal behaviour to resist the racism they perceive in society e.g. BLM rioting; • culture of masculinity – young males may turn to criminal behaviour to prove their masculinity; • consumer culture – there is much pressure on young people to have the latest fashions and status symbols therefore many turn to crime in order to fund this lifestyle; • postmodernism – thrills and excitement – crime is seen to be fun therefore young people engage in it in order to have a good time e.g. edgework (Katz, Lyng); • Matza’s drift theory – young people drift into crime and deviance as a normal part of growing up and testing the boundaries, giving up crime as they get older and take on more responsibilities; • any other reasonable response. Band 0 [0 marks] No creditworthy response. Band 1 [1–3 marks] Answers in this band will show only a limited awareness of the question. A tendency to description is likely. Responses may be short and undeveloped and points stated without explanation. Sociological terms and concepts are unlikely to be used. At the bottom of the band (1 mark), expect one weak point. Higher in the band (2–3 marks), candidates may offer more than one weak point. 3(d) Band 2 [4–6 marks] Answers in this band will show basic sociological knowledge and understanding. Responses maybe underdeveloped and lacking in range. At the bottom of the band, candidates are unlikely to use sociological terms and concepts accurately. Higher in the band, candidates may be beginning to use sociological terms and concepts with greater accuracy. However, some aspects of the answer may only be partially developed/explained. Band 3 [7–8 marks] Answers in this band will show good sociological knowledge and understanding and will be well-developed and explained. Sociological terms and concepts will be used accurately overall. Answers will be well-focused on the question and there will be a range of points presented. At the top of the band explanations will be clear throughout. 3(e) To what extent are crime statistics most affected by police targeting? 15 Possible answers: FOR: • males – males are more likely to be perceived as criminals than females therefore are targeted more by the police. This may affect the crime statistics as then more males will be arrested/charged than females; • chivalry factor – Pollak – the police are male dominated and may find it hard to believe that females can be criminal thus do not target them – this can lead to an under-representation of female criminals in crime statistics; • working class – the police typically target certain areas, usually dominated by the working class e.g. inner city/deprived areas, in the belief that there will be more crime there – the working class are thus more likely to be arrested/charged, so distorting the crime statistics; • white-collar crime – middle/upper class criminals are rarely targeted by the police and thus Marxists believe there is a huge dark figure of white- collar crime being committed that is not shown in the crime statistics; • ethnicity – evidence shows that some ethnic minorities are far more likely to be stopped and searched by the police than other ethnic groups – this will lead to higher arrest rates and charges for these groups and so will distort the crime statistics (institutional racism); • Islamophobia – since 9/11 research shows that Muslims have been targeted by the police due to fears of terrorism and radicalisation, this targeting will then affect the crime statistics; • age – young people are often targeted by the police as they fit the criminal stereotype, meaning that much adult crime goes unnoticed and so distorts the crime statistics; • labelling theory – Becker believes that through police targeting those under suspicion will live up to their criminal label and commit more crime than they would have done otherwise – self-fulfilling prophecy thus police targeting directly affects crime statistics; • Cicourel – his work shows there is a ‘typical delinquent’ stereotype that is used by the formal agents to target certain people – this means others are being ignored and therefore this affects the crime statistics; • resistance – many groups targeted by the police get angry and resist arrest/being searched thus their deviance amplifies and they appear more deviant then would have been the case without the police targeting – a distorted picture of crime appears in crime statistics; • any other reasonable response. AGAINST: • functionalism – the official picture of crime is accurate – the police target those who commit most crime in society so police targeting does not affect crime statistics; • non-reporting of crime – there is a large hidden figure of crime (e.g. fear of reprisal/humiliation etc) which cannot be represented in the crime statistics, making the patterns and trends inaccurate. This therefore affects the crime statistics more than police targeting; • ethnicity – the police target ethnic minorities because they do commit the most crime as proven by the official crime statistics (due to factors such as poverty, racism etc); 3(e) • age – young people do commit the most crime in society therefore it is accurate and fair that the police should target them (thrills, peer pressure etc.); • gender – males are rightly targeted by the police as they commit the most crime due to the culture of masculinity and gendered socialisation; • social class – most crime, particularly that which the public is afraid of, is committed by the working class, often therefore the police are right to target them; • moral panics – it is not the police targeting that affects crime statistics but instead media representations of crime, particularly through moral panics and the creation of folk devils e.g. mods and rockers, the drug-takers etc.; • police as repressive state apparatus – Marxists believe that the police are simply a tool of the ruling elite and therefore their targeting of certain social groups is at the government’s bequest in order to maintain the ‘status quo’ – government not police targeting; • new technologies – it may not be police targeting that affects the crime statistics but whether the crime committed can be traced and investigated effectively; • social construction of crime statistics – whether crime is reported and/or recorded has the biggest effect on crime statistics, not police targeting; • feminism – women as victims – feminists would say that males need to be targeted more by the police as they are currently getting away with crimes committed against women – the crime statistics on this are hugely distorted due to the dark figure, not due to police targeting; • any other reasonable response. Band 0 [0 marks] No creditworthy response. Band 1 [1–4 marks] Answers in this band may be vague and largely based on common sense showing limited knowledge of the debate. Use of sociological terms or concepts is very unlikely. Responses may be short, undeveloped and one- sided. Lower in the band (1–2 marks), expect one or two weak points. Higher in the band (3–4 marks) candidates may offer more than two points and provide a weak definition of key terms in the question. Band 2 [5–8 marks] In this band candidates will show some basic knowledge of the debate. Alternatively, they may offer an answer which is list-like in nature but there will be no real attempt to assess the issues raised by the question. There may be limited/some use of sociological terms or concepts. Responses may be underdeveloped and lack range. Answers may be simplistic and two-sided or only cover one side of the debate. Lower in the band, the response may be rather narrow in the points covered and there may be some development. Higher in the band, more points are likely to be covered with some development. Alternatively, a list-like answer with some development covering both sides of the argument may score up to 8 marks. A one-sided answer cannot score higher than 8 marks. 3(e) Band 3 [9–12 marks] Answers in this band will show good sociological knowledge and understanding of the debate. Sociological terms and concepts will be used with greater accuracy and/or frequency. For the most part, answers will be well-developed, focused on the questions and there will be a range of points presented. There will be a two-sided response but it may lack range on one side. At the bottom of the band, candidates may provide a narrower range of developed points. At the top of the band, expect a wider range of developed points and clear focus on the question. Band 4 [13–15 marks] Answers in this band will show excellent knowledge and understanding of the debate. There will be a strong grasp of the arguments as well as accurate and frequent use of sociological terms and concepts. Answers will be well- developed, clearly focused on the question and discuss a wide range of points. Responses will be two-sided and have a range of points on each side. At the bottom of the band (13 marks), the answer may lack a specific conclusion. Higher in the band, there will be a clear attempt to offer an assessment of the ‘To what extent.?’ part of the question through a focused conclusion.
3 Official crime statistics show how much crime has been committed in society. There are different explanations for why some social groups commit more crime than others. Masculinity is one sociological explanation. Informal and formal agencies of social control prevent deviant behaviour and can make individuals conform. Some sociologists argue that more rehabilitation is needed. (a) What is meant by the term ‘rehabilitation’? [2] (b) Describe two limitations of official crime statistics. [4] (c) Explain how informal agencies of social control can make individuals conform. [6] (d) Explain why community sentencing is an effective way of dealing with crime. [8] (e) To what extent is masculinity the best explanation for crime? [15] Section D: Media
35 marks
Mark scheme: 3(a) What is meant by the term ‘rehabilitation’? 2 One mark for partial definition e.g. counselling services/addiction programmes/re–socialisation. Two marks for clear definition e.g. work or education to help offenders realise they were wrong to commit a crime/when offenders are encouraged to change their norms and values in order to conform to society’s expectations. 3(b) Describe two limitations of official crime statistics. 4 Possible answers: • dark figure of crime – sociological research demonstrates that there is a large figure of crime that is not officially known about and so does not feature in the OCS making this measure incomplete; • unreported crime – crimes not reported to the police will not feature in the OCS (e.g. a private affair, too embarrassed, afraid of repercussions etc.) making them inaccurate; • unrecorded crime – the police do not record all crimes reported to them and so these crimes do not appear in the OCS e.g. crime categorised as a family matter making them inaccurate; • victimless crimes – crimes without an obvious victim will not feature in the OCS e.g. drug taking, status crimes making them inaccurate; • white-collar crime – non-official measures of crime show that this type of crime is frequently not reported or recorded and so rarely appears in the OCS (Marxism) making them incomplete; • police discretion – police forces and officers often focus on different crimes to one another meaning that reliability may be low, e.g. one force cracks down on drug dealing and targets and prosecutes offenders whilst another targets and prosecutes shoplifting – there is thus little comparability; • institutional racism – stop and searches done by the police disproportionately feature ethnic minorities so the OCS are biased and ethnic minorities are thus over-represented in the OCS; • quantitative data – statistics are only numbers and therefore do not show reasons for crimes being committed or the impact upon victims they lack validity; • any other reasonable response. One mark for each point correctly identified (up to a maximum of two). One mark for each point that is developed (up to a maximum of two). 3(c) Explain how informal agencies of social control can make individuals 6 conform. Possible answers: • personalisation – there is often a personal relationship between the individual and the informal agent that makes it more difficult to be deviant, e.g. family; • sanctions – negative comments, ridicule, disapproving looks etc. can all be used by informal agencies in order to discourage deviance; • rewards – praise, treats, presents etc. can all be used by the informal agencies in order to encourage conformity; • internalisation – the informal agencies aim to get individuals to internalise society’s accepted norms and values so that they self-regulate their thoughts and actions and thus become conformist, even when alone; • family use techniques such as canalisation and manipulation (Oakley feminism) to encourage gendered socialisation, norms and behaviour; • peers use techniques such as peer pressure in order to persuade individuals to conform to the peer group’s norms and values, e.g. gangs; • media use techniques such as imitation and role modelling to persuade individuals to act and think in a particular way, e.g. beauty standards and ideals; • education uses the hidden curriculum and hierarchies to encourage conformity, e.g. the gendered curriculum/hierarchy; • workplace uses fear of losing your job, social exclusion and alienation (Marxism) to keep the workforce passive and conformist to the ruling class elite; • religion uses narratives, rewards and sanctions to encourage conformity and to discourage deviance e.g. the belief in heaven and hell, religious teachings etc.; • any other reasonable response. Band 0 [0 marks] No creditworthy response. Band 1 [1–3 marks] Answers in this band will show only a limited awareness of the question. Responses may be short and un/underdeveloped. At the bottom of the band (1 mark), expect one weak point. Higher in the band (2–3 marks), candidates may offer more than one weak point, but there may be a tendency towards simplistic answers, engaging with sociological ideas without using sociological language. Band 2 [4–6 marks] Answers in this band will have clear and accurate explanation, showing good sociological knowledge and understanding. Sociological terms and concepts should be expected and explained. At the bottom of the band, the range of points covered may be narrow or lack detail. Higher in the band, answers will cover more than one point in a well–developed way or cover several points in less detail. 3(d) Explain why community sentencing is an effective way of dealing with 8 crime. Possible answers: • loss of personal freedom – taking away a person’s ability to control their own actions is seen as a punishment and thus the fear of losing this freedom means that most people conform to the rules or do not deviate enough to get community sentencing – deterrence; • tagging – monitoring an individual’s movements through electronic surveillance ensures that the offender cannot commit further crimes and therefore keeps the public safe; • curfews – imposing restrictions on an individual’s movements is a good way of preventing them from entering certain areas or going out at particular times, this can often prevent crimes happening; • community service – it makes offenders give something directly back to the community that they have committed crimes against and is therefore an effective way of trying to make amends; • skills building – community sentencing can often be a way for offenders to build their skill set and so improve self-confidence and self-motivation, e.g. through teamwork, communication skills, punctuality etc. – this will reduce future likelihood of offending; • sanctions – if the specific regulations and requirements of the community sentence are not followed then the offender will face further, more serious sanctions to ensure conformity – most offenders will therefore conform in order to avoid these; • job opportunities – much community sentencing involves offenders completing unpaid work; this may be painting, joinery, caring etc. and can often increase the networks needed to open up future employment possibilities – having a job is likely to reduce the chances of further re- offending; • humiliation/shame – it can often be a public punishment, e.g. offenders in public wearing a ‘uniform’ deters others/the offender from committing further crime and humiliates the offender; • rehabilitation – community sentencing makes offenders realise there are consequences for their actions, thus making it an effective way to deal with crime and prevent further re-offending; • fair system of punishment – the punishment fits the crime, i.e. if you vandalise a park you will be made to clean that park, this means offenders and others in the community can see a clear link between offending and punishment which is likely to prevent further crime; • any other reasonable response. Band 0 [0 marks] No creditworthy response. Band 1 [1–3 marks] Answers in this band will show only a limited awareness of the question. A tendency to description is likely. Responses may be short and undeveloped and points stated without explanation. Sociological terms and concepts are unlikely to be used. At the bottom of the band (1 mark), expect one weak point. Higher in the band (2–3 marks), candidates may offer more than one weak point. 3(d) Band 2 [4–6 marks] Answers in this band will show basic sociological knowledge and understanding. Responses maybe underdeveloped and lacking in range. At the bottom of the band, candidates are unlikely to use sociological terms and concepts accurately. Higher in the band, candidates may be beginning to use sociological terms and concepts with greater accuracy. However, some aspects of the answer may only be partially developed/explained. Band 3 [7–8 marks] Answers in this band will show good sociological knowledge and understanding and will be well–developed and explained. Sociological terms and concepts will be used accurately overall. Answers will be well focused on the question and there will be a range of points presented. At the top of the band explanations will be clear throughout. 3(e) To what extent is masculinity the best explanation for crime? 