Fiscal policy — Paper 2 — IGCSE Economics (9-1) 0987 topical questions

Question 1

(a) Calculate Vietnam’s GDP per head in 2017. [1] (b) Identify two rewards to factors of production. [2] (c) Explain what happened to Vietn…

Accepted Answer

Question Answer Marks 1(a) Calculate Vietnam’s GDP per head in 2017. 1 $6900 (1). 1(b) Identify two rewards to factors of production. 2 Wages (1) profits (1). 1(c) Explain what happened to Vietnam’s foreign exchange rate between 2 2010 and 2017. Logical explanation which might include: It fell/depreciated (1) more dong had to be given to buy one dollar (1). 1(d) Explain two benefits an economy may gain from having a young 4 labour force. Logical explanation which might include: May be more flexible (1) switch from doing different tasks (1). May be more mobile (1) able to switch from one job to another or from one place to another place (1). May be more up to date with advances in technology (1) more productive/able to use advanced technology (1). 1(e) Analyse why Vietnam’s budget deficit may decline in the future. 4 Coherent analysis which might include: High economic growth will raise incomes/wages rising (1) higher profits (1) more revenue from direct taxes (1) higher incomes is likely to result in more spending (1) more revenue from indirect taxes (1). Tax rates may be increased (1) reducing the gap between tax revenue and government spending (1). Deregulation / privatisation may increase profits (1) resulting in higher revenue from direct taxes /corporation tax (1). 1(f) Analyse the relationship between government spending on education 5 and the percentage of the labour force employed in the tertiary sector. Coherent analysis which might include: Generally the countries with the highest % spending on education have the highest percentage employed in the tertiary sector and vice versa (1) up to two examples e.g. Norway has the highest % spending and the highest % employed in the tertiary sector, Bangladesh has the lowest % spending and the lowest % employed in the tertiary sector (2) the main exception is Vietnam – second highest % spending but lowest % employed in the tertiary sector (1) there may be a time lag in this case (1). It is the expected relationship as some tertiary jobs require high skills (1) countries that can afford to devote a high percentage of resources to education may have achieved a relatively high level of development (1) a higher percent spent will create jobs in education (1). 1(g) Discuss whether or not an increase in competition is likely to benefit 6 Vietnamese consumers. Apply this example to all questions with the command word DISCUSS (1g, 1h, 2d, 3d, 4d and 5d) Each point may be credited only once, on either side of an argument, but separate development as to how/why the outcome may differ is rewarded. Generic example mark Tax revenue may decrease… 1 ...because of reason e.g. incomes may be lower. 1 Tax revenue may increase because incomes may be higher i.e. 0 reverse of a previous argument. Tax revenue may increase because of a different reason i.e. not the reverse of a previous argument e.g. government spending on 1 subsidies may stimulate the economy more than spending on education. Award up to 4 marks for logical reasons why it might, which may include: • prices may be reduced to attract more consumers (1) making them more affordable to consumers (1) • choice will be increased in terms of sellers (1) and possibly in terms of a greater range of products (1) • quality may rise (1) with pressure being put on producers to produce good products to attract consumers (1) • producers may respond more fully to changes in consumer demand (1) Award up to 4 marks for logical reasons why it might not, which may include: • firms may be smaller (1), less able to take advantage of economies of scale (1), so prices may be higher (1) • firms may have less profit (1) and so spend less improving the quality of the product (1) • some firms may be MNCs (1), less concerned about causing external costs (1) 1(h) Discuss whether or not the increase in borrowing is likely to have 6 caused inflation in Vietnam in 2017. Award up to 4 marks for logical reasons why it might, which may include: • higher consumer demand (1) and investment (1) will increase total (aggregate) demand (1) • higher total demand may cause demand-pull inflation/cause producers to raise prices (1) • government spending may rise, further adding to total (aggregate) demand (1) • the economy has very low unemployment/full employment (1) making it difficult for supply to respond to higher demand (1) • tax rates may rise (1) which may increase costs of production (1) causing cost-push inflation (1) Award up to 4 marks for logical reasons why it might not, which may include: • higher investment may reduce costs of production (1) lowering cost- push inflation (1) • higher consumer spending may enable firms to grow (1) and take greater advantage of economies of scale (1) • increased education (1) may raise labour productivity (1), reduce costs of production (1) and lower cost-push inflation (1) • privatised firms may be more efficient (1) • more competition may reduce price rises (1)

Question 2

Economists are uncertain about the future United States (US) macroeconomic performance. For instance, in recent years, US unemployment has …

Accepted Answer

4(a) Define macroeconomics. 2 The study of the whole economy (2). Example of a macroeconomic topic e.g. unemployment/study of economics on a large scale (1). 4(b) Explain two consequences to firms of unemployment. 4 Logical explanation which might include: Lower demand (1) lower revenue (1). Lower ability to take advantage of economies of scale (1) due to lower output (1). Lower average costs (1) lower wages (1). Less risk of industrial action (1) workers afraid of losing their jobs (1). Greater ease of recruiting workers (1) reducing recruitment costs (1). 4(c) Analyse how tax cuts could increase exports. 6 Coherent analysis which might include: Lower indirect taxes could reduce costs of production (1) could encourage investment (1) use of more advanced technology/more efficient methods of production (1) which could lower prices / make prices more internationally competitive (1). Lower income tax could motivate workers (1) raise productivity (1) lower price of exports (1) raise quality of exports (1). Lower taxes in other countries (1) e.g. a lower tariff will encourage foreigners to purchase more exports (1). 4(d) Discuss whether or not a current account deficit on its balance of 8 payments harms an economy. In assessing each answer, use the table below. Level Description Marks 3 A reasoned discussion which accurately examines both 6–8 sides of the economic argument, making use of economic information and clear and logical analysis to evaluate economic issues and situations. One side of the argument may have more depth than the other but, overall, both sides of the argument are considered and developed. There is thoughtful evaluation of economic concepts, terminology, information and/or data appropriate to the question. The discussion may also point out the possible uncertainties of alternative decisions and outcomes. 2 A reasoned discussion which makes use of economic 3–5 information and clear analysis to evaluate economic issues and situations. The answer may lack some depth and development may be one-sided. There is relevant use of economic concepts, terminology, information and data appropriate to the question. 1 There is a simple attempt at using economic definitions 1–2 and terminology. Some reference may be made to economic theory, with occasional understanding. 0 A mark of zero should be awarded for no creditable 0 content. Why it might: • income/demand is leaving the economy • employment will be lower than it could be • it may put downward pressure on the exchange rate • the country will get into debt • other countries may not be willing to lend to it / invest in the country. Why it might not: • deficit may be low / short term • enables the country to consume more than it produces • imports of raw materials and capital goods will increase output in the future.

Question 3

In 2017, the Japanese government announced improvements to its tax system. The amount of tax raised is influenced by the size and age distr…

Accepted Answer

4(a) State two qualities of a good tax. 2 One mark each for two from: convenient, equitable, certain, efficient, flexible. 4(b) Explain two causes of a decrease in the death rate. 4 Logical explanation which might include: Rises in income (1) leading to better living standards (1). Better education (1) resulting in e.g. better nutrition (1). Better healthcare (1) due to e.g. advances in medical technology (1). Reduction in crime/end of a war (1) fewer people dying violently (1). 4(c) Analyse, using a production possibility curve (PPC) diagram, the effect 6 of a decrease in population size on an economy. Up to 4 marks for the diagram: Axes correctly drawn (1). Initial curve drawn as a curve / line sloping downward to the axes (1). New curve drawn as a curve / line sloping downward to the axes (1). Shift to the left indicated by arrow or letter (1). Up to 2 marks for coherent analysis which might include: A decrease in population size may decrease the size of the labour force (1) decrease productive capacity (1). 4(d) Discuss whether or not an ageing population is a benefit to an 8 economy. In assessing each answer, use the table below. Level Description Marks 3 A reasoned discussion which accurately examines both 6–8 sides of the economic argument, making use of economic information and clear and logical analysis to evaluate economic issues and situations. One side of the argument may have more depth than the other but, overall, both sides of the argument are considered and developed. There is thoughtful evaluation of economic concepts, terminology, information and/or data appropriate to the question. The discussion may also point out the possible uncertainties of alternative decisions and outcomes. 2 A reasoned discussion which makes use of economic 3–5 information and clear analysis to evaluate economic issues and situations. The answer may lack some depth and development may be one-sided. There is relevant use of economic concepts, terminology, information and data appropriate to the question. 1 There is a simple attempt at using economic definitions 1–2 and terminology. Some reference may be made to economic theory, with occasional understanding. 0 A mark of zero should be awarded for no creditable 0 content. Why it might: • older people may be an economic asset through their knowledge and experience • the retirement age may be raised so that the labour force may increase • in some countries, an increase in the average age of the population may mean more people are in the labour force and may reduce the dependency ratio • may indicate a good standard of living increasing life expectancy. Why it might not: • may be an increase in the dependency ratio with a smaller proportion of workers to support a higher proportion of retired • any increased spending on healthcare and pensions will involve an opportunity cost • taxes may have to be increased to finance increased costs of healthcare and pensions • any shortage of workers may drive up wages and cause cost-push inflation • older workers may not be up to date with new technology and new ideas

Question 4

Mali is a low income and low productivity country in Africa. Its government is using fiscal policy to reduce poverty. The country’s main in…

Accepted Answer

5(a) State two key questions about how resources are allocated. 2 One mark each for two from: What to produce, how to produce it, for whom / who gets what is produced. 5(b) Explain two fiscal policy measures that can be used to reduce poverty. 4 Logical explanation which might include: Rise in government spending on education (1) make it easier for people to gain jobs / better paid jobs (1). Rise in government spending on healthcare (1) providing a basic necessity / increase productivity of workers (1). Subsidise / free provision of food (1) providing a basic necessity / reduce absolute poverty (1). Subsidise / free provision of housing (1) helping those unable to afford housing (1). Increase in state benefits (1) e.g. paying more in unemployment benefit will raise the income of some of the poor (1). Use of progressive taxes / reduction of regressive taxes (1) reduce relative poverty (1). 5(c) Analyse why a country may have low productivity. 6 Coherent analysis which might include: Education may be low (1) and training may be low (1) workers may lack skills (1). Wages may be low (1) working conditions may be poor (1) reducing the motivation of workers (1). There may a lack of investment (1) workers working with out of date/low quality capital goods (1). Healthcare may be low (1) causing workers to be tired (1). 5(d) Discuss whether or not mergers benefit an economy. 8 In assessing each answer, use the table below. Level Description Marks 3 A reasoned discussion which accurately examines both 6–8 sides of the economic argument, making use of economic information and clear and logical analysis to evaluate economic issues and situations. One side of the argument may have more depth than the other but, overall, both sides of the argument are considered and developed. There is thoughtful evaluation of economic concepts, terminology, information and/or data appropriate to the question. The discussion may also point out the possible uncertainties of alternative decisions and outcomes. 2 A reasoned discussion which makes use of economic 3–5 information and clear analysis to evaluate economic issues and situations. The answer may lack some depth and development may be one-sided. There is relevant use of economic concepts, terminology, information and data appropriate to the question. 1 There is a simple attempt at using economic definitions 1–2 and terminology. Some reference may be made to economic theory, with occasional understanding. 0 A mark of zero should be awarded for no creditable 0 content. Why they might: • may enable the new firm to take greater advantage of economies of scale, lower average cost and lower prices, resulting in lower inflation • may enable the new firm to earn higher profits and spend more on research and development and investment. This could raise the quality of products and increase economic growth • may enable the new firm to compete more effectively internationally which could improve the current account position • a vertical merger can increase the efficiency of production by co- ordinating the production stages. This could increase productive potential. Why they might not: • the new firm may experience diseconomies of scale, higher average cost and higher prices. This may increase the inflation rate • a horizontal merger will reduce competition which can increase prices, reduce choice, lower efficiency and reduce quality. This may reduce international price competitiveness which may harm the country’s current account position. It could also lower the country’s economic growth rate • the new firm may rationalise and this may result in unemployment.

