Cambridge IGCSE Thai - First Language 0518 — 2014 May/June Paper 2 · Variant 1

This document consists of 6 printed pages and 2 blank pages. DC (SJF/SLM) 83503/3 © UCLES 2014 [Turn over Cambridge International Examinations Cambridge International General Certificate of Secondary Education * 4 0 7 6 8 0 9 9 1 2 * FIRST LANGUAGE THAI 0518/02 Paper 2 Reading and Directed Writing May/June 2014 2 hours 15 minutes Additional Materials: Answer Booklet/Paper READ THESE INSTRUCTIONS FIRST If you have been given an Answer Booklet, follow the instructions on the front cover of the Booklet. Write your Centre number, candidate number and name on all the work you hand in. Write in dark blue or black pen. Do not use staples, paper clips, glue or correction fluid. DO NOT WRITE IN ANY BARCODES. Answer all questions. Dictionaries are not permitted. At the end of the examination, fasten all your work securely together. The number of marks is given in brackets [ ] at the end of each question or part question. PAPA CAMBRIDGE

» a AVAAAUAAUN 1 a UNAIINN 1 vie a : Cae “LaninsaununnasweduniuN” oodus@fantoansuedusn “wand beumunhasivau mul" ves wha Masad Undeuaogempiod airnreia asstunssuadwassAeianuteuvsardens ae) sedi 2554 fn WionnesatelAsumendratinnuce vetualunduas nan aeuMunaularhevinindeufuriownerin wasides AyomFanslmamnenainaunessutesdudnd quia fnasiag walnnwas anne ashi Findletut 21 waranty 2518 a aqrgind Anwniinendes AaulinnnssauasAsassners ufhvdoaaeugu cfhinusiewas Yoanandutlars wien fudenumivte ulaGesdumesstes ‘auouniladumersenge Hednwrafteniteunasuaes auruvastinideuiwdennadlaniulannw aang aufauant #maudteutadastl 2542-2543 aalunn wiwwuaany ewgl euuuunasnuaesiathuehenanitite anurlds ndenunareabifieunan siniuAdeuniqu wae Taniumsdaunriqu tavuéduanindauniiqu waniuvau wires Adeumigquisuasuonne deuudafvellbithua andy udeaintiutaieumisaa nailuuriumelasiaiiios qanieumiqu ausautuyinuasis fos dsGossrananiued Juayrtufin Hin deustey Gutudleiinseuownayia Sua wersilewaeswaasaansiin Hlueeinsausn Goadtufludy 7) 2551 Wainaillaznan THAILAND INDY Pe nr ne a ae AWARD 2008 Tiiaavinwinuiasduan lal nguidavaadasay Gord npnuntauiles AlAswia fiGesdu 4 Gestsaued {ua “unadifeutiundrastaunrun” dae doviuratesds unnvin save ludasem annus nasunie4 Fusuna Tear Gosiiiva ei uastimanrsiara du nnadiagia 41 “1991 Aslavanaannmagula idu aay Renviuse’ Seneenainiadrdiutosuuumts diaaduitar o1n viatare nuiesiednarnuils aidesdtuve fueniihs amiusiy Sreuerubiaettiuenaderld wimutlavien a drunaaisladmiaAunarnaneessts otnlseiuinin aueludoadull leet Heimaguusamelé ou anf naviamavin amaMenrarninarsuacnsiuzed ood, ~ s, Pan ett gnu laigesdanrsiuusetutlymriiaivels mares rlaguuda wWapdietlyuAaesls usisudravwpanvtaannsanlavasaw punta ASunansenuarnienasal “Undenusiazaumuanrsuntyyret rani usieiaae paraganitebbiauganas und quersuninaaganeoazes nausuorssduunuldinioumiursGeoyadiangnasaidny 7 ihuwansenuainasasulanadsl 2 nsstrmmatthsasanne HenihaeMaluawweuvsels lar wasagw sxudobeits wel wsichrementossraain7 Aiwansenufislug)” Tudanssaniaiuthanihinaucludasdunaraites tndluutuldierd claauedanusraaa1d ulSniieaestia rum unliifinddludiasuacuuiin dhudansassunrsfiunurl Anuszunnnile aastuMusinuavarsued yotwtarwtardiuas dfanarnuseuannaudin, uongur taftunruntauiiens ihe nanaania ueduntasnisiunuderain vdumbetenat arduudaadraineraniagnés 30 Rnseadinttuitiununl Anvivdle onudrazdiadehunruladrailarnqaaniteada to nacifioulalaifianaqy Waduaniuthideutuliund aeahiuniudl 07 sours tinea lsctevounruqnniatirericyidumivae daily TANG uArATY Wuartnvagaanrsasscunsen Wiadriwietau soulineareurenen Anwfveumiste oaviumistar wad wdundw waaazvarieudiwentedugneuuiae wlio sousandaushahidinGeulacon Geulezoafidaumisfeuan nan santos) dutinusrusteds viumaluviasayastniiae uiflau vasinnrsd naan syarquunarin ituiltslaitlsaGosdueena aalal need deat Hoste UsaebiGestetabat Gos dufstaden uihrdadtenfeneieatugeunarediyars bs seus antesdudesqartreuancin thats nuduen dour ution sguduarqaingun warelanvaaniguldt mavieguastiutiaees whuneain Alia aov-liaay alas deren ary 50 Teenduaieunrigu dnaiandasina Falacines” aia tindawalseie 36 U navaiieine Goulaanarn Waynuessndes wha hasioy' Fleiaulun” www.ryt9.com © UCLES 2014 0518/02/M/J/14

