Cambridge IGCSE Korean (First Language) 0521 — 2020 May/June Paper 2 · Variant 1

This document has 12 pages. Blank pages are indicated. NL 181661/1 © UCLES 2020 [Turn over Cambridge IGCSE™ FIRST LANGUAGE KOREAN 0521/21 Paper 2 Writing May/June 2020 2 hours You must answer on the question paper. No additional materials are needed. INSTRUCTIONS ● Answer two questions, one from Section 1 and one from Section 2. ● Use a black or dark blue pen. Do not use an erasable pen or correction fluid. ● Write your name, centre number and candidate number in the boxes at the top of the page. ● Write your answer to each question in the space provided. ● Do not write on any bar codes. ● Dictionaries are not allowed. INFORMATION ● The total mark for this paper is 50. ● Each question is worth 25 marks. 준수사항 ● Section 1에서 하나, Section 2에서 하나를 골라 두 문제에 답하십시오. ● 검은색이나 진한 파란색 펜으로 쓰십시오. 수정 가능한 펜이나 수정액을 사용하지 마십시오. ● 수험자 성명, 시험 센터 번호와 수험자 번호를 이 페이지 위쪽 해당란에 써 주십시오. ● 각 문항 해당 답안란에 답을 쓰십시오. ● 바코드에는 절대 아무것도 쓰지 마십시오. ● 사전은 사용할 수 없습니다. 유의사항 ● 총 50 점이 주어집니다. ● 각 문항당 25 점이 주어집니다. * 3 7 3 9 9 0 4 3 9 5 *

2 0521/21/M/J/20 © UCLES 2020 두 가지 주제를 골라 각각 350–500 단어로 두 개의 작문을 쓰십시오. 각 작문은 25 점 만점입니다. 이 중 문장력과 정확성은 12 점, 내용과 구성은 13 점입니다. Section 1 에서 하나, Section 2 에서 하나를 고르십시오. Section 1 토론과 주장 1 다음 중에서 하나를 고르십시오. (a) ‘유전자 조작 농산물(GMO)의 생산이나 유통을 모두 금지해야 한다’는 주장에 동의합니까? 반대합니까? 논하십시오. 또는 (b) 만 15세 이상의 청소년이 노동자로서 누려야 할 정당한 권리를 알기 위해 ‘학교 교과 과정에서 청소년 근로기준법을 의무적으로 가르쳐야 한다’는 주장에 동의합니까? 반대합니까? 논하십시오. 또는 (c) ‘인터넷 뉴스의 경우, 댓글을 실명제로 해야 한다’는 주장에 동의합니까? 반대합니까? 자신의 주장을 논하십시오. 또는 (d) ‘사람을 물어 해를 입히거나 사망에 이르게 한 개는 안락사시킬 수 있다’는 주장에 동의합니까? 반대합니까? 자신의 주장을 논하십시오. … … … … … … … … … … … …

3 0521/21/M/J/20 © UCLES 2020 [Turn over … … … … … … … … … … … … … … … … … … … … … … … … … … … …

4 0521/21/M/J/20 © UCLES 2020 … … … … … … … … … … … … … … … … … … … … … … … … … … … …

5 0521/21/M/J/20 © UCLES 2020 [Turn over … … … … … … … … … … … … … … … … … … … … … … … … … … … …

6 0521/21/M/J/20 © UCLES 2020 … … … … … … … … … … … … … … … … … … … … … … … … … … … …

7 0521/21/M/J/20 © UCLES 2020 [Turn over Section 2 묘사와 서술 2 다음 중에서 하나를 고르십시오. (a) ‘나에게 잊을 수 없는 그 날’을 다양한 감각을 통해 생생하게 묘사하십시오. 또는 (b) ‘우리 집에서 내가 제일 좋아하는 공간’을 다양한 감각을 통해 생생하게 묘사하십시오. 또는 (c) ‘승강기(엘리베이터)’가 중요한 공간적 배경이 되는 이야기를 만들어 쓰십시오. 또는 (d) ‘외할머니 댁’을 주제로 이야기를 만들어 쓰십시오. … … … … … … … … … … … … … … … … …

8 0521/21/M/J/20 © UCLES 2020 … … … … … … … … … … … … … … … … … … … … … … … … … … … …

9 0521/21/M/J/20 © UCLES 2020 [Turn over … … … … … … … … … … … … … … … … … … … … … … … … … … … …

10 0521/21/M/J/20 © UCLES 2020 … … … … … … … … … … … … … … … … … … … … … … … … … … … …

11 0521/21/M/J/20 © UCLES 2020 … … … … … … … … … … … … … … … … … … … … … … … … … … … …

12 0521/21/M/J/20 © UCLES 2020 BLANK PAGE Permission to reproduce items where third-party owned material protected by copyright is included has been sought and cleared where possible. Every reasonable effort has been made by the publisher (UCLES) to trace copyright holders, but if any items requiring clearance have unwittingly been included, the publisher will be pleased to make amends at the earliest possible opportunity. To avoid the issue of disclosure of answer-related information to candidates, all copyright acknowledgements are reproduced online in the Cambridge Assessment International Education Copyright Acknowledgements Booklet. This is produced for each series of examinations and is freely available to download at www.cambridgeinternational.org after the live examination series. Cambridge Assessment International Education is part of the Cambridge Assessment Group. Cambridge Assessment is the brand name of the University of Cambridge Local Examinations Syndicate (UCLES), which itself is a department of the University of Cambridge.