Question 5

Mexico has a history of trade deficits. The government is moving the economy closer to free trade, to try to improve its macroeconomic perf…

Accepted Answer

2(a) Define trade in goods balance. Value of exports of goods / revenue earned from exports minus value of imports of goods / expenditure on imports of goods (2). Exports minus imports (1) of goods / visible items (1). 2 Accept exports (of goods) = imports of (goods) for 1 mark 2(b) Explain two benefits producers may gain from free trade. Logical explanation which might include: Availability of larger/global market (1) may increase revenue/profit (1). Ability to produce on a larger scale / higher output (1) take advantage of economies of scale (1) specialise (1). Access to cheaper / better quality raw materials / raw materials without tariffs imposed on them (1) lowering costs of production/raising quality of products produced/lowering price (1). Access to advanced technology/ideas from abroad (1) resulting in improved methods of production/new products (1). Increased competitive pressure (1) which may raise efficiency (1). 4 One mark for each of two benefits identified and one mark for each of two explanations. Question Answer Marks Guidance 2(c) Analyse, using a production possibility curve (PPC) diagram, the effect of an increase in unemployment on an economy. Up to 4 marks for the diagram: Axes correctly labelled (1). Curve drawn as a curve or downward sloping line to the axes (1). Two production points shown – one on or to left of PPC and the other further to the left of the PPC (1). Movement of the production point inwards indicated by arrow or lettering (1). Up to 2 marks for coherent analysis which might include: Unemployment means resources are not used (1) there is inefficiency (1) reduces output/GDP / causes a recession (1). 6 For analysis, only accept a PPC shifted inwards if logical justification is given i.e. an increase in unemployment may cause some workers to leave the labour force – ‘unemployment causing unemployment’. capital goods O consumer goods A B Question Answer Marks Guidance 2(d) Discuss whether or not an increase in the rate of income tax will reduce inflation. In assessing each answer, use the table opposite. Why it might: • reduce disposable income/purchasing power • consumer expenditure likely to fall • investment may fall • total (aggregate) demand may fall • demand-pull inflation may decrease • higher government revenue may increase government spending on supply-side policy measures. Why it might not: • workers may seek higher wages • higher wages may increase costs of production • cost-push inflation/wage-price spiral may occur • higher tax revenue may increase government spending • higher government spending may offset lower consumer expenditure leaving total (aggregate) demand unchanged • people may be very confident about the future so they cut back on savings rather than spending. 8 Level Descriptors Mark 3 A reasoned discussion which accurately examines both sides of the economic argument, making use of economic information and clear and logical analysis to evaluate economic issues and situations. One side of the argument may have more depth than the other, but overall both sides of the argument are considered and developed. There is thoughtful evaluation of economic concepts, terminology, information and/or data appropriate to the question. The discussion may also point out the possible uncertainties of alternative decisions and outcomes. 6–8 2 A reasoned discussion which makes use of economic information and clear analysis to evaluate economic issues and situations. The answer may lack some depth and development or may be one-sided. There is relevant use of economic concepts, terminology, information and data appropriate to the question. 3–5 1 There is a simple attempt at using economic definitions and terminology. Some reference may be made to economic theory, with occasional understanding. 1–2 0 A mark of zero should be awarded for no creditable content. 0 Question Answer Marks Guidance 2(d) Example of L3 answer: Due to an increase in the rate of income tax, inflation may fall as disposable income will fall. People will have less money to spend so they may spend less and total demand will fall. A fall in demand will cause prices to fall as producers will not be able to sell as many goods and services. They will want to keep their market share. Demand-pull inflation will decrease. However, an increase in income tax may not cause inflation to fall. Workers may force up the wage rate. Firms’ labour cost and costs of production will increase so firms may push up prices to maintain profits. This can cause cost-push inflation and a wage price spiral. Plus, government revenue from high taxes will rise and government spending may rise. This may offset the fall in consumer expenditure and inflation may not fall. Principal Examiner comment: Strong on both sides. Example of L1 answer: Inflation refers to the fall in the purchasing power of money. Income tax is a payment to the government. The increase in direct tax will definitely help the government. This may help the government solve the problem of inflation and will increase the purchasing power of money. Principal Examiner comment: Definitions given but the answer does not explain why inflation may, or may not, be reduced.

Question 6

The population of Hungary is the most obese in Europe. Hungarians eat fewer vegetables than most Europeans and more food types that may be …

Accepted Answer

3(a) Define demerit good. A product which is more harmful to consumers than they realise / the government considers is more harmful (2). It is over-consumed / overproduced (1) it creates external costs (1). A product that is harmful (1). 3(b) Explain the difference between an extension in demand and an increase in demand. Logical explanation which might include: An extension in demand is caused by a change in the price of the product (1) rise in quantity demanded (1) it is shown by a movement along the demand curve (1). An increase in demand is caused by a change in an influence on demand other than a change in the price of the product / means more is demanded at each and every price (1) example of a cause of an increase in demand e.g. rise in incomes (1) it is shown by a shift in the demand curve (1). 4 Up to 2 marks for diagram(s) showing the difference. Maximum of 2 marks for extension in demand and a maximum of 2 marks for an increase in demand. Question Answer Marks Guidance 3(c) Analyse the effects on income distribution and tax revenue of an increase in indirect taxes. Coherent analysis which might include: Income is likely to become less evenly distributed (1) indirect taxes are usually regressive (1) taking a larger percentage of income of the poor (1). Tax revenue likely to rise (1) will rise more on goods with inelastic demand (1) e.g. food (1) may fall if demand falls significantly (1). If any extra tax revenue is spent on lower income groups (1) e.g. welfare benefits (1) the effect on income distribution is less certain / income may be more evenly distributed (1). Tax evasion and avoidance is less common in the case of indirect taxes (1) though there may be informal markets (1). 6 Question Answer Marks Guidance 3(d) Discuss whether or not a government should impose a maximum price on food. In assessing each answer, use the table opposite. Why it should: • may influence price and quantity purchased • if set below the equilibrium level, will reduce price • some people will be able to purchase food at a lower price • may reduce poverty – food is a basic necessity • may stop monopoly food producers setting high prices. Why it should not: • if set above the equilibrium, it will have no effect • it set below the equilibrium, will result in shortages • some additional measure will have to be introduced to ration out food • some foods may be harmful to health and their consumption should be discouraged • may result in firms making losses and so reducing quality of food or employment of workers • free market forces may result in a more efficient allocation of resources. 8 Level Descriptors Mark 3 A reasoned discussion which accurately examines both sides of the economic argument, making use of economic information and clear and logical analysis to evaluate economic issues and situations. One side of the argument may have more depth than the other, but overall both sides of the argument are considered and developed. There is thoughtful evaluation of economic concepts, terminology, information and/or data appropriate to the question. The discussion may also point out the possible uncertainties of alternative decisions and outcomes. 6–8 2 A reasoned discussion which makes use of economic information and clear analysis to evaluate economic issues and situations. The answer may lack some depth and development or may be one-sided. There is relevant use of economic concepts, terminology, information and data appropriate to the question. 3–5 1 There is a simple attempt at using economic definitions and terminology. Some reference may be made to economic theory, with occasional understanding. 1–2 0 A mark of zero should be awarded for no creditable content. 0 Question Answer Marks Guidance 3(d) Example of L2 answer: Government should impose a maximum price on foods. Price is likely to fall and this will aid those in poverty. They will be able to buy basic necessities easier and allow them to spend on other things. Governments should not impose a maximum price on food as it can cause businesses to make a loss and need government subsidisation. Principal Examiner comment: Reasonable on one side and limited on the other side. The effect on price, quantity demanded and quantity supplied may be shown on a diagram.

Question 7

(a) Calculate the value of Nigeria’s exports of goods in 2017. [1] (b) Identify two examples of capital goods. [2] (c) Explain whether Nige…

Accepted Answer

1(a) Calculate the value of Nigeria’s exports of goods in 2017. $43.1bn 1 $ is not essential. 1(b) Identify two examples of capital goods. Two from: • [delivery] vehicles • machines • [office] equipment 2 1(c) Explain whether Nigeria had a budget deficit or a budget surplus in 2017. • budget deficit (1) • government spending exceeded tax revenue (1) • government spending was $19.5bn and tax revenue was $12.9bn (1) 2 1(d) Explain how government spending on training may increase tax revenue in the long run. Logical explanation which might include: • Training may increase skills of workers (1) raise productivity (1) raise wages / incomes (1) increase job opportunities / employment / reduce unemployment (1) increase income tax revenue (1). • Higher wages may increase spending / demand (1) increase indirect tax revenue (1). • A more productive labour force may reduce costs of production (1) raise profits (1) increase corporation tax revenue (1). 4 Question Answer Marks Guidance 1(e) Analyse how living standards in Nigeria compare with the living standards in Ethiopia in 2017. Coherent analysis which might include: • Nigeria’s higher GDP per head (income) (1) suggests Nigerians may have been able to enjoy more goods and services (1). • Nigeria has a lower life expectancy (1) suggesting poorer healthcare (1). • Nigeria has a higher average number of years spent at school (1) suggesting the labour force may be more educated (1). • Nigeria has a higher percentage of underweight five-year olds (1) suggesting poor nutrition / income inequality (1). • Overall comment: Nigeria’s income per head and average years spent at school suggests a higher living standard but life expectancy and percentage of five years underweight suggests a lower living standard (1). 4 Question Answer Marks Guidance 1(f) Analyse how a government could encourage firms to increase their investment. Coherent analysis which might include: • Reduce the rate of interest (1) making it cheaper to borrow (1) encouraging borrowing as consumer spending is likely to rise (1). • Lower corporation tax (1) increasing the funds available to invest (1) increasing the incentive to invest as return from investment would rise (1). • Create greater economic certainty / confidence (1) by e.g. keeping inflation low and stable / not changing government spending and taxation frequently (1) making it easier for firms to plan / it can take time to get a return from investment (1). • Provide subsidies/grants/loans (1) decreasing cost of investments (1) encouraging MNCs (1). • Raise tariffs (1) increasing demand for home produced goods (1). • Less government regulation/policies (1) reduces costs for firms (1) more willing to invest (1). 5 Question Answer Marks Guidance 1(g) Discuss whether or not an increase in Nigeria’s population will benefit its economy. Award up to 4 marks for why it might: • Fall in death rate (1) may indicate improved healthcare (1). • Total (aggregate) demand will increase (1) may enable existing firms to expand / increase output (1) new firms to set up (1) attract MNCs (1). • Labour force may increase (1) causing total (aggregate) supply to increase / raise productive capacity (1) increase output / GDP (1). • May move country towards optimum population (1) if there are unused resources (1). • Net immigration will increase labour force (1) and reduce dependency ratio (1) • More tax revenue (1) can be spent on improving e.g., public services (1). Award up to 4 marks for why it might not: • Birth rate is rising (1) will increase dependency (1) resources which may have increased economic growth may have to be devoted to rearing the children (1). • Labour force may fall in the short run (1) to look after the children (1). • Pressure will be put on the environment (1) there may be more pollution (1) causing overcrowding / poor health (1). • If food output cannot be increased (1) may be more malnourishment/famine / poverty (1) more food is required / food may have to be imported (1) food prices may increase (1). 6 Apply this example to all questions with the command word DISCUSS (1(g), 1(h), 2(d), 3(d), 4(d) and 5(d)) Each point may be credited only once, on either side of an argument, but separate development as to how/why the outcome may differ is rewarded. Generic example Mark Tax revenue may decrease… 1 ...because of reason e.g. incomes may be lower. 1 Tax revenue may increase because incomes may be higher i.e. reverse of a previous argument. 0 Tax revenue may increase because of a different reason i.e. not the reverse of a previous argument e.g. government spending on subsidies may stimulate the economy more than spending on education. 1 Question Answer Marks Guidance 1(g) • Population is rising but age structure may be changing (1) as there is net emigration of young people (1) may result in reduction in labour force (1). • [Opportunity] cost for government (1) which has to spend on health/education rather than infrastructure (1). • Increase in output to meet demand (1) results in faster usage of resources in country (1) and shortages (1). Question Answer Marks Guidance 1(h) Discuss whether or not an increase in Nigeria’s import tariff on rice would increase the output of Nigerian rice. Award up to 4 marks for why it might: • A higher tariff may raise the price of imported rice (1) may reduce demand for / consumption of imported rice (1) may cause Nigerians to demand more home- produced rice as it is cheaper (1) effect would be greater, the greater the elasticity of demand for the import of rice (1) may enable Nigerian rice farmers to raise their price / make more profit (1). • A tariff may raise government tax revenue (1) some of this could be used to subsidise Nigerian rice farmers / modernise farming methods and so raise productivity (1). Award up to 4 marks for why it might not: • Nigerian farmers are less productive than Asian competitors (1) have high(er) costs of production (1) Nigerian price may still be higher even with the higher import tariff (1). • The supply of Nigerian rice may be price-inelastic (1) so even if Nigerian farmers could sell their rice for more, they may have difficulties adjusting supply (1). • More Nigerian rice will not be sold if quality is poor (1) consumers my prefer the varieties of rice produced in other countries (1) other countries retaliate by imposing higher tariffs (1) current account surplus may be reduced (1). • Increase in import tariffs may be small (1) making little difference to import prices and consumption (1). • Not enough resources/ factors of production e.g., farmers (1) to produce more rice in Nigeria (1). 6

