Cambridge IGCSE Design and Technology 0445 — 2014 May/June Paper 1 · Variant 3

This document consists of 4 printed pages and 2 A3 Inserts. DC (CW/SW) 85293/2 © UCLES 2014 [Turn over Cambridge International Examinations Cambridge International General Certificate of Secondary Education * 5 0 2 6 9 7 2 0 6 1 * DESIGN AND TECHNOLOGY 0445/13 Paper 1 Design May/June 2014 1 hour 15 minutes Candidates answer on the pre-printed A3 Answer Sheets. Additional Materials: Standard drawing equipment To be taken together with the optional paper for which you have been entered in one session of 2 hours and 15 minutes. READ THESE INSTRUCTIONS FIRST Write your Centre number, candidate number and name in the spaces on both printed Answer Sheets. Write in dark blue or black pen. You may use an HB pencil for any diagrams, graphs or rough working. Do not use staples, paper clips, glue or correction fluid. Answer one question. Write/draw your answers in the spaces provided on the Answer Sheets. You may use a calculator. At the end of the examination, fasten all your work securely together. The number of marks is given in brackets [ ] at the end of each question or part question.

2 0445/13/M/J/14 © UCLES 2014 Answer one question 1 Envelopes are delivered in different shapes and sizes. Design a rack which could accommodate several different sizes of envelope and also store a device to open them. (a) List four additional points about the function of such a rack. [4] (b) Use sketches and notes to show two different methods of opening envelopes. [4] (c) Develop and sketch three ideas for the rack. [12] (d) Evaluate your ideas and justify why you have chosen one idea to develop more fully. [8] (e) Draw, using a method of your own choice, a full solution to the problem. Include construction details and major dimensions. [12] (f) Suggest suitable specific materials for your solution and give reasons for your choice. [4] (g) Outline a method used to manufacture one part of your solution in the school workshop. [6]

3 0445/13/M/J/14 © UCLES 2014 [Turn over 2 A manufacturer wishes to design a presentation box for a pen, writing paper and envelopes. Design a presentation box which holds the items shown above. The design should allow the items to be seen when the box is closed. (a) List four additional points about the function of such a presentation box. [4] (b) Use sketches and notes to show two different methods that could be used to strengthen the edge of card. [4] (c) Develop and sketch three ideas for the presentation box. [12] (d) Evaluate your ideas and justify why you have chosen one idea to develop more fully. [8] (e) Draw, using a method of your own choice, a full solution to the problem. Include construction details and major dimensions. [12] (f) Suggest suitable specific materials for your solution and give reasons for your choice. [4] (g) Outline a method of producing a prototype of your solution in the school graphics studio. [6]

4 0445/13/M/J/14 © UCLES 2014 3 To provide a security mark, letters can be embossed with the initials of a person or company. paper Design a hand-operated device that will allow the user to bring together the two discs shown above to leave an embossed shape on a single sheet of paper. (a) List four additional points about the function of such an embossing device. [4] (b) Use sketches and notes to show two different mechanisms that could be used to move two surfaces together and apart again. [4] (c) Develop and sketch three ideas for the embossing device. [12] (d) Evaluate your ideas and justify why you have chosen one idea to develop more fully. [8] (e) Draw, using a method of your own choice, a full solution to the problem. Include construction details and major dimensions. [12] (f) Suggest suitable specific materials for your solution and give reasons for your choice. [4] (g) Outline a method used to manufacture one part of your solution in the school workshop. [6] Permission to reproduce items where third-party owned material protected by copyright is included has been sought and cleared where possible. Every reasonable effort has been made by the publisher (UCLES) to trace copyright holders, but if any items requiring clearance have unwittingly been included, the publisher will be pleased to make amends at the earliest possible opportunity. Cambridge International Examinations is part of the Cambridge Assessment Group. Cambridge Assessment is the brand name of University of Cambridge Local Examinations Syndicate (UCLES), which is itself a department of the University of Cambridge.

CAMBRIDGE INTERNATIONAL EXAMINATIONS International General Certificate of Secondary Education MARK SCHEME for the May/June 2014 series 0445 DESIGN AND TECHNOLOGY 0445/13 Paper 1 (Design), maximum raw mark 50 This mark scheme is published as an aid to teachers and candidates, to indicate the requirements of the examination. It shows the basis on which Examiners were instructed to award marks. It does not indicate the details of the discussions that took place at an Examiners’ meeting before marking began, which would have considered the acceptability of alternative answers. Mark schemes should be read in conjunction with the question paper and the Principal Examiner Report for Teachers. Cambridge will not enter into discussions about these mark schemes. Cambridge is publishing the mark schemes for the May/June 2014 series for most IGCSE, GCE Advanced Level and Advanced Subsidiary Level components and some Ordinary Level components.

