5.3· 21 questions · 510 marks · 612 min · 2020–2025· Structured questions
Every Cambridge IGCSE Economics (9-1) Paper 2 question on population, laid out as 7 A4 pages with the mark scheme below. Nothing is left out. Free to read, no account.
![Question 1: (a) Calculate Vietnam’s GDP per head in 2017. [1] (b) Identify two rewards to factors of production. [2] (c) Explain what happened to Vietn…](https://img.pastlit.com/crops/25a30bfd-437a-4114-9add-fd1b8fde8310/q1.webp)

1 / 7
![Question 5: (a) Calculate the value of Nigeria’s exports of goods in 2017. [1] (b) Identify two examples of capital goods. [2] (c) Explain whether Nige…](https://img.pastlit.com/crops/ed31ca2a-80d0-40ae-b11f-ddaab7cd4d26/q1.webp)
2 / 7![Question 7: (a) Calculate Chile’s agricultural output in 2017. [1] (b) Identify two disadvantages of a country specialising. [2] (c) Explain one reason…](https://img.pastlit.com/crops/260d33a4-ab54-4d94-8af6-551286d71820/q1.webp)

3 / 7![Question 10: (a) Calculate the number of births in Cyprus in 2019. [1] (b) Identify two indicators of living standards. [2] (c) State why the global mar…](https://img.pastlit.com/crops/ee721f9e-13aa-489b-97d1-8d2a02fbfef0/q1.webp)
![Question 11: (a) Calculate Bhutan’s GDP in 2018. [1] (b) Identify two indicators that are in both the World Happiness Index and the Human Development In…](https://img.pastlit.com/crops/1b17fcbb-480d-4e69-9322-6004fb979105/q1.webp)
4 / 7![Question 13: (a) Calculate how many dollars 6400 Nigerian naira would have bought in 2019. [1] (b) Identify two ways a bank could increase demand for it…](https://img.pastlit.com/crops/a5614d74-144c-4d2f-bdd5-0e16b74f222b/q1.webp)

5 / 7

6 / 7

7 / 7Answers below. Sit the paper first if you are practising.
Pastlit
Economics (9-1) 0987 · Population — Paper 2
IGCSE · topical answer key — answer key (teacher use)
Question
Answer
Marks
30
20
20
20
30
20
30
20
20
30
30
20
30
20
30
20
20
30
20
20
30| Question | Answer | Marks | From |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | see sheet | 30 | 0987/21 May/June 2020 |
| 2 | see sheet | 20 | 0987/21 May/June 2020 |
| 3 | see sheet | 20 | 0987/22 May/June 2020 |
| 4 | see sheet | 20 | 0987/22 Oct/Nov 2020 |
| 5 | see sheet | 30 | 0987/21 May/June 2021 |
| 6 | see sheet | 20 | 0987/21 May/June 2021 |
| 7 | see sheet | 30 | 0987/22 May/June 2021 |
| 8 | see sheet | 20 | 0987/22 May/June 2021 |
| 9 | see sheet | 20 | 0987/22 Oct/Nov 2021 |
| 10 | see sheet | 30 | 0987/21 May/June 2022 |
| 11 | see sheet | 30 | 0987/22 May/June 2022 |
| 12 | see sheet | 20 | 0987/22 May/June 2022 |
| 13 | see sheet | 30 | 0987/22 Oct/Nov 2022 |
| 14 | see sheet | 20 | 0987/21 May/June 2023 |
| 15 | see sheet | 30 | 0987/22 May/June 2023 |
| 16 | see sheet | 20 | 0987/22 Oct/Nov 2023 |
| 17 | see sheet | 20 | 0987/21 May/June 2024 |
| 18 | see sheet | 30 | 0987/22 Oct/Nov 2024 |
| 19 | see sheet | 20 | 0987/21 May/June 2025 |
| 20 | see sheet | 20 | 0987/21 May/June 2025 |
| 21 | see sheet | 30 | 0987/22 Oct/Nov 2025 |
1 (a) Calculate Vietnam’s GDP per head in 2017. [1] (b) Identify two rewards to factors of production. [2] (c) Explain what happened to Vietnam’s foreign exchange rate between 2010 and 2017. [2] (d) Explain two benefits an economy may gain from having a young labour force. [4] (e) Analyse why Vietnam’s budget deficit may decline in the future. [4] (f) Analyse the relationship between government spending on education and the percentage of the labour force employed in the tertiary sector. [5] (g) Discuss whether or not an increase in competition is likely to benefit Vietnamese consumers. [6] (h) Discuss whether or not the increase in borrowing is likely to have caused inflation in Vietnam in 2017. [6]
30 marks
Mark scheme: Question Answer Marks 1(a) Calculate Vietnam’s GDP per head in 2017. 1 $6900 (1). 1(b) Identify two rewards to factors of production. 2 Wages (1) profits (1). 1(c) Explain what happened to Vietnam’s foreign exchange rate between 2 2010 and 2017. Logical explanation which might include: It fell/depreciated (1) more dong had to be given to buy one dollar (1). 1(d) Explain two benefits an economy may gain from having a young 4 labour force. Logical explanation which might include: May be more flexible (1) switch from doing different tasks (1). May be more mobile (1) able to switch from one job to another or from one place to another place (1). May be more up to date with advances in technology (1) more productive/able to use advanced technology (1). 1(e) Analyse why Vietnam’s budget deficit may decline in the future. 4 Coherent analysis which might include: High economic growth will raise incomes/wages rising (1) higher profits (1) more revenue from direct taxes (1) higher incomes is likely to result in more spending (1) more revenue from indirect taxes (1). Tax rates may be increased (1) reducing the gap between tax revenue and government spending (1). Deregulation / privatisation may increase profits (1) resulting in higher revenue from direct taxes /corporation tax (1). 1(f) Analyse the relationship between government spending on education 5 and the percentage of the labour force employed in the tertiary sector. Coherent analysis which might include: Generally the countries with the highest % spending on education have the highest percentage employed in the tertiary sector and vice versa (1) up to two examples e.g. Norway has the highest % spending and the highest % employed in the tertiary sector, Bangladesh has the lowest % spending and the lowest % employed in the tertiary sector (2) the main exception is Vietnam – second highest % spending but lowest % employed in the tertiary sector (1) there may be a time lag in this case (1). It is the expected relationship as some tertiary jobs require high skills (1) countries that can afford to devote a high percentage of resources to education may have achieved a relatively high level of development (1) a higher percent spent will create jobs in education (1). 1(g) Discuss whether or not an increase in competition is likely to benefit 6 Vietnamese consumers. Apply this example to all questions with the command word DISCUSS (1g, 1h, 2d, 3d, 4d and 5d) Each point may be credited only once, on either side of an argument, but separate development as to how/why the outcome may differ is rewarded. Generic example mark Tax revenue may decrease… 1 ...because of reason e.g. incomes may be lower. 1 Tax revenue may increase because incomes may be higher i.e. 0 reverse of a previous argument. Tax revenue may increase because of a different reason i.e. not the reverse of a previous argument e.g. government spending on 1 subsidies may stimulate the economy more than spending on education. Award up to 4 marks for logical reasons why it might, which may include: • prices may be reduced to attract more consumers (1) making them more affordable to consumers (1) • choice will be increased in terms of sellers (1) and possibly in terms of a greater range of products (1) • quality may rise (1) with pressure being put on producers to produce good products to attract consumers (1) • producers may respond more fully to changes in consumer demand (1) Award up to 4 marks for logical reasons why it might not, which may include: • firms may be smaller (1), less able to take advantage of economies of scale (1), so prices may be higher (1) • firms may have less profit (1) and so spend less improving the quality of the product (1) • some firms may be MNCs (1), less concerned about causing external costs (1) 1(h) Discuss whether or not the increase in borrowing is likely to have 6 caused inflation in Vietnam in 2017. Award up to 4 marks for logical reasons why it might, which may include: • higher consumer demand (1) and investment (1) will increase total (aggregate) demand (1) • higher total demand may cause demand-pull inflation/cause producers to raise prices (1) • government spending may rise, further adding to total (aggregate) demand (1) • the economy has very low unemployment/full employment (1) making it difficult for supply to respond to higher demand (1) • tax rates may rise (1) which may increase costs of production (1) causing cost-push inflation (1) Award up to 4 marks for logical reasons why it might not, which may include: • higher investment may reduce costs of production (1) lowering cost- push inflation (1) • higher consumer spending may enable firms to grow (1) and take greater advantage of economies of scale (1) • increased education (1) may raise labour productivity (1), reduce costs of production (1) and lower cost-push inflation (1) • privatised firms may be more efficient (1) • more competition may reduce price rises (1)
2 Japan has a low immigration rate and a declining population. In recent years, it has experienced deflation and a rise in child poverty. By 2017, one in six Japanese children lived in a household with less than half of the average household income. Japan operates a national minimum wage which increased every year between 2010 and 2017. This may have affected the level of poverty in the country. (a) State two benefits a country may gain from immigration. [2] (b) Explain two consequences of deflation. [4] (c) Analyse why children from low-income families may have low incomes as adults. [6] (d) Discuss whether or not a national minimum wage will reduce poverty. [8]
20 marks
Mark scheme: 2(a) State two benefits a country may gain from immigration. 2 One mark each for two from: larger labour force, reduced dependency rate, higher demand, higher tax revenue, more skilled workers, greater utilisation of resources. 2(b) Explain two consequences of deflation. 4 Logical explanation which might include: Output may fall (1) if due to lower demand firms will cut back production (1). Unemployment may rise (1) fewer workers will be needed to produce fewer goods and services (1). Economic growth may decline / a recession may occur (1) due to lower total (aggregate) demand (1). Output may rise (1) if due to lower costs of production / advances in technology (1). Exports may increase (1) if domestic products have become more price- competitive (1). 2(c) Analyse why children from low-income families may have low incomes 6 as adults. Coherent analysis which might include: Likely to receive less education (1) likely to have lower quality healthcare (1) nutrition is likely to be poor (1) likely to gain fewer qualifications/skills (1) be less productive (1) have fewer employment opportunities (1) may be in low paid jobs (1) may be unemployed (1). 2(d) Discuss whether or not a national minimum wage will reduce poverty. 8 In assessing each answer, use the table below. Level Description Marks 3 A reasoned discussion which accurately examines both 6–8 sides of the economic argument, making use of economic information and clear and logical analysis to evaluate economic issues and situations. One side of the argument may have more depth than the other but, overall, both sides of the argument are considered and developed. There is thoughtful evaluation of economic concepts, terminology, information and/or data appropriate to the question. The discussion may also point out the possible uncertainties of alternative decisions and outcomes. 2 A reasoned discussion which makes use of economic 3–5 information and clear analysis to evaluate economic issues and situations. The answer may lack some depth and development may be one-sided. There is relevant use of economic concepts, terminology, information and data appropriate to the question. 1 There is a simple attempt at using economic definitions 1–2 and terminology. Some reference may be made to economic theory, with occasional understanding. 0 A mark of zero should be awarded for no creditable 0 content. Why it might: • is set above the equilibrium level, will raise the pay of the low-paid • may reduce relative poverty by reducing the gap between high and low- income earners • may reduce absolute poverty by enabling low paid workers greater access to basic necessities • may raise employment, if it motivates workers and raises productivity • may raise employment if it increases total (aggregate) demand. Why it might not: • may not have any impact if set below the equilibrium level • unemployment may rise as it may increase firms’ costs of production • will not help the poor who are unable to work • may not reduce relative poverty if it results in other workers pressing for, and getting, wage rises to maintain their wage differentials • some receiving it may not be in poor households. Reward, but do not expect, a national minimum wage diagram which shows the effect on pay and employment.