Question 8

The US operates a mainly market economic system. Life expectancy in the US fell in 2017, for the third year in a row. Although the US has a…

Accepted Answer

5(a) Identify two ways a government could reduce income inequality. Two from: • progressive taxation • state benefits • spending on state education / training • spending on state healthcare • equal pay legislation • minimum wage 2 Accept higher taxes on high incomes and lower taxes on low incomes but do not accept increasing taxes on incomes as this is TV. Redistributing income is TV – could be redistributing from the poor to the rich. 5(b) Explain two advantages of a market economic system. Logical explanation which might include: Consumer sovereignty (1) with consumers deciding what goods and services are produced (1). Low prices (1) due to competition (1). High quality (1) due to innovation (1). Consumer choice (1) variety of products produced (1). Greater efficiency (1) due to the profit motive (1). Automatic adjustment to changes in demand and supply / quick response to changes in demand and supply (1) via changes in price / with use of the price mechanism / increase consumer satisfaction (1). 4 One mark each for each of two advantages identified and one mark each for each of two explanations. Nothing for no taxes. Question Answer Marks Guidance 5(c) Analyse why life expectancy may decrease. Coherent analysis which might include: Incomes may fall (1) lowering living standards / reducing access to basic necessities (1). Reduction in healthcare (1) e.g limited access to medication (1). Reduction in education (1) people may lead less healthy lives (1) more smoking (1) more ‘junk food’ (1) less exercise (1). Rise in poor nutrition / malnutrition (1) eating more low-quality food / people not having enough food (1). More pollution (1) making people more susceptible to diseases (1). May be spread of new diseases / pandemics (1) wars / civil unrest (1). Climate change (1) may result in more natural disasters (1). More people employed in jobs with poor working conditions / more dangerous jobs (1) resulting in more sickness / accidents (1). 6 Question Answer Marks Guidance 5(d) Discuss whether or not supply-side policy measures can reduce inflation. In assessing each answer, use the table opposite. Why they might: • they may increase total (aggregate) supply, reducing cost-push inflation • they can allow total (aggregate) demand to increase without causing inflation • education and training can increase labour productivity, reducing labour costs • a cut in direct taxes may increase the incentive to be more productive and more innovative • labour market reforms may reduce power of trade unions and reduce rise in wages • subsidies can lower costs of production Why they might not: • privatisation does not always increase competition and so does not always lower prices • education and training can be expensive, may be in areas that are not in demand and will have a time lag • cuts in income tax may increase total (aggregate) demand as well as total (aggregate) supply • resource limitations / unable to increase productive capacity due to e.g. limited land available • inflation may be caused by rise in price of raw materials which have no domestic substitute e.g. oil 8 Only accept lower interest rates, if linked to increasing total supply. Level Description Marks 3 A reasoned discussion which accurately examines both sides of the economic argument, making use of economic information and clear and logical analysis to evaluate economic issues and situations. One side of the argument may have more depth than the other, but overall, both sides of the argument are considered and developed. There is thoughtful evaluation of economic concepts, terminology, information and/or data appropriate to the question. The discussion may also point out the possible uncertainties of alternative decisions and outcomes. 6–8 2 A reasoned discussion which makes use of economic information and clear analysis to evaluate economic issues and situations. The answer may lack some depth and development may be one-sided. There is relevant use of economic concepts, terminology, information and data appropriate to the question. 3–5 Question Answer Marks Guidance 5(d) Level Description Marks 1 There is a simple attempt at using economic definitions and terminology. Some reference may be made to economic theory, with occasional understanding. 1–2 0 A mark of zero should be awarded for no creditable content. 0

Question 9

(a) Calculate the number of births in Cyprus in 2019. [1] (b) Identify two indicators of living standards. [2] (c) State why the global mar…

Accepted Answer

1(a) Calculate the number of births in Cyprus in 2019. 12 240 (1) 1 1(b) Identify two indicators of living standards. GDP per head / per capita (1). HDI (1). Life expectancy / healthy people (1). Proportion of people in primary sector (1). Level of education / qualifications (1). 2 Do not reward GDP 1(c) State why the global market for grapes was in disequilibrium in 2019. Bad weather / failure of the grape harvest (1) there was a shortage (1) which means demand exceeded supply (1). 2 1(d) Explain two reasons why more well-educated workers tend to work past retirement age than less-educated workers. Logical explanation which might include: Well-paid / good work benefits (1) which provides an incentive to work for longer / high job satisfaction / enter workforce late (1). Healthy (1) and so more able to work for longer / remain productive (1). Work in jobs which do not require physical strength / less tiring (1) older workers tend to be less strong / allows them to continue working as long as remain fit (1). 4 One mark for each of two reasons identified and one mark for each explanation. Question Answer Marks Guidance 1(e) Analyse how a rise in a country’s retirement age is likely to affect its government’s budget. Coherent analysis which might include: A rise in the retirement age / less people retired will reduce the cost of pensions (1) may reduce government spending / government may spend on alternatives e.g., infrastructure, education or health (1). More people in work will increase incomes / businesses expand production (1) raise direct tax revenue (1) spending will increase (1) raise indirect tax revenue (1). 4 Question Answer Marks Guidance 1(f) Analyse the relationship between inflation rates and current account balances. Coherent analysis which might include: Overview: Generally, an inverse relationship / the lower the inflation rate, the higher the current account surplus or the higher the inflation rate, the higher the current account deficit (1). Supporting evidencemax of 2 marks Mongolia has the highest inflation rate (1) and the largest current account deficit (1) Mongolia / Kenya / Nepal have the highest inflation rates (1) all have a current account deficit (1). Iceland / Slovenia have a low rate of inflation (1) but have a current balance of payments surplus (1) Exception: Cyprus lowest inflation rate (1) but a current account deficit / 3rd highest current account deficit (1). Comments: Most of the table shows the expected relationship. (1) Low inflation rates may make products more price competitive / high inflation rates may make prices less price competitive (1) 5 Do not accept current account balance is high or low. Answers need to refer to size of surplus or deficit. Simply using data without explanation is description rather than analysis. Question Answer Marks Guidance 1(g) Discuss whether or not, after 2019, Cyprus’s production possibility curve (PPC) is to shift to the right. Award up to 4 marks for logical reasons why it might, which may include: Quantity / quality of resources may have increased (1) retirement age may have increased (1) people living longer (1) so labour force is likely to have increased (1). Investment may have increased (1) due to low interest rates (1) more capital goods would increase productive capacity (1). Award up to 4 marks for logical reasons why it might not, which may include: Quantity and quality of resources may have decreased (1) land quality is decreasing (1) which will reduce the productivity of land (1). Entrepreneurs may emigrate (1) reducing the supply of enterprise / skilled workers (1). Birth rate is falling (1) size of workforce may fall in future (1) Covid19 may have reduced productivity (1). For recognising that any of these reasons could result in PPC shifting to the left / stay unchanged (1). 6 Apply this example to all questions with the command word DISCUSS (1g, 1h, 2d, 3d, 4d and 5d) Each point may be credited only once, on either side of an argument, but separate development as to how/why the outcome may differ is rewarded. Generic example Marks Tax revenue may decrease 1 because of reason e.g., incomes may be lower. 1 Tax revenue may increase because incomes may be higher i.e., reverse of a previous argument. 0 Tax revenue may increase because of a different reason i.e., not the reverse of a previous argument e.g., government spending on subsidies may stimulate the economy more than spending on education. 1 Question Answer Marks Guidance 1(h) Discuss whether or not adopting capital-intensive production will benefit consumers. Award up to 4 marks for logical reasons why it might, which may include: It may reduce costs of production / more efficient / may result in economies of scale (1) lower costs may reduce prices (1). It may avoid disruption to supply (1) as no industrial action / strikes (1). It may be quicker / faster (1) to respond to changes in consumer demand (1) It may raise quality (1) as absence of human error (1). Award up to 4 marks for logical reasons why it might not, which may include: Products may be standardised / lack variety (1) individual wants may not be met (1). Capital equipment may break down / costly to maintain (1) causing delays in production (1). Initial high cost of capital equipment (1) may push up prices (1). 6

Question 10

Australia’s foreign exchange rate fluctuates. The value of Australia’s exports is regularly greater than the value of its imports. Australi…

Accepted Answer

2(a) Define foreign exchange rate. The price / value of a currency (1) in terms of another currency / currencies (1). 2 2(b) Explain two reasons why the value of a country’s exports may be greater than the value of its imports. Logical explanation which might include: Price of exports may be lower than price of other countries’ products (1) due to e.g., devaluation / depreciation / weaker currency / higher productivity / lower inflation (1). Quality of exports may be higher than the quality of other countries’ products (1) due to e.g., more investment / better education / specialisation (1). Incomes abroad may have increased (1) enabling foreigners to buy more of the country’s products (1). Protective measures (1) restrict imports / subsidise domestic firms or exports (1). May have high value exports e.g., oil (1) with high (global) demand (1). Recession / low demand at home (1) results in fewer imports / encourages firms to export (1). 4 One mark for each of two reasons identified and one mark for each explanation. Question Answer Marks Guidance 2(c) Analyse how an increase in income tax can affect a country’s inflation rate. One mark for a simple explanation that an increase in income tax can reduce the rate of inflation Coherent analysis which might include: An increase in income tax will reduce disposable income / purchasing power (1) this may reduce consumer spending (1) lower total demand (1) this may encourage firms to reduce prices / reduce price rises (1) lower demand-pull inflation (1). Increase in income tax may encourage workers to press for wage rises (1) increase costs of production (1) cause cost-push inflation (1). Income tax revenue can be used to provide e.g., subsidies to certain goods and services (1) reducing prices (1). 6 Question Answer Marks Guidance 2(d) Discuss whether or not governments should aim for a high rate of economic growth. In assessing each answer, use the table opposite. Why it should:  economic growth can raise incomes  higher incomes can raise living standards  economic growth can reduce unemployment  economic growth can increase tax revenue allowing the government to spend more on e.g., education. Why it should not:  may deplete non-renewable resources which can reduce future growth  may result in pollution  may put other demands on workers who may have to work long hours  may lead to a deficit on current account of the balance of payment  may result in greater inequality  risk of inflation 8 Level Description Marks 3 A reasoned discussion which accurately examines both sides of the economic argument, making use of economic information and clear and logical analysis to evaluate economic issues and situations. One side of the argument may have more depth than the other, but overall, both sides of the argument are considered and developed. There is thoughtful evaluation of economic concepts, terminology, information and / or data appropriate to the question. The discussion may also point out the possible uncertainties of alternative decisions and outcomes. 68 2 A reasoned discussion which makes use of economic information and clear analysis to evaluate economic issues and situations. The answer may lack some depth and development may be one- sided. There is relevant use of economic concepts, terminology, information and data appropriate to the question. 35 Question Answer Marks Guidance 2(d) Level Description Marks 1 There is a simple attempt at using economic definitions and terminology. Some reference may be made to economic theory, with occasional understanding. 12 0 A mark of zero should be awarded for no creditable content. 0

Question 11

(a) Calculate Bhutan’s GDP in 2018. [1] (b) Identify two indicators that are in both the World Happiness Index and the Human Development In…

