Factors of production — Paper 2 · IGCSE Economics (9-1) 0987

1 (a) Calculate Vietnam’s GDP per head in 2017. [1] (b) Identify two rewards to factors of production. [2] (c) Explain what happened to Vietnam’s foreign exchange rate between 2010 and 2017. [2] (d) Explain two benefits an economy may gain from having a young labour force. [4] (e) Analyse why Vietnam’s budget deficit may decline in the future. [4] (f) Analyse the relationship between government spending on education and the percentage of the labour force employed in the tertiary sector. [5] (g) Discuss whether or not an increase in competition is likely to benefit Vietnamese consumers. [6] (h) Discuss whether or not the increase in borrowing is likely to have caused inflation in Vietnam in 2017. [6]

30 marks

Mark scheme: Question Answer Marks 1(a) Calculate Vietnam’s GDP per head in 2017. 1 $6900 (1). 1(b) Identify two rewards to factors of production. 2 Wages (1) profits (1). 1(c) Explain what happened to Vietnam’s foreign exchange rate between 2 2010 and 2017. Logical explanation which might include: It fell/depreciated (1) more dong had to be given to buy one dollar (1). 1(d) Explain two benefits an economy may gain from having a young 4 labour force. Logical explanation which might include: May be more flexible (1) switch from doing different tasks (1). May be more mobile (1) able to switch from one job to another or from one place to another place (1). May be more up to date with advances in technology (1) more productive/able to use advanced technology (1). 1(e) Analyse why Vietnam’s budget deficit may decline in the future. 4 Coherent analysis which might include: High economic growth will raise incomes/wages rising (1) higher profits (1) more revenue from direct taxes (1) higher incomes is likely to result in more spending (1) more revenue from indirect taxes (1). Tax rates may be increased (1) reducing the gap between tax revenue and government spending (1). Deregulation / privatisation may increase profits (1) resulting in higher revenue from direct taxes /corporation tax (1). 1(f) Analyse the relationship between government spending on education 5 and the percentage of the labour force employed in the tertiary sector. Coherent analysis which might include: Generally the countries with the highest % spending on education have the highest percentage employed in the tertiary sector and vice versa (1) up to two examples e.g. Norway has the highest % spending and the highest % employed in the tertiary sector, Bangladesh has the lowest % spending and the lowest % employed in the tertiary sector (2) the main exception is Vietnam – second highest % spending but lowest % employed in the tertiary sector (1) there may be a time lag in this case (1). It is the expected relationship as some tertiary jobs require high skills (1) countries that can afford to devote a high percentage of resources to education may have achieved a relatively high level of development (1) a higher percent spent will create jobs in education (1). 1(g) Discuss whether or not an increase in competition is likely to benefit 6 Vietnamese consumers. Apply this example to all questions with the command word DISCUSS (1g, 1h, 2d, 3d, 4d and 5d) Each point may be credited only once, on either side of an argument, but separate development as to how/why the outcome may differ is rewarded. Generic example mark Tax revenue may decrease… 1 ...because of reason e.g. incomes may be lower. 1 Tax revenue may increase because incomes may be higher i.e. 0 reverse of a previous argument. Tax revenue may increase because of a different reason i.e. not the reverse of a previous argument e.g. government spending on 1 subsidies may stimulate the economy more than spending on education. Award up to 4 marks for logical reasons why it might, which may include: • prices may be reduced to attract more consumers (1) making them more affordable to consumers (1) • choice will be increased in terms of sellers (1) and possibly in terms of a greater range of products (1) • quality may rise (1) with pressure being put on producers to produce good products to attract consumers (1) • producers may respond more fully to changes in consumer demand (1) Award up to 4 marks for logical reasons why it might not, which may include: • firms may be smaller (1), less able to take advantage of economies of scale (1), so prices may be higher (1) • firms may have less profit (1) and so spend less improving the quality of the product (1) • some firms may be MNCs (1), less concerned about causing external costs (1) 1(h) Discuss whether or not the increase in borrowing is likely to have 6 caused inflation in Vietnam in 2017. Award up to 4 marks for logical reasons why it might, which may include: • higher consumer demand (1) and investment (1) will increase total (aggregate) demand (1) • higher total demand may cause demand-pull inflation/cause producers to raise prices (1) • government spending may rise, further adding to total (aggregate) demand (1) • the economy has very low unemployment/full employment (1) making it difficult for supply to respond to higher demand (1) • tax rates may rise (1) which may increase costs of production (1) causing cost-push inflation (1) Award up to 4 marks for logical reasons why it might not, which may include: • higher investment may reduce costs of production (1) lowering cost- push inflation (1) • higher consumer spending may enable firms to grow (1) and take greater advantage of economies of scale (1) • increased education (1) may raise labour productivity (1), reduce costs of production (1) and lower cost-push inflation (1) • privatised firms may be more efficient (1) • more competition may reduce price rises (1)

This question in 0987/21 May/June 2020

3 There is a smaller proportion of large firms in Africa than in Asia. The two African countries with the largest firms are Nigeria and South Africa. These two countries’ firms have more capital goods than most other African countries’ firms. Firms in South Africa produce a range of products including gold and petrochemicals. In recent years, a number of African firms have developed into multinational companies (MNCs), producing mainly in other African countries. (a) Define a capital good. [2] (b) Explain two challenges facing small firms. [4] (c) Analyse, using a demand and supply diagram, how a rise in income may affect the market for gold. [6] (d) Discuss whether or not MNCs increase production and productivity in their host countries. [8]

20 marks

Mark scheme: 3(a) Define a capital good. 2 Human-made good (1) used in production/used to produce other goods and services (1). 3(b) Explain two challenges facing small firms. 4 Logical explanation which might include: Lack of finance/difficulty raising finance (1) banks may be more reluctant to lend to small firms (1). May not be able to take advantage of economies of scale (1) may have higher average cost (1). Not well known (1) difficult to attract consumers (1). May face fierce competition from large firms (1) which may lower their prices/spend more on advertising (1). Risk of failure (1) due to inexperience of owners (1). 3(c) Analyse, using a demand and supply diagram, how a rise in income 6 may affect the market for gold. Up to 4 marks for the diagram: Axes correctly labelled – price and quantity or p and q (1). Demand and supply curves correctly labelled (1). Demand curve shifted to the right (1). Equilibriums – shown by lines P1, P2/Q1, Q2 or marking the equilibrium points E1 and E2 (1). Up to 2 marks for logical analysis: An increase in income will increase people’s ability to buy gold/raise purchasing power (1). Price will rise/quantity traded will rise (1). 3(d) Discuss whether or not MNCs increase production and productivity in 8 their host countries. In assessing each answer, use the table below. Level Description Marks 3 A reasoned discussion which accurately examines both 6–8 sides of the economic argument, making use of economic information and clear and logical analysis to evaluate economic issues and situations. One side of the argument may have more depth than the other but, overall, both sides of the argument are considered and developed. There is thoughtful evaluation of economic concepts, terminology, information and/or data appropriate to the question. The discussion may also point out the possible uncertainties of alternative decisions and outcomes. 2 A reasoned discussion which makes use of economic 3–5 information and clear analysis to evaluate economic issues and situations. The answer may lack some depth and development may be one-sided. There is relevant use of economic concepts, terminology, information and data appropriate to the question. 1 There is a simple attempt at using economic definitions 1–2 and terminology. Some reference may be made to economic theory, with occasional understanding. 0 A mark of zero should be awarded for no creditable 0 content. Why they might: • may have high demand for their products • may create demand for raw materials from domestic firms • may bring new technology and working practices into the countries • may train workers • may pay higher wages which may motivate workers. Why it might not: • may drive some domestic firms of business • may deplete natural resources, reducing output in the future • may have long/unsociable working hours • may generate external costs including pollution which may reduce the health of workers. Limit to level 2 if only production or productivity is considered.