15 Possible answers: FOR: • asserting masculinity – men show they are men in different ways such as working hard and providing for their family but some may turn to crime to compensate for their inability to support a family as breadwinner (Mac an Ghaill, crisis in masculinity); • postmodernism – Katz, Lyng, edgework – adventurous and risk-taking behaviour, e.g. joy-riding, stealing, football hooliganism are ways a man’s masculinity may lead to crime; • aggression – assault, domestic violence etc. are ways some men show their masculinity and are all criminal/deviant; • doing masculinity – Messerschmidt – some males turn to crime if they are unable to demonstrate their masculinity through other, legitimate means; • white-collar crime – within their employment men are more likely to commit such crimes due to masculinity as the crime may be motivated by money or needing to fulfil the provider role for their family; • status frustration – Cohen – having a status as masculine is important to young males and if this status cannot be achieved legitimately, e.g. at school or work, then males may try to achieve it through crime instead; • gang crime – to be successful in a gang and climb the hierarchy gang members often need to prove their masculinity through initiation ceremonies and rites of passage – these are often criminal, e.g. assault; • Miller’s focal concerns – working class men – behaving in an overtly masculine way is seen as a norm for working class males and this culture often leads them into crime; • Hyper-masculinity – Sewell – a subculture of black masculinity provides peer support which makes up for the boys’ sense of rejection by their perhaps absent fathers, and for the sense of racism and injustice they feel from wider society which often results in criminal behaviour, e.g. resistance to authority/racism; • toxic masculinity – through media representations, the male gaze (Mulvey) – using maleness in a criminal way to assert authority and maintain power is seen to be legitimised; • masculine gender role strain theory – the strain for males to be masculine (avoiding emotions and vulnerability) can explain acts of criminal violence committed by males – this is often seen as the only way they can show hegemonic masculinity; • sexual crime – feminists claim that men use sexual crimes to reinforce and maintain their power in both private and public spheres and that their masculinity is central to this law-breaking behaviour – patriarchal terrorism; • any other reasonable response. AGAINST: • diversity – what it means to be masculine today has diversified and therefore masculinity per se cannot explain crime as it is not a universal concept, e.g. Connell marginalised/complicit masculinities; 3(e) • female crime – self report studies indicate that relatively large numbers of females commit crimes, despite often not appearing in the official crime statistics – this cannot be explained by masculinity; • Marxism – relative deprivation may be a more reasonable explanation for instrumental crime than masculinity; • racism – discrimination and racial injustice may be a more useful explanation for crime than masculinity and would perhaps help to explain the high conviction rates of young, black males; • postmodernism – crime is seen to be exciting and fun therefore when it is committed this is not about proving one’s masculinity but instead about enjoyment; • Matza drift theory – Matza explains why so many young people commit crimes (most of which do not appear in the official crime statistics) believing it is about experimentation and the transition into adulthood not masculinity; • labelling theory – Becker – crime may be better explained by labelling than masculinity, e.g. high stop and search rates for ethnic minorities, police stereotypes, police targeting etc.; • functionalism – crime is not caused by masculinity but by the need in society to deter others from crime through degradation ceremonies acting as a warning function to others; • inadequate socialisation – Murray, New Right – not being adequately socialised into society’s norms and values better explains crime than masculinity does, e.g. single parent families/the underclass; • changing male roles – males are no longer expected to be breadwinners and providers – many men are househusbands or have female partners who are the main breadwinner therefore committing crime to fulfil the masculine role no longer makes sense; • intersectionality – one factor alone, e.g. masculinity, can rarely explain why a crime has been committed – typically there are more complex factors at play than this; • any other reasonable response. Band 0 [0 marks] No creditworthy response. Band 1 [1–4 marks] Answers in this band may be vague and largely based on common sense showing limited knowledge of the debate. Use of sociological terms or concepts is very unlikely. Responses may be short, undeveloped and one– sided. Lower in the band (1–2 marks), expect one or two weak points. Higher in the band (3–4 marks) candidates may offer more than two points and provide a weak definition of key terms in the question. 3(e) Band 2 [5–8 marks] In this band candidates will show some basic knowledge of the debate. Alternatively, they may offer an answer which is list–like in nature but there will be no real attempt to assess the issues raised by the question. There may be limited/some use of sociological terms or concepts. Responses may be underdeveloped and lack range. Answers may be simplistic and two–sided or only cover one side of the debate. Lower in the band, the response may be rather narrow in the points covered and there may be some development. Higher in the band, more points are likely to be covered with some development. Alternatively, a list–like answer with some development covering both sides of the argument may score up to 8 marks. A one–sided answer cannot score higher than 8 marks. Band 3 [9–12 marks] Answers in this band will show good sociological knowledge and understanding of the debate. Sociological terms and concepts will be used with greater accuracy and/or frequency. For the most part, answers will be well–developed, focused on the questions and there will be a range of points presented. There will be a two–sided response but it may lack range on one side. At the bottom of the band, candidates may provide a narrower range of developed points. At the top of the band, expect a wider range of developed points and clear focus on the question. Band 4 [13–15 marks] Answers in this band will show excellent knowledge and understanding of the debate. There will be a strong grasp of the arguments as well as accurate and frequent use of sociological terms and concepts. Answers will be well– developed, clearly focused on the question and discuss a wide range of points. Responses will be two–sided and have a range of points on each side. At the bottom of the band (13 marks), the answer may lack a specific conclusion. Higher in the band, there will be a clear attempt to offer an assessment of the ‘To what extent.?’ part of the question through a focused conclusion.
4 Some sociologists believe the media has been changed by the creation of the internet. Other sociologists argue sensationalism in the media still exists. All forms of media contain bias and stereotypes. For example, young people are often stereotyped in the media. (a) What is meant by the term ‘sensationalism’? [2] (b) Describe two media stereotypes of young people. [4] (c) Explain how the media is controlled. [6] (d) Explain why bias in the news may benefit powerful groups. [8] (e) To what extent has the media been changed by the creation of the internet? [15]
35 marks
Mark scheme: 4(a) What is meant by the term ‘sensationalism’? 2 One mark for partial definition e.g. exaggerating facts. Two marks for clear definition e.g. where stories are deliberately reported in ways designed to excite or attract viewers or readers. 4(b) Describe two media stereotypes of young people. 4 Possible answers: • children as innocent and vulnerable, in need of adult guidance and protection; • children as fun loving and free, surrounded by toys e.g. in advertising, with a lack of responsibilities and an exciting life of possibilities ahead of them; • children as victims – charity adverts will often choose this stereotype of children, showing them as unhappy victims, as child soldiers, as child labourers or as victims of famine; • teenagers as irresponsible and reckless, e.g. risk-taking behaviour, anti- social behaviour, e.g. Fawbert’s ‘the hoodies’; • teenage boys as gang members – violent, weapon carrying, inhabiting a dangerous underworld often associated with the drugs trade/crime e.g. Hollywood movies; • teenagers as members of rebellious youth sub-cultures, e.g. Cohen’s mods and rockers; • teenagers as the folk devils in media moral panics – out of control, a worry for the older generation, in need of stronger social control; • cult of beauty – young females have become associated with attractiveness and beauty standards in the media therefore are often represented with ‘perfect’ bodies and appearance; • any other reasonable response. One mark for each point correctly identified (up to a maximum of two). One mark for each point that is developed (up to a maximum of two). 4(c) Explain how the media is controlled. 6 Possible answers: • advertising – commercial/private media needs to make a profit therefore the funding from advertisers is essential to success – meaning pressure from advertisers for mass appeal content may control the media; • public service broadcasting – e.g. the BBC – the public service remit and requirements controls the media output, e.g. for the BBC they are accountable to the Government and the public through the licence fee and must ‘educate, entertain and inform’; • owners – may control the media through the instructions they give their staff, appointments of personnel who agree with their ideologies this all affects output; • controllers – e.g. editors, journalists, producers – they take day-to-day decisions on behalf of the media company that determines media content and representations (gatekeeping); • government – state owned media – often leads to propaganda and bias, e.g. Nazi Germany, North Korea, China, etc.; • censorship – dictates much media content e.g. laws on stereotyping, certification systems, watersheds, laws protecting the state, laws on obscenity, libel and slander etc.; • pluralism – media can only respond to and reflect the audience therefore the audience have the power to shape and control media content through competition and choice; • Marxism – the media is controlled by the dominant ideology of the ruling elite that keeps the population ignorant to their oppression i.e. the media is a tool of the state that prevents rebellion and social change; • hegemony – the media is still largely controlled by white, male, middle- aged, higher class individuals therefore it is their world view that is presented as normal; • feminism – the media is a tool of patriarchal oppression that maintains traditional gender roles and expectations for the benefit of men, e.g. the cult of femininity (Ferguson, McRobbie) and the male gaze (Mulvey); • any other reasonable response. Band 0 [0 marks] No creditworthy response. Band 1 [1–3 marks] Answers in this band will show only a limited awareness of the question. Responses may be short and un/underdeveloped. At the bottom of the band (1 mark), expect one weak point. Higher in the band (2–3 marks), candidates may offer more than one weak point, but there may be a tendency towards simplistic answers, engaging with sociological ideas without using sociological language. Band 2 [4–6 marks] Answers in this band will have clear and accurate explanation, showing good sociological knowledge and understanding. Sociological terms and concepts should be expected and explained. At the bottom of the band, the range of points covered may be narrow or lack detail. Higher in the band, answers will cover more than one point in a well–developed way or cover several points in less detail. 4(d) Explain why bias in the news may benefit powerful groups. 8 Possible answers: • stereotyping – the news is full of easily recognisable stereotypes based on social class, ethnicity, age or gender – the powerless groups do not have the ability to control how they are represented, the powerful decide for them, often making decisions that benefit themselves; • moral panics – powerless groups are frequently portrayed as folk devils in the news, scapegoated for society’s problems so diverting attention away from the powerful and thus benefiting them; • invisibility – the powerful people involved in producing the news typically fail to give adequate representation or reference to those less powerful groups in society and so suppress any challenges to the elite, maintaining the ‘status quo’ and their own privileges; • gatekeeping – the news is a social construction whereby content and slant/bias is based on the decisions of individuals e.g. editors – thus the news can be constructed in a way to benefit the powerful groups in society e.g. rich people (agenda setting); • the gaze (Mulvey) – the news is presented with a particular bias i.e. from a particular point of view. Feminists talk about the male gaze whereas other sociologists now also refer to the white gaze – the powerful groups (men and white people) therefore benefit in their constructed representations; • news values – this selection process means some items and stories feature in the news whilst others do not, e.g. reference to elite individuals, elite nations, mainstream topics, non-threatening to the ‘status quo’, diverting blame from the government and the capitalist class – therefore benefiting the powerful groups; • professional ideology – cultural constraints suggests that those making the news have a similar background and thus have similar norms and values, e.g. male, middle aged, higher class and white – this results in bias in the news that benefits these powerful groups; • Marxism – this theory believes the news regularly neglects the wrongdoings of large and powerful companies (e.g. corporate crimes/state crimes/tax evasion), instead selecting news stories that suit and benefit the powerful groups in society e.g. youth crime; • GUMG – the Glasgow University media group found that during coverage of industrial strikes the news coverage was biased in favour of management, positioning the audience so as not to sympathise or agree with the striking workers, thus benefiting the powerful groups; • Westernisation – despite the news now being global, there is still a Western bias to content (sometimes referred to as Americanisation) that determines which countries and cultures are covered in news programmes – this benefits the powerful, Western groups as their views and practices are seen as ‘normal’; • any other reasonable response. Band 0 [0 marks] No creditworthy response. 4(d) Band 1 [1–3 marks] Answers in this band will show only a limited awareness of the question. A tendency to description is likely. Responses may be short and undeveloped and points stated without explanation. Sociological terms and concepts are unlikely to be used. At the bottom of the band (1 mark), expect one weak point. Higher in the band (2–3 marks), candidates may offer more than one weak point. Band 2 [4–6 marks] Answers in this band will show basic sociological knowledge and understanding. Responses maybe underdeveloped and lacking in range. At the bottom of the band, candidates are unlikely to use sociological terms and concepts accurately. Higher in the band, candidates may be beginning to use sociological terms and concepts with greater accuracy. However, some aspects of the answer may only be partially developed/explained. Band 3 [7–8 marks] Answers in this band will show good sociological knowledge and understanding and will be well–developed and explained. Sociological terms and concepts will be used accurately overall. Answers will be well focused on the question and there will be a range of points presented. At the top of the band explanations will be clear throughout. 4(e) To what extent has the media been changed by the creation of the 15 internet? Possible answers: FOR: • globalisation – the internet has made media global – products are accessible from all around the world, bringing cultural diversity and new norms and values e.g. Bolly/Nollywood; • reach – the internet has allowed the media to have far more audience reach than was ever the case previously, e.g. pop ups, on-demand streaming etc.; • convergence – the internet has allowed for greater flexibility in audience media consumption as media technologies are increasingly able to perform multiple tasks and functions, e.g. smartphones for phone calls, instant messaging, streaming services, music, apps etc.; • catfishing/scamming – the internet allows greater possibilities for illegal behaviour through the media e.g. identity theft, hacking, scams etc. – often linked to social media; • virtual worlds – the internet has meant that the media can now be used to play and ‘live’ in virtual global worlds e.g. gaming, Second Life, Roblox; • interactivity – users are now directly interacting with the media because of the internet e.g. comments, forums, voting/polls etc.; • user generated content – the internet has allowed the audience to become producers as well as consumers of the media (prosumers) e.g. uploading their own material to social media; • influencers – the internet creates idols, stars and influencers, who can influence taste, fashion, opinions etc. in a way that we have never seen before (particularly young people); • social media – this allows users to communicate with people globally and instantly, e.g. social networks, dating sites, job matching platforms; • citizen journalism – the internet allows users to record footage on their mobile phones and to instantly upload it to the internet where it can be immediately consumed by large numbers of audience members; • activism – the internet allows for powerful group collectivism on a global stage; • personalisation – the internet allows for far greater personalisation of media content and functionality for the user e.g. on-demand TV, streaming services, online playlists, cookies, apps etc.; • the internet has enabled the portability of the media, it can be consumed when and where the audience member wishes to e.g. on public transport, whilst out for a run, in the doctor’s surgery etc.; • fake news – the internet has been blamed for the proliferation of fake news that the audience now consume – the lines between reality and fiction are being blurred through digital editing and image manipulation (postmodernism); • the dark web – the internet has led to the creation of the dark web that can be illegally accessed by some media users who are actively trading in and sharing in deviant media products/content; • any other reasonable response. 4(e) AGAINST: • traditional media – this remains popular despite the internet and is still often selected as the main way to consume the media e.g. books, cinema, TV, vinyl revival, billboards, radio etc.; • digital divide – not everyone uses the internet to consume media – social class, location, income and age are all relevant factors e.g. the elderly typically use the internet far less than the younger generation; • uses and gratifications theory – the media is still primarily used for entertainment, information and education – this has not changed with the advent of the internet; • norm referencing – the internet is still, like other media, a way for norms and values to be transmitted and reinforced e.g. this is how we use media to understand dominant ideologies and beliefs; • secondary socialisation – the media, internet or not, remains as a key source of secondary socialisation whereby individuals learn about their culture and its social expectations/gender roles; • stereotyping – the media, internet based or not, still relies on stereotypical representations of gender, ethnicity, age and social class these have not changed; • imitation/role models – the media is still used by some individuals as something to idolise and imitate, this has not changed with the internet e.g. violence, fashion, appearance etc. – internet influencers are just another version of this age-old phenomena; • advertising – consumer culture – both non-internet and internet-based media are used by the audience as a vehicle for consumption, creating status symbols etc. – the internet has not changed this; • platforms – there may now be a wide choice of platforms for audience members to access the media on but actually what they do on these platforms has not really altered; • passive user – most media users are passive and do not actively engage with or create media content – this has not changed; • Marxism – all media, internet based or not, is used to create conformity to the dominant ideology that benefits the ruling class elite, e.g. media concentration and conglomerate ownership; • feminism – all media, internet based or not, is used to create an acceptance of patriarchy that benefits men e.g. male gaze (Mulvey), gender roles and expectations, canalization (Oakley) etc.; • any other reasonable response. Band 0 [0 marks] No creditworthy response. Band 1 [1–4 marks] Answers in this band may be vague and largely based on common sense showing limited knowledge of the debate. Use of sociological terms or concepts is very unlikely. Responses may be short, undeveloped and one– sided. Lower in the band (1–2 marks), expect one or two weak points. Higher in the band (3–4 marks) candidates may offer more than two points and provide a weak definition of key terms in the question. 