Accepted Answer

1(a) Calculate Bhutan’s GDP in 2018. $2.6 bn / $2600 m / $2 600 000 000 / 2.6  10⁹ (1). 1(b) Identify two indicators that are in both the World Happiness Index and the Human Development Index. Life expectancy (1) GDP per head (1). 2 If more than two indicators are given, consider the first three. 1(c) State why Bhutan’s 2018 government budget is likely to have increased total demand in Bhutan. Government spending was greater than government revenue (1) there was a budget deficit (1) of $70 m (1) the government may have used expansionary fiscal policy (1). 2 1(d) Explain two reasons why someone may prefer to work in the tertiary sector rather than in the primary sector. Logical explanation which might include: Better working conditions / non-wage factors (1) e.g. working inside / not having to work in wet weather / less stress / more job satisfaction / fringe benefits (1). Shorter working hours (1) permitting more leisure time (1). Type of work / less physically demanding / not manual work (1) less risk to health / less tiring / less dangerous / fewer accidents / may lack physical strength (1). Better paid (1) enabling more goods and services to be purchased / higher standard of living / as may require more qualifications / skills/training / value added may greater in the tertiary sector / tertiary sector may be expanding / primary sector contracting / may be higher demand for tertiary workers (1). 4 One mark for each of two reasons identified and one mark for each explanation. Note there is a degree of ‘mix and match’ here. For example, working hours or manual work can be taken as a development of working conditions. Accept an answer that explains the disadvantages of working in the primary sector e.g. may prefer to work in the tertiary sector as working hours are longer in the primary sector. Question Answer Marks Guidance 1(e) Analyse how investment in capital goods and education can increase New Zealand’s productivity. Coherent analysis which might include: Higher investment in capital goods will enable workers to work with better equipment (1) more output per worker / worker hour (1). New capital goods may incorporate advances in technology / be of higher quality (1) result in innovation (1) can work for long hours (1). Higher investment in education can enable more children to be educated / children to be educated for longer / improve quality of education / increase knowledge (1) increase workers’ skills / qualifications (1) enable workers to use more advanced technology (1). Investment in capital goods and/or education can enable capital goods/ workers to work at a faster rate (1) be more efficient (1) make fewer mistakes / less wastage (1). 4 Up to 3 marks for analysis on investment in capital goods and up to 3 marks for investment in education. Note only credit increase efficiency once. Question Answer Marks Guidance 1(f) Analyse the relationship between GDP per head and net migration. Coherent analysis which might include: Overview Generally, the countries with higher GDP per head have net immigration / net migration / the countries with lower GDP per head tend to have net emigration / positive/direct relationship (1). Supporting evidence Up to 2 marks for two pieces of supporting evidence e.g.  New Zealand has the highest GDP per head and the highest net immigration / net migration / highest positive migration (1)  Cyprus has the second highest GDP per head and the second highest net immigration / net migration / positive migration (1)  the four countries with the highest GDP per head, all have net immigration / positive net migration (1)  the two countries with lowest GDP per head both have net emigration / negative net migration (1) Exception Exception is Kenya or Mozambique (1) Kenya has higher GDP per head but higher net emigration than Mozambique (1). Comments Higher GDP per head may encourage people to move to the country to increase their living standards / income / people who migrate into the country may be high skilled / lower GDP per head may encourage people to emigrate to increase their living standards/income (1) other influences e.g. immigration controls / size of population / wars / political instability (1). 5 There may be an implied comparison e.g. generally countries with a high GDP per head have net immigration. New Zealand has a GDP per head of approx. $55 000 and net immigration of about 40,00 whereas Kenya has a GDP per head of $2,000 and net emigration of about 50 000 (1 mark). For explanation of exception, do not accept that Kenya has ‘lower net migration’ / Mozambique has ‘higher net migration’ – a misinterpretation of the figure. Question Answer Marks Guidance 1(g) Discuss whether or not enterprise is likely to have increased in New Zealand after 2019. Award up to 4 marks for logical reasons why it might, which may include: High labour productivity / high-skilled workers (1) may keep costs down (1) and increase profits (1) which will motivate more people to be entrepreneurs (1). Higher investment / better quality capital goods (1) may increase the number of firms / result in expansion of firms (1) and the opportunities to become entrepreneurs (1). Investment in education / better quality education (1) may increase the people with the skills to become entrepreneurs / increase risk taking ability (1). Higher government spending on mental health / child poverty / pollution (1) may increase workers’ skills / increase workers’ health / increase workers’ productivity (1) higher government subsidies (1) reduce firms’ costs of production (1) higher government spending may increase total demand (1). Higher economic growth (1) may have created more opportunities / greater confidence / higher total demand (1). Net immigration may have continued (1) and some immigrants may have been entrepreneurs / may set up new firms (1) more people in the country may raise total demand (1). Cut in income tax rates (1) could increase demand (1) firms’ revenue / profits (1) create greater profit incentive (1). 6 Apply this example to all questions with the command word DISCUSS (1g, 1h, 2d, 3d, 4d and 5d) Each point may be credited only once, on either side of an argument, but separate development as to how/why the outcome may differ is rewarded. Generic example Mark Tax revenue may decrease… 1 ...because of reason e.g., incomes may be lower. 1 Tax revenue may increase because incomes may be higher i.e., reverse of a previous argument. 0 Tax revenue may increase because of a different reason i.e., not the reverse of a previous argument e.g. government spending on subsidies may stimulate the economy more than spending on education. 1 Question Answer Marks Guidance 1(g) Award up to 4 marks for logical reasons why it might not, which may include: Uncertainty / lack of confidence (1) reason e.g. there may have been a recession / negative economic growth / unclear what may happen to GDP (1) which could have resulted in the reward to enterprise declining (1) may think there is a greater risk of running / setting up a firm (1). Corporation tax may have increased / tax may have increased (1) which would reduce retained profits / amount of profit that can be kept (1). Government attempts to reduce pollution / poverty / improve mental health (1) may increase firms’ costs of production and reduce profits (1) may have an opportunity cost (1) less spending on something that could increase enterprise (1) e.g. reduction is spending on education (1). Accept tax revenue may have increased for tax may have increased for why it might not Reward recognition that tax revenue may rise without a rise in tax rates or with a fall in tax rates. Question Answer Marks Guidance 1(h) Discuss whether or not a cut in income tax rates will increase living standards. Award up to 4 marks for logical reasons why it might, which may include: Will increase disposable income (1) increase ability to buy goods and services / increase purchasing power (1) buy basic necessities / reduce absolute poverty (1) may be able to fulfil more wants / buy more luxuries (1). May increase spending (1) increase total demand (1) reduce unemployment / increase employment (1) increase output / increase economic growth (1). May increase saving (1) and so provide a safety net (1). May encourage investment (1) which may lower costs of production (1) reduce prices (1). May be able to buy more merit goods / better quality education/healthcare (1) increase health / life expectancy (1). May increase the incentive to work (1) may earn more in work than on unemployment benefits (1). May enable people to work fewer hours (1) enjoy more leisure time (1). 6 Rise in income is not sufficient – need idea of disposable income. Question Answer Marks Guidance 1(h) Award up to 4 marks for logical reasons why it might not, which may include: Tax revenue may fall (1) may result in a cut in government spending (1) on e.g. education / health care / mental healthcare / child poverty / pollution / unemployment benefit (1) poor may be most reliant on public services (1). It may increase congestion as people buy more cars (1) may lead to pollution (1). It may increase depletion of non-renewable resources as consumption increases (1). It may benefit mostly the rich / poor may not benefit / will not benefit the unemployed (1) and so not everyone may enjoy higher living standards (1). People may spend on demerit goods (1) higher spending which could reduce health / life expectancy (1). Higher spending / demand may increase prices / cause inflation (1) leave purchasing power unchanged / reduce purchasing power (1).

Question 12

(a) Calculate how many dollars 6400 Nigerian naira would have bought in 2019. [1] (b) Identify two ways a bank could increase demand for it…

Accepted Answer

Question Answer Marks Guidance 1(a) Calculate how many dollars 6400 Nigerian naira would 1 have bought in 2019. 16 (1). 1(b) Identify two ways a bank could increase demand for its 2 services. Open more branches (1) carry out an advertising campaign (1) improve online / mobile banking (1). 1(c) State why a merger between two commercial banks is a 2 horizontal merger. Same stage of production / both in the tertiary (service) sector / same sector (1) same industry / same product / same service (1) can increase market share (1). 1(d) Explain two reasons why a large US commercial bank 4 One mark for each of two reasons identified and one mark may charge a high price for its services. for each explanation. Logical explanation which might include: High spending on opening new branches / advertising campaigns / developing online banking (1) need to get back costs / make a profit / may experience diseconomies of scale (1). May offer high quality services (1) have high demand / customers willing to pay a high price (1). High degree of monopoly / market power / control 32% of market (1) customers may have brand loyalty / reluctant to switch banks / lack of substitutes / inelastic demand / can charge high prices to earn high profits/raise total revenue / be a price maker (1). High incomes in the US (1) many customers have the ability to pay a high price (1). Employ skilled / well educated workers (1) so may pay high wages / may have high costs of production (1). 1(e) Analyse how an increase in unemployment may affect 4 the Nigerian government’s budget. Coherent analysis which might include: Likely to increase a deficit / reduce a surplus / may result in a budget deficit (1). Tax revenue likely to fall / budget likely to fall (1) due to lower incomes (1) less income tax revenue (1) lower profits (1) less corporation tax revenue (1) lower spending (1) less indirect tax revenue (1) government may cut taxes to reduce unemployment (1). Government spending likely to rise (1) more spending on e.g. benefits / subsidies to the poor / law and order/ healthcare (1) may be more spending on measures to reduce unemployment / expansionary fiscal policy (1) may spend less on other areas e.g. education (1). 1(f) Analyse the relationship between countries’ average 5 No marks for just stating what the figures are e.g. Germany years of schooling and birth rates. has 15 years of schooling and a birth rate of approximately 8. US has 14 years of schooling and a birth rate of Coherent analysis which might include: approximately 12. Argentina has 11 years of schooling and Overview a birth rate of approximately 16 etc. Generally, an inverse relationship / the more years of schooling, the lower the birth rate / the fewer years of schooling, the higher the birth rate (1). Supporting evidence Up to 2 marks maximum for two pieces of relevant supporting evidence e.g.: • Germany has the highest years of schooling and lowest birth rate (1) • Chad has lowest years of schooling and highest birth rate (1) • US has more years of schooling than Argentina and so a lower birth rate (1) • the three countries with three highest years of schooling have the three lowest birth rates (1). Exception Nigeria / Eritrea (1) Nigeria has more years of schooling than Eritrea but a higher birth rate (1). Comments More years of schooling is likely to cause people to form partnerships / have children later / focus on careers / increase awareness of contraception/family planning / increase health / reduce size of families (1) increase cost of raising children / having more children may reduce the ability of families to keep their children in education for many years / exception may be result of other influences e.g. differences in fertility rates / differences in social attitudes (1). 1(g) Discuss whether or not a subsidy, given to farmers by 6 Apply this example to all questions with the command the Nigerian government, would reduce the deficit on word DISCUSS the current account of its balance of payments. (1g, 1h, 2d, 3d, 4d and 5d) Award up to 4 marks for logical reasons why it might, which Each point may be credited only once, on either side of an may include: argument, but separate development as to how/why the It should raise supply / increase output (1) equivalent to outcome may differ is rewarded. lower cost (1) lower price (1) increasing international competitiveness (1). Generic example mark There may be more funds available to invest (1) raise quality (1) increase exports / reduce imports (1). Tax revenue may decrease… 1 Award up to 4 marks for logical reasons why it might not, ...because of reason e.g. incomes may be 1 which may include: lower. It may increase inefficiency (1) as firms rely on the subsidy (1) may not pass on the benefit of the subsidy to consumers Tax revenue may increase because incomes 0 (1). may be higher i.e. reverse of a previous Nigeria may have a high inflation rate (1) which may offset argument. the cost advantage of the subsidy (1). There may an increase in incomes at home (1) which may Tax revenue may increase because of a 1 increase imports / divert exports to the home market (1). different reason i.e. not the reverse of a There may be a recession abroad / decrease in incomes of previous argument e.g. government spending trading partners (1) which reduces exports (1). on subsidies may stimulate the economy more Lower export prices will not raise export revenue if demand than spending on education. is inelastic (1). The exchange rate may rise (1) increasing export prices / lowering import prices (1). Farmers may import e.g. more machinery (1). There may be adverse weather conditions / disease (1) which reduces quality / quality may remain poor (1). There may be import restrictions / increase in import restrictions imposed by other countries (1). 1(h) Discuss whether or not the US government should 6 A minimum price diagram without explanation can get a impose a minimum price on chocolate. maximum of 2 marks. These marks may be the equivalent of a combination of two of higher price, demand extending, Award up to 4 marks for logical reasons why it should, supply extending or a surplus being created. which may include: It will raise price (1) reduce demand / demand contracts / quantity demand falls / consumption falls. (1) reduce obesity (1). Social cost of eating chocolate may exceed social benefit (1) due to external costs (1) example e.g. cost on health service / may reduce need for government spending on healthcare (1) overconsumption of chocolate (1) move market closer to where social benefit equals social cost (1) increase welfare (1). May raise health of the population / eating chocolate may be unhealthy (1) raise labour productivity (1). There may be information failure (1) some chocolate is a demerit good (1). Award up to 4 marks for logical reasons why it should not, which may include: Poor may not be able to afford chocolate (1) regressive measure (1). Not everyone overweight / some may consume chocolate in quantities that are not harmful (1) may cause demand to switch to other high sugar products / discriminate against other high sugar products (1). It will encourage supply to extend (1) a surplus may develop (1). There may be an illegal market in chocolate (1). There may be a cost to the government (1) it may have to pay to monitor that the price is being charged (1) lower tax revenue from chocolate (1) may be an increase in unemployment (1). 1(h) Demand may be inelastic (1) resulting in a relatively small fall in demand / chocolate may be addictive (1). It depends on how high the minimum price is (1) may have no effect if set below the market equilibrium (1).

