Cambridge A Level Psychology (from 2018) 9990 — 2023 May/June Paper 1 · Variant 3

This document has 12 pages. Any blank pages are indicated. [Turn over Cambridge International AS & A Level * 9 9 5 7 1 9 7 5 1 1 * DC (EF) 313195/2 © UCLES 2023 PSYCHOLOGY 9990/13 Paper 1 Approaches, Issues and Debates May/June 2023 1 hour 30 minutes You must answer on the question paper. No additional materials are needed. INSTRUCTIONS ● Answer all questions. ● Use a black or dark blue pen. You may use an HB pencil for any diagrams or graphs. ● Write your name, centre number and candidate number in the boxes at the top of the page. ● Write your answer to each question in the space provided. ● Do not use an erasable pen or correction fluid. ● Do not write on any bar codes. INFORMATION ● The total mark for this paper is 60. ● The number of marks for each question or part question is shown in brackets [ ].

2 9990/13/M/J/23 © UCLES 2023 Answer all questions. 1 From the study by Schachter and Singer (two factors in emotion): (a) Identify which one of the following groups scored the lowest on the Activity Index in the Euphoria condition. Epinephrine Ignorant (Epi Ign) Epinephrine Informed (Epi Inf) Epinephrine Misinformed (Epi Mis) Placebo [1] (b) In the Anger condition, an observer recorded the participant’s response to the stooge using several categories. Outline how the category of ‘Neutral’ was operationalised in this study. … … … … [2] 2 From the study by Piliavin et al. (subway Samaritans): (a) Name two measures observed for every participant who helped a victim. 1 … 2 … [2] (b) Identify one methodological strength of this study. … … [1]

3 9990/13/M/J/23 © UCLES 2023 [Turn over 3 In the final part of the study by Bandura et al. (aggression), each participant spent 20 minutes in the experimental room and their behaviour was observed through a one‑way mirror. (a) Outline the procedure for this final part of the study. … … … … … … [3] (b) Explain one weakness of this final part of the study. … … … … [2]

4 9990/13/M/J/23 © UCLES 2023 4 From the study by Milgram (obedience): (a) Describe the feedback from the learner (victim) that was given to the teacher (participant) during this study. … … … … … … … … [4] (b) One conclusion was that people find it stressful to follow destructive orders from a person in authority. Outline one other conclusion from this study. … … … … [2]

5 9990/13/M/J/23 © UCLES 2023 [Turn over 5 In Experiment 2 of the study by Laney et al. (false memory), participants completed both the Food History Inventory and photograph ratings of food items. Describe one result from the Food History Inventory and one result from the photograph ratings of food items. You must use data for one of these results. Result – Food History Inventory … … … … … Result – photograph ratings … … … … … [5]

6 9990/13/M/J/23 © UCLES 2023 6 Outline two assumptions of the learning approach. You must use an example from a core study for each assumption. 1 … … … … … … 2 … … … … … … [6] 7 Suggest two real‑world applications based on the study by Baron‑Cohen et al. (eyes test). Your suggestions must be ethical. 1 … … … … 2 … … … … [4]

7 9990/13/M/J/23 © UCLES 2023 [Turn over 8 Two friends, Maria and Oscar, are discussing the ethics of the study by Saavedra and Silverman (button phobia). Maria thinks the study is ethical but Oscar thinks the study is not ethical. Explain one reason why Maria is correct and one reason why Oscar is correct, using evidence from this study. Maria (ethical) … … … … … … … Oscar (not ethical) … … … … … … … [6]

8 9990/13/M/J/23 © UCLES 2023 9 From the study by Yamamoto et al. (chimpanzee helping): (a) Outline what is meant by altruism. … … … … [2] (b) Outline what is meant by targeted helping. … … … … [2]

9 9990/13/M/J/23 © UCLES 2023 [Turn over (c) Explain one similarity and one difference between the study by Yamamoto et al. (chimpanzee helping) and the study by Pepperberg (parrot learning). … … … … … … … … … … … … … … … … [8]