4(e) Band 2 [5–8 marks] In this band candidates will show some basic knowledge of the debate. Alternatively, they may offer an answer which is list–like in nature but there will be no real attempt to assess the issues raised by the question. There may be limited/some use of sociological terms or concepts. Responses may be underdeveloped and lack range. Answers may be simplistic and two–sided or only cover one side of the debate. Lower in the band, the response may be rather narrow in the points covered and there may be some development. Higher in the band, more points are likely to be covered with some development. Alternatively, a list–like answer with some development covering both sides of the argument may score up to 8 marks. A one–sided answer cannot score higher than 8 marks. Band 3 [9–12 marks] Answers in this band will show good sociological knowledge and understanding of the debate. Sociological terms and concepts will be used with greater accuracy and/or frequency. For the most part, answers will be well developed, focused on the questions and there will be a range of points presented. There will be a two–sided response but it may lack range on one side. At the bottom of the band, candidates may provide a narrower range of developed points. At the top of the band, expect a wider range of developed points and clear focus on the question. Band 4 [13–15 marks] Answers in this band will show excellent knowledge and understanding of the debate. There will be a strong grasp of the arguments as well as accurate and frequent use of sociological terms and concepts. Answers will be well developed, clearly focused on the question and discuss a wide range of points. Responses will be two–sided and have a range of points on each side. At the bottom of the band (13 marks), the answer may lack a specific conclusion. Higher in the band, there will be a clear attempt to offer an assessment of the ‘To what extent.?’ part of the question through a focused conclusion.
3 Sociologists use different measurements of crime. These measurements show that males commit more crime than females. There are many deterrents to crime. Sociologists debate whether formal or informal social control is more effective at preventing crime. (a) What is meant by the term ‘deterrent’? [2] (b) Describe two measurements of crime used by sociologists. [4] (c) Explain how stereotyping can affect policing. [6] (d) Explain why males commit more crime than females. [8] (e) To what extent is formal social control more effective than informal social control at preventing crime? [15] Section D: Media
35 marks
Mark scheme: 3(a) What is meant by the term ‘deterrent’? 2 One mark for a partial definition e.g. put you off crime; Two marks for a clear definition e.g. when a punishment is intended to stop the offender or others from committing an offence. 3(b) Describe two measurements of crime used by sociologists. 4 Possible answers: • official statistics – crimes recorded by the police and processed through the criminal justice system; • court records – total number of convictions for different offences and records of the social characteristics of offenders; • self-report studies – research that asks people what crimes or deviant acts they have committed; • victim surveys – research that asks people what crimes they have been victims of e.g. Crime Survey of England and Wales; • local victim surveys – e.g. Islington survey – asking people what crimes they have been victims of but focusing only on a specified local area to understand the impact of crime there; • feminist victim surveys – e.g. Walklate’s research – asking women about what crimes they have been victims of, looking specifically at domestic and sexual crimes and the fear of crime, using a qualitative methodology; • any other reasonable response. One mark for each point correctly identified (up to a maximum of two). One mark for each point that is developed (up to a maximum of two). 3(c) Explain how stereotyping can affect policing. 6 Possible answers: • moral panics – the stereotypes in moral panics affect policing as there is pressure from the public to crack down on certain crimes and criminals, e.g. Fawbert, ‘the hoodies’, Cohen ‘mods and rockers’; • police targeting – the police typically target areas where they believe crime to be found and these assumptions are typically based on stereotypes, often generated by the media e.g. inner-city areas, areas of deprivation etc.; 3(c) • stop and search rates – research shows that young black males are far more likely than any other social group to be stopped and searched by the police, showing that policing has been affected by ethnic stereotyping; • institutional racism – in the UK the McPherson Report and the Casey Report claimed that the police were racist and that racist labels and stereotypes affected every decision made; • distrust of the police – over-policing of certain areas and social groups based on negative stereotypes can result in entire communities forming a distrust of the police; • military policing – in areas stereotyped as ‘difficult’ the police will typically resort to military policing, often breeding further resentment and division; • white-collar crime – these rarely come to the attention of the police because the criminals are not negatively stereotyped and thus rarely fall under the police radar (Marxism); • police discretion – the police decide whether to arrest an individual and what to charge an offender with. Studies show this tends to be affected by stereotypes based on factors such as class, age, gender and ethnicity; • police cuffing – statistics can be manipulated by the police in order to create a good impression and make crimes ‘disappear’. This is most commonly done when the offender does not fit the typical offender stereotype (the crime may be downgraded or recorded as a false report); • police coughing – when an offender fits the stereotype of an offender the police often use pressure to improve their clear up rate e.g. encouraging the offender to admit to further crimes as well; • rioting – riots are often caused by resistance to alleged police unfairness based on stereotypes e.g. the London riots 2011 started because of allegations of police racism; • BLM – the political movement erupted due to accusations of police brutality and institutional racism, alleging the police operated using racial profiling and racist stereotypes and assumptions of offenders; • chivalry factor – Pollak – the police may not believe that a female could be a serious criminal as she does not fit the stereotype, therefore women are more likely to be released without charge or charged with a lesser offence; • double deviance – Heidensohn – studies show that when a woman has committed a heinous crime the police will be tougher on her than with more stereotypically feminine women e.g. Myra Hindley; • typical delinquent – Cicourel – this study shows that the police have a stereotypical image in their heads of who the offenders are most likely to be and that this affects their arrest rate and responses to crime, e.g. male, black, young, poor; • any other reasonable response. Band 0 [0 marks] No creditworthy response. Band 1 [1–3 marks] Answers in this band will show only a limited awareness of the question. Responses may be short and un/underdeveloped. At the bottom of the band (1 mark), expect one weak point. Higher in the band (2–3 marks), candidates may offer more than one weak point, but there may be a tendency towards simplistic answers, engaging with sociological ideas without using sociological language. 3(c) Band 2 [4–6 marks] Answers in this band will have clear and accurate explanation, showing good sociological knowledge and understanding. Sociological terms and concepts should be expected and explained. At the bottom of the band, the range of points covered may be narrow or lack detail. Higher in the band, answers will cover more than one point in a well-developed way or cover several points in less detail. 3(d) Explain why males commit more crime than females. 8 Possible answers: • socialisation – Oakley – boys and girls are still socialised differently, leading males to be more aggressive and assertive and females to be more passive – it is not surprising then that males commit more crime; • social control – males are typically less controlled by parents and thus are more likely to be in the public spaces where crime can occur, compared to girls in their ‘bedroom culture’ (McRobbie); • opportunity – in a patriarchal world, males still have more opportunities to commit crime than females e.g. white-collar and corporate crime require individuals to be in the workplace – more likely to be males than females; • asserting masculinity – the need for males to ‘prove’ their hegemonic masculinity in an increasingly feminised world has led many sociologists to believe that crime is an extension of the quest for male dominance, e.g. violence, sexual assault, domestic abuse etc.; • risk-taking behaviour – postmodernists believe the normal behaviour of males is closely aligned to criminality and their love for adventure and risk often leads them to transgress (Edgework); • gang culture – gangs are male dominated and in many areas/countries are seen as a viable career for males – illegitimate opportunity structures (Cloward and Ohlin); • male role models – stars and celebrities that influence young males are often linked to drugs, violence, misogyny etc. and this can cause males to imitate their crimes; • status frustration – Cohen’s study showed that boys suffered from this with high rates of male unemployment and the decline of manual work, they turned to crime to compensate and gain status; • instrumental role – the stereotype still abounds that men should be the provider and breadwinner in the family – if they are unable to live up to the demands of this role they may turn to instrumental crime instead; • biology – boys are physically stronger and have more testosterone which many researchers believe leads to them being naturally more criminal than females; • educational qualifications – boys do less well at school than girls so are often unable to access the top jobs with high pay and so turn to crime to compensate; • any other reasonable response. Band 0 [0 marks] No creditworthy response. 3(d) Band 1 [1–3 marks] Answers in this band will show only a limited awareness of the question. A tendency to description is likely. Responses may be short and undeveloped and points stated without explanation. Sociological terms and concepts are unlikely to be used. At the bottom of the band (1 mark), expect one weak point. Higher in the band (2–3 marks), candidates may offer more than one weak point. Band 2 [4–6 marks] Answers in this band will show basic sociological knowledge and understanding. Responses may be underdeveloped and lacking in range. At the bottom of the band, candidates are unlikely to use sociological terms and concepts accurately. Higher in the band, candidates may be beginning to use sociological terms and concepts with greater accuracy. However, some aspects of the answer may only be partially developed/explained. Band 3 [7–8 marks] Answers in this band will show good sociological knowledge and understanding and will be well-developed and explained. Sociological terms and concepts will be used accurately overall. Answers will be well-focused on the question and there will be a range of points presented. At the top of the band explanations will be clear throughout. 3(e) To what extent is formal social control more effective than informal 15 social control at preventing crime? Possible answers: FOR • police – power of arrest, deterrence, patrols etc. all effectively control individuals and society in order to make us conform to the rules and so prevent crime; • prison – individuals lose their liberty and have severe restrictions on freedom in order to ensure compliance through the ‘fear factor’ that prevents crime; • government – they set the laws and give authority to the formal agents that makes us conform – these legally approved powers are highly effective e.g. pandemic restrictions; • armed forces – they use force and weapons in order to make us conform to the laws and so prevent crime, they are also often brought in to support the police in times of anomie e.g. riots, social unrest etc.; • courts – their power of sentencing means they can control and change our lives thus making us conform and not commit crime; • school sanctions – Marxists see schools as micro versions of society therefore the formal sanctions used to control indoctrinate us for when we leave school and so prevent crime; • workplace sanctions – the fear of losing our jobs or being demoted makes us conform to the system and not commit workplace crime e.g. stealing from shops, white-collar crime etc.; • segregation – deviants are increasingly removed from the community on order to prevent crime e.g. detention centres, isolation units, prisons etc.; • surveillance – our behaviour is closely monitored daily to increase public safety and to prevent crime; • medical interventions – the state is increasingly allowed to intervene in 3(e) human lives in order to prevent crime e.g. sectioning patients, castration, medication etc.; • capital and corporal punishment – the fear of losing your life or being beaten is used in many countries to prevent crime, serving as a warning function to society (functionalism); • religious laws – e.g. Shariah law – sometimes religion becomes a formal part of the law and thus is central in preventing crime; • authority and power – all of the formal methods of social control are backed by the law and thus have more authority than informal methods – this may well make them more effective at preventing crime; • any other reasonable response. AGAINST: • primary socialisation – functionalists believe that the best way to prevent crime is through effective socialisation in the nuclear family therefore informal methods are more effective than formal; • New Right – Murray believes that crime is caused through underclass values and a lack of discipline in society, stigmatising lone parents and their children and ensuring father figures are present to discipline children is how crime is prevented i.e. informally; • education – the hidden curriculum is seen by Marxists as a key method of control as it is crucial for ensuring social conformity and therefore preventing crime; • media – reporting criminal behaviour in the media informs people about behaviour that will be punished and reinforces shared norms and values – this is far more effective at preventing crime than formal methods; • religion – religious norms and values outlaw crime and thus is a very effective way to prevent crime e.g. The Ten Commandments; • peers – young people are heavily influenced by peer pressure therefore positive peer groups are the best way to prevent crime from happening e.g. pro-school subcultures; • role models – young people are fully immersed in digital and social media (postmodernism) and are heavily influenced by celebrities and influencers– using such figures to prevent crime will be far more effective than using formal methods; • recidivism – the high rates of re-offending in most societies show that formal methods do not prevent crime; • preventative rather than reactive – schemes that prevent crime from happening can only be effective if they are informal as the formal agents and methods do not really take place unless criminal behaviour has already occurred; • personal relationships – feelings of guilt and not wanting to let someone down (informal) are thought by many to be far more effective at preventing crime than the impersonal measures used by formal agents; • community/youth schemes and interventions – these informal methods are favoured by many sociologists as the best way to prevent crime – through raising young people’s self-esteem, giving them a positive focus (e.g. sport) and a sense of belonging; • any other reasonable response. 3(e) Band 0 [0 marks] No creditworthy response. Band 1 [1–4 marks] Answers in this band may be vague and largely based on common sense showing limited knowledge of the debate. Use of sociological terms or concepts is very unlikely. Responses may be short, undeveloped and one- sided. Lower in the band (1–2 marks), expect one or two weak points. Higher in the band (3–4 marks) candidates may offer more than two points and provide a weak definition of key terms in the question. Band 2 [5–8 marks] In this band candidates will show some basic knowledge of the debate. Alternatively, they may offer an answer which is list-like in nature but there will be no real attempt to assess the issues raised by the question. There may be limited/some use of sociological terms or concepts. Responses may be underdeveloped and lack range. Answers may be simplistic and two-sided or only cover one side of the debate. Lower in the band, the response may be rather narrow in the points covered and there may be some development. Higher in the band, more points are likely to be covered with some development. Alternatively, a list-like answer with some development covering both sides of the argument may score up to 8 marks. A one-sided answer cannot score higher than 8 marks. Band 3 [9–12 marks] Answers in this band will show good sociological knowledge and understanding of the debate. Sociological terms and concepts will be used with greater accuracy and/or frequency. For the most part, answers will be well- developed, focused on the questions and there will be a range of points presented. There will be a two-sided response but it may lack range on one side. At the bottom of the band, candidates may provide a narrower range of developed points. At the top of the band, expect a wider range of developed points and clear focus on the question. Band 4 [13–15 marks] Answers in this band will show excellent knowledge and understanding of the debate. There will be a strong grasp of the arguments as well as accurate and frequent use of sociological terms and concepts. Answers will be well- developed, clearly focused on the question and discuss a wide range of points. Responses will be two-sided and have a range of points on each side. At the bottom of the band (13 marks), the answer may lack a specific conclusion. Higher in the band, there will be a clear attempt to offer an assessment of the ‘To what extent.?’ part of the question through a focused conclusion.
