Cambridge IGCSE Korean (First Language) 0521 — 2018 May/June Paper 2 · Variant 2

This document consists of 11 printed pages and 1 blank page. NL 152795/1 © UCLES 2018 [Turn over Cambridge International Examinations Cambridge International General Certificate of Secondary Education FIRST LANGUAGE KOREAN 0521/22 Paper 2 Writing May/June 2018 2 hours Candidates answer on the Question Paper. No Additional Materials are required. READ THESE INSTRUCTIONS FIRST Write your Centre number, candidate number and name in the spaces at the top of this page. Write in dark blue or black pen. Do not use staples, paper clips, glue or correction fluid. DO NOT WRITE IN ANY BARCODES. Answer two questions, one from Section 1 and one from Section 2. Answer in the spaces provided. Dictionaries are not permitted. You should write between 350 and 500 words for each answer. All questions on this paper carry equal marks. * 1 4 3 9 7 4 9 6 4 2 *

2 0521/22/M/J/18 © UCLES 2018 두 가지 주제를 골라 각각 350–500 단어로 두 개의 작문을 쓰십시오. 각 작문은 25 점 만점입니다. 이 중 문장력과 정확성은 12 점, 내용과 구성은 13 점입니다. Section 1 에서 하나, Section 2 에서 하나를 고르십시오. Section 1 토론과 주장 (a) ‘역사는 인류에 더 이로운 방향으로 나아가고 있다’는 말에 동의합니까? 반대합니까? 자신의 입장을 논하십시오. 또는 (b) ‘도시의 화려한 밤 조명은 빛 공해이므로, 관광 산업을 위한 지나친 도시 밤 조명은 중지되어야 한다’는 주장에 찬성합니까? 반대합니까? 논하십시오. 또는 (c) 태어나자마자 한 살이 되는 ‘한국식 나이’는 세계화 시대에 혼란을 일으키므로 ‘만 나이’로 통일해서 사용해야 한다는 주장에 동의합니까? 반대합니까? 논하십시오. 또는 (d) 한국에서 필요한 때 필요한 시간만큼 돈을 주고 애완동물을 빌릴 수 있는 대여업체가 늘고 있습니다. ‘동물을 무책임하게 기르다가 버리기보다는 애완동물 대여가 더 합리적이다’는 주장에 동의합니까? 반대합니까? 자신의 입장을 논하십시오. … … … … … … … … … … … … …

3 0521/22/M/J/18 © UCLES 2018 [Turn over … … … … … … … … … … … … … … … … … … … … … … … … … … … …

4 0521/22/M/J/18 © UCLES 2018 … … … … … … … … … … … … … … … … … … … … … … … … … … … …

5 0521/22/M/J/18 © UCLES 2018 [Turn over … … … … … … … … … … … … … … … … … … … … … … … … … … … …

6 0521/22/M/J/18 © UCLES 2018 … … … … … … … … … … … … … … … … … … … … … … … … … … … …

7 0521/22/M/J/18 © UCLES 2018 [Turn over Section 2 묘사와 서술 (a) ‘내가 살고 싶은 집’을 다양한 감각을 통해 묘사하십시오. 또는 (b) ‘나를 슬프게 하는 것들’을 다양한 감각을 통해 묘사하십시오. 또는 (c) 눈 내린 겨울 늦은 오후, 작은 기차역에서 서로 다른 사연을 지닌 사람들이 오지 않는 기차를 기다립니다. 이 사람들 사이에서 벌어지는 이야기를 만들어 쓰십시오. 또는 (d) ‘새벽길’을 주제로 이야기를 만들어 쓰십시오. … … … … … … … … … … … … … … … … …

8 0521/22/M/J/18 © UCLES 2018 … … … … … … … … … … … … … … … … … … … … … … … … … … … …

9 0521/22/M/J/18 © UCLES 2018 [Turn over … … … … … … … … … … … … … … … … … … … … … … … … … … … …

10 0521/22/M/J/18 © UCLES 2018 … … … … … … … … … … … … … … … … … … … … … … … … … … … …

11 0521/22/M/J/18 © UCLES 2018 … … … … … … … … … … … … … … … … … … … … … … … … … … … …

12 0521/22/M/J/18 © UCLES 2018 Permission to reproduce items where third-party owned material protected by copyright is included has been sought and cleared where possible. Every reasonable effort has been made by the publisher (UCLES) to trace copyright holders, but if any items requiring clearance have unwittingly been included, the publisher will be pleased to make amends at the earliest possible opportunity. To avoid the issue of disclosure of answer-related information to candidates, all copyright acknowledgements are reproduced online in the Cambridge International Examinations Copyright Acknowledgements Booklet. This is produced for each series of examinations and is freely available to download at www.cie.org.uk after the live examination series. Cambridge International Examinations is part of the Cambridge Assessment Group. Cambridge Assessment is the brand name of University of Cambridge Local Examinations Syndicate (UCLES), which is itself a department of the University of Cambridge. BLANK PAGE