This question in 0987/21 May/June 2020

1 (a) Calculate the value of Nigeria’s exports of goods in 2017. [1] (b) Identify two examples of capital goods. [2] (c) Explain whether Nigeria had a budget deficit or a budget surplus in 2017. [2] (d) Explain how government spending on training may increase tax revenue in the long run. [4] (e) Analyse how living standards in Nigeria compare with living standards in Ethiopia in 2017. [4] (f) Analyse how a government could encourage firms to increase their investment. [5] (g) Discuss whether or not an increase in Nigeria’s population will benefit its economy. [6] (h) Discuss whether or not an increase in Nigeria’s import tariff on rice would increase the output of Nigerian rice. [6]

30 marks

Mark scheme: 1(a) Calculate the value of Nigeria’s exports of goods in 2017. $43.1bn 1 $ is not essential. 1(b) Identify two examples of capital goods. Two from: • [delivery] vehicles • machines • [office] equipment 2 1(c) Explain whether Nigeria had a budget deficit or a budget surplus in 2017. • budget deficit (1) • government spending exceeded tax revenue (1) • government spending was $19.5bn and tax revenue was $12.9bn (1) 2 1(d) Explain how government spending on training may increase tax revenue in the long run. Logical explanation which might include: • Training may increase skills of workers (1) raise productivity (1) raise wages / incomes (1) increase job opportunities / employment / reduce unemployment (1) increase income tax revenue (1). • Higher wages may increase spending / demand (1) increase indirect tax revenue (1). • A more productive labour force may reduce costs of production (1) raise profits (1) increase corporation tax revenue (1). 4 Question Answer Marks Guidance 1(e) Analyse how living standards in Nigeria compare with the living standards in Ethiopia in 2017. Coherent analysis which might include: • Nigeria’s higher GDP per head (income) (1) suggests Nigerians may have been able to enjoy more goods and services (1). • Nigeria has a lower life expectancy (1) suggesting poorer healthcare (1). • Nigeria has a higher average number of years spent at school (1) suggesting the labour force may be more educated (1). • Nigeria has a higher percentage of underweight five-year olds (1) suggesting poor nutrition / income inequality (1). • Overall comment: Nigeria’s income per head and average years spent at school suggests a higher living standard but life expectancy and percentage of five years underweight suggests a lower living standard (1). 4 Question Answer Marks Guidance 1(f) Analyse how a government could encourage firms to increase their investment. Coherent analysis which might include: • Reduce the rate of interest (1) making it cheaper to borrow (1) encouraging borrowing as consumer spending is likely to rise (1). • Lower corporation tax (1) increasing the funds available to invest (1) increasing the incentive to invest as return from investment would rise (1). • Create greater economic certainty / confidence (1) by e.g. keeping inflation low and stable / not changing government spending and taxation frequently (1) making it easier for firms to plan / it can take time to get a return from investment (1). • Provide subsidies/grants/loans (1) decreasing cost of investments (1) encouraging MNCs (1). • Raise tariffs (1) increasing demand for home produced goods (1). • Less government regulation/policies (1) reduces costs for firms (1) more willing to invest (1). 5 Question Answer Marks Guidance 1(g) Discuss whether or not an increase in Nigeria’s population will benefit its economy. Award up to 4 marks for why it might: • Fall in death rate (1) may indicate improved healthcare (1). • Total (aggregate) demand will increase (1) may enable existing firms to expand / increase output (1) new firms to set up (1) attract MNCs (1). • Labour force may increase (1) causing total (aggregate) supply to increase / raise productive capacity (1) increase output / GDP (1). • May move country towards optimum population (1) if there are unused resources (1). • Net immigration will increase labour force (1) and reduce dependency ratio (1) • More tax revenue (1) can be spent on improving e.g., public services (1). Award up to 4 marks for why it might not: • Birth rate is rising (1) will increase dependency (1) resources which may have increased economic growth may have to be devoted to rearing the children (1). • Labour force may fall in the short run (1) to look after the children (1). • Pressure will be put on the environment (1) there may be more pollution (1) causing overcrowding / poor health (1). • If food output cannot be increased (1) may be more malnourishment/famine / poverty (1) more food is required / food may have to be imported (1) food prices may increase (1). 6 Apply this example to all questions with the command word DISCUSS (1(g), 1(h), 2(d), 3(d), 4(d) and 5(d)) Each point may be credited only once, on either side of an argument, but separate development as to how/why the outcome may differ is rewarded. Generic example Mark Tax revenue may decrease… 1 ...because of reason e.g. incomes may be lower. 1 Tax revenue may increase because incomes may be higher i.e. reverse of a previous argument. 0 Tax revenue may increase because of a different reason i.e. not the reverse of a previous argument e.g. government spending on subsidies may stimulate the economy more than spending on education. 1 Question Answer Marks Guidance 1(g) • Population is rising but age structure may be changing (1) as there is net emigration of young people (1) may result in reduction in labour force (1). • [Opportunity] cost for government (1) which has to spend on health/education rather than infrastructure (1). • Increase in output to meet demand (1) results in faster usage of resources in country (1) and shortages (1). Question Answer Marks Guidance 1(h) Discuss whether or not an increase in Nigeria’s import tariff on rice would increase the output of Nigerian rice. Award up to 4 marks for why it might: • A higher tariff may raise the price of imported rice (1) may reduce demand for / consumption of imported rice (1) may cause Nigerians to demand more home- produced rice as it is cheaper (1) effect would be greater, the greater the elasticity of demand for the import of rice (1) may enable Nigerian rice farmers to raise their price / make more profit (1). • A tariff may raise government tax revenue (1) some of this could be used to subsidise Nigerian rice farmers / modernise farming methods and so raise productivity (1). Award up to 4 marks for why it might not: • Nigerian farmers are less productive than Asian competitors (1) have high(er) costs of production (1) Nigerian price may still be higher even with the higher import tariff (1). • The supply of Nigerian rice may be price-inelastic (1) so even if Nigerian farmers could sell their rice for more, they may have difficulties adjusting supply (1). • More Nigerian rice will not be sold if quality is poor (1) consumers my prefer the varieties of rice produced in other countries (1) other countries retaliate by imposing higher tariffs (1) current account surplus may be reduced (1). • Increase in import tariffs may be small (1) making little difference to import prices and consumption (1). • Not enough resources/ factors of production e.g., farmers (1) to produce more rice in Nigeria (1). 6

This question in 0987/21 May/June 2021

5 Australia experienced a drought in 2018 which caused its agricultural output to fall. Australia’s secondary and tertiary sectors performed better in 2018 than its primary sector. All three sectors were affected by the measures taken by the central bank to avoid deflation. Some firms benefited from these measures and increased their output. (a) Identify two industries, other than agriculture, that operate in the primary sector. [2] (b) Explain two possible disadvantages to an economy of a fall in agricultural output. [4] (c) Analyse how a central bank could avoid deflation. [6] (d) Discuss whether or not a firm should have growth as its main objective. [8]

20 marks

Mark scheme: 5(a) Identify two industries, other than agriculture, that operate in the primary sector. Two from e.g.: Mining, fishing, forestry, oil extraction 2 5(b) Explain two possible disadvantages to an economy of a fall in its agricultural output. Logical explanation which might include: • Shortage of food / famine (1) may have to import more food (1) export less food (1) worsen the current account position (1). • Price of food may rise (1) may increase poverty / might worsen health (1). • Less food production (1) unemployment may increase (1) if lack of labour mobility / structural unemployment (1). • May result in migration from rural to urban areas (1) putting pressure on resources in urban areas (1). • Economic growth / GDP will fall (1) if lower agricultural output is not offset by rise in output of secondary and tertiary sectors (1). 4 One mark each for each of two disadvantages identified and one mark each for each of two explanations. 5(c) Analyse how a central bank could avoid deflation. • Deflation is a fall in the price level (1). • The central bank could lower the rate of interest (1) reduce return from saving (1) encourage borrowing (1) encourage a rise in consumer expenditure (1) encouraging firms to raise their prices (1). • It could increase the money supply (1) increasing bank lending (1) increasing investment (1). • Expansionary monetary policy (1) increases total (aggregate) demand (1) causing prices to rise (1). 6 Question Answer Marks Guidance 5(d) Discuss whether or not a firm should have growth as its main objective. In assessing each answer, use the table opposite. Why it should: • may increase market share • may increase market power • may increase profits / keep shareholders happy • may enable the firm to take greater advantage of economies of scale • may increase pay and job security of managers / directors • may make it more difficult for another firm to take it over as will involve a greater cost Why it might not: • if demand is falling, survival may be a more appropriate main objective • if demand is limited e.g. a niche market, growth may be an unlikely objective • profit maximisation as an objective, if successful, will provide the funds for growth in the longer run • state-owned enterprise may have social welfare as an objective • growth may result in diseconomies of scale • growth may put pressure on workers which could lower productivity / result in higher labour turnover • may make it more attractive for a firm to take it over 8 Level Description Marks 3 A reasoned discussion which accurately examines both sides of the economic argument, making use of economic information and clear and logical analysis to evaluate economic issues and situations. One side of the argument may have more depth than the other, but overall both sides of the argument are considered and developed. There is thoughtful evaluation of economic concepts, terminology, information and/or data appropriate to the question. The discussion may also point out the possible uncertainties of alternative decisions and outcomes. 6–8 2 A reasoned discussion which makes use of economic information and clear analysis to evaluate economic issues and situations. The answer may lack some depth and development may be one- sided. There is relevant use of economic concepts, terminology, information and data appropriate to the question. 3–5 Question Answer Marks Guidance 5(d) Level Description Marks 1 There is a simple attempt at using economic definitions and terminology. Some reference may be made to economic theory, with occasional understanding. 1–2 0 A mark of zero should be awarded for no creditable content. 0

