Cambridge IGCSE Computer Studies 0420 — 2014 Oct/Nov Paper 3 · Variant 3
0420/33/O/N/14 · 1 question · 60 marks · ≈68 min
The question paper and its mark scheme, free to read here and free to download. This is Cambridge’s own paper, exactly as it was sat.
Question paper12 pages












Mark scheme6 pages
Answers below. Sit the paper first if you are practising.






Questions as text
Q1 · Give three tools that the systems analyst could use to check the progress of this project
1 (a) Give three tools that the systems analyst could use to check the progress of this project. 1 ................................................................................................................................................. ................................................................................................................................................... 2 ................................................................................................................................................. ................................................................................................................................................... 3 ................................................................................................................................................. ...............................................................................................................................................[3] (b) The systems analyst wants to find out about the existing recording system from the students who have used it. (i) State one method that would be appropriate and explain why the systems analyst should choose that method. Method: ............................................................................................................................. Explanation:........................................................................................................................ ........................................................................................................................................... ........................................................................................................................................... ........................................................................................................................................... .......................................................................................................................................[3] (ii) State one method that would not be appropriate and explain why the systems analyst should not choose that method. Method: ............................................................................................................................. Explanation:........................................................................................................................ ........................................................................................................................................... ........................................................................................................................................... ........................................................................................................................................... .......................................................................................................................................[3] (c) (i) Draw a design for an intranet page to display a weekly class total. [4] (ii) Describe how you made this intranet page both informative and interesting. ........................................................................................................................................... ........................................................................................................................................... ........................................................................................................................................... ........................................................................................................................................... ........................................................................................................................................... ........................................................................................................................................... ........................................................................................................................................... .......................................................................................................................................[4]
Mark scheme: 1 (a) Any three points from: – Gantt chart – Pert chart – Project Management (Software) – Spreadsheet (software) – Calendar software [3] (b) (i) Method: – questionnaire/survey Explanation: any 2 points – asks standard questions – ...so results can be analysed – no need for analyst to be present – more efficient for many students – incentives to return questionnaire, etc. Method: – interview Explanation: any 2 points – only needs to interview class treasurers – can ask follow up questions, etc. Method: – observation Explanation: any 2 points – gets reliable information – gets information first hand – sees exactly what is happening [3] (ii) none of the below are suitable, the explanation must match the method and explain why the method is not suitable Method: – interview Explanation: any 2 points – too many students to interview – ...so very time consuming – difficult to consolidate a variety of answers Method: – observation Explanation: any 2 points – students may find this intimidating – very time consuming for a small system Method: – document search Explanation: any 2 points – would not obtain opinions from students – documents may no longer be available [3] (c) (i) Content – appropriate title, e.g. Class 3 Charity Totals – total so far in figures – graphical representation of Total – increase each week shown – date/week One mark for any one of these to a maximum of 3 marks Layout – intranet page is well laid out, e.g. heading, use of school/charity logo, background, etc. – looks like an intranet page – not a web form One mark for any one of these to a maximum of 2 marks Maximum total marks 4 [4] (ii) Informative – inclusion of class number/name – inclusion of total amount – inclusion of date or week – inclusion of title – inclusion of logo/school/charity name – inclusion of further info about fundraising One mark for any one of these to a maximum of 3 marks Interesting – graphical representation of total (so far) – use of colour for, e.g. different colours for different weeks – use of appropriate multimedia One mark for any one of these to a maximum of 3 marks Maximum total marks 4 [4] (d) (i) Laptop – easily portable round school/can be used anywhere, etc. Smart phone – always with students/familiar with using it, etc. [2] (ii) netbook/tablet/phablet/desktop [1] (e) One mark for every two correct symbols A Process B Disk/file storage C Keyboard/manual entry D Hard copy/document output E Sort/allow decision box F Input/output G Terminator/Start and End H Connector [4] 0, 1 – no marks 2, 3 – one mark 4, 5 – two marks 6, 7 – three marks 8 – four marks. (f) One mark per process, max 4 – adding donation to class total/spreadsheet – adding profit made to class total/spreadsheet – adding amount to class total/spreadsheet (if marks not given for either of the above) – updating school total (master spreadsheet) – transferring current total to intranet – updating intranet page One mark per input, max 2 – student name, (date), class, amount – event name, (date), class, profit – current total/amount raised this week One mark per data store, max 2 – class records/spreadsheet – master records/spreadsheet – spreadsheet/donations or fundraising records (only if none of the above are given) One mark per output, max 2 – intranet pages (screen) – class spreadsheet (allow examples, e.g. graphs charts, etc.) – master spreadsheet (allow examples, e.g. graphs charts, etc.) [8] (g) (i) One mark per point, e.g. – software already available – compatible with other software in use at the school – students familiar with using spreadsheets – good graphical output for use with intranet pages – contact the programmer if there is a problem – programmer already familiar with spreadsheet functionality – available as a phone app [3] (ii) One mark per point, e.g. – many unused features – may not meet exact requirements – licences required for use of software – programmers are expensive to employ [2] (h) One mark per type, one mark per example must be for donation, one mark per reason must match example. The following are examples only; there are many correct answers. – normal – $2.50 – this checks that system can accept appropriate inputs – erroneous/abnormal – -$2.00 – checks that negative numbers are rejected – boundary/extreme – $10.00 – checks that boundary/extreme data is accepted [9] (i) Marking points – initialisation – loop control – input amount of donation – check in range 1.00 – …to 10.00 – output error message – increment error count – exit if 3 attempts have been made – continue if donation valid Sample algorithm error_count = 0 (1) repeat input donation (1) if donation < 1 or donation > 10 (2) then print “Donation amount must be between $1 and $10” (1) error_count = error_count +1 (1) else error_count = -1 (1) until error_count = -1 or error_count = 3 (1) if error_count = 3 then exit (1) [6] (j) Max two marks per advantage One mark per advantage, one mark per suitable example that clearly relates to the school charity donation system (the following are just examples) – fewer errors – donations are only recorded once – less likelihood for information to be lost – backups can be made of the spreadsheet more easily than making copies of the class record books – takes less time for class treasurers – entries no longer need to be copied when payments are taken to the school office – output looks more professional – intranet pages rather than hand drawn on paper [6] (k) up to two points from – consider if objectives of new system have been met – look at results from tests – discuss with school office staff whether or not new system works – ask the students – whether or not the new system was easy to use [2]
What you needed in this session
Cambridge’s own grade thresholds for 2014 Oct/Nov, Paper 3 · Variant 3. A higher threshold means an easier paper — the bar moves with how the cohort did.