IGCSE™ is a registered trademark. This document consists of 5 printed pages. © UCLES 2018 [Turn over Cambridge Assessment International Education Cambridge International General Certificate of Secondary Education FIRST LANGUAGE KOREAN 0521/22 Paper 2 Writing May/June 2018 MARK SCHEME Maximum Mark: 50 Published This mark scheme is published as an aid to teachers and candidates, to indicate the requirements of the examination. It shows the basis on which Examiners were instructed to award marks. It does not indicate the details of the discussions that took place at an Examiners’ meeting before marking began, which would have considered the acceptability of alternative answers. Mark schemes should be read in conjunction with the question paper and the Principal Examiner Report for Teachers. Cambridge International will not enter into discussions about these mark schemes. Cambridge International is publishing the mark schemes for the May/June 2018 series for most Cambridge IGCSE™, Cambridge International A and AS Level and Cambridge Pre-U components, and some Cambridge O Level components.

0521/22 Cambridge IGCSE – Mark Scheme PUBLISHED May/June 2018 © UCLES 2018 Page 2 of 5 Generic Marking Principles These general marking principles must be applied by all examiners when marking candidate answers. They should be applied alongside the specific content of the mark scheme or generic level descriptors for a question. Each question paper and mark scheme will also comply with these marking principles. GENERIC MARKING PRINCIPLE 1: Marks must be awarded in line with: • the specific content of the mark scheme or the generic level descriptors for the question • the specific skills defined in the mark scheme or in the generic level descriptors for the question • the standard of response required by a candidate as exemplified by the standardisation scripts. GENERIC MARKING PRINCIPLE 2: Marks awarded are always whole marks (not half marks, or other fractions). GENERIC MARKING PRINCIPLE 3: Marks must be awarded positively: • marks are awarded for correct/valid answers, as defined in the mark scheme. However, credit is given for valid answers which go beyond the scope of the syllabus and mark scheme, referring to your Team Leader as appropriate • marks are awarded when candidates clearly demonstrate what they know and can do • marks are not deducted for errors • marks are not deducted for omissions • answers should only be judged on the quality of spelling, punctuation and grammar when these features are specifically assessed by the question as indicated by the mark scheme. The meaning, however, should be unambiguous. GENERIC MARKING PRINCIPLE 4: Rules must be applied consistently e.g. in situations where candidates have not followed instructions or in the application of generic level descriptors. GENERIC MARKING PRINCIPLE 5: Marks should be awarded using the full range of marks defined in the mark scheme for the question (however; the use of the full mark range may be limited according to the quality of the candidate responses seen). GENERIC MARKING PRINCIPLE 6: Marks awarded are based solely on the requirements as defined in the mark scheme. Marks should not be awarded with grade thresholds or grade descriptors in mind.

0521/22 Cambridge IGCSE – Mark Scheme PUBLISHED May/June 2018 © UCLES 2018 Page 3 of 5 Candidates will be awarded marks in two categories for each of the two compositions they write: • the first mark is out of 12 for Style and Accuracy: see Table A; • the second mark is out of 13 for Content and Structure: see Table B1, B2 or B3 (depending on the type of composition: Argumentative, Descriptive or Narrative). TABLE A – STYLE AND ACCURACY Band 1 11–12 • Fluent; variety of well-made sentences, including sophisticated complex sentences where appropriate, used to achieve particular effects. • Wide, consistently effective range of vocabulary with appropriately used ambitious words. • Assured use of grammar and punctuation, spelling accurate. Band 2 9–10 • Mostly fluent; sentences correctly constructed, including a variety of complex sentences. • Vocabulary often effective, sometimes complex, mostly varied. • Grammatically correct; punctuation mostly correct between and within sentences; very occasional spelling mistakes. Band 3 7–8 • Occasional fluency; sentences of some variety and complexity, correctly constructed. • Appropriate and accurate vocabulary with occasional examples of choice made to communicate precise meaning or to give interest. • Simple grammatical terms correct; sentence separation mostly correct but other forms of punctuation sometimes inconsistently used; occasional spelling mistakes – but no error of any sort impedes communication. Band 4 5–6 • Sentences tend to be simple and patterns repetitive. Where more complicated structures are attempted there is lack of clarity and inaccuracy. • Vocabulary communicates general meaning accurately. • Some errors of punctuation including sentence separation; several spelling and grammatical errors, rarely serious. Band 5 3–4 • There may be the occasional grammatically complex sentence but mostly these are simple and repetitively joined by ‘and’ ‘but’ and ‘so’ with other conjunctions being used ineffectively, if at all. • Vocabulary communicates simple details/facts accurately. • Many errors of punctuation, grammar and spelling, but the overall meaning is never in doubt. Band 6 1–2 • Sentences are simple and sometimes faulty and/or rambling sentences obscure meaning. • Vocabulary is limited and may be inaccurate. • Errors of punctuation, grammar and spelling may be serious enough to impede meaning. 0 • Meaning of the writing is often lost because of poor control of language; errors of punctuation, grammar and spelling too intrusive to award a mark in Band 6.