3 (a) Define the term: (i) peer group [2] (ii) hate crime. [2] (b) State two strengths of using official statistics to measure crime. [2] (c) Explain three reasons why people commit instrumental crime. [6] (d) Explain three aspects of the postmodern view of crime. [6] (e) Discuss the view that crime and deviance vary cross-culturally. Your answer should include: • at least three developed points with evidence. [8] (f) Evaluate the view that non-custodial sentencing is the most effective type of punishment. Your answer should include: • at least three arguments for and three arguments against • a conclusion. [14]
40 marks
Mark scheme: 3(a)(i) Define the term peer group. 2 Award one mark for a partial definition, e.g. your friends. Award two marks for a clear definition, e.g. people of the same status and age. 3(a)(ii) Define the term hate crime. 2 Award one mark for a partial definition, e.g. racial assault. Award two marks for a clear definition, e.g. offences in which the victim is targeted because of certain characteristics e.g. religion, age, sexuality or race. 3(b) State two strengths of using official statistics to measure crime. 2 Award one mark for each correct strength (up to a maximum of two). Possible responses: • patterns and trends in crimes committed can be easily seen; • quantitative data means comparisons over time/between social groups can easily be made; • they show what types of people are offenders and victims; • they are published online and so are easily accessible and free; • they can be used to see what crimes are increasing and what crimes are decreasing; • they are typically published every year and so are up to date; • they are published by the government and based on police and court records so can be trusted; • they show data for an entire nation and so are both representative and generalisable; • they are reliable – standardised data; • any other reasonable response. 3(c) Explain three reasons why people commit instrumental crime. 6 Award one mark for each point correctly identified (up to a maximum of three). Award one mark for each point that is developed (up to a maximum of three). Possible responses: • for money – financial reasons such as poverty and material deprivation can lead some people to instrumental crime; • capitalist consumer culture – even higher class people may commit instrumental crimes e.g. white-collar/corporate crime as a way to maximise profit, • due to a lack of opportunity – high unemployment rates and reduced job opportunities may lead some people to commit crime; • to improve social position – instrumental crime can increase status and position within the hierarchy (e.g. gangs) which cannot be achieved legitimately – Cohen’s status frustration; • for material possessions – relative deprivation, the feeling of having less than others in your community/society, often fuelled by the media may lead some people to commit instrumental crimes as a way to gain these desirable goods; • due to prejudice and discrimination – instrumental crime may be the intended response to perceived inequalities that leaves the perpetrator feeling disillusioned about the unfairness of society i.e. being unable to get a job s/he is qualified for; • a means of resistance – the feeling experienced by many marginalised groups of being targeted and treated unjustly by the police may lead to instrumental crimes e.g. BLM protests, riots and looting as forms of instrumental crimes; • to prove masculinity – the culture of masculinity means some males may commit instrumental crime in order to prove or increase their masculinity e.g. violence/assault; • any other reasonable response. 3(d) Explain three aspects of the postmodern view of crime. 6 Award one mark for each point correctly identified (up to a maximum of three). Award one mark for each point that is developed (up to a maximum of three). Possible responses: • individualism – reasons for crime cannot be generalised as every individual has their own personal reasons for committing crimes meaning all the traditional sociological explanations are flawed; • social construction of crime – there is no definite, agreed definition of crime as crime varies enormously over time and between cultures. This means there is no point investigating why people become criminals because certain behaviours may or may not be criminal in different cultures and at different times; • crime as fun – Katz – crime is seen to be exciting and fun and therefore for young people this is the reason it’s committed; • edgework – Lyng – crime is about risk taking behaviour as a temporary escape from societies rules, control and boundaries; • harm caused by crime – postmodernists believe we should study more about the harm caused by crime to society and individuals e.g. green or corporate crimes; • emotional link – crime may be related to individual feelings and emotions in a particular moment or context rather than being caused by wider social and structural factors; • any other reasonable response. 3(e) Discuss the view that crime and deviance vary cross-culturally. 8 Use Table A to mark answers to this question. Possible responses: • laws – some things are legal in some countries but illegal in others e.g. possession of cannabis; • morals – in the West monogamy is valued and marrying more than one person at a time would be considered a criminal offence whereas in other cultures polygamy is both legal and widely accepted; • religion – this may directly affect the laws e.g. Shariah law in Islamic nations affects every part of an individual’s life in contrast to civil laws and secular cultures; • sub-cultures – what is defined as deviant in some sub-cultures is not the same as others e.g. punks have brightly coloured Mohican hairstyles and ripped, offensive clothing whereas this is not deemed acceptable or appropriate by wider society; • social class – Miller ‘focal concerns’ – working class culture can be linked to street culture and low level criminality and Miller’s research found that this was accepted as a normal part of life whereas for other social classes this would be viewed as deviant and unacceptable; • age – younger people are more likely to push the boundaries and engage in criminal/deviant behaviour than older people because it is seen as fun, risk-taking behaviour (Katz & Lyng); • ethnicity – some ethnic groups may have cultural practices that infringe the laws of a country e.g. possession of marijuana in the UK is illegal and yet is commonly used by some ethnic groups; • gender expectations – in Afghanistan the Taliban have no state-run domestic abuse shelters for female victims and instead send them to prison, girls cannot get a secondary or higher education and they are banned from many public places. These laws themselves would be considered criminal and deviant in many other cultures; • punishment – some countries use capital/corporal/physical punishment to deal with criminals e.g. the Middle East, whereas other countries adopt a more rehabilitative approach to crime e.g. Scandinavia; • tribal culture – Mead, New Guinea – feminine characteristics and behaviour of males was the norm in one of the tribes she studied compared to hegemonic masculinity and a stigmatisation of feminine males as deviant in the West; • gangs – gang culture normalises and, indeed, values criminal and deviant behaviour such as violence and murder whereas wider society condemns this and perceives it as criminality; • any other reasonable response. 3(f) Evaluate the view that non-custodial sentencing is the most effective type 14 of punishment. Use Table B to mark answers to this question. Possible responses for: • community sentencing – the offender is made to do unpaid, compulsory work for a set period of time. This is typically related to the offence in some way e.g. a conviction for vandalism may result in a sentence where property has to be repaired. This teaches the offender about the consequences of crime making them reconsider their future actions; • financial penalties – this kind of sentence is often used for less serious crimes whereby a sum of money must be paid by the offender to the court and/or the victim as punishment for the crime committed. In a capitalist society this can be more effective than prison as money is highly valued and so by losing this an offender will be put off from re-offending in the future (deterrence); • rehabilitation programs outside prison – this could be for addiction, education and training or mental health – these often run alongside other non-custodial sentences and ensure that the offender is ‘treated’ so that the chance of future re-offending is lessened as the issue causing crime is no longer there; • capital punishment – some countries and states operate the death penalty as they do not believe that prison is a serious enough sentence for the most awful, heinous crimes. Capital punishment protects citizens and sends a clear message to prolific offenders that crime will not be tolerated, so deterring them from a life of crime; • corporal punishment – a physical punishment that causes pain e.g. flogging or whipping. The shame of such a public punishment is enough to deter many from committing crime whilst for others if this punishment is imposed it is something that they do not wish to repeat – again making it an effective form of punishment; • exile and ostracism – having to leave one’s home and community, receiving an injunction or a restraining order and/or being shunned by the community is an effective punishment as it firstly prevents the crime from happening and secondly places feelings of guilt onto the offender that are not desirable. This thus also deters others from committing crimes; • surveillance – e.g. curfews, electronic tagging and having to avoid certain areas/people – by watching the offender criminal behaviour is prevented as they must follow the rules imposed or face more severe sanctions. These restrictions mean that the offender will not be tempted to re-offend and that the public are safe, making it a very effective punishment for crime; • probation – a period of time within which the offender is monitored within the community – the offender is closely monitored by the authorities and also has regular meetings with a probation officer who can help with training and employment needs. It is an effective way of checking whether an offender has been reformed and is safe to live within the community without offending, thus making it a very effective form of punishment; 3(f) • police cautions – for minor offences when the offender accepts their guilt, an official police warning is given as a sentence rather that anything more serious. This is a cost effective and quick way of dealing with more minor offences with a clear message to offenders that any further law breaking will result in more serious consequences; • social media and vigilante groups – the growth of social media means that messages, images and posts spread quickly. Being threatened or attacked by members of the community is a big deterrent to offenders as is the thought of their image being all over the internet. This makes it an effective form of punishment; • informal methods of punishment – fear of letting loved ones down, family and friends, and being shamed through the crimes committed can be the worst form of punishment due to the emotional connections involved. This therefore prevents crime as individuals do not want to face stigma and shame from family/peers/teachers/colleagues etc.; • cost – non-custodial sentencing is often a cheaper alternative than incarceration and this means that it can be thought of as more effective for a country as more of it can be offered with the aim of reducing crime; • any other reasonable response. Possible responses against: • prison as a deterrent through loss of freedom – this is the most effective type of punishment because prisons are negatively represented in the media and people know that if they are incarcerated there will be a loss of liberty. This all helps to put people off from committing crimes – far more so than non-custodial sentencing; • prison prevents further offending in society – non-custodial sentencing cannot guarantee that the offender will not commit another crime whereas prison can contain the individual, remove them from society and thus prevent offending from being able to take place; • prison rehabilitation programs – access to education, training, addiction treatment and therapy/counselling are far easier and cheaper to access inside prisons than outside. In terms of rehabilitation, this therefore means that custodial sentencing is most effective as it is the way most criminals will access support to help them not offend again; • poor living conditions in prison – in many countries the prison regime is tough and unappealing. This is also the image portrayed through the media. This ensures prison is seen as a deterrent to crime and is an effective punishment; • restorative justice in prisons – new programs have been introduced into many prisons whereby offender and victim (or victim’s family) are able to meet and talk as a way to ensure offenders realise the impact their criminality has on others. The success rates in terms of reduced rates of re-offending is high, showing the effectiveness of custodial sentences; • severity of prison regimes – having limited freedom, reducing social contact, making work compulsory and forcing accountability for the crimes committed can only happen through custodial sentencing – this makes this form of punishment more effective than any non-custodial sentences can be; 3(f) • Scandinavian prisons, an alternative approach – not all prison systems have high levels of recidivism, violence and anti-social behaviour. Custodial sentencing can be gentler and more rehabilitative, as in places like Norway and Sweden, and in such a context the custodial sentences are the most effective punishment as they are able to combine re- socialisation with a removal of the offender from the criminal context and the criminal connections; • New Right criticisms of non-custodial sentencing as being ‘too soft’ on crime – the right wing view is that the only way to effectively punish criminals and reduce repeat offending is to ‘get tough on crime’. Policies such as zero tolerance and three strikes are thought to be far more effective deterrents than any of the non-custodial options; • public safety – prisons are the only method of punishment that can guarantee the public’s safety as the offender is removed from society and locked away. Custodial sentencing is thus more effective than non- custodial. • informal social control – it may be the informal agencies that are the most effective at preventing crime as they are able to socialise and inculcate individuals at an early age into conformity and the view that crime is wrong; • any other reasonable response.