Page 2 Mark Scheme Syllabus Paper IGCSE – May/June 2014 0445 13 © Cambridge International Examinations 2014 1 (a) Accept any four additional suitable points – store sizes separately, addresses visible, positioned on wall / desk / floor, easy to place / remove envelopes, etc. (1 × 4) [4] (b) Accept drawings of any two suitable methods – paper knife, scissors, slice with blade / guillotine, steam / peel open, etc. (2 × 2) [4] (c) Any suitable ideas. At least three different ideas for maximum marks. Pro rata if fewer. Communication Simple drawings displaying a low standard or limited range of techniques (0–2) Clear drawings displaying a good standard and a range of techniques – shading /colour/annotation etc. (3–4) High quality drawings using a wide range of techniques with clear annotation and detail (5–6) Suitability Simplistic designs showing outlines only (0–2) Rather more detail, sensible solutions that could work (3–4) Accurate solutions, good fitness for purpose, detailed construction (5–6) [12] (d) Evaluation of each of the ideas. At least 3 evaluations up to 2 marks each (0–6) Selection and justification. (1+1) (2) [8] (e) Quality of drawing Poor line quality, proportions, little detail (1) Good line work, use of colour, proportions, some detail (2–3) High standard throughout with a range of techniques that show clearly all detail (4) Dimensions 2 or 3 overall dimensions only – 1 Additional detail dimensions – 2 (2) Construction details A simplistic approach showing little or no detail of construction to be used (0–2) Most constructional detail may be obvious from overall views or with some annotation (3–4) All constructional detail will be clear with good annotation and additional detail drawings as necessary (5–6) [12] (f) Suitable specific materials stated. (1+1) (2) Appropriate reasons for choice. (1+1) (2) [4] (g) Suitable method stated. (1) Good detailed description of: processes; (3) tools. (2) [6] [Total: 50]

Page 3 Mark Scheme Syllabus Paper IGCSE – May/June 2014 0445 13 © Cambridge International Examinations 2014 2 (a) Accept any four additional suitable points – suitable size / shape for handling, interesting theme / colour, items easy to access, protect items, etc. (1 × 4) [4] (b) Accept drawings of any two methods – fold over, several thicknesses / layers, add wire spiral, add rod / strip, etc. (2 × 2) [4] (c) Any suitable ideas. At least three different ideas for maximum marks. Pro rata if fewer. Communication Simple drawings displaying a low standard or limited range of techniques (0–2) Clear drawings displaying a good standard and a range of techniques – shading /colour/annotation etc. (3–4) High quality drawings using a wide range of techniques with clear annotation and detail (5–6) Suitability Simplistic designs showing outlines only (0–2) Rather more detail, sensible solutions that could work (3–4) Accurate solutions, good fitness for purpose, detailed construction (5–6) [12] (d) Evaluation of each of the ideas. At least 3 evaluations up to 2 marks each (0–6) Selection and justification. (1+1) (2) [8] (e) Quality of drawing Poor line quality, proportions, little detail (1) Good line work, use of colour, proportions, some detail (2–3) High standard throughout with a range of techniques that show clearly all detail (4) Dimensions 2 or 3 overall dimensions only – 1 Additional detail dimensions – 2 (2) Construction details A simplistic approach showing little or no detail of construction to be used (0–2) Most constructional detail may be obvious from overall views or with some annotation (3–4) All constructional detail will be clear with good annotation and additional detail drawings as necessary (5–6) [12] (f) Suitable specific materials stated. (1+1) (2) Appropriate reasons for choice. (1+1) (2) [4] (g) Suitable method stated. (1) Good detailed description of: processes; (3) tools. (2) [6] [Total: 50]

Page 4 Mark Scheme Syllabus Paper IGCSE – May/June 2014 0445 13 © Cambridge International Examinations 2014 3 (a) Accept any four additional suitable points – easy to use by anyone, register for paper, amount of effort required, suggested size / weight / material, etc. (1 × 4) [4] (b) Accept any two methods – lever, cam, slider, screw, spring return, etc. (2 × 2) [4] (c) Any suitable ideas. At least three different ideas for maximum marks. Pro rata if fewer. Communication Simple drawings displaying a low standard or limited range of techniques (0–2) Clear drawings displaying a good standard and a range of techniques – shading /colour/annotation etc. (3–4) High quality drawings using a wide range of techniques with clear annotation and detail (5–6) Suitability Simplistic designs showing outlines only (0–2) Rather more detail, sensible solutions that could work (3–4) Accurate solutions, good fitness for purpose, detailed construction (5–6) [12] (d) Evaluation of each of the ideas. At least 3 evaluations up to 2 marks each (0–6) Selection and justification. (1+1) (2) [8] (e) Quality of drawing Poor line quality, proportions, little detail (1) Good line work, use of colour, proportions, some detail (2–3) High standard throughout with a range of techniques that show clearly all detail (4) Dimensions 2 or 3 overall dimensions only – 1 Additional detail dimensions – 2 (2) Construction details A simplistic approach showing little or no detail of construction to be used (0–2) Most constructional detail may be obvious from overall views or with some annotation (3–4) All constructional detail will be clear with good annotation and additional detail drawings as necessary (5–6) [12] (f) Suitable specific materials stated. (1+1) (2) Appropriate reasons for choice. (1+1) (2) [4] (g) Suitable method stated. (1) Good detailed description of: processes; (3) tools. (2) [6] [Total: 50]