4 In 2017, the Japanese government announced improvements to its tax system. The amount of tax raised is influenced by the size and age distribution of a country’s population. Japan’s birth and death rates are falling, its population is ageing, and it has low immigration. Overall, Japan’s population is decreasing. (a) State two qualities of a good tax. [2] (b) Explain two causes of a decrease in the death rate. [4] (c) Analyse, using a production possibility curve (PPC) diagram, the effect of a decrease in population size on an economy. [6] (d) Discuss whether or not an ageing population is a benefit to an economy. [8]
20 marks
Mark scheme: 4(a) State two qualities of a good tax. 2 One mark each for two from: convenient, equitable, certain, efficient, flexible. 4(b) Explain two causes of a decrease in the death rate. 4 Logical explanation which might include: Rises in income (1) leading to better living standards (1). Better education (1) resulting in e.g. better nutrition (1). Better healthcare (1) due to e.g. advances in medical technology (1). Reduction in crime/end of a war (1) fewer people dying violently (1). 4(c) Analyse, using a production possibility curve (PPC) diagram, the effect 6 of a decrease in population size on an economy. Up to 4 marks for the diagram: Axes correctly drawn (1). Initial curve drawn as a curve / line sloping downward to the axes (1). New curve drawn as a curve / line sloping downward to the axes (1). Shift to the left indicated by arrow or letter (1). Up to 2 marks for coherent analysis which might include: A decrease in population size may decrease the size of the labour force (1) decrease productive capacity (1). 4(d) Discuss whether or not an ageing population is a benefit to an 8 economy. In assessing each answer, use the table below. Level Description Marks 3 A reasoned discussion which accurately examines both 6–8 sides of the economic argument, making use of economic information and clear and logical analysis to evaluate economic issues and situations. One side of the argument may have more depth than the other but, overall, both sides of the argument are considered and developed. There is thoughtful evaluation of economic concepts, terminology, information and/or data appropriate to the question. The discussion may also point out the possible uncertainties of alternative decisions and outcomes. 2 A reasoned discussion which makes use of economic 3–5 information and clear analysis to evaluate economic issues and situations. The answer may lack some depth and development may be one-sided. There is relevant use of economic concepts, terminology, information and data appropriate to the question. 1 There is a simple attempt at using economic definitions 1–2 and terminology. Some reference may be made to economic theory, with occasional understanding. 0 A mark of zero should be awarded for no creditable 0 content. Why it might: • older people may be an economic asset through their knowledge and experience • the retirement age may be raised so that the labour force may increase • in some countries, an increase in the average age of the population may mean more people are in the labour force and may reduce the dependency ratio • may indicate a good standard of living increasing life expectancy. Why it might not: • may be an increase in the dependency ratio with a smaller proportion of workers to support a higher proportion of retired • any increased spending on healthcare and pensions will involve an opportunity cost • taxes may have to be increased to finance increased costs of healthcare and pensions • any shortage of workers may drive up wages and cause cost-push inflation • older workers may not be up to date with new technology and new ideas
4 Italy is home to the world’s oldest bank and some of the world’s oldest car producers. Internationally, both industries are facing a number of challenges. The wages of bank workers and car workers are increasing. Demand for bank loans and for cars is changing, in part, due to changes in population size. It is predicted that the price elasticity of demand (PED) for cars will also change in the future. (a) State two functions of a commercial bank. [2] (b) Explain two reasons why emigration from a country may increase. [4] (c) Analyse the possible causes of a rise in the wages of bank workers. [6] (d) Discuss whether or not demand for cars will become more price-elastic in the future. [8]
20 marks
Mark scheme: 4(a) State two functions of a commercial bank. Two from: • lending • accepting deposits • allowing customers to make payments • looking after valuables • giving financial advice • providing insurance • exchanging foreign currency 2 Internet banking alone is too vague. 4(b) Explain two reasons why emigration from a country may increase. Logical explanation which might include: Rise in unemployment (1) people move abroad in search of jobs (1). Fall in income (1) seek higher wages abroad (1). Lower living standards (1) e.g. healthcare may be better abroad / less pollution (1). Relaxation on immigration controls (1) making it easier to move abroad (1). Greater social unrest / outbreak of war (1) seek greater security (1). High inflation at home (1) seek lower cost of living (1). 4 One mark for each of two reasons identified and one mark for each of two explanations. Reward answers that give an argument from the opposite perspective but do not double award. Accept ‘static approach’ e.g. unemployment. Question Answer Marks Guidance 4(c) Analyse the possible causes of a rise in the wages of bank workers. Coherent analysis which might include: Demand for bank workers may increase (1) due to higher demand for banking / this may result from more people opening bank accounts/using the services of banks (1) may also result from a rise in the productivity of workers (1) more banks competing for the services of bank workers / more competition for workers (1) higher wages paid to retain bank workers (1). Supply of bank workers may fall (1) qualifications may have been increased (1) skills may have increased / may need to be more skilled as working with more advanced technology (1). Bank workers may use trade union power (1) collective bargaining and/or industrial action (1). Banks may have earned large profits (1) may have rewarded workers with bonuses (1) bonuses / high pay may be used to motivate workers (1). A higher national minimum wage (1) forcing banks to pay some of their staff more (1). Bank workers may work longer hours / may work overtime (1). Bank workers may be more experienced (1) more productive / more skilled (1). Inflation / higher income tax (1) purchasing power will fall unless wages increased (1). 6 Question Answer Marks Guidance 4(d) Discuss whether or not demand for cars will become more price-elastic in the future. In assessing each answer, use the table opposite. Why it might: • may be closer substitutes. Price of public transport and /or quality of public transport may fall making them closer substitutes • may take up a larger proportion of income. Incomes may fall • price may rise. Demand becomes more price elastic as price rises • the number of firms producing certain types of cars may increase • time will give consumers more opportunity to search out lower prices. Why it might not: • may become more of a necessity. People may work further from where they live • may become easier to postpone purchase. If cars last longer, consumers may be able to delay buying replacements • people may have become used to driving – habit forming. May be reluctant not to own and drive a car • price of complements may rise, so that even if price of cars fall, people may not buy more cars. 8 Level Descriptors Mark 3 A reasoned discussion which accurately examines both sides of the economic argument, making use of economic information and clear and logical analysis to evaluate economic issues and situations. One side of the argument may have more depth than the other, but overall both sides of the argument are considered and developed. There is thoughtful evaluation of economic concepts, terminology, information and/or data appropriate to the question. The discussion may also point out the possible uncertainties of alternative decisions and outcomes. 6–8 2 A reasoned discussion which makes use of economic information and clear analysis to evaluate economic issues and situations. The answer may lack some depth and development or may be one-sided. There is relevant use of economic concepts, terminology, information and data appropriate to the question. 3–5 1 There is a simple attempt at using economic definitions and terminology. Some reference may be made to economic theory, with occasional understanding. 1–2 0 A mark of zero should be awarded for no creditable content. 0 Question Answer Marks Guidance 4(d) Example of an L2 answer: Demand for cars may become more price-elastic. People may be more willing to switch to substitutes. If bus transportation reduced market prices, people may use buses rather than buying cars when prices of cars rise. On the other hand, cars may be price-inelastic in the future. They may become more of a necessity if people find buses and trains inconvenient. Cars also show a better standard of living and many jobs require a car which makes having a car a necessity therefore it becomes price-inelastic. Principal Examiner comment: Reasonable on both sides. Reward answers that give an argument from the opposite perspective but do not double award.
1 (a) Calculate the value of Nigeria’s exports of goods in 2017. [1] (b) Identify two examples of capital goods. [2] (c) Explain whether Nigeria had a budget deficit or a budget surplus in 2017. [2] (d) Explain how government spending on training may increase tax revenue in the long run. [4] (e) Analyse how living standards in Nigeria compare with living standards in Ethiopia in 2017. [4] (f) Analyse how a government could encourage firms to increase their investment. [5] (g) Discuss whether or not an increase in Nigeria’s population will benefit its economy. [6] (h) Discuss whether or not an increase in Nigeria’s import tariff on rice would increase the output of Nigerian rice. [6]
30 marks
Mark scheme: 1(a) Calculate the value of Nigeria’s exports of goods in 2017. $43.1bn 1 $ is not essential. 1(b) Identify two examples of capital goods. Two from: • [delivery] vehicles • machines • [office] equipment 2 1(c) Explain whether Nigeria had a budget deficit or a budget surplus in 2017. • budget deficit (1) • government spending exceeded tax revenue (1) • government spending was $19.5bn and tax revenue was $12.9bn (1) 2 1(d) Explain how government spending on training may increase tax revenue in the long run. Logical explanation which might include: • Training may increase skills of workers (1) raise productivity (1) raise wages / incomes (1) increase job opportunities / employment / reduce unemployment (1) increase income tax revenue (1). • Higher wages may increase spending / demand (1) increase indirect tax revenue (1). • A more productive labour force may reduce costs of production (1) raise profits (1) increase corporation tax revenue (1). 4 Question Answer Marks Guidance 1(e) Analyse how living standards in Nigeria compare with the living standards in Ethiopia in 2017. Coherent analysis which might include: • Nigeria’s higher GDP per head (income) (1) suggests Nigerians may have been able to enjoy more goods and services (1). • Nigeria has a lower life expectancy (1) suggesting poorer healthcare (1). • Nigeria has a higher average number of years spent at school (1) suggesting the labour force may be more educated (1). • Nigeria has a higher percentage of underweight five-year olds (1) suggesting poor nutrition / income inequality (1). • Overall comment: Nigeria’s income per head and average years spent at school suggests a higher living standard but life expectancy and percentage of five years underweight suggests a lower living standard (1). 4 Question Answer Marks Guidance 1(f) Analyse how a government could encourage firms to increase their investment. Coherent analysis which might include: • Reduce the rate of interest (1) making it cheaper to borrow (1) encouraging borrowing as consumer spending is likely to rise (1). • Lower corporation tax (1) increasing the funds available to invest (1) increasing the incentive to invest as return from investment would rise (1). • Create greater economic certainty / confidence (1) by e.g. keeping inflation low and stable / not changing government spending and taxation frequently (1) making it easier for firms to plan / it can take time to get a return from investment (1). • Provide subsidies/grants/loans (1) decreasing cost of investments (1) encouraging MNCs (1). • Raise tariffs (1) increasing demand for home produced goods (1). • Less government regulation/policies (1) reduces costs for firms (1) more willing to invest (1). 5 Question Answer Marks Guidance 1(g) Discuss whether or not an increase in Nigeria’s population will benefit its economy. Award up to 4 marks for why it might: • Fall in death rate (1) may indicate improved healthcare (1). • Total (aggregate) demand will increase (1) may enable existing firms to expand / increase output (1) new firms to set up (1) attract MNCs (1). • Labour force may increase (1) causing total (aggregate) supply to increase / raise productive capacity (1) increase output / GDP (1). • May move country towards optimum population (1) if there are unused resources (1). • Net immigration will increase labour force (1) and reduce dependency ratio (1) • More tax revenue (1) can be spent on improving e.g., public services (1). Award up to 4 marks for why it might not: • Birth rate is rising (1) will increase dependency (1) resources which may have increased economic growth may have to be devoted to rearing the children (1). • Labour force may fall in the short run (1) to look after the children (1). • Pressure will be put on the environment (1) there may be more pollution (1) causing overcrowding / poor health (1). • If food output cannot be increased (1) may be more malnourishment/famine / poverty (1) more food is required / food may have to be imported (1) food prices may increase (1). 6 Apply this example to all questions with the command word DISCUSS (1(g), 1(h), 2(d), 3(d), 4(d) and 5(d)) Each point may be credited only once, on either side of an argument, but separate development as to how/why the outcome may differ is rewarded. Generic example Mark Tax revenue may decrease… 1 ...because of reason e.g. incomes may be lower. 1 Tax revenue may increase because incomes may be higher i.e. reverse of a previous argument. 0 Tax revenue may increase because of a different reason i.e. not the reverse of a previous argument e.g. government spending on subsidies may stimulate the economy more than spending on education. 1 Question Answer Marks Guidance 1(g) • Population is rising but age structure may be changing (1) as there is net emigration of young people (1) may result in reduction in labour force (1). • [Opportunity] cost for government (1) which has to spend on health/education rather than infrastructure (1). • Increase in output to meet demand (1) results in faster usage of resources in country (1) and shortages (1). Question Answer Marks Guidance 1(h) Discuss whether or not an increase in Nigeria’s import tariff on rice would increase the output of Nigerian rice. Award up to 4 marks for why it might: • A higher tariff may raise the price of imported rice (1) may reduce demand for / consumption of imported rice (1) may cause Nigerians to demand more home- produced rice as it is cheaper (1) effect would be greater, the greater the elasticity of demand for the import of rice (1) may enable Nigerian rice farmers to raise their price / make more profit (1). • A tariff may raise government tax revenue (1) some of this could be used to subsidise Nigerian rice farmers / modernise farming methods and so raise productivity (1). Award up to 4 marks for why it might not: • Nigerian farmers are less productive than Asian competitors (1) have high(er) costs of production (1) Nigerian price may still be higher even with the higher import tariff (1). • The supply of Nigerian rice may be price-inelastic (1) so even if Nigerian farmers could sell their rice for more, they may have difficulties adjusting supply (1). • More Nigerian rice will not be sold if quality is poor (1) consumers my prefer the varieties of rice produced in other countries (1) other countries retaliate by imposing higher tariffs (1) current account surplus may be reduced (1). • Increase in import tariffs may be small (1) making little difference to import prices and consumption (1). • Not enough resources/ factors of production e.g., farmers (1) to produce more rice in Nigeria (1). 6