This document consists of 5 printed pages. © UCLES 2020 [Turn over Cambridge IGCSE™ FIRST LANGUAGE KOREAN 0521/21 Paper 2 Writing May/June 2020 MARK SCHEME Maximum Mark: 50 Published Students did not sit exam papers in the June 2020 series due to the Covid-19 global pandemic. This mark scheme is published to support teachers and students and should be read together with the question paper. It shows the requirements of the exam. The answer column of the mark scheme shows the proposed basis on which Examiners would award marks for this exam. Where appropriate, this column also provides the most likely acceptable alternative responses expected from students. Examiners usually review the mark scheme after they have seen student responses and update the mark scheme if appropriate. In the June series, Examiners were unable to consider the acceptability of alternative responses, as there were no student responses to consider. Mark schemes should usually be read together with the Principal Examiner Report for Teachers. However, because students did not sit exam papers, there is no Principal Examiner Report for Teachers for the June 2020 series. Cambridge International will not enter into discussions about these mark schemes. Cambridge International is publishing the mark schemes for the June 2020 series for most Cambridge IGCSE™ and Cambridge International A & AS Level components, and some Cambridge O Level components.

0521/21 Cambridge IGCSE – Mark Scheme PUBLISHED May/June 2020 © UCLES 2020 Page 2 of 5 Generic Marking Principles These general marking principles must be applied by all examiners when marking candidate answers. They should be applied alongside the specific content of the mark scheme or generic level descriptors for a question. Each question paper and mark scheme will also comply with these marking principles. GENERIC MARKING PRINCIPLE 1: Marks must be awarded in line with: • the specific content of the mark scheme or the generic level descriptors for the question • the specific skills defined in the mark scheme or in the generic level descriptors for the question • the standard of response required by a candidate as exemplified by the standardisation scripts. GENERIC MARKING PRINCIPLE 2: Marks awarded are always whole marks (not half marks, or other fractions). GENERIC MARKING PRINCIPLE 3: Marks must be awarded positively: • marks are awarded for correct/valid answers, as defined in the mark scheme. However, credit is given for valid answers which go beyond the scope of the syllabus and mark scheme, referring to your Team Leader as appropriate • marks are awarded when candidates clearly demonstrate what they know and can do • marks are not deducted for errors • marks are not deducted for omissions • answers should only be judged on the quality of spelling, punctuation and grammar when these features are specifically assessed by the question as indicated by the mark scheme. The meaning, however, should be unambiguous. GENERIC MARKING PRINCIPLE 4: Rules must be applied consistently e.g. in situations where candidates have not followed instructions or in the application of generic level descriptors. GENERIC MARKING PRINCIPLE 5: Marks should be awarded using the full range of marks defined in the mark scheme for the question (however; the use of the full mark range may be limited according to the quality of the candidate responses seen). GENERIC MARKING PRINCIPLE 6: Marks awarded are based solely on the requirements as defined in the mark scheme. Marks should not be awarded with grade thresholds or grade descriptors in mind.

0521/21 Cambridge IGCSE – Mark Scheme PUBLISHED May/June 2020 © UCLES 2020 Page 3 of 5 Candidates will be awarded marks in two categories for each of the two compositions they write: • the first mark is out of 12 for Style and Accuracy: see Table A; • the second mark is out of 13 for Content and Structure: see Table B1, B2 or B3 (depending on the type of composition: Argumentative, Descriptive or Narrative). TABLE A – STYLE AND ACCURACY Band 1 11–12 • Fluent; variety of well-made sentences, including sophisticated complex sentences where appropriate, used to achieve particular effects. • Wide, consistently effective range of vocabulary with appropriately used ambitious words. • Assured use of grammar and punctuation, spelling accurate. Band 2 9–10 • Mostly fluent; sentences correctly constructed, including a variety of complex sentences. • Vocabulary often effective, sometimes complex, mostly varied. • Grammatically correct; punctuation mostly correct between and within sentences; very occasional spelling mistakes. Band 3 7–8 • Occasional fluency; sentences of some variety and complexity, correctly constructed. • Appropriate and accurate vocabulary with occasional examples of choice made to communicate precise meaning or to give interest. • Simple grammatical terms correct; sentence separation mostly correct but other forms of punctuation sometimes inconsistently used; occasional spelling mistakes – but no error of any sort impedes communication. Band 4 5–6 • Sentences tend to be simple and patterns repetitive. Where more complicated structures are attempted there is lack of clarity and inaccuracy. • Vocabulary communicates general meaning accurately. • Some errors of punctuation including sentence separation; several spelling and grammatical errors, rarely serious. Band 5 3–4 • There may be the occasional grammatically complex sentence but mostly these are simple and repetitively joined by ‘and’ ‘but’ and ‘so’ with other conjunctions being used ineffectively, if at all. • Vocabulary communicates simple details/facts accurately. • Many errors of punctuation, grammar and spelling, but the overall meaning is never in doubt. Band 6 1–2 • Sentences are simple and sometimes faulty and/or rambling sentences obscure meaning. • Vocabulary is limited and may be inaccurate. • Errors of punctuation, grammar and spelling may be serious enough to impede meaning. 0 • Meaning of the writing is often lost because of poor control of language; errors of punctuation, grammar and spelling too intrusive to award a mark in Band 6.