10 9990/13/M/J/23 © UCLES 2023 10 Evaluate the study by Dement and Kleitman (sleep and dreams) in terms of two strengths and two weaknesses. At least one of your evaluation points must be about reliability. … … … … … … … … … … … … … … … … … … … … … … … … … … …

11 9990/13/M/J/23 © UCLES 2023 … … … … … … … … … … … … … … [10]

12 9990/13/M/J/23 © UCLES 2023 Permission to reproduce items where third‑party owned material protected by copyright is included has been sought and cleared where possible. Every reasonable effort has been made by the publisher (UCLES) to trace copyright holders, but if any items requiring clearance have unwittingly been included, the publisher will be pleased to make amends at the earliest possible opportunity. To avoid the issue of disclosure of answer‑related information to candidates, all copyright acknowledgements are reproduced online in the Cambridge Assessment International Education Copyright Acknowledgements Booklet. This is produced for each series of examinations and is freely available to download at www.cambridgeinternational.org after the live examination series. Cambridge Assessment International Education is part of Cambridge Assessment. Cambridge Assessment is the brand name of the University of Cambridge Local Examinations Syndicate (UCLES), which is a department of the University of Cambridge. BLANK PAGE

This document consists of 11 printed pages. © UCLES 2023 [Turn over Cambridge International AS & A Level PSYCHOLOGY 9990/13 Paper 1 Approaches, issues and debates May/June 2023 MARK SCHEME Maximum Mark: 60 Published This mark scheme is published as an aid to teachers and candidates, to indicate the requirements of the examination. It shows the basis on which Examiners were instructed to award marks. It does not indicate the details of the discussions that took place at an Examiners’ meeting before marking began, which would have considered the acceptability of alternative answers. Mark schemes should be read in conjunction with the question paper and the Principal Examiner Report for Teachers. Cambridge International will not enter into discussions about these mark schemes. Cambridge International is publishing the mark schemes for the May/June 2023 series for most Cambridge IGCSE, Cambridge International A and AS Level and Cambridge Pre-U components, and some Cambridge O Level components.

9990/13 Cambridge International AS & A Level – Mark Scheme PUBLISHED May/June 2023 © UCLES 2023 Page 2 of 11 Generic Marking Principles These general marking principles must be applied by all examiners when marking candidate answers. They should be applied alongside the specific content of the mark scheme or generic level descriptors for a question. Each question paper and mark scheme will also comply with these marking principles. GENERIC MARKING PRINCIPLE 1: Marks must be awarded in line with:  the specific content of the mark scheme or the generic level descriptors for the question  the specific skills defined in the mark scheme or in the generic level descriptors for the question  the standard of response required by a candidate as exemplified by the standardisation scripts. GENERIC MARKING PRINCIPLE 2: Marks awarded are always whole marks (not half marks, or other fractions). GENERIC MARKING PRINCIPLE 3: Marks must be awarded positively:  marks are awarded for correct/valid answers, as defined in the mark scheme. However, credit is given for valid answers which go beyond the scope of the syllabus and mark scheme, referring to your Team Leader as appropriate  marks are awarded when candidates clearly demonstrate what they know and can do  marks are not deducted for errors  marks are not deducted for omissions  answers should only be judged on the quality of spelling, punctuation and grammar when these features are specifically assessed by the question as indicated by the mark scheme. The meaning, however, should be unambiguous. GENERIC MARKING PRINCIPLE 4: Rules must be applied consistently, e.g. in situations where candidates have not followed instructions or in the application of generic level descriptors. GENERIC MARKING PRINCIPLE 5: Marks should be awarded using the full range of marks defined in the mark scheme for the question (however; the use of the full mark range may be limited according to the quality of the candidate responses seen). GENERIC MARKING PRINCIPLE 6: Marks awarded are based solely on the requirements as defined in the mark scheme. Marks should not be awarded with grade thresholds or grade descriptors in mind.