3 0518/02/M/J/14 © UCLES 2014 [Turn over

4 ° s AAUMI IMAM wine a daaaunaun 1 » do 1 + 2 . Py ‘VrinGeuaqllansneinunaniaasundi maa lneliianiaraunqaly 3 useiiu Aa © qaldure teu inaalzas “una Feunundacaunun” UssauArNa Use © uniuealavaqnuaae rasiag © ATINAAIUIEIANUAT MAsAg Hilla wAEUIEIAULOS vaneiwa va, x kode tt e lifeyadinunaruiaaunid aetis eal ad © thuFenuiewar . Be t © thuaaaunsnaruamatureniteuas lwo Mil ves a Pa ee er) i ae © ideeAritedqwownpiaoaliniiqaurhinasainls aurea inunAra donhanGeuGeatudanareninGenuos vt ow s. lg. © Gesdoeuussmumaniiuanags ‘ ‘ : PP ae © apuissannuanet fe vii laelaiduussia tuegtuawina rede [20] ta2 P Pare Cote cles great ae a ans Mamnmulaieuladanudlainiide “dundedull aurianaluiuntiy a oe er =. te WMadadtnihinGauinnisd ude anyadueuininGauillenra iduniwal ANUUAG Hrasiad WiNaululoa ites © lifeyadinunarwriaaaun Py an Sct ay «x zs © Geuundunowal (lidunacin) ssudrninieuddunwal tuned masag ght duno ot at on Mi © Geudeundunrwaldounmasctaes » © RAIMAUALA HOU ele voNmARIN , . a Aare © Geulildaruenaioeliduussia Ussaiuyimd tuerriuaiaa ede [20] © UCLES 2014 0518/02/M/J/14

5 0518/02/M/J/14 © UCLES 2014 [Turn over

6 0518/02/M/J/14 © UCLES 2014 o°­°˜°œš¸É o°Á ¸¥œš‡ªµ¤Á·ªœª´¥¦»nœÄ®o®´œ¤µ­œÄ‹«·¨ž³v®œ´Š˜³¨»Šw×¥œÎµÂœª‡ªµ¤‡·—  °Š°´¤–¸­ºÂ­Š¤µÁžÈœ˜´ª°¥nµŠš¸É—¸Äœ„µ¦œÎµÁ­œ°š‡ªµ¤Á¦ºÉ°Šœ¸Ê x čo o°¤¼¨‹µ„š‡ªµ¤œ¸Ê x Á¦¸¥Á¦¸¥Š—oª¥£µ¬µ °Š˜´ªÁ°ŠÁ ¸¥œ—oª¥‡ªµ¤Á®¤µ³­¤ x Á ¸¥œÄ®oœnµ­œÄ‹ªœ˜·—˜µ¤¨³Ä®oœnµž¦³š´Ä‹Ä®oŸ¼o°nµœ¦¼o­¹„Å—o x Á ¸¥œÄ®oŗo‡ªµ¤¥µªÃ—¥Å¤nÁªoœ¦¦š´—ž¦³¤µ–®œ¹ÉŠ®œoµ ¹Êœ°¥¼n„´ œµ— ¨µ¥¤º°  >@

7 0518/02/M/J/14 © UCLES 2014 BLANK PAGE

8 0518/02/M/J/14 © UCLES 2014 Copyright Acknowledgements: Question 1 Question 2 Question 3 © www.ryt9.com; 15 June 2012. © www.matichon.co.th; 15 June 2012. © www.bangkokbiznews.com; 14 June 2012. Permission to reproduce items where third-party owned material protected by copyright is included has been sought and cleared where possible. Every reasonable effort has been made by the publisher (UCLES) to trace copyright holders, but if any items requiring clearance have unwittingly been included, the publisher will be pleased to make amends at the earliest possible opportunity. Cambridge International Examinations is part of the Cambridge Assessment Group. Cambridge Assessment is the brand name of University of Cambridge Local Examinations Syndicate (UCLES), which is itself a department of the University of Cambridge. BLANK PAGE