0521/22 Cambridge IGCSE – Mark Scheme PUBLISHED May/June 2018 © UCLES 2018 Page 4 of 5 TABLE B1 – ARGUMENTATIVE/DISCURSIVE TASKS Band 1 11–13 • There is a consistent quality of well developed, logical stages in an overall, at times complex argument. • Each stage is linked to and follows the preceding one. Sentences within paragraphs are soundly sequenced. Band 2 9–10 • Each stage of the argument is defined and developed, although the quality of the explanation may not be consistent. • The stages follow in a generally cohesive progression. Paragraphs are mostly well sequenced, although some may finish less strongly than they begin. Band 3 7–8 • There is a series of relevant points and a clear attempt is made to develop some of them. These points are relevant, straightforward and logical/ coherent. • Repetition is avoided, but the order of the stages in the overall argument can be changed without adverse effect. The sequence of the sentences within paragraphs is satisfactory, although opportunities to link ideas may not be taken. Band 4 5–6 • Mainly relevant points are made and they are developed partially with some effectiveness. • The overall argument shows signs of structure but may be sounder at the beginning than at the end. There may be some repetition. It is normally possible to follow sequences of ideas, but there may be intrusive ideas or misleading sentences. Band 5 3–4 • A few relevant points are made and although they are expanded into paragraphs, development is very simple and not always logical. • Overall structure lacks a sense of sequencing. Paragraphs used only for obvious divisions. It is sometimes possible to follow sequencing of sentences within paragraphs. Band 6 1–2 • A few points are discernible but any attempt to develop them is very limited. • Overall argument only progresses here and there and the sequence of sentences is poor. 0 • Rarely relevant, little material, and presented In a disorderly structure. Not sufficient to be placed in Band 6.

0521/22 Cambridge IGCSE – Mark Scheme PUBLISHED May/June 2018 © UCLES 2018 Page 5 of 5 TABLE B2 – DESCRIPTIVE TASKS Band 1 11–13 • There are many well defined, well developed ideas and images, describing complex atmospheres with a range of details. • Overall structure is provided through devices such as the movements of the writer, the creation of a short time span, or the creation of atmosphere or tension. Focus is description (not storytelling). Repetition is avoided and the sequence of sentences makes the picture clear to the reader. Band 2 9–10 • There is a good selection of interesting ideas and images, with a range of details. • These are formed into an overall picture of some clarity, largely consistent. There may be occasional repetition and opportunities for development or the provision of detail may be missed. Sentences are often well sequenced and the description is often effective. Band 3 7–8 • There is a selection of effective ideas and images that are relevant to the topic and which satisfactorily address the task. An attempt is made to create atmosphere and to provide some details. • The description provides a series of points rather than a sense of their being combined to make an overall picture, but some of the ideas are developed successfully, albeit straightforwardly. Some sentences are well sequenced. Band 4 5–6 • Some relevant and effective ideas are provided and occasionally developed a little, perhaps as a narrative. There is some feeling of atmosphere, but most of the writing is about events or description of objects or people. • There is some overall structure, but the writing may lack direction and intent. There may be interruptions in the sequence of sentences and/or some lack of clarity. Band 5 3–4 • Content is relevant but lacking in scope or variety. Opportunities to provide development and detail are frequently missed. • Overall structure, though readily discernible, lacks form and dimension. • The reliance on identifying events, objects and/or people sometimes leads to a sequence of sentences without progression. Band 6 1–2 • Some relevant facts are identified, but the overall picture is unclear and lacks development. • There are examples of sequenced sentences, but there is also repetition and muddled ordering. 0 • Rarely relevant, little material and presented in a disorderly structure. Not sufficient to be placed in Band 6.