9990/13 Cambridge International AS & A Level – Mark Scheme PUBLISHED May/June 2023 © UCLES 2023 Page 3 of 11 Social Science-Specific Marking Principles (for point-based marking) 1 Components using point-based marking:  Point marking is often used to reward knowledge, understanding and application of skills. We give credit where the candidate’s answer shows relevant knowledge, understanding and application of skills in answering the question. We do not give credit where the answer shows confusion. From this it follows that we: a DO credit answers which are worded differently from the mark scheme if they clearly convey the same meaning (unless the mark scheme requires a specific term) b DO credit alternative answers / examples which are not written in the mark scheme if they are correct c DO credit answers where candidates give more than one correct answer in one prompt/numbered/scaffolded space where extended writing is required rather than list-type answers. For example, questions that require n reasons (e.g. State two reasons.). d DO NOT credit answers simply for using a ‘key term’ unless that is all that is required. (Check for evidence it is understood and not used wrongly.) e DO NOT credit answers which are obviously self-contradicting or trying to cover all possibilities f DO NOT give further credit for what is effectively repetition of a correct point already credited unless the language itself is being tested. This applies equally to ‘mirror statements’ (i.e. polluted / not polluted). g DO NOT require spellings to be correct, unless this is part of the test. However spellings of syllabus terms must allow for clear and unambiguous separation from other syllabus terms with which they may be confused (e.g. Corrasion / Corrosion) 2 Presentation of mark scheme:  Slashes (/) or the word ‘or’ separate alternative ways of making the same point.  Semi colons (;) bullet points (•) or figures in brackets (1) separate different points.  Content in the answer column in brackets is for examiner information / context to clarify the marking but is not required to earn the mark (except Accounting syllabuses where they indicate negative numbers). 3 Annotation:  For point marking, ticks can be used to indicate correct answers and crosses can be used to indicate wrong answers. There is no direct relationship between ticks and marks. Ticks have no defined meaning for levels of response marking.  For levels of response marking, the level awarded should be annotated on the script.  Other annotations will be used by examiners as agreed during standardisation, and the meaning will be understood by all examiners who marked that paper.

9990/13 Cambridge International AS & A Level – Mark Scheme PUBLISHED May/June 2023 © UCLES 2023 Page 4 of 11 Question Answer Marks 1(a) From the study by Schachter and Singer (two factors in emotion): Identify which one of the following groups scored the lowest on the Activity Index in the Euphoria condition. Epinephrine Ignorant (Epi Ign) Epinephrine Informed (Epi Inf) Epinephrine Misinformed (Epi Mis) Placebo 1 mark for correct answer. Epinephrine informed (Epi Inf) 1 1(b) In the Anger condition, an observer recorded the participant’s response to the stooge using several categories. Outline how the category of ‘Neutral’ was operationalised in this study. 1 mark per correct point. A non-committed response; An irrelevant response; To any of the stooge’s remarks; 2 Question Answer Marks 2(a) From the study by Piliavin et al. (subway Samaritans): Name two measures observed for every participant who helped a victim. 1 mark per correct measure. Race; Sex; Location; Latency time for helping; 2 2(b) Identify one methodological strength of this study. 1 mark for correct strength identified. Ecological validity; Mundane realism; Replicable; Generalisable; 1

9990/13 Cambridge International AS & A Level – Mark Scheme PUBLISHED May/June 2023 © UCLES 2023 Page 5 of 11 Question Answer Marks 3(a) In the final part of the study by Bandura et al. (aggression), each participant spent 20 minutes in the experimental room and their behaviour was observed through a one-way mirror. Outline the procedure for this final part of the study. The room contained a range of toys / had Bobo doll and other toys in it; Behaviour was rated on (predetermined) response categories; E.g. imitation of physical aggression, imitative verbal aggression, imitative nonaggressive responses (2 named for 1 mark); The session was divided into 5 second intervals; Using an electric interval timer; A total of 240 response units were recorded per participant; The male model completed all observations; Half were then rated by a second observer (for inter-rater reliability); 3 3(b) Explain one weakness of this final part of the study. 1 mark for identifying an appropriate weakness. 1 mark for linking to study. e.g. There may have been issues with validity of recording behaviours (1 mark) as the observer could distinguish which group a participant was in as nearly all children replicated novel aggressive responses shown by the model (1 mark). There may have been some issues surrounding reliability of observations (1 mark) as the inter-rater reliability score was 0.9 rather than a perfect 1 so not all behaviours were agreed upon (1 mark). 2