4 The Canadian government has introduced a number of policy measures designed to encourage more women to enter the labour force. Canada’s labour force has reduced as its population has aged. The number of workers and their output are influenced by changes in the country’s foreign exchange rate and consumer expenditure. In 2018, the Canadian dollar fell in value while Canadian consumer expenditure increased. (a) Define the labour force. [2] (b) Explain two causes of an ageing population. [4] (c) Analyse how a fall in the value of a country’s foreign exchange rate could reduce a deficit on the current account of its balance of payments. [6] (d) Discuss whether or not an economy will benefit from an increase in consumer expenditure. [8]
20 marks
Mark scheme: 4(a) Define the labour force. • Those who are economically active (2). • Those willing (1) and able to (work) (1). • The employed (1) and the unemployed (1). 2 4(b) Explain two causes of an ageing population. Logical explanation which might include: • A fall in the death rate / increase in life expectancy (1) resulting from better healthcare / better nutrition / higher income / better lifestyles (1). • A fall in the birth rate (1) resulting from higher cost of raising children / fall in child benefit / increase in women working / increase in use of family planning / fall in infant mortality / reduction in need for children to support parents due to provision of state pensions or healthcare (1). • Rise in net emigration of mainly young-aged people (1) resulting from higher incomes abroad / increase in job opportunities abroad (1). 4 One mark each for each of two causes identified and one mark each for each of two explanations. Question Answer Marks Guidance 4(c) Analyse how a fall in the value of a country’s foreign exchange rate could reduce a deficit on the current account of its balance of payments. Coherent analysis which might include: • Foreign exchange rate is the price / value of one currency in terms of another currency or currencies (1) a fall in the value of a foreign exchange rate means that the domestic currency buys less foreign currency / depreciates (1). • A fall will reduce price of exports (1) raise demand for exports (1) increase export revenue (1) money flows into country which will reduce Balance of Payments deficit (1) if demand is elastic (1). • Increase price of imports (1) reduce demand for imports (1) reduce import expenditure (1) reduces the money flows out of the country which reduces the Balance of Payments deficit (1) if demand is elastic (1). 6 Question Answer Marks Guidance 4(d) Discuss whether or not an economy will benefit from an increase in consumer expenditure. In assessing each answer, use the table opposite. Why it might: • may increase total (aggregate) demand which may encourage firms to expand • cause economic growth • reducing cyclical unemployment • raise tax revenue enabling the government to spend more on education and healthcare • eliminate / reduce deflation • raise inflation to the inflation target rate Why it might not: • may cause demand-pull inflation especially if economy is at full capacity • may increase spending on imports • may divert exports to the home market • may cause a deficit on the current account of the balance of payments • may reduce long run economic growth as resources may be diverted away from producing capital goods • may increase the consumption of demerit goods 8 Level Description Marks 3 A reasoned discussion which accurately examines both sides of the economic argument, making use of economic information and clear and logical analysis to evaluate economic issues and situations. One side of the argument may have more depth than the other, but overall both sides of the argument are considered and developed. There is thoughtful evaluation of economic concepts, terminology, information and/or data appropriate to the question. The discussion may also point out the possible uncertainties of alternative decisions and outcomes. 6–8 2 A reasoned discussion which makes use of economic information and clear analysis to evaluate economic issues and situations. The answer may lack some depth and development may be one- sided. There is relevant use of economic concepts, terminology, information and data appropriate to the question. 3–5 Question Answer Marks Guidance 4(d) Level Description Marks 1 There is a simple attempt at using economic definitions and terminology. Some reference may be made to economic theory, with occasional understanding. 1–2 0 A mark of zero should be awarded for no creditable content. 0
1 (a) Calculate Chile’s agricultural output in 2017. [1] (b) Identify two disadvantages of a country specialising. [2] (c) Explain one reason why demand for cherries is price-elastic. [2] (d) Explain how Chile’s population structure differs from Haiti’s population structure. [4] (e) Analyse why China buys most of its cherries from Chile. [4] (f) Analyse why Chilean astronomers are paid more than Chilean farm workers. [5] (g) Discuss whether or not Chilean consumers would benefit from more government intervention in the economy. [6] (h) Discuss whether or not the Haitian economy would benefit from fewer of its people working in Chile. [6]
30 marks
Mark scheme: 1(a) Calculate Chile’s agricultural output in 2017. $11.76bn / $11 760 000 000 / $11 760m (1). 1 Accept $11.8bn and $12bn. $ is not essential. 1(b) Identify two disadvantages of a country specialising. Two from: • demand may fall / new competitors may appear • supply/output may fall / diseases / natural disasters / bad weather may affect agricultural output / costs may rise • non-renewable resources may run out • structural unemployment may occur • reliance on imports no longer produced by home country / overdependency on other countries 2 One mark each for each of two disadvantages. Rely on a small number of industries is not sufficient. 1(c) Explain one reason why demand for cherries is price-elastic. A luxury product (1) they do not have to be purchased / not essential / not a necessity (1). Has close substitutes (1) example / rise in price will cause some people to switch to rival products (1). 2 In terms of close substitutes, also accept: fall in price will cause some people to switch towards this product and away from rival products. One mark for the reason identified and one mark for the explanation. A candidate who writes a luxury product and has close substitutes and no more has identified two reasons, so just one mark. If a candidate identifies one of the two reasons but does not explain it and then identifies the second reason and explains it, the second reason can be taken and with the explanation, 2 marks. Question Answer Marks Guidance 1(d) Explain how Chile’s population structure differs from Haiti’s population structure. Logical explanation which might include: Chile has a higher proportion of its population aged over 65 / Haiti a lower proportion aged over 65 (1). Chile has a lower proportion of the population aged under 15 / Haiti has a higher proportion aged under 15 (1). Chile is likely to have a lower birth rate / Haiti is likely to have a higher birth rate (1). Chile likely to have a lower death rate / Haiti is likely to have a higher death rate (1). Chile’s population pyramid indicates a relatively high level of development/high income country / Haiti’s population pyramid indicates a relatively low level of development/low income country (1). Chile’s population pyramid is less pyramid shaped / more stationary / constrictive / bulges out in the middle / more egg-shaped / Haiti’s is more pyramid shaped / more expansive (1). Lower dependency ratio in Chile / higher dependency ratio in Haiti (1). Higher proportion of population of working age in Chile / lower proportion of population of working age in Haiti (1). Higher population size in Chile / lower population size in Haiti (1). 4 Accept for the first and second points other relevant age ranges e.g. over 60, under 10. Accept longer life expectancy for lower death rate and shorter life expectancy for higher death rate. Note that each country overall has more females than males, so not a difference. Question Answer Marks Guidance 1(d) Chile has a higher average age / older population / Haiti has a lower average age population / younger population (1). 1(e) Analyse why China buys most of its cherries from Chile. Coherent analysis which might include: Chile has high production standards (1) cherries are likely to be of a high quality (1). China does not impose tariffs on Chilean cherries (1) may keep their price low (1). 4 Free trade agreement on its own is not sufficient. 1(f) Analyse why Chilean astronomers are paid more than Chilean farm workers. Coherent analysis which might include: Most astronomers have a university degree (1) high cost of training/ long period of training (1) well qualified / well educated / high level of knowledge (1) highly productive / highly skilled / efficient (1) in short supply (1) high demand (1) more inelastic demand (1) more inelastic supply (1). Most work in the public sector (1) government may be more willing / able to pay higher wages (1) public sector workers are more likely to belong to a trade union (1) have stronger bargaining power (1). 5 Also accept an approach based on an analysis of why Chilean farm workers are paid less than Chilean astronomers. This may include reference to immigrant farm workers who may be prepared to accept relatively low wages and Chilean farm workers being replaced by capital equipment / more replaceable than astronomers. Question Answer Marks Guidance 1(g) Discuss whether or not Chilean consumers would benefit from more government intervention in the economy. Award up to 4 marks for why they might: • evidence of market failure (1) • merit goods may be underproduced (1) as under- consumed (1) • demerit goods may be overproduced (1) as overconsumed (1) • external costs could be reduced (1) external benefits may be increased (1) external costs / external benefits are not taken into account by the private sector (1) • public goods may not be produced (1) no profit incentive to make them (1) as there can be free riders (1) • inequality (1) poor consumers may lose out / there may be poverty (1) resources may not be devoted to producing what the poor need (1) may not be able to afford prices charged (1) • government subsidies (1) can lower prices (1) • government could set maximum prices (1) lower prices of necessities (1) • government could control (private sector) monopoly power (1) prevent abuse of market power (1) • government investment in education (1) could lower prices / raise quality of output (1). Award up to 4 marks for why they might not: • government failure may occur (1) e.g. government may lack information (1). • market forces can provide wide choice of products (1) may be consumer sovereignty (1) 6 Apply this example to all questions with the command word DISCUSS (1(g), 1(h), 2(d), 3(d), 4(d) and 5(d)) Not taking lower taxes, lower subsidies or reduced immigration controls as a form of government intervention. Each point may be credited only once, on either side of an argument, but separate development as to how/why the outcome may differ is rewarded. Generic example mark Tax revenue may decrease … 1 ... because of reason e.g. incomes may be lower. 1 Tax revenue may increase because incomes may be higher i.e. reverse of a previous argument. 0 Tax revenue may increase because of a different reason i.e. not the reverse of a previous argument e.g. government spending on subsidies may stimulate the economy more than spending on education. 1 Question Answer Marks Guidance 1(g) • profit incentive (1) industries may respond to changes in consumer demand (1) • efficient industries (1) prices may be low (1) quality may be high (1) • government intervention in the form of nationalisation (1) may reduce competition (1). • government taxes / tariffs / regulation / minimum wages (1) may increase costs (1) raise prices (1) • maximum prices could reduce availability of products (1) • government limits on immigration (1) may reduce availability of products / raise prices (1) Question Answer Marks Guidance 1(h) Discuss whether or not the Haitian economy would benefit from fewer of its people working in Chile. Award up to 4 marks for why it might: • wages may be low in Chile (1) work involves unskilled labour (1) • employment may be rising in Haiti (1) the country could keep more of its skilled workers (1) • larger labour force / more workers (1) higher total demand (1) increase GDP / increase economic growth / increase productive potential (1) increase living standards (1) increase exports (1) • rise in the numbers employed in Haiti could increase tax revenue (1) may enable more spending on e.g. education (1) • fewer parents may leave behind dependent relatives (1) reduce burden on the government (1) • jobs could be found in other countries (1) Award up to 4 marks for why it might not: • wages may be higher in Chile (1) fewer emigrant workers may send money home (1) living standards may be lower (1) lower spending (1) • less money coming into the country (1) may increase a current account deficit (1) • job opportunities may be higher in Chile (1) unemployment may rise in Haiti (1) • if unemployment rises in Haiti, cost of unemployment benefits may rise (1) opportunity cost / higher taxation (1) • opportunities to gain new skills may be reduced (1) these skills could be brought back into the country (1) 6 For an approach which discusses whether or not the Haitian economy benefits from its people working in Chile, award a maximum of 3 marks. Question Answer Marks Guidance 1(h) • may reduce pressure to invest / spend on capital equipment (1) reduce advances in technology / reduce increases in efficiency / productivity (1) • may increase overcrowding / overpopulation (1) increase external costs / pollution (1) pressure on resources (1).