Question 13

In 2019, Russia had an unemployment rate of 4.6%. Russia experienced full employment in the past. Its government wants unemployment to be l…

Accepted Answer

3(a) Define full employment. 2 One mark for idea of full employment of resources e.g. all workers in employment. The lowest unemployment possible (very low percentage) / job vacancies matching the number unemployed (2). Low unemployment (1). May still be some workers in between jobs / some frictional unemployment (1). Zero unemployment (1). 3(b) Explain the difference between a proportional income 4 Three marks maximum for proportional income tax system tax system and a progressive income tax system. and three marks maximum for progressive income tax system. Logical explanation which might include: Proportional income tax system takes the same percentage / proportion of income (1) from all income groups (1). In a proportional income tax rate system, the tax rate does not change (1) as income changes (1) has no effect on the distribution of income (1). Progressive income tax system takes a larger percentage / smaller percentage (1) of the income of the rich / the poor / places a larger burden on the rich (1) helps redistribute income from the rich to the poor / reduces the gap between rich and poor / may be used to promote equity (1). In a progressive income tax rate system, the tax rate increases (1) as income increases (1). 3(c) Analyse why a cut in government spending might 6 increase poverty. Coherent analysis which might include: A cut in government spending might reduce total demand (1) increasing unemployment (1) reducing incomes (1). Government spending on subsidies to firms might be reduced (1) which may raise prices (1). Government spending on education might be reduced (1) this might cause a decrease in skills (1) reducing wages (1) may lead to vicious cycle of poverty (1). Government spending on healthcare might be reduced (1) lowering productivity and wages (1). Government spending on state / unemployment benefits might be reduced (1) reducing goods and services that can be bought (1). Government spending on state pensions might be reduced (1) the old may not be able to buy basic necessities (1). 3(d) Discuss whether or not a fall in a country’s 8 Level Description Marks unemployment rate always benefits workers. 3 A reasoned discussion which 6–8 In assessing each answer, use the table opposite. accurately examines both sides of the economic argument, making use of Why it might be: economic information and clear and • increase choice of jobs logical analysis to evaluate economic • increase wages issues and situations. One side of the argument may have more depth than • raise living standards the other, but overall both sided of the • increase job security argument are considered and • competition for workers may raise working conditions developed. There is thoughtful • more may be spent on training. evaluation of economic concepts, terminology, information and/or data Why it might not be: appropriate to the question. The • may be result of workers leaving the labour force e.g. discussion may also point out the emigrating possible uncertainties of alternative • may not benefit all workers as some may still be decisions and outcomes. unemployed • may not be high quality jobs 2 A reasoned discussion which makes 3–5 • may be low-paid jobs use of economic information and clear • may be temporary jobs analysis to evaluate economic issues and situations. The answer may lack • may cause inflation reducing real wages. some depth and development may be one-sided. There is relevant use of economic concepts, terminology, information and data appropriate to the question. 1 There is a simple attempt at using 1–2 economic definitions and terminology. Some reference may be made to economic theory, with occasional understanding. 0 A mark of zero should be awarded for 0 no creditable content.

Question 14

(a) Calculate Australia’s unemployment rate in 2021. [1] (b) Identify two substitutes for coal. [2] (c) Explain one economy of scale that c…

Accepted Answer

1(a) Calculate Australia’s unemployment rate in 2021. 4% Allow 4 without percentage 1(b) Identify two substitutes for coal. Two from:  gas  offshore wind / wind power  solar power / panels 2 1(c) Explain one economy of scale that could benefit a coal- mining firm. Managerial / labour economy (1) employing specialist workers e.g. mining engineers (1). Technical economy (1) employing efficient / technologically advanced equipment e.g. drones (1). External economy of scale (1) example e.g. skilled labour force (1). 2 One mark for the economy of scale identified and one mark for an explanation. 1(d) Explain two influences on the price elasticity of supply of coal. Storage time (1) expensive to store so inelastic supply (1). Construction of new mine / production time (1) takes a long time, so inelastic supply (1). Stocks (1) may make supply elastic (1). 4 One mark each for each of two influences identified and one mark each for each of two explanations. Question Answer Marks Guidance 1(e) Draw a demand and supply diagram to show how setting a maximum price below the equilibrium price will affect a market. Demand and supply diagram: Axes correctly labelled – price and quantity or p and q (1). Demand and supply curves correctly labelled (1). Price line set below the equilibrium (1). Demand shown as greater than supply (1) e.g. has the two dotted lines downwards (it does not have to be labelled Qs and Qd). 4 Note: Accept unlabelled price line / line drawn only to demand curve. Accept shortage if correctly identified on the diagram. Do not accept demand greater than supply if demand and supply curves are incorrectly drawn Question Answer Marks Guidance 1(f) Analyse whether large coal-producing countries are likely to be net exporters of coal. Coherent analysis which might include: Expected outcome: Large coal-producing countries may have a surplus to sell / may have grown their production in order to sell abroad (1) most of the evidence supports this relationship (1). Supporting evidence: Five of the seven countries consume less coal than they produce (1) calculation e.g. US could have exported 11 million tonnes / Australia could have exported 394 million tonnes or simply the difference (1). Analysis: Countries that produce more coal than they consume may benefit from economies of scale / can export because their prices are low (1). Exceptions: China or India are an exception (1) as they consumed more coal than they produced (1). Analysis: They may have been net importers (1) since had used up stocks of coal / need more energy as a developing country (1) may not be able to export coal if world demand for coal is low / countries may both import and export coal (1). 5 Responses do not have to be in the format suggested but they should address the expected / normal outcome, offer supporting evidence of that, highlight any exceptions to that, and analyse the overall data. Question Answer Marks Guidance 1(g) Discuss whether or not an increase in the size of its coal industry will benefit the Australian economy. Award up to 4 marks for logical reasons why it might, which may include:  may increase GDP / economic growth (1) increasing living standards / raise incomes / reduce poverty (1)  may reduce unemployment (1) structural unemployment (1)  may improve current account position / have a surplus (1) as Australia seems to be a net exporter of coal (1)  may increase tax revenue (1) increasing government’s ability to spend (1)  economies of scale (1) result in lower prices for households and industries (1). Award up to 4 marks for logical reasons why it might not, which may include:  may increase pollution (1) lowering living standards / cause health issues (1) reduce tourism / negative impact on current account (1)  other forms of power may not be developed (1) example (1)  some workers may leave other jobs (1) these jobs may have better working conditions (1)  coal mining is a relatively dangerous industry (1) so life expectancy may be reduced / creates chronic illnesses / workers unable to work (1).  Global demand for coal may fall (1) impact upon Australia e.g. unsold stock (1).  May rapidly deplete stocks (1) leading to lower exports (1) and less employment (1). 6 Apply this example to all questions with the command word DISCUSS (1g, 1h, 2d, 3d, 4d and 5d) Each point may be credited only once, on either side of an argument, but separate development as to how/why the outcome may differ is rewarded. Generic example Mark Tax revenue may decrease … 1 … because of reason e.g. incomes may be lower. 1 Tax revenue may increase because incomes may be higher i.e. reverse of a previous argument. 0 Tax revenue may increase because of a different reason i.e. not the reverse of a previous argument e.g. government spending on subsidies may stimulate the economy more than spending on education. 1 Question Answer Marks Guidance 1(h) Discuss whether or not Australia is likely to have a budget deficit in 2026. Award up to 4 marks for logical reasons why it might, which may include:  unemployment is forecast to increase (1) so there may be more government spending on unemployment benefits (1) less income tax revenue (1)  there may be more government spending on retraining unemployed workers (1)  some of the rise in population may result in more government spending (1) e.g. on pensions / healthcare / education (up to 2 marks)  budget deficit in previous years (1) would mean interest would have to be paid on the debt that has built up (1). Award up to 4 marks for logical reasons why it might not, which may include:  population and the labour force are forecast to increase (1) so there may be more taxpayers / fewer claiming benefits (1)  tax revenue may rise (1) due to higher profits / higher tax rates (1)  GDP is forecast to increase (1) more people in work (1) which would be likely to increase direct and indirect tax revenue (1)  state support for industries may fall (1) may have been high in 2021 due to Covid-19 (1). 6

Question 15

Living standards, including education, have improved for most people in South Africa in recent years. Most households have more money and t…

Accepted Answer

2(a) Identify two functions of money. Two from:  Medium of exchange  Unit of account / measure of value  Store of value  Standard of deferred payments 2 Note: a description of the function, without the term, gets a mark e.g. money can be used to buy and sell products, may be used to trade. Nothing for characteristics of money. If more than two functions are given, consider the first three. 2(b) Explain how improved education may affect the demand for cigarettes and for fresh fruit. Logical explanation which might include: It may reduce demand for cigarettes (1) people may be better informed about harmful effects / cigarettes are a demerit good (1). It may increase demand for fresh fruit (1) people may be better informed about beneficial effects / fresh fruit is a merit good / may gain better paid jobs and so able to afford fresh food (1). 4 Only accept demand for cigarettes may increase if linked to higher income (resulting from improved education). One mark for each of two reasons identified and one for each of two explanations. Question Answer Marks Guidance 2(c) Analyse the causes of an increase in a government’s tax revenue. Coherent analysis which might include: Tax revenue is government income / part of government fiscal policy (1) which can be spent on government objectives e.g. education (1) Increase in employment (1) increase in income (1) More convenient (1) easier to pay (1) and collect the tax (1) higher income tax revenue (1) Increase in spending (1) higher indirect tax revenue (1) Increase in profits (1) higher corporation tax (1) Increase in population (1) more people to pay taxes (1) Change in tax rates (1) higher tax rates can increase revenue without a change in income / spending / profits (1) lower tax rates may reduce tax avoidance / evasion (1) increase incentives (1) Greater efficiency in tax collection (1) reduction in corruption / simpler forms (1) Wider tax base (1) more products / more people taxed (1) Increase in imports (1) higher revenue from tariffs (1). 6 Question Answer Marks Guidance 2(d) Discuss whether or not an increase in unemployment benefit payments would reduce poverty. In assessing each answer, use the table opposite. Why it might:  raise incomes of those on low incomes  may enable them to buy more basic necessities  may reduce absolute poverty  may increase total demand  higher total demand may reduce unemployment  Also enable them to seek education / become more employable Why it might not:  may be a disincentive to find employment  people may become dependent on benefits  will not help all those on low incomes e.g. the retired and the sick  may not reduce relative poverty  some of the unemployed may not claim benefits  opportunity cost – government could spend on e.g. education which might be more effective.  Size of unemployment benefit may be small and may be less than inflation 8 Level Description Marks 3 A reasoned discussion which accurately examines both sides of the economic argument, making use of economic information and clear and logical analysis to evaluate economic issues and situations. One side of the argument may have more depth than the other, but overall, both sides of the argument are considered and developed. There is thoughtful evaluation of economic concepts, terminology, information and / or data appropriate to the question. The discussion may also point out the possible uncertainties of alternative decisions and outcomes. 6–8 2 A reasoned discussion which makes use of economic information and clear analysis to evaluate economic issues and situations. The answer may lack some depth and development may be one-sided. There is relevant use of economic concepts, terminology, information and data appropriate to the question. 3–5 1 There is a simple attempt at using economic definitions and terminology. Some reference may be made to economic theory, with occasional understanding. 1–2 0 A mark of zero should be awarded for no creditable content. 0