0521/21 Cambridge IGCSE – Mark Scheme PUBLISHED May/June 2020 © UCLES 2020 Page 4 of 5 TABLE B1 – ARGUMENTATIVE/DISCURSIVE TASKS Band 1 11–13 • There is a consistent quality of well developed, logical stages in an overall, at times complex argument. • Each stage is linked to and follows the preceding one. Sentences within paragraphs are soundly sequenced. Band 2 9–10 • Each stage of the argument is defined and developed, although the quality of the explanation may not be consistent. • The stages follow in a generally cohesive progression. Paragraphs are mostly well sequenced, although some may finish less strongly than they begin. Band 3 7–8 • There is a series of relevant points and a clear attempt is made to develop some of them. These points are relevant, straightforward and logical/ coherent. • Repetition is avoided, but the order of the stages in the overall argument can be changed without adverse effect. The sequence of the sentences within paragraphs is satisfactory, although opportunities to link ideas may not be taken. Band 4 5–6 • Mainly relevant points are made and they are developed partially with some effectiveness. • The overall argument shows signs of structure but may be sounder at the beginning than at the end. There may be some repetition. It is normally possible to follow sequences of ideas, but there may be intrusive ideas or misleading sentences. Band 5 3–4 • A few relevant points are made and although they are expanded into paragraphs, development is very simple and not always logical. • Overall structure lacks a sense of sequencing. Paragraphs used only for obvious divisions. It is sometimes possible to follow sequencing of sentences within paragraphs. Band 6 1–2 • A few points are discernible but any attempt to develop them is very limited. • Overall argument only progresses here and there and the sequence of sentences is poor. 0 • Rarely relevant, little material, and presented In a disorderly structure. Not sufficient to be placed in Band 6.

0521/21 Cambridge IGCSE – Mark Scheme PUBLISHED May/June 2020 © UCLES 2020 Page 5 of 5 TABLE B2 – DESCRIPTIVE TASKS Band 1 11–13 • There are many well defined, well developed ideas and images, describing complex atmospheres with a range of details. • Overall structure is provided through devices such as the movements of the writer, the creation of a short time span, or the creation of atmosphere or tension. Focus is description (not storytelling). Repetition is avoided and the sequence of sentences makes the picture clear to the reader. Band 2 9–10 • There is a good selection of interesting ideas and images, with a range of details. • These are formed into an overall picture of some clarity, largely consistent. There may be occasional repetition and opportunities for development or the provision of detail may be missed. Sentences are often well sequenced and the description is often effective. Band 3 7–8 • There is a selection of effective ideas and images that are relevant to the topic and which satisfactorily address the task. An attempt is made to create atmosphere and to provide some details. • The description provides a series of points rather than a sense of their being combined to make an overall picture, but some of the ideas are developed successfully, albeit straightforwardly. Some sentences are well sequenced. Band 4 5–6 • Some relevant and effective ideas are provided and occasionally developed a little, perhaps as a narrative. There is some feeling of atmosphere, but most of the writing is about events or description of objects or people. • There is some overall structure, but the writing may lack direction and intent. There may be interruptions in the sequence of sentences and/or some lack of clarity. Band 5 3–4 • Content is relevant but lacking in scope or variety. Opportunities to provide development and detail are frequently missed. • Overall structure, though readily discernible, lacks form and dimension. • The reliance on identifying events, objects and/or people sometimes leads to a sequence of sentences without progression. Band 6 1–2 • Some relevant facts are identified, but the overall picture is unclear and lacks development. • There are examples of sequenced sentences, but there is also repetition and muddled ordering. 0 • Rarely relevant, little material and presented in a disorderly structure. Not sufficient to be placed in Band 6.