This question in 0987/21 May/June 2021

3 Consumers in Uruguay are eating more processed foods. Factors of production, including enterprise, have responded to this change. Firms in the processed food industry have become more capital-intensive. All of Uruguay’s industries were affected by the rise in its inflation rate, from 6.2% in 2017 to 7.7% in 2018. (a) Define enterprise. [2] (b) Explain the influence of opportunity cost on consumers’ decisions. [4] (c) Analyse why a firm may become more capital-intensive. [6] (d) Discuss whether inflation harms a country’s industries. [8]

20 marks

Mark scheme: 3(a) Define enterprise. Risk bearing (1) setting up / owning a business (1) key decision making / organisation of the other factors of production (1) profit incentive / profit is the reward (1). 2 3(b) Explain the influence of opportunity cost on consumers’ decisions. Logical explanation which might include: Opportunity cost is the (next) best alternative (1) forgone / sacrificed (1). Consumers have limited income / time (1) have to make choices (1) cannot have everything they want (1) if buy more of one product may have to buy less of another / example of what product may be given up to buy another product (1). 4 Question Answer Marks Guidance 3(c) Analyse why a firm may become more capital- intensive. Coherent analysis which might include: The cost of capital may fall / the price of labour may rise (1) lowering costs of production (1) making the firm more price-competitive (1) may increase profits (1). Advances in technology (1) may improve the quality of capital (1) making it more productive / efficient (1) may increase the quality of products produced (1) raise demand for the products produced (1). Firms may want to reduce human error / more consistent quality / uniform products (1) reduce wastage (1). Firms may want to avoid disruption to production (1) caused by industrial action / strikes / sickness (1) capital equipment does not need to take breaks / can work 24 hours a day (1). There may be a shortage of labour (1) making it difficult to recruit workers (1). A government may reduce taxes on capital goods (1) provide subsidies (1) the rate of interest may be reduced (1) making capital goods more affordable (1). The firm’s output may rise (1) reducing the average fixed cost of capital / benefiting from economies of scale (1). 6 Question Answer Marks Guidance 3(d) Discuss whether inflation harms a country’s industries. In assessing each answer, use the table opposite. Why it might: • may increase costs of production • may reduce competitiveness, lowering sales at home and abroad • may upset industrial relations, workers pressing for wage rises • may make it difficult to plan • may discourage savings which can reduce funds available for investment • corporation tax may be moved into a higher tax bracket • may be menu costs / shoe leather costs Why it might not: • may be demand-pull inflation with demand for the firm’s products increasing • may be low and stable • may enable a firm to reduce the real cost of any debt • may enable the firm to cut the real cost of wages • may be lower than other countries’ inflation rates • may not be foreign substitutes • some industries may have inelastic demand 8 Level Description Marks 3 A reasoned discussion which accurately examines both sides of the economic argument, making use of economic information and clear and logical analysis to evaluate economic issues and situations. One side of the argument may have more depth than the other, but overall both sided of the argument are considered and developed. There is thoughtful evaluation of economic concepts, terminology, information and/or data appropriate to the question. The discussion may also point out the possible uncertainties of alternative decisions and outcomes. 6–8 2 A reasoned discussion which makes use of economic information and clear analysis to evaluate economic issues and situations. The answer may lack some depth and development may be one-sided. There is relevant use of economic concepts, terminology, information and data appropriate to the question. 3–5 1 There is a simple attempt at using economic definitions and terminology. Some reference may be made to economic theory, with occasional understanding. 1–2 0 A mark of zero should be awarded for no creditable content. 0

This question in 0987/22 May/June 2021

2 A number of countries, including Morocco, capture water from fog. Water is used in the primary, secondary and tertiary sectors. In recent years, Morocco has increased the quantity and quality of its resources and has moved more of them into the tertiary sector. The quantity, quality and composition of a country’s resources are influenced by a number of factors, including its birth rate. Morocco’s birth rate fell from 19.9 in 2016 to 18.7 in 2018. (a) Define a free good. [2] (b) Explain, with examples, the difference between the secondary sector and the tertiary sector. [4] (c) Analyse, using a production possibility curve (PPC), the effect of an increase in the quality of its resources on an economy. [6] (d) Discuss whether or not a fall in a country’s birth rate will benefit an economy. [8]

20 marks

Mark scheme: 2(a) Define a free good. No opportunity cost (1) a good that takes no resources/factors of production to produce / naturally abundant in supply / does not use scarce resources (1). 2(b) Explain, with examples, the difference between the secondary sector and the tertiary sector. Logical explanation which might include: Secondary sector covers manufacturing (and construction) / converts primary products into finished goods (1) e.g. car industry (1). Tertiary sector covers services / final stage of production (1) e.g. insurance (1). 4 For tertiary sector, it is not sufficient to just have the sector which sells products as this is only part of the sector. But for the tertiary sector example accept the sale of a product e.g. the sale of jewellery. Question Answer Marks Guidance 2(c) Analyse, using a production possibility curve (PPC), the effect of an increase in the quality of its resources on an economy. Up to 4 marks for the diagram: Axes correctly labelled with different outputs (1). Initial curve drawn as a curve / line sloping downward to the axes (1). New curve drawn as a curve / line sloping downward to the axes (1). Shift indicated by arrow or letter (1). Up to 2 marks for coherent analysis which might include: Better quality resources will increase productivity (1) enable more of both types of goods to be produced (1) with a given quantity of resources (1) increase productive potential / productive capacity / total supply (1) cause economic growth (1). 6 Nothing for higher output, higher GDP as this is uncertain. Question Answer Marks Guidance 2(d) Discuss whether or not a fall in a country’s birth rate will benefit an economy. In assessing each answer, use the table opposite. Why it might: • reduce the number of dependents • fewer workers away from work to bring up children • enable resources to be used to increase economic growth / raise living standards • reduce pressure on the environment • move towards the optimum population Why it might not: • reduce the size of the labour force in the longer term • reduce labour mobility • create an ageing population • reduce size of markets 8 Level Description Marks 3 A reasoned discussion which accurately examines both sides of the economic argument, making use of economic information and clear and logical analysis to evaluate economic issues and situations. One side of the argument may have more depth than the other, but overall, both sides of the argument are considered and developed. There is thoughtful evaluation of economic concepts, terminology, information and/or data appropriate to the question. The discussion may also point out the possible uncertainties of alternative decisions and outcomes. 6–8 2 A reasoned discussion which makes use of economic information and clear analysis to evaluate economic issues and situations. The answer may lack some depth and development may be one-sided. There is relevant use of economic concepts, terminology, information and data appropriate to the question. 3–5 1 There is a simple attempt at u sing economic definitions and terminology. Some reference may be made to economic theory, with occasional understanding. 1–2 Question Answer Marks Guidance 2(d) Level Description Marks 0 A mark of zero should be awarded for no creditable content. 0

This question in 0987/22 Oct/Nov 2021

3 Two of Uzbekistan’s main industries are cotton and gas. Uzbekistan is the world’s seventh largest producer, and fifth largest exporter, of cotton. The Uzbek government has tried to influence the cotton industry’s price elasticity of supply. It has also nearly ended the use of child labour in cotton production. The country’s output of gas increased by 7% in 2018 and its average cost of gas production fell. (a) Identify two determinants of price elasticity of supply. [2] (b) Explain two advantages to an economy of ending child labour. [4] (c) Analyse how average cost can change as output increases. [6] (d) Discuss whether or not an economy would benefit from allocating more of its resources to agriculture. [8]