3 (a) Define the term: (i) vigilante groups [2] (ii) misogyny. [2] (b) State two features of gang culture. [2] (c) Describe three ways the police can control individuals. [6] (d) Explain three limitations of the interactionist explanation of crime and deviance. [6] (e) Discuss the view that prison prevents crime. Your answer should include: • at least three developed points with evidence. [8] (f) Evaluate the view that gender is the most important factor in explaining why an individual commits crime. Your answer should include: • at least three arguments for and three arguments against • a conclusion. [14]
40 marks
Mark scheme: 3(a)(i) Define the term vigilante groups. 2 Award one mark for a partial definition, e.g. take the law into your own hands. Award two marks for a clear definition, e.g. self-appointed people with no legal authority who punish people they believe are offenders. 3(a)(ii) Define the term misogyny. 2 Award one mark for a partial definition, e.g. sexism. Award two marks for a clear definition, e.g. hatred of women, predominantly by men. 3(b) State two features of gang culture. 2 Award one mark for each correct feature (up to a maximum of two). Possible responses: • often comprised of young people; • often comprised of males; • often comprised of ethnic minorities; • criminal and/or violent behaviour as the norm e.g. drug dealing; • organised group of people, usually with a clear hierarchy and leader; • often territorial in nature e.g. postcode gangs; • often involves an initiation process, a ‘test’ to prove one’s loyalty to the gang; • often associated with deprived, inner-city areas (working class); • defending the gang and not reporting crime to the police is highly valued; • people may join gangs for protection e.g. from racist attacks; • associated gang ‘uniform’ e.g. wearing particular colours; • gang symbols/markers e.g. tattoos; • any other reasonable response. 3(c) Describe three ways the police can control individuals. 6 Award one mark for each point correctly identified (up to a maximum of three). Award one mark for each point that is developed (up to a maximum of three). Possible responses: • police cautions – where the offender accepts their guilt the police can give police cautions for minor offences. This is recorded on a criminal record and so acts as a warning to offenders; • police targeting – the police can focus on a particular area or group of people because they believe they are more likely to be involved in criminal behaviour e.g. ethnic minorities, inner-city areas – this constant police presence controls individuals; • stop and search – this police control method is used to focus on those in society the police believe most likely to have committed a crime and gives the police the power to stop and search them – it is often based on stereotyping and has even led to police brutality e.g. BLM; • police surveillance – citizens are under almost constant surveillance and this feeling of being watched and monitored results in most people being controlled into not committing crimes e.g. CCTV, tagging etc.; • community policing – working with the community, visibly on patrol, building good relationships based on trust – encourages individuals to report crime to the police and so is able to control; • military policing – police are often armed and perceived as ‘outsiders’, sent to areas of unrest where they have no understanding of the community, rather like an invading army; force and fear is used to control; • power of arrest – the police have the power to arrest individuals and so control them through expectations of conformity as no one wants to be arrested and be subject to the criminal justice system and the fear of gaining a criminal record; • zero tolerance policing – the police acted against minor offences e.g. possession of drugs, littering, to send a message to criminals that no crime would be tolerated (NYC, broken windows theory) – this effectively controlled individuals as the crime rate fell; • deterrence – police presence aims to be a deterrent to criminal behaviour, going so far as to use cardboard cut outs to mimic officers and create social conformity; • any other reasonable response. 3(d) Explain three limitations of the interactionist explanation of crime and 6 deviance. Award one mark for each point correctly identified (up to a maximum of three). Award one mark for each point that is developed (up to a maximum of three). Possible responses: • deviance created through labelling – most people know they are breaking norms and laws even if their actions are not detected, so deviance is not created by the label as Interactionists say; • passive victims – labelling theory tends to imply that deviants are the passive victims of the labels applied to them but individuals can and do choose to be deviant, whether they have been labelled or not; • origins of labelling – labelling theory does not fully explain why some people are labelled and others are not, or why some activities are against the law and others are not; • criminals as victims of labelling – the theory implies this is the case but the label may have been applied because of a deviant or criminal act which caused serious harm and so should be condemned; • dark figure of crime – labelling theory fails to explain why some people commit crimes even when they have not been publicly labelled e.g. females and the higher classes; • crime and deviance are socially constructed – interactionists fail to take into account the fact that some behaviour would always be seen as deviant, whatever the context or social reaction e.g. murder; • folk devils and moral panics cause more crime – this can be criticised by the idea that people do not passively accept what they consume in the media, they are active and questioning and critical; • moral panic theory as outdated – as new media becomes more interactive and consumer led, so moral panic theory starts to seem outdated as there is no longer a centralised source of information meaning the media cannot create moral panics in the same way it perhaps used to (e.g. mods and rockers); • any other reasonable response. 3(e) Discuss the view that prison prevents crime. 8 Use Table A to mark answers to this question. Possible responses: • incapacitation – preventing the offender from committing more crime by imprisoning them and removing their freedom; • deterrence – prison puts people off committing crime because they are aware of the consequences of being imprisoned e.g. loss of liberty, limited time with family, harsh conditions etc.; • rehabilitation – education and training programs within prison help to prevent crime by changing the offender’s attitude and behaviour. This will improve their job prospects on release; • causes of criminality – counselling or treatment for addiction may be available when in prison and by tackling the root cause of the offending further criminality can be prevented; • restorative justice – when in prison offenders can be asked to meet with their victims so the offender can hear about the way their offending has impacted and affected the victim. By understanding the impact of their actions, offenders can be motivated to change and so further crime is prevented; • harsh reality of prison life – in many prisons facilities are minimal and conditions are tough, bullying is rife and prisoners are locked away for hours on end with little to do – media representations of such prisons can prevent crime as people do not want to live in such a way; • juvenile detention – by giving young offenders a ‘short, sharp, shock’ further criminal behaviour can be prevented as young people realise that their actions have consequences and perhaps see first-hand that prison life is not the glamourous, edgy lifestyle it can sometimes be portrayed as; • any other reasonable response. 3(f) Evaluate the view that gender is the most important factor in explaining 14 why an individual commits crime. Use Table B to mark answers to this question. Possible responses for: • official statistics – the patterns and trends in the OCS reveal that males are far more likely than females to commit a crime which indicates that gender is a very significant factor in determining criminality; • chivalry thesis – Pollak – females are less likely to be charged or convicted of crimes than males because they are treated differently by the criminal justice system – this leads to females being under- represented in the official statistics and shows how important gender is in terms of crime; • culture of masculinity – males are still expected to be hegemonic and this pressure may lead them to crime as they have to assert their masculinity to others e.g. through violence, power, humiliation; • gendered socialisation – boys and girls are socialised differently (e.g. Oakley’s theory) and this may explain the higher rates of offending for males – boys are encouraged to be more active and aggressive whereas girls are encouraged to be passive and docile; • social control – females are more strictly controlled by the agents of social control than are males and this therefore limits their chances of becoming criminal e.g. McRobbie’s ‘bedroom culture’ shows how girls are at home more than boys – if boys are out on the streets without parental figures to control them then they are much more likely to be drawn into criminal behaviour; • misogyny – the idea of seeing women as lesser, inferior and a threat to men – misogynists assert their perceived dominance over females in many ways, some of which are deviant and criminal, e.g. harassment, domestic violence, sexual assault and even murder; • lack of opportunity – males may turn to crime if other routes to material success are blocked for them as they are still perceived as breadwinners in most societies e.g. instrumental crime; • gang culture – there are more males than females in gangs and some gangs are exclusively male – if there is a strong gang culture in an area then this can often lead males into criminal behaviour (Cloward and Ohlin‘s ‘illegitimate opportunity structure’); • police targeting and stereotyping – if the police and the criminal justice system think that males are more likely to be criminal than females then they are likely to target them and thus arrest them more often; this may lead to deviancy amplification amongst males and so perpetuate the stereotype of male as criminal; • feminism – males may feel threatened by the rise of women in society and the perceived threat to their dominance and high status, thus crime may be a way for men to control women and ‘keep them in their place’ e.g. patriarchy, gaslighting, coercion, domestic abuse etc.; • any other reasonable response. 3(f) Possible responses against: • dark figure of crime – it is impossible to know whether gender is a key indicator in criminality as there is so much crime that we do not know about, the unreported and unrecorded crimes; • unofficial measures of crime – victim surveys and self-report studies reveal different patterns and trends to the official statistics and perhaps contradict the notion that crime is linked to masculinity, if females offend as well then is gender really that important?; • social class – crime is disproportionately committed by those in the lower social classes and it is perhaps this social factor rather than gender that is most important in determining criminality (e.g. poverty, relative deprivation, status frustration, strain theory etc.); • ethnicity – crime is disproportionately committed by ethnic minorities therefore perhaps ethnicity is a more significant factor than gender (e.g. racism, police targeting, gangs etc.); • age – most crime is committed by young people and therefore perhaps age is a more significant factor than gender (e.g. media stereotyping, status frustration etc.); • peer group – the peer group someone is a part of may be more important than their gender in determining whether or not they commit crime e.g. peer pressure, pro or anti-school subculture etc.; • individualism – reasons for crime cannot be generalised and are often individual and personal, this view means that gender is not significant in determining whether someone is likely to commit crime; • postmodernism – crime is not caused by gender but instead by the search for thrills and excitement which can be relevant to anybody, regardless of their gender; • labelling theory – it is not just males that are labelled as criminals, other social groups are as well, therefore, to pick just one social factor as being most influential seems misleading – intersectionality; • any other reasonable response.
2 (a) Define the term: (i) linguistic factors [2] (ii) conformity. [2] (b) Give two examples of an ethnocentric curriculum. [2] (c) Describe three benefits of attending private school. [6] (d) Explain three limitations of the functionalist view of education. [6] (e) Discuss how boys and girls experience school differently. Your answer should include: • at least three developed points with evidence. [8] (f) Evaluate the view that cultural factors have the most impact on educational achievement. Your answer should include: • at least three arguments for and three arguments against • a conclusion. [14] Crime, deviance and social control
40 marks
Mark scheme: 2(a)(i) Define the term linguistic factors. 2 Award one mark for a partial definition, e.g. language. Award two marks for a clear definition, e.g. the type of language children speak e.g. restricted and elaborated codes. 2(a)(ii) Define the term conformity. 2 Award one mark for a partial definition, e.g. fitting in. Award two marks for a clear definition, e.g. behaviour that follows the usual standards and expectations of a group, culture and/or society. 2(b) Give two examples of an ethnocentric curriculum. 2 Award one mark for each correct example (up to a maximum of two). Possible responses: • host nation – their norms, values and beliefs are embedded into the educational curriculum; • language teaching – the language and cultures of ethnic minority learners may be seen by the school as being of lesser value; • teaching of literature – poetry and books from the culture of ethnic minority learners may not be considered worth studying; • teaching of history – learners from ethnic minority groups may learn nothing about their own people’s experiences; • religion and worship in assemblies – the ethnic minority learners’ beliefs may be ignored and they may even be forced to follow the practices of the majority; • celebration of festivals based on the dominant culture – ethnic minority learners’ festivals may be ignored; • any other reasonable response. 2(c) Describe three benefits of attending private school. 6 Award one mark for each point correctly identified (up to a maximum of three). Award one mark for each point that is developed (up to a maximum of three). Possible responses: • class sizes – classes in private schools tend to be smaller, so individual learners get more attention from the teacher; • more choice in curriculum – private schools do not have to follow a national curriculum so they can concentrate on teaching what they believe to be most important and/or what their parents want; • parental choice – private schools are very diverse institutions and so parents can choose the school that best suits their children’s needs; • money and funding – private schools have more money than state schools meaning they have better resources and facilities for the students e.g. swimming pools, ICT, science equipment etc., often also resulting in better results; • social capital – Bourdieu – private schools allow students to make networks and connections that can help them find employment in high status professions and companies in the future; • extra-curricular opportunities – private schools are renowned for the plethora of extra-curricular activities on offer, allowing students to experience a wide variety of sports, culture, arts, theatre etc. and so increasing cultural capital (Bourdieu); • life chances and social mobility – private schools typically gain better examination results than the state sector meaning that students have better chances of entering highly paid and high status fields of employment; • any other reasonable response. 2(d) Explain three limitations of the functionalist view of education. 6 Award one mark for each point correctly identified (up to a maximum of three). Award one mark for each point that is developed (up to a maximum of three). Possible responses: • lack of shared values – functionalists are wrong to suggest there is a shared set of values in education. Marxists say that the values passed on are those of the ruling class whereas feminists say they are the patriarchal values. Subcultures also challenge the notion of shared values; • myth of meritocracy – education is not equal and fair – many factors can affect a student’s experience of education and their educational success that have nothing to do with effort or ability e.g. quality of the school, home background, peer group, gender, social class, ethnicity etc.; • connection between school and work – functionalist claims that there is a strong link between school and work are false. Adults at work use little of what they have learnt at school, companies often complain about low literacy and numeracy skills of school leavers – learners are taught things they do not need instead of things that would be useful in the workplace; • selection for employment – functionalists are incorrect to claim that educational achievement will determine which job one enters – people are often selected for a job role dependent upon their gender, ethnicity, age and social class; • setting by ability – functionalists ignore the role that teacher expectations and judgements play in determining which set or stream a student finds themselves in, it is not always based on academic ability e.g. higher sets are dominated by the higher social classes; • socialisation – many other agencies exist where socialisation can take place, education is not essential for this e.g. peer group, family, media, religion; • stigma of vocationalism – whilst vocationalism does exist in educational systems, functionalists ignore the fact that it is seen as a less prestigious, less important form of education, often assigned to the lower social classes; • any other reasonable response. 