Question 16

In 2020, the price of gold fell in Vietnam. That year, Vietnam was one of Asia’s best performing economies. Unlike some Asian economies, Vi…

Accepted Answer

5(a) Identify how the effect of a fall in the price of gold would be shown on a demand curve for gold. A movement down the demand curve (1) from left to right / extension (1). A movement along the demand curve (1). down the demand curve. Allow one mark for the idea that demand will rise. 5(b) Explain two disadvantages of a recession. Logical explanation which might include: Lower output / lower GDP (1) lower living standards / higher poverty / less income / less consumer spending (1). Higher unemployment / lower employment (1) higher cost of unemployment benefit (1). Lower investment (1) due to reduction in confidence (1). Firms shutdown (1) due to lower profits (1). Lower tax revenue (1) may cause budget deficit / reduce ability to spend e.g. on education / increase in national debt (1). 4 One mark each for each of two disadvantages identified and one mark for each of two explanations. Question Answer Mark Guidance 5(c) Analyse why a country may demand more imports. Coherent analysis which might include: Price of imports may fall (1) due to a fall in costs of production (1) a rise in the exchange rate (1). Quality of imports may rise (1) foreign workers may be less skilled (1) investment in foreign countries may have decreased (1). Incomes may have increased (1) raising the purchasing power of buyers (1) increasing the country’s’ need for consumer goods (1) which the country cannot produce (1) due to specialisation (1). Trade restrictions may be removed or reduced (1) e.g. lower tariffs / quotas / subsidies / embargoes will make it easier to import (1). Country needs more raw materials / lacks the technology to produce certain goods (1) to enable growth of domestic industries (1). Failure of harvest /natural disaster e.g. rice (1) means need to import the good instead (1). 6 Do not expect, but reward reference to absolute or comparative advantage. A maximum of three marks for only identifying the reasons. Question Answer Mark Guidance 5(d) Discuss whether or not fiscal policy can achieve full employment. In assessing each answer, use the table opposite. Why it might:  higher government spending and/or lower taxation may increase total (aggregate) demand which could reduce cyclical unemployment  government spending on education and training could raise workers’ skills could increase their mobility and may reduce frictional unemployment  government spending on the provision of labour market information may reduce frictional unemployment  government spending on subsidies may lead to firms increasing job opportunities. Why it might not:  government spending may not be raised enough / a cut in taxation may not be sufficient  consumer spending and investment may fall if there is a lack of confidence  net exports may fall if there is a global recession  there may still be some labour immobility due to e.g. differences in house prices in different parts of the country so structural unemployment  increased government spending on benefits may be an encouragement not to work and stay unemployed. 8 See Guidance table at the end of the mark scheme. Do not reward a simple reversal of policies in why it might achieve full employment in the why it might not part of the response. Level Description Marks 3 A reasoned discussion which accurately examines both sides of the economic argument, making use of economic information and clear and logical analysis to evaluate economic issues and situations. One side of the argument may have more depth than the other, but overall both sides of the argument are considered and developed. There is thoughtful evaluation of economic concepts, terminology, information and/or data appropriate to the question. The discussion may also point out the possible uncertainties of alternative decisions and outcomes. 68 2 A reasoned discussion which makes use of economic information and clear analysis to evaluate economic issues and situations. The answer may lack some depth and development may be one-sided. There is relevant use of economic concepts, terminology, information and data appropriate to the question. 35 1 There is a simple attempt at using economic definitions and terminology. Some reference may be made to economic theory, with occasional understanding. 12 0 A mark of zero should be awarded for no creditable content. 0

Question 17

(a) Calculate Tunisia’s balance on the current account of its balance of payments. [1] (b) Identify two qualities of a good tax that the Tu…

Accepted Answer

1(a) Calculate Tunisia’s balance on the current account of its balance of payments. –$2.4bn 1 Accept –2.4bn. Also accept –6.8 or –6.9 billion TND. 1(b) Identify two qualities of a good tax that the Tunisian government aimed to achieve. Efficiency / efficient / the tax should improve market performance / reduce market failure (1). Economical / economy / the tax should raise more in revenue than it costs to collect it (1). 2 If more than 2 qualities are given, consider the first 3. 1(c) Explain one reason why the Tunisian government regulates the price of flour and milk. Reduce poverty (1) flour and milk are basic necessities / essential products / people may be able to buy enough basic necessities / make them affordable / keep price relatively low (1). Or Prevent monopoly firms exploiting their market power (1) stop the firms raising price to a high level (1). 2 One mark for a reason identified and one mark for an explanation. Question Answer Marks Guidance 1(d) Explain two ways the Tunisian government tried to reduce frictional unemployment. Logical explanation which might include: Increased the labour market information available to workers and employers (1) so workers would be more aware of job vacancies / skills and qualifications required / employers more aware of those seeking jobs / may enable workers to move more quickly/easily between jobs / reduce search time / increase mobility of workers (1). Did not raise unemployment benefit (in line with inflation) (1) so, the purchasing power of unemployment benefit would fall / increase the incentive to work (1). 4 One mark for each of two ways identified and one mark for each of two explanations. If more than 2 ways are given, consider the first 3. Question Answer Marks Guidance 1(e) Analyse the relationship between the change in Tunisia’s average wage and the inflation rate. Relationship (up to 2 marks) Direct relationship / positive relationship (1) as change in the average wage increases so does the inflation rate / if change in average wage / rise in average wage falls so does the inflation rate / both fall and rose together / same trend (1). Evidence (up to 3 marks) 2016 – 2017 / 2018 both the average wage / change in average wage and inflation rate rose (1). Between 2014 – 2018, the average wage rose more rapidly than the inflation rate (1) real wages would have increased between 2014 – 2018 (1). Between 2018 – 2020 / in 2019 – 2020, the inflation rate was higher than the rise in the average wage (1) real wages would have fallen (1). Between 2014 – 2015/2016 / 2018 – 2019/2020 both the change in average wage and inflation rate fell (1). 2018 had the highest rise in the average wage and the highest inflation (1). 2016 had the lowest increase in the inflation rate but not the lowest increase in the average wage / 2020 had the lowest increase in the average wage but not the lowest inflation rate (1). Over the whole period the inflation rate rose while the increase in the average wage fell (1). Explanation (up to 2 marks) A rise in the average wage may increase costs of production / cause cost push inflation / a higher inflation rate will encourage workers to press for a wage rise (1). A rise in the average wage may increase disposable income / consumer expenditure / total demand / cause demand-pull inflation (1). 4 Responses do not have to be in the format suggested but they should address the expected/normal relationship, offer supporting evidence of that, highlight any exceptions to that, and analyse the overall data. Note: average wage did not fall. Question Answer Marks Guidance 1(f) Analyse, using a demand and supply diagram, how an increase in wage costs would affect the market for shoes. Coherent analysis which might include: D&S diagram: Axes correctly labelled – price and quantity or p and q (1). Original demand and supply curves correctly labelled (1). New supply curve shifted to the left (1). Equilibriums – shown by lines P1 and Q1 and P2 and Q2 or equilibrium points marked as E1 and E2 (1). Written analysis: An increase in wage costs would increase costs of production which may raise price (1). 5 Note: higher price needs to be linked to higher costs of production/higher costs/higher wage costs. Question Answer Marks Guidance 1(g) Discuss whether or not the Tunisian government should continue to subsidise electricity production. Award up to 4 marks for logical reasons why it might, which may include:  reduce costs of producing electricity (1) increase supply of electricity (1) lower price of electricity (1) make electricity more affordable / reduce poverty (1)  lower costs of firms that use electricity (1) which may encourage them to expand / attract MNCs / increase output / increase GDP / cause economic growth (1) increase employment / lower unemployment (1)  reduce inflation / firms lower prices (1) make Tunisia’s products more internationally competitive / increase exports / lower imports / improve the current account balance (1)  may reduce pollution / external costs (1) if subsidising green sources of energy (1). Award up to 4 marks for logical reasons why it might not, which may include:  electricity firms may rely on the subsidy (1) may not keep costs low / become inefficient (1) may not pass on the subsidy in the form of lower price (1)  opportunity cost (1) government could spend money on e.g. healthcare (1)  may result in a budget deficit / increase in taxes (1)  may cause pollution / external costs (1) if e.g. coal powered / deplete non-renewable resources (1). 6 Apply this example to all questions with the command word DISCUSS (1g, 1h, 2d, 3d, 4d and 5d) Each point may be credited only once, on either side of an argument, but separate development as to how/why the outcome may differ is rewarded. Generic example Mark Tax revenue may decrease… 1 ...because of reason e.g. incomes may be lower. 1 Tax revenue may increase because incomes may be higher i.e. reverse of a previous argument. 0 Tax revenue may increase because of a different reason i.e. not the reverse of a previous argument e.g. government spending on subsidies may stimulate the economy more than spending on education. 1 Question Answer Marks Guidance 1(h) Discuss whether or not a rise in the value of the Tunisian dinar would benefit the Tunisian economy. Award up to 4 marks for logical reasons why it might, which may include:  may reduce inflation (1) imports would be cheaper (1) enable households to buy more imports / higher purchasing power (1) more choice (1) may lower price of some raw materials and/or capital goods (1) increase competitive pressure on domestic firms (1) lower costs of production (1)  lower total (aggregate) demand (1) which may reduce demand-pull inflation (1)  may be taken as an indicator of a strong economy / increase confidence (1) encourage investment / attract MNCs (1)  if demand for exports is price inelastic, export revenue may rise (1). Award up to 4 marks for logical reasons why it might not, which may include:  higher export prices / may reduce exports / export revenue (1) lower price of imports (1) may increase imports / import expenditure (1) reduce international competitiveness (1) increase the deficit / reduce surplus on the current account of Tunisia’s balance of payments (1)  lower net exports may reduce GDP / economic growth (1) which may increase unemployment / reduce employment (1)  may discourage MNCs / investment (1) because of higher cost of setting up in the country (1). 6 Note: lower total demand may be credited on either side but only once. Note: the generic advice above in terms of MNCs. One mark for attract or discourage MNCs. Another mark could be gained by explaining why they may be attracted and another mark for explaining why they may be discouraged.

Question 18

Tajikistan is one of Asia’s low-income countries. Its currency, the somoni, has the key characteristics of money. More than one million Taj…

Accepted Answer

4(a) Identify two reasons why tax revenue is likely to fall during a recession. Two from:  lower spending / lower demand  lower incomes / lower wages / higher unemployment / lower employment  lower profits  lower tax rates  lower imports  fewer tax payers  lower output  lower revenue 2 If more than 2 reasons are given, consider the first 3. 4(b) Explain two characteristics of money. Logical explanation which might include: Generally acceptable (1) people willing to accept it as a payment / reward / in settlement of a debt (1). Portable (1) easy to carry (1). Recognisable (1) easy to see it is the country’s currency (1). Durable (1) will last some time / can be saved (1). Limited in supply (1) so maintains value (1). Divisible (1) there should be units of different value (1). Homogeneous / uniform (1) people not preferring e.g. one note of a certain value other another note of the same value (1). 4 One mark each for each of two characteristics identified and one mark for each of two explanations. If more than 2 characteristics are given, consider the first 3. Accepting ‘breakable’ for ‘divisible’. Explanation marks e.g. maintain value or accept as a payment can be given without identification up to a maximum of 2 marks. Question Answer Marks Guidance 4(c) Analyse the advantages an economy may gain from having some of its people working in other countries. Coherent analysis which might include: The workers may send money home to (support) their families staying at home (1) reduce poverty / raise living standards (1). Will improve the current account position of the balance of payments / bring in foreign currency (1) secondary income (1). The workers may receive training (1) gain skills (1) ideas / knowledge / awareness of new technology (1) experience (1) higher productivity / efficiency (1) which they can bring back to the country (1) increase quality of output (1). Start their own firms in the country when they return (1) increase output / economic growth / increase GDP (1). May reduce unemployment (1) if lack of jobs at home (1) and so may reduce government spending on unemployment benefits / may reduce government spending on dependents (1). 6 No marks for general benefits of emigration. Question Answer Marks Guidance 4(d) Discuss whether or not consumers would benefit from firms buying new capital equipment. In assessing each answer, use the table opposite. Why they might:  may embody new technology  more innovation / new products  may increase efficiency / lower costs of production  may lower prices  may reduce mistakes  increase quality of output  may increase output and so availability. Why they might not:  may raise prices in the short run to cover the cost of the purchase  may reduce quality / output in the short run as workers get used to the new capital equipment  firms may switch from producing consumer to capital goods  products may become more standardised. 8 Focus should be on consumers and not workers. Level Description Marks 3 A reasoned discussion which accurately examines both sides of the economic argument, making use of economic information and clear and logical analysis to evaluate economic issues and situations. One side of the argument may have more depth than the other, but overall both sides of the argument are considered and developed. There is thoughtful evaluation of economic concepts, terminology, information and/or data appropriate to the question. The discussion may also point out the possible uncertainties of alternative decisions and outcomes. 6–8 2 A reasoned discussion which makes use of economic information and clear analysis to evaluate economic issues and situations. The answer may lack some depth and development may be one-sided. There is relevant use of economic concepts, terminology, information and data appropriate to the question. 3–5 Question Answer Marks Guidance 4(d) Level Description Marks 1 There is a simple attempt at using economic definitions and terminology. Some reference may be made to economic theory, with occasional understanding. 1–2 0 A mark of zero should be awarded for no creditable content. 0