20 marks

Mark scheme: 3(a) Identify two determinants of price elasticity of supply. Two from: • ability to store • level of stocks • perishability • production time • level of spare capacity • cost of altering supply • time period under consideration – short/long run 2 Accept weather. 3(b) Explain two advantages to an economy of ending child labour. Logical explanation which might include: Enable children to be educated (1) raise productivity / workers’ skills / literacy rates / long run economic growth (1). Improve children’s health (1) increase life expectancy / raise living standards (1). Reduce cycle of poverty (1) children will later gain higher paid jobs (1). Raise wages (1) due to reduced supply of cheap labour (1). Remove international bans / encourage more foreign tourists (1) increase exports (1). Increase job opportunities for adults (1) lower unemployment / increase employment of adults (1). 4 One mark each for each of two advantages identified and one mark each for each of two explanations. Question Answer Marks Guidance 3(c) Analyse how average cost can change as output increases. Average cost may fall due to economies of scale (1) example of an economy of scale e.g. financial economy (1) explanation of the example (up to 2 marks) e.g. banks may charge lower interest rates (1) reducing firms’ cost of borrowing (1). Another example e.g. buying economy (1) explanation of the example (up to 2 marks) e.g. able to buy in bulk (1) and receive a discount (1). Higher output may enable fixed costs to be spread over a larger output (1) which may reduce average fixed costs (1) whether average total cost will fall will depend on what happens to average fixed cost plus average variable cost (1). Average cost may rise due to diseconomies of scale (1) example e.g. managerial economy (1) explanation of the example (up to 2 marks) e.g. difficulty of keeping control of a large organisation (1) leading to more mistakes / poor decision making (1). Another example e.g. poor labour relations (1) explanation of the example (up to 2 marks) e.g. lack of contact between workers and managers (1) may be strikes (1). 6 Nothing for reference to causes of changes in total costs e.g. employing more workers will increase wages paid. Question Answer Marks Guidance 3(d) Discuss whether or not an economy would benefit from allocating more of its resources to agriculture. In assessing each answer, use the table opposite. Why it might: • specialisation may increase efficiency, raise output, increase exports • may improve the current account of the balance of payments • imports of food may be reduced, reduced reliance on other countries for basic necessities • health and safety standards may be maintained • the industry is labour intensive in some countries and so may reduce unemployment Why it might not: • wages in the industry tend to be relatively low • the supply of agricultural products can fluctuate significantly due to changes in weather conditions • opportunity cost of fewer resources for manufacturing goods and for services • demand for manufactured goods and for services tend to rise more as income increases • agriculture uses up considerable amounts of water. 8 Level Description Marks 3 A reasoned discussion which accurately examines both sides of the economic argument, making use of economic information and clear and logical analysis to evaluate economic issues and situations. One side of the argument may have more depth than the other, but overall, both sides of the argument are considered and developed. There is thoughtful evaluation of economic concepts, terminology, information and/or data appropriate to the question. The discussion may also point out the possible uncertainties of alternative decisions and outcomes. 6–8 2 A reasoned discussion which makes use of economic information and clear analysis to evaluate economic issues and situations. The answer may lack some depth and development may be one-sided. There is relevant use of economic concepts, terminology, information and data appropriate to the question. 3–5 1 There is a simple attempt at u sing economic definitions and terminology. Some reference may be made to economic theory, with occasional understanding. 1–2 Question Answer Marks Guidance 3(d) Level Description Marks 0 A mark of zero should be awarded for no creditable content. 0

This question in 0987/22 Oct/Nov 2021

5 Singapore is a high-income country with a shortage of land and labour. Singapore is often given as an example of a market economy. The Singaporean government does, however, intervene in the economy. For example, it encourages its population to eat two servings of fruit and two servings of vegetables per day. (a) Identify the reward to labour and the reward to land. [2] (b) Explain how an increase in a worker’s income can affect their mobility of labour. [4] (c) Analyse, using a demand and supply diagram, how a greater awareness of the health benefits of eating fruit will affect the market for fruit. [6] (d) Discuss whether or not a market economic system benefits an economy. [8]

20 marks

Mark scheme: 5(a) Identify the reward to labour and the reward to land. Wages (1) rent (1). 2 Question Answer Marks Guidance 5(b) Explain how an increase in a worker’s income can affect their mobility of labour. Logical explanation which might include: An increase in income will enable a worker to spend more on their education (1) increasing occupational mobility (1). Higher income will make housing more affordable (1) increasing geographical mobility (1). Higher income will make high-tech products more affordable (1) enabling a worker to be better informed (1) increasing both occupational and geographical mobility (1). Higher incomes may discourage a worker from changing jobs / may be content with current job (1) may be satisfied with income level (1) reducing geographical and occupational mobility (1). Higher incomes make it easier to afford car / use public transport (1) increases geographical mobility (1). 4 No marks for causes of higher income. Question Answer Marks Guidance 5(c) Analyse, using a demand and supply diagram, how a greater awareness of the health benefits of eating fruit will affect the market for fruit. Coherent analysis which might include: Up to 4 marks for D & S diagram: Axes correctly labelled–price and quantity or p and q (1). Original demand and supply curves correctly labelled (1). New demand curve shifted to the right (1). Equilibriums–shown by lines P1 and Q1 and P2 and Q2 or equilibrium points E1 and E2 (1). Up to 2 marks for written analysis which might include: Greater awareness of health benefits will encourage more people to eat / demand fruit (1) Raise price / raise quantity traded (1). 6 Note Note: Axes do not have to be labelled price of fruit and quantity of fruit to get mark. No marks for stating price changes from P1 to P2 or quantity changes from Q1 to Q2. To get first mark in written analysis they must refer to fruit. Question Answer Marks Guidance 5(d) Discuss whether or not a market economic system benefits an economy. In assessing each answer, use the table opposite. Why it might:  profit incentive and competition may increase efficiency  wage differentials may encourage effort  price may be low and quality high  country’s products may be internationally competitive  economic growth may be high  consumer choice may be high  consumer sovereignty may be high Why it might not:  risk of market failure  public goods will not be provided  demerit goods are overconsumed and merit goods and under-consumed  problem of pollution and other external costs  unemployment may be high as lack of co-ordination  some countries may lack the support structures e.g., legal system to enforce property rights to allow market forces to work efficiently.  monopolies can be created 8 Level Description Marks 3 A reasoned discussion which accurately examines both sides of the economic argument, making use of economic information and clear and logical analysis to evaluate economic issues and situations. One side of the argument may have more depth than the other, but overall, both sides of the argument are considered and developed. There is thoughtful evaluation of economic concepts, terminology, information and / or data appropriate to the question. The discussion may also point out the possible uncertainties of alternative decisions and outcomes. 68 Question Answer Marks Guidance 5(d) Level Description Marks 2 A reasoned discussion which makes use of economic information and clear analysis to evaluate economic issues and situations. The answer may lack some depth and development may be one- sided. There is relevant use of economic concepts, terminology, information and data appropriate to the question. 35 1 There is a simple attempt at using economic definitions and terminology. Some reference may be made to economic theory, with occasional understanding. 12 0 A mark of zero should be awarded for no creditable content. 0

This question in 0987/21 May/June 2022

1 (a) Calculate Bhutan’s GDP in 2018. [1] (b) Identify two indicators that are in both the World Happiness Index and the Human Development Index. [2] (c) State why Bhutan’s 2018 government budget is likely to have increased total demand in Bhutan. [2] (d) Explain two reasons why someone may prefer to work in the tertiary sector rather than in the primary sector. [4] (e) Analyse how investment in capital goods and education can increase New Zealand’s productivity. [4] (f) Analyse the relationship between GDP per head and net migration. [5] (g) Discuss whether or not enterprise is likely to have increased in New Zealand after 2019. [6] (h) Discuss whether or not a cut in income tax rates will increase living standards. [6]