2(e) Discuss how boys and girls experience school differently. 8 Use Table A to mark answers to this question. Possible responses: • schooling for boys – boys have historically been more likely to go to school and get qualifications as schooling for boys was, and still is in many cultures, seen to be more important than for girls; • leaving school earlier – girls may leave school earlier than boys due to their cultural expectations, e.g. getting married, having children (e.g. traveller children); • high expectations – due to feminism girls often have high career aspirations and will work hard to get what they want and achieve their goals, following their female successful role models (Sharpe). Males may not experience this as they look towards manual work, following in their father’s footsteps etc. and so do not engage as much with education and teachers; • engagement with learning – sociologists think education in schools may be more suited to a girl’s socialisation than a boy’s socialisation as the focus is on conformity, submitting to authority, being quiet, reading and writing. Thus girls may experience school as a more familiar and comfortable place than boys; • subject choice – this is still quite stereotypical and may be explained by gender socialisation, e.g. boys are more likely to choose technical and sports-based subjects e.g. engineering or PE, whereas girls are more likely to choose communication/thinking based subjects e.g. sociology, history or literature; • teacher expectations – boys and girls may be treated differently in schools e.g. teachers may see poor study habits and rowdy behaviour as normal for boys whilst similar behaviour from girls is not tolerated; • peer groups – boys are more likely to reject school values and form anti-school sub-cultures (e.g. Willis ‘the lads’) whereas girls are conformist and more likely to be part of a pro-school sub-culture; • study habits – girls tend to work harder than boys, engage more in lessons, do more homework and be better organised – this may be down to socialisation, peer pressure, maturity levels and pressure to be masculine/feminine – thus experiences of boys and girls in school are very different; • hidden curriculum – this may send the message that expectations of males and females in schools are different e.g. boys are often asked to carry heavy boxes, girls to tidy the classroom – gender roles are experienced differently; • hierarchy – despite teaching being a female dominated profession, there are fewer women in positions of authority in schools meaning the system can be seen as quite patriarchal. This may socialise girls into believing that management and leadership is something boys, not girls, do, so resulting in a different experience of school to boys; 2(e) • male advantage – girls face the following problems in education: lack of confidence in their ability, dominance of boys in the classroom, receiving less teacher time than boys, different teacher expectations (feminism, e.g. Dale Spender). All of these factors means that the experience of school is very different for girls when compared to boys; • access to education – globally, in developing countries in particular, boys’ education is prioritised over girls’ education meaning many girls remain uneducated. Going to school can be difficult for girls at times, e.g. in Africa many schools have no toilets meaning girls will often not attend when they have their period. Experiences are thus very different; • any other reasonable response. 2(f) Evaluate the view that cultural factors have the most impact on 14 educational achievement. Use Table B to mark answers to this question. Possible responses for: • fatalism – working class children may feel that they are not in control of their own fate and cannot change their destiny so there is no point in them studying at school; • immediate gratification – being unable to see the benefits of long-term rewards (deferred gratification) meaning that working class children may want to start earning money as soon as possible rather than studying which would bring the long-term reward of better pay and a higher status career; • thrills and excitement – working class children, especially boys, may turn to deviant activities as a source of excitement in an otherwise boring life – culture of masculinity – which could lead them into trouble, so negatively affecting their education; • valuing education – some parents do not value education, perhaps because they had negative experiences themselves, and this attitude is internalised by their children too; • cultural capital – working class children may lack the cultural capital (tastes, values and behaviour) that higher class children have (Bourdieu) e.g. being unfamiliar with theatre, galleries, books etc.; • linguistic factors – Bernstein – middle class children are more likely to be confident using elaborated code than working class children who are more exposed to restricted code which has no value in education; • ethnicity – Archer’s research demonstrated how culture can be so influential on educational achievement through her research into the Chinese community in the UK – parental attitudes, values and expectations of their children determined their success (similar to the ‘Tiger mums’ findings); • any other reasonable response. 2(f) Possible responses against: • material factors – material deprivation may be more important than cultural factors in explaining educational achievement e.g. not having a quiet place to study, unable to afford resources and equipment, having part time jobs to help support the family etc.; • in-school factors – Rutter’s research indicates that the most important factor in determining educational success is whether or not you attend a ‘good school‘, not cultural factors; • home factors – lack of successful role models in the family. If a child does not know someone who has benefitted from doing well in education then they are unlikely to see its benefits themselves; • community factors – children may be tempted into gangs/deviant behaviour if they live in communities blighted by drugs and crime – this will affect their chances of educational success; • peer group – whether a student belongs to a pro- or an anti-school subculture may be the most important influence on how well they do in education (e.g. Willis); • type of school – students attending private and/or selective education are more likely to do well in school than those who cannot afford this type of school (Marxism); • labelling theory – teachers make assumptions about and judge students based on appearance and background and Interactionists like Becker believe this explains educational achievement e.g. through the self-fulfilling prophecy or halo effect; • setting and streaming – teacher expectations are different for students in different sets and this may be the most influential factor in determining educational achievement; • racism and the ethnocentric curriculum – when the dominant culture is seen to be more important than other cultures, giving them little place in the school curriculum, ethnic minority students may feel marginalised and so disengage or ‘play up’; • feminisation of education – boys may not achieve as well as girls in education because education is seen to be a ‘feminine’ world where reading, writing and creativity are valued over actions; • any other reasonable response.
3 (a) Define the term: (i) police targeting [2] (ii) retribution. [2] (b) State two agencies of formal social control. [2] (c) Describe three examples of global crime. [6] (d) Explain three limitations of the Marxist view of crime. [6] (e) Discuss the view that punishment reduces crime. Your answer should include: • at least three developed points with evidence. [8] (f) Evaluate the view that victim surveys are the best way to measure crime. Your answer should include: • at least three arguments for and three arguments against • a conclusion. [14]
40 marks
Mark scheme: 3(a)(i) Define the term police targeting. 2 Award one mark for a partial definition, e.g. stop and search. Award two marks for a clear definition, e.g. when the police focus on a particular group of people, believing that they are more likely to be involved in criminal behaviour than others. 3(a)(ii) Define the term retribution. 2 Award one mark for a partial definition, e.g. taking revenge. Award two marks for a clear definition, e.g. punishments intended as a means of revenge for wrong doing. 3(b) Give two agencies of formal social control. 2 Award one mark for each correct agency (up to a maximum of two). Possible responses: • police; • courts/judiciary/judge/magistrate; • armed forces; • government; • penal system/prison; • any other reasonable response. 3(c) Describe three examples of global crime. 6 Award one mark for each point correctly identified (up to a maximum of three). Award one mark for each point that is developed (up to a maximum of three). Possible responses: • illegal trade by international criminal organisations – drugs and weapon dealing; • people trafficking – the moving and selling of people from low-income countries to wealthier countries for asylum or for work; • sex trafficking – the moving and selling of people, usually females, from low-income countries to wealthier ones for sex work; • selling body organs – the global transportation of human body parts from low-income countries to wealthier ones; • global financial crime – money earned illegally is laundered through legitimate businesses and banks, erasing all traces of the original criminality as the money is moved and ‘cleaned’; • organised global gangs – widespread criminal involvement in organised violent crime from groups such as the Mafia in Italy, the Triads of Hong Kong and the Yakuza of Japan; • animal trafficking – the global trade in protected species of animals and their body parts, e.g. elephant tusks; • green crime – for example deforestation and illegal logging by Western companies in the Amazon rainforest for financial gain and profit; • cybercrime – new technologies and the internet allow digital crime to be committed on a global scale, for example drug trafficking, the dark web, internet scams, hacking, cyberterrorism, cyberbullying etc.; • terrorism – acts of terror typically impact globally, e.g. Neo-Nazi global groups, ISIS global groups etc.; • any other reasonable response. 3(d) Explain three limitations of the Marxist view of crime. 6 Award one mark for each point correctly identified (up to a maximum of three). Award one mark for each point that is developed (up to a maximum of three). Possible responses: • laws – some laws are clearly in everyone’s interest, not just the ruling class, e.g. murder, theft etc., which contradicts the Marxists view that laws act in the interests of the ruling class; • capitalism – Marxists see this system as criminogenic but crime still exists in non-capitalist societies as well as some capitalist societies, such as Switzerland, having very low levels of crime; • social class – Marxists say that it is social class inequalities that cause crime, however this ignores equally important social factors such as age, gender and ethnicity as well as the intersection of these social factors as causes for crime; • reality of crime – the Marxist view portrays the working class as victims of their circumstances but this has been criticised for ignoring the reality of crimes committed by working class offenders and the harm caused by them to victims. Left Realists such as Young discuss the real problem of working class crime; • selective law enforcement – increasingly white-collar and corporate crimes are being prosecuted and lengthy sentences handed out, challenging the Marxist view; • feminism – too much emphasis on social class meaning that issues involving gender are ignored; • any other reasonable response. 3(e) Discuss the view that punishment reduces crime. 8 Use Table A to mark answers to this question. Possible responses: • deterrence – putting people off committing crime and stopping offenders from re-offending is a key aim of punishment; this is done through making them aware of the consequences of crime e.g. loss of freedom, through harsh sentencing etc.; • retribution – making the punishment fit the crime and so executing justice is a key aim for punishment; this makes the offender suffer for what they have done, e.g. ‘an eye for an eye’ and the fear of this kind of punishment will reduce offending and so reduce crime; • incapacitation – preventing the offender from committing more crimes is a key aim of punishment, e.g. imprisonment, banning them from an area, giving them a curfew etc. The death penalty is the most extreme form of incapacitation. All of these measures will reduce crime; • rehabilitation – aims to prevent the offender from committing further crimes by changing their attitudes and behaviour e.g. opportunities for education, training and counselling inside prisons that make employment more likely on release. This will result in long-term reductions in crime; • restorative justice – a form of rehabilitation that involves meetings between the offender and their victim so the offender can be made aware of the impact of their crime on the victim. This has proven successful in reducing reoffending rates as the offender realises the consequences of their actions and so does not reoffend (this reduces crime); • protection of citizens – making society safer and thus protecting citizens from harm is a key aim for any punishment. Increasing surveillance, e.g. CCTV or digital tracking, protects citizens and makes it harder to get away with the crime. This reduces the likelihood of crime occurring in these areas/to these individuals; • informal methods – all informal agencies of social control operate under the understanding that by using negative sanctions bad behaviour will decrease. So, for example, being shunned by the family or peer group due to one’s criminality is an unpleasant thought and is therefore likely to reduce crime from occurring; • any other reasonable response. 3(f) Evaluate the view that victim surveys are the best way to measure 14 crime. Use Table B to mark answers to this question. Possible responses for: • unreported crime – they show crimes that have not been reported to or recorded by the police, so revealing more of the dark figure of crime; • trends – they can reveal more accurate patterns and trends in crime and victimisation than the official crime statistics; • accurate picture – because victims are unlikely to have a vested interest in talking about crime, they are likely to show the most accurate picture of crime available to sociologists; • up to date and regular – victim surveys ask people about the crimes they have been a victim of in the past year thus the picture provided is up to date and regularly revisited, allowing for changes to be seen; • national – some victim surveys are large-scale and carried out at a national level, e.g. the CSEW, this allows for a full picture of crime to be created that is representative of a country and so can be generalised from; • local – some victim surveys are carried out at a local level e.g. Islington Survey, this allows an in-depth picture of crime in a local area to be discovered and local concerns can then be addressed through crime prevention strategies; • misconceptions – another strength of victim surveys is that they can reveal misconceptions about crime, often created through sensationalist media reporting, e.g. Lahore 2017 – this victim survey revealed that despite residents’ fears over crime in their city, they were actually less likely to be victims of crime than people living in other comparable global cities; • feminist – sexual crimes and domestic abuse can be the focus of victim surveys and can reveal the extent of crime against women and children, a notoriously under-reported and recorded area of crime; • any other reasonable response. Possible responses against: • lack of validity – some crimes, e.g. sexual crimes, may still be under- reported in victim surveys due to feelings of shame and embarrassment therefore the picture is still not accurate; • lie/exaggerate – there is no way of checking the validity of what respondents say in a victim survey as it is not based on official records therefore the picture created may be very invalid; • memory – victim surveys rely on what a respondent can remember about the last year and therefore are often inaccurate due to forgetting when a crime occurred/miscalculating/over-estimating etc.; • victimless crimes – victim surveys cannot uncover information about victimless crimes, e.g. drug use, therefore there are gaps in the data; • children – victim surveys often do not include those under the age of 16 in their findings therefore crimes against children (a vulnerable group) are frequently not included which leaves a big gap in the data; 3(f) • awareness of crime – not everyone is aware that they have been a victim of crime and therefore they will not report this crime in their responses, e.g. victims of fraud, hacking, identity theft etc. are often unaware that they have been a victim; • local/feminist surveys – these often use a small sample in a local area and therefore cannot claim to be as representative as the official crime statistics. This means they cannot be generalised from; • any other reasonable response.