9990/13 Cambridge International AS & A Level – Mark Scheme PUBLISHED May/June 2023 © UCLES 2023 Page 6 of 11 Question Answer Marks 4(a) From the study by Milgram (obedience): Describe the feedback from the learner (victim) that was given to the teacher (participant) during this study. 1 mark per correct point. These were predetermined responses; There tended to be three wrong answers to one correct; No vocal response is heard up until Shock Level 300; When 300v given, the learner pounds on the wall; From this point on there are no answers from the learner; The learner pounds again at 315v; After that there is no pounding or answers given; 4 4(b) One conclusion was that people find it stressful to follow destructive orders from a person in authority. Outline one other conclusion from this study. 2 marks full conclusion. 1 mark brief/partial conclusion. Individuals appear to be much more obedient to an authority figure than we might expect (2 marks); People will follow / listen to an authority figure even if it means harming another person (2 marks); People are willing to harm someone if responsibility is taken away / passed on to someone else (2 marks); People will be obedient to an authority figure (1 mark); All participants gave 300v (0 marks: result); 2

9990/13 Cambridge International AS & A Level – Mark Scheme PUBLISHED May/June 2023 © UCLES 2023 Page 7 of 11 Question Answer Marks 5 In Experiment 2 of the study by Laney et al. (false memory), participants completed both the Food History Inventory and photograph ratings of food items. Describe one result from the Food History Inventory and one result from the photograph ratings of food items. You must use data for one of these results. For result: 2 marks for result with a meaningful comparison. 1 mark for partial result / no meaningful comparison. For data: 1 mark for correct data in one of the results. e.g. Food History Inventory The mean confidence of the Love Group increased more than the Control Group (2 marks). This was 2.5 points for the Love Group (1 mark: data); The mean confidence of the Love Group increased (1 mark). e.g. Photograph Ratings Believers rated the asparagus photo as being more appetising compared to controls (2 marks). The score for the believers was 5.1 (1 mark: data); Believers scored lowest on the disgusting rating for asparagus (1 mark). 5 Question Answer Marks 6 Outline two assumptions of the learning approach. You must use an example from a core study for each assumption. For assumptions: 2 mark for full assumption 1 mark for partial assumption. For example: 1 mark per correct example per assumption. Examples have to come from a core study. E.g., assumptions Operant Conditioning can explain changes in behaviour (2 marks); Classical Conditioning can explain changes in behaviour (2 marks); Social Learning can explain changes in behaviour (2 marks); Conditioning can explain behaviour (1 mark); E.g., examples In the Bandura study, children observed and imitated (modelled) aggressive behaviours; In the Pepperberg study, Alex the parrot got rewarded for a correct response to a question; In the Saavedra and Silverman study, classical conditioning (evaluative learning) was used to help understand the causes of his button phobia; 6

9990/13 Cambridge International AS & A Level – Mark Scheme PUBLISHED May/June 2023 © UCLES 2023 Page 8 of 11 Question Answer Marks 7 Suggest two real-world applications based on the study by Baron- Cohen et al. (eyes test). Your suggestions must be ethical. 1 mark for what the application is (clearly based on Baron-Cohen et al.). 1 mark for how it will be achieved. The eyes test could be used as a diagnostic tool for AS/HFA (1 mark: what); those who score low on the test may show a lack of theory of mind (1 mark: how). The eyes test can be used to improve social intelligence in people diagnosed with AS/HFA (1 mark: what). A therapist can run through the test with them explaining why each emotion is being shown (1 mark: how). 4 Question Answer Marks 8 Two friends, Maria and Oscar, are discussing the ethics of the study by Saavedra and Silverman (button phobia). Maria thinks the study is ethical but Oscar thinks the study is not ethical. Explain one reason why Maria is correct and one reason why Oscar is correct, using evidence from this study. 3 marks for Maria. 1 mark per correct point made. 1 mark available for naming guideline. 3 marks for Oscar. 1 mark per correct point made. 1 mark available for naming guideline. E.g., Maria The study did gain informed consent (1 mark). This was taken from the boy and his mother before the therapy started (1 mark). Therefore, both the boy and mother knew exactly what the therapy was going to entail (1 mark); the boy/mother agreed to wanting to take part in the study / having results published (alternative 1 mark). Also, they started the therapy with his least distressing scenario (1 mark). The mother used positive reinforcement during the therapy so the boy would not get too distressed (1 mark). Therefore, the boy was protected from any harm throughout the therapy (1 mark). E.g., Oscar The study could have easily caused psychological stress (1 mark). The boy was having to confront his button phobia throughout the therapy (1 mark). He also had to discuss potential causes/effects of the phobia (e.g., buttons falling on him in art class) which would be stressful (1 mark). 6