4 Turkey’s birth rate is falling which is likely to reduce its supply of labour. However, improvements in the quality of labour and the increase in foreign multinational companies (MNCs) operating in Turkey (the host country to the MNCs) may help the economy avoid a recession. One reason why economists are worried that a recession may occur is an expected rise in the interest rate. (a) Define birth rate. [2] (b) Explain two causes of an increase in the quality of labour in a country. [4] (c) Analyse how a rise in the interest rate could cause a recession. [6] (d) Discuss whether or not MNCs improve the economic performance of the host countries in which they operate. [8]
20 marks
Mark scheme: 4(a) Define birth rate. The number of births per thousand of the population (1) in a year (1) live births (1) 2 Not sufficient to have just number of births. 4(b) Explain two causes of an increase in the quality of labour in a country. Logical explanation which might include: Improvements in education (1) qualifications / knowledge (1). Improvements in training (1) increasing skills (1). Improvements in healthcare (1) making workers physically/mentally stronger (1). Increases in pay (1) raising motivation (1). Improvements in nutrition (1) enabling workers to work harder / concentrate more (1). Reduction in working hours / length of working day (1) keeping workers fresher / enabling them to concentrate more (1). Improvements in working conditions (1) raising motivation / enabling workers to work harder / concentrate more (1) Immigration (1) of skilled workers (1). Experience (1) becoming more familiar with tasks (1). Specialisation (1) become more familiar with one task / ‘practice makes perfect’ (1). 4 One mark each for each of two causes identified and one mark each for each of two explanations. Question Answer Marks Guidance 4(c) Analyse how a rise in the interest rate could cause a recession. Coherent analysis which might include: A higher interest rate would increase the cost of borrowing (1) reduce borrowing (1) reduce the spending power of people who have borrowed in the past (1) increase saving (1) consumer expenditure / spending may fall (1) investment may fall / may discourage MNCs (1) unemployment may increase / employment may fall (1) total demand may fall (1) the output of goods and services / GDP may fall (1) if output falls over a period of two quarters / six months there will be a recession (1). A higher interest rate may encourage more people to buy the currency (1) to put money into the country’s financial institutions (1) raising the value of the foreign exchange rate (1) raising the price of exports (1) lowering demand for exports (1) reducing the price of imports (1) increasing demand for imports (1). 6 Question Answer Marks Guidance 4(d) Discuss whether or not MNCs improve the economic performance of the host countries in which they operate. In assessing each answer, use the table opposite. Why they might: • may bring in new technology and methods of production, increasing economic growth • may create new jobs, may reduce unemployment • may add to exports, reducing a current account deficit / increasing a current account surplus • may create more competition / have greater efficiency, lowering inflation • may increase tax revenue, enabling the government to spend more on e.g. education and healthcare Why they might not: • may drive out domestic producers, leaving the country’s output unchanged • may employ workers from their home country • may import capital equipment and raw materials from their home countries • may deplete non-renewable resources, reducing sustainable economic growth • may provide only low-skilled, low-paid jobs to locals • send profits back to home country • may cause external costs e.g. pollution 8 Help avoid a recession = one relevant identification. Level Description Marks 3 A reasoned discussion which accurately examines both sides of the economic argument, making use of economic information and clear and logical analysis to evaluate economic issues and situations. One side of the argument may have more depth than the other, but overall both sides of the argument are considered and developed. There is thoughtful evaluation of economic concepts, terminology, information and/or data appropriate to the question. The discussion may also point out the possible uncertainties of alternative decisions and outcomes. 6–8 2 A reasoned discussion which makes use of economic information and clear analysis to evaluate economic issues and situations. The answer may lack some depth and development may be one-sided. There is relevant use of economic concepts, terminology, information and data appropriate to the question. 3–5 1 There is a simple attempt at using economic definitions and terminology. Some reference may be made to economic theory, with occasional understanding. 1–2 0 A mark of zero should be awarded for no creditable content. 0
2 A number of countries, including Morocco, capture water from fog. Water is used in the primary, secondary and tertiary sectors. In recent years, Morocco has increased the quantity and quality of its resources and has moved more of them into the tertiary sector. The quantity, quality and composition of a country’s resources are influenced by a number of factors, including its birth rate. Morocco’s birth rate fell from 19.9 in 2016 to 18.7 in 2018. (a) Define a free good. [2] (b) Explain, with examples, the difference between the secondary sector and the tertiary sector. [4] (c) Analyse, using a production possibility curve (PPC), the effect of an increase in the quality of its resources on an economy. [6] (d) Discuss whether or not a fall in a country’s birth rate will benefit an economy. [8]
20 marks
Mark scheme: 2(a) Define a free good. No opportunity cost (1) a good that takes no resources/factors of production to produce / naturally abundant in supply / does not use scarce resources (1). 2(b) Explain, with examples, the difference between the secondary sector and the tertiary sector. Logical explanation which might include: Secondary sector covers manufacturing (and construction) / converts primary products into finished goods (1) e.g. car industry (1). Tertiary sector covers services / final stage of production (1) e.g. insurance (1). 4 For tertiary sector, it is not sufficient to just have the sector which sells products as this is only part of the sector. But for the tertiary sector example accept the sale of a product e.g. the sale of jewellery. Question Answer Marks Guidance 2(c) Analyse, using a production possibility curve (PPC), the effect of an increase in the quality of its resources on an economy. Up to 4 marks for the diagram: Axes correctly labelled with different outputs (1). Initial curve drawn as a curve / line sloping downward to the axes (1). New curve drawn as a curve / line sloping downward to the axes (1). Shift indicated by arrow or letter (1). Up to 2 marks for coherent analysis which might include: Better quality resources will increase productivity (1) enable more of both types of goods to be produced (1) with a given quantity of resources (1) increase productive potential / productive capacity / total supply (1) cause economic growth (1). 6 Nothing for higher output, higher GDP as this is uncertain. Question Answer Marks Guidance 2(d) Discuss whether or not a fall in a country’s birth rate will benefit an economy. In assessing each answer, use the table opposite. Why it might: • reduce the number of dependents • fewer workers away from work to bring up children • enable resources to be used to increase economic growth / raise living standards • reduce pressure on the environment • move towards the optimum population Why it might not: • reduce the size of the labour force in the longer term • reduce labour mobility • create an ageing population • reduce size of markets 8 Level Description Marks 3 A reasoned discussion which accurately examines both sides of the economic argument, making use of economic information and clear and logical analysis to evaluate economic issues and situations. One side of the argument may have more depth than the other, but overall, both sides of the argument are considered and developed. There is thoughtful evaluation of economic concepts, terminology, information and/or data appropriate to the question. The discussion may also point out the possible uncertainties of alternative decisions and outcomes. 6–8 2 A reasoned discussion which makes use of economic information and clear analysis to evaluate economic issues and situations. The answer may lack some depth and development may be one-sided. There is relevant use of economic concepts, terminology, information and data appropriate to the question. 3–5 1 There is a simple attempt at u sing economic definitions and terminology. Some reference may be made to economic theory, with occasional understanding. 1–2 Question Answer Marks Guidance 2(d) Level Description Marks 0 A mark of zero should be awarded for no creditable content. 0
1 (a) Calculate the number of births in Cyprus in 2019. [1] (b) Identify two indicators of living standards. [2] (c) State why the global market for grapes was in disequilibrium in 2019. [2] (d) Explain two reasons why more well-educated workers tend to work past retirement age than less-educated workers. [4] (e) Analyse how a rise in a country’s retirement age is likely to affect its government’s budget. [4] (f) Analyse the relationship between inflation rates and current account balances. [5] (g) Discuss whether or not, after 2019, Cyprus’s production possibility curve (PPC) is likely to shift to the right. [6] (h) Discuss whether or not adopting capital-intensive production will benefit consumers. [6]
30 marks
Mark scheme: 1(a) Calculate the number of births in Cyprus in 2019. 12 240 (1) 1 1(b) Identify two indicators of living standards. GDP per head / per capita (1). HDI (1). Life expectancy / healthy people (1). Proportion of people in primary sector (1). Level of education / qualifications (1). 2 Do not reward GDP 1(c) State why the global market for grapes was in disequilibrium in 2019. Bad weather / failure of the grape harvest (1) there was a shortage (1) which means demand exceeded supply (1). 2 1(d) Explain two reasons why more well-educated workers tend to work past retirement age than less-educated workers. Logical explanation which might include: Well-paid / good work benefits (1) which provides an incentive to work for longer / high job satisfaction / enter workforce late (1). Healthy (1) and so more able to work for longer / remain productive (1). Work in jobs which do not require physical strength / less tiring (1) older workers tend to be less strong / allows them to continue working as long as remain fit (1). 4 One mark for each of two reasons identified and one mark for each explanation. Question Answer Marks Guidance 1(e) Analyse how a rise in a country’s retirement age is likely to affect its government’s budget. Coherent analysis which might include: A rise in the retirement age / less people retired will reduce the cost of pensions (1) may reduce government spending / government may spend on alternatives e.g., infrastructure, education or health (1). More people in work will increase incomes / businesses expand production (1) raise direct tax revenue (1) spending will increase (1) raise indirect tax revenue (1). 4 Question Answer Marks Guidance 1(f) Analyse the relationship between inflation rates and current account balances. Coherent analysis which might include: Overview: Generally, an inverse relationship / the lower the inflation rate, the higher the current account surplus or the higher the inflation rate, the higher the current account deficit (1). Supporting evidencemax of 2 marks Mongolia has the highest inflation rate (1) and the largest current account deficit (1) Mongolia / Kenya / Nepal have the highest inflation rates (1) all have a current account deficit (1). Iceland / Slovenia have a low rate of inflation (1) but have a current balance of payments surplus (1) Exception: Cyprus lowest inflation rate (1) but a current account deficit / 3rd highest current account deficit (1). Comments: Most of the table shows the expected relationship. (1) Low inflation rates may make products more price competitive / high inflation rates may make prices less price competitive (1) 5 Do not accept current account balance is high or low. Answers need to refer to size of surplus or deficit. Simply using data without explanation is description rather than analysis. Question Answer Marks Guidance 1(g) Discuss whether or not, after 2019, Cyprus’s production possibility curve (PPC) is to shift to the right. Award up to 4 marks for logical reasons why it might, which may include: Quantity / quality of resources may have increased (1) retirement age may have increased (1) people living longer (1) so labour force is likely to have increased (1). Investment may have increased (1) due to low interest rates (1) more capital goods would increase productive capacity (1). Award up to 4 marks for logical reasons why it might not, which may include: Quantity and quality of resources may have decreased (1) land quality is decreasing (1) which will reduce the productivity of land (1). Entrepreneurs may emigrate (1) reducing the supply of enterprise / skilled workers (1). Birth rate is falling (1) size of workforce may fall in future (1) Covid19 may have reduced productivity (1). For recognising that any of these reasons could result in PPC shifting to the left / stay unchanged (1). 6 Apply this example to all questions with the command word DISCUSS (1g, 1h, 2d, 3d, 4d and 5d) Each point may be credited only once, on either side of an argument, but separate development as to how/why the outcome may differ is rewarded. Generic example Marks Tax revenue may decrease 1 because of reason e.g., incomes may be lower. 1 Tax revenue may increase because incomes may be higher i.e., reverse of a previous argument. 0 Tax revenue may increase because of a different reason i.e., not the reverse of a previous argument e.g., government spending on subsidies may stimulate the economy more than spending on education. 1 Question Answer Marks Guidance 1(h) Discuss whether or not adopting capital-intensive production will benefit consumers. Award up to 4 marks for logical reasons why it might, which may include: It may reduce costs of production / more efficient / may result in economies of scale (1) lower costs may reduce prices (1). It may avoid disruption to supply (1) as no industrial action / strikes (1). It may be quicker / faster (1) to respond to changes in consumer demand (1) It may raise quality (1) as absence of human error (1). Award up to 4 marks for logical reasons why it might not, which may include: Products may be standardised / lack variety (1) individual wants may not be met (1). Capital equipment may break down / costly to maintain (1) causing delays in production (1). Initial high cost of capital equipment (1) may push up prices (1). 6
1 (a) Calculate Bhutan’s GDP in 2018. [1] (b) Identify two indicators that are in both the World Happiness Index and the Human Development Index. [2] (c) State why Bhutan’s 2018 government budget is likely to have increased total demand in Bhutan. [2] (d) Explain two reasons why someone may prefer to work in the tertiary sector rather than in the primary sector. [4] (e) Analyse how investment in capital goods and education can increase New Zealand’s productivity. [4] (f) Analyse the relationship between GDP per head and net migration. [5] (g) Discuss whether or not enterprise is likely to have increased in New Zealand after 2019. [6] (h) Discuss whether or not a cut in income tax rates will increase living standards. [6]
30 marks
Mark scheme: 1(a) Calculate Bhutan’s GDP in 2018. $2.6 bn / $2600 m / $2 600 000 000 / 2.6 10⁹ (1). 1(b) Identify two indicators that are in both the World Happiness Index and the Human Development Index. Life expectancy (1) GDP per head (1). 2 If more than two indicators are given, consider the first three. 1(c) State why Bhutan’s 2018 government budget is likely to have increased total demand in Bhutan. Government spending was greater than government revenue (1) there was a budget deficit (1) of $70 m (1) the government may have used expansionary fiscal policy (1). 2 1(d) Explain two reasons why someone may prefer to work in the tertiary sector rather than in the primary sector. Logical explanation which might include: Better working conditions / non-wage factors (1) e.g. working inside / not having to work in wet weather / less stress / more job satisfaction / fringe benefits (1). Shorter working hours (1) permitting more leisure time (1). Type of work / less physically demanding / not manual work (1) less risk to health / less tiring / less dangerous / fewer accidents / may lack physical strength (1). Better paid (1) enabling more goods and services to be purchased / higher standard of living / as may require more qualifications / skills/training / value added may greater in the tertiary sector / tertiary sector may be expanding / primary sector contracting / may be higher demand for tertiary workers (1). 4 One mark for each of two reasons identified and one mark for each explanation. Note there is a degree of ‘mix and match’ here. For example, working hours or manual work can be taken as a development of working conditions. Accept an answer that explains the disadvantages of working in the primary sector e.g. may prefer to work in the tertiary sector as working hours are longer in the primary sector. Question Answer Marks Guidance 1(e) Analyse how investment in capital goods and education can increase New Zealand’s productivity. Coherent analysis which might include: Higher investment in capital goods will enable workers to work with better equipment (1) more output per worker / worker hour (1). New capital goods may incorporate advances in technology / be of higher quality (1) result in innovation (1) can work for long hours (1). Higher investment in education can enable more children to be educated / children to be educated for longer / improve quality of education / increase knowledge (1) increase workers’ skills / qualifications (1) enable workers to use more advanced technology (1). Investment in capital goods and/or education can enable capital goods/ workers to work at a faster rate (1) be more efficient (1) make fewer mistakes / less wastage (1). 4 Up to 3 marks for analysis on investment in capital goods and up to 3 marks for investment in education. Note only credit increase efficiency once. Question Answer Marks Guidance 1(f) Analyse the relationship between GDP per head and net migration. Coherent analysis which might include: Overview Generally, the countries with higher GDP per head have net immigration / net migration / the countries with lower GDP per head tend to have net emigration / positive/direct relationship (1). Supporting evidence Up to 2 marks for two pieces of supporting evidence e.g. New Zealand has the highest GDP per head and the highest net immigration / net migration / highest positive migration (1) Cyprus has the second highest GDP per head and the second highest net immigration / net migration / positive migration (1) the four countries with the highest GDP per head, all have net immigration / positive net migration (1) the two countries with lowest GDP per head both have net emigration / negative net migration (1) Exception Exception is Kenya or Mozambique (1) Kenya has higher GDP per head but higher net emigration than Mozambique (1). Comments Higher GDP per head may encourage people to move to the country to increase their living standards / income / people who migrate into the country may be high skilled / lower GDP per head may encourage people to emigrate to increase their living standards/income (1) other influences e.g. immigration controls / size of population / wars / political instability (1). 