3 (a) Define the term: (i) discrimination [2] (ii) probation. [2] (b) State two patterns of victimisation. [2] (c) Describe three ways informal agencies of social control can prevent crime. [6] (d) Explain three limitations of feminist explanations for crime. [6] (e) Discuss the view that ethnicity is an important factor in explaining why individuals commit crime. Your answer should include: • at least three developed points with evidence. [8] (f) Evaluate the view that rehabilitation is the most effective way to deal with crime. Your answer should include: • at least three arguments for and three arguments against • a conclusion. [14]
40 marks
Mark scheme: 3(a)(i) Define the term discrimination. 2 Award one mark for a partial definition, e.g. being unfair. Award two marks for a clear definition, e.g. treating a person or group of people differently to other people, often based on prejudice/stereotypes. Accept any other reasonable response. 3(a)(ii) Define the term probation. 2 Award one mark for a partial definition, e.g. being supervised. Award two marks for a clear definition, e.g. serving a sentence, or part of it, in the community (not in prison) under supervision. Accept any other reasonable response. 3(b) State two patterns of victimisation. 2 Award one mark for each correct example (up to a maximum of two). Possible responses: • children – more likely to be victims of crime due to their low power and status, e.g. vulnerable to neglect and abuse within the family; • teenagers – more likely to be victims of violent crime as they are more likely to be in public places where crimes occur; • older people – vulnerable to becoming victims of cybercrimes due to the digital divide; • working class – often victims of burglary and theft because they are unable to afford resources to protect themselves from such crimes; • women – most likely to be the victims of domestic and sexual crimes (the most unreported crimes); • young men – most likely to be the victims of violent and gang related offences; • minority groups – those groups most at risk in a society of prejudice and discrimination are also most likely to be the victims of crime; • hate crime – minority groups are most likely to be the victim of hate crime, e.g. racism, homophobia; • any other reasonable response. 3(c) Describe three ways informal agencies of social control can prevent 6 crime. Award one mark for each point correctly identified (up to a maximum of three). Award one mark for each point that is developed (up to a maximum of three). Possible responses: • socialisation – all informal agencies socialise us into the correct, non- criminal, values of society and socially acceptable behaviour. We internalise these norms and self-regulate our behaviour, so preventing crime; • personal relationships – relationships are often based on personal networks and contacts and thus letting someone down and disappointing them is often a strong deterrent to committing crime; • family – positive and negative sanctions are used in order to establish acceptable and non-acceptable behaviour whereby parents act as role models for their children, thus preventing crime; • religion – they have rules about behaviour for their followers and in some countries these religious rules can even become part of the law. Followers are deterred from crime through the fear of living in sin or going to hell; • education – formal sanctions co-exist with the hidden curriculum to ensure students follow the rules and become used to social conformity rather than deviance, thus preventing crime; • media – reporting about criminal behaviour and court cases informs people about which behaviours will be punished. It reinforces shared feelings about what behaviour is right and wrong and so prevents crime; • peer group – these have powerful ways of exercising informal social control in order to prevent crime, e.g. peer pressure, fear of ostracism/social exclusion and negative comments; • workplace – all workplaces have rules e.g. timekeeping, uniform and work rate and if these are not followed then the individual will lose their job, which they do not want. The workplace therefore inculcates positive behaviour and so prevents crime; • any other reasonable response. 3(d) Explain three limitations of feminist explanations for crime. 6 Award one mark for each point correctly identified (up to a maximum of three). Award one mark for each point that is developed (up to a maximum of three). Possible responses: • justice – the criminal justice system does not always operate in a patriarchal way, there are many laws that protect women and crimes against women are regularly investigated and punished today; • emphasis on gender – feminist explanations for crime focus too much on the gender issue and therefore ignore other relevant social factors such as ethnicity, age and social class; • personnel – we do now have senior officials in the criminal justice system who are women, e.g. judges, police officers, barristers etc – they represent women and ensure justice is served in a fair manner; • rise of female crime and criminals – female criminality and gang membership is on the increase, something that feminist explanations for crime and deviance do not deal with – women are not just victims of crime, they are the perpetrators too; • chivalry factor – Pollak – sometimes females are treated more leniently than males as the chivalry thesis indicates. Feminists ignore this aspect of crime and deviance whereby females benefit; • changing definitions of masculinity and femininity – mean that many feminist critiques of older explanations for crime are no longer valid in contemporary societies, feminism has not adapted to the changing roles, norms and values in the world; • domestic and sexual crime – feminists fail to take account of new approaches to such crimes – better trained law enforcement officers, specialist teams for support and a higher media profile to encourage the reporting of such crimes, e.g. #metoo; • socialisation and social control – women are no longer confined to the domestic sphere and do now have the means and opportunities to commit crime, e.g. by working in white-collar jobs/being the breadwinner; • changing culture – misogyny and patriarchy are now widely recognised as being unacceptable in society and therefore formal agencies are dealing with such cases and incidents severely now; • any other reasonable response. 3(e) Discuss the view that ethnicity is an important factor in explaining why 8 individuals commit crime. Use Table A to mark answers to this question. Possible responses: • institutional racism – the police, courts and the penal system work in ways that disadvantage ethnic minorities and do not treat them in the same way as the ethnic majority, e.g. the Stephen Lawrence case in the UK, BLM protests against police brutality in the USA – resistance to racism is often a reason for crime; • prejudice and discrimination – an ethnic minority individual may be unable to achieve good qualifications at school or to find a good job that they are qualified for because of discrimination. This leads to resentment and disillusionment as well as material deprivation which may lead to crime; • police targeting – if the police stop and search members of ethnic minorities more than other ethnic groups then more crime will inevitably be uncovered in these ethnic groups. Such unfair targeting may also lead to mistrust and dislike of the police and then to deviancy amplification; • deprivation and marginalisation – when opportunities to achieve success in society are blocked, ethnic minorities may turn to crime as a response to their deprivation, be this for necessities (material) or to have the things that others in society have (relative); • stereotyping – racist stereotypes in society may lead to some ethnic minorities being unfairly labelled as criminals which can then lead to a self-fulfilling prophecy. Media representations and the creation of moral panics and folk devils are thought to be central to this, e.g. Hall’s study of black muggers; • gang culture – young people from ethnic minorities are more likely to grow up in the inner-cities where gangs are commonplace. As a result, they are more likely to join a gang and become involved in criminal behaviour and violence, e.g. illegitimate opportunity structures; • status frustration – young ethnic minorities are likely to experience status frustration (Cohen) because for them many of the usual routes to achieving status are blocked and thus crime and/or gang membership is often seen as the only route to improving one’s status; • any other reasonable response. 3(f) Evaluate the view that rehabilitation is the most effective way to deal 14 with crime. Use Table B to mark answers to this question. Possible responses for: • prison training – education and training can be offered within prisons to upskill offenders and therefore provide them with ways of earning money through employment when they are released, thus reducing the likelihood of further offending; • cause of offending – sometimes rehabilitation addresses the causes of the offending and treats it, e.g. addiction programmes or anger management courses. These aim to address the root causes of offending and change the offender accordingly so that they do not commit further crime; • restorative justice – meetings between the offender and the victim so that the offender can hear about the impact of their crime on the victim. This has proved successful to reduce reoffending particularly in minor crimes as the offender is made to face up to the consequences of their actions and so becomes rehabilitated; • guidance and support – programmes of rehabilitation are now commonly used to run alongside other punishments (in prison or the community). This gives offenders a personalised programme of support over a long period of time to work closely with them to address their individual needs and so prevent further offending, e.g. help to find living accommodation, help with interview skills etc; • probation – a period of time when an offender is monitored in the community. The offender attends regular meetings with a probation officer, building up relationships and slowly working on rehabilitating the offender so they are safe to live and function within the community; • victims – trained police officers and healthcare specialists now form part of the programme of support for victims of crime, helping them to deal with its impact through counselling, targeted support and empathy; • other reasonable response. 3(f) Possible responses against: • prison – incapacitating the offender keeps the public safe and ensures further crime cannot be committed whilst the criminal is held in custody. Losing one’s liberty is the best way to deal with crime; • too soft on crime – the New Right and Right Realists would argue that rehabilitation is too soft in its approach to crime and that the only way we can successfully deal with it is with harsher sentencing and methods of social control; • capital punishment – the death penalty is the best way to deal with serious crime as it guarantees that the offender cannot commit further crimes. Some crimes are so heinous and terrible that this is thought to be the only way to deal with the issue fairly and effectively, bringing justice to the victim’s family; • corporal punishment – physical punishment intended to cause pain. This is a short, sharp shock aimed at teaching the offender a lesson and so quickly and cheaply dealing with the problem of crime, e.g. flogging or whipping an offender; • community sentencing – doing compulsory, unpaid work in the community, often to match the nature of the crime committed, is a better way to deal with crime as not only does the offender have to put right their wrong but also there are benefits for the community who have been affected by the offending, e.g. cleaner streets, new facilities; • vigilante groups – groups of citizens sometimes decide to punish offenders themselves, often using social media to spread the news. This is often used when authorities aren’t seen to be doing enough. This scares other offenders into not offending as well as removing the criminal from the streets; • financial penalties – many white-collar or corporate crimes would not be appropriate for rehabilitative sentencing as there is no issue to ‘fix’. A fine is therefore imposed instead as the punishment, e.g. for crimes such as fraud, money laundering; • exile and ostracism – the offender is required to leave their home and community and start a new life elsewhere. Modern societies can impose injunction or restraining orders with the same aims and effects. This can be better than rehabilitation because the problem is removed therefore preventing further offending; • deterrence – putting others off committing crime is one of the aims of punishment and this may not be achieved through rehabilitative punishments. Consequences need to be harsher for this aim to be met, e.g. long prison sentences, capital punishment; • retribution – making the punishment fit the crime – it may be that the aim of punishment is not to ‘fix’ the offender but to make the offender suffer for what they have done (often serious crimes) and therefore harsh punishments are required which would not be rehabilitative; • any other reasonable response.
3 (a) Define the term: (i) unrecorded crime [2] (ii) expressive crime. [2] (b) State two aims of punishment. [2] (c) Describe three features of strain theory. [6] (d) Explain three reasons why crimes are not always reported to the police. [6] (e) Discuss the view that moral panics lead to crime. Your answer should include: • at least three developed points with evidence. [8] (f) Evaluate the view that policing strategies are effective at preventing crime. Your answer should include: • at least three arguments for and three arguments against • a conclusion. [14]
40 marks
Mark scheme: 3(a)(i) Define the term unrecorded crime. 2 Award one mark for a partial definition, e.g. crimes not known about/crimes not reported to the police; Award two marks for a clear definition, e.g. crimes reported to the police but not officially noted by them OR crimes not featured in the official crime statistics. Accept any other reasonable response. 3(a)(ii) Define the term expressive crime. 2 Award one mark for a partial definition, e.g. an example such as vandalism; Award two marks for a clear definition, e.g. offences involving emotions (e.g. anger, frustration, enjoyment) which are usually unplanned. Accept any other reasonable response. 3(b) State two aims of punishment. 2 Award one mark for each correct example (up to a maximum of two). Possible responses: • protection of citizens; • deterrence; • rehabilitation; • safety of the public; • prevention of crime; • retribution; • incapacitation; • any other reasonable response. 3(c) Describe three features of strain theory. 6 Award one mark for each point correctly identified (up to a maximum of three). Award one mark for each point that is developed (up to a maximum of three). Possible responses: • media pressure – the media shows material success as the norm and therefore puts pressure on individuals to achieve this – if they can’t do so legitimately then they may turn to crime; • consumer society – the 1930’s American Dream requires us to ‘show off’ our success through the products and brands we buy – if we can’t afford to do this then we may turn to crime (relative deprivation idea); • hard work and study – this is at the core of the American Dream but even when we do this we will not all achieve material success as not everyone is equally able to achieve it (myth of meritocracy), therefore some individuals will turn to crime; • modes of adaptation – Merton believed the mismatch between the goals of the American Dream and the legal means of obtaining them causes deviant behaviour. There may be five possible responses to the situation: conformity, innovation, ritualism, retreatism or rebellion; • full explanation – strain theory can be used to explain both crime and deviance as well as both materially motivated and more expressive crimes such as drug-taking; • innovators – they find new, non-legal, ways to achieve society’s goals of material success through deviant means e.g. drug dealing, fraud, theft etc; • retreatists – as they realise they cannot achieve the material success they desire, they retreat from society and commit criminal and deviant behaviour in the process e.g. drug addicts, alcoholics, prostitutes etc; • rebels – when they can’t achieve the societal goal of material success they develop alternative goals instead to strive for – so making them deviant e.g. cults, protests, terrorists, environmental warriors etc; • any other reasonable response. 3(d) Explain three reasons why crimes are not always reported to the police. 6 Award one mark for each point correctly identified (up to a maximum of three). Award one mark for each point that is developed (up to a maximum of three). Possible responses: • trivial crimes – petty crimes are often not reported to the police as they are perceived as unimportant and people do not believe the police can do anything to help; • only reported if it benefits the person – for example, if a stolen item is insured the victim is likely to report the theft but if it is not then they are less likely to report it as they know it is unlikely they will get it back; • private matters – some crimes are seen as private matters to be dealt with by a family or community and the police should not be involved e.g. domestic abuse, honour killings; • embarrassment – some victims are too embarrassed to report a crime as they are fearful about future shame or stigma in their community e.g. sexual offences; • don’t want to get involved – witnesses sometimes do not report a crime because they do not want to have to get involved and give statements/go to court etc; • fear of reprisals – victims and witnesses may be concerned about their safety if they report a crime e.g. they may be threatened/harmed by the criminal/gang; • distrust of the police – some communities distrust the police and may be reluctant to have any contact with them based on prior experiences/media representations e.g. some ethnic minorities, prostitutes etc; • difficulties of access – in some communities reporting a crime to the police is difficult to do e.g. lack of internet, living a long way from the police station and therefore they don‘t report it for practical reasons; • relationship to offender – some victims may not report a crime because they do not want to get the criminal into trouble or see him/her punished e.g. a family member, partner or friend; • any other reasonable response. 3(e) Discuss the view that moral panics lead to crime. 8 Use Table A to mark answers to this question. Possible responses: • media labelling – a stereotype is created in the media of a group of people that are said to be committing crime. They negatively label them as ‘criminals’, ‘trouble’ etc and so the law enforcement agencies over- react to their, often, petty deviance which can then lead to further crime being committed; • exaggeration – the behaviour of the group in question is reported to be worse than it is, using exaggerated and sensationalist language and, e.g. a small fight is portrayed as a large-scale riot. This can lead to crime through imitation/copycat; • prediction – the media often predict that the crime and deviance they report on will happen again. This acts as a self-fulfilling prophecy which leads to crime; • symbolisation – the media shows how folk devils can be recognised, e.g. by their appearance or clothing. This makes them a target for the public and the police which may lead to increased rates of stop and search that will frustrate and anger the recipient, so leading to further crime being committed through resistance; • Cohen’s mods and rockers study – the clashes between the two groups were, in reality, fairly minor but the media reported them as a major cause for concern for the public and the authorities which led to calls for tougher policing. This resulted in more young people being arrested as well as more laws being introduced to criminalise young people; • folk devils – they are represented by the media in a moral panic as being totally different to the rest of the ‘normal’ population. It therefore becomes easy for the public to become scared of them and demand action and harsher policing. Policies such as ‘three strikes’ and ‘zero tolerance’ means behaviour by the ‘bad’ people is not tolerated and they become stigmatised as criminal. This can become a master status and make it likely that they become part of a deviant subculture, so increasing levels of crime; • deviancy amplification – the media coverage (as in Cohen’s case) encouraged some young people to go to the places where the media predicted that fights and violence would take place. They became involved in the fights themselves whereas without the moral panic being created they would not have been involved in crime. The media response leads to more crime; • any other reasonable response. 3(f) Evaluate the view that policing strategies are effective at preventing 14 crime. Use Table B to mark answers to this question. Possible responses for: • targeting and stop and search – by focusing on a particular area or group of people the police can prevent crime through high arrest rates, their visible presence and the idea of deterrence; • surveillance – new technologies have led to surveillance becoming widespread. It can focus on individuals suspected of crimes and so prevent them offending or it can be more general in terms of keeping everybody under surveillance e.g. CCTV, drones, tracking etc and be preventative in this way; • undercover officers – in some countries the police monitor protest groups, terrorist groups or criminal gangs by undercover police officers joining these groups under false identities and becoming deeply involved in their activities – this infiltration can thus prevent crimes occurring; • zero tolerance policing – the ‘broken windows’ theory saw the police acting against minor acts of crime and deviance to give the message to criminals that the law would always be enforced and that more serious crime would not be tolerated. This was seen to be successful as in cities where this approach was taken the crime rate fell i.e. the police strategy prevented crime e.g. New York City in the 1990’s; • community policing – the police are a visible presence, patrolling the streets and talking to people, building up good community relationships. This builds trust in the police and makes the public more likely to report crimes and to share information that can catch criminals – so preventing crime; • military policing – the police are armed, use force and weaponry to stop and/or prevent crime. They are often sent out to events or areas e.g. riots, protests etc; • police cautions and fines – the police are able to issue these to deviants and criminals to exercise their authority and to prevent crime through warnings and financial penalties; • in some countries the police run prisons – police may help to rehabilitate criminals/lock them up as punishment for their crimes; • any other reasonable response. 3(f) Possible responses against: • crime rates remain high indicating that the police strategies are not particularly effective at preventing crime but perhaps are more of a measure of social control; • Marxism – the police are part of the repressive state apparatus and are used by the ruling class to protect themselves from the working class and to maintain their privileged position in society – they do not prevent crime, they simply mask white-collar crime and criminalise the working class; • feminism – the police do not prevent crime as they are part of the patriarchal society that marginalises the victimisation of women and sometimes do not take women’s allegations of wrongdoings seriously enough e.g. high rates of domestic violence, high rates of sexual offences etc; • military style policing – policing works best when it has the support of the community and this style of policing can seem like an unwanted invasion which can turn people against the police and so reduce their effectiveness; • resistance – some communities and local groups have lost trust in the police and therefore they are not effective at preventing crime in such areas. Ethnic minority communities are a good example e.g. BLM protests, inner-city riots, high rates of stop and search, police targeting etc; • global crimes – different countries have different laws and disagree on how crimes should be dealt with and investigated; with many crimes now happening on a global rather than a national/local level this makes policing less effective at preventing crime; • cybercrimes – the police are not typically cyber experts and therefore the hackers and the fraudsters can successfully avoid detection and arrest illustrating that the police are not effective at preventing such crimes; • harsh punishment – some believe that if we want to prevent crime we need to move away from agencies of formal social control and look at harsh sentencing/punishment instead e.g. death penalty, incarceration; • informal agencies of social control – some believe that the best way to prevent crime is through socialisation and informal social control, carried out by the family, education, peer groups, religion and the media; • any other reasonable response.