9990/13 Cambridge International AS & A Level – Mark Scheme PUBLISHED May/June 2023 © UCLES 2023 Page 9 of 11 Question Answer Marks 9(a) From the study by Yamamoto et al. (chimpanzee helping): Outline what is meant by altruism. 1 mark per correct point. e.g. The willingness to help / doing certain things for someone else (1 mark) even if it disadvantages yourself / gain no benefit (1 mark). 2 9(b) Outline what is meant by targeted helping. 1 mark per correct point. e.g. To select an appropriate tool / offer appropriate advice; To help someone else / a chimpanzee solve a task; As the person/chimpanzee giving the help understands the demands of the situation; 2

9990/13 Cambridge International AS & A Level – Mark Scheme PUBLISHED May/June 2023 © UCLES 2023 Page 10 of 11 Question Answer Marks 9(c) Explain one similarity and one difference between the study by Yamamoto et al. (chimpanzee helping) and the study by Pepperberg (parrot learning). 4 marks available for the similarity. 4 marks available for the difference. Creditworthy points include: sample/sampling, ethics, quantitative data, species used. Level Descriptor Mark 4 The similarity/difference is well explained using both studies as examples. 4 marks 3 The similarity/difference is well explained/described but only one study is used as an example OR both studies used briefly. 3 marks 2 The similarity/difference is brief with an attempt at using at least one study as an example OR The similarity/difference is well explained but there is no study evidence. 2 marks 1 The similarity/difference is brief with no attempt at using studies as examples. 1 mark 0 No creditworthy material. 0 marks e.g. similarity 4 marks Both of the studies used animals/non-humans as participants. Yamamoto used a group of chimpanzees in a Primate Research Laboratory whilst Pepperberg used a solitary African Grey parrot. Therefore, they would have to adhere to the same ethical guidelines of housing etc. 3 marks Both of the studies used animals/non-humans as participants. Yamamoto used a group of chimps to test helping and Pepperberg used a parrot to test his comprehension. 2 marks Both of the studies used animals/non-humans as participants. Yamamoto used a group of chimps.1 mark Both studies used animals/non-humans as participants. 8

9990/13 Cambridge International AS & A Level – Mark Scheme PUBLISHED May/June 2023 © UCLES 2023 Page 11 of 11 Question Answer Marks 10 Evaluate the study by Dement and Kleitman (sleep and dreams) in terms of two strengths and two weaknesses. At least one of your evaluation points must be about reliability. Suitable strengths are: internal validity, reliability, quantitative data. Suitable weaknesses are: external validity, ethics, quantitative data. Level 4 (8–10 marks) • Evaluation is comprehensive. • Answer demonstrates evidence of careful planning, organisation and selection of material. • Analysis (valid conclusions that effectively summarise issues and arguments) is evident throughout. • Answer demonstrates an excellent understanding of the material. Level 3 (6–7 marks) • Evaluation is good. • Answer demonstrates some planning and is well organised. • Analysis is often evident but may not be consistently applied. • Answer demonstrates a good understanding of the material. Level 2 (4–5 marks) • Evaluation is mostly appropriate but limited. • Answer demonstrates limited organisation or lacks clarity. • Analysis is limited. • Answer lacks consistent levels of detail and demonstrates a limited understanding of the material. Level 1 (1–3 marks) • Evaluation is basic. • Answer demonstrates little organisation. • There is little or no evidence of analysis. • Answer does not demonstrate understanding of the material. Level 0 (0 marks) No response worthy of credit. 10