30 marks

Mark scheme: 1(a) Calculate Bhutan’s GDP in 2018. $2.6 bn / $2600 m / $2 600 000 000 / 2.6  10⁹ (1). 1(b) Identify two indicators that are in both the World Happiness Index and the Human Development Index. Life expectancy (1) GDP per head (1). 2 If more than two indicators are given, consider the first three. 1(c) State why Bhutan’s 2018 government budget is likely to have increased total demand in Bhutan. Government spending was greater than government revenue (1) there was a budget deficit (1) of $70 m (1) the government may have used expansionary fiscal policy (1). 2 1(d) Explain two reasons why someone may prefer to work in the tertiary sector rather than in the primary sector. Logical explanation which might include: Better working conditions / non-wage factors (1) e.g. working inside / not having to work in wet weather / less stress / more job satisfaction / fringe benefits (1). Shorter working hours (1) permitting more leisure time (1). Type of work / less physically demanding / not manual work (1) less risk to health / less tiring / less dangerous / fewer accidents / may lack physical strength (1). Better paid (1) enabling more goods and services to be purchased / higher standard of living / as may require more qualifications / skills/training / value added may greater in the tertiary sector / tertiary sector may be expanding / primary sector contracting / may be higher demand for tertiary workers (1). 4 One mark for each of two reasons identified and one mark for each explanation. Note there is a degree of ‘mix and match’ here. For example, working hours or manual work can be taken as a development of working conditions. Accept an answer that explains the disadvantages of working in the primary sector e.g. may prefer to work in the tertiary sector as working hours are longer in the primary sector. Question Answer Marks Guidance 1(e) Analyse how investment in capital goods and education can increase New Zealand’s productivity. Coherent analysis which might include: Higher investment in capital goods will enable workers to work with better equipment (1) more output per worker / worker hour (1). New capital goods may incorporate advances in technology / be of higher quality (1) result in innovation (1) can work for long hours (1). Higher investment in education can enable more children to be educated / children to be educated for longer / improve quality of education / increase knowledge (1) increase workers’ skills / qualifications (1) enable workers to use more advanced technology (1). Investment in capital goods and/or education can enable capital goods/ workers to work at a faster rate (1) be more efficient (1) make fewer mistakes / less wastage (1). 4 Up to 3 marks for analysis on investment in capital goods and up to 3 marks for investment in education. Note only credit increase efficiency once. Question Answer Marks Guidance 1(f) Analyse the relationship between GDP per head and net migration. Coherent analysis which might include: Overview Generally, the countries with higher GDP per head have net immigration / net migration / the countries with lower GDP per head tend to have net emigration / positive/direct relationship (1). Supporting evidence Up to 2 marks for two pieces of supporting evidence e.g.  New Zealand has the highest GDP per head and the highest net immigration / net migration / highest positive migration (1)  Cyprus has the second highest GDP per head and the second highest net immigration / net migration / positive migration (1)  the four countries with the highest GDP per head, all have net immigration / positive net migration (1)  the two countries with lowest GDP per head both have net emigration / negative net migration (1) Exception Exception is Kenya or Mozambique (1) Kenya has higher GDP per head but higher net emigration than Mozambique (1). Comments Higher GDP per head may encourage people to move to the country to increase their living standards / income / people who migrate into the country may be high skilled / lower GDP per head may encourage people to emigrate to increase their living standards/income (1) other influences e.g. immigration controls / size of population / wars / political instability (1). 5 There may be an implied comparison e.g. generally countries with a high GDP per head have net immigration. New Zealand has a GDP per head of approx. $55 000 and net immigration of about 40,00 whereas Kenya has a GDP per head of $2,000 and net emigration of about 50 000 (1 mark). For explanation of exception, do not accept that Kenya has ‘lower net migration’ / Mozambique has ‘higher net migration’ – a misinterpretation of the figure. Question Answer Marks Guidance 1(g) Discuss whether or not enterprise is likely to have increased in New Zealand after 2019. Award up to 4 marks for logical reasons why it might, which may include: High labour productivity / high-skilled workers (1) may keep costs down (1) and increase profits (1) which will motivate more people to be entrepreneurs (1). Higher investment / better quality capital goods (1) may increase the number of firms / result in expansion of firms (1) and the opportunities to become entrepreneurs (1). Investment in education / better quality education (1) may increase the people with the skills to become entrepreneurs / increase risk taking ability (1). Higher government spending on mental health / child poverty / pollution (1) may increase workers’ skills / increase workers’ health / increase workers’ productivity (1) higher government subsidies (1) reduce firms’ costs of production (1) higher government spending may increase total demand (1). Higher economic growth (1) may have created more opportunities / greater confidence / higher total demand (1). Net immigration may have continued (1) and some immigrants may have been entrepreneurs / may set up new firms (1) more people in the country may raise total demand (1). Cut in income tax rates (1) could increase demand (1) firms’ revenue / profits (1) create greater profit incentive (1). 6 Apply this example to all questions with the command word DISCUSS (1g, 1h, 2d, 3d, 4d and 5d) Each point may be credited only once, on either side of an argument, but separate development as to how/why the outcome may differ is rewarded. Generic example Mark Tax revenue may decrease… 1 ...because of reason e.g., incomes may be lower. 1 Tax revenue may increase because incomes may be higher i.e., reverse of a previous argument. 0 Tax revenue may increase because of a different reason i.e., not the reverse of a previous argument e.g. government spending on subsidies may stimulate the economy more than spending on education. 1 Question Answer Marks Guidance 1(g) Award up to 4 marks for logical reasons why it might not, which may include: Uncertainty / lack of confidence (1) reason e.g. there may have been a recession / negative economic growth / unclear what may happen to GDP (1) which could have resulted in the reward to enterprise declining (1) may think there is a greater risk of running / setting up a firm (1). Corporation tax may have increased / tax may have increased (1) which would reduce retained profits / amount of profit that can be kept (1). Government attempts to reduce pollution / poverty / improve mental health (1) may increase firms’ costs of production and reduce profits (1) may have an opportunity cost (1) less spending on something that could increase enterprise (1) e.g. reduction is spending on education (1). Accept tax revenue may have increased for tax may have increased for why it might not Reward recognition that tax revenue may rise without a rise in tax rates or with a fall in tax rates. Question Answer Marks Guidance 1(h) Discuss whether or not a cut in income tax rates will increase living standards. Award up to 4 marks for logical reasons why it might, which may include: Will increase disposable income (1) increase ability to buy goods and services / increase purchasing power (1) buy basic necessities / reduce absolute poverty (1) may be able to fulfil more wants / buy more luxuries (1). May increase spending (1) increase total demand (1) reduce unemployment / increase employment (1) increase output / increase economic growth (1). May increase saving (1) and so provide a safety net (1). May encourage investment (1) which may lower costs of production (1) reduce prices (1). May be able to buy more merit goods / better quality education/healthcare (1) increase health / life expectancy (1). May increase the incentive to work (1) may earn more in work than on unemployment benefits (1). May enable people to work fewer hours (1) enjoy more leisure time (1). 6 Rise in income is not sufficient – need idea of disposable income. Question Answer Marks Guidance 1(h) Award up to 4 marks for logical reasons why it might not, which may include: Tax revenue may fall (1) may result in a cut in government spending (1) on e.g. education / health care / mental healthcare / child poverty / pollution / unemployment benefit (1) poor may be most reliant on public services (1). It may increase congestion as people buy more cars (1) may lead to pollution (1). It may increase depletion of non-renewable resources as consumption increases (1). It may benefit mostly the rich / poor may not benefit / will not benefit the unemployed (1) and so not everyone may enjoy higher living standards (1). People may spend on demerit goods (1) higher spending which could reduce health / life expectancy (1). Higher spending / demand may increase prices / cause inflation (1) leave purchasing power unchanged / reduce purchasing power (1).

This question in 0987/22 May/June 2022

3 Canada’s private sector firms have a number of different objectives. The quantity and quality of land used by these firms, including farms, has increased. There has also been increased investment with the firms buying more capital goods. In 2021, the Canadian government encouraged higher investment and aimed to prevent a rise in unemployment. (a) Identify two objectives of private sector firms. [2] (b) Explain one reason why the quantity of land may increase and one reason why the quality of land may increase. [4] (c) Analyse how an increase in investment may affect unemployment. [6] (d) Discuss whether or not a government should try to prevent a rise in unemployment. [8]

20 marks

Mark scheme: 3(a) Identify two objectives of private sector firms. Two from:  profit (maximisation)  growth / high sales  greater market share / market dominance  survival  improving the environment 2 Reward but do not expect profit satisficing, revenue maximisation, sales maximisation. Allow social welfare. If more than two objectives given, consider the first three. 3(b) Explain one reason why the quantity of land may increase and one reason why the quality of land may increase. Logical explanation which might include: Quantity of land Reclamation (1) creating land from the sea (1). Reduction in overfishing / hunting (1) restoring stocks of fish / wildlife (1). Reduction in flooding (1) avoiding soil erosion (1). Discovery of new natural resources (1) e.g. of oil (1). Quality of land Use of fertilisers (1) raising productivity / efficiency / fertility of land (1). Reduction in pollution (1) preventing damage / diseases (1). Good weather (1) raising productivity efficiency / fertility of land (1). Better equipment / more advanced technology (1) raising productivity efficiency / fertility of land (1). 4 One mark for identifying one reason why the quantity of land may increase and one mark for explaining that reason. One mark for identifying one reason why the quality of land may increase and one mark for explaining that reason. Question Answer Marks Guidance 3(c) Analyse how an increase in investment may affect unemployment. Coherent analysis which might include: Spending on capital goods (1) will increase total demand (1) firms may expand their output / new firms may set up / economic growth may occur (1) (may need more workers) to work with the capital equipment / demand for labour may increase / need more workers / increase job opportunities (1) this can reduce cyclical (1) unemployment (1). Investment in education / training/ healthcare / research and development (1) can raise productivity / skills (1) increase mobility (1) reduce structural unemployment (1). Investment in infrastructure (1) increase geographical mobility (1) reduce structural unemployment (1). It could cause unemployment (1) as capital goods may replace workers / production may become more capital- intensive / demand for workers may decrease (1) capital goods can be a substitute for labour (1) cause technological unemployment (1). 6 Credit fall in unemployment / rise in unemployment only once (1). Reference to cyclical / structural / technological (unemployment) can be given an additional mark in each case if linked to a relevant point. Question Answer Marks Guidance 3(d) Discuss whether or not a government should try to prevent a rise in unemployment. In assessing each answer, use the table opposite. Why it should:  may increase output / economic growth  increase tax revenue  reduce spending on unemployment benefit  reduce living standards / poverty Why it should not:  unemployment may be low  reduction in unemployment may cause inflation  the resulting higher incomes may cause a current account deficit  unemployment can create flexibility  opportunity cost of government policy measures  a government may have other objectives. 8 Level Description Marks 3 A reasoned discussion which accurately examines both sides of the economic argument, making use of economic information and clear and logical analysis to evaluate economic issues and situations. One side of the argument may have more depth than the other, but overall, both sides of the argument are considered and developed. There is thoughtful evaluation of economic concepts, terminology, information and/or data appropriate to the question. The discussion may also point out the possible uncertainties of alternative decisions and outcomes. 6–8 2 A reasoned discussion which makes use of economic information and clear analysis to evaluate economic issues and situations. The answer may lack some depth and development may be one-sided. There is relevant use of economic concepts, terminology, information and data appropriate to the question. 3–5 1 There is a simple attempt at using economic definitions and terminology. Some reference may be made to economic theory, with occasional understanding. 1–2 0 A mark of zero should be awarded for no creditable content. 0