Question 19

Free goods and economic goods are consumed in Poland. In 2020, demand for both economic goods and factors of production increased in Poland…

Accepted Answer

5(a) Identify two free goods. Two from e.g.:  air / oxygen  sunlight  water  wind 2 BOD on ‘sun’, trees (not wood), wild flowers, wild fruit. Not accepting fish or stone. 5(b) Explain two influences on demand for factors of production. Logical explanation which might include: Demand for the product produced / total demand / economic activity (1) rise in demand for the product/products will be likely to increase demand for the factor/factors of production / derived demand (1). Price of the factor itself (1) lower price will be likely to result in higher demand (1). Price of substitute factors of production (1) e.g. may demand more labour if price of capital rises (1). Price of complementary factors of production (1) e.g. if labour is used with capital, a fall in the price of capital may increase demand for labour (1). Productivity (1) higher productivity will be likely to increase demand (1). Quality / advances in technology / changes in standards of education and training (1) higher quality will increase demand (1). Occupational mobility (1) the more occupationally mobile, the higher demand will tend to be (1). Method of production (1) switch from labour-intensive production will increase demand for capital goods (1). 4 One mark each for each of two influences identified and one mark for each of two explanations. If more than 2 influences are given, consider the first 3. Accept price and / or demand on its own but looking for price of a complement or price of a substitute not just complement or substitute. Question Answer Marks Guidance 5(c) Analyse the effect of an increase in demand for football shirts on demand for football shorts and demand for basketball shirts. Coherent analysis which might include: Demand for football shorts is likely to increase (1) football shirts and shorts are complements (1) bought to be used together / bought to complete the set (1). Demand for basketball shirts is likely to fall (1) basketball shirts and football shirts may be substitutes (1) consumers may switch between them (1). 6 Changes in demand may be shown in the written answer or on diagrams. Question Answer Marks Guidance 5(d) Discuss whether or not an increase in government spending on housing would benefit an economy. In assessing each answer, use the table opposite. Why it might:  may increase total demand  may increase output / GDP  may increase employment / reduce unemployment  may lower the price of housing  may increase living standards  may reduce homelessness  may reduce poverty. Why it might not:  will have an opportunity cost  may increase taxes  quality of housing may be low  private sector may provide better housing  may be external costs during the construction. 8 Level Description Marks 3 A reasoned discussion which accurately examines both sides of the economic argument, making use of economic information and clear and logical analysis to evaluate economic issues and situations. One side of the argument may have more depth than the other, but overall both sided of the argument are considered and developed. There is thoughtful evaluation of economic concepts, terminology, information and/or data appropriate to the question. The discussion may also point out the possible uncertainties of alternative decisions and outcomes. 6–8 2 A reasoned discussion which makes use of economic information and clear analysis to evaluate economic issues and situations. The answer may lack some depth and development may be one-sided. There is relevant use of economic concepts, terminology, information and data appropriate to the question. 3–5 1 There is a simple attempt at using economic definitions and terminology. Some reference may be made to economic theory, with occasional understanding. 1–2 Question Answer Marks Guidance 5(d) Level Description Marks 0 A mark of zero should be awarded for no creditable content. 0

Question 20

In 2023, India became the country with the largest population. This may affect the government’s macroeconomic aims. In 2018, the Indian Gov…

Accepted Answer

4(a) Identify two macroeconomic aims of government that 2 If more than two macroeconomic aims given, consider the may conflict. first three. • Full employment / low unemployment (1) and price Allow any macroeconomic aim. stability (1). • Economic growth (1) current account balance (1). • Price stability (1) redistribution of income / poverty reduction (1). • Economic growth (1) economic sustainability (1). 4(b) Explain two reasons why a country may have a high 4 One mark each for each of two reasons identified and one population growth rate. mark each for each of two explanations. Logical explanation which might include: If more than two reasons given, consider the first three. • High birth rate (1) due to e.g. low age of marriage / lack of education on birth control (1). • Low death rate / high life expectancy (1) due to e.g. good quality healthcare (1). • Immigration /net immigration (1) due to e.g. high incomes (1). • High fertility rates (1) due to e.g. young female population (1). • Birth rate higher than the death rate (1) results in higher natural growth rate (1). 4(c) Analyse how a cut in the corporation (corporate income) 6 Do not credit answers that refer to income tax or any other tax rate can increase economic growth. tax than corporation tax. Coherent analysis which might include: • Cut in corporation (corporate income) tax will increase the amount of profits that can be kept by firms (1) may attract MNCs to country (1) this will increase the funds firms have to spend (1) on capital goods (1) and increase incentive to invest (1) more to spend on wages (1) may create job opportunities / reduce unemployment (1) raise consumer expenditure (1) firms grow faster (1). • Higher investment (1) will increase total demand (1). It may also increase the quality of capital goods (1) may introduce new technology (1) may increase productivity /productive capacity (1) increase output / GDP (1). • Provide an incentive to enterprise (1) as more profits can be retained / higher profits (1). 4(d) Discuss whether or not a decrease in government 8 Level Description Marks spending will reduce inflation. 3 A reasoned discussion which accurately 6–8 In assessing each answer, use the table opposite. examines both sides of the economic argument, making use of economic Why it might: information and clear and logical • may reduce total demand analysis to evaluate economic issues • lower total demand may reduce demand-pull inflation and situations. One side of the • if near full employment, lower demand may have a argument may have more depth than significant impact on inflation the other, but overall both sides of the • may reduce need for taxes, lower indirect taxes may argument are considered and reduce prices. developed. There is thoughtful evaluation of economic concepts, Why it might not: terminology, information and/or data • lower government subsidies may raise prices appropriate to the question. The • lower government spending on education and training discussion may also point out the may reduce productivity and may increase cost of possible uncertainties of alternative production decisions and outcomes. • lower government spending on infrastructure could increase transport costs 2 A reasoned discussion which makes 3–5 • higher costs of production may increase cost-push use of economic information and clear inflation analysis to evaluate economic issues • may be other causes of inflation e.g. rise in wages. and situations. The answer may lack some depth and development may be one-sided. There is relevant use of economic concepts, terminology, information and data appropriate to the question. 4(d) 8 Level Description Marks 1 There is a simple attempt at using 1–2 economic definitions and terminology. Some reference may be made to economic theory, with occasional understanding. 0 A mark of zero should be awarded for 0 no creditable content.

Question 21

(a) Calculate St. Kitts and Nevis’s government budget deficit in 2022. [1] (b) Identify two examples of the factor of production ‘land’ in …

Accepted Answer

Question Answer Mark Guidance 1(a) Calculate St. Kitts and Nevis’s Government budget 1 Accept 18m. deficit in 2022. ($)18 000 000 / – ($)18 000 000. $18 m / – $18 m (1). 1(b) Identify two examples of the factor of production land in 2 If more than two examples given, consider the first three. St. Kitts and Nevis. Two from: beaches (1), (coral) reefs (1), marine life / fish (1) rainforests (1) and soil (1). 1(c) Explain how tourism causes external costs in St. Kitts 2 One mark for explanation of external costs. and Nevis. One mark for example based on tourism. • Social costs are greater than private costs / social costs include private costs and external costs / harmful effects on third parties / those not directly involved in producing or consuming the product (1). • Example of an external cost caused by tourism in St Kitts and Nevis e.g. pollution / environmental damage / death of wildlife / death of marine life / overcrowding (1). 1(d) Explain two reasons why a foreign bank may open a 4 One mark each for each of two reasons identified and one branch in St. Kitts and Nevis. mark each for each of two explanations. Logical explanation which might include: If more than two reasons given, consider the first three. • High incomes in the country (1) high demand for Most of the explanation points e.g. high profit could be banking services / high demand for loans / may save linked to any of the three identification points except high more / borrowers likely to be able to repay loans / high disposable income should be linked to absence of personal profit / high revenue (1). income tax. • Absence (low) of personal income tax (1) workers would be able to keep all of their income / more disposable Do not give two explanation marks for one identification. income / firms may be able to pay lower wages / increase workers’ motivation (1). Explanation marks here are dependent on the • Relatively high literacy rates (1) awareness of benefits identifications. of having a bank account / saving / skilled workers / high productivity (1). 1(e) Draw a demand and supply diagram to show the effect 4 of an increase in the productivity of onion farmers on the market for onions. D&S diagram: Axes correctly labelled – price and quantity or p and q (1). Original demand and supply curves correctly labelled (1). New supply curve shifted to the right (1). Equilibriums – shown by lines P1 and Q1 and P2 and Q2 or equilibrium points marked as E1 and E2 (1). 1(f) Analyse the relationship between healthcare spending 5 Responses do not have to be in the format suggested but as a percentage of GDP and life expectancy. they should address the expected/normal relationship, offer supporting evidence of that, highlight any exceptions to that, Expected relationship: and analyse the overall data. Direct / positive relationship (1). Generally, the higher healthcare spending, the higher the life expectancy (1). Supporting evidence should involve interpretation, not just description. Supporting evidence: E.g.: Haiti has the second lowest % healthcare spending and the shortest life expectancy (1) Canada spends a higher % on healthcare than Egypt and has a longer life expectancy / Canada spends the highest percentage on health care and has the second highest longest life expectancy / Canada and Sweden spend a high % on healthcare and have long life expectancy (1). Analysis of the supporting information: Higher spending on healthcare would be expected to raise the health of the population / provide better quality healthcare (1) increase awareness of need for healthy living / provide more check-ups / preventative medical care / reduce the death rate (1). Exception: Monaco (1) spends the lowest % on healthcare but has the longest life expectancy (1). Analysis of exception: 1.9% of a very high GDP can mean higher spending than e.g. 12.9% of a lower GDP / Monaco may have a high GDP (1). There are other influences on life expectancy e.g. nutrition / education/housing/war (1). 1(g) Discuss whether or not an increase in the size of its 6 Award one mark in total for higher / lower average costs, fishing industry would benefit St. Kitts and Nevis. one mark for lower / higher fish prices, one mark for higher / lower profits (1). Award up to 4 marks for logical reasons why it might, which may include: Higher / lower profits should be linked to the fishing industry. • may reduce imports of fish (1) reduce risk of supply-side shocks / imports being cut off (1) enable fish to be Apply this example to all questions with the command exported (1) may improve the current account word DISCUSS balance / improve the balance of payments (1) (1(g), 1(h), 2(d), 3(d), 4(d) and 5(d)) • may increase employment / increase job opportunities / reduce unemployment (1) raise incomes Each point may be credited only once, on either side of an (1) increase living standards (1) increase argument, but separate development as to how/why the GDP / increase output / cause economic growth (1) outcome may differ is rewarded. higher tax revenue (1) • may enable greater advantage to be taken of Generic example Mark economies of scale (1) example (1) lower average cost (1) lower fish prices (1) Tax revenue may decrease … 1 • (larger boats) may be more efficient / more productive (1) make the industry more profitable / increase profits ... because of reason e.g. incomes may be 1 from fishing (1). lower. Tax revenue may increase because incomes 0 may be higher i.e. reverse of a previous argument. Tax revenue may increase because of a different 1 reason i.e. not the reverse of a previous argument e.g. government spending on subsidies may stimulate the economy more than spending on education. 1(g) Award up to 4 marks for logical reasons why it might not, which may include: • opportunity cost (1) could use resources in other industries / government can spend more on e.g. education / increase budget deficit (1) • over-fishing (1) deplete fish stocks / lose marine life / deplete resources (1) raise fish prices in the long run (1) • may experience diseconomies of scale (1) example (1) higher average cost (1) reduce profit (1) • may cause external costs / environmental harm (1) may damage coral reefs / cause pollution (1) harm tourism (1) • may be a dangerous occupation (1) may be low-paid (1) low-skilled (1) may experience seasonal unemployment (1) • risk of over specialisation / too great a dependency on the industry (1) may be harmed by a fall in demand for fish / rise in competition from other countries (1). 1(h) Discuss whether or not deflation is likely to have 6 Award one mark for malign (bad) deflation is harmful harmed St. Kitts and Nevis. whereas benign (good) deflation is beneficial. Award up to 4 marks for logical reasons why it might, which Mark for higher employment and mark for higher GDP can may include: only be awarded if come from higher total supply. • may have increased real value of debt (1) may default (1) may have decreased investment (1) ‘save more’ may be credited on either side but only once. • may have resulted in a deflationary spiral (1) may have resulted from lower total demand (1) lower GDP / lower output / reduce economic growth / may cause a recession (1) lower employment / increased unemployment (1) lowered wages / income (1) • may reduce confidence (1) may discourage MNCs (1) • may reduce consumer expenditure / save more / create uncertainty (1) delay buying goods and services (until price is lower) (1). Award up to 4 marks for logical reasons why it might not, which may include: • may have increased purchasing power / real income / with the same income more goods and services can be purchased (1) (some) people may spend / consume more (1) • value of saving may have increased (1) increasing wealth (1) • may be the result of higher total supply (1) due to advances in technology / lower costs of production (1) higher output / economic growth (1) higher employment (1) • may have increased international competitiveness of its products / lower export prices (1) increased exports / export revenue (1) reduced imports / import expenditure (1) improve current account balance (1).