5 There may be an implied comparison e.g. generally countries with a high GDP per head have net immigration. New Zealand has a GDP per head of approx. $55 000 and net immigration of about 40,00 whereas Kenya has a GDP per head of $2,000 and net emigration of about 50 000 (1 mark). For explanation of exception, do not accept that Kenya has ‘lower net migration’ / Mozambique has ‘higher net migration’ – a misinterpretation of the figure. Question Answer Marks Guidance 1(g) Discuss whether or not enterprise is likely to have increased in New Zealand after 2019. Award up to 4 marks for logical reasons why it might, which may include: High labour productivity / high-skilled workers (1) may keep costs down (1) and increase profits (1) which will motivate more people to be entrepreneurs (1). Higher investment / better quality capital goods (1) may increase the number of firms / result in expansion of firms (1) and the opportunities to become entrepreneurs (1). Investment in education / better quality education (1) may increase the people with the skills to become entrepreneurs / increase risk taking ability (1). Higher government spending on mental health / child poverty / pollution (1) may increase workers’ skills / increase workers’ health / increase workers’ productivity (1) higher government subsidies (1) reduce firms’ costs of production (1) higher government spending may increase total demand (1). Higher economic growth (1) may have created more opportunities / greater confidence / higher total demand (1). Net immigration may have continued (1) and some immigrants may have been entrepreneurs / may set up new firms (1) more people in the country may raise total demand (1). Cut in income tax rates (1) could increase demand (1) firms’ revenue / profits (1) create greater profit incentive (1). 6 Apply this example to all questions with the command word DISCUSS (1g, 1h, 2d, 3d, 4d and 5d) Each point may be credited only once, on either side of an argument, but separate development as to how/why the outcome may differ is rewarded. Generic example Mark Tax revenue may decrease… 1 ...because of reason e.g., incomes may be lower. 1 Tax revenue may increase because incomes may be higher i.e., reverse of a previous argument. 0 Tax revenue may increase because of a different reason i.e., not the reverse of a previous argument e.g. government spending on subsidies may stimulate the economy more than spending on education. 1 Question Answer Marks Guidance 1(g) Award up to 4 marks for logical reasons why it might not, which may include: Uncertainty / lack of confidence (1) reason e.g. there may have been a recession / negative economic growth / unclear what may happen to GDP (1) which could have resulted in the reward to enterprise declining (1) may think there is a greater risk of running / setting up a firm (1). Corporation tax may have increased / tax may have increased (1) which would reduce retained profits / amount of profit that can be kept (1). Government attempts to reduce pollution / poverty / improve mental health (1) may increase firms’ costs of production and reduce profits (1) may have an opportunity cost (1) less spending on something that could increase enterprise (1) e.g. reduction is spending on education (1). Accept tax revenue may have increased for tax may have increased for why it might not Reward recognition that tax revenue may rise without a rise in tax rates or with a fall in tax rates. Question Answer Marks Guidance 1(h) Discuss whether or not a cut in income tax rates will increase living standards. Award up to 4 marks for logical reasons why it might, which may include: Will increase disposable income (1) increase ability to buy goods and services / increase purchasing power (1) buy basic necessities / reduce absolute poverty (1) may be able to fulfil more wants / buy more luxuries (1). May increase spending (1) increase total demand (1) reduce unemployment / increase employment (1) increase output / increase economic growth (1). May increase saving (1) and so provide a safety net (1). May encourage investment (1) which may lower costs of production (1) reduce prices (1). May be able to buy more merit goods / better quality education/healthcare (1) increase health / life expectancy (1). May increase the incentive to work (1) may earn more in work than on unemployment benefits (1). May enable people to work fewer hours (1) enjoy more leisure time (1). 6 Rise in income is not sufficient – need idea of disposable income. Question Answer Marks Guidance 1(h) Award up to 4 marks for logical reasons why it might not, which may include: Tax revenue may fall (1) may result in a cut in government spending (1) on e.g. education / health care / mental healthcare / child poverty / pollution / unemployment benefit (1) poor may be most reliant on public services (1). It may increase congestion as people buy more cars (1) may lead to pollution (1). It may increase depletion of non-renewable resources as consumption increases (1). It may benefit mostly the rich / poor may not benefit / will not benefit the unemployed (1) and so not everyone may enjoy higher living standards (1). People may spend on demerit goods (1) higher spending which could reduce health / life expectancy (1). Higher spending / demand may increase prices / cause inflation (1) leave purchasing power unchanged / reduce purchasing power (1).
4 The South Korean government thinks that Japan is dumping steel. South Korean firms trade with, and produce in, other countries. Some South Korean multinational companies (MNCs) claim to reduce poverty in their host countries. In 2019, South Korean firms were affected by a depreciation in South Korea’s foreign exchange rate. Some firms also experienced a shortage of workers, which was influenced by the country’s very low birth rate. (a) Define dumping. [2] (b) Explain two reasons why a country’s foreign exchange rate may depreciate. [4] (c) Analyse how a MNC could reduce poverty in a host country. [6] (d) Discuss whether or not a very low birth rate would be a cause for concern for a government. [8]
20 marks
Mark scheme: 4(a) Define dumping. The sale of a product at less than cost price (1) in a foreign country (1) to gain a larger market share (1) to get rid of surplus stock / to prevent price falling on the domestic market (1). 2 Accept the sale of a product at a low price. 4(b) Explain two reasons why a country’s foreign exchange rate may depreciate. Logical explanation which might include: Inflation / fall in productivity (1) may make domestic products less internationally competitive / reducing net exports / reducing exports / increasing imports (1). Income at home may rise (1) increasing demand for imports / diverting products from the home market (1). Incomes abroad may have fallen (1) reducing demand for exports (1). The rate of interest may have fallen (1) discouraging an inflow of funds from other countries / encouraging an outflow of funds to other countries (1). There may be speculation that the currency will fall in value (1) selling the currency before it falls in value (1) Inward foreign direct investment may fall / outward fdi may increase (1) due to changes in economic activity (1). A central bank/government may sell the currency (1) to increase exports / reduce imports / improve the balance of payments (1). Increase in supply of currency (could be shown by a diagram) (1). Decrease in demand for the currency (could be shown on a diagram) (1). 4 One mark for each of two reasons identified and one mark for each explanation. A common response may be an increase in the supply of the currency (1) to buy more imports (1); A decrease in demand for the currency (1) if less exports are sold (1). Total = 4. Question Answer Marks Guidance 4(c) Analyse how a MNC could reduce poverty in a host country. Coherent analysis which might include: A MNC could increase employment / create job opportunities (1) some of the unemployed could gain jobs / unemployment could fall (1). It may pay higher wages / incomes may rise (1) increasing workers’ ability to buy products / buy basic necessities (1). It may provide accommodation (1) and healthcare for workers (1). It may provide infrastructure (1) making e.g. transport/energy more affordable (1). It may provide training / invest in education (1) enabling people to earn higher wages in the long run (1). It may sell products at a cheaper price (1) enabling more goods and services to be purchased (1). It may pay taxes to the government / tax revenue may rise (1) enabling the government to spend on measures to reduce poverty (1). 6 Question Answer Marks Guidance 4(d) Discuss whether or not a very low birth rate would be a cause for concern for a government. In assessing each answer, use the table opposite. Why it might: may create an ageing population may reduce size of the labour force in the future may increase dependency ratio may reduce tax revenue may take population below the optimum level. Why it might not: may maintain the size of the labour force in the short run as parents do not have to leave the labour force may reduce overcrowding may reduce pollution may reduce depletion of non-renewable resources. 8 Level Description Marks 3 A reasoned discussion which accurately examines both sides of the economic argument, making use of economic information and clear and logical analysis to evaluate economic issues and situations. One side of the argument may have more depth than the other, but overall, both sides of the argument are considered and developed. There is thoughtful evaluation of economic concepts, terminology, information and/or data appropriate to the question. The discussion may also point out the possible uncertainties of alternative decisions and outcomes. 68 Question Answer Marks Guidance 4(d) 2 A reasoned discussion which makes use of economic information and clear analysis to evaluate economic issues and situations. The answer may lack some depth and development may be one-sided. There is relevant use of economic concepts, terminology, information and data appropriate to the question. 35 1 There is a simple attempt at using economic definitions and terminology. Some reference may be made to economic theory, with occasional understanding. 12 0 A mark of zero should be awarded for no creditable content. 0
1 (a) Calculate how many dollars 6400 Nigerian naira would have bought in 2019. [1] (b) Identify two ways a bank could increase demand for its services. [2] (c) State why a merger between two commercial banks is a horizontal merger. [2] (d) Explain two reasons why a large US commercial bank may charge a high price for its services. [4] (e) Analyse how an increase in unemployment may affect the Nigerian government’s budget. [4] (f) Analyse the relationship between countries’ average years of schooling and birth rates. [5] (g) Discuss whether or not a subsidy, given to farmers by the Nigerian government, would reduce the deficit on the current account of its balance of payments. [6] (h) Discuss whether or not the US government should impose a minimum price on chocolate. [6]
30 marks
Mark scheme: Question Answer Marks Guidance 1(a) Calculate how many dollars 6400 Nigerian naira would 1 have bought in 2019. 16 (1). 1(b) Identify two ways a bank could increase demand for its 2 services. Open more branches (1) carry out an advertising campaign (1) improve online / mobile banking (1). 1(c) State why a merger between two commercial banks is a 2 horizontal merger. Same stage of production / both in the tertiary (service) sector / same sector (1) same industry / same product / same service (1) can increase market share (1). 1(d) Explain two reasons why a large US commercial bank 4 One mark for each of two reasons identified and one mark may charge a high price for its services. for each explanation. Logical explanation which might include: High spending on opening new branches / advertising campaigns / developing online banking (1) need to get back costs / make a profit / may experience diseconomies of scale (1). May offer high quality services (1) have high demand / customers willing to pay a high price (1). High degree of monopoly / market power / control 32% of market (1) customers may have brand loyalty / reluctant to switch banks / lack of substitutes / inelastic demand / can charge high prices to earn high profits/raise total revenue / be a price maker (1). High incomes in the US (1) many customers have the ability to pay a high price (1). Employ skilled / well educated workers (1) so may pay high wages / may have high costs of production (1). 1(e) Analyse how an increase in unemployment may affect 4 the Nigerian government’s budget. Coherent analysis which might include: Likely to increase a deficit / reduce a surplus / may result in a budget deficit (1). Tax revenue likely to fall / budget likely to fall (1) due to lower incomes (1) less income tax revenue (1) lower profits (1) less corporation tax revenue (1) lower spending (1) less indirect tax revenue (1) government may cut taxes to reduce unemployment (1). Government spending likely to rise (1) more spending on e.g. benefits / subsidies to the poor / law and order/ healthcare (1) may be more spending on measures to reduce unemployment / expansionary fiscal policy (1) may spend less on other areas e.g. education (1). 1(f) Analyse the relationship between countries’ average 5 No marks for just stating what the figures are e.g. Germany years of schooling and birth rates. has 15 years of schooling and a birth rate of approximately 8. US has 14 years of schooling and a birth rate of Coherent analysis which might include: approximately 12. Argentina has 11 years of schooling and Overview a birth rate of approximately 16 etc. Generally, an inverse relationship / the more years of schooling, the lower the birth rate / the fewer years of schooling, the higher the birth rate (1). Supporting evidence Up to 2 marks maximum for two pieces of relevant supporting evidence e.g.: • Germany has the highest years of schooling and lowest birth rate (1) • Chad has lowest years of schooling and highest birth rate (1) • US has more years of schooling than Argentina and so a lower birth rate (1) • the three countries with three highest years of schooling have the three lowest birth rates (1). Exception Nigeria / Eritrea (1) Nigeria has more years of schooling than Eritrea but a higher birth rate (1). Comments More years of schooling is likely to cause people to form partnerships / have children later / focus on careers / increase awareness of contraception/family planning / increase health / reduce size of families (1) increase cost of raising children / having more children may reduce the ability of families to keep their children in education for many years / exception may be result of other influences e.g. differences in fertility rates / differences in social attitudes (1). 1(g) Discuss whether or not a subsidy, given to farmers by 6 Apply this example to all questions with the command the Nigerian government, would reduce the deficit on word DISCUSS the current account of its balance of payments. (1g, 1h, 2d, 3d, 4d and 5d) Award up to 4 marks for logical reasons why it might, which Each point may be credited only once, on either side of an may include: argument, but separate development as to how/why the It should raise supply / increase output (1) equivalent to outcome may differ is rewarded. lower cost (1) lower price (1) increasing international competitiveness (1). Generic example mark There may be more funds available to invest (1) raise quality (1) increase exports / reduce imports (1). Tax revenue may decrease… 1 Award up to 4 marks for logical reasons why it might not, ...because of reason e.g. incomes may be 1 which may include: lower. It may increase inefficiency (1) as firms rely on the subsidy (1) may not pass on the benefit of the subsidy to consumers Tax revenue may increase because incomes 0 (1). may be higher i.e. reverse of a previous Nigeria may have a high inflation rate (1) which may offset argument. the cost advantage of the subsidy (1). There may an increase in incomes at home (1) which may Tax revenue may increase because of a 1 increase imports / divert exports to the home market (1). different reason i.e. not the reverse of a There may be a recession abroad / decrease in incomes of previous argument e.g. government spending trading partners (1) which reduces exports (1). on subsidies may stimulate the economy more Lower export prices will not raise export revenue if demand than spending on education. is inelastic (1). The exchange rate may rise (1) increasing export prices / lowering import prices (1). Farmers may import e.g. more machinery (1). There may be adverse weather conditions / disease (1) which reduces quality / quality may remain poor (1). There may be import restrictions / increase in import restrictions imposed by other countries (1). 1(h) Discuss whether or not the US government should 6 A minimum price diagram without explanation can get a impose a minimum price on chocolate. maximum of 2 marks. These marks may be the equivalent of a combination of two of higher price, demand extending, Award up to 4 marks for logical reasons why it should, supply extending or a surplus being created. which may include: It will raise price (1) reduce demand / demand contracts / quantity demand falls / consumption falls. (1) reduce obesity (1). Social cost of eating chocolate may exceed social benefit (1) due to external costs (1) example e.g. cost on health service / may reduce need for government spending on healthcare (1) overconsumption of chocolate (1) move market closer to where social benefit equals social cost (1) increase welfare (1). May raise health of the population / eating chocolate may be unhealthy (1) raise labour productivity (1). There may be information failure (1) some chocolate is a demerit good (1). Award up to 4 marks for logical reasons why it should not, which may include: Poor may not be able to afford chocolate (1) regressive measure (1). Not everyone overweight / some may consume chocolate in quantities that are not harmful (1) may cause demand to switch to other high sugar products / discriminate against other high sugar products (1). It will encourage supply to extend (1) a surplus may develop (1). There may be an illegal market in chocolate (1). There may be a cost to the government (1) it may have to pay to monitor that the price is being charged (1) lower tax revenue from chocolate (1) may be an increase in unemployment (1). 1(h) Demand may be inelastic (1) resulting in a relatively small fall in demand / chocolate may be addictive (1). It depends on how high the minimum price is (1) may have no effect if set below the market equilibrium (1).