This question in 0987/22 May/June 2023

2 Botswana uses both capital goods and labour in its diamond mining industry. The country had an average economic growth rate of 3.8% between 2015 and 2019 compared to a global average of 2.8%. Over this period, the country experienced a low inflation rate and a move away from protectionism and towards free international trade. (a) Define, with an example, a capital good. [2] (b) Explain two reasons why a low inflation rate may increase a country’s economic growth rate. [4] (c) Analyse how a government could reduce protectionism and move towards free international trade. [6] (d) Discuss whether or not a country will benefit from diamond mining. [8]

20 marks

Mark scheme: 2(a) Define, with an example, a capital good. 2 If more than two examples are given, consider the first two. A good used to produce another good or service / a human- made good used for production (1) e.g. a machine (1). 2(b) Explain two reasons why a low inflation rate may 4 One mark each for each of two reasons identified and one increase a country’s economic growth rate. mark each for each of two explanations. Logical explanation which might include: • make the country’s products internationally competitive (1) sell more exports / buy fewer imports (1) • create greater certainty (1) encourage investment / attract MNCs (1) • keep increase in costs low (1) may reduce claims for higher wages/ higher profits (1) • increase confidence (1) may increase demand / increase profits 1). 2(c) Analyse how a government could reduce protectionism 6 Allow deregulation as an alternative to remove quotas or and move towards free international trade. embargoes. Coherent analysis which might include: Reward removing / reducing bureaucracy, voluntary export restraints. • remove tariffs (1) reduce price of imports (1) if firms have lower costs of production, they will be able to Reward but do not expect reference to exchange control. compete (1) • remove quotas / increase quota (limit) (1) remove bans / embargoes (1) increase quantity of imports / reduce limits on imports (1) • remove subsidies (1) firms’ products will not be artificially cheap (1) • other countries may remove their protectionism (1) enabling exports to be sold without restrictions (1). 2(d) Discuss whether or not a country will benefit from 8 Reward but do not expect reference to social welfare will be diamond mining. increased if social benefit exceeds social cost. In assessing each answer, use the table opposite. Leve Description Mark l s Why it might: • high global demand 3 A reasoned discussion which 6–8 • can improve the current account of the balance of accurately examines both sides of payments the economic argument, making • create employment, both skilled and unskilled jobs use of economic information and • increase output / economic growth clear and logical analysis to • may increase tax revenue. evaluate economic issues and situations. One side of the Why it might not: argument may have more depth • demand will fall in a recession than the other, but overall, both • price may fluctuate sides of the argument are • may be competition considered and developed. There • can be accidents is thoughtful evaluation of • can create external costs e.g. pollution economic concepts, terminology, • if mined by an MNC, profit may be sent to the home information and/or data appropriate country to the question. The discussion • supply may be depleted may also point out the possible uncertainties of alternative • price may increase in the future so better to conserve decisions and outcomes. diamonds now • may not be a large proportion of GDP. 2 A reasoned discussion which 3–5 makes use of economic information and clear analysis to evaluate economic issues and situations. The answer may lack some depth and development may be one- sided. There is relevant use of economic concepts, terminology, information and data appropriate to the question. 2(d) 1 There is a simple attempt at using 1–2 economic definitions and terminology. Some reference may be made to economic theory, with occasional understanding. 0 A mark of zero should be awarded 0 for no creditable content.

This question in 0987/22 Oct/Nov 2023

1 (a) Calculate the price elasticity of demand for coffee. [1] (b) Identify two rewards to factors of production in Nicaragua. [2] (c) Explain one way in which unemployment is measured. [2] (d) Explain two functions of money in Nicaragua. [4] (e) Analyse the relationship between the percentage of the labour force employed in agriculture and GDP per head. [4] (f) Analyse, using a demand and supply diagram, how a drought could affect the market for coffee. [5] (g) Discuss whether or not small firms benefit Nicaraguan consumers. [6] (h) Discuss whether or not Nicaragua should devote more of its resources to coffee production. [6]

30 marks

Mark scheme: 1(a) Calculate the price elasticity of demand for coffee. () 0.3 (1) 1(b) Identify two rewards to factors of production in Nicaragua. Wages (1) profits (1) 2 Only accept these answers if within the first three listed. 1(c) Explain one way in which unemployment is measured. Claimant count (1) based on workers claiming unemployment benefits (1). OR Labour force survey (1) asking people if they are out of work and looking for employment (1). 2 One mark for a way identified and one mark for an explanation. 1(d) Explain two functions of money in Nicaragua. Medium of exchange (1) used to buy and sell products / used to trade (1). Store of value (1) used to save / keeps its value over a period of time (1). 4 One mark each for each of two functions identified and one mark for each of two explanations. Only accept these answers if within the first three listed. Question Answer Mark Guidance 1(e) Analyse the relationship between the percentage of the labour force employed in agriculture and GDP per head. Coherent analysis which might include: Relationship: Inverse or negative relationship / move in opposite directions (1). Countries with a high percentage of their labour force employed in agriculture tend to have a low GDP per head (1). Supporting evidence: The four countries with the lowest % of the labour force employed in agriculture had the highest GDP per head (1). Specific reference to one or more countries e.g. Bahamas had the lowest % employed in agriculture and the highest GDP per head (1). Use of GDP per head data to show comparison between country with high employment in agriculture and one with low percentage employment in agriculture (1). Analysis of expected relationship: Wages may be low in agriculture (1) wages / value added tends to be higher in the secondary and / or tertiary sector (1). Exception: Nicaragua / Dominica (1) Nicaragua has the second highest % of labour force employed in agriculture but the lowest GDP per head / Dominica had the highest % of labour force employed in agriculture but the second to lowest GDP (1). Analysis of exception: Explanation of another influence on GDP per head (1). 4 Responses do not have to be in the format suggested but they should address the expected/normal relationship, offer supporting evidence of that, highlight any exceptions to that, and analyse the overall data. Note the four are: Bahamas Barbados Costa Rica Saint Lucia Question Answer Mark Guidance 1(f) Analyse, using a demand and supply diagram, how a drought could affect the market for coffee. Coherent analysis which might include: D&S diagram: Axes correctly labelled – price and quantity or p and q (1). Original demand and supply curves correctly labelled (1). New supply curve shifted to the left (1). Equilibriums – shown by lines P1 and Q1 and P2 and Q2 or equilibrium points marked as E1 and E2 (1). Written analysis: A drought will lead to a shortage / will increase costs of production (1). OR The lower supply will push up price / reduce quantity (traded) (1). 5 Question Answer Mark Guidance 1(g) Discuss whether or not small firms benefit Nicaraguan consumers. Award up to 4 marks for logical reasons why they might, which may include:  know customers’ requirements (1) provide a personal service / see them often (1) may be flexible (1)  may be many small firms / competitive markets (1) prices may be low (1) quality may be high (1) may offer wider choice collectively than a few large firms (1)  may provide products for which there is only a low demand (1) niche market (1)  makes goods more accessible in rural areas (1). Award up to 4 marks for logical reasons why it might not, which may include:  may not be able to take advantage of economies of scale (1) examples (1) higher average cost of production (1) higher price (1)  small firms may have lower profits (1) may limit investment / funds available (1) fail to raise quality (1)  may limit choice (1) individual small firms may have a limited range of products (1) cannot provide all that consumers may want (1). 6 Apply this example to all questions with the command word DISCUSS  1(g), 1(h), 2(d), 3(d), 4(d) and 5(d) Each point may be credited only once, on either side of an argument, but separate development as to how/why the outcome may differ is rewarded. Generic example Mark Tax revenue may decrease… 1 ...because of reason e.g. incomes may be lower. 1 Tax revenue may increase because incomes may be higher i.e. reverse of a previous argument. 0 Tax revenue may increase because of a different reason i.e. not the reverse of a previous argument e.g. government spending on subsidies may stimulate the economy more than spending on education. 1 Only reward reference to quality or prices once. 1(h) Discuss whether or not Nicaragua should devote more of its resources to coffee production. Award up to 4 marks for logical reasons why it should, which may include:  global demand for coffee is increasing (1) demand for coffee is price inelastic (1) revenue / profits may increase (1) more tax revenue for government (1)  firms grow in size (1) greater specialisation / economies of scale may reduce average costs (1) raise quality (1) increase profits (1) more competitive (1)  exports may increase (1) improve the current account of its balance of payments (1) lead to economic growth/higher standard of living (1)  may lead to more job opportunities (1) less poverty / less government payments to unemployed (1)  already twelfth biggest world producer (1) growth will give them more monopoly power (1) more power to raise price of coffee (1). Award up to 4 marks for logical reasons why it should not, which may include:  other countries produce coffee (1) these may be more competitive (1)  output may be affected by changes in weather (1) natural disasters (1) overproduction can exhaust land (1) leading to lower yields in future (1)  opportunity cost (1) resources could be used to produce other products (1) example (1) coffee workers only receive low pay (1)  world market for coffee may fall / demand is unpredictable (1) resulting in surplus capacity / wasted resources (1)  become more dependent on other countries for imports of other (agricultural) products (1)  firms may suffer from diseconomies of scale (1) reduce profits (1). 6 Do not expect, but reward reference to absolute or comparative advantage.