3 (a) Define the term: (i) stereotyping [2] (ii) property crime. [2] (b) State two types of crime with high rates of victimisation for elderly people. [2] (c) Explain three reasons why some youths join gangs. [6] (d) Explain three feminist views of crime. [6] (e) Discuss the limitations of self-report studies for measuring crime. Your answer should include: • at least three developed points with evidence. [8] (f) Evaluate the view that status frustration is the best explanation for crime. Your answer should include: • at least three arguments for and three arguments against • a conclusion. [14]
40 marks
Mark scheme: 3(a)(i) 2 Define the term stereotyping. Award one mark for a partial definition, e.g. an example such as, teenage delinquents. Award two marks for a clear definition, e.g. a widely held idea about a particular group of people, based on characteristics such as their ethnicity, gender, age etc. These can be oversimplified, often negative and not always true. Accept any other reasonable response. 3(a)(ii) 2 Define the term property crime. Award one mark for a partial definition, e.g. stealing something/theft. Award two marks for a clear definition, e.g. theft of or intentional damage to things/places owned by an individual, group or organisation. Accept any other reasonable response. 3(b) 2 State two types of crime with high rates of victimisation for elderly people. Award one mark for each correct example (up to a maximum of two). Possible responses: • online fraud; • cybercrimes; • identity theft; • theft; • elderly abuse; • financial abuse; • neglect; • any other reasonable response. 3(c) 6 Explain three reasons why some youths join gangs. Award one mark for each point correctly identified (up to a maximum of three). Award one mark for each point that is developed (up to a maximum of three). Possible responses: • poverty – Marxism – for those youths that do not have the material goods that society deems as representing success, they may turn to gangs to make this money. They are promised big rewards for little effort and soon become part of organised crime, drug-dealing and trafficking; • community – Cloward and Ohlin – illegitimate opportunity structure – in poorer areas there often exists illegitimate opportunities to be successful alongside the legitimate ones. Successful criminal role models may tempt young people into a life of gang crime as it is normalised within the area; • peer group – peer pressure is intense for young people and the need to fit in becomes so important that some youths may find themselves involved in gang activities and loyalties; • status frustration – Cohen – all young males want status and if they can’t get it legitimately then they may turn to criminal means instead and the gang and the opportunities for success it presents is one such option; • thrills and excitement – postmodernism – youths join gangs because of boredom; gangs are represented as glamourous and fun and the ‘edgework’ they offer seems exciting – Katz and Lyng; • strain theory – Merton – in some societies opportunities for young people are limited, there may be few jobs so those youths who want money and material possessions may turn to a criminal gang life; • culture of masculinity – boys are still expected to be hegemonic males and the values associated with this involve violence, aggression, risk taking behaviour – all the things that a gang can offer them; • socialisation and social control – if a young person is brought up by criminal parents or has older siblings who are involved in crime, they are more likely to be delinquent and join a gang themselves as they are socialised from an early age with deviant values where criminal behaviour is normal and even expected; • consumer society – status is often associated in Western societies with possessions and so there is pressure on young people to acquire status symbols and to consume continuously – this is expensive, however, and so gangs may be a viable temptation to provide the necessary finances; • feminism – girl gangs and female gang members are on the increase and this may be because girls are now having more equal opportunities in life and are rejecting the norms and values associated with passive femininity, e.g. ladette culture, Jackson; • racism/discrimination – ethnic minority involvement in gangs can be explained through the prejudice that permeates many societies and does not give ethnic minority youth the same chances for success as the ethnic majority – gang life can thus be a way of resisting the socially excluding, racist host country; • any other reasonable response. 3(d) Explain three feminist views of crime. 6 Award one mark for each point correctly identified (up to a maximum of three). Award one mark for each point that is developed (up to a maximum of three). Possible responses: • patriarchy – crime happens within a patriarchal society where men expect to be in positions of power over women in all aspects of life and this then leads to crime e.g. sexual assault, domestic violence; • the criminal justice system is male dominated – males dominate the top of the hierarchy, allowing sometimes sexist and misogynistic attitudes to be seen as normal, e.g. rape victims feeling they are being put on trial in the courtroom; • masculinity and femininity – the pressures placed on individuals by society to conform to the expected gender roles means that males are more likely to engage in criminal behaviour than women, e.g. aggression and violence, ‘doing masculinity’ (Messerschmidt); • women as victims of crime – feminists think female victimisation needs to be taken more seriously by the formal agents of social control, e.g. specialist officers to deal with sexual crimes, support for women trapped as victims of domestic violence, an end to the intimate and unnecessary questioning of rape victims in the courtroom about their clothing, make- up and previous sexual history etc; • dark figure of crime – feminists believe that there is a huge hidden figure of crimes against women that are not shown in the official crime statistics. These are typically domestic and sexual crimes; • misogyny – the hatred of women – women are seen as inferior to or as a threat to men. Misogynists assert their dominance over women in many ways and some of these will be criminal, e.g. sexual insults, harassment, assaults and rape. Feminists want these acts to be categorised and dealt with as hate crimes; • socialisation – boys and girls are socialised into different gender roles, e.g. Oakley. The masculine roles that boys learn increase their chances of being involved in crime and deviance compared with the feminine roles that girls are socialised into; • social control – there is greater control over women than men in most societies and women spend a lot of their time at home, in contrast, males have greater freedom outside the home and so have more opportunities to commit crime (Heidensohn); • culture of masculinity – hegemonic masculinity remains the dominant form of masculinity in society and this involves men being in control, physical strength, use of violence, competitive nature. This is what is expected of men and is how they prove their masculinity – crime is very closely aligned to this; • chivalry thesis – Pollack – the idea that women are less likely to be charged and convicted of crime than men because they are treated with more leniency by the police and the courts. Women are traditionally viewed as vulnerable and delicate, not fearful criminals and therefore they are underrepresented in the crime statistics; 3(d) • double deviance – when a woman does not conform to the expected roles of being female and commits crime then she can be severely punished and vilified for her behaviour, e.g. child killers, infanticide; • any other reasonable response. 3(e) Discuss the limitations of self-report studies for measuring crime. 8 Use Table A to mark answers to this question. Possible responses: • validity – there are concerns about the accuracy of the responses gathered. Respondents may exaggerate to impress their peers or under- report crimes committed in order to create a good impression with the researcher; • anonymity – despite assurances that answers given will remain confidential and that no names are needed, many people who have committed an offence may not admit to it, especially if they were never charged by the police. There is always that wariness; • trivial offences – most self-report studies ask about relatively trivial and petty offences or about deviant acts rather than criminal. This limits their usefulness in giving a realistic overview of crime; • ethical issues – respondents are unlikely to give honest answers about serious crimes and if they did do this then ethical issues would be raised for the researcher. Should the researcher report them despite the promise of anonymity?; • sample – self-report studies are typically carried out with young people as it is recognised that adults have a lot to lose and so are very unlikely to answer honestly. The sample size is often small. This means the results are not representative and cannot be generalised from; • individual responses – self-report studies are carried out on individuals and so are not appropriate to investigate crimes such as state, corporate and globally organised; • crimes covered – as well as trivial offences dominating self-report studies, they also rarely ask about crimes associated with adults and therefore present a skewed set of results, e.g. white-collar crimes are rarely asked about. This produces an incomplete picture of crime; • any other reasonable response. 3(f) Evaluate the view that status frustration is the best explanation for 14 crime. Use Table B to mark answers to this question. Possible responses for: • age – Cohen – all young males want respect from their peers. Working class boys, failing at school, feel a lack of status in education and so look for it elsewhere. They may gain respect from their peers by adopting deviant values and committing crime, e.g. taking drugs, vandalism, petty theft etc; • ethnicity – many of the usual ways to gain status in society are blocked for some ethnic minority groups meaning they may be more likely to suffer from status frustration than others. Crime or gang membership may thus be seen as the only ways in which they can gain status; • social class – Cohen argued that status frustration was a working-class issue and derived from educational inequalities. These inequalities caused deviance because working class boys were unable to gain status from their peer group in any other way, hence they turned to crime; • gender – the statistics show that boys commit a lot more crime than girls. Having status in the peer group is essential for boys who want to avoid being labelled as weak or feminine and so turn to crime as a way to secure the respect and status they crave from their peers e.g. Willis ‘the lads’; • strain theory – status frustration is best at explaining crime as it goes further than strain theory to look at why crime is committed in groups and why non utilitarian crime is committed; • any other reasonable response. Possible responses against: • police targeting/stop and search – high rates of deviance for young working-class males may be explained by the fact that the police target certain social groups more than others and so are more likely to discover crime as well as to provoke more crime happening (deviancy amplification) through perceived unfairness in the targeting; • socialisation and social control – criminal behaviour may be learnt from others meaning individuals brought up by criminal parents or with criminal siblings or in areas where crime is a normal part of life, are more likely to turn to crime themselves; • racism, prejudice and discrimination – ethnic minority individuals may commit crime as a response to their experiences of inequality in society (education, criminal justice system. workplace etc). They will therefore feel socially excluded from society and thus be more likely to commit crimes as a form of resistance; • material and relative deprivation – young/working class/ethnic minorities are more likely to be economically deprived than other social groups and this may be the reason for their high rates of crime. This will be exacerbated by the pressures to consume found in advertising that cause the feeling of having less than others around them – consumer society; • culture of masculinity – hegemonic masculinity remains the dominant form of masculinity and the pressure to conform to this is difficult for young males. Masculine values of aggression, violence, lack of emotion and physical strength are very similar to criminal values; 3(f) • power inequalities – high crime rates are often associated with individuals having a lack of power in society which can result in the criminalisation of some people, e.g. working class, ethnic minorities, the young, women (domestic and sexual crimes); • inadequate socialisation – Murray, the New Right – crime can be explained by some individuals not being properly socialised by their parents. Murray associates this with the underclass and blames the decline in marriage and the rise in single parent families for the issues; • any other reasonable response.