3 Germany’s death rate is higher than some other countries, including Sweden, Cuba and the Maldives. Germany’s labour force increased in size between 2011 and 2021 and has become even more productive. The country has also experienced low inflation and a growing surplus on the current account of its balance of payments. (a) Identify two reasons why death rates may vary between countries. [2] (b) Explain two causes of an increase in the size of a country’s labour force. [4] (c) Analyse how an increase in labour productivity in a country can increase a surplus on the current account of its balance of payments. [6] (d) Discuss why some countries may experience lower inflation in the future and some may not. [8]
20 marks
Mark scheme: 3(a) Identify two reasons why death rates may vary between countries. Two from differences in: income / standard of living healthcare education nutrition lifestyles / suicide rates average age spread of Covid / infectious diseases war / conflict natural disasters air pollution / water pollution conditions of work level of crime 2 Do not accept differences in population size as these affect number rather than rate. If more than two reasons are given, consider the first three. 3(b) Explain two causes of an increase in the size of a country’s labour force. Logical explanation which might include: Change in the birth rate (1) rise will mean more people of working age in the long run / fall will enable more parents to be in the labour force (1). Immigration (1) many immigrants are of working age (1). Rise in retirement age (1) people will work for longer (1). Fall in school leaving age (1) people will be in education for a shorter period (1). Fall in the death rate / rise in life expectancy (1) fewer people dying before reaching retirement age (1). Changes in social culture (1) allowing more women to work (1). Increase in size of population of working age (1) reason (1). Rise in wage levels (1) attracts people to re-enter the labour market (1). 4 One mark each for each of two causes identified and one mark each for each of two explanations. Question Answer Marks Guidance 3(c) Analyse how an increase in labour productivity in a country can increase a surplus on the current account of its balance of payments. Coherent analysis which might include: Output per worker (hour) increases (1) may reduce average cost of production (1) lower prices (1) may increase the quality of exports (1). These changes may increase international competitiveness of exports / make exports cheaper (1) demand for exports may increase (1) export revenue may rise (1). Higher relative prices of imports (1) lower relative quality of imports (1) these changes may decrease international competitiveness of imports (1) demand for imports may decrease (1) import expenditure may fall (1). Output increases (1) allowing more exports (1) and less imports (1). 6 Question Answer Marks Guidance 3(d) Discuss why some countries may experience lower inflation in the future and some may not. In assessing each answer, use the table opposite. Why some might: advances in technology may reduce costs of production increases in education and healthcare could raise labour productivity globalisation may increase international competition trade union power may fall, lowering wage increases successful government policy measures e.g. reducing demand Why some might not: consumers may become optimistic and spend more governments may increase their spending the rate of interest may fall total demand may increase raw materials may run out rising cost of energy and rising food prices. 8 Level Description Marks 3 A reasoned discussion which accurately examines both sides of the economic argument, making use of economic information and clear and logical analysis to evaluate economic issues and situations. One side of the argument may have more depth than the other, but overall, both sides of the argument are considered and developed. There is thoughtful evaluation of economic concepts, terminology, information and / or data appropriate to the question. The discussion may also point out the possible uncertainties of alternative decisions and outcomes. 6–8 2 A reasoned discussion which makes use of economic information and clear analysis to evaluate economic issues and situations. The answer may lack some depth and development may be one-sided. There is relevant use of economic concepts, terminology, information and data appropriate to the question. 3–5 1 There is a simple attempt at using economic definitions and terminology. Some reference may be made to economic theory, with occasional understanding. 1–2 0 A mark of zero should be awarded for no creditable content. 0
1 (a) Calculate the number of people who were living in poverty in Guyana in 2020. [1] (b) Identify two causes of the decrease in the output of sugar in 2020. [2] (c) Explain how economic growth is measured. [2] (d) Explain two reasons why labour mobility may increase in Guyana in the future. [4] (e) Draw a demand and supply diagram to show the effect of a decrease in the price of rail transport on the market for car transport. [4] (f) Analyse the relationship between GDP per head and internet access. [5] (g) Discuss whether or not the discovery of oil is likely to increase living standards in Guyana. [6] (h) Discuss whether or not Guyana would benefit from an increase in the size of its population. [6]
30 marks
Mark scheme: 1(a) Calculate the number of people who were living in poverty in Guyana in 2020. 276 500 (1). 1 1(b) Identify two causes of the decrease in the output of sugar in 2020. Bad weather (1) falling (global) demand (1). 2 If more than two causes given, consider the first three. 1(c) Explain how economic growth is measured. Real (1) GDP / national / country’s output / income / expenditure (1). 2 If more than two ways given, consider the first three. Not accepting GDP per head for GDP. 1(d) Explain two reasons why labour mobility may increase in Guyana in the future. Logical explanation which might include: Increased government spending on education / improved education (1) improved skills / productivity / occupational mobility (1). Improved / cheaper rail travel / increased spending on infrastructure / improved infrastructure (1) easier to work further away / increased ability to work in other areas / increased geographical mobility (1). Increased government spending on the internet (1) people learn new skills / gain information about job opportunities / increase occupational mobility (1). May be net immigration (1) migrants may be skilled / may be more willing to move to different areas of the country (1). 4 One mark each for each of two reasons identified and one mark each for each of two explanations. If more than two reasons given, consider the first three. Question Answer Marks Guidance 1(e) Draw a demand and supply diagram to show the effect of a decrease in the price of rail transport on the market for car transport. Demand and supply diagram: Axes correctly labelled – price and quantity or p and q (1). Original demand and supply curves correctly labelled (1). Demand curve shifted to the left (1). Equilibriums – shown by lines P1 and Q1 and P2 and Q2 or equilibrium points marked as E1 and E2 (1). 4 Question Answer Marks Guidance 1(f) Analyse the relationship between GDP per head and internet access. Coherent analysis which might include: Expected relationship: Direct / positive (1) the higher the GDP per head, the higher the internet access (1) Supporting evidence: Up to two marks E.g. Iceland with the highest GDP per head had the highest % of the population with internet access Eritrea with the lowest GDP per head had the least internet access France with the second highest GDP per head has the second highest % of population with internet access Analysis of expected relationship: Higher GDP per head increases household’s ability to pay for internet access / higher internet access may increase productivity/efficiency / increase job opportunities (1) higher GDP per head increases tax revenue, some of which can be spent on the provision of internet access / higher productivity/efficiency could increase wages (1). Exception: Guyana / Morocco (1) Guyana had a higher GDP per head but low internet access (1). Analysis of exception: Internet access is determined by other influences e.g. education levels (1). 5 Responses do not have to be in the format suggested but they should address the expected / normal relationship, offer supporting evidence of that, highlight any exceptions to that, and analyse the overall data. In terms of supporting evidence: no marks for just description of the figures e.g. Brazil had a GDP per head of $8717 and 72% of the population with internet access / Eritrea had a GDP per head of $643 and 2% of population with internet access. France had a GDP of $40 494 and 83% of the population with internet access etc. In terms of supporting evidence one mark maximum for an indirect comparison e.g. Iceland had a GDP per head of $66 945 and 99% population with internet access whereas in Zambia with a GDP per head of $1,305, only 29% of the population had access to the internet. Question Answer Marks Guidance 1(g) Discuss whether or not the discovery of oil is likely to increase living standards in Guyana. Award up to 4 marks for logical reasons why it might, which may include: increase exports (1) increase economic growth / higher national output (1) and raise incomes / increase GDP per head (1) increase purchasing power / able to buy more goods and services / able to buy basic necessities (1) could reduce poverty (1) create jobs / reduce unemployment / increase employment (1) discourage emigration / encourage immigration (1). raise tax revenue (1) allowing the government to spend more on e.g. education and healthcare (1) MNCs may spend on e.g. improving infrastructure / training (1). Award up to 4 marks for logical reasons why it might not, which may include: may create pollution (1) create external costs / damage the environment (1) which will harm people’s health / reduce life expectancy (1) may be poor working conditions in the industry (1) affecting health of workers (1) the foreign MNC may send much of the profit back to its country (1) it may drive domestic oil firms out of business (1) may deplete the country’s oil reserves (1) the foreign MNC may employ workers from its own country (1) global demand for oil may fall /may be overdependence on oil / other countries may impose trade restrictions on oil. (1) 6 3rd bullet point: increase in government spending should be linked to a form of spending that could increase living standards. Apply this example to all questions with the command word DISCUSS (1g, 1h, 2d, 3d, 4d and 5d) Each point may be credited only once, on either side of an argument, but separate development as to how/why the outcome may differ is rewarded. Generic example Mark Tax revenue may decrease … 1 ... because of reason e.g. incomes may be lower. 1 Tax revenue may increase because incomes may be higher i.e. reverse of a previous argument. 0 Tax revenue may increase because of a different reason i.e. not the reverse of a previous argument e.g. government spending on subsidies may stimulate the economy more than spending on education. 1 Question Answer Marks Guidance 1(h) Discuss whether or not Guyana would benefit from an increase in the size of its population. Award up to 4 marks for logical reasons why it might, which may include: population is below the optimum level / move to the optimum level (1), could make better use of resources (1) if rise due to immigration (1) may bring in new ideas / new production methods / new skills / new technology (1) an increase in the size of the labour force (1) if the number of people of working age increases (1) rise in tax revenue (1) allowing the government to spend more on e.g. education and healthcare (1) consumer expenditure may increase (1) total (aggregate) demand may increase (1) output could increase / cause economic growth / increase productive potential (1) dependency ratio could fall (1) Award up to 4 marks for logical reasons why it might not, which may include: larger population could result in pollution / congestion / overcrowding (1) damage the environment / increase external costs (1) if rise due to fall in death rate or rise in the birth rate / increase in young / old population (1), the dependency ratio will increase (1) some of the extra population may be unemployed (1) 6 Question Answer Marks Guidance 1(h) pressure may be put on e.g. housing / welfare payments (1) increasing need for government expenditure (1) there may be inflation (1) population may increase to the extent that there is overpopulation (1) resources may be depleted (more quickly) (1). 6
5 In 2020, Singapore experienced a decrease in both its population size and its labour force. 2020 was a year of great change in a number of Singaporean markets. Some moved from disequilibrium to equilibrium. Despite all these changes, Singapore managed to increase its exports of goods and services. (a) Identify two benefits of a decrease in a country’s population size. [2] (b) Explain how a market moves from disequilibrium to equilibrium. [4] (c) Analyse, using a production possibility curve (PPC) diagram, the effect of a decrease in the size of a country’s labour force on its economy. [6] (d) Discuss whether or not an increase in exports will benefit an economy. [8]
20 marks
Mark scheme: 5(a) Identify two benefits of a decrease in a country’s 2 population size. Two from: • may be fewer dependents • less pressure on resources • less food needed • move population towards the optimum level / reduce overpopulation • reduce overcrowding / more land space • reduce pollution / less negative externalities • lower imports • lower government expenditure (on healthcare/education) • less unemployment / less unemployment benefit • may increase GDP per head. 5(b) Explain how a market moves from disequilibrium to 4 One mark for reference to a change in price. equilibrium. Maximum of 2 marks for diagrams which show initial Logical explanation which might include: disequilibrium and change in price which restores If demand is greater than supply / there is a shortage / equilibrium. excess demand (1) price will rise (1). If supply is greater than demand / there is a surplus / excess supply (1) price will fall (1). Demand will again equal supply / demand would not initially have been equal to supply (1). 5(c) Analyse, using a production possibility curve (PPC) 6 diagram, the effect of a decrease in the size of a country’s labour force on its economy. Up to 4 marks for the diagram: Axes correctly labelled with different outputs (1). Initial curve drawn as a curve/line sloping downward to the axes (1). New curve drawn as a curve/line sloping downward to the axes (1). Shift to the left indicated by arrow or letters (1). Up to 2 marks for coherent analysis which might include: A decrease in the size of the labour force reduces resources / factors of production available (1) this lowers productive capacity / the maximum output that can be produced (1). Note to gain the marks for the curves, these must be drawn to the axes. 5(d) Discuss whether or not an increase in exports will 8 Level Description Marks benefit an economy. 3 A reasoned discussion which accurately 6–8 In assessing each answer, use the table opposite. examines both sides of the economic argument, making use of economic Why it might: information and clear and logical analysis • may increase export revenue, improve the current to evaluate economic issues and account balance situations. One side of the argument may • may increase total demand have more depth than the other, but • may increase investment overall, both sided of the argument are • may increase output / economic growth considered and developed. There is • may reduce unemployment thoughtful evaluation of economic • may increase incomes. concepts, terminology, information and/or data appropriate to the question. The Why it might not: discussion may also point out the • may cause demand-pull inflation possible uncertainties of alternative • opportunity cost of selling more products on the home decisions and outcomes. market 2 A reasoned discussion which makes use 3–5 • may lead to shortages on the home market of economic information and clear • may deplete resources analysis to evaluate economic issues • may push up the exchange rate, reversing the increase and situations. The answer may lack in exports in the long run some depth and development may be • may make the economy more subject to external one-sided. There is relevant use of shocks. economic concepts, terminology, information and data appropriate to the question. 1 There is a simple attempt at using 1–2 economic definitions and terminology. Some reference may be made to economic theory, with occasional understanding. 0 A mark of zero should be awarded for no 0 creditable content.