This question in 0987/21 May/June 2024

5 The Peruvian government is under pressure from its industries to improve the country’s transport system. Peru’s third largest industry is tourism. There are many firms in the Peruvian tourism industry. Another major industry in Peru is fruit farming. In recent years, trade union membership in the Peruvian fruit-farming industry has increased. (a) Identify two examples of labour employed in the tourism industry. [2] (b) Explain two reasons why countries with a good transport system often have a high GDP. [4] (c) Analyse the benefits consumers may gain from a competitive market. [6] (d) Discuss whether or not an increase in trade union membership will benefit an economy. [8]

20 marks

Mark scheme: 5(a) Identify two examples of labour employed in the tourism 2 Also accept skilled and unskilled. industry. Do not accept driver or car driver on their own. Could accept Two from e.g. e.g. a driver who transports tourists, • tour guides • hotel manager / hotel worker • travel agent • flight attendant • coach / bus driver 5(b) Explain two reasons why countries with a good 4 One mark each for each of two reasons identified and one transport system often have a high GDP. mark for each of two explanations. Logical explanation which might include: Accept: increase accessibility. Lower firms’ costs of production (1) cheaper to move goods/imports/exports / move goods/raw materials//imports/exports more efficiently / increase international competitiveness and so increase exports / higher income / increase size of markets / higher total demand (1). Reduce wastage (1) food etc more likely to arrive fresh and so increase earnings for sale of e.g food / higher profits (1). Increase labour mobility / easier to get to work (1) reduce unemployment / increase productivity (1). Less congestion (1) less stress / less time lost (1). Increase (earnings from) tourism (1) cheaper / easier to move around the country (1). Attract MNCs/FDI / increase investment (1) increase employment (1) increase productive capacity (1). Fewer accidents (1) avoid loss of workers / avoid loss of working hours (1). Less pollution (1) healthier labour force (1). 5(c) Analyse the benefits consumers may gain from a 6 competitive market. Coherent analysis which might include: A competitive market has a large number of firms producing the product / no barriers to entry (1) substitutes available (1). Low prices (1) as firms try to gain a larger share of the market / attract consumers / increase purchasing power (1). High quality (1) as competition can increase efficiency (1) increase innovation (1). Choice (1) different versions of the product may be produced / greater range of products / greater variety (1). Responsive to changes in consumer demand (1) consumer sovereignty (1). 5(d) Discuss whether or not an increase in trade union Maximum of L2 4 marks if candidate answers in reverse membership will benefit an economy. based on a misinterpretation – an increase in trade union fees. In assessing each answer, use the table opposite. Level Description Marks Why it might: • rise in wages and improved working conditions may 3 A reasoned discussion which 6–8 increase productivity accurately examines both sides of the • higher wages may increase total demand which may economic argument, making use of increase real GDP economic information and clear and • improved working conditions would increase living logical analysis to evaluate economic standards issues and situations. One side of the • by providing a channel of communication, it may reduce argument may have more depth than conflicts between workers and employers the other, but overall both sided of the • by helping with training may raise output. argument are considered and developed. There is thoughtful evaluation of economic concepts, Why it might not: terminology, information and/or data • higher wages may increase inflation appropriate to the question. The • may take industrial action e.g. strikes which could lower discussion may also point out the output / GDP possible uncertainties of alternative • may resist job losses / introduction of new technology decisions and outcomes. which may prevent increases in efficiency. 2 A reasoned discussion which makes 3–5 use of economic information and clear analysis to evaluate economic issues and situations. The answer may lack some depth and development may be one-sided. There is relevant use of economic concepts, terminology, information and data appropriate to the question. 5(d) Level Description Marks 1 There is a simple attempt at using 1–2 economic definitions and terminology. Some reference may be made to economic theory, with occasional understanding. 0 A mark of zero should be awarded for 0 no creditable content.

This question in 0987/22 Oct/Nov 2024

3 In recent years, the quantity of Latvia’s factors of production has changed. Since 2008, its capital has increased and its land has not changed significantly, but its labour force and its enterprise have decreased. Enterprise and conditions of supply can affect firms’ prices. In 2022, the Latvian Government increased the country’s national minimum wage (NMW). Its NMW did, however, remain one of the lowest in the European Union. (a) Identify the rewards to capital and land. [2] (b) Explain two causes of a decrease in enterprise in an economy. [4] (c) Analyse how changes in conditions of supply can affect a firm’s prices. [6] (d) Discuss whether or not a rise in a national minimum wage will harm an economy. [8]

20 marks

Mark scheme: 3(a) Identify the rewards to capital and land. 2 If just names the two rewards, they can be in any order. • Interest (1) • rent (1) 3(b) Explain two causes of a decrease in enterprise in an 4 One mark each for each of two causes identified and one economy. mark each for each of two explanations. Logical explanation which might include: If more than two causes given, consider the first three. • Decrease in profit / increase in corporate income MAX of two marks if not identifying what changes. (corporation) tax (1) increase in interest rates for borrowing (1) reduce financial incentive to become an entrepreneur (1). • Reduction in education (1) reduce those with the skills to become entrepreneurs (1). • Reduction in immigration / reduction in population (1) reduce the number of people who can become entrepreneurs (1). • Entrepreneurs move abroad (1) better prospects / less tax (1). • Reduction in the retirement age (1) reduces supply of potential entrepreneurs (1). • Recession / war (1) firms may go out of business / reduces willingness to take risks / reduces confidence / certainty (1). • Increased government regulation (1) excessive rules may discourage entrepreneurs (1). • Nationalisation of an industry / growth of monopolies (1) removal of entrepreneurs (1). 3(c) Analyse how changes in conditions of supply can affect 6 Only allow one mark for reference to a rise in price and one a firm’s prices. mark for reference to a fall in price. Coherent analysis which might include: MAX 4 marks if not identifying change in conditions of supply. • Increase in costs of production (1) due to rise in wages / raw material costs / capital goods costs / tariffs (1) raise price (1) to maintain profit (1). • Natural disasters (1) can create a shortage (1) raise price (1). • Changes in weather (1) good weather can create a surplus in supply e.g. agriculture (1) prices fall (1) or poor weather can create a shortage (1) prices rise (1) • Increase in indirect tax / corporate income (corporation) tax (1) a firm may pass this onto consumers as higher prices (1) especially if demand is inelastic (1). • Government subsidies to firms (1) reduce the cost of production (1) the firm may be able to gain the same revenue and profit (1) with a lower price (1). • Discovery of new source of raw materials (1) enabling the firm to supply (1) more at a lower price (1). • Advances in technology (1) example (1) could lower costs of production (1) reducing price (1). • Improvements in education and training (1) raise productivity (1) lower prices (1). 3(d) Discuss whether or not a rise in a national minimum 8 Accurate diagram can achieve Level 1. wage will harm an economy. Level Description Marks In assessing each answer, use the table opposite. 3 A reasoned discussion which accurately 6–8 Why it might: examines both sides of the economic • increase unemployment if firms cannot afford to pay argument, making use of economic higher wages information and clear and logical • higher unemployment would reduce total demand analysis to evaluate economic issues • lower total demand would reduce output and situations. One side of the • tax revenue may fall, and expenditure on state benefits argument may have more depth than may rise the other, but overall both sides of the • if higher wages are paid, there may be inflation. argument are considered and developed. There is thoughtful Why it might not: evaluation of economic concepts, • reduce poverty as raise the income of the low-paid terminology, information and/or data • encourage more people to enter the labour force appropriate to the question. The • increase productivity as workers may be more discussion may also point out the motivated possible uncertainties of alternative • encourage firms to train workers to gain better return decisions and outcomes. • may be set below the existing equilibrium wage level. 2 A reasoned discussion which makes 3–5 use of economic information and clear analysis to evaluate economic issues and situations. The answer may lack some depth and development may be one-sided. There is relevant use of economic concepts, terminology, information and data appropriate to the question. 3(d) 8 Level Description Marks 1 There is a simple attempt at using 1–2 economic definitions and terminology. Some reference may be made to economic theory, with occasional understanding. 0 A mark of zero should be awarded for 0 no creditable content.