CAMBRIDGE INTERNATIONAL EXAMINATIONS International General Certificate of Secondary Education MARK SCHEME for the May/June 2014 series 0518 FIRST LANGUAGE THAI 0518/02 Paper 2 (Reading and Directed Writing), maximum raw mark 60 This mark scheme is published as an aid to teachers and candidates, to indicate the requirements of the examination. It shows the basis on which Examiners were instructed to award marks. It does not indicate the details of the discussions that took place at an Examiners’ meeting before marking began, which would have considered the acceptability of alternative answers. Mark schemes should be read in conjunction with the question paper and the Principal Examiner Report for Teachers. Cambridge will not enter into discussions about these mark schemes. Cambridge is publishing the mark schemes for the May/June 2014 series for most IGCSE, GCE Advanced Level and Advanced Subsidiary Level components and some Ordinary Level components. PAPA CAMBRIDGE

Page 2 Mark Scheme Syllabus Paper IGCSE – May/June 2014 0518 02 © Cambridge International Examinations 2014 Part 1: Question 1 (Summary from both texts) Contents and organisation: 15 Summary style: 5 Candidates need to write using their own language. Marks are awarded for content which is put together coherently. Please refer to the mark bands. Copying whole chunks of text cannot be rewarded. Below is an indication of what information the candidates could include. Content: [15 marks] The points below do not have to be in order, as long as it is coherent and well organised.

Page 3 Mark Scheme Syllabus Paper IGCSE – May/June 2014 0518 02 © Cambridge International Examinations 2014

Page 4 Mark Scheme Syllabus Paper IGCSE – May/June 2014 0518 02 © Cambridge International Examinations 2014 Band 1 [13 – 15] A very clear and precise summary Candidates make use of material efficiently and effectively, choosing relevant information accordingly – no detailed information or irrelevant information, or only a very small fraction which does not interfere with the summary. The text is clear and logical. Candidates do not put their opinion or point of view. They understand well what is necessary for a summary. Band 2 [10 – 12] A substantial summary Candidate is competent, using what is relevant. The passage has clear direction with relevant information. However, they might include some detailed information which is not relevant. And as a result, the summary has some parts which might not read well. But overall, candidates have shown competent summary skills. Band 3 [7 – 9] A weak summary Candidates find it difficult to select relevant information. The article is appealing, but the tone of the language might not be consistent. Either emotions or facts may be exaggerated or didactic. As a result, the summary is not quite convincing. It either reads like a narrative or an essay, in which candidates put their opinions or points of view. Some information has been lifted directly from the text. Band 4 [4 – 6] A very weak summary Candidates do not use the necessary information for the task and the result can be unconvincing and/or too emotional, although there is evidence that there is an attempt to convince the reader. Or it reads like a narrative. Or they use language in a didactic way. Or a lot of information has been lifted from the original texts. Band 5 [1 – 3] Limited and plain – hardly competent summary Candidates do not know how to select information – lots of irrelevant information or lots of opinions and facts from candidates themselves. Also, they do not make good use of emotive language. A rather weak summary and not at all convincing. Or most of the task is lifted from the texts without using their own language. Summary style (Conciseness, focus, use of own words and spelling) [5 marks] 5 Excellent, effective summary style throughout, focused. Structures and words are well-chosen and appropriate, in own words throughout, spelling is very good. Detail or unnecessary information is not there. 4 Generally good, effective summary style, concise and well-focused, in own words, spellings are good. Details or unnecessary information is hardly there. 3 Satisfactory, concise, although occasionally not consistent, reasonably focused and very occasional lifting from the texts, spellings are usually accurate although errors may occur. May contain unnecessary information. 2 Not very concise, tendency to lose focus, although the passage has been understood, fair chunk of lifting, some spelling mistakes. 1 Wrong genres: descriptive or discursive style with lots of candidates own opinions and information, frequently unfocused, evidence of lifting is seen throughout, lots of spelling mistakes when trying to use own words.