3 Indonesia operates a mixed economic system. Indonesia’s central bank, Bank Indonesia, aims for stable prices. The country’s price level can be influenced by changes in population size. Indonesia’s population continues to grow but at a slower rate. Many of the country’s industries are growing with particularly fast growth in Indonesian domestic and international air travel. (a) Identify who allocates resources in a mixed economic system. [2] (b) Explain two benefits a firm may gain from an increase in the size of the country’s population. [4] (c) Analyse the reasons why governments aim for stable prices. [6] (d) Discuss whether or not the global economy would benefit from an increase in air travel. [8]
20 marks
Mark scheme: 3(a) Identify who allocates resources in a mixed economic system. Firms / producers (1) the government (1) OR The private sector / private firms (1) the public sector / nationalised firms (1) 3(b) Explain two benefits a firm may gain from an increase in the size of the country’s population. Logical explanation which might include: Higher demand / more consumers / larger market (1) which may increase revenue / profits (1). May increase ability to take advantage of economies of scale (1) lower average cost of production (1). May be higher supply of labour (1) may make it easier to employ workers / reduce wages (1) can increase output / supply (1). 4 One mark each for each of two benefits identified and one mark for each of two explanations. Question Answer Mark Guidance 3(c) Analyse the reasons why governments aim for stable prices. Coherent analysis which might include: Stable prices give consumers confidence to buy (1) prices remain affordable / knowing they can afford it (1). Stable prices attract MNCs (1) leads to greater employment (1) government / firms more able to plan use of resources (1) increases investment (1) and economic growth (1). To avoid inflation (1) which can discourage investment due to less certainty (1) could lead to lower wage demands (1) can make exports more / imports less price competitive (1) which may cause a current account deficit on the balance of payments (1). Inflation can cause a random redistribution of income (1) lenders / savers may lose (1) borrowers may gain (1). Inflation can cause menu costs (1) e.g. the cost of changing prices (1) and may cause shoe leather costs (1) e.g. cost of shopping around for lowest prices (1). To avoid deflation (1) which can result in a downward spiral of demand and prices (1) consumers and firms may delay their purchases (1) this can result in a rise in unemployment (1) and a recession (1). 6 Question Answer Mark Guidance 3(d) Discuss whether or not the global economy would benefit from an increase in air travel. In assessing each answer, use the table opposite. Why it might: may increase employment in the air travel industry may increase employment and output in related industries e.g. tourism may reduce firms’ costs of production if quicker than other forms of transport may increase mobility of labour air travel is a safer form of travel than e.g. road travel encourages tourism and economic development of some countries. Why it might not: may cause noise and air pollution (carbon footprint) may contribute to climate change may need to build new airports / extend existing airports which may reduce land available for e.g. housing. may reduce demand for other forms of transport unemployment may increase in e.g. sea travel high costs prevent movement of heavy goods. 8 See Guidance table at the end of the mark scheme.
1 (a) Calculate the percentage of the Jordanian labour force employed in the secondary sector. [1] (b) Identify two components of the current account of Jordan’s balance of payments. [2] (c) Explain the main type of unemployment experienced by Jordan in 2020. [2] (d) Explain two advantages the Jordanian economy may gain from the mergers between its tourism firms. [4] (e) Analyse the relationship between birth rate and average age. [4] (f) Analyse, using a demand and supply diagram, how an increase in population size will affect the market for clothing. [5] (g) Discuss whether or not the Jordanian government should spend more on renewable energy. [6] (h) Discuss whether or not the Jordanian central bank should have raised the rate of interest in 2021. [6]
30 marks
Mark scheme: Question Answer Marks Guidance 1(a) Calculate the percentage of the Jordanian labour force 1 Accept 19. employed in the secondary sector. 19% (1). 1(b) Identify two components of the current account of 2 If more than two suggested components are given, consider Jordan’s balance of payments. the first three. Trade in services (1) primary income (1). Accept invisibles for trade in services. 1(c) Explain the main type of unemployment experienced by 2 Faill in demand is not sufficient here for fall in total demand Jordan in 2020. as total demand is given in the source material – must be macro. Cyclical unemployment (1) lower total demand / fall in employment in most industries / number of workers greater Accept ‘demand deficient unemployment for cyclical than the number of jobs available (1). unemployment. 1(d) Explain two advantages the Jordanian economy may 4 One mark each for each of two advantages identified and gain from the mergers between its tourism firms. one mark for each of two explanations. Logical explanation which might include: Lower prices may be linked to either ‘raise output’ etc. or Lower prices (1) may raise output/GDP/employment/living ‘raise exports’ etc. standards / may be the result of taking advantage of Similarly higher quality may be linked to ‘raise exports etc.’ economies of scale (1). or ‘raise output etc.’. Higher quality (1) may raise exports / reduce current account deficit / increase international competitiveness / increase tourism revenue / more foreign currency / may be the result of sharing ideas (1). 1(e) Analyse the relationship between birth rate and average 4 Responses do not have to be in the format suggested but age. they should address the expected/normal relationship, offer supporting evidence of that, highlight any exceptions to that, Coherent analysis which might include: and analyse the overall data. Expected relationship (up to 2 marks): Accept analysis based on how differences in the average of Countries with a low birth rate are likely to have a high population may affect the birth rate. average age (1) an inverse relationship / negative relationship / move in opposite directions (1). For supporting evidence and the second ‘exception’ mark, comparisons must be made. No marks for just stating the Supporting evidence (up to 2 marks): birth rate and average age figures. Four countries with the lowest birth rates had the highest average age (1) Monaco had the lowest birth rate and the highest average age (1) Niger with the highest birth rate has the lowest average age (1) e.g. Germany has a lower birth rate and a higher average age than Jordan (1). Analysis of expected relationship (up to 2 marks): A low birth rate would mean that children would form a small proportion of the population / a high birth rate may mean children would form a high proportion of the population / it would increase the proportion of people aged over 65 (1). A high birth rate may indicate low living standards / lower income which may be associated with low life expectancy (1). A high average age may mean that there are fewer people of child-bearing age (1). Exception (up to 2 marks): Venezuela or Maldives (1) Maldives had a lower birth rate than Venezuela but the same average age (1). Analysis of exception (up to 1 mark): The average age of a country’s population is also influenced by the death rate and net migration (1). 1(f) Analyse, using a demand and supply diagram, how an 5 increase in population size will affect the market for clothing. Coherent analysis which might include: D&S diagram: Axes correctly labelled – price and quantity or p and q (1). Original demand and supply curves correctly labelled (1). New demand curve shifted to the right (1). Equilibriums – shown by lines P1 and Q1 and P2 and Q2 or equilibrium points marked as E1 and E2 (1). Written analysis: An increase in population size will increase the number of consumers / increase demand for clothes / price increases (1). 1(g) Discuss whether or not the Jordanian government 6 Apply this example to all questions with the command should spend more on renewable energy. word DISCUSS (1g, 1h, 2d, 3d, 4d and 5d) Award up to 4 marks for logical reasons why it should, which may include: Each point may be credited only once, on either side of an • need for more energy due to an increase in population argument, but separate development as to how/why the (1) non-renewable sources of energy will run out / outcome may differ is rewarded. reduced dependency on fossil fuels (1) may reduce import bills (1) Generic example mark • would reduce environmental damage (1) reduce external costs (1) lower pollution (1) reduce extent of Tax revenue may decrease… 1 climate change / global warming / promote sustainable development (1) improve health (1). ...because of reason e.g. incomes may be 1 • cheaper in the longer run (1) solar and wind power are lower. free goods (1) lower costs of production (1) reduce household bills (1). Tax revenue may increase because incomes 0 may be higher i.e. reverse of a previous Award up to 4 marks for logical reasons why it should not, argument. which may include: • expensive to build (1) opportunity cost (1) example (1) Tax revenue may increase because of a 1 • relies on weather (1) supplies may be disrupted / different reason i.e. not the reverse of a insufficient / unreliable (1) previous argument e.g. government spending • cost of renewable energy projects may increase with on subsidies may stimulate the economy more high interest than spending on education. • rates (1) may be funded by borrowing (1) may increase taxes (1) • may cause visual pollution (1) e.g. wind turbines (1). 1(h) Discuss whether or not the Jordanian central bank 6 Some points e.g. discouraged spending may be considered should have raised the rate of interest in 2021. from either side but see guidance table on 1f. Award up to 4 marks for logical reasons why it should have, which may include: • total demand predicted to increase / may have reduced total demand (1) encouraged saving (1) discouraged spending / borrowing (1) lowered demand-pull (1) inflation (1) reduced imports (1) • may have attracted more funds for the Jordanian government to borrow / use (1) for e.g. renewable energy projects (1). Award up to 4 marks for logical reasons why it should not have, which may include: • cost of government borrowing would have increased / may have difficulty paying off government debt (1) • investment may have been discouraged (1) lowered economic growth (1) reduced growth in employment / caused unemployment (1) • may have increased the exchange rate (1) foreigners depositing money in the country’s banks / attracted hot money flow (1) raised export prices / lowered import prices / decreased exports / increased imports (1) reduced tourism (1) increased the current account deficit (1).