This question in 0987/21 May/June 2025

1 (a) Calculate St. Kitts and Nevis’s government budget deficit in 2022. [1] (b) Identify two examples of the factor of production ‘land’ in St. Kitts and Nevis. [2] (c) Explain how tourism causes external costs in St. Kitts and Nevis. [2] (d) Explain two reasons why a foreign bank may open a branch in St. Kitts and Nevis. [4] (e) Draw a demand and supply diagram to show the effect of an increase in the productivity of onion farmers on the market for onions. [4] (f) Analyse the relationship between healthcare spending as a percentage of GDP and life expectancy. [5] (g) Discuss whether or not an increase in the size of its fishing industry would benefit St. Kitts and Nevis. [6] (h) Discuss whether or not deflation is likely to have harmed St. Kitts and Nevis. [6]

30 marks

Mark scheme: Question Answer Mark Guidance 1(a) Calculate St. Kitts and Nevis’s Government budget 1 Accept 18m. deficit in 2022. ($)18 000 000 / – ($)18 000 000. $18 m / – $18 m (1). 1(b) Identify two examples of the factor of production land in 2 If more than two examples given, consider the first three. St. Kitts and Nevis. Two from: beaches (1), (coral) reefs (1), marine life / fish (1) rainforests (1) and soil (1). 1(c) Explain how tourism causes external costs in St. Kitts 2 One mark for explanation of external costs. and Nevis. One mark for example based on tourism. • Social costs are greater than private costs / social costs include private costs and external costs / harmful effects on third parties / those not directly involved in producing or consuming the product (1). • Example of an external cost caused by tourism in St Kitts and Nevis e.g. pollution / environmental damage / death of wildlife / death of marine life / overcrowding (1). 1(d) Explain two reasons why a foreign bank may open a 4 One mark each for each of two reasons identified and one branch in St. Kitts and Nevis. mark each for each of two explanations. Logical explanation which might include: If more than two reasons given, consider the first three. • High incomes in the country (1) high demand for Most of the explanation points e.g. high profit could be banking services / high demand for loans / may save linked to any of the three identification points except high more / borrowers likely to be able to repay loans / high disposable income should be linked to absence of personal profit / high revenue (1). income tax. • Absence (low) of personal income tax (1) workers would be able to keep all of their income / more disposable Do not give two explanation marks for one identification. income / firms may be able to pay lower wages / increase workers’ motivation (1). Explanation marks here are dependent on the • Relatively high literacy rates (1) awareness of benefits identifications. of having a bank account / saving / skilled workers / high productivity (1). 1(e) Draw a demand and supply diagram to show the effect 4 of an increase in the productivity of onion farmers on the market for onions. D&S diagram: Axes correctly labelled – price and quantity or p and q (1). Original demand and supply curves correctly labelled (1). New supply curve shifted to the right (1). Equilibriums – shown by lines P1 and Q1 and P2 and Q2 or equilibrium points marked as E1 and E2 (1). 1(f) Analyse the relationship between healthcare spending 5 Responses do not have to be in the format suggested but as a percentage of GDP and life expectancy. they should address the expected/normal relationship, offer supporting evidence of that, highlight any exceptions to that, Expected relationship: and analyse the overall data. Direct / positive relationship (1). Generally, the higher healthcare spending, the higher the life expectancy (1). Supporting evidence should involve interpretation, not just description. Supporting evidence: E.g.: Haiti has the second lowest % healthcare spending and the shortest life expectancy (1) Canada spends a higher % on healthcare than Egypt and has a longer life expectancy / Canada spends the highest percentage on health care and has the second highest longest life expectancy / Canada and Sweden spend a high % on healthcare and have long life expectancy (1). Analysis of the supporting information: Higher spending on healthcare would be expected to raise the health of the population / provide better quality healthcare (1) increase awareness of need for healthy living / provide more check-ups / preventative medical care / reduce the death rate (1). Exception: Monaco (1) spends the lowest % on healthcare but has the longest life expectancy (1). Analysis of exception: 1.9% of a very high GDP can mean higher spending than e.g. 12.9% of a lower GDP / Monaco may have a high GDP (1). There are other influences on life expectancy e.g. nutrition / education/housing/war (1). 1(g) Discuss whether or not an increase in the size of its 6 Award one mark in total for higher / lower average costs, fishing industry would benefit St. Kitts and Nevis. one mark for lower / higher fish prices, one mark for higher / lower profits (1). Award up to 4 marks for logical reasons why it might, which may include: Higher / lower profits should be linked to the fishing industry. • may reduce imports of fish (1) reduce risk of supply-side shocks / imports being cut off (1) enable fish to be Apply this example to all questions with the command exported (1) may improve the current account word DISCUSS balance / improve the balance of payments (1) (1(g), 1(h), 2(d), 3(d), 4(d) and 5(d)) • may increase employment / increase job opportunities / reduce unemployment (1) raise incomes Each point may be credited only once, on either side of an (1) increase living standards (1) increase argument, but separate development as to how/why the GDP / increase output / cause economic growth (1) outcome may differ is rewarded. higher tax revenue (1) • may enable greater advantage to be taken of Generic example Mark economies of scale (1) example (1) lower average cost (1) lower fish prices (1) Tax revenue may decrease … 1 • (larger boats) may be more efficient / more productive (1) make the industry more profitable / increase profits ... because of reason e.g. incomes may be 1 from fishing (1). lower. Tax revenue may increase because incomes 0 may be higher i.e. reverse of a previous argument. Tax revenue may increase because of a different 1 reason i.e. not the reverse of a previous argument e.g. government spending on subsidies may stimulate the economy more than spending on education. 1(g) Award up to 4 marks for logical reasons why it might not, which may include: • opportunity cost (1) could use resources in other industries / government can spend more on e.g. education / increase budget deficit (1) • over-fishing (1) deplete fish stocks / lose marine life / deplete resources (1) raise fish prices in the long run (1) • may experience diseconomies of scale (1) example (1) higher average cost (1) reduce profit (1) • may cause external costs / environmental harm (1) may damage coral reefs / cause pollution (1) harm tourism (1) • may be a dangerous occupation (1) may be low-paid (1) low-skilled (1) may experience seasonal unemployment (1) • risk of over specialisation / too great a dependency on the industry (1) may be harmed by a fall in demand for fish / rise in competition from other countries (1). 1(h) Discuss whether or not deflation is likely to have 6 Award one mark for malign (bad) deflation is harmful harmed St. Kitts and Nevis. whereas benign (good) deflation is beneficial. Award up to 4 marks for logical reasons why it might, which Mark for higher employment and mark for higher GDP can may include: only be awarded if come from higher total supply. • may have increased real value of debt (1) may default (1) may have decreased investment (1) ‘save more’ may be credited on either side but only once. • may have resulted in a deflationary spiral (1) may have resulted from lower total demand (1) lower GDP / lower output / reduce economic growth / may cause a recession (1) lower employment / increased unemployment (1) lowered wages / income (1) • may reduce confidence (1) may discourage MNCs (1) • may reduce consumer expenditure / save more / create uncertainty (1) delay buying goods and services (until price is lower) (1). Award up to 4 marks for logical reasons why it might not, which may include: • may have increased purchasing power / real income / with the same income more goods and services can be purchased (1) (some) people may spend / consume more (1) • value of saving may have increased (1) increasing wealth (1) • may be the result of higher total supply (1) due to advances in technology / lower costs of production (1) higher output / economic growth (1) higher employment (1) • may have increased international competitiveness of its products / lower export prices (1) increased exports / export revenue (1) reduced imports / import expenditure (1) improve current account balance (1).

This question in 0987/22 May/June 2025