Page 5 Mark Scheme Syllabus Paper IGCSE – May/June 2014 0518 02 © Cambridge International Examinations 2014 Part 1: Question 2 Content and organisation: 15 Persuasive style: 5 Candidates write a script interviewing Mr Jadet Kamjorndeth mentioning the articles for the benefit of school friends during a School Book Fair: “Read books today for your good future”. The school would like to encourage children to love reading. Content: [15 marks] • Introduction – emphasise the purpose of the School Book Fair and why choose Jadet Kamjorndeth. • His biography • His opinions • His inspiration • Conclusion Note: The response should contain the above points. They do not have to be in this strict order, but the response needs to be coherent. Band 1 [13 – 15] A confident and persuasive article – a success Candidates make use of material efficiently and effectively. Facts and opinions are combined well, which appeals to the reader. Factual language and emotive language are suitable and blend in nicely, not didactic. Very convincing and the reader sees the importance of promoting this issue. Band 2 [10 – 12] Material and ideas integrated well – persuasive Candidate is competent, using what is relevant. The article is interesting and developed with a good sense of direction, appealing to the reader, though they might not be able to pick up all the information that is needed. The reader feels that what is said is valid and makes sense. Band 3 [7 – 9] Substantial piece of work Candidates make good use of material, though information and ideas may be repeated. The article is appealing, but the tone of the language might not be consistent. Either emotions or facts may be exaggerated or didactic. As a result, the writing is not quite convincing. Band 4 [4 – 6] Not quite balanced – not persuasive Candidates do not use the necessary information for the article and the result be unconvincing and/or too emotional, although there is evidence that there is an attempt to convince the reader. Or they use language to the point that it can be didactic. Band 5 [1 – 3] Limited and plain – hardly competent and not persuasive Candidates do not know how to select information—lots of irrelevant information or lots of opinions and facts from candidates themselves. Also, they do not make good use of emotive language. A rather weak article and not at all convincing.

Page 6 Mark Scheme Syllabus Paper IGCSE – May/June 2014 0518 02 © Cambridge International Examinations 2014 Written expression: Persuasive style: [5 marks] 5 Very good and there is a sense of coherence throughout the article. The writing is very smooth and flowing. Good structures and use of words appropriately in terms of styles. Spelling is excellent. 4 Good and coherent though the organisation can be a little bit confusing. Good structures and use of words are good. Spelling is excellent. 3 Fine – the coherence and organisation is substantial though in some places can be confusing or just plain. Structures and choice of words are plain and simple. Spelling can interfere with understanding. 2 Inconsistent in places. Structures and choices of words are plain and some parts can be inaccurate. Numerous spelling errors. 1 No coherence due to lack of understanding of how to write this genre. Spelling is poor.

Page 7 Mark Scheme Syllabus Paper IGCSE – May/June 2014 0518 02 © Cambridge International Examinations 2014 Part 2: Question 3 Content and organisation: 15 Written expression: 5 Write an article to promote the art of Thai traditional Shadow Puppets. Use Miss Anyamanee Seubsang's idea as a good example. Content: [15 marks] • Introduction - talking about Thai traditional shadow puppets: What Thai traditional shadow puppet is, and its difficulties • Who is Anyamanee? • Anyamanee's choice of choosing Thai traditional shadow puppets/ her inspiration and why • Her success • Persuasion - persuade and convince reader to support a tradition. Note: These do not have to be in order as long as the text reads logically. Also, if other information is added and it makes sense, it is acceptable. Band 1 [13 – 15] A confident and persuasive article – a success Candidates make use of material efficiently and effectively. Facts and opinions are combined well, which appeals to the reader. Factual language and emotive language are suitable and blend in nicely, not didactic. Very convincing and the reader sees the importance of promoting this issue. Band 2 [10 – 12] Material and ideas integrated well – persuasive Candidate is competent, using what is relevant. The article is interesting and developed with a good sense of direction, appealing to the reader, though they might not be able to pick up all the information that is needed. The reader feels that what is said is valid and makes sense. Band 3 [7 – 9] Substantial piece of work Candidates make good use of material, though information and ideas may be repeated. The article is appealing, but the tone of the language might not be consistent. Either emotions or facts may be exaggerated or didactic. As a result, the writing is as not quite convincing. Band 4 [4 – 6] Not quite balanced – not persuasive Candidates do not use the necessary information for the article and the result be unconvincing and/or too emotional, although there is evidence that there is an attempt to convince the reader. Or they use language to the point that it can be didactic. Band 5 [1 – 3] Limited and plain – hardly competent and not persuasive Candidates do not know how to select information—lots of irrelevant information or lots of opinions and facts from candidates themselves. Also, they do not make good use of emotive language. A rather weak article and not at all convincing.

Page 8 Mark Scheme Syllabus Paper IGCSE – May/June 2014 0518 02 © Cambridge International Examinations 2014 Written expression: Persuasive style: [5 marks] 5 Very good and there is a sense of coherence throughout the article. The writing is very smooth and flowing. Good structures and use of words appropriately in terms of styles. Spelling is excellent. 4 Good and coherent though the organisation can be a little bit confusing. Good structures and use of words are good. Spelling is excellent. 3 Fine – the coherence and organisation is substantial though in some places can be confusing or just plain. Structures and choice of words are plain and simple. Spelling can interfere with understanding. 2 Inconsistent in places. Structures and choices of words are plain and some parts can be inaccurate. Numerous spelling errors. 1 No coherence due to lack of understanding of how to write this genre. Spelling is poor.