2 The shape of Colombia’s population pyramid is changing. The income distribution of this South American country, however, is not changing significantly. The country has one of the most unequal income distributions in the world. Some Colombians work in its footwear industry which produces shoes, sandals and boots. Although footwear is produced in the private sector, Colombia has a mixed economic system. (a) Define population pyramid. [2] (b) Explain two reasons why income may become more unevenly distributed. [4] (c) Analyse the influences on whether demand for shoes is elastic or inelastic. [6] (d) Discuss whether or not a mixed economic system will benefit the people who live in that economy. [8]
20 marks
Mark scheme: 2(a) Define population pyramid. 2 If more than two factors given, consider the first three. age (1) gender (1) 2(b) Explain two reasons why income may become more 4 One mark each for each of two reasons identified and one unevenly distributed. mark each for each of two explanations. Logical explanation which might include: If more than two reasons given, consider the first three. A rise in: MAX of two marks if not identifying what changes. • Unemployment (1) those who lose their jobs are likely to experience a fall in their income (1). • Illness (1) the sick may not be able to earn an income (1). • Profits (1) benefitting entrepreneurs (1). • Interest rates (1) benefitting those with a high value of savings (1). • Wealth (1) with rich people gaining more interest/profit (1). • Regressive taxation (1) reducing the income of the poor/placing greater burden on poor (1). • Discrimination of workers (1) example e.g. reducing income of women • Education provision / attainment (1) but only for some (1). A fall in: • National minimum wage (1) the low-paid experience a fall in income (1). • Progressive taxation (1) increases the income of the rich (1). • Welfare / state benefits (1) reduce the income of the poor (1). 2(b) Growth: 4 • Economic growth (1) benefits go more to skilled than to unskilled workers (1). • Changes in growth rate of different industries (1). workers in expanding industries may earn more in wages than workers in declining industries (1). • Changes in growth rate of different regions (1) workers in high growth areas may earn higher wages than in low growth / declining regions (1). • Changes in growth rate of private and public sector (1) private sector earn higher increase in wages (1). 2(c) Analyse the influences on whether demand for shoes is 6 elastic or inelastic. Coherent analysis which might include: • Shoes have substitutes in the form of sandals and boots (1) may make demand (price) elastic (1) as a change in price will cause consumers to switch between different forms of footwear (1) especially if the types are close substitutes / close in price (1). • PED of particular brands of shoes will be more elastic than demand for shoes as a whole (1) • Proportion of income spent on the shoes (1) the lower the proportion, the more inelastic the demand (1) as a change in price will not have such a significant impact on demand (1). • Whether shoes are considered to be a necessity or a luxury (1) shoes are likely to be considered a necessity (1) and therefore inelastic (1). • It may not be possible to delay the purchase of shoes (1) making demand inelastic (1). • Durability of shoes (1) the more durable the more inelastic (1). • Demand for some shoe may be addictive (1) making demand inelastic (1). 2(d) Discuss whether or not a mixed economic system will 8 Level Description Marks benefit the people who live in that economy. 3 A reasoned discussion which 6–8 In assessing each answer, use the table opposite. accurately examines both sides of the economic argument, making use of Why it might: economic information and clear and • public goods may be provided logical analysis to evaluate economic • production of demerit goods may be discouraged issues and situations. One side of the • production of merit goods may be encouraged argument may have more depth than • state benefits may be provided the other, but overall both sides of the • income may be redistributed to help the poor argument are considered and • unemployment may be kept low by government policies developed. There is thoughtful • private sector benefits e.g. generate high incomes / evaluation of economic concepts, lower prices. terminology, information and/or data appropriate to the question. The Why it might not: discussion may also point out the • may be market failure in the private sector possible uncertainties of alternative • rich may lose if there is high progressive taxation decisions and outcomes. • high taxation may discourage enterprise • state-owned enterprises may be inefficient 2 A reasoned discussion which makes 3–5 • may be less choice in the public sector. use of economic information and clear analysis to evaluate economic issues and situations. The answer may lack some depth and development may be one-sided. There is relevant use of economic concepts, terminology, information and data appropriate to the question. 2(d) 8 Level Description Marks 1 There is a simple attempt at using 1–2 economic definitions and terminology. Some reference may be made to economic theory, with occasional understanding. 0 A mark of zero should be awarded for 0 no creditable content.
4 In 2023, India became the country with the largest population. This may affect the government’s macroeconomic aims. In 2018, the Indian Government cut the country’s corporation (corporate income) tax rate from 35% to 25%. Between 2019 and 2022, India’s inflation rate averaged 6%. Some economists suggested that to achieve its central inflation rate target, the government should cut its spending. (a) Identify two macroeconomic aims of government that may conflict. [2] (b) Explain two reasons why a country may have a high population growth rate. [4] (c) Analyse how a cut in the corporation (corporate income) tax rate can increase economic growth. [6] (d) Discuss whether or not a decrease in government spending will reduce inflation. [8]
20 marks
Mark scheme: 4(a) Identify two macroeconomic aims of government that 2 If more than two macroeconomic aims given, consider the may conflict. first three. • Full employment / low unemployment (1) and price Allow any macroeconomic aim. stability (1). • Economic growth (1) current account balance (1). • Price stability (1) redistribution of income / poverty reduction (1). • Economic growth (1) economic sustainability (1). 4(b) Explain two reasons why a country may have a high 4 One mark each for each of two reasons identified and one population growth rate. mark each for each of two explanations. Logical explanation which might include: If more than two reasons given, consider the first three. • High birth rate (1) due to e.g. low age of marriage / lack of education on birth control (1). • Low death rate / high life expectancy (1) due to e.g. good quality healthcare (1). • Immigration /net immigration (1) due to e.g. high incomes (1). • High fertility rates (1) due to e.g. young female population (1). • Birth rate higher than the death rate (1) results in higher natural growth rate (1). 4(c) Analyse how a cut in the corporation (corporate income) 6 Do not credit answers that refer to income tax or any other tax rate can increase economic growth. tax than corporation tax. Coherent analysis which might include: • Cut in corporation (corporate income) tax will increase the amount of profits that can be kept by firms (1) may attract MNCs to country (1) this will increase the funds firms have to spend (1) on capital goods (1) and increase incentive to invest (1) more to spend on wages (1) may create job opportunities / reduce unemployment (1) raise consumer expenditure (1) firms grow faster (1). • Higher investment (1) will increase total demand (1). It may also increase the quality of capital goods (1) may introduce new technology (1) may increase productivity /productive capacity (1) increase output / GDP (1). • Provide an incentive to enterprise (1) as more profits can be retained / higher profits (1). 4(d) Discuss whether or not a decrease in government 8 Level Description Marks spending will reduce inflation. 3 A reasoned discussion which accurately 6–8 In assessing each answer, use the table opposite. examines both sides of the economic argument, making use of economic Why it might: information and clear and logical • may reduce total demand analysis to evaluate economic issues • lower total demand may reduce demand-pull inflation and situations. One side of the • if near full employment, lower demand may have a argument may have more depth than significant impact on inflation the other, but overall both sides of the • may reduce need for taxes, lower indirect taxes may argument are considered and reduce prices. developed. There is thoughtful evaluation of economic concepts, Why it might not: terminology, information and/or data • lower government subsidies may raise prices appropriate to the question. The • lower government spending on education and training discussion may also point out the may reduce productivity and may increase cost of possible uncertainties of alternative production decisions and outcomes. • lower government spending on infrastructure could increase transport costs 2 A reasoned discussion which makes 3–5 • higher costs of production may increase cost-push use of economic information and clear inflation analysis to evaluate economic issues • may be other causes of inflation e.g. rise in wages. and situations. The answer may lack some depth and development may be one-sided. There is relevant use of economic concepts, terminology, information and data appropriate to the question. 4(d) 8 Level Description Marks 1 There is a simple attempt at using 1–2 economic definitions and terminology. Some reference may be made to economic theory, with occasional understanding. 0 A mark of zero should be awarded for 0 no creditable content.
1 (a) Calculate foreign workers as a percentage of Japan’s labour force in 2022. [1] (b) Identify two reasons why Japan has a high average age of population. [2] (c) Explain why some young Japanese people emigrate. [2] (d) Explain two ways Japan could attract more foreign workers. [4] (e) Draw a demand and supply diagram to show the effect of a decrease in population on the market for furniture. [4] (f) Analyse the relationship between global GDP per head and global air passenger numbers. [5] (g) Discuss whether or not a high savings rate is likely to benefit Japan. [6] (h) Discuss whether or not labour mobility in Japan is likely to increase in the future. [6]
30 marks
Mark scheme: Question Answer Marks Guidance 1(a) Calculate foreign workers as a percentage of Japan’s 1 Accept 2.5 without %. labour force in 2022. 2.5% (1). 1(b) Identify two reasons why Japan has a high average age 2 If more than two reasons are given, consider the first three. of population. Low birth rate (1) high life expectancy (1) good healthcare (1) young adults moving abroad (1). 1(c) Explain why some young Japanese people emigrate. 2 One mark for identification and one mark for explanation. To gain high wages (1) enjoy a better living standard / able to purchase more goods and services (1). 1(d) Explain two ways Japan could attract more foreign 4 One mark each for two ways identified and one mark each workers. for two explanations. Logical explanation which might include: If more than two ways are given, consider the first three. Only the 3 listed identifications can be credited, and • remove the Japanese language test (1) more foreigners explanation marks can only be awarded if applied to a valid would be able to work in the country (1) identification. • allow foreign workers to bring their families with them (1) foreign workers are more likely to settle in the country if they are not separated from their families (1) • allow unskilled workers to stay for more than five years (1) if gain high wages / enjoy living in the country would not want to leave / attract workers who want to live permanently in the country / give workers the opportunity to stay permanently / increase international mobility of labour (1). 1(e) Draw a demand and supply diagram to show the effect 4 of a decrease in population on the market for furniture. Coherent analysis which might include the following. D&S diagram: Axes correctly labelled – price and quantity or p and q (1). Original demand and supply curves correctly labelled (1). New demand curve shifted to the left (1). OR New supply curve shifted to the left (1). OR New demand curve shifted to the left AND new supply curve shifted to the left. Equilibriums – shown by lines P1 and Q1 and P2 and Q2 or equilibrium points marked as E1 and E2 (1). 1(f) Analyse the relationship between global GDP per head 5 Responses do not have to be in the format suggested but and global air passenger numbers. they should address the expected / normal relationship, offer supporting evidence of that, highlight any exceptions to that, Coherent analysis which might include the following. and analyse the overall data. Expected relationship: Supporting evidence should involve interpretation, not just Generally, a positive relationship (1) the higher the global description. GDP head, the higher the air passenger numbers (1). Supporting evidence: 2016–2019 GDP per head rose and air passenger numbers increased (1). Analysis of expected relationship: Higher GDP per head increases purchasing power / ability to pay for air travel (1) as people get richer, they travel more for leisure and business (1). Exception: 2021 (1) GDP per head rose but air passenger numbers decreased (1). Analysis of exception: May have been a time delay in people gaining confidence in flying after COVID-19 pandemic / other influences on demand e.g. air fares (1). 1(g) Discuss whether or not a high savings rate is likely to 6 Reference to AD / total demand falling can be credited on benefit Japan. either side of the argument, but only once. Award up to 4 marks for logical reasons why it might, which Apply this example to all questions with the command may include: word DISCUSS (1g, 1h, 2d, 3d, 4d and 5d) • may keep inflation low (1) as spending will not be high (1) reduce (total) demand (1) reduce demand-pull Each point may be credited only once, on either side of an inflation (1) argument, but separate development as to how / why the • may reduce imports (1) improve the current account of outcome may differ is rewarded. the balance of payments (1) • provide finance for investment (1) firms able to borrow Generic example mark from banks (1) • may enable households to finance future expenditure Tax revenue may decrease… 1 (1) on e.g. healthcare / education / provide for retirement / provide support for individuals in difficult ...because of reason e.g. incomes may be lower. 1 times (1) • may enable government to cut benefits, e.g. pensions Tax revenue may increase because incomes 0 (1) spend money saved on other priorities, e.g. may be higher i.e. reverse of a previous healthcare (1). argument. Award up to 4 marks for logical reasons why it might not, Tax revenue may increase because of a different 1 which may include: reason i.e. not the reverse of a previous argument e.g. government spending on subsidies • may lower total demand (1) reduce GDP (1) increase may stimulate the economy more than spending unemployment (1) cyclical unemployment (1) could on education. cause a recession (1) • may reduce investment as demand is low (1) reduce improvements in technology (1) • Less indirect tax raised (1) may lead to reduced government spending (1). 1(h) Discuss whether or not labour mobility in Japan is likely 6 Reference to occupational and geographical mobility can be to increase in the future. credited on either side of the argument, but only once. Award up to 4 marks for logical reasons why it might, which Reference to falling house prices or improved transport must may include: be linked to improved mobility for credit and vice versa. • Improvements in education and training (1) could increase skills / qualifications (1) increase occupational mobility (1) • Improvements in transport / subsidised travel (1) could enable people to move to different areas (1) raise geographical mobility (1). Award up to 4 marks for logical reasons why it might not, which may include: • Ageing population (1) may have out-of-date skills (1) more difficult to change jobs (1) reduce occupational mobility (1) may be more reluctant to move to a different area (1) reason (1) reduce geographical mobility (1) • House prices may rise (1) making it difficult to move from areas with low house prices to areas with high prices (1).