Question 22

In 2022, more than a quarter of a million workers, including doctors, left Sri Lanka to work in other countries. This was largely due to ec…

Accepted Answer

4(a) Identify two types of unemployment. 2 If more than two types given, consider the first three. Two from: Also accept voluntary unemployment, involuntary Frictional (1) structural (1) cyclical / demand deficient (1) unemployment, seasonal, classical, casual, regional, technological. Accept demand-deficient as an alternative to cyclical. 4(b) Explain two ways that money received from relatives 4 One mark each for each of two ways identified and one working abroad could raise their families’ living mark each for each of two explanations. standards. If more than two ways given, consider the first three. Logical explanation which might include: No marks for why the money received may be large due to Could spend more on food / buy more products / buy more e.g. lower tax rates abroad, high exchange rate. basic necessities have higher purchasing power / more income / could increase overall spending (1) reduce poverty (1). Could spend more on better quality food (1) improve nutrition / improve health (1). Could spend money on education / training (1) increase earning potential / wages (1). Could spend on healthcare (1) raise life expectancy (1). Could spend on housing (1) reduce illness (1). May be able to afford luxuries (1) e.g. may be able to afford a holiday / car (1). Could set up a small business (1) which could earn them an income (1) Could pay off debts / reduce need to borrow / reduce cost of borrowing (1) reduce stress (1). Could save more (1) earn interest / pay for e.g. healthcare/education of children in the future (1) Could work fewer hours / fewer jobs (1) less stress (1). 4(c) Analyse how an increase in direct taxation could 6 increase unemployment. Coherent analysis which might include: • (Increase in) (personal) income tax (1) (increase in) tax on wealth (1) would reduce disposable income / purchasing power / money available / the amount of their wages they can keep (1) reduce consumer spending (1) lower total demand (1) lower demand for workers (1) as demand for workers depends on demand for goods and services / derived demand (1) increase cyclical unemployment (1). • Reduce incentive to work / encourage workers to leave their jobs (1) may now rely on unemployment benefit / as may receive more from unemployment benefit than from a now lower paid job (1) increase frictional/voluntary unemployment (1). • (Increase in) corporation (corporate income) tax (1) will reduce the amount of profit that can be kept / reduce profit (1) firms may reduce output / reduce economic growth / may cause a recession / reduce supply / less incentive to expand (1) reduce investment (1) result in cyclical unemployment (1) may reduce employment to cut costs (to maintain profit) (1). 4(d) Discuss whether or not a doctor would benefit from 8 Maximum of 4 marks if discussing working in another city working in another country. rather than country. In assessing each answer, use the table opposite. Level Description Marks Why they might: 3 A reasoned discussion which accurately 6–8 • may be higher paid, higher living standards examines both sides of the economic • may benefit from lower inflation argument, making use of economic • may benefit from lower taxes information and clear and logical • may be more chances of gaining a job or gaining a analysis to evaluate economic issues promoted post and situations. One side of the argument • may have better working conditions may have more depth than the other, but • may have more fringe benefits overall both sides of the argument are • may gain new skills and experience considered and developed. There is • may be safer environment thoughtful evaluation of economic • may be able to send money home to family concepts, terminology, information • may provide better opportunities for their children. and/or data appropriate to the question. The discussion may also point out the Why they might not: possible uncertainties of alternative • may have longer working hours decisions and outcomes. • may have less holidays 2 A reasoned discussion which makes use 3–5 • may have less job security of economic information and clear • may miss friends / relatives analysis to evaluate economic issues • may face discrimination and situations. The answer may lack • may face language problems/ cultural differences. some depth and development may be one-sided. There is relevant use of economic concepts, terminology, information and data appropriate to the question. 4(d) Level Description Marks 1 There is a simple attempt at using 1–2 economic definitions and terminology. Some reference may be made to economic theory, with occasional understanding. 0 A mark of zero should be awarded for no 0 creditable content.

Question 23

There are several policy measures a central bank or government can use to reduce unemployment. One policy measure a government could use to…

Accepted Answer

4(a) Identify two policy measures a central bank could use to 2 If more than two measures are given, consider the first maintain price stability. three. Two from: the rate of interest (1) the money supply (1) the exchange rate (1) quantitative easing / tightening (1). 4(b) Explain two benefits to an economy of full employment. 4 One mark each for two benefits identified and one mark each for two explanations. Logical explanation which might include the following. • High output / GDP (1) maximum use of labour resource. • High tax revenue (1) government could spend on e.g. education / healthcare (1). • Low spending on state benefits (1) can keep taxes low / money saved can be spent on other things (1). • Low poverty / increase incomes (1) enable people to purchase basic necessities / which could increase living standards (1). 4(c) Analyse how an increase in government spending on 6 Reward, but do not expect reference to multiplier / multiplier building houses could reduce unemployment. effects. Coherent analysis which might include the following. An increase in government spending on building homes may increase demand for building workers (1) may increase demand for building materials (1) demand for building materials workers / other workers related to building industry (1) labour is a derived demand (1) reduce structural unemployment (1) increase incomes (1) increase consumer expenditure (1) increase total demand (1) reduce cyclical unemployment (1) increase GDP / economic growth (1) may increase quality of homes (1) improve health (1) fewer workers may lose their jobs because of illness (1) increase labour productivity which may increase demand for labour (1) increase supply of houses (1) reduce price of houses (1) improve mobility of labour (1). 4(d) Discuss whether or not an increase in a country’s 8 Level Description Marks economic growth rate will increase its HDI value. 3 A reasoned discussion which accurately 6–8 In assessing each answer, use the table opposite. examines both sides of the economic argument, making use of economic Why it might: information and clear and logical • increase in GDP may increase GDP per head if analysis to evaluate economic issues increase in GDP is greater than any rise in population and situations. One side of the • higher GDP per head may increase spending on good argument may have more depth than nutrition / good housing and as a result increase life the other, but overall, both sides of the expectancy argument are considered and • higher GDP per head may increase tax revenue, developed. There is thoughtful enabling a government to spend on education and evaluation of economic concepts, healthcare terminology, information and/or data • higher GDP per head may enable families to keep their appropriate to the question. The children in education for longer. discussion may also point out the possible uncertainties of alternative Why it might not: decisions and outcomes. • higher GDP per head may result in more spending on demerit goods, lowering life expectancy 2 A reasoned discussion which makes 3–5 • may lead to inflation hindering access to healthcare and use of economic information and clear education and increase inequality in the distribution of analysis to evaluate economic issues income and situations. The answer may lack • may be the result of higher military expenditure which some depth and development may be will not increase HDI one-sided. There is relevant use of • income may become more unevenly distributed, economic concepts, terminology, meaning life expectancy and years of education of the information and data appropriate to the poor may fall question. • more pollution may be created, lowering life expectancy • working hours and stress may increase, lowering life expectancy. 4(d) Level Description Marks 1 There is a simple attempt at using 1–2 economic definitions and terminology. Some reference may be made to economic theory, with occasional understanding. 0 A mark of zero should be awarded for 0 no creditable content.

Question	Answer	Marks	From
1	see sheet	30	0987/21 May/June 2020
2	see sheet	20	0987/21 May/June 2020
3	see sheet	20	0987/22 May/June 2020
4	see sheet	20	0987/22 May/June 2020
5	see sheet	20	0987/22 Oct/Nov 2020
6	see sheet	20	0987/22 Oct/Nov 2020
7	see sheet	30	0987/21 May/June 2021
8	see sheet	20	0987/22 Oct/Nov 2021
9	see sheet	30	0987/21 May/June 2022
10	see sheet	20	0987/21 May/June 2022
11	see sheet	30	0987/22 May/June 2022
12	see sheet	30	0987/22 Oct/Nov 2022
13	see sheet	20	0987/22 Oct/Nov 2022
14	see sheet	30	0987/21 May/June 2023
15	see sheet	20	0987/21 May/June 2023
16	see sheet	20	0987/21 May/June 2024
17	see sheet	30	0987/22 May/June 2024
18	see sheet	20	0987/22 May/June 2024
19	see sheet	20	0987/22 May/June 2024
20	see sheet	20	0987/21 May/June 2025
21	see sheet	30	0987/22 May/June 2025
22	see sheet	20	0987/22 May/June 2025
23	see sheet	20	0987/22 Oct/Nov 2025

Fiscal policy — Paper 2 · IGCSE Economics (9-1) 0987

Questions8 pages

Mark scheme23 answers

Another paper, or another topic

Questions as text

Q1 · Calculate Vietnam’s GDP per head in 2017 0987/21 May/June 2020

Q2 · Economists are uncertain about the future United States (US) macroeconomic performance 0987/21 May/June 2020

Q3 · In 2017, the Japanese government announced improvements to its tax system 0987/22 May/June 2020

Q4 · Mali is a low income and low productivity country in Africa 0987/22 May/June 2020

Q5 · Mexico has a history of trade deficits 0987/22 Oct/Nov 2020

Q6 · The population of Hungary is the most obese in Europe 0987/22 Oct/Nov 2020

Q7 · Calculate the value of Nigeria’s exports of goods in 2017 0987/21 May/June 2021

Q8 · The US operates a mainly market economic system 0987/22 Oct/Nov 2021

Q9 · Calculate the number of births in Cyprus in 2019 0987/21 May/June 2022

Q10 · Australia’s foreign exchange rate fluctuates 0987/21 May/June 2022

Q11 · Calculate Bhutan’s GDP in 2018 0987/22 May/June 2022

Q12 · Calculate how many dollars 6400 Nigerian naira would have bought in 2019 0987/22 Oct/Nov 2022

Q13 · In 2019, Russia had an unemployment rate of 4.6% 0987/22 Oct/Nov 2022

Q14 · Calculate Australia’s unemployment rate in 2021 0987/21 May/June 2023

Q15 · Living standards, including education, have improved for most people in South Africa in… 0987/21 May/June 2023

Q16 · In 2020, the price of gold fell in Vietnam 0987/21 May/June 2024

Q17 · Calculate Tunisia’s balance on the current account of its balance of payments 0987/22 May/June 2024

Q18 · Tajikistan is one of Asia’s low-income countries 0987/22 May/June 2024

Q19 · Free goods and economic goods are consumed in Poland 0987/22 May/June 2024

Q20 · In 2023, India became the country with the largest population 0987/21 May/June 2025

Question 21 0987/22 May/June 2025

Q22 · In 2022, more than a quarter of a million workers, including doctors, left Sri Lanka to… 0987/22 May/June 2025

Q23 · There are several policy measures a central bank or government can use to reduce… 0987/